Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
On completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
Know the abdominal quadrants and regions of the body
List the body planes in the abdomen
Identify the abdominal structures in the transverse and sagittal planes
Discuss the difference between a coronal image and a sagittal image
Compare and contrast computed tomography and magnetic resonance to ultrasound
Sonographers should understand other imaging modalities, especially computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which most frequently complement sonography. No longer does each of the various imaging modalities operate within a “silo,” independent of each other. Instead, many diagnostic algorithms may require two or more imaging modalities to be employed, and diagnosis requires specific comparisons between them. In this way, ultrasound now interacts extensively with CT and other imaging methods to optimize the workup of a patient. Understanding what each modality offers is of prime importance in crafting the multimodality imaging workup for any particular problem.
Physicians may utilize ultrasound to follow up an abnormality that has been previously diagnosed with CT or MRI. Ultrasound is often the primary imaging tool as it provides rapid access with good soft tissue and vascular analysis. Depending on the clinical problem, it may be preferred over CT, which involves ionizing radiation, or MRI, both time-consuming and costly. To effectively meet the patient’s needs, the sonographer must tailor their exam appropriately to exploit the unique strengths of ultrasound and minimize its limitations. The sonographer must also understand how the ultrasound examination in each setting may be influenced or guided by findings from previous CT, MRI, or other imaging studies.
The various imaging modalities have the ability to ultimately depict and evaluate the same abnormalities, and they are generally equivalent in identifying the physical size and shape of pathologic lesions. However, each modality approaches the problem from a different standpoint, using differing physical properties of the normal tissue and pathologic lesions to derive image contrast and resolve important details. As previously stated, ultrasound and MRI both have a safety advantage in that they do not use ionizing radiation. On the other hand, CT scanning and general diagnostic (radiographic) imaging both image the body using ionizing radiation, often in significant doses. The radiation for both CT and radiography is produced by an external source and tends to produce sharp images with high anatomic detail.
The purpose of this chapter is to introduce the sonographer to sectional anatomy as compared with CT, MRI, and ultrasound images ( Table 5.1 ).
Ultrasound | CT | MRI | |
---|---|---|---|
Exam cost | $100–$1200 | $1200–$3200 | $2400–$6400 |
Scan time | 5 min (FAST exam) to 45 min | 5 min | 20–40 min |
Portability | Yes | No | No |
Radiation exposure | No | Yes | No |
Contrast use | Under evaluation | Nephrotoxic/adverse reaction to iodinated contrast agent | Gadolinium (may cause side effects in patients with impaired renal function) |
Image detail/contrast | Good detail, but less than CT, MRI | Good spatial resolution/ detail | Good detail; Better contrast |
Image planes | All planes | Transverse; after helical scan with multiplanar function, operator can construct any plane | All planes |
Contraindications | None | Not applicable for pregnant patients | Implanted metal devices |
Visualization of bony structures | No | Good detail | Good detail |
Visualization of soft tissue structures | Detailed evaluation of soft tissues and blood vessels with hemodynamic data | Detailed soft tissue and blood vessels | Detailed soft tissue and blood vessels |
Recall that ultrasound utilizes high-frequency sound waves by manually placing a transducer with a piezoelectric crystal on or inside the body. The various acoustic interfaces reflect the transmission of the sound waves to create an image. Ultrasound images may be quickly produced in real-time cine loops so movement may be easily seen and advantageous in emergent situations. Ultrasound technology is an excellent diagnostic tool for seeing live images of the working structures of the body. Ultrasound is the “eyes” for helping physicians obtain a closer look into the body to make an accurate diagnosis. The quality of the ultrasound images is produced based on the reflection of the waves off of the body structures. The strength or amplitude of the sound signal and the time it takes for the wave to travel through the body provide the information necessary to produce an image.
The advantages of ultrasound are numerous. The system is portable, ranging in size from hand-held pocket devices to high-end larger equipment. It is nonionizing and therefore is excellent to image the neonatal, pediatric, and adult patients, the pregnant patient, and the fetus. Ultrasound may be able to characterize the internal composition of a mass to distinguish cystic from solid components. The definition of soft tissue structures, internal organs, causes for abdominal pain, emergency department trauma “FAST” evaluations, and evaluation of muscles and tendons is well documented with ultrasound. Ultrasound is useful to document the site and depth of the mass for biopsy procedures. Its portability makes it invaluable for the physician in the emergency department and operating room. Ultrasound may be used in the neonatal nursery to provide daily evaluations of the premature neonate.
The disadvantage is that ultrasound does not transmit through bone or gas (lungs and bowel).
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here