Role of radiology in initial trauma evaluation


Radiology testing in the trauma setting including radiography, fluoroscopy, ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has increased substantially in the emergency room and trauma setting over the last decade. The use of CT, which is most concerning because of expense and radiation dose, increased 330% from 1996 to 2007 such that almost one quarter of all CT scans are performed in the emergency department. The increase in total number of patients seeking emergency room care during that period only increased by 30%. Substantial costs to the health care system and patient safety issues derive from overutilization of imaging resources. Safety concerns include the theoretical risk of cancer in patients exposed to radiation, the risk for renal failure or allergic reactions from contrast media, and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis from MRI contrast agents. While these risks are often outweighed by the benefits of diagnosis, radiologists from all across the country report an excessive number of negative examinations performed for questionable indications. While medical-legal issues are often cited as a reason for imaging, the not-too-distant future may herald litigation for physicians who overorder radiation-based tests. Despite these concerns, imaging will remain an important tool in the diagnostic armamentarium of trauma physicians. Determining the best study to order for a particular indication requires an understanding of each modality’s uses and risks as well as an understanding of how pretest probability and evidence influence diagnostic decision making.

Radiography

Plain radiography (plain films or “x-rays”) uses ionizing radiation (potentially a cause of cancer) to produce an image based on the relative densities of tissues. Metal appears most white and air appears black with all other tissues filling in the range of appearances. The spatial resolution of plain radiographs is excellent and with portable units, images are acquired with minimal patient transfer. Before CT came into common use, radiographs were the most reliable assessment for musculoskeletal injuries and evaluation of the chest. It is still commonly used in the trauma setting for a rapid evaluation of the chest, pelvis, and extremities.

The initial radiograph of the chest and pelvis is useful as a quick screening tool to assess extent of traumatic injuries, though sensitivity to detect soft tissue and bony injuries should be considered low or moderate at best if patient position is not optimal. Sensitivity also depends partly on radiograph quality ( Fig. 1 ). Overlying structures such as backboards and electrocardiogram leads limit assessment of soft tissues and obscure the lung apices where small pneumothoraces may reside. Because lung volumes are typically low, the heart and mediastinum normally appear wide or enlarged. Subtle findings that suggest aortic injury such as thickening or obscuration of the paraspinal stripe is difficult to appreciate. Retrocardiac density may obscure the descending aorta and left diaphragm due to atelectasis common to the supine patient in expiratory phase of respiration. Anterolateral rib fractures in particular may be missed. The pelvis radiograph may also miss subtle injuries, and evidence of pelvic trauma through physical examination is key to interpreting these films with respect to pretest probabilities ( Fig. 2 ).

FIGURE 1, Typical chest radiograph in a trauma patient illustrates features that limit sensitivity in evaluating the chest. The chest in this patient was normal other than an old clavicle fracture. The lung volumes are low, which makes the lung appear hazy. This could be taken as a false-positive for contusion. The backboard and overlying wires obscure parts of the bones and the chest, altering normal densities. Because of the supine position and low volumes, the heart and mediastinum appear wide, which is normal for this kind of study but could result in a missed mediastinum injury.

FIGURE 2, Radiographs of a normal (A) and a fractured (B) pelvis in two different patients. In both radiographs the backboard interferes with image quality, decreasing sensitivity for fracture. (A) A dark line along the left iliac bone is an artifact. Physicians should be cautious when reading these limited examinations. At minimum, the following lines should be glanced at to ensure they are smooth and regular: iliopectineal line (orange) reflecting the anterior column, sacroiliac joint (blue) , obturator ring (pink) assesses the pubic rami, teardrop (green) reflects the medial acetabular wall and the acetabular notch and anterior portion of the quadrilateral plate, and the posterior rim of the acetabulum (yellow) . (B) Fractures of the right femoral neck, right inferior pubic ramus, left superior, inferior rami, and the left pubic bone. The sacroiliac joint on the left side is slightly widened.

Fluoroscopy uses x-rays in a similar fashion as plain radiographs, but the images are viewed in real time, typically with the introduction of contrast agents. The radiation dose administered during a burst of fluoro is typically less than for a conventional radiograph; however, since multiple bursts of fluoro are given during a typical procedure, the radiation dose can increase rapidly. Diagnostic fluoroscopic procedures are useful for evaluating hollow viscus or any structure into which contrast can be placed. The image is then a lumenogram, useful for identifying leaks in the bowel ( Fig. 3 ), bladder, or extravasation during angiograms. Fluoroscopy is often used by orthopedic surgeons to set bones. Operators who use fluoroscopy should wear leaded gowns, thyroid shields, and radiation badges when appropriate.

FIGURE 3, Esophagogram during (A) and immediately after (B ) swallowing gastrografin. (A) The column of contrast material is seen in the esophagus (arrow) and a small outpouching of contrast material begins to form (arrowhead) . The contrast material persists after the esophagus is cleared (B) , indicating that it has leaked. In the setting of a gunshot wound as illustrated by the metallic shrapnel, this is most likely posttraumatic.

Ultrasound

US uses a transducer to generate sound waves, which pass into the body and bounce off tissues that have features that reflect sound. The reflected sound returns to and is detected by the transducer. By knowing how much sound returned to the transducer and how long it took for the sound wave to make the round trip, the computer calculates the depth and relative brightness of the tissue. Therefore, the image is not a density map; rather, the image is based on the ability of various tissues to reflect sound. For this reason, something that is bright is called echogenic or hyperechoic (many echoes) and something that is darker than surrounding tissues is hypoechoic (less echoes) or completely black is anechoic (no echoes). Because water conducts sound, it appears black since no sound waves are reflected. In contrast, air is a strong reflector of sound so most of the sound is reflected to the transducer. Therefore, air appears as a white line with “dirty shadowing” or an indistinct fuzzy appearance beneath it that obscures features of tissues deeper than the air. Radiology technologists sometimes say that a structure like the pancreas is “gassed out,” meaning that gas from bowel is obscuring that structure. If gas is a problem, you can give ask the patient to drink water, which fills the stomach and duodenum and allows better images of structures in the upper abdomen. When structures are obscured by gas or bone, it is said that the patient has “poor windows” and giving water can improve those “windows” ( Fig. 4 ).

FIGURE 4, (A) Ultrasound image of the right upper quadrant shows the liver (LIV) and an area of white hazy shadowing (arrow) . This is the dirty shadowing created by air within the bowel at the uppermost aspect of the abdomen just beneath the striated muscle (m) . (B) Longitudinal views of the liver (LIV) and right kidney (RT KID) show a small subhepatic anechoic area. To ensure this is not a vascular structure, color Doppler was placed on the area. (C) Because it showed no flow, it is confirmed as a small amount of free fluid. Although more obvious cases could have been provided, it is important to realize that small areas of fluid could herald a more significant injury, and trauma surgeons performing a focused assessment with sonography in trauma should be on the lookout for small areas of free fluid.

US has excellent temporal resolution and allows real-time imaging of the body. It is particularly useful for detecting fluid and the characteristics of fluid such as hemoperitoneum in the trauma setting. It is also useful for detecting injuries to solid organs and confirming the patency of vasculature using Doppler techniques. Importantly, since US uses sound waves, there is no ionizing radiation. Because US contrast agents are not typically used in the trauma setting, there is no risk of contrast or allergic reactions, so the safety profile of US is excellent. However, the sensitivity to detect disease such as solid organ injuries is lower than other modalities such as CT.

Computed tomography

CT has become the workhorse in the trauma setting due to improved availability and the brief time it takes to acquire images. CT does use x-rays, a potentially cancer-causing form of ionizing radiation. By measuring the attenuation of x-rays of a particular spot in the body using a variety of projections, a computer assigns a value to that area based off the Hounsfield scale where water is assigned a value of 0 and air is assigned −1000. All other densities are then assigned Hounsfield units reflecting their relative density ( Fig. 5 ). CT has excellent spatial resolution and good contrast resolution. Spatial resolution for CT is the ability to differentiate two lines separated by a very small distance. Spatial resolution allows a viewer to see small structures. Contrast resolution for CT is the ability to differentiate two adjacent tissues of slightly varying density. The ability to see a liver contusion is very dependent on contrast resolution and image noise. A noisy image appears grainy to the viewer and can obscure findings by decreasing contrast resolution. Generally, the more radiation dose used, the less noise and better overall image quality will result. Another way to improve contrast resolution is to use intravenous (IV) CT contrast. IV contrast agents for CT are made up of iodinated molecules that attenuate x-rays and appear bright on the image.

FIGURE 5, Coronal view of the abdomen and pelvis shows different Hounsfield units (HU) of the circled tissue. Notice that the mean HU value is calculated based on all the pixels in the circled area and as such, the minimum, maximum, and standard deviation are calculated. Mean HU values in this patient are as follows: lung −706, liver 51.6, enhanced aorta 284, aortic thrombus 26.6, fat −104, cortical bone 843, and urine 1.42.

IV contrast reflects the vascularity of a tissue or pathologies within the tissue, and the timing of the contrast bolus is important as the different phase of contrast impacts what can be seen in the image. This is important to understand because it explains why radiologists have to scan the patient multiple times and why it’s important to let the radiologist know exactly what is being looked for before the study is performed. The arterial phase is obtained between 15 and 30 seconds after injection of contrast depending on what part of the body is being scanned and how fast the CT scanner is. A CT obtained in the arterial phase is called a CT angiogram or CTA. The arterial phase only shows arterial supply and is excellent for seeing extraluminal contrast (active extravasation) against the background of unenhanced tissue ( Fig. 6 ). Unfortunately, it is sometimes difficult to decide if a particular line of contrast seen on the image is part of a small vessel or actually a spurt of extravasated contrast. For this, a more delayed phase of contrast is required. Splenic parenchyma is also particularly difficult in the arterial phase as the heterogeneous blood supply causes a mixed pattern that can be mistaken for a splenic injury.

FIGURE 6, Active extravasation and computed tomography (CT) phases. Multiple axial CT images of the abdomen were obtained in this patient with trauma to the left abdomen in arterial (A), portal venous (B), and 5-minute delayed (C) phases. The aorta clues the reader to the phase as it is brightest in arterial, less bright in portal venous, and darkest in the delayed phases. A grade IV splenic laceration is seen in all images. A wisp of contrast material on the arterial phase (A) marked by the arrow shows what could be either extravasated contrast agent or something dense like a calcification. On the portal venous phase (B) it changes shape, indicating the finding is extravasating contrast agent. On the delay phase, the contrast agent is spread out in a blush and is denser than surrounding fluid but similar to vascular structures. This confirms active extravasation.

The “portal venous” phase is usually acquired between 60 and 75 seconds after injection of contrast. During this time, the portal veins and solid organs including the liver, kidneys, pancreas, and spleen should be optimally enhanced for evaluation of the parenchyma. It is ideal for detecting subtle contusions or lacerations. The arteries remain enhanced but because the parenchyma of solid organs is enhanced, extravasation may be difficult to evaluate. Large veins are also enhanced at this phase, and venous injuries may be detected. The delayed phase is acquired 5 minutes after contrast injection and is best for evaluating the renal collecting system and urinary bladder as they should be filled with contrast. Solid organs have lost most of their parenchymal enhancement by 5 minutes. Because arteries are certainly not enhanced during the delayed examination, extravasated contrast will appear as a larger, more diffuse area of contrast enhancement (a blush) than the focus of extravasated contrast seen on the arterial phase. By comparing the delayed phase or sometimes even the portal venous phase to the arterial phase, active extravasation can be diagnosed. The downside of obtaining multiple phases of contrast is the doubling or tripling of radiation dose. To reduce the chances of obtaining unnecessary scans, the radiologist may view the images before the delay phase and decide whether or not additional phases are necessary.

CT technology has dramatically changed over the past 15 years. Conventional CT scanners obtained one image (a slice) of a given thickness. After acquiring the image, the table moved the patient to the next position and another image was obtained. This is called step and shoot. For various reasons, reconstructed images were limited, and the scans were relatively slow. With helical or spiral CT, the table moves at a constant rate throughout image acquisition as the gantry rotates around the patient. Software reconstructs the images into a volumetric data set that can be reconstructed in any plane. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) uses multiple rows of detectors to scan a wider area of the body with each rotation. Since the scan covers a greater area, the table speed can be increased and the total time decreases. This is particularly helpful in the trauma setting as patients with altered mental status may not hold still and motion degrades image quality, making diagnosis difficult. Some of the newest and fastest units have acquired diagnostic images while a child tried to sit up on the CT table during the scan. All new CT units are MDCT and detector rows of 64, 128, and 320 have revolutionized CT imaging.

CT image processing

With the advent of spiral CT and isotropic data sets (each voxel or part of the image makes up a cube of equal sides), the image can be reconstructed into any plane. By changing the color or brightness that a particular density is assigned, a variety of images can be generated. Three-dimensional images are produced by assigning colors to various densities in the volume data set ( Fig. 7 ). Maximum intensity projected images emphasize high-density structures such as contrast-enhanced vessels and bone. Lower-density structures are suppressed. Maximum intensity projected images are very useful for assessing arteries in the trauma patient. These image processing techniques help show spatial relationships between injuries, anatomy, and foreign bodies ( Fig. 8 ).

FIGURE 7, Three-dimensional reconstructed images of the skull status post-gunshot wound to the head and face aid in surgical planning. Images demonstrate highly comminuted depressed frontal and parietal skull fractures as well as comminuted fractures of the mandibular angle and ramus.

FIGURE 8, Multidetector computed tomography. Coronal images of a trauma patient with a liver laceration after a gunshot wound with diaphragm injury. These images were acquired in the standard axial plane, but because they are isotropic, they were reconstructed into the coronal plane. The multiplanar reformat (MPR) is the typical computed tomography image with a 1.5-mm slice thickness with gray scale displayed on soft tissue windows. The laceration at the liver dome and fluid inferior to the liver border is easily visible. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) image in this example has slice thickness of 90 mm of tissue and displays higher-density structures like bone, contrast-enhanced vessels, and the kidneys as brighter than lower-density structures. By assigning color instead of gray scale to 90-mm thickness of tissue (3D1) or looking at the entire full thickness of tissue (3D2), the three-dimensional volume rendered display can be created. In 3D2, soft tissue was assigned no color; therefore, those structures are not included on the image.

Magnetic resonance imaging

MRI has limited use in the early trauma setting because it is generally not available in most trauma centers, it takes a relatively long time to acquire the images, and the patient must be free of metallic foreign bodies. MRI has excellent contrast resolution, but spatial resolution of CT is superior. CT is able to make most of the diagnoses important to stabilize the patient. Detailed evaluation of the spinal cord or evaluation of subtle diffuse axonal injury lesions may be improved with MRI.

Management of iodine allergies

If the patient has a known severe iodinated contrast allergy, then CT may be performed without the administration of IV contrast, although it will be significantly limited in evaluation for vascular, solid organ, and hollow viscus injury. Another option would be to premedicate the patient with corticosteroids and diphenhydramine; however, the fastest widely accepted protocol requires a 6-hour preparation time. IV contrast administration after premedication should only be performed in patients who report prior minor reactions to IV contrast, history of moderate to severe asthma, severe reaction to one substance, or multiple known food, medication, or other substance allergies. Contrary to prior beliefs, studies have shown that a history of minor shellfish allergy does not pose a significant risk of reaction to contrast administration. Premedication should not be administered if there is a history of anaphylaxis or bronchospasm after IV contrast exposure. Caution should also be taken in administering contrast despite premedication in patients on chronic corticosteroid therapy, those having severe allergic reaction to any one substance, and those with severe allergies. Keep in mind that even with premedication a patient may still adversely react to IV contrast. No set premedication protocol exists. Tables 1 and 2 list widely accepted premedication protocols.

TABLE 1
Standard Premedication Protocol
Prednisone 50 mg PO Administer 13, 7, and 1 hour prior to IV contrast administration
or Administer 12 and 2 hours prior to IV contrast administration
Methylprednisolone 32 mg PO Administer 13, 7, and 1 hour before IV contrast administration
or
Hydrocortisone 200 mg IV
Diphenhydramine 50 mg PO, IV, or IM Administer 1 hour prior to IV contrast administration

TABLE 2
Urgent Premedication Protocol
Hydrocortisone 200 mg IV Administer 6 hours prior to IV contrast administration
Diphenhydramine 50 mg IV Administer 1 hour prior to contrast administration

Skull and brain

Traumatic brain injuries lead to significant morbidity and mortality in trauma patients. Evaluation with a noncontrast CT of the brain is routine and should be the first step to exclude traumatic brain injury. Candidates for imaging include those who suffer loss of consciousness or altered mental status; those with neurological deficits; intoxicated patients; patients with battle signs, fluid or bloody otorrhea, suspected CSF leaks, and facial trauma ( Figs. 9 and 10 ).

FIGURE 9, Anteroposterior skull radiograph (A) demonstrates a stab wound through the head with embedded knife. Noncontrast CT bone windows (B) demonstrate the intracranial course of the knife through the left temporal lobe and into the left cavernous sinus. (C) Right frontal bone fracture (arrow) results in bifrontal pneumocephalus (star). The pneumocephalus elicits mass effect on the frontal lobes.

FIGURE 10, (A, B) Noncontrast axial and coronal multiplanar reformat CT images of the brain status post-gunshot wound to the head. The bullet trajectory is delineated by intra- and extra-axial hemorrhage, bone fragments, and bullet shrapnel. There are comminuted fractures of both temporal bones, pneumocephalus, parenchymal lacerations, and parenchymal, intraventricular, subarachnoid, and subdural/epidural hemorrhages.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage will appear as extra-axial serpiginous areas of high density, high density within the interpeduncular cistern, focal high-density collections in sulci and cerebellar folia, high density along the interhemispheric fissure or along the tentorium ( Fig. 11 ). Acute subdural hemorrhage usually appears as dense extra-axial crescent-shaped collections; however, they may also present as dense thickening of the interhemispheric fissure or blood layering along the tentorium. Acute epidural bleeds present as lentiform or convex-shaped extra-axial dense collections and commonly have an adjacent skull fracture. Hemorrhagic cortical contusions appear as high-density foci within the cerebral cortex. Diffuse axonal injuries, injury to the white matter tracts, are difficult to diagnose. MRI is more sensitive than CT in identifying these lesions and therefore the preferred imaging choice to identify these lesions. MRI gradient echo sequences and diffusion tensor imaging are the best sequences to identify these lesions. On MRI 1- to 15-mm foci of edema or hemorrhage may be seen in the white matter tracts. Diffuse axonal injuries may present on CT as foci of hemorrhage (high density) at the gray-white matter junction and within the corpus callosum, thalami, cerebral peduncles, and basal ganglia. Diffuse axonal injuries are a leading cause of persistent unconsciousness and vegetative states as well as persistent neurological impairment in the trauma patient. In a patient with persistent coma and negative CT, MRI should be obtained to evaluate for diffuse axonal injuries.

FIGURE 11, (A) Noncontrast computed tomography (CT) of the brain demonstrates subarachnoid hemorrhage in the left sylvian fissure and temporal lobe (arrow) . (B) CT angiogram of the brain in the same patient. Note how contrast agent can obscure the subarachnoid hemorrhage. (C) Noncontrast CT of the brain demonstrates subarachnoid hemorrhage (arrows) in the sylvian fissures, basal cisterns, and intraventricular hemorrhage within the left lateral and third ventricles (star) . (D) Coronal multiplanar reformat noncontrast CT of the brain demonstrates subdural hemorrhage along the left tentorial leaflet (arrow). (E) Axial noncontrast CT of the brain demonstrates subarachnoid hemorrhage in the basal, interpeduncular, sylvian, and suprasellar cisterns. (F) Axial noncontrast CT of the brain demonstrates right frontal hemorrhagic contusion, diffuse subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hemorrhage along the interhemispheric fissure, septum pellucidum hemorrhage, and left lateral and third intraventricular hemorrhage.

Both penetrating injuries and blunt trauma to the head and neck may result in vascular injury. CTA (computed tomography arteriography) of the head and neck should be performed if there is concern for vascular occlusion, dissection, transection, vascular extravasation, or carotid cavernous sinus fistula ( Fig. 12 ). CTA should be performed following a noncontrast brain CT as contrast typically obscures hemorrhage (see Fig. 11 B). Incidentally CTA images of the head and neck may demonstrate brain death. In brain death there is nonopacification of the arteries above the level of the terminal internal carotid arteries. The most sensitive and specific marker of brain death on CTA is nonopacification of the cortical middle cerebral arteries and internal cerebral veins ( Fig. 13 ). Confirmation may be obtained with a dedicated nuclear medicine brain perfusion study.

FIGURE 12, Computed tomography angiogram of coronal reconstructed image of the internal carotid artery demonstrating an intimal flap (arrow) .

FIGURE 13, (A) Noncontrast axial CT of the brain demonstrates normal sulcal pattern and preserved gray-white matter differentiation. (B) Noncontrast axial CT of the brain in brain death demonstrates diffuse sulcal effacement and loss of gray-white matter differentiation. (C) Computed tomography angiography (CTA) maximum intensity projected (MIP) images of the head and neck demonstrate normal opacification of the cervical and intracranial carotid vasculature. (D) CTA MIP images of the head and neck in brain death demonstrate loss of opacification of the high cervical and intracranial carotid vasculature. (E) Brain death. Three-dimensional MIP images demonstrate loss of opacification of the high cervical and intracranial segments of the carotid vasculature.

If the patient exhibits signs of skull base injury, then a dedicated temporal bone CT should be performed. Axial 1- to 2-mm thin section CT images are obtained through the temporal bones. Sagittal and coronal images should be reformatted to aid in the detection of subtle nondisplaced fractures and to evaluate the extent and path of injury.

Spine

Traditionally x-rays of the spine were used to evaluate for fractures and ligamentous injuries. With the advent of CT their use has diminished as the limitations of conventional radiography are better recognized. CT is not only faster but has been proven to be more accurate in the evaluation of spine injuries. The spine is now routinely incorporated in whole body CT protocols. Sagittal and coronal reformatted images aid in the evaluation of spine injuries ( Fig. 14 ). MRI remains the best modality to evaluate for ligamentous injury, spinal cord injury, and epidural hematomas.

FIGURE 14, (A) Computed tomography angiogram, sagittal reconstructed image, and (B) axial image of the lumbar spine. Note L5 burst fracture with bony retropulsion into the spinal canal.

Face

Any patient with signs of facial trauma, abrasions, swelling, gross deformities, and lacerations should undergo facial CT. Coronal and sagittal reconstructed images of the face aid in the diagnosis of subtle and nondisplaced fractures. Three-dimensional images have also been proven to be useful for surgical planning. Facial CT can identify injuries to the globe, retrobulbar hematomas, extraconal hematomas, muscular entrapment, and presence of foreign bodies ( Fig. 15 ).

FIGURE 15, (A) Noncontrast axial CT of the face demonstrates fractures of the maxillary sinus walls (block arrows) , maxilla/hard palate (star) , and left lateral pterygoid plate (thin arrow) . Opacified maxillary sinuses consistent with hemosinus. (B) Noncontrast CT of the orbits demonstrates left preseptal/periorbital soft tissue swelling/hematoma (arrow) , depressed lamina papyracea fracture, and retrobulbar hematoma (star) .

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here