Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Q37.1 What are several drugs commonly associated with mucositis? (Pgs. 406, 409, 414, 415x2, 416x2)
Q37.2 Which drug class is most commonly associated with an acneiform papulopustular eruption? (Pg. 406)
Q37.3 What is the time course of the papulopustular rash following the initiation of therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRI)? (Pg. 406)
Q37.4 Before starting therapy with an EGFRI, what is the recommended prophylactic regimen? (Pg. 406)
Q37.5 What is the most common type of organism cultured from a secondarily infected papulopustular (acneiform) rash? (Pg. 406)
Q37.6 How does the hand–foot syndrome associated with anthracyclines differ from the hand–foot skin reaction induced by sorafenib? (Pg. 413)
Q37.7 Raynaud phenomenon has been associated with which drugs? (Pg. 414x2)
Q37.8 What is the mechanism of action for the following drugs: vorinostat, denileukin diftitox, ipilimumab, and etoposide? (Pgs. 414, 415x2, 417)
Q37.9 What are the indications for dexamethasone in preventing or treating dermatologic AE associated with anticancer drugs? (Pgs. 415x3, 416)
Q37.10 Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of which cutaneous malignancy? (Pg. 415)
Q37.11 What are the criteria for the diagnosis of the capillary leak syndrome induced by denileukin diftitox? (Pg. 416)
Q37.12 How long does cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cuSCC) occur after initiation of drug therapy with vemurafenib? (Pg. 418)
Adverse event
Basal cell carcinoma
Chronic myelogenous leukemia
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans
Epidermal growth factor inhibitor
Food and Drug Administration
Histone deacetylase
Hand–foot syndrome
Hand–foot skin reaction
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Kaposi sarcoma
Merkel cell carcinoma
Mycosis fungoides
Multitargeted kinase inhibitor
Platelet-derived growth factor receptor
Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin
Palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma
Squamous cell carcinoma
Topical corticosteroid
Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor
A special thank you goes to Alyx C. Rosen, Cristina Gómez-Fernández, and Mario E. Lacouture for their efforts on the prior edition.
Important advances have been made in the development of anticancer agents. In particular, the emergence of targeted therapies for the treatment of solid tumors highlights the significance of genetic alterations ( Table 37.1 ). This progress has led to improvements in survival and quality of life in cancer patients, with a concomitant decrease in hematopoietic and nonspecific toxicities. However, the introduction of novel agents has also resulted in the emergence of a new and wide spectrum of dermatologic adverse events (AE).
Generic Name | Trade Name | Company |
---|---|---|
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors | ||
Cetuximab | Erbitux | Bristol-Myers Squibb/Lilly |
Erlotinib | Tarceva | OSI/Roche/Genentech |
Geftinib | Iressa | AstraZeneca |
Panitumumab | Vectibix | Amgen |
Multitargeted Kinase Inhibitors | ||
Sorafenib | Nexavar | Bayer/Onyx |
Imatinib mesylate | Gleevec | Novartis |
Nilotinib | Tasigna | Novartis |
Alkylating Agents | ||
Carboplatin | Paraplatin | Bristol-Myers Squibb |
Cisplatin | Platinol | Bristol-Myers Squibb |
Dacarbazine | DTIC-dome | Bayer |
Topoisomerase Inhibitors | ||
Etoposide | VePesid/Toposar | Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer |
Antimicrotubule Agents (Taxanes) | ||
Paclitaxel | Taxol | Bristol-Myers Squibb |
Docetaxel | Taxotere | Sanofi Aventis |
Anthracyclines | ||
Doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome (pegylated doxorubicin) | Doxil | Janssen |
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors | ||
Romidepsin | Istodax | Celgene |
Vorinostat | Zolinza | Merck |
Monoclonal Antibodies | ||
Denileukin diftitox | Ontak | Eisai Medical Research |
Alemtuzumab | Campath | Genzyme |
Antimetabolites | ||
Gemcitabine | Gemzar | Lilly |
Pralatrexate | Folotyn | Allos |
Capecitabine | Xeloda | Roche/Genentech |
Immunokines | ||
Ipilimumab | Yervoy | Bristol-Myers Squibb |
IL-2 (aldesleukin) | Proleukin | Prometheus Labs |
Braf Inhibitors | ||
Vemurafenib | Zelboraf | Roche/Genentech |
Pd-1 Inhibitors | ||
Pembrolizumab | Keytruda | Merck |
Nivolumab | Opdivo | Bristol-Myers Squibb |
Cutaneous malignancies are the most common form of human neoplasm. Some of the most common dermatologic cancers include melanoma, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), with less frequent malignancies being dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP), Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), Kaposi sarcoma (KS), and cutaneous T- and B-cell lymphoma. Most localized skin tumors are managed surgically, but locally advanced and metastatic disease usually require multimodal therapy, which may include surgery, systemic chemotherapy, and radiation ( Table 37.2 ).
Drug Name | Malignancies Treated |
---|---|
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors | |
Cetuximab | HNSCC, a cuSCC |
Erlotinib | HNSCC, KA, cuSCC |
Gefitinib | cuSCC |
Panitumumab | HNSCC, cuSCC |
Multitargeted Kinase Inhibitors | |
Sorafenib | Angiosarcoma |
Imatinib | DFSP, a melanoma |
Alkylating Agents | |
Carboplatin | SCC, BCC, MCC, melanoma |
Cisplatin | HNSCC, a BCC, MCC, melanoma |
Dacarbazine | Melanoma a |
Topoisomerase Inhibitors | |
Etoposide | MCC, CTCL |
Antimicrotubule Agents (Taxanes) | |
Paclitaxel | KS, a melanoma |
Docetaxel | HNSCC, a KS, melanoma |
Anthracyclines | |
Doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome (pegylated doxorubicin) | KS a |
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors | |
Romidepsin | CTCL a |
Vorinostat | CTCL a |
Monoclonal Antibodies | |
Denileukin diftitox | CTCL a |
Alemtuzumab | CTCL |
Antimetabolites | |
Gemcitabine | CTCL, melanoma |
Pralatrexate | CTCL |
Capecitabine | SCC |
Immunokines | |
Ipilimumab | Melanoma a |
IL-2 | Melanoma a |
Braf Inhibitors | |
Vemurafenib | Melanoma a |
Pd-1 Inhibitors | |
Pembrolizumab | Melanoma a |
Nivolumab | Melanoma a |
a US Food and Drug Administration approval for cutaneous malignancy.
In this chapter, we review the most frequent and clinically significant dermatologic AE associated with the use of anticancer agents for the treatment of dermatologic malignancies ( Tables 37.3 and 37.4 ). Dermatologic AE are classified and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE v4.0) ( Table 37.5 ), a grading scheme used in oncology clinical trials and during oncologic care. It is critical for dermatologists to understand AE associated with anticancer agents, to ensure optimal patient care. A primary goal for the dermatologist should be to manage the AE so that drug therapy can continue when it is showing efficacy.
Agents | Cetuximab, Erlotinib, Gefitinib, Panitumumab | Sorafenib | Imatinib, Nilotinib | Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab | Vemurafenib | Ipilimumab |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Target(S) | Egfr | Vegfr2, Vegfr3, Pdgfr, Raf (A, B, C), FLT3 | Pdgfr, c-Kit | Pd-1 | Brafv 600e | Ctla-4 |
Maculopapular rash | – | + | +/– | + | + | +/– |
Skin neoplasms | – | +/– | – | – | + | – |
Keratosis pilaris | – | – | +/– | +/– | + | – |
Alopecia | +/– | +/– | +/– (N) | + | +/– | – |
Curly hair | + | +/– | – | – | +/– | – |
Injection site/infusion reaction | +/– (P) | – | – | + | – | – |
Photosensitivity | +/– | + | +/– (I) | + (N) | + | – |
PPE or HFS | – | + | – | – | +/– | – |
Mucositis, stomatitis | +/– | + | – | + | – | – |
Facial hair | + | – | – | – | – | – |
Paronychia or nail changes | + | – | – | – | – | – |
Periorbital edema | – | – | + (I) | – | – | – |
Papulopustular (acneiform) rash | + | +/– | – | – | – | – |
Pruritus | + | (Scalp dysesthesia) | +/– | + | +/– | + |
Urticaria | +/– | – | + | + (N) | – | – |
AE Term | Carboplatin, Cisplatin | Dacarbazine | Etoposide | Paclitaxel, Docetaxel | Pegylated Doxorubicin (Pld) | Romidepsin, Vorinostat | Alemtuzumab | Gemcitabine, Pralatrexate Capecitabine |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maculopapular rash | – | + | – | +/– | – | – | +/– | +/– (P) |
Alopecia | + (Ca) | – | + | + | – | + (V) | – | + |
Curly hair | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Injection site/infusion reaction | – | – | – | + (D) | +/– | – | + | – |
Photosensitivity | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – |
PPE or HFS | – | – | + | + | + | – | – | + (C) |
Mucositis, Stomatitis | – | – | + | + (D) | + | – | + | + |
Facial hair | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Paronychia or nail changes | + (Ci) | – | + | + | – | – | – | + (C) |
Periorbital edema | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Papulopustular (acneiform) rash | – | +/– | +/– | +/– | – | – | +/– | – |
Pruritus | – | – | – | + | – | + (R) | + | + (G) |
Urticaria | – | + | – | + | – | – | + | – |
AE Term | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alopecia | Hair loss of <50% of normal for that individual that is not obvious from a distance but only on close inspection; a different hair style may be required to cover the hair loss but it does not require a wig to camouflage | Hair loss of ≥50% normal for that individual that is readily apparent to others; a wig is necessary to completely camouflage the hair loss; associated with psychosocial impact | — | — | — |
Dry skin | Covering <10% BSA and no associated erythema or pruritus | Covering 10%–30% BSA and associated with erythema or pruritus; limit instrumental ADL | Covering >30% BSA and associated with pruritus; limiting self-care ADL | ||
Infusion site extravasation | — | Erythema with associated symptoms (edema, pain, induration, phlebitis) | Ulceration or necrosis; severe tissue damage; operative intervention indicated | Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated | Death |
Injection site reaction | Tenderness with or without associated symptoms (warmth, erythema, itching) | Pain; lipodystrophy; edema; phlebitis | Ulceration or necrosis; severe tissue damage; operative intervention indicated | Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated | Death |
Mucositis | Asymptomatic or mild symptoms; intervention not indicated | Moderate pain; not interfering with oral intake; modified diet indicated | Severe pain; interfering with oral intake | Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated | Death |
Palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome | Minimal skin changes or dermatitis (e.g., erythema, edema, or hyperkeratosis) without pain | Skin changes (e.g., peeling, blisters, bleeding, edema, or hyperkeratosis) with pain; limiting instrumental ADL | Severe skin changes with pain; limiting self-care ADL | — | — |
Papulopustular rash | Papules and/or pustules covering <10% BSA, which may or may not be associated with symptoms of pruritus or tenderness | Papules and/or pustules covering 10%–30% BSA, which may or may not be associated with symptoms of pruritus or tenderness; associated with psychosocial impact; limiting instrumental ADL | Papules and/or pustules covering >30% BSA, which may or may not be associated with symptoms of pruritus or tenderness; limiting self-care ADL; associated with local superinfection with oral antibiotics indicated | Papules and/or pustules covering any % BSA, which may or may not be associated with symptoms of pruritus or tenderness and IV antibiotics indicated; life-threatening consequences | Death |
Paronychia | Nail fold edema or erythema; disruption of the cuticle | Localized or oral intervention indicated; edema or erythema with pain; associated discharge or nail plate separation; limiting instrumental ADL | Surgical intervention or IV antibiotics indicated; limiting self-care ADL | — | — |
Photosensitivity | Painless erythema and erythema covering <10% BSA | Tender erythema covering 10%–30% BSA | Erythema >30% BSA and with blistering; photosensitivity; oral corticosteroid indicated; pain control indicated | Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated | Death |
Pruritus | Mild or localized; topical intervention indicated | Intense or widespread; intermittent; skin changes from scratching; oral intervention indicated; limiting instrumental ADL | Intense or widespread; constant; limiting self-care ADL or sleep; oral corticosteroid or immunosuppressive therapy indicated | — | — |
Rash Maculopapular | Macules/papules covering <10% BSA with or without symptoms (e.g., pruritus, burning, tightness) | Macules/papules covering 10%–30% BSA with or without symptoms; limiting instrumental ADL | Macules/papules covering >30% BSA with or without symptoms; limiting self-care ADL | — | — |
a The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) is the most widely used tool to grade and report adverse effects (AE), with version 4.0, the most recently updated version, published by the United States Department of Health and Human Services on May 19, 2009. The most recent version takes into consideration the degree to which activities of daily living (ADL) are affected (instrumental and self-care ADL for grades 2 and 3 of severity, respectively). It also includes the percentages of body surface area (BSA) affected. A semi-colon indicates ‘or’ within the description of the grade. A single dash (—) indicates a grade is not available. Instrumental ADL refers to preparing meals, shopping for groceries or clothes, using the telephone, managing money, etc. Self-care ADL refers to bathing, dressing and undressing, feeding self, using the toilet, taking medications, and being bedridden. Not all grades are appropriate for all AE. Therefore, some AE are listed with fewer than five options for grade selection. The use of the CTCAE v4.0 is mandatory in most oncology clinical trials, and is useful in the clinical setting, as it ensures communication with oncologists.
Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRI) have been used for treatment of advanced or metastatic cuSCC, based on the similar biologic behavior of cuSCC to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) (see Table 37.1 for individual drug names). EGFR is expressed in the basal and suprabasal layer of the epidermis and plays an important role in regulating cell growth and differentiation. When used against cancer, EGFRI cause coincident alterations in keratinocyte physiology, including premature differentiation, decreased proliferation, and increased apoptosis. The monoclonal antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibody cetuximab has been approved for the treatment of metastatic or recurrent HNSCC, and as primary treatment with radiation for advanced disease. Cetuximab demonstrated efficacy as first-line single-agent therapy in a phase II study of patients with surgically unresectable or metastatic cuSCC with moderate to strong EGFR expression. Cetuximab demonstrated an overall disease control rate and response rate of 69% and 28%, respectively.
Activity against SCC has also been demonstrated with other EGFRI. Erlotinib is currently US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for nonsmall cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer. However, it has also provided palliation for three patients with cuSCC who had failed previous therapies, with one patient reaching a complete response while on therapy and a second patient achieving a partial response. In a phase II trial, patients with metastatic or recurrent SCC were given erlotinib at 150 mg daily every 28 days. Only 10% of patients in the study demonstrated a partial response, 62% had stable disease, and 28% had disease progression. Of the patients in the study, all experienced AE. The most common effects were acneiform rash and fatigue. Additionally, there are case reports of patients with cuSCC treated with cetuximab or erlotinib who have achieved complete or partial responses. Another EGFRI, gefitinib, is currently approved to treat nonsmall cell lung cancer. However, it has shown promise in the treatment of cuSCC. In a phase II study of gefitinib in patients with metastatic or recurrent cuSCC, 4 of 15 evaluable patients had disease stability after 4 weeks of treatment. In a second phase II study, 6 of 37 patients demonstrated a partial response to gefitinib while an additional 13 patients demonstrated disease stability at 8 weeks.
Panitumumab is FDA approved as a single agent for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. It is the first fully humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the EGFR. In a phase II trial of panitumumab in the treatment of incurable cuSCC, 5 of 16 patients demonstrated an overall response (2 with partial response, 3 with complete response). An additional 6 of 16 patients demonstrated stable disease. All patients experienced AE. Those included rash (four being grade 3–4), pruritus, mucositis, nail changes, and other dermatological changes.
Q37.1 Treatment with EGFRI can lead to the development of a wide variety of dermatologic AE, including a papulopustular (acneiform) rash, xerosis, pruritus, mucositis, telangiectasias, hyperpigmentation, and hair and nail changes.
Q37.2 Papulopustular eruption is the most frequent dermatologic toxicity associated with EGFRI, affecting up to 90% of treated patients, with varying incidences depending on the specific EGFRI. The rash is generally distributed in areas rich in sebaceous glands, such as the scalp, face, postauricular areas, neck, shoulders, upper trunk, and chest in a V-shaped pattern. In most patients, the onset of the rash can be seen within the first few days of therapy initiation and the severity peaks at 2 to 3 weeks after starting treatment. Q37.3 Clinically, it presents with erythema, edema, and dysesthesias during the first week. The rash then progresses to erythematous follicular papules that may evolve into pustules during the second and third weeks. Crusts may form on the surface of the lesions ( Fig. 37.1 ). In the second month, persistent erythema with telangiectasias may be observed. Secondary impetiginization can occur in up to 38% of patients, usually attributed to Staphylococcus aureus . The papulopustular eruption associated with EGFRI is distinguished from acne vulgaris by the absence of comedones, associated pruritus, and extension to the scalp and extremities.
Interestingly, the presence and severity of the papulopustular eruption has a positive correlation with tumor response and patient survival in patients treated with cetuximab. Therefore, it is important for oncologists and dermatologists to be able to treat this toxicity to facilitate patient adherence with therapy. Q37.4 Prophylactic treatment with a skin moisturizer, sunscreen, hydrocortisone 1% cream, and oral doxycycline 100 mg twice daily has been shown to reduce the incidence of grade 2 or higher skin toxicity by more than 50% in panitumumab-treated patients and improve patients’ quality of life. Prophylaxis with minocycline 100 mg daily was also shown to reduce the number of lesions in patients treated with cetuximab.
Up to 35% of patients treated with EGFRI can develop xerosis, which typically occurs after 2 to 3 months of therapy. It can increase patients’ susceptibility to superinfection with S. aureus and Gram-negative bacteria. Q37.5 To prevent xerosis, patients should minimize exposure to hot water during bathing or hand-washing, and use alcohol-free emollients to moisturize the skin. Severe cases may require topical corticosteroids (TCS). If infection is suspected, bacterial, viral, and fungal cultures should be obtained to determine appropriate management.
The incidence of hair alterations, including alopecia, facial hirsutism, and trichomegaly, with a potential risk of trichiasis and subsequent corneal ulceration, can reach up to 100%. Furthermore, both the nails and the periungual tissues can be affected; paronychia and periungual pyogenic granulomas can be seen in 12% to 56% of patients. Patients should avoid wearing tight-fitting shoes and should keep nails short. Treatments include topical antibiotics, vinegar soaks, high-potency TCS, and silver nitrate chemical cauterization.
Sorafenib currently has FDA-approved use in the treatment of thyroid carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and renal cell carcinoma. It is an oral multikinase inhibitor that targets receptor tyrosine kinases, including c-Kit, RET, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 1, 2 and 3, in addition to inhibiting the serine/threonine kinase RAF pathway. In addition to its FDA-approved use in the treatment of various carcinomas, sorafenib has demonstrated encouraging results for patients with angiosarcoma. In a phase II trial of sorafenib (800 mg/day), 4 of 37 patients with vascular sarcomas experienced a partial response and one experienced a complete response, although many patients developed dermatologic toxicities that required dose modifications.
The most frequently observed dermatologic AE with sorafenib include rash/desquamation, hand–foot skin reaction (HFSR), alopecia, facial erythema, nail changes, and pruritus. Q37.1 Other less commonly reported cutaneous AE are stomatitis, mucositis, eruptive benign nevi, and keratoacanthomas/SCC. HFSR is characterized by tender blisters with an erythematous halo localized to areas of increased pressure on the hands and feet ( Fig. 37.2 ). Painful hyperkeratosis and desquamation may occur later on, which significantly affect patients’ quality of life and limit activities of daily living. Symptoms typically occur within the first 2 to 4 weeks of sorafenib treatment. Q37.6 Results of a recent meta-analysis showed the incidence of all-grade and high-grade HFSR with sorafenib to be 34% and 9%, respectively. HFSR differs from palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) or hand–foot syndrome (HFS) associated with conventional cytotoxic agents, which is characterized by diffuse and symmetric erythema and edema of the palms and soles. Pre-emptive management of HFSR includes removing calluses, wearing cotton or wool socks and padded orthotic shoes, avoiding friction to the palms and soles, and application of urea 10% cream. Symptomatic treatment depends on the severity of the cutaneous findings. Different treatments, such as clobetasol 0.05% and topical urea 40%, have shown anecdotal benefit. If patients develop intolerable grade 2 or grade 3 skin changes with an impact on activities of daily living, dose modification may be necessary. Pain management is the most important aspect to control during this toxicity.
Imatinib mesylate has been approved as a single agent for the treatment of DFSP, systemic mastocytosis, and chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). It is a potent and specific inhibitor of several protein kinases, including BCR-ABL, c-Kit, and PDGFR. Imatinib is additionally under investigation for treatment of melanoma, desmoid tumors, and KS. In KS there is an upregulation of both c-Kit and PDGFR, which leads to KS proliferation. As imatinib inhibits the aforementioned receptors, it has been used in a phase II study in the treatment of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related KS. In the study, imatinib demonstrated significant activity against AIDS-related KS.
A small subgroup of melanomas arising from acral and mucosal surfaces and chronically sun-damaged skin have been found to harbor KIT gene alterations. Two recent phase II studies have demonstrated that imatinib has significant clinical activity against metastatic melanoma in patients with proven genetic c-Kit aberrations.
Cutaneous AE to imatinib are common and have been reported in 9.5% to 69% of patients. One of the most common dermatologic toxicities is edema that involves the periorbital region in up to 70% of patients. A wide variety of additional skin toxicities have been reported, including urticaria, maculopapular exanthem, pityriasis rosea-like eruption, skin hypopigmentation, Sweet syndrome, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, exacerbation of psoriasis, pseudoporphyria, mycosis fungoides (MF)-like reaction, and oral and cutaneous lichenoid eruption. In one study, the most common AE was a nonspecific skin rash, which developed in 33.9% of patients. The skin eruptions appear to be dose dependent, with mild reactions to doses of 200 to 600 mg daily, and more severe reactions to high doses of 800 to 1000 mg daily. Generally, most cutaneous AE secondary to imatinib therapy do not require cessation of the drug and are rather self-limited in nature. If cutaneous AE occur, oral or topical corticosteroids (CS) may be prescribed to help alleviate symptoms.
Nilotinib is currently approved for patients with newly diagnosed or previously treated CML. Nilotinib functions as a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of BCR-ABL, c-Kit, and PDGF. It has similar efficacy to imatinib mesylate but a better tolerated AE profile. Additionally, it has greater selectivity and potency than imatinib and was developed following resistance to imatinib. One phase II trial of nilotinib in patients with metastatic melanoma harboring the Kit gene mutation demonstrated a 26.2% response rate (all partial response) in patients receiving nilotinib therapy. Of patients enrolled in the trial, 47.6% showed stable disease. Clinical trials assessing the efficacy of nilotinib in DFSP have yet to be conducted.
Several dermatologic AE have been reported in patients treated with nilotinib. A phase II study of nilotinib in patients with CML reported the incidence of all-grade rash to be 28%, of which 3% were high grade. Pruritus occurred in 24% of treated patients. Xerosis, eczema, flushing, urticaria, and edema have also been reported with varying incidences. Additionally, up to 10% of patients experience alopecia with nilotinib. Patients who experience AE can receive a trial of topical or oral CS, which has been shown to be effective in alleviating symptoms.
The alkylating agents (which include cisplatin, carboplatin, and dacarbazine) function by altering deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) structure, thus leading to impaired DNA replication and subsequent apoptosis of cancer cells. Platinum-based chemotherapy is active against advanced SCC and BCC. Patients with these advanced skin cancers are typically older and so caution and consideration of comorbidities and potential serious AE are necessary when using these cytotoxic therapies.
Carboplatin and cisplatin, either as single agents or in combined chemotherapy regimens, are also used in the treatment of MCC. However, the results of clinical trials have not demonstrated an improvement in recurrence or survival of MCC with adjuvant chemotherapy. Further studies are needed to assess the role of systemic chemotherapy after local treatment, in particular for patients with lymph node-positive disease who have a high risk of distant recurrence.
Carboplatin is FDA approved for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. The most common cutaneous AE to carboplatin is alopecia. It is more severe after cycles of treatment or if carboplatin is administered concomitantly with other chemotherapeutic drugs. The incidence of a hypersensitivity reaction is about 2%, and management depends on the severity, but may include premedication with antihistamines, desensitization protocols, or discontinuation of the drug.
Cisplatin is approved for the treatment of HNSCC that is locally advanced and cannot be treated with surgery. It is additionally used alone or in conjunction with carboplatin in the treatment of MCC. One of the most frequent cutaneous AE of cisplatin is permanent, localized, patchy hyperpigmentation which affects up to 70% of treated patients. Q37.7 It can involve the dorsal surfaces of extremities, the nails, elbows, knees, neck, or sites of pressure. It may also cause oral hyperpigmentation, hair color changes, hypersensitivity reactions, exfoliative dermatitis, flushing, inflammation of actinic keratoses, and Raynaud phenomenon, which occurs when cisplatin is administered with other chemotherapeutic agents. Nail changes include leukonychia, Beau lines, and diffuse nail hyperpigmentation. A case of porphyria after treatment with cisplatin has also been reported.
Dacarbazine is FDA approved in the treatment of metastatic melanoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. As monotherapy for melanoma, this drug has been associated with a response rate of 7% to 12% but does not increase survival. Higher response rates have been seen in combination chemotherapy regimens. This is exemplified by a recent phase III study in which patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab plus dacarbazine versus dacarbazine alone experienced significant improvement in overall survival (11.2 vs. 9.1 months). In another phase III trial, patients with metastatic melanoma receiving fotemustine monotherapy had superior overall response rates compared with patients receiving dacarbazine monotherapy. Cutaneous toxicities of dacarbazine include erythematous, macular, papular, and/or urticarial rash, alopecia, nail hyperpigmentation, phototoxicity reactions, flushing, and fixed drug eruptions.
Q37.8 Etoposide has FDA approval for use in small cell lung cancer as well as testicular cancer. Etoposide functions by inhibiting topoisomerase II, an enzyme involved in DNA unwinding, and thus causing breakage of DNA strands. Etoposide has also been used off-label in the treatment of MCC. Etoposide in combination with a platinum agent (cisplatin or carboplatin) is the most common chemotherapy for MCC. Although the potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in MCC is unclear, several studies have proposed the addition of carboplatin and etoposide to radiotherapy for the management of MCC. However, when MCC patients treated with adjuvant radiation, carboplatin, and etoposide were compared with MCC patients who had been treated with surgery and radiation therapy alone, there was no significant improvement in any clinical endpoints.
Etoposide has also demonstrated some benefit as monotherapy and in combined regimens for the treatment of advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). There are several ongoing studies evaluating etoposide in combination chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of relapsed or refractory CTCL and previously untreated disease. One study has shown etoposide monotherapy as effective in the treatment of MF with a 69% patient response rate.
Q37.1 Many cutaneous AE to etoposide have been described, including alopecia, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, pigmentation of nail beds and fingers, onycholysis, Beau lines, PPE, mucositis, radiation recall dermatitis, and flushing. Q37.7 When etoposide is administered in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents, several additional reactions have been observed, including Raynaud phenomenon, skin hyperpigmentation, and hypersensitivity reactions.
Paclitaxel is currently FDA approved for the treatment of AIDS-related KS. It functions by stabilizing microtubules and inhibiting their disassembly, thereby inhibiting cellular replication. It is currently being evaluated in combination chemotherapy regimens for its efficacy in metastatic melanoma. One phase III trial examined the efficacy of nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel versus dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma. Nab-paclitaxel differs from paclitaxel in that it is albumin-bound and solvent free, which is meant to decrease AE associated with solvent and increase drug delivery through its binding to albumin. Median progression-free survival was 4.8 months in the nab-paclitaxel group versus 2.5 months in the dacarbazine group. The overall response rate was 15% and 11% (nab-paclitaxel and dacarbazine, respectively). Taxane-based chemotherapy has also demonstrated promising antitumor activity for patients with metastatic angiosarcoma.
A wide range of skin toxicities to paclitaxel treatment have been reported, including hypersensitivity reactions, radiation recall dermatitis, erythema multiforme, and reversible alopecia involving the eyebrows, eyelashes, scalp, and axillary and pubic regions. Nail changes are also prevalent and commonly reported to be painful. In a clinical trial of weekly paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer, nail toxicity, which included discoloration, paronychia, onycholysis, exudation, and subungual hemorrhages, occurred in 27.6% (16/58) of patients. Additional nail changes caused by paclitaxel may include nail ridging and hyperpigmentation of the hyponychia. Q37.9 Routine premedication with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and an H 2 antihistamine is recommended before paclitaxel infusion owing to its vehicle, Chremophor EL, inducing immediate hypersensitivity reactions.
Docetaxel is FDA approved for use in combination with cisplatin and fluorouracil for the induction treatment of patients with inoperable, locally advanced HNSCC. Docetaxel shares a similar mechanism of action to paclitaxel, but it may also inhibit VEGF and it displays immunomodulatory properties. Docetaxel has demonstrated efficacy in advanced-stage AIDS-related KS, including several cases of patients pretreated with anthracyclines, paclitaxel, or other systemic chemotherapy. Like paclitaxel, docetaxel also demonstrated antitumor activity and a favorable prognosis for patients with metastatic angiosarcoma. Additionally, docetaxel has been investigated for its efficacy in patients with metastatic melanoma.
Q37.1 Dermatologic toxicities associated with docetaxel include PPE, mucositis, alopecia, erythema, pruritus, macular eruption, and desquamation. PPE associated with taxanes, and particularly docetaxel, has more accurately been described as periarticular thenar erythema with onycholysis (PATEO) syndrome, which is clinically different from the PPE caused by MKI, capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/doxorubicin. PATEO syndrome involves tender or pruritic erythema on the dorsum of the hands, along with subungual hemorrhages leading to nail separation and infection in up to 30% of treated patients. Nail changes can also occur independently of PATEO syndrome and are seen in up to 58% of patients. Specifically, the nail changes include onycholysis, Beau lines, onychomelanosis, onychomadesis, subungual erythema, and subungual hemorrhages. High-potency TCS and gel-containing frozen gloves and socks used during docetaxel infusion have led to reduce nail toxicities. Q37.9 Oral dexamethasone therapy is recommended for the treatment of grade ≥2 PPE. If drug extravasation occurs, docetaxel acts as an irritant causing local pain, erythema, bullae, or phlebitis to the affected area. These manifestations resolve over weeks but can leave residual hyperpigmentation.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here