Neurologic complications of cancer


Introduction to medical complications of brain tumors

Patients with brain tumors are at risk of many complications from their cancer. Complications may result from direct effects of the tumor itself due to infiltration of the brain parenchyma or mass effect, often manifesting as focal neurologic deficits. Non-focal symptoms such as headache, nausea, vomiting, and mental status changes may occur as a result of increased intracranial pressure or endocrinopathy. Brain tumors and associated cerebral edema may compress blood vessels or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) outflow, resulting in ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or hydrocephalus. Irritation of the cerebral cortex or cortical networks by either tumor or cerebral edema may result in tumor-associated epilepsy. Indirect effects of brain tumors occur due to disruption of neuronal networks and can present as cognitive dysfunction, memory loss, fatigue, and sleep disturbances. Additionally, patients with brain tumors are at risk for venous thromboembolic events due to hypercoagulability from their malignancy and have a high prevalence of limb paresis and limited mobility. Providers should maintain a high level of suspicion for medical complications, as these are common in brain tumor patients and require urgent evaluation and management.

When evaluating a brain tumor patient with new onset of symptoms, a detailed history and physical examination are imperative. The onset and temporal evolution of symptoms can provide valuable information to guide further workup. For example, acute onset of headache and lethargy favors intracerebral hemorrhage, whereas the same symptoms presenting as gradual worsening over several weeks may suggest obstructive hydrocephalus. In this chapter, we will discuss the presentation, evaluation, management, and treatment of common medical complications of brain tumors.

Clinical cases

Case 19.1
Direct Effects of Brain Tumors

Case. A 45-year-old woman with a history of glioblastoma presents to the Emergency Department with confusion and a progressively worsening headache over the past 2 weeks. She also complains of nausea and vomiting during this time. She appears to be visibly in pain. On examination, she is disoriented to time and place and has difficulty answering simple questions. Her metabolic and hematologic laboratory values are within normal limits. CT Head shows dilation of the lateral ventricles with near obstruction of the fourth ventricle, consistent with obstructive hydrocephalus. MRI Brain shows dilated ventricles with trans-ependymal flow of cerebrospinal fluid ( Fig. 19.1 ). Neurosurgery was emergently consulted, and an external ventricular drain was placed with rapid improvement of her symptoms.

Fig. 19.1, MRI of the patient in Case 19.1 . (A) Axial fluid-attenuated inversion recover image showing dilation of the lateral ventricles with obstructive hydrocephalus and trans-ependymal flow of cerebrospinal fluid. (B) Axial post-contrast T1-weighted image reveals a contrast - enhancing mass of the septum pellucidum.

Teaching Points: Managing Obstructive Hydrocephalus, Vasogenic Edema, Tumor-Associated Epilepsy and Cerebrovascular Complications . This case underscores some of the complications of brain tumors that develop as a result of the direct effects of the tumor, including obstructive hydrocephalus, vasogenic edema, tumor-associated epilepsy, hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke, and endocrinopathy. In particular, this case highlights the evaluation and management of patients with obstructive hydrocephalus.

Hydrocephalus is a potentially life-threatening complication of brain tumors and the associated cerebral edema that occurs due to obstruction of CSF flow. It commonly presents with symptoms of raised intracranial pressure such as headache, mental status changes, nausea, and vomiting. Evaluation with CT of the head can quickly evaluate for the presence and degree of hydrocephalus. Neurosurgical intervention by external ventricular drainage of CSF is often required to relieve the elevated intracranial pressure by diverting CSF from the ventricles. External ventricular drainage is a temporary solution to emergently relieve increased intracranial pressure. If obstruction is unable to be relieved with surgery or corticosteroids, conversion to a cerebral shunt may be required.

Approach to tumor-induced vasogenic edema

Tumor-induced vasogenic edema occurs due to disruption of the blood-brain barrier, preferentially affecting white matter. The type and severity of neurologic symptoms are affected by the degree of edema and location of edema. Evaluation of cerebral edema is best accomplished with MRI of the brain using T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR sequences). Edema appears as T2 hyperintensity. The decision to treat cerebral edema should be based on clinical findings and neurologic symptoms. Asymptomatic patients with cerebral edema seen on imaging do not require treatment. Corticosteroids, particularly dexamethasone, are the primary treatment for clinically symptomatic cerebral edema. Dexamethasone is preferred due to its minimal mineralocorticoid activity. By decreasing blood-brain barrier permeability, corticosteroids can effectively reduce intracranial pressure, improving cerebral edema and neurologic symptoms within days.

Dexamethasone . Dosing of dexamethasone is largely dependent on symptoms. Severe symptomatic cerebral edema can be treated with intravenous dexamethasone 10–24 mg followed by oral dexamethasone. Doses of 2–4 mg of oral dexamethasone administered two to four times per day are commonly used. In the outpatient setting, twice-daily dosing is often sufficient, with the second dose administered in the afternoon to prevent insomnia. Although corticosteroids can quickly improve neurologic symptoms and function, their acute and long-term use is associated with many side effects. Acutely, patients may experience hyperglycemia, insomnia, and mood disturbances such as anxiety or mania. Chronic corticosteroid use is associated with a host of complications including weight gain, Cushing syndrome, and steroid myopathy. Endocrine and neuropsychiatric effects of corticosteroids are discussed later in this chapter.

Given the side effect profile, patients should be maintained on the lowest effective dose of dexamethasone. Tapering or discontinuing corticosteroids should be considered at every patient encounter, although some patients may be unable to safely taper off steroids due to re-emergence of focal neurologic symptoms or seizures. Additionally, patients with chronic corticosteroid use may have difficulty tapering off steroids secondary to adrenal insufficiency. The risks of corticosteroid treatment must be weighed against their symptomatic benefit, as their effects can have profound medical and functional implications. Anti-angiogenic agents such as beva cizumab, a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, can be used in recurrent malignant gliomas to reduce cerebral edema and corticosteroid dependence.

Approach to tumor-associated epilepsy

Seizures are among the most common complications of brain tumors. The likelihood of developing seizures from a brain tumor is variable and influenced by tumor location, histology, and rate of growth. Tumors involving the cortex, temporal lobe, and insula are associated with higher rates of epilepsy, whereas tumors involving the posterior fossa or deep structures rarely cause seziures. Tumor histology is also associated with increased rates of epilepsy. Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors and oligodendrogliomas are associated with epilepsy in up to 90% of cases. , In such epileptogenic tumors, gross-total surgical resection is strongly associated with seizure freedom. , High-grade glioma patients experience rates of tumor-associated epilepsy of 30–50% and may experience seizures at any point during their disease course. , Therefore, if a brain tumor patient presents with paroxysmal or fluctuating symptoms, seizure activity should be high on the differential. Electroencephalography may be helpful to characterize episodes that are not clinically consistent with seizure activity.

There is some evidence to suggest that brain tumor–directed treatment, including radiation and chemotherapy, may improve seizure control, although cancer-specific treatments are not considered first line for managing tumor-associated epilepsy. , Current standard of care practices involve treating brain tumor patients who present with seizures with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). No data exists to support the efficacy of one AED compared with another. Given the increasing number of available AEDs, the drug chosen should take into account a patient’s epilepsy syndrome, medical comorbidities, desired speed of titration, and side effect profile of the drug. It is recommended to avoid enzyme-inducing drugs, as these may interact with the metabolism of corticosteroids and cancer-directed treatments such as chemotherapy. Common enzyme-inducing AEDs include phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, and oxcarbazepine. Table 19.1 shows non–enzyme- inducing AEDs that are commonly used in brain tumor patients. For example, levetiracetam is an AED frequently used to treat tumor-associated epilepsy. It has no known drug interactions, minimal hepatic metabolism, requires no specific monitoring, and can be administered orally or intravenously. It is generally well tolerated by patients, with the most common adverse effects being agitation and aggression. Enzyme inhibiting AEDs such as valproic acid should be used with caution, especially in patients treated with hepatically cleared chemotherapeutic agents, as it may increase toxicity of these drugs.

Table 19.1
Non–enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs commonly used in brain tumor patients
Drug Route Common Side Effects Primary Metabolism
Brivaracetam Oral, IV Sedation, fatigue, psychiatric disturbance Unknown
Lacosamide Oral, IV Dizziness Mixed
Lamotrigine Oral Rash, Steven-Johnson syndrome Hepatic
Levetiracetam Oral, IV Agitation, psychosis, fatigue Unknown
Pregabalin Oral Weight gain, sedation, thrombocytopenia Renal
Topiramate Oral Dizziness, paresthesia, nephrolithiasis, metabolic acidosis, weight loss, cognitive impairment Mixed
Valproic acid a Oral, IV Thrombocytopenia, hair loss, tremor, hyperammonemia,
weight gain, pancreatitis
Hepatic
Zonisamide Oral Paresthesia, nephrolithiasis, metabolic acidosis, anorexia Renal
IV , Intravenous.

a Valproic acid is an enzyme inhibitor.

AEDs are associated with many adverse effects and nearly 25% of patients will experience side effects of AED therapy requiring drug discontinuation. Common side effects of AEDs include symptoms of central nervous system depression such as fatigue, cognitive slowing, ataxia, and dizziness. Other specific adverse effects that can be seen are drug dependent and are listed in Table 19.1 . When patients present with these symptoms, a thorough history, metabolic workup, and AED serum levels may be used to distinguish whether symptoms are due to adverse effects from the drug rather than direct effects of the tumor itself. Although appropriate treatment of tumor-associated epilepsy may lead to a decrease or cessation of seizures, all patients and their caregivers should be educated on seizure safety and home management of acute, symptomatic seizures. Driving restrictions should be discussed with all patients who have experienced seizures with loss of awareness or consciousness. Driving restrictions are variable by region, therefore patients and physicians should familiarize themselves with local regulations and procedures.

The American Academy of Neurology Quality Standards Subcommittee performed a meta-analysis of randomized studies assessing the benefit of prophylactic AED treatment in brain tumor patients. Prophylactic treatment was found to have an increased burden of side effects without an improvement in rates of tumor-associated epilepsy when compared with placebo or no treatment. This led to a recommendation against administration of prophylactic AEDs in patients with brain tumors. Although this recommendation was based on results from studies utilizing first- or second-generation AEDs, more recent reviews have shown similar findings with newer non–enzyme-inducing AEDs. As such, it is currently recommended to only treat brain tumor patients who have experienced a seizure with AEDs.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here