Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
When a patient awakens from anesthesia after surgery, they usually look at their wound site to see how big the incisional bandage is. Usually, the patient and their family are relieved to hear that the operation was a success and believe the whole ordeal is over, even though patients are generally informed before surgery that unexpected events, including infections, can develop during their recovery, even after discharge. Such healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a considerable burden to the patient and the healthcare delivery system. These events alter a patient's expected course delaying full recovery and increasing the risk of undesirable outcomes such as death and disability. In this chapter, we describe HAIs with a focus on surgical site infections (SSIs) and outline the methods that help reduce their occurrence.
HAIs can be acquired within any healthcare setting, even in medical offices, laboratories, and ambulatory sites. However, the perioperative setting presents a particularly high-risk environment given the metabolic derangements and damage resulting from the surgical manipulation of tissues, alteration of tissue perfusion, and other transient disruptions of homeostasis. HAIs jeopardize surgical outcomes and increase a patient's length of stay, morbidity, and mortality resulting in billions of dollars in additional healthcare costs. There are multiple opportunities along the health delivery process where healthcare teams can intervene to reduce HAI and improve the outcomes. All interprofessional healthcare team members have a role to play in infection prevention. For a surgical case, practices can be instituted before, during, and after surgery to reduce the risks of infections.
Increasingly, the rates of postsurgical infections at a hospital are accessible by the general public, and, often, detailed data are available for individual procedures and surgeons. These and other types of clinical quality data, such as patient mortality and patient satisfaction, may be used to determine payment for services and for accreditation decisions. Guidelines reflecting best practices to reduce infections have been established, and healthcare agencies promote and monitor the implementation of such practices. For example, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) tracks the rates of major complications after common surgical procedures ( https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/QualityMeasures ). In the United States, validated national standards of care and treatment processes, or Core Quality Measures, reflect the quality of care a hospital provides and allow stakeholders in the healthcare system to assess and compare provider organizations to reduce complications and improve patient outcomes. Compliance with Core Measures demonstrates the commitment of healthcare organizations to achieve optimal outcomes.
Common HAIs associated with perioperative care include postoperative pneumonia (including VAP), catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs), and SSIs, discussed below. In all cases, strict handwashing between patients and appropriate prophylactic antibiotics help decrease the transfer of microorganisms to patients. To be considered an HAI, the infection must occur after 48 h of initial admission, and the identification of the infection should not be present at the time of admission. VAP is determined to be an acquired condition if it occurs 48–72 h after endotracheal intubation. Table 12.1 outlines the criteria for an infection to qualify as HAI.
CAUTI |
|
CRBSI |
|
Pneumonia |
|
CDI |
|
SSIs are infections at or near surgical incisions within 30 days of an operative procedure and account for 15% of all nosocomial infections. They are the leading type of HAIs occurring between 2% and 5% of patients having surgery and are associated with a 2- to 11-fold increase in mortality. They increase the cost of healthcare by $20,842 per admission leading to over a billion dollars yearly in direct expenditures and nearly another billion in readmission costs. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) of the United States estimated that over 110,000 SSIs are associated with inpatient surgeries annually, accounting for 20% of all HAIs, resulting in an estimated cost of $3.3 billion. Rates of SSIs appear to be decreasing modestly due to the considerable focus on eliminating preventable patient harm by provider organizations ( https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf ).
The surveillance period for SSIs begins on the day of surgery and lasts either 30 or 90 days, depending on the type of surgery. The CDC defines two major SSI categories: incisional and organ space infections ( Table 12.2 ). Incisional SSIs can be “ superficial” involving only skin and subcutaneous tissue, and “deep,” involving underlying soft tissues such as fascia or muscle.
Superficial incisional SSI | Deep space SSI | Organ/space SSI | |
---|---|---|---|
Time after procedure | Within 30 days | Within 30–90 days | Within 30–90 days |
Layer of involvement | Skin and subcutaneous tissue | Deep soft tissue—fascial and muscle layer | Body space deeper than fascial/muscle layer |
And at least one of |
|
|
|
Not including |
|
Many perioperative strategies may be able to reduce the risk of infection substantially. In the following section, we identify several factors that help reduce SSIs.
Surgical procedures can inflict significant stress on the body. Strategies to optimize nutritional status and lower perioperative risk are described in Chapter 8 , Prehabilitation and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. In general, the most common factors that can increase the risk of infection are smoking, diabetes, obesity, and coincident remote site infections or colonization with virulent strains such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Cigarette smoking is a leading cause of morbidity and may negatively impact wound healing and the body's immunologic response to injury. Studies show that smoking cessation for as little as 4 weeks before surgery significantly reduces incisional wound infection. In addition, frailty can predispose patients to life-threatening infectious complications.
The association between SSI and diabetes remains controversial. However, several studies show a positive correlation between elevated perioperative blood glucose levels and increased SSI rates. Similarly, obesity has been linked to higher rates of SSI. This may be connected to an increased risk of diabetes, suboptimal physical conditioning, and other factors associated with obese patients. Moreover, a more extensive layer of adipose tissue with limited blood supply through which the incision has to be carried, along with the use of electrocautery, can result in fat necrosis leading to wound infection.
Nasal colonization of S. aureus , found in approximately 10%–30% of the general population, constitutes a risk factor for SSIs. Preoperative strategies to reduce risk include selectively screening all patients for MRSA and treating identified carriers. Alternatively, all patients undergoing surgery may undergo treatment of suspected colonization immediately prior to surgery. , The efficacy of intranasal mupirocin for decolonization and SSI prevention has been demonstrated in several clinical studies, particularly in patients undergoing cardiothoracic and orthopedic surgeries. However, concern about increasing mupirocin resistance and treatment failures has resulted in the exploration of other nasal decolonization agents including chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine compounds. In a meta-analysis report by Tang et al. conducted on 20 relevant randomized controlled trials published between 1996 and 2019 involving 10,526 patients, nasal decolonization of S. aureus using chlorhexidine was associated with a reduction in SSIs in patients undergoing surgery. Although additional studies are needed to understand the impact of preoperative nasal decolonization, most preoperative protocols include a strategy to address nasal colonization.
The effectiveness of showering or bathing with antiseptic soap to reduce skin contamination before surgery in reducing SSI has not convincingly been proven although it remains a part of most preoperative protocols. , , Removal of hair over surgical areas has been traditionally done with the idea that hair may be a reservoir of infectious agents and that skin antisepsis can be better accomplished. However, routine preoperative hair removal has not decreased the incidence of SSIs. In cases where excessive hair may interfere with wound closure, clipping is the preferred method. Clipping has been shown to have lower SSI rates when compared to shaving, which may result in abrasion of the epidermis and folliculitis.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here