Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPDD) is a common and underrecognized form of arthritis in older adult patients.
The clinical presentation of CPDD is broad and ranges from an acute monoarticular inflammatory arthritis to a chronic polyarticular noninflammatory arthritis.
CPDD can be sporadic or familial and is associated with several metabolic disorders, including hyperparathyroidism, hemochromatosis, hypophosphatasia, and hypomagnesemia.
Accurate diagnosis of CPDD relies on the observation of calcium pyrophosphate crystals in synovial fluid from affected joints under compensated polarized light microscopy.
This pathogenesis of CPDD is rooted in excess accumulation of pyrophosphate in hyaline cartilage and fibrocartilage.
Acute CPP crystal arthritis is managed with strategies similar to those of acute gout. Similar treatments are often used in patients with the chronic polyarticular forms of CPDD.
Calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPDD) is arthritis caused by calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystals. Although scattered descriptions of calcified cartilage exist in the literature dating back to the early 1900s, the significance of this finding was not fully appreciated until the early 1960s, when two groups of astute clinicians described clinical arthritis associated with CPP crystals. In Hungary, Zitnan and Sit’Aj described a group of patients with a severe osteoarthritis (OA)-like syndrome associated with linear calcific densities in articular cartilage on radiographs. Almost simultaneously, McCarty et al. described patients with gout-like arthritis who had synovial fluid CPP crystals. These two descriptions foreshadowed the clinical heterogeneity and many of the other characteristic features of CPDD. CPDD is a common and often unrecognized cause of arthritis in older adults. It has an interesting pathophysiology rooted in pyrophosphate metabolism. Management strategies for CPDD currently exist, but more specific and effective therapies are needed.
One of the major challenges in the calcium crystal field is the lack of standard nomenclature. In 2011, a group of experts convened through the auspices of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) valiantly attempted to deal with this issue. As shown in Table 196.1 , the EULAR suggested that the term pseudogout be eliminated and replaced with the term acute CPP crystal arthritis . It proposed that the widely variable terms used to refer to calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystals be replaced with the term calcium pyrophosphate crystals and that the presence of CPP crystals in tissues and fluids be referred to as CPP deposition (CPPD). They divided the multiple chronic clinical syndromes associated with CPP crystals, initially defined by Ryan and McCarty into (1) OA with CPPD and (2) chronic CPP crystal inflammatory arthritis. Although the term chondrocalcinosis was not replaced, it is important to remember that it refers only to the radiographic finding in this disease and should not be confused with the clinical syndrome. Last, many of us in this field use the term calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease , abbreviated CPDD, as an umbrella term to connote clinically important arthritis associated with CPP crystals. This new nomenclature has some limitations, and time and effort will be required to promote broad adoption by the medical community.
Definition | Old Terms | EULAR Recommendations | Preferred Term (Abbreviation) |
---|---|---|---|
Radiographic correlate of CPPD | Chondrocalcinosis, chondrocalcinosis articularis | Chondrocalcinosis | Chondrocalcinosis (CC) |
Acute inflammatory arthritis caused by CPP crystals | Pseudogout | Acute CPP crystal arthritis | Acute CPP crystal arthritis |
Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystals | Calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate; calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate | Calcium pyrophosphate crystals | Calcium pyrophosphate crystals (CPP crystals) |
All clinical syndromes associated with CPP crystals | Calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate deposition disease | None | Calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPPD) |
Chronic arthritis caused by CPP crystals ± inflammation | Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition disease: pyrophosphate arthropathy; pseudorheumatoid arthritis; pseudoosteoarthritis | Chronic CPP crystal arthritis, OA with CPPD | Chronic CPP crystal arthritis, OA with CPPD |
Deposition of calcium pyrophosphate crystals in joints or tissue with or without clinical symptoms | Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition | CPPD | Calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) |
The true prevalence of CPDD is unknown. Our current estimates are largely based on the prevalence of chondrocalcinosis, the radiographic correlate of CPPD ( Fig. 196.1 ). Even these data rely on relatively few large population-based studies. These include an American study that used the Framingham database to demonstrate a 3% prevalence of chondrocalcinosis of the knee in an adult population. In the United Kingdom, a similar study demonstrated a prevalence of knee chondrocalcinosis of 7% to 10% in people older than 60 years of age. The prevalence of chondrocalcinosis is clearly age dependent and rises dramatically with each decade over the age of 60 years. There is no clear sex preference, but chondrocalcinosis may be less common in certain populations, such as the Chinese. The prevalence of chondrocalcinosis is also dependent on which joint is examined. For example, in a study looking at chest radiographs, only 1.1% of people older than 50 years of age had chondrocalcinosis of the acromioclavicular joint. In contrast, a recent study of more than 1000 abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans found that 21.1% of randomly selected CT scans in patients demonstrated chondrocalcinosis of the pubic symphysis in patients older than the age of 65 years, and similar work showed a prevalence of 12.5% at age 55 years and 27.5% at age 95 years.
The prevalence of clinically important arthritis associated with CPP crystals is much more difficult to accurately assess. In a recent study of hospitalizations related to crystal arthritis, gout represented 48% of cases and CPDD accounted for 43%. Thus the burden of this disease in the inpatient setting may be similar to that of gout. We know that CPP crystals are present in 20% to 30% of knee fluids at the time of surgery in patients diagnosed with OA. Interestingly, careful examination of tissues at the time of either knee or hip replacement suggests an identical prevalence. Because OA occurs in about 27 million Americans, extrapolating these data would result in a conservative estimate of between 5 and 8 million affected people in the United States.
Calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease has a heterogeneous clinical presentation. McCarty described six different clinical presentations of this disease. As in many rheumatic diseases, the initial clinical manifestations may change with time. Taken together with the considerable clinical overlap with other common syndromes of aging, these issues render CPDD a challenging condition to define.
The significance of asymptomatic chondrocalcinosis is a question of active debate and deserves careful study. Several older studies have shown that the presence of chondrocalcinosis has no demonstrable effect on the severity or progression of joint degeneration in large joints. However, others clearly show a link between chondrocalcinosis and joint degeneration. It is possible that asymptomatic chondrocalcinosis represents a preclinical harbinger of arthritis, similar to the relationship of hyperuricemia with acute gouty arthritis. Alternatively or in addition, asymptomatic chondrocalcinosis might be analogous to radiographic changes of OA, which often occur in patients with few or no symptoms. The high percentage of patients with end-stage large joint OA who have CPPD suggests something unique about the articular environment in these patients. Because in vitro studies clearly demonstrate the destructive potential of these crystals, it is likely that they play an active role in joint damage (see “Pathogenesis”).
Acute CPP crystal arthritis is the most broadly recognized form of CPDD. It presents with acute or subacute onset of pain and swelling in and around one or a few joints. Physical examination shows signs of inflammation with erythema, swelling, and warmth around the affected joint. Tenosynovitis may be seen. The initial clinical picture is identical to that of other common causes of acute monoarticular arthritis such as gout, infection, and trauma. The knee is the most commonly involved joint ( Fig. 196.2 ). The wrist is also a common site of involvement, and other joints such as the shoulders, elbows, and ankles are often involved. Podagra has been described but is rare. Synovial fluid is inflammatory with high white blood cell counts, and CPP crystals are visible with compensated polarizing light microscopy ( Fig. 196.3 ). Cell counts may be over 100,000 cells/μL. Radiographs demonstrating chondrocalcinosis may support the diagnosis and are helpful to rule out other processes, such as fractures. Acute CPP crystal arthritis has several important characteristics that may help differentiate it from gout ( Table 196.2 ). The first is the joint distribution. Second, the presence of blood-tinged synovial fluid is considered to be more common in acute CPP crystal arthritis than in gout ( Fig. 196.4 ). Last, an untreated acute attack in CPDD may last weeks to months compared with the 7 to 14 days of most untreated gout attacks.
Symptom or Sign | Acute Gout | Acute CPP Crystal Arthritis |
---|---|---|
Pattern of joint involvement | First MCP joint, other lower extremity joints | Knee, wrist, ankle, spine |
Response to colchicine | Excellent in early attack | Variable |
Blood in joint fluid | Unusual | Not unusual |
Duration of attack | 7–14 days | Days to weeks |
Many patients with acute CPP arthritis present with a chronic arthritis punctuated by acute inflammatory attacks. They typically have involvement of joints that are not usually involved in OA, such as the second and third metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, shoulders, and wrists ( Fig. 196.5 ). Between attacks of acute inflammation, these patients describe typical chronic noninflammatory joint pain. This disease pattern may represent a significant number of patients with CPDD, but true percentages are unknown.
Patients with chronic noninflammatory joint pain represent a significant percentage of CPDD patients, and some experts believe that this may be the most common presentation of this disease. The odd pattern of joint involvement including the second and third MCP joints, shoulders, wrists, and ankles aids in distinguishing these patients from those with typical OA. Again, the presence of CPP crystals in synovial fluids from involved joints should support a diagnosis of CPDD. In the absence of this finding, the overlap between OA and this form of CPDD is often difficult to tease apart.
CPDD can manifest as a polyarticular inflammatory arthritis that can resemble and be confused with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (see the discussion of associated diseases later). This syndrome manifests as polyarticular inflammatory arthritis of large and small joints. Symmetric joint involvement may be less common than in typical RA, and flares tend to involve joints sequentially rather than simultaneously as in most patients with RA. To add further complexity to the differential diagnosis, about 10% of patients with CPDD have positive rheumatoid factors. However, patients with the “pseudorheumatoid” form of CPDD can be distinguished from that of typical RA by the absence of anticitrullinated peptide antibodies, radiographic erosions, the lack of symmetric inflammatory attacks, the presence of radiographic osteophytes, and synovial fluid CPP crystals.
Case reports of a severe destructive arthropathy similar to neuropathic arthropathy associated with CPDD were first published in the early 1960s. This form of CPDD can affect both weight-bearing and non–weight-bearing joints and is distinguished from true neuropathic arthritis by the absence of neuropathy and the presence of CPP crystals. Cases involving temporomandibular joints (TMJs) and ankles have been reported recently. This form of CPDD appears to be quite rare, but CPDD should be considered in the differential diagnosis of unexplained severe destructive arthritis.
Spinal deposition of CPP crystals is often noted on imaging studies and may be asymptomatic in some cases. Feinberg et al. showed that 3% of adult spinal disks had calcification and that CPP crystals accounted for 49% of these deposits. CPP crystals have been described in the ligamentum flavum, intervertebral disks, and the facet joints of the spine. Cases of spondylodiscitis and epidural abscesses, canal stenosis, and acute sciatic nerve compression have been attributed to CPPD.
Crowned dens syndrome is a distinctive presentation of spinal CPPD caused by inflammation from CPP crystal deposits around the dens. Affected patients have acute neck pain associated with fever, occipital headache, limited range of motion of the cervical spine, and elevated inflammatory markers. It may be confused with aseptic meningitis, tumor, or acute spinal cord compression. The diagnosis typically relies on observation of calcified deposits on CT scans ( Fig. 196.6 ). CPP deposition around the dens can occur in the absence of symptoms. Although crowned dens syndrome is typically managed medically, acute decompression can be effective and aspiration of crystals through an anterior approach has been successful. In this vulnerable older adult population, rapid diagnosis avoids unnecessary tests, invasive procedures, and inappropriate treatments.
There are more than 30 case reports of tophaceous CPPD affecting multiple tissues. Many reports describe periarticular deposits, often involving the TMJ area and tendon sheaths of the feet and ankles. CPP crystal deposits have also been described in the mitral valve. When tophaceous CPP deposits occur in the soft tissues around the hip, elbow, or sternoclavicular joints, they may resemble rheumatoid nodules. Some appear relatively noninflammatory, but others are quite destructive and can be mistaken for tumors or abscesses. This aggressive behavior explains why extraarticular CPPD is also sometimes referred to tumoral pseudogout .
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here