The FDA Drug Approval Process


Questions

  • Q6.1 In the broadest sense, what are the general areas of oversight by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)? (Pg. 49)

  • Q6.2 Approximately what percentage of the FDA budget comes from user fees? (Pg. 49)

  • Q6.3 Concerning the Food Drug and Cosmetic Law of 1938 and the Kefauver–Harris Drug Amendment of 1962, what is (1) the scope of the laws, and (2) the key impetus for passage of each law? (Pg. 50x2)

  • Q6.4 What is involved in defining a drug ‘label’ and the related ‘off-label use’? (Pg. 51x2)

  • Q6.5 How does the pharmacovigilance process after drug release for marketing differ in the US to several European countries? (Pgs. 51, 53)

  • Q6.6 What are the most important elements of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992? (Pg. 51)

  • Q6.7 Concerning a given FDA Advisory Panel, what is (1) the composition of members, (2) its primary purpose, and (3) its role in approving drugs or taking drugs off the market? (Pg. 51)

  • Q6.8 What general changes were allowed by the FDA Modernization Act of 1997? (Pg. 52)

  • Q6.9 Concerning bioequivalence testing for generic products and product reformulations, what are the testing requirements for (1) systemic drugs, (2) topical corticosteroids, and (3) other topical drugs? (Pg. 52x2)

  • Q6.10 Why are biosimilars likely to be relatively more expensive than traditional ‘generics’? (Pg. 52)

  • Q6.11 What makes regulating precision medicine treatments more difficult than traditional medical treatments? (Pg. 53)

Abbreviations Used in this Chapter

AE

Adverse effect(s)

FADAMA

Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act

FDA

US Food and Drug Administration

IND

Investigative New Drug

NDA

New Drug Application

NME

New Molecular Entity

OTC

Over the counter

RCT

Randomized controlled trial(s)

SAE

Serious adverse effect(s)

Introduction

Q6.1 The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the federal agency charged with regulating all of our foods, human and veterinary drugs, medical devices, biologics, and cosmetics. Although the general public assumes that physicians know a great deal about the FDA, in fact physicians actually receive little education about the FDA in medical school, residency, or other postgraduate training. This may be partly because most FDA activities deal largely with legal issues or social policy. However, science and medical research information is fundamental to carrying out the FDA’s missions, and the agency’s policies have a tremendous impact on public health and on the practice of medicine. The FDA regulatory jurisdiction (direct and indirect control) is estimated to encompass an enormous 20 cents of every dollar Americans spend on products, or 2 cents per day for every American. The FDA is part of the Health and Human Services Department, which is in the executive branch of the federal government. Thus, the FDA Commissioner is appointed by the President, with advice from and the consent of Congress. Q6.2 Until the 1992 imposition of ‘user fees,’ the FDA budget for the drug approval process was almost totally derived from Congress, which also has oversight responsibility for the FDA. The FDA now spends about US$1.4 billion on approving, labeling, and monitoring drugs, with more than 4000 people throughout the agency involved in this process. This amount compares favorably with the US$47 million spent in 1992, before the prescription drug user fees were instituted. In addition to user fees for prescription drugs, FDA now collects user fees for regulation of medical devices, animal drugs, animal generic drugs, and biosimilars. Overall, the FDA budget for the 2017 fiscal year was US$5.1 billion (over half, US$2.7 billion, coming from user fees) with approximately 17,000 employees. Clearly the FDA budget is too small, with too few employees to actively make or supervise all of the decisions affecting 20% of the US product spending. The system therefore depends on a great deal of voluntary self-regulation from the pharmaceutical industry and other regulated industries. This chapter focuses primarily on the approval process for prescription drugs, although much of the information is also applicable to biologics and devices.

Federal Legislation for Drug Safety and Efficacy

Food Drug and Cosmetic Law

Q6.3 The first federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act was enacted in 1938 ( Table 6.1 ). Considerable credit for its passage is given to the author, Sinclair Lewis, whose books describing conditions in the meat packing industry are said to have led to public outrage, and finally, congressional action (See also Chapter 7 concerning diethylene glycol.). Physicians, however, were also active in promoting and creating federal standards. Prior to the 1938 Act, there were no federal standards regarding drug safety or efficacy. This was the era of ‘snake oil’ and elixirs. However, the original Act only required that drugs be proved safe. It was assumed that doctors and patients could work out which drugs were effective, and that market forces would assure the success of only efficacious drugs. The current high cost of drug development has led some to call for a reversion to this standard by approving all safe drugs and allowing clinical experience and market forces to establish clinical efficacy and pick out those indications for which drugs are truly effective.

Table 6.1
Timeline for Major Pharmaceutical Legislation in the United States
Year Legislation Regulating Pharmaceutical Industry
1938 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
1962 Kefauver–Harris Amendment
1983 Orphan Drug Act
1984 Drug Price Competition and Patent Restoration Act
1992 Prescription Drug User Fee Act
1997 Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act (FADAMA)

Kefauver–Harris Drug Amendment

Q6.3 Although thalidomide was never approved by the FDA and was never sold in the United States, the birth defects the drug caused in European patients alarmed the US population so much that in 1962 Congress passed a comprehensive FDA reform bill known as the Kefauver–Harris Drug Amendment. This amendment added the requirement that drugs also be proved effective before they could be marketed. Since then, all potential drugs have been required to be proved both safe and effective before approval for marketing (premarket approval).

General Testing Required Prior to Marketing

To satisfy the premarketing requirements, sponsors (usually pharmaceutical companies) test drugs by a variety of methods, including bioassays, animal models, and finally, human trials ( Table 6.2 ). The process is quite costly (from US$350 million to US$2.6 billion) and takes about 15 years (which is double the time needed in 1964). The wide range in development costs reflects not only the variations inherent in the type of drug and the sponsor’s efficiency, but also a variety of accounting methodologies. For example, the cost of ‘losers’ (drugs that fail at some point in the development process) is typically added as a cost of developing the ‘winners.’ Other factors accounting for the wide range of drug development costs include whether the cited cost is in pretax or after-tax dollars, and whether the lost interest income on the dollars invested in the development process is included.

Table 6.2
US Food and Drug Administration Approval Process
Drug Development Stage Description Average # Years
Laboratory and animal studies 6.5 a
File IND with FDA
Clinical studies
Phase I Pharmacological profile 1.5
Phase II Safety and limited efficacy 2.0
Phase III Extensive trials 3.5
File NDA with FDA
FDA review and approval 1.5
Total for drug development process 15.0
FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; IND, Investigative New Drug; NDA, New Drug Application.

a Patents usually issued relatively early in this time period.

Phase I to IV Testing

For every 5000 pharmaceutical compounds evaluated or screened, five reach the stage of clinical trials, and only about one of these five actually reaches the market after FDA approval (see Table 6.2 ). Of those compounds reaching clinical trials, 70% pass phase I, 33% pass phase II, 33% pass phase III, and 25% to 30% receive an approved New Drug Application (NDA). The sponsors conduct and pay for those studies needed to prove safety and efficacy. The FDA evaluates and judges the test results, but rarely does drug testing. However, the FDA is involved in the sponsor’s test plans, especially those concerning human testing. As potential new drugs have not been proved safe and effective, they may not be given as therapy. The sponsor may give the investigational drug to patients for evaluation (testing) only after submitting an Investigative New Drug (IND) exemption.

Phase I Testing

FDA guidelines for human testing divide the premarket testing process into three phases: I, II, and III. In phase I, patients or healthy volunteers receive the drug in order to study its safety and dosage, along with metabolic and pharmacologic profiles. Usually, phase I testing involves 20 to 100 subjects and the safety testing is general as well as specific, depending upon the toxicities detected in animal studies. Phase I is intended to give enough pharmacokinetic and pharmacologic information to allow the design of controlled clinical studies to be used in phase II.

Phase II Testing

In phase II studies the drug is tested for safety and efficacy to determine the optimal dose or duration to be used in phase III. Phase II usually involves several hundred subjects with the targeted condition.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here