Surgical Approaches, Cardiopulmonary Bypass, and Mechanical Circulatory Support in Children


For infants and children, mechanical support of the circulation has important roles in providing short-term circulatory support for reversible myocardial failure, in providing cardiopulmonary support before and after cardiac surgery, and in providing longer-term support as a potential bridge to cardiac transplantation. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) modalities commonly available include extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation, and ventricular assist devices (VADs). Although a variety of assist devices are available for adult-size patients, the need for miniaturization has delayed their application in children. ECMO therefore remains the most common form of MCS for pediatric patients. ECMO was first introduced to provide respiratory support in pediatric patients with severe lung disease failing mechanical ventilator support. Some institutions with an established ECMO program have been able to transition this methodology to provide biventricular support and oxygenation in pediatric patients with a failing circulation. There are no established guidelines for the indications or management of cardiac ECMO support, and there is considerable inter-institutional variability with respect to use and outcomes, based on local experience and philosophy. VADs offer the potential for both short- and long-term support of circulation in patients who do not have concurrent pulmonary parenchymal or vascular disease, and there is increasing experience in developing this form of support as an effective longer-term bridge to transplantation in the pediatric patients with heart disease.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Overview of Uses

The use of ECMO to support children with impaired gas exchange failing to respond to mechanical ventilation as a result of acute respiratory disease is now an accepted and successful therapy. This is particularly true in neonates with a variety of parenchymal and vascular lung diseases (e.g., meconium aspiration, respiratory distress syndrome, diaphragmatic hernia, persistent hypertension of the newborn) survival outcomes are excellent with the use of ECMO. Good ECMO outcomes in these patients depends on the early diagnosis of severe pulmonary failure, the prompt institution of ECMO, and the reversible nature of the pulmonary dysfunction. However, the advent of other therapies, such as high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, surfactant therapy, permissive hypercapnia, and inhaled nitric oxide, has led to a reduction in the need for ECMO in neonates. According to the cumulative data on 55,658 patients reported by the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry, 75% of all neonates who have been placed on ECMO for respiratory support have survived to discharge from hospital ( Table 109-1 ). The outcome for older patients with respiratory failure is considerably lower, with the reported cumulative survival for pediatric and adult patients placed on ECMO for respiratory support being approximately 57% and 56%, respectively.

TABLE 109-1
Survival after ECMO Support
From Extracorporeal Life Support Organization: International Summary, July 2013.
Age Group and Indication No. of Patients No. That Survived to Discharge
Neonates
Respiratory 26,583 19.818 (75%)
Cardiac 5,159 2,078 (40%)
ECPR 914 358 (39%)
Pediatric Age Group
Respiratory 5,923 3,359 (57%)
Cardiac 6,459 3,197 (49%)
ECPR 1,878 770 (41%)
Adults
Respiratory 4,382 2,439 (56%)
Cardiac 3,401 1,349 (40%)
ECPR 969 267 (28%)
Total 55,668 33,635 (60%)
ECMO, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; ECPR , ECMO for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

The past decade has seen a steady increase in the number of patients and institutions using ECMO to support a failing circulation, both after congenital cardiac surgery or as a bridge to transplantation. Another growing indication for ECMO is its use during resuscitation from cardiac arrest. ECMO can be deployed rapidly during cardiac arrest in patients failing to respond to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation; however, ECMO use and efficacy in promoting survival when used for this indication is controversial.

Despite the increased enthusiasm for ECMO support of the circulation, the survival to discharge as reported by the ELSO registry (40% for neonates and 49% for pediatric patients) has not changed much over the past decade ( Fig. 109-1 ) and has lagged considerably when compared with the experience with respiratory ECMO ( Table 109-2 ). The majority of cardiac patients are given ECMO after cardiac surgery. Adverse outcomes after cardiac ECMO are primarily related to irreversible underlying cardiac disease and to the presence of significant end-organ injury before ECMO deployment. Recovery from severe myocardial dysfunction while on mechanical support can occur, provided the myocardium has only sustained a transient and reversible injury. ECMO facilitates ventricular recovery by reducing myocardial wall tension, increasing coronary perfusion pressure, and maintaining systemic perfusion with oxygenated blood.

FIGURE 109-1, Number of cardiac extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) runs and survival rates for all patients receiving cardiac ECMO support reported to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry over a 10-year period.

TABLE 109-2
Neonatal Respiratory and Cardiac ECMO: Differences in Survival Reported by the ELSO Registry for Specific Diagnostic Groups
From Extracorporeal Life Support Organization: International Summary, July 2013.
Diagnosis Survival (%)
Meconium aspiration syndrome 94
Primary pulmonary hypertension 77
Sepsis 73
Air leak syndrome 73
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia 51
Cardiac disease 40
ECMO, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; ELSO, Extracorporeal Life Support Organization.

In infants, in whom myocardial failure is frequently biventricular and associated with respiratory insufficiency or pulmonary hypertension, ECMO is the preferred means of mechanical support. Although there has been some support for the concept of “resting the lungs” for patients who are given ECMO for respiratory failure and lung injury, in cardiac patients in who ejection is present, coronary blood flow is often from left ventricular ejection. Mechanical ventilation with increased fraction of inspired oxygen concentration in inspired air can increase oxygen content of blood returned to the left heart and thus can improve myocardial oxygen delivery and may promote recovery. The heart must regain contractile function and conduction as soon as possible to maintain a workload and to avoid involution of the myocardial mass. This requires frequent evaluation, often with echocardiography, and it is critical that overdistention of the heart be avoided.

It also is important to appreciate the differences between the ECMO circuit and management, and the routine cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) used during cardiac surgery. The ECMO circuit is a closed circuit. It has limited ability to handle any air in the venous limb of the circuit, and careful de-airing of both the arterial and venous cannulas is essential when connecting to the ECMO circuit. The average duration for cardiac ECMO runs reported to ELSO over the past 15 years has increased slightly from approximately 4 to 5 days to about 5 to 7 days; the longest reported run is 62 days. These data emphasize that ECMO should be viewed only as a relatively short-term support of the circulation; beyond 7 days of ECMO support, the chances of successful decannulation and survival decrease substantially. These data also support the need to develop longer-term mechanical support devices, particularly as a bridge to transplantation for patients on ECMO who remain suitable candidates for cardiac transplantation.

The significant time limitation associated with cardiac ECMO use indicates that, ideally, only patients with known reversible cardiac disease should be considered candidates for cardiac ECMO. However, this is often not possible when a quick decision needs to be made to place a patient on ECMO because of cardiac arrest or a severe low cardiac output state. In general, institutions with an efficient and well-established ECMO service are more likely to use this form of support for the failing circulation. However, differences in decision making regarding ECMO candidacy and timing of ECMO deployment, case type and surgical complexity, surgical technique and CPB management used, and many other confounding factors make comparison of efficacy of ECMO among institutions difficult. However, one can make a case that ECMO should be readily available in any center undertaking complex congenital cardiac surgery, as it can provide effective short-term cardiac support while awaiting myocardial recovery in some patients improving their probability of survival. Establishing a structured and coordinated team approach to cannulation is a key step for any successful ECMO service. In our experience at Boston Children's Hospital, the introduction of a dedicated cardiac ECMO program and development of a rapid response system for its use during active resuscitation has contributed to an increase in the survival-to-discharge rate for ECMO circulatory support, from 45% in 1995 to 59% in 2002, regardless of the diagnosis or indication for cardiac support.

Indications

There is no specific cardiac procedure or diagnostic group for which ECMO is a proven therapy. Rather than trying to determine indications for cardiac ECMO according to specific diagnoses or procedures, the indications can be examined in five broad categories: preoperative resuscitation; inability to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass; postcardiotomy; cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, and bridge to transplantation; and after in-hospital cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). According to the ELSO Registry report of outcomes based on broad diagnostic categories, patients given ECMO because of complications related to fulminant myocarditis have the highest survival rate ( Table 109-3 ), although it lags behind the successful outcomes achieved with ECMO for respiratory support in neonates. The survival from cardiac ECMO to hospital discharge according to selected congenital defects is shown in Table 109-4 .

TABLE 109-3
Survival for Cardiac ECMO Runs Based on Broad Diagnostic Categories
From Extracorporeal Life Support Organization: International Summary, July 2013.
Diagnosis Survival (%)
Congenital cardiac defect 39
Cardiac arrest 28
Cardiogenic shock 38
Cardiomyopathy 60
Myocarditis 50
ECMO, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

TABLE 109-4
Survival for Selected Congenital Cardiac Defects by Age and Diagnosis
From Extracorporeal Life Support Organization: International Summary, July 2013.
Diagnosis Neonates (%) Infants (%)
Left-right shunt 37 43
Left obstruction 33 40
Hypoplastic left heart syndrome 32 40
Right obstruction 43 49
Cyanosis (with increased pulmonary blood flow) 34 42
Total anomalous pulmonary venous return 43 42
Cyanosis (with decreased pulmonary blood flow) 40 41
Other 45 51

Preoperative Resuscitation

ECMO can be beneficial for critically ill patients awaiting cardiac surgery, enabling preoperative stabilization and optimization or prevention of end-organ dysfunction before repair. These patients represent a small group (usually newborns), and indications include severely low cardiac output states (e.g., critical aortic stenosis), pulmonary hypertension (e.g., obstructed total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage), and severe hypoxemia (e.g., transposition of the great arteries and pulmonary hypertension).

Inability to Wean from Cardiopulmonary Bypass

The reported survival is poor for patients who are given ECMO because they were unable to wean directly from CPB in the operating room (i.e., without any period of stability off CPB). Issues such as primary myocardial dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension, severe hypoxemia, and refractory dysrhythmias are recognized as major factors in determining successful outcome, but unrecognized residual or irreparable defects are also important. Residual cardiac defects must be investigated in the operating room, using a combination of echocardiography and the careful measurement of oxygen saturations and intracardiac pressures. Ideally, only children with potentially reversible myocardial injury who cannot be weaned from CPB should be considered candidates for ECMO; however, this can be extremely difficult to determine in the operating room immediately after cardiac surgery. Additional considerations for use of ECMO in patients failing to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass after cardiac surgery include preoperative condition, intraoperative course, and the likelihood of being a transplant candidate. Severe hemorrhage is a major problem in the transition from the CPB circuit to the ECMO circuit. Although a lower activated clotting time (ACT; 160 to 180 seconds) can be used, small doses of protamine are often necessary to assist with the initial control of bleeding. We usually administer protamine in 1-mg/kg increments until a target ACT of 180 seconds is achieved. Infusions of antifibrinolytic drugs such as tranexamic acid (bolus of 100 mg/kg, followed by infusion at 10 mg/kg/hr), or ε-aminocaproic acid (bolus of 100 mg/kg, followed by infusion at 30 mg/kg/hr) should be considered. Exploration of the chest may be necessary, particularly if the bleeding persists at a rate greater than 10 mL/kg/hr and if problems with ECMO flow are encountered because of decreased venous cannula drainage from a tamponade-like effect. The large transfusion requirement can place a considerable burden on the supply of donor blood products. As an alternative, it is possible to connect a chest tube to cell-saver tubing to enable blood to be collected in the cell-saver reservoir and subsequently spun for retransfusion.

When a patient requires ECMO in the operating room, discussions with the patient's family must be clear and direct. Recovery of myocardial function should be expected within 2 to 3 days, and if this is not evident, either listing for cardiac transplantation, if appropriate, or withdrawal from support must be considered.

After Cardiotomy

ECMO is an effective therapeutic option for infants and children who have had a period of relative stability after successful termination of CPB and exclusion of significant residual cardiac defects. Myocardial or respiratory failure causing a low cardiac output state, hypoxemia, or pulmonary hypertension and cardiac arrest are the major indications in this group. This group of patients is large, with reported good survival rates (60% to 70%), provided ECMO is instituted rapidly and effectively.

Cardiomyopathy, Myocarditis, and Bridge to Transplantation

Patients with acute fulminant myocarditis can be managed successfully with ECMO. Patients with fulminant myocarditis may arrive at the hospital undergoing full cardiac arrest, but more commonly they are in cardiogenic shock from an extremely low cardiac output state or they have hemodynamically significant dysrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia or heart block. The heart is usually distended and is contracting poorly. Prompt institution of ECMO may allow sufficient resuscitation and stabilization to prevent end-organ injury and to enable the myocardium to rest while awaiting potential recovery. After ECMO is instituted, the heart must be fully decompressed, and urgent atrial septostomy or left atrial vent placement may be necessary. The heart might not begin to eject for the first 24 to 36 hours after ECMO is started, although recovery of electrical activity within the first few hours should be expected. If recovery of ventricular ejection is not evident within 2 to 3 days, ECMO can be continued either as a bridge to heart transplantation or as a bridge to alternative longer-term support with a VAD, if feasible. ECMO should be viewed as a short-term bridge to transplantation because of the limited donor availability and the time-related risks for complications, such as infection, bleeding, end-organ impairment, problems resulting from immobilization, and difficulties in maintaining adequate nutrition. In our experience at Boston Children's Hospital, the median time spent on ECMO awaiting heart transplantation is currently 140 hours (range, 26 to 556 hours), and only 50% of our listed patients have been effectively bridged. In a small number of older and larger children, ECMO has been used to initially resuscitate the circulation and end-organs, and if a donor heart has not become available by day 6 or 7 of ECMO, we have successfully transitioned from ECMO to longer-term VAD. Survival for patients with acute myocarditis supported with ECMO was recently reported to be 61% using data reported to the ECMO registry of ELSO. Because ECMO can provide good survival in any patients with acute fulminant myocarditis these patients should be cared for in facilities that have an ECMO or other MCS options.

ECMO also has been used to support the failing heart after transplantation. This may be necessary immediately after transplantation because of graft failure, usually in the setting of pulmonary hypertension and acute right ventricle failure of the donor heart. ECMO also is effective in supporting the heart during periods of acute rejection. The inflammation and myocardial edema are similar to that seen with fulminant myocarditis, and they lead to a similar spectrum of clinical features. ECMO allows the transplanted heart to decompress with decreased wall tension while antirejection therapy is increased. In our experience, survival to discharge for this indication is currently 64%, and the median duration of ECMO support is 4 days.

After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and CPR

Survival and outcome after in-hospital resuscitation of pediatric patients after a cardiac arrest continues to be extremely poor. Even in a highly monitored and resource-intensive area such as a pediatric intensive care unit (ICU), the survival rate after cardiac arrest has been reported to be only 9% to 31%. The duration of cardiac arrest and resuscitation is also an important determinant of subsequent outcome, and a number of reports have noted a critical threshold of approximately 15 minutes. ECMO has been successfully used to support children after prolonged periods of cardiac arrest that have been unresponsive to closed or open cardiac massage and all other usual interventions. Again, it is important to emphasize that the underlying lesion, in conjunction with the effectiveness of CPR while instituting ECMO, is a major determinant of outcome when mechanical support is used in this setting. Although the exact place of ECMO in the CPR algorithm remains ill defined, patients with a witnessed arrest and rapid institution of effective CPR, and who have no apparent recovery of cardiac function within 5 to 10 minutes of initiating resuscitation and no contraindications, may be suitable candidates for ECMO.

Determining the relative contraindications to ECMO support during active resuscitation attempts can be difficult ( Table 109-5 ). Although not always possible, discussions regarding the use of ECMO in certain patients should be undertaken before an event occurs. We have been able to successfully use our rapid-response ECMO system during CPR in patients with acquired and structural heart disease, and in patients with double- or single-ventricle defects. In the latter group are neonates who have had a sudden, reversible event, such as acute thrombosis and obstruction to a systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt after a Norwood procedure, and they have been readily resuscitated with ECMO. On the other hand, patients with cavopulmonary corrections (i.e., Fontan or bidirectional Glenn anastomosis) have been difficult to resuscitate using ECMO, in part because of limitations with cannulation, and an inability to maintain adequate systemic oxygen delivery and avoid cerebral venous hypertension during CPR with chest compressions. Although we have used ECMO in the resuscitation of patients with pulmonary hypertension and patients with systemic outflow obstruction, the severe limitation to cardiac output and oxygenations during CPR in these patients has meant that their overall outcomes on ECMO have been poor because of the development of severe end-organ injury.

TABLE 109-5
ECMO Support during Active Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Resuscitation Event Considerations
Indications
  • Event witnessed and monitored (e.g., tamponade, arrhythmia, systemic to pulmonary artery shunt, obstruction)

  • Immediate and effective basic life support and CPR

  • No response to advanced life support in 10 min

  • Acceptable cardiac transplant candidate (e.g., fulminant myocarditis)

  • In-hospital event: ICU, OR, catheterization laboratory

  • Effective ECMO system and resources

  • Primed circuit (vacuumed or crystalloid)

  • Equipment and personnel immediately available

Absolute Contraindications
  • Event not witnessed or monitored

  • Known comorbidities that preclude listing for transplantation

  • Out-of-hospital arrest

  • Other congenital or chromosomal abnormalities

  • Sepsis

  • Central nervous system injury

  • Renal failure

Relative Contraindications
  • Effective ECMO support system not established

  • Known comorbidities that preclude effective resuscitation (e.g., pulmonary hypertension, systemic in-house outflow tract obstruction, semilunar or AV valve insufficiency, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cavopulmonary connection)

  • Circuit not immediately available

  • Equipment and personnel not trained for CPR

AV, Atrioventricular; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; ICU, intensive care unit; OR, operating room.

Historically, successes using ECMO during active resuscitation and chest compressions (E-CPR) have been reported for a small number of series. A recent subanalysis of the ELSO Registry E-CPR data reports a 37% overall survival to discharge for patients placed on ECMO in this circumstance. To avoid significant delays, a rapid response ECMO system has been established at some institutions. The success of a rapid response system depends on a multidisciplinary approach, with equipment being immediately available, and the personnel with assigned roles being in-house, including cardiac surgery and intensive care fellows, respiratory and ECMO specialists, and trained nursing staff. At Boston Children's Hospital, a vacuum and CO 2 -primed circuit using a roller pump and a 0.8- to 1.5-m 2 membrane oxygenator is available at all times and is suitable for children weighing up to approximately 15 kg. Even in older children, this circuit initially provides sufficient flow for resuscitation, stabilization, and hopefully prevention of end-organ damage, until a larger oxygenator can be spliced into the circuit. Generally, however, for older children and adults, a new circuit with a hollow-fiber membrane is used, which takes little time to de-air and can be established within 15 minutes. Once the patient is in stable condition with ECMO, the hollow-fiber membrane can be exchanged for a conventional membrane for longer-term support as necessary. An alternative rapid response system has been described, which uses a heparin-coated circuit, centrifugal pump, and a hollow-fiber membrane with a priming volume of only 250 mL and a priming time of only 5 minutes.

In postoperative cardiac patients, atrial and aortic cannulation via a reopened sternotomy is usually the access mode of choice. In other patients, experienced practitioners can rapidly gain access via the neck vessels. During resuscitation, the circuit is primed with crystalloid supplemented with 5% albumin. We do not wait for donor blood to be crossmatched to complete a blood prime of the circuit because of the inevitable delay. We prefer to reestablish organ perfusion as soon as possible, and once ECMO is satisfactorily established, blood products can be added or the priming crystalloid can be removed via hemofiltration. To assist with neurologic protection, where possible we maintain mild hypothermia (34° to 35° C) for the first 12 hours after administering ECMO during active resuscitation. Using the rapid response system, we can be ready to place a patient on ECMO within 15 minutes, and the main limitation is then the problems associated with cannulation. We have deployed the rapid response system during active resuscitation in more than 170 children since 1996, and we have been able to achieve a survival-to-discharge rate of 51% in this group of patients.

Technical Aspects of ECMO Cannulation

Cannulation for ECMO begins with preemptive maneuvers that will ensure expedient delivery of this lifesaving measure. Prior planning is key and can ensure smooth cannulation in a situation that may be chaotic. The first step is identifying patients in unstable condition and who may require institution of ECMO. If during the evaluation of the patient by the treating team in the ICU, a patient is believed to be at risk of hemodynamic or respiratory deterioration enough to require AV or VV ECMO, then it is important to communicate with the ECMO team. This communication includes the surgeon who will be performing the procedure and the ECMO specialists who will be priming and running the circuit. This will give them time to know patient details that will help to develop a cannulation and support strategy. Heparin can be drawn up and prepared. A range of cannulas can be preselected. An appropriately sized circuit can be prepared. The blood bank can be alerted. Identifying potential ECMO patients early can also allow for calm and sober discussion about the appropriateness of the intervention.

For the cannulating surgeon, intimate knowledge of the systemic venous and arterial anatomy, especially the patency of the peripheral vessels that may be considered for access, is vital. If peripheral cannulation is to be performed, it is appropriate to have confirmatory imaging obtained beforehand. In our cardiac ICU, we maintain a sheet of paper by the bedside detailing which peripheral arterial and venous access points are patent. This sheet can prevent unnecessary delays from cutting down on a vessel that is stenosed, scarred, or not patent. For patients with congenital cardiac anomalies, it is important to know in detail the topography of the heart, the intracardiac anatomy, and systemic venous arrangement. These details can have bearing on the cannulation strategy. For example, if a patient has a single left superior vena cava (SVC), venous access should be ideally obtained in the left neck. A patient with unoperated hypoplastic left heart syndrome may occasionally need to be cannulated centrally in the duct or main pulmonary artery for arterial inflow.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here