Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The liver has an amazing regenerative capacity, which can especially be observed in response to toxic injury and infection. However, in patients with certain hepatic conditions such as cirrhosis, steatosis, and conditions due to age—where liver matrix and cells are compromised—liver regeneration is impaired. In these conditions, where the architecture of the organ is altered, it is still unclear which cellular and molecular pathways prevent regeneration. However, fortunately, in these cases where endogenous regeneration is not possible, new alternatives are being investigated.
Cell therapy for repair of cirrhotic and steatotic livers is a new paradigm being evaluated worldwide. The most prevalent cells being used are self-derived bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (i.e., bone marrow stromal cells), although umbilical cord blood cell studies are also occurring. As the development of new stem cell sources continues to rapidly expand, it is expected that new liver cell sources will emerge.
Beyond cell therapy are surgical options for repair and regeneration. Full-liver transplant is a last-resort treatment measure, and orthotopic transplantation is the definitive treatment for end-stage organ failure. Criteria for a liver transplant include severe liver damage from alcoholism, chronic hepatitis, and cancer. In 2010, 101,000 people had hospital discharges with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis as the first-listed diagnosis. In the same year 31,903 people died from the same diagnostic causes.
In part because the need is so great and because liver is a regenerative organ, more recently, partial livers (from live donors) have been used for surgical transplantation. This is advantageous not only because it increases the number of donors, but because in recipients improvements in liver function and size occur rapidly. Although partial transplants and cell therapy are promising, they still have not met the need for organ transplant. Since 2009 the number of donors has been stable, despite the increasing need for organs ( Table 104-1 ). As of March 2014 there were 15,275 adults and 484 children on the liver transplant waiting list in the United States ( Table 104-2 ).
Type of Donor | To Date | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All donor types | 137,877 | 7,025 | 6,876 | 6,931 | 6,893 | 6,958 | 7,000 | 7,202 | 7,302 | 7,015 | 6,642 | 6,004 |
Deceased donor | 132,845 | 6,773 | 6,630 | 6,684 | 6,611 | 6,739 | 6,751 | 6,936 | 7,014 | 6,692 | 6,319 | 5,682 |
Living donor | 5,032 | 252 | 246 | 247 | 282 | 219 | 249 | 266 | 288 | 323 | 323 | 322 |
All Ages | Pediatric | Adult | |
---|---|---|---|
To date | 198,647 | 16,048 | 182,599 |
2013 | 12,020 | 744 | 11,276 |
2012 | 11,609 | 686 | 10,923 |
2011 | 11,922 | 716 | 11,206 |
2010 | 12,007 | 783 | 11,224 |
2009 | 11,255 | 784 | 10,471 |
2008 | 11,175 | 831 | 10,344 |
2007 | 11,081 | 822 | 10,259 |
2006 | 11,036 | 850 | 10,186 |
2005 | 10,986 | 876 | 10,110 |
2004 | 10,640 | 800 | 9,840 |
2003 | 10,046 | 821 | 9,225 |
2002 | 9,326 | 808 | 8,518 |
2001 | 10,741 | 982 | 9,759 |
2000 | 10,749 | 1,008 | 9,741 |
1999 | 10,518 | 950 | 9,568 |
1998 | 9,531 | 966 | 8,565 |
1997 | 8,619 | 941 | 7,678 |
1996 | 8,055 | 859 | 7,196 |
1995 | 7,331 | 821 | 6,510 |
Over the past decade the liver transplant life expectancy increased dramatically, primarily because of advancements in technology and experience of the transplant teams. There were 7030 donors in 2013, and 6455 liver transplants were performed with a good survival rate. However, the overall shortage of available donor livers leads to long waiting times, ultimately leading to death before transplantation. There is no doubt the shortage of organs for transplantation remains a significant unmet need.
Not only is liver tissue engineering being developed as a means of increasing the number of donor organs, it is a needed option to reduce the cost of bringing drugs to market. Even though in vitro models have facilitated more efficient drug screening, leading to accelerated preclinical studies in the drug development process, there is still a need for tissue-engineered liver models to recapitulate the in vivo microenvironment. Liver tissue engineering devices are being developed with applications that range from creation and use of extracorporeal biological devices that could potentially bridge patients in liver failure to transplantation, to improving drug-screening platforms for expediting drug development, studying liver organogenesis and liver disease, and finally to restoring lost liver function in vivo through cell, extrahepatic liver organoid, or whole-liver transplantation. This chapter describes new cell therapy and tissue-engineering options being developed for liver repair and regeneration.
A major revolution in liver repair in the last decade has been the introduction of therapy primarily with adult stem cells. A stem cell is simply a cell that can self-renew and differentiate into multiple cell types. Adult stem or progenitor cells are derived from any tissue after birth and are often harvested from bone marrow, blood, and even umbilical cord. These cells are stem cells in that they can proliferate and differentiate, but they are not “pluripotent” cells in that they are restricted in their proliferation and differentiation potential.
To date in cell therapy for liver repair, bone marrow has primarily been used as a source of stromal cells, also known as mesenchymal stem cells. Stromal cells are mesodermal in origin and can give rise to most mesodermal phenotypes, including bone, muscle, vascular endothelial precursors, mature endothelial cells, or smooth muscle cells, the latter three of which are critical for rebuilding vessel structures. In the past, stromal cells came from biopsies that included peripheral blood, bone marrow, and adipose tissue. More recently bone marrow and blood have also been used to derive “inducible pluripotent stem cells” (iPS cells)—adult stem cells that have essentially been moved “backward” in their differentiation state to a more primitive embryonic stem cell–like state. These iPS cells can give rise to virtually any cell type, thereby providing ever-expanding sources for both vascular and parenchymal liver progenitors.
The idea of using adult stem cells for liver repair is no longer new.
In fact, both allogeneic umbilical cord blood—derived and autologous bone marrow–derived mesenchymal cells are in clinical study, primarily in Asia and the Middle East. At present, www.clinicaltrials.gov shows approximately 100 studies actively recruiting patients ( Table 104-3 ) for cell therapy for cirrhosis, liver cancer, or acute liver failure. Many of the studies are investigator-initiated, but several are commercially sponsored; details for registered studies worldwide can be found at: www.clinical trials.gov .
Total Trials | Recruiting | Autologous Trials | Allogeneic Trials | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stem cells and liver | 215 | 90 | 36 | 52 |
Embryonic stem cells and liver | 3 | 0 | ||
iPS | 35 | 14 | 1 | 5 |
iPS and liver | 1 | 0 |
Although umbilical cord blood–derived and bone marrow–derived mesenchymal cells are the most prevalent cell sources currently being investigated, with new sources of cells being developed from autologous sources (e.g., iPS cells), it is likely the number of studies and the cell sources will increase rapidly over the next few years.
Developed in the past decades to either bridge patients to transplantation or allow the native liver to recover from failure, extracorporeal liver support devices can be of two types: artificial and bioartificial livers. Although the artificial livers are based on physical/chemical gradients and adsorption, the bioartificial or biohybrid systems incorporate a cell-housing bioreactor.
In the clinical setting the artificial systems can only support two of the three main liver functions: detoxification and regulation. Synthesis and homeostasis can certainly only be achieved by the biological systems.
The current artificial extracorporeal liver devices most used in the clinical setting are the MARS system and Prometheus fractionated plasma separation and absorption system. In acute liver failure these systems have been largely used to target albumin, the predominant carrier of lipophilic toxins such as bilirubin, bile acids, aromatic amino acids, and medium-chain fatty acids, which addresses one of the main disadvantages of the conventional extracorporeal procedures—a failure to eliminate large or protein-bound molecules. Several multicenter studies have been conducted with these devices but to date have not identified a patient group most likely to benefit from them.
A second artificial liver source is the bioartificial liver that utilizes capillary hollow fiber mechanisms, involving the culture of hepatocytes within a rigid housing. These capillary devices provide a large surface area for mass transfer, thereby amplifying the contact of hepatocytes with the patient's blood or plasma. The problems with these hybrid systems are maintaining cell viability and function at the required high density within the cell system, finding the optimal membrane type and structural arrangement, quantifying the volume of liver tissue present and functioning to support the patient, and defining the type of hepatocyte to be used. Although human hepatocytes are preferable, these cells fail to maintain their metabolic function and viability in cell culture unless transformed cell lines are used, which in turn raises a separate concern with regard to potential tumorigenicity. Alternatively, xenogeneic (porcine) cells have been used, but a major obstacle for the use of xenogeneic cells is the potential transmission of porcine endogenous retroviruses to the human bloodstream. New systems have been designed by using semipermeable membranes that would inhibit the transfer of viruses while still allowing free movement of albumin and hepatocyte growth factors. As a result, some bioartificial liver systems have been used clinically and may ultimately demonstrate safety and improvement in survival. The newer devices suggest an improvement in encephalopathy, but no real improvement has been shown in overall survival.
In 2013 in Nature , Takebe et al showed in preclinical rodent studies that human iPS cell–derived liver organoids could be built from human iPS cell–derived hepatocytes combined with endothelial and stromal cells and that these organoids could survive and function extrahepatically in mice. Although this is not a clinical study, it suggests that tissue engineering or cell therapy may ultimately provide new alternatives for liver repair.
In the past decade a promising tissue-engineering/regenerative-medicine approach for functional organ replacement has emerged that is based on the decellularization of donor organs such as liver and kidney to provide an acellular three-dimensional (3-D) biological scaffold material with vascular conduits that can then be reseeded with selected stem or progenitor cell populations. Preliminary studies in animal models have provided encouraging results that this technology can provide functional new organs. However, significant challenges remain for this approach, including the need for finding appropriate cell types, ways to reseed scaffolds, and methods for “growing” these nascent tissues in a sterile laboratory environment.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here