Treatment planning in palliative radiotherapy


Introduction

It is estimated that up to 40% of patients with advanced cancers will receive palliative radiation therapy (RT) during the course of their disease. While specific details of patient, treatment modality, and dose selection are discussed elsewhere in this book, we will focus on (1) treatment simulation, planning, evaluation, and delivery techniques for conventional external beam and stereotactic radiotherapy and (2) additional innovative approaches for palliative radiotherapy treatment, including spatially fractionated (grid) radiotherapy and proton radiotherapy.

Part I: Approaches for conventional external beam and stereotactic radiotherapy

Simulation

Simulation is performed to isolate the treatment target and potentially identify adjacent organs at risk (OAR) in anticipation of treatment planning. Care must be taken to ensure that appropriate patient positioning and immobilization are achieved to optimize treatment beam arrangement and reliable radiotherapy delivery. Simulation techniques commonly used include clinical setup, conventional simulation, and computed tomography (CT) simulation. Table 8.1 shows the relative advantages of each of these three simulation techniques.

TABLE 8.1
Features of Treatment Simulation Using Clinical Setup, Conventional Simulation, and CT Simulation Techniques
Data from Elledge CR, Alcorn SR. Treatment planning palliative radiotherapy. In: Berger AM, O’Neill JF, eds. Principles and Practice of Palliative Care and Supportive Oncology . 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: Wolters Kluwer; 2022.
SIMULATION TECHNIQUE
Feature Clinical Setup Conventional Simulation CT Simulation
Time to perform Fast Fast Relatively more time-intensive
Staff required Minimal: RT therapist, physician, and physicist Minimal: RT therapist, physician, and physicist Extensive: CT technologist or RT therapist with CT training, physician, physicist, and dosimetrist for planning phase
Treatment positioning options Permits for unique positioning (e.g., sitting) Permits for unique positioning (e.g., sitting) Requires supine, prone, or decubitus positioning
Immobilization options Multiple options can be used Multiple options can be used Immobilization options may be limited by size of CT scanner bore
Target visualization Limited Limited Excellent for many targets
Motion management options Abdominal compression
  • – Abdominal compression

  • – Fluoroscopy can provide limited tumor motion assessment

Multiple options can be used
Ability to conduct conformal planning Not possible Not possible Permits for conformal planning, thus permitting dose escalation when indicated
Ability to perform dose calculations for targets and OAR Not possible Limited Fully capable
Ability to fuse other imaging studies for planning Not possible Not possible Can be fused to other volumetric imaging modalities to enhance visualization of the target and OAR
CT, Computed tomography; OAR, organ(s) at risk; RT, radiation therapy.

Clinical setup

In circumstances where treatment must begin urgently—particularly at times in which all usual members of the clinical team such as dosimetry may not be available—clinical setup offers an expedited means to initiate simple palliative treatments. While protocols for clinical setup vary across facilities, this treatment technique involves the following steps:

  • 1.

    The patient is placed in the optimal treatment position, with immobilization devices selected according to the target location.

  • 2.

    The radiation oncologist selects an appropriate position for treatment isocenter.

  • 3.

    Optimal beam and collimator angles, beam energy, and couch position are selected.

  • 4.

    Megavoltage portal imaging is acquired to confirm the treatment field parameters are appropriate for the target. Anatomic landmarks are often used as proxy for the tumor target if not well-visualized on portal imaging.

  • 5.

    Monitor unit calculations (and often subsequent hand calculations) are performed based on field size, beam energy, and source to surface distance measurements, specific to the treatment machine setup parameters.

At our institution, patients receiving multifraction treatments often undergo CT simulation during the next available simulation session. In general, the case then undergoes three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) replanning to optimize target coverage, dose homogeneity, and avoidance of OAR for the remainder of the treatment prescription.

Conventional simulation

Conventional simulation uses a simulator equipped with kilovoltage imaging and fluoroscopy, in addition to couch and gantry components similar to standard linear accelerators. As with clinical setup, this approach is often reserved for cases requiring rapid treatment delivery. Treatment preparation is similar to clinical setup; however, orthogonal fluoroscopic imaging is used to select isocenter after the radiation oncologist outlines the anticipated field borders using radiopaque markers at the patient surface. Isocenter is then confirmed using orthogonal kilovoltage images. On the linear accelerator, megavoltage portal images may also be taken to verify the selected patient position, target, field size, and couch position.

CT simulation

CT simulation, or virtual simulation, is the most commonly used technique for radiation planning and affords the ability to perform dose calculations based on three-dimensional (3D) volumetric imaging. , As compared with clinical setup and conventional simulation, CT simulation with subsequent 3D planning is associated with a reduction in treatment-related adverse effects. This treatment technique involves the following steps:

  • 1.

    The patient is placed in the optimal treatment position on a flat-top table that approximates the linear accelerator couch.

  • 2.

    Immobilization devices and motion management strategies are selected according to the target location. Note that for dose escalation strategies such as stereotactic radiotherapy, margins are generally minimized to reduce receipt of high doses by adjacent OAR. As such, immobilization and motion management strategies can be increasingly important to use. For brain and cervical spine targets, rigid immobilization using stereotactic head frames or thermoplastic masks that attach to the treatment couch ensure setup accuracy within a few millimeters. For treatment sites not amenable to rigid immobilization, kinematic positioning systems such as HexaPOD (Elekta) can minimize patient setup error to within sub-millimeter levels.

  • 3.

    Radiopaque markers can be used to delineate scars, sites of superficial bleeding or pain, or other anatomic locations that may be useful during treatment plan.

  • 4.

    Tissue equivalent bolus, testicular shielding, and other dose-modifying devices can be applied as indicated.

  • 5.

    The position of the patient and/or immobilization devices are indexed to the couch. The CT simulation system should match the indexing system used on the linear accelerator couch.

  • 6.

    A two-dimensional (2D) topogram, or scout view, is taken to confirm patient alignment and to set the superior-inferior, lateral-medial, and anterior-posterior borders for final CT imaging acquisition.

  • 7.

    Intravenous and/or oral contrast is administered if indicated.

  • 8.

    The final CT image set is captured, according to site-specific imaging protocols. For stereotactic treatments, a thin-slice CT (slice thickness 1 to 2 mm) is generally used.

  • 9.

    The radiation oncologist can elect to set the isocenter at the time of CT simulation or at the time of treatment planning. Either the isocenter or virtual isocenter (“premarks”), respectively, are marked at the patient surface or immobilization device using a laser coordinate system, which is also present in the linear accelerator vault.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here