Regional anesthesia


Introduction

Proper pain management is an important aspect of perioperative pediatric anesthesia care and is also a significant contributor to patient/parent satisfaction ( ; ; ; ; Walkeret al. 2015). Commonly used regional anesthetic techniques are an essential component in pediatric pain management. These regional anesthesia techniques, which include spinal, neuraxial, and ultrasound-guided paravertebral and peripheral nerve blocks, not only provide patient analgesia but also increase the anesthetic margin of safety and limit the undesirable side effects of opioid pain medications. This chapter will focus on regional anesthesia from the perspectives of safety, anatomy, and medications. Techniques and principles involving nerve stimulation and ultrasound guidance as well as individual nerve blocks will also be addressed.

Safety

Although a number of studies have been published on the complications associated with both neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks in children, most regional anesthesia studies report significant complication rates less than 1 in 1000 ( ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ). Though these rates are low, there are still case reports of devastating neurologic injuries in children after epidural analgesia ( ). In an audit of over 10,000 patients, Llewellyn and Moriarty reported serious injury in 1:2000 and a serious injury lasting greater than 12 months in 1:10,000 ( ). Severe systemic complications such as local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), cardiac arrest, and respiratory arrest were each less than 1:10,000 ( ; ; ; ). In a retrospective review of 24,005 regional anesthetics administered over a 10-year period, Flandin-Blety and Barrier reported 108 events without sequelae (0.45%) ( ). However, in this review, five events resulted in severe neurologic injury, including tetraplegia in three children, paraplegia in one child, and cerebral lesions in one child. In the Anesthetists Reanimateurs of Expression Francaise (ADARPEF) prospective report of 24,409 regional blocks performed in children over a 1-year period, Giaufré and colleagues reported that the overall complication rate of regional anesthesia was 0.9 per 1000 and that the highest rate of complications were in children younger than 6 months of age. Although central blocks accounted for greater than 60% of the blocks, and peripheral nerve blocks and local anesthetic techniques made up the remaining 38%, all of the reported complications occurred in children who had received central blocks. The two most common complications from regional blockade were inadvertent dural puncture and inadvertent intravascular injection of local anesthetic. There were no deaths secondary to any of the complications ( ).

In a follow-up, prospective study conducted 12 years later and of over 30,000 regional blocks, Ecoffey and associates reported an overall complication rate of 0.12% ( ). As with the ADARPEF study in 1996, infants younger than 6 months of age had a higher complication incidence (0.4%) compared with infants older than 6 months of age (0.1%). In addition, patients having central blocks had a sixfold greater complication rate than patients with peripheral blocks ( ).

The ASRA Practice Advisory reiterates the safety of regional techniques, citing a rate of 2 to 4 per 10,000 blocks as well as the safety of peripheral and neuraxial block placement in anesthetized children ( ). Additionally, Long and colleagues noted the low risk of neuraxial techniques in neonates for postoperative pain control ( ). The Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN Database) cites similar safety findings in a database with over 100,000 nerve blocks. There were no permanent neurologic deficits recorded, and the risk of transient neurologic injury was 2.4 per 10,000 ( ).

General anesthesia for block placement

One of the major differences in the practice of regional anesthesia in children is the common use of general anesthesia to facilitate block placement. Light sedation is commonly used in adults to facilitate block placement because it still allows patients to communicate dysesthesia during needle/catheter placement and thereby potentially warn the practitioner of impending nerve injury. However, light sedation for block placement is impractical in infants and younger children ( ; ; ). Light sedation in infants and small children does not prevent movement (and possible injury) during the placement of a regional block ( ). In addition to preventing movement, general anesthesia can also attenuate the anxiety and/or stress during block placement, which can increase patient/parent acceptance of the technique and thereby increase the number of patients who will potentially benefit from a regional technique ( ). General anesthesia for the placement of regional anesthesia has been shown to be safe. Horlocker and colleagues reported no permanent neurologic complications in epidural placement in 4298 fully anesthetized patients ( ). The safety of general anesthesia for pediatric block placement is further supported from publications involving the PRAN database ( ; ; ; ). Using the PRAN centralized database of 13,725 patients undergoing 14,917 regional blocks placed during a 3-year period, Polaner reported no deaths or complications that lasted greater than 3 months. Over 95% of the blocks were placed in anesthetized patients. In a separate PRAN study of 18,650 caudal blocks, noted a complication incidence (defined as block failure, blood aspiration, and intravascular injection) of 1.6%. No temporary or permanent sequelae were reported. Taenzer and colleagues noted that in pediatric patients having interscalene blocks placed under general anesthesia, the incidence of serious adverse events was similar to that of adults having interscalene blocks placed awake or under sedation ( ). The complications associated with both neuraxial and peripheral nerve block techniques are listed in Box 24.1 .

BOX 24.1
Complications Associated with Regional Anesthesia

Central neuraxial techniques

  • Residual neurologic deficit

  • Epidural abscess

  • Postdural puncture headache

  • Neuropathy/radiculopathy/paraplegia

  • Compressive hematoma

  • Air embolism (if air is used in loss-of-resistance technique)

  • Meningitis

Peripheral techniques

  • Neurologic deficits; dysesthesia

  • Wrong site

Both central and peripheral techniques

  • Medication errors

  • Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST)

  • Compartment syndrome with dense blockade

  • Infection

  • Catheter leakage; kinking; knotting; shearing; migration; accidental removal

Long-term catheters

When long-term pain relief is needed, a regional block with a catheter for continuous use can be employed. Though catheters can provide safe and adequate analgesia postoperatively, catheters can also increase the risk associated with regional anesthesia. These additional risk factors include intravascular and intraneural catheter placement, catheter shearing, knotting, kinking, and retention. Catheters are also subject to migration after placement, with consequent leakage, and infection ( ; ; ; ; ; ). Risk factors for infection include catheters that remain in situ for more than 3 days and patients with underlying cancer or immunodeficiency ( ). The most common infectious complications are cellulitis and localized abscess formation at the insertion site ( ). These complications generally resolve with removal of the catheter.

Maximum allowable doses

Paramount to the safety of any anesthetic technique is the knowledge of effective but safe drug dosage. The recommended maximum dosing for local anesthetics has been published in many textbooks and articles over the years. Adult dosage recommendations are mainly extrapolated from animal data, which are then retrofitted for use in pediatrics. In pediatrics, exact dosing of local anesthetics and adjuncts is challenging because of age-related changes in pharmacology (i.e., changes in body composition, protein binding, and organ function) and changes with site-specific differences in systemic absorption ( Boxes 24.2 and 24.3 ) ( ).

BOX 24.2
Factors Influencing Plasma Levels of Local Anesthetics

  • Amount injected

  • Absorption rate

  • Site of injection

  • Tissue redistribution rate

  • Biotransformation

  • Use of a vasoconstrictor

  • Excretion rate

  • Patient age; cardiovascular status; hepatic and renal function

BOX 24.3
Site Absorption of Local Anesthetics from Highest to Least

  • Intravenous

  • Tracheal

  • Intercostal

  • Caudal/epidural

  • Paracervical

  • Lumbar epidural

  • Brachial plexus

  • Sciatic

  • Subcutaneous

The caveat regarding local anesthetic dosing is that when local anesthetics are combined, their toxicities are additive. Therefore if the maximum allowable dosage of one local anesthetic has been reached, another local anesthetic agent should not be delivered ( ). For a bolus injection, the maximum recommended dosage of lidocaine is 5 mg/kg. Because epinephrine decreases uptake and absorption of local anesthetic, the dosage of lidocaine can be increased to 7 mg/kg when epinephrine (5 mcg/mL) is added to the local anesthetic. The maximum allowable bolus dosage for bupivacaine, ropivacaine, and levobupivacaine is 3 mg/kg; however, the addition of epinephrine does not change the maximum allowable dose ( ; ). Recommendations for maximum dosing of continuous infusions ( Table 24.1 ) are the same for bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine ( ). For epidural infusions, the infusion rates should not exceed 0.4 to 0.5 mg/kg per hour for patients older than 4 months of age, and the recommendation for neonates is not to exceed 0.2 to 0.25 mg/kg per hour. Based on the clearance of bupivacaine and using the guidelines in Table 24.1 , the plasma concentrations should remain below 2.5 mcg/mL and therefore below the toxic level of 4 mcg/mL ( ; ). These infusions assume a loading dosage of 2 to 2.5 mg/kg of bupivacaine and should be reduced by 25% in patients with risk factors for seizures (i.e., past history of febrile seizures, hypomagnesemia, and hyponatremia) ( ; ).

TABLE 24.1
Local Anesthetics: Guidelines for Maximum Allowable Dosage
Modified from Berde, C. B. (1992). Convulsions associated with pediatric regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg, 75, 164.
Local Anesthetic Single Dose Continuous Infusion Rate in Infants (>4 mo) Continuous Infusion Rate in Infants (<4 mo) *
Bupivacaine 3 mg/kg 0.4–0.5 mg/kg/hr 0.2–0.25 mg/kg/hr
Levobupivacaine 3 mg/kg 0.4–0.5 mg/kg/hr 0.2–0.25 mg/kg/hr
Ropivacaine 3 mg/kg 0.4–0.5 mg/kg/hr 0.2–0.25 mg/kg/hr
Lidocaine 5 mg/kg 1.6 mg/kg/hr 0.8 mg/kg/hr
Lidocaine with epinephrine 7 mg/kg NA NA
NA, Not applicable.

* For infants, rate should be reduced by an additional 30% after 48 hours.

Maximum allowable dosage may be up to 4 mg/kg (under investigation).

Epinephrine added to local anesthetic to achieve a concentration of 5 mcg/mL or 1:200,000.

After the local anesthetic is chosen, the concentration must also be considered. In general, lower concentrations of local anesthetics such as 0.25% bupivacaine or levobupivacaine and 0.2% ropivacaine may be used in infants and small children, and higher concentrations such as 0.5% bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, or ropivacaine should be reserved for older children. Higher concentrations result in longer duration of action and increased motor block, but the total milligram dosage must be calculated carefully.

Local anesthetic systemic toxicity

Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) can result in serious manifestations in the central nervous system and cardiovascular system. Proposed mechanisms of LAST involve the prevention of the fast inward sodium channels in the myocardium from opening and involvement of potassium channels ( ).

LAST is a rare event. Sites and colleagues reported on a clinical registry of 12,688 patients undergoing regional anesthesia and noted that the incidence (per 1000 blocks) of adverse events across all peripheral regional anesthetics was 1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 2.7) for postoperative neurologic symptoms lasting longer than 5 days, 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5 to 1.7) for postoperative neurologic symptoms lasting longer than 6 months, 0.08 (95% CI 0.0 to 0.3) for seizures, 0 (95% CI 0 to 0.3) for unintended venipuncture, 1.2 (95% CI, 0.7 to 2.0) for unintended arterial puncture, and 2.0 (95% CI, 1.2 to 3.0) for patients having unintended paresthesia during block placement. There were no cardiac arrests ( ).

CNS symptoms of LAST in nonsedated patients include headache, agitation, confusion, somnolence, coma, dizziness, tinnitus, and circumoral and lingual paresthesia. These symptoms, however, will be masked in the anesthetized patient. Signs of LAST in the anesthetized patient include hypoxemia, muscular rigidity, tachycardia or dysrhythmias (ventricular ectopy, multiform ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation), or complete cardiovascular collapse. Though general anesthetics are protective from the CNS effects, they may potentiate the cardiovascular manifestations ( ; ). In pregnant and nonpregnant ewes, Santos and DeArmas noted that the relative potencies of these local anesthetics were bupivacaine > levobupivacaine > ropivacaine ( ). However, in adult obstetric patients, ropivacaine was shown to be only 60% as potent as bupivacaine ( ), even though alpha-1-acid glycoprotein binding was the same ( ), and levobupivacaine and bupivacaine were equipotent ( ). For routine use in children, Lönnqvist proposed the use of ropivacaine or levobupivacaine over bupivacaine ( ). Regardless of local anesthetic used, strict adherence to the suggested maximum allowable dosing guidelines for each anesthetic is necessary, and avoiding conditions (hypoxemia, hypercarbia, tissue acidosis) that potentiate anesthetic toxicity is essential. In addition, the use of ultrasound can also reduce LAST by avoiding vascular structures and decreasing the required amount of local anesthetic. Appropriate techniques, such as aspiration for blood prior to injecting, as well as avoiding, rapid injections (which result in accelerated high peak) also decrease the likelihood of LAST. When two or more local anesthetics are used, it is necessary to calculate the maximum allowable dose of each and adjust the dosing based on the relative percentage of each used.

Test dose

Another factor to ensure patient safety is the use of test doses. A test dose is performed through the use of a marker medication that will cause easily observed changes in a patient’s vital signs when injected intravascularly. This can be an important tool, as the lack of aspiration of blood is not a reliable indicator that the needle is extravascular. The typical marker medication is epinephrine (0.5 mcg/kg, max 15 mcg), though isoproterenol has been used as well. Defined parameters for a positive test dose while under general anesthesia with sevoflurane have been published. These parameters include an increase in T-wave amplitude of 25% or more, increased blood pressure of 15 mm Hg or more, and an increase in heart rate of 10 bpm or more ( ; ; ; ). Changes in the T-wave amplitude in lead II of the ECG have been shown to be as effective as an increase in heart rate ( ). Anticholinergics (atropine or glycopyrrolate) increase the sensitivity of the test dose when it is performed in an anesthetized patient. Others have shown that the change in T-wave amplitude in lead II of the ECG was more reliable than the increase in heart rate ( ; ). These hemodynamic variables may not be as reliable when a patient is anesthetized using a total intravenous anesthetic. During these anesthetics, Polaner and colleagues found that blood pressure was the most consistent finding, as evidenced by an increase of at least 30% within 2 minutes. Heart rate changes were less reliable, and T-wave changes were not found to be a reliable indicator ( ).

Treatment

The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA; https://www.asra.com ) recommends that each institution that performs regional anesthesia have 20% lipid emulsion immediately available and the means for its rapid delivery. The ASRA has published a step-by-step process for treating LAST ( Fig. 24.1 ).

Fig. 24.1, Management of Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity.

It is important to avoid exacerbating disturbances such as hypoxia, hypoventilation, and tissue acidosis. Acidosis causes a decreased affinity of lipid rescue solution for local anesthetics, though the capacity remains unchanged ( ). Propofol should not be used, as the lipid content is too low to be of use and administration could potentiate hypotension. Benzodiazepines can be administered for seizure prevention. It is also best to avoid vasopressin, calcium channel blockers, beta blockers, and other local anesthetics. During resuscitation, the dose of epinephrine should be reduced to 1 mcg/kg instead of 10 mcg/kg. In rats, 10 mcg/kg of epinephrine decreased the chances of successful resuscitation from bupivacaine toxicity with lipid emulsion as evidenced by increased lactate, worsened acidosis, and poor recovery at 15 minutes ( ). Because LAST can recur, Marwick and colleagues recommended monitoring the patient for at least 12 hours ( ). Risks associated with administering lipid emulsion ( ) include infection, thrombophlebitis, altered inflammatory response, allergic reactions, embolization of emulsified fat particles, warfarin resistance, interference with ECMO circuits, increased intracerebral pressure after traumatic brain injury, weakness, altered mental status, and seizures.

Though many potential risks are associated with lipid rescue, nonetheless, lipid emulsion is still the single best treatment for systemic local anesthetic toxicity.

Compartment syndrome

A concern often cited for failure to perform a regional anesthetic in pediatric patients for orthopedic procedures is the risk for an unrecognized compartment syndrome. Compartment syndrome puts the patient at risk for muscle ischemia or loss of limb and must be recognized early so that decompressive fasciotomy may occur if necessary, prior to these serious complications.

Normal compartmental pressures are 0 to 12 mm Hg in adults and may be higher in children 13 to 16 years of age ( ). The compartment perfusion pressure (diastolic blood pressure–compartment pressure) in adults has been recommended to be >30 mm Hg. The exact perfusion pressure in children has not been defined.

The concern focuses on the possibility that the use of a local anesthetic in a regional block may mask the initial symptoms of the sensation of pressure in the limb that occurs with compartment syndrome ( ). The classic signs and symptoms include the “5 Ps”: pain (out of proportion and with passive stretching), pallor, paresthesia, paralysis, and pulselessness. Although Aguirre and colleagues noted that these signs and symptoms have a high specificity and negative predictive value (>97%), the sensitivity and positive predictive value of these findings are low ( Table 24.2 ).

TABLE 24.2
Diagnosis of Acute Compartment Syndrome
From Aguirre, J., Gresch, D., Popovici, A., et al. (2013). Case scenario: Compartment syndrome of the forearm in patient with an infraclavicular catheter: Breakthrough pain as indicator. Anesthesiology, 118, 1198–1205.
Pain Passive Stretch Pain Paresis Paresthesia %
Specificity, % 97 97 97 98
Sensitivity, % 19 19 13 13
PPV, % 14 14 11 15
NPV, % 98 98 98 98
Probability of ACS if one clinical sign present 25
Probability of ACS if three clinical signs present 93
ACS, Acute compartment syndrome; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.

Case reports in children have demonstrated that a successful epidural block with a low concentration of local anesthetic does not mask the symptoms of compartment syndrome. A literature review to assess the risk for compartment syndrome in children who have received epidurals revealed 12 cases ( ). In all cases, pain was the primary finding and was considered more severe than the clinical situation would explain. Five of the patients had compartment syndrome as a result of lithotomy position rather than operative site edema. The authors concluded that warning signs of compartment syndrome are the presence of increasing pain or pain that is remote to the site of surgery, an increase in analgesic requirements, paresthesia not due to analgesia, reduced perfusion, swelling, and pain on passive movement. They suggested that the presence of the epidural catheter did not result in delayed diagnosis but instead contributed to deficiencies in the system. At present, there is no evidenced-based data suggesting that the use of regional anesthesia in children increases the risk for compartment syndrome or delays its diagnosis ( ; ). Recommendations include the following: educating staff as to the signs and symptoms of compartment syndrome; identifying which patients are particularly at risk through discussion with the surgeon; using dilute local anesthetic solutions; using epidural catheters as close as possible to involved dermatomes; and assessing distribution and density of block frequently. Serial examinations should be performed on pediatric patients to assess the operated extremity in the presence of good analgesia. For the high-risk child, or if any question exists, measure compartmental pressures postoperatively, particularly in children who would clearly benefit from infusions of local anesthetic, such as those who have undergone microvascular surgery or amputation.

Pharmacologic differences between children and adults

Pharmacologic differences between pediatric and adult patients can significantly affect anesthetic management. Thus an appropriate knowledge of developmental pharmacology is important for administering regional anesthesia (see Chapter 8 : Developmental Pharmacology).

Pediatric patients have a proportionately larger surface area to body mass ratio than adult patients. The skin is not well developed early in life and has less keratinization; thus any agent that is topically applied must be dosed considering a greater absorption. Neonatal liver and kidney function is also immature, necessitating dosing adjustments for most medications, including local anesthetics. The plasma-binding proteins of neonates are also lower than in an adult, leading to higher free fraction of local anesthetics. Proteins such as albumin and alpha 1 acid glycoprotein do not reach adult levels until 10 months of age ( ; ; ). Additionally, the increased cardiac output increases the rate at which local anesthetics are absorbed systemically. Decreased drug metabolism can lead to accumulation of medications in the plasma. The underdeveloped blood-brain barrier allows for a greater amount of medication to cross to the central nervous system. These factors necessitate dosing adjustments, which include smaller volumes or a less concentrated solution to achieve appropriate and safe analgesia. Myelination is not complete at birth and continues to mature until 12 years of age. Local anesthetics can more easily penetrate the immature myelin sheath to reach the nerve fibers. Consequently, a denser nerve blockade can be achieved with a lower concentration and with a shorter onset time. Because of the decreased trapping of local anesthetics in the immature sheaths, duration of effect may be reduced.

The volume of CSF per kg is greater in neonates and infants than in adults. In addition, a larger percentage of the CSF is in the spinal axis. Consequently, on a mg/kg basis, neonates and infants require higher doses of intrathecal agents.

Local anesthetic agents

Bupivacaine

Bupivacaine is a racemic mixture of equimolar amounts of the enantiomers R(+) bupivacaine and S(−) bupivacaine. Pharmacokinetic studies of bupivacaine injected in the caudal space or epidural space (as noted in Table 24.3 ) have demonstrated differences between infants and children ( ; ; ). Infants have a greater volume of distribution (3.9 vs. 2.7 L/kg), an increased elimination half-life (7.7 vs. 4.6 hours), and decreased clearance (7.1 vs. 10.0 mL/kg per minute) compared with older children.

TABLE 24.3
Summary of Pharmacokinetics * of Local Anesthetics in Children
Block and Dosage Age of Child C max (mg/L) T max (min) Vd (L/kg) Cl (mL/kg/min) t½ (hr) Reference
Bupivacaine
Caudal 2.5 mg/kg 1–6 mo (0.55–1.93) (10–60) 3.9 ± 2.0 7.1 ± 3.2 7.7 ± 2.4
Epidural infusion 0.2 mg/kg/hr 11 mo–15 yr nm nm nm 6.49 (3.96–11.11) 3.36 ± 0.93
Caudal 2.5 mg/kg 0–5 mo 1.109 (0.6–2.195) 60 (30–240) nm nm 2.75 (1.7–4.4)
Caudal 2.5 mg/kg plus epinephrine 2.5 mcg/mL 1.102 (0.449–1.909) 60 (60–360) 6.05 (3.97–8.95)
Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric 2 mg/kg (0.5%) 2–16 yr 2.2 ± 1.0 24 ± 11.9 nm nm 3.6 ± 1.8 Ala-Kokko et al. 2002
Ropivacaine
Caudal 2 mg/kg 1–8 yr 0.47 ± 0.16 60 (12–249) 2.4 ± 0.7 7.4 ± 1.9 3.2 ± 0.8
Caudal 2 mg/kg <1 yr 0.73 ± 0.27 60 (15–90) nm nm nm
1–5 yr 0.49 ± 0.21 52.5 (30–120)
Caudal 2 mg/kg 0–3 mo .748 (0.425–1.579) nm 1.99 ± 1.7 4.8 ± 3.6 5.1
3–12 mo 604 (0.41–1.278) 2.42 ± 2.03 6.5 ± 5.3
Epidural 1.7 mg/kg 3–11 mo 0.61 (0.55–0.725) 60 (60–120) 2.37 (9%) 4.26 (9%) nm McCann et al. 2001
1–4 yr 0.64 (0.54–0.75) 60 (30–90) 2.37 (9%) 6.15 (11%) nm
Epidural infusion 0.4 mg/kg/hr 0.3–7.3 yr nm nm 3.1 (2.1–4.2) 8.5 (5.8–11.1) 4.9 (3–6.7) Hansen et al. 2000
Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric 2 mg/kg (0.75%) 2–16 yr 1.5 ± 0.8 35 ± 15.4 nm nm 6.5 ± 4.4 Ala-Kokko et al. 2002
Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric 3 mg/kg (0.5%) 1–12 yr 1.5 ± 0.93 45 (15–64) nm nm 2.0 ± 0.7 Dalens et al. 2001
Cl, Plasma clearance; C max , peak plasma concentration; mo, month; nm, not measured; T max , time to peak plasma concentration; t½, terminal half-life; Vd, volume of distribution; yr, year.

* Values are stated either with standard deviation (±) or with ranges or partition coefficients in parentheses.

These early cases of toxicity prompted an editorial by Berde, who addressed the false generalization that children were more resistant to local anesthetic toxicity than adults ( ). Berde recommended that the maximum allowable dosages of local anesthetics should not be exceeded (see Table 24.1 ), that infusion rates should be reduced in children with risk factors for seizures, and that the maximum allowable dosages should be reduced by at least 30% for infants younger than 6 months of age ( ).

Ropivacaine

Ropivacaine has become a commonly used local anesthetic in pediatric patients, with onset times similar to bupivacaine and durations of actions that are similar or perhaps slightly longer than bupivacaine ( ; ; ; ). Ropivacaine has a lower risk for CNS and cardiac toxicity than bupivacaine. In a pharmacokinetic study of ropivacaine in children ages 1 to 8 who were administered 1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine for caudal block, the free plasma concentrations were well below toxic levels ( ). The pharmacokinetics are noted in Table 24.3 . When infants younger than 3 months of age were compared with infants 3 months to 1 year of age, the maximum free concentration of ropivacaine was significantly higher in the younger age group (99 mcg/L versus 38 mcg/L). The total and free plasma concentrations in all of the children younger than 1 year of age were within the range of concentrations previously reported for adults and older children ( ; ; ).

Epidural ropivacaine in children 1 to 9 years of age was studied to determine pharmacokinetics and safety of 24- to 72-hour infusions ( ). After a 2-mg/kg bolus, an infusion of 2 mg/mL at 0.4 mg/kg per hour was delivered and resulted in plasma concentrations that remained stable throughout the infusion and were well below toxic levels.

Levobupivacaine

Levobupivacaine is the S(−) enantiomer of bupivacaine and is less toxic to the CNS or heart than the racemic bupivacaine ( ; ; ). In pediatric studies, levobupivacaine resulted in wide ranges of plasma concentrations. In children younger than 2 years of age, Chalkiadis and colleagues found that the time to peak plasma concentration ranged between 5 and 60 minutes and was later in children younger than 3 months of age ( ).

Adjuncts to local anesthetic agents

When administered perineurally, or via the neuraxis, local anesthetics provide excellent analgesia. However, a number of factors limit their usefulness in the treatment of both acute postoperative and chronic pain. First, they have a limited duration of action when administered as a single dose. Depending on the local anesthetic selected and site of injection, analgesia lasts between 1 and 12 hours. Second, they have narrow safety margins with cardiotoxic and neurotoxic consequences when adherence to maximum tolerable doses is not followed or inadvertent intravascular injection occurs. Neonates and infants are at higher risk for toxicity than older children because of decreased levels of binding, increased free drug fraction, and reduced hepatic clearance. Consequently, adjunctive agents can increase the duration of local anesthetic action, allow for dose reduction, or alert the provider to inadvertent intravascular injection. The ideal adjunct should achieve all three of these goals and not add additional risk(s) to the patient. The use of adjuncts is widely practiced, and in a survey of members of the Association of Pediatric Anesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, the rates of adjunct usage in caudal blocks were reported between 58% ( ) and 67% ( ).

Although this perineural multimodal analgesic strategy may ultimately identify the “holy grail” for improving patient care by capitalizing on the benefits and minimizing the risks associated with large doses of each additional single drug at a time ( ), Walker and Yaksh noted in a comprehensive review of preclinical and clinical data that the relative risk benefit of the various adjuncts is difficult to determine in view of the variability of the studies, the relative lack of detailed data regarding long-term complications, and the concern about the developing spinal cord’s susceptibility to drug toxicity ( ).

Epinephrine

Epinephrine is a commonly used adjunct and the only adjunct added by drug manufacturers to their marketed local anesthetic preparations. Typically, it has been used in a concentration of 5 mcg/mL (1:200,000), with the intent of identifying inadvertent intravascular injection (test dose) and/or prolonging local anesthetic action. The test dose of epinephrine is typically limited to 0.5 mcg/kg (0.1 mL/kg of a 1:200,000 solution) to a maximum dose of 15 mcg.

A positive test dose after intravenous injection of 0.5 to 1 mcg/kg of epinephrine is defined as an increase in heart rate of 10 to 20 bpm, a 25% change in T-wave amplitude, ST segment changes on ECG, or a 10% increase in systolic blood pressure. Polaner and colleagues suggested that blood pressure changes are the most sensitive finding in patients undergoing total intravenous anesthesia ( ). During caudal administration, epinephrine does prolong the action of short-acting local anesthetics but has less effect on long-acting local anesthetics such as bupivacaine or ropivacaine. Epinephrine has been demonstrated to decrease C max without affecting time to peak concentration ( ). Its effects are most profoundly seen in neonates and infants and only to a limited degree in older children ( ). In 2012 a case series describing devastating neurologic complications after epidural analgesia in four children raised concern regarding the use of epinephrine in the epidural space ( ). Editorial recommendations included limiting the dose of epinephrine within the epidural space to a test dose of 0.5 mcg/kg in 0.1 mL/kg ( ).

Opioids

Opioids have been widely used as adjuncts to neuraxial blocks for many years and are still commonly used today. Although their synergistic effect when combined with local anesthetics has been repeatedly demonstrated, the optimal choice of opioid still gives rise to both debate and confusion. There is a widespread misconception that neuraxial opioids produce analgesia exclusively by a selective spinal mechanism. This is simply not true; in fact, uptake into the systemic circulation with subsequent redistribution to brainstem opioid receptors is commonly the mechanism by which analgesia is achieved. The reason for this is the relatively long distances neuraxial opioids must diffuse to access opioid receptors in the spinal cord dorsal horn. In the process, they can partition into tissues other than the spinal cord or be cleared into plasma, both of which decrease the amount of drug available to bind to spinal opioid receptors ( ).

Spinal bioavailability of epidurally administered opioids is dependent on the complex interaction of a number of factors, including redistribution from the epidural space to surrounding tissues, meningeal permeability, dural blood flow, and CSF spread ( ). Consequently, when administered by epidural infusion, the spinal bioavailability of hydrophilic opioids (e.g., morphine, diamorphine, hydromorphone) is superior to that of hydrophobic opioids (e.g., alfentanil, fentanyl, sufentanil). Fentanyl may be the most common lipid-soluble opioid used in the epidural space. Epidural fentanyl infusion produces analgesia by plasma uptake and redistribution to brain/peripheral opioid receptors, whereas an epidural fentanyl bolus produces analgesia by a selective spinal mechanism ( ). These findings are likely explained by the fact that a fentanyl bolus results in a much larger amount of fentanyl in the epidural space than occurs at any single time point during a fentanyl infusion. Thus even though only a small fraction of the administered fentanyl is able to reach spinal cord opioid receptors, in the case of the fentanyl bolus, this small fraction is sufficient to produce a brief, spinally mediated analgesic effect ( ).

Alpha 2 agonists

The analgesic effects of epidural clonidine were first demonstrated in 1984 ( ). Since then, numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of clonidine in humans. Epidural doses of 1 to 2 mcg/kg are effective in prolonging the action of local anesthetics and enhancing their effects ( ). Independent of dose, clonidine extends the duration of single-shot caudal analgesia by about 4 hours ( ). Higher doses are associated with increased risk for sedation, bradycardia, and hypotension. Based on three reports where a 100-fold overdose of caudal clonidine was administered to children (14 months to 5 years of age), the margin of safety for clonidine does seem to be wide. Somnolence was observed in all three patients, without cardiorespiratory consequences ( ). However, in some case reports of neonates and infants younger than 3 months of age, clonidine is not recommended because of possible increased risk for respiratory depression or apnea. The immature respiratory system in preterm infants may put them at higher risk for clonidine-induced respiratory depression ( ).

The analgesia derived from epidural infusion of dilute local anesthetics is improved by the addition of clonidine (0.1 mcg/kg/hr). Additionally, the use of clonidine rather than opioids for this purpose eliminates the risk for opioid-related side effects such as pruritus and nausea ( ).

Clonidine as an analgesic adjuvant to peripheral nerve blocks is controversial. As α 2 -adrenergic receptors are not found in peripheral nerves, the mechanism of action for clonidine in this setting is limited to local vasoconstriction or via an alternate, non-α-adrenoreceptor effect altogether ( ). More specifically, clonidine, and the more superselective α 2 blocker dexmedetomidine, prolongs the duration of analgesia by blocking the so-called hyperpolarization-activated cation current ( ). This results in prolonged hyperpolarization of the nerve and an analgesic action. This may also produce a selective sensory effect, as this action appears to be more pronounced in C fibers (pain) than in A-alpha fibers (motor).

Early studies suggested that lidocaine onset times were reduced, and analgesia was prolonged. However, subsequent studies have been less convincing. A systematic review of 27 double-blind randomized controlled trials in adults found mixed results. Clonidine appeared to be more effective when added to local anesthetics for upper-limb blocks than in lower extremities ( ). Pediatric studies are limited, but a retrospective pediatric audit found that the sensory block of dilute (≤0.2%) bupivacaine or ropivacaine was extended by a few hours and that the incidence of motor block was increased compared with local anesthetic alone ( ).

Clonidine may be viewed as the most useful adjunct for regional anesthesia in children ( ). A single dose of 1 mcg/kg has been recommended for caudal, spinal, or perineural administration, whereas Lönnqvist recommends an infusion rate of 0.1 mcg/kg/hr for epidural or perineural administration ( ). Unintentional intraneural injection of local anesthetic during the performance of peripheral nerve blocks still occurs despite the use of ultrasound guidance. Although this rarely results in permanent sequelae, significant nerve injury may occur. In this setting, the adjunct use of clonidine may be advantageous, as animal studies have shown a protective effect when administered at the site of injury ( ).

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α 2 agonist that has demonstrated promising results when used in the neuraxis or for peripheral nerve blocks. Furthermore, evidence exists that dexmedetomidine has antiapoptotic properties and might even have a future role as a neuroprotective agent ( ). Data in children is limited at this time, but a meta-analysis of six pediatric studies (328 patients) demonstrated a significantly longer duration of caudal analgesia (time to first analgesic requirements) in patients receiving dexmedetomidine (1 to 2 mcg/kg) with local anesthetic (bupivacaine or ropivacaine) compared with local anesthetic alone. Side effects in the two groups were comparable without significant differences in hemodynamic changes or emergence time. The authors concluded that dexmedetomidine as an additive to local anesthetic provides a significantly longer postoperative analgesia with comparable adverse effects and hemodynamic changes compared with local anesthetics alone, but data on the effects of different concentrations of dexmedetomidine is currently insufficient. In caudal blocks, 1 mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine had similar effects as 2 mcg/kg ( ).

No data are currently available for dexmedetomidine in the context of peripheral nerve blocks in children, but adult volunteer data show that adjunct administration of dexmedetomidine prolongs the duration of ulnar nerve block by 60% ( ).

Neostigmine

Adjunctive neostigmine (1 to 4 mcg/kg) has been shown to prolong analgesia for 9 to 10 hours after single-shot caudal block. This action is presumably due to a muscarinic effect at the level of the spinal cord. However, caudal neostigmine is associated with a 30% incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting ( ).

Ketamine

Ketamine is a noncompetitive NMDA and mild mu-receptor agonist that has proved effective as an adjunct for caudal analgesia in doses similar to those used for intravenous pain relief (0.25 to 1 mg/kg). The most valid argument for a spinally mediated effect is that the duration of postoperative analgesia achieved with preservative-free S-ketamine is substantially longer than the effect of a similar intramuscular dose ( ). Higher doses than those mentioned earlier result in unwanted side effects (sedation, hallucinations, nystagmus, nausea, and vomiting) without additional analgesic benefit. Age-dependent neurotoxic effects of intrathecal ketamine have been demonstrated in animal studies ( ). Although the clinical relevance of these findings remains undetermined, the result has been that ketamine is no longer recommended as a local anesthetic adjunct in a number of countries.

Steroids

Dexamethasone has attracted interest as a local anesthetic adjunct for regional anesthesia. Its activity is thought to be mediated by attenuating the release of inflammatory mediators, reducing ectopic neuronal discharge, and inhibiting potassium channel–mediated discharge of nociceptive C fibers ( ). Early results seem promising, especially when mixed with other adjuncts ( ). A meta-analysis of nine trials (801 adults) demonstrated that dexamethasone prolonged analgesic duration for long-acting local anesthetics from 730 to 1306 minutes and intermediate-acting local anesthetics from 168 to 343 minutes. Motor block was prolonged from 664 to 1102 minutes ( ). Notably, Desmet and colleagues demonstrated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of adults undergoing shoulder surgery an equivalent prolongation of perineural administered dexamethasone with systemic administration of dexamethasone ( ).

Dexamethasone is not approved for perineural administration by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Health Canada (HC), the European Union (EU), or any other regulatory body. Finally, basic cytotoxicity research shows more neuronal death with higher concentrations of dexamethasone when combined with clinically relevant concentrations of local anesthetics ( ). In view of the lack of pediatric studies coupled with the basic science studies and clinical adult studies, the adjunct use of dexamethasone in pediatric regional anesthesia should be restricted to clinical trials ( ). The effectiveness of perineural adjuncts is still in question and will need further trials to clarify their role. It is important to note that their use is off-label and not likely to be approved by the FDA for this purpose ( ).

Techniques for regional block placement

Nerve stimulation

Prior to the introduction of ultrasound, peripheral nerve blocks were historically performed using either paresthesia or nerve stimulation. Eliciting paresthesias is often uncomfortable for patients, and the ever-present specter of nerve damage caused by nerve impalement has limited widespread and enthusiastic adoption of this technique. Consequently, electrical stimulation emerged as an alternative technique for nerve localization; as early as 1928, it was used to locate the brachial plexus. The needles are insulated along the entire shaft, and exposed metal is limited to the tip. Peripheral nerve stimulators (PNSs) work by producing an electrical stimulus that depolarizes the nerve membrane, initiates an action potential that stimulates the muscle, and causes a contraction. There is a minimum current required to initiate an action potential called a rheobase. The stimulus must also be applied for a length of time to initiate the impulse, called the chronaxie (twice the rheobase). The chronaxie varies in different nerves, depending on their sensitivities and refractory periods. Faster conduction nerves like the A-alpha motor nerve fibers have smaller chronaxie and therefore can be stimulated without causing pain.

The threshold current is the lowest current that produces a motor response. Stimulus intensity decreases in proportion to the distance from the nerve. Values of 0.2 mA to 0.5 mA are ideal to ensure a successful block. However, there have been reports of no motor response at 1.5 mA even when the needle is seen by ultrasound to be in close proximity to the nerve. Values less than 0.2 mA are concerning for intraneural needle placement. PNS techniques are most frequently used when nerve visualization with ultrasound is difficult, or technically challenging (e.g., lumbar plexus). When using PNS, a neuromuscular blocking agent is contraindicated during block placement.

Disease states may alter the ability to elicit motor responses. In children, Charcot-Marie-Tooth syndrome, diabetes, and chemotherapy can affect axonal function and the responses to electrical stimulation. Consequently, twitch responses may be unpredictable, and detection of intraneural needle placement at conventional and elevated current levels impaired. Differences in nerve stimulation between healthy and pathologic nerves are not well studied.

In addition to peripheral nerve blocks, electrical stimulation may also be used during epidural needle and catheter placement. Using the principles of electrophysiology similar to those of peripheral nerve blockade, the Tsui test is effective for guidance of the catheter to within two segmental levels. Additionally, it allows detection of intrathecal, intravascular, or subdural catheter placement. The test may also be used during either single-injection or continuous caudal anesthesia with cephalad catheter advancement.

Ultrasound

Ultrasound use for regional anesthesia allows visualization of the internal anatomy and demonstration of the block needle during placement (see Chapter 20 : Point of Care Ultrasonography). Visualization of structures allows the clinician to avoid unintentional injury to structures such as blood vessels and nerves. The first cases of ultrasound use for nerve blocks date back to the 1970s, with continued expansion of the technology to almost all forms of regional anesthesia. The use of ultrasound has been shown to increase block success and quality. At the same time, it has decreased the required amount of local anesthetic and the time for block placement compared with nerve-stimulating techniques ( ). Ultrasound can demonstrate needle position, surrounding structures, and spread of solution after injection ( ; ). Its use becomes more important when performing blocks on neonates, infants, and small children when adult landmarks and measurements may not be accurate. The use of ultrasound for regional techniques in general has shown a reduction in pneumothorax and local anesthetic systemic toxicity, though overall, the incidence of peripheral nerve injury remains low and consistent with historical data regarding nerve stimulation techniques ( ).

Physics

Understanding ultrasound requires a basic understanding of the physics of sound waves. Sound is a result of energy that is created by waves of pressure transmitted through matter such as air, liquid, or tissue. An ultrasound wave is created through the mechanical deformation of specific crystals by an electric field that causes oscillations. These oscillations project a high-frequency sound, or an ultrasound wave. This phenomenon is called the piezoelectric effect. The crystals in an ultrasound probe are piezoelectric crystals. Medical ultrasound has a frequency between 2 and 13 MHz, with a speed in tissue of around 1500 m/s. The average wavelength for medical ultrasound is less than 1 mm, which makes structures smaller than this difficult or impossible to accurately define. Most structures that need to be visualized, such as nerves for a regional technique or major vasculature, are large enough to be easily defined.

To generate an image, an ultrasound wave is projected from the probe and transmitted through the desired medium. When the sound wave encounters a structure, the wave is reflected backward to the probe. The amount of the ultrasound waves, or the strength of signal, determine how bright the displayed signal is on the imaging screen. The round-trip time from projection, reflection, and reception determines the depth of the target structure. The echogenicity of an image is used to describe its brightness on the screen. If an image is the same shade as the rest of the medium, the image is said to be isoechoic. If a structure is hyperechoic, the image is brighter than the surrounding structures. Further, a hypoechoic image is darker than the surrounding medium. If there is an absence of reflected waves, the area is anechoic. Examples of each are listed in Table 24.4 . The appearance of structures of interest are listed in Table 24.5 .

TABLE 24.4
Ultrasound Terminology
Echogenicity Definition Example
Isoechoic Same brightness as the background Tissues, a uniform medium
Hyperechoic Brighter than the background Bone
Hypoechoic Darker than the background Lymph nodes
Anechoic Absence of echoes Blood vessels

TABLE 24.5
Ultrasound Appearance of Various Tissues
Structure Appearance
Nerves Round, oval, flat, fusiform, triangular; hyperechoic with hypoechoic areas within; sometimes honeycomb in appearance
Tendons Hyperechoic; sometimes difficult to distinguish from nerves
Blood vessels Anechoic; round or oval shaped; arteries are pulsatile, veins are easily compressible
Bone Very echogenic on the surface with significant dropout artifact below
Fat Hypoechoic
Muscle Hypoechoic with fascial planes that can be hyperechoic
Pleura Hyperechoic surface with hypoechoic parenchyma

Terminology

The speed at which an ultrasound beam travels through a medium is the acoustic velocity. This differs depending on the tissue and has an effect on the image that is displayed. The stiffness of a material is its resistance to compression, which affects the propagation speed. The stiffer a substance, the faster the propagation speed. The resistance to a wave transmitted through a substance is defined by its acoustic impedance.

The frequency of a probe will determine the depth of penetration and the resolution of the image. A high-frequency probe will have a higher resolution, but it will not penetrate as far as a low-frequency probe. The depth of penetration is affected by the attenuation coefficient. This is used to estimate the amount of signal loss in a certain substance as a function of ultrasound frequency.

Axial resolution determines how well structures can be distinguished in superficial and deep planes—that is, one structure above the other. Lateral resolution determines how well structures can be distinguished when they are beside each other. Temporal resolution is important in observing objects that are in motion, such as heart valves.

Structures, especially nerves, display an angular dependence for best resolution. In other words, tilting the transducer may improve or diminish the image of the structure. The best images are produced when the structures are at right angles to the beam, maximizing the amount of signal returning to the probe. This property is known as anisotropy.

Modes

As the technology of ultrasound has improved over the years, different modes have been developed and used in medicine. A-mode displays the echoes received from the tissue as a series of spikes that correspond to the depth of the reflecting target. This is the oldest mode of ultrasound and is not applicable to regional anesthesia. B-mode, the most commonly used mode, creates a two-dimensional picture. The signal received from the tissue is represented by a dot, whose brightness is determined by the amplitude of the signal. The time that it takes to send and receive a signal (the round-trip time) determines the depth of the dot on the display. The quality of the image is, at least in part, determined by the frame rate. M-mode, which is used commonly in echocardiography, is used for imaging structures that are rapidly moving, such as heart valves, with a single scan line that can be displayed in a wave-like manner. Doppler ultrasound provides a color representation of flow using the physics of the Doppler effect. Commonly, red and blue coloration provides information on the direction and velocity of flow. This mode can be used to confirm the presence of blood vessels when scanning for a target nerve and confirm the position of a catheter tip by injecting through the catheter to create a signal.

Artifacts

An ultrasound machine emits and receives signals to generate images in real time. Though it may seem to be a continuous video, what the practitioner is viewing is actually a series of images displayed in rapid succession. Artifacts are commonly seen during ultrasonography, which can alter the image displayed on the view screen. The most common artifact is the contact artifact, which is a dropout of the image due to a loss of the acoustic coupling medium between the skin and the transducer ( Fig. 24.2 ). A reverberation artifact is the repeated reflection of the image of a highly reflective surface, such as an echogenic needle ( Fig. 24.3 ). Acoustic shadowing is an area devoid of image due to a highly reflective surface, such as bone, through which the ultrasound waves cannot pass ( Fig. 24.4 ). A propagation speed artifact, also known as a bayonet artifact, occurs when the medium through which the ultrasound beam travels changes, subsequently changing its speed. This change causes a bending of the image on the ultrasound screen much like the bending of light changes the image of a straw placed in water ( Fig. 24.5 ).

Fig. 24.2, Contact Artifact.

Fig. 24.3, Reverberation Artifact.

Fig. 24.4, Acoustic Shadowing.

Fig. 24.5, Propagation Speed Artifact.

Probes

There are many different probes used in medical ultrasound. Each uses piezoelectric crystals to produce an ultrasound beam. A probe alternates between generating a beam and receiving the reflected signals. There are many manufacturers providing various tools to improve ultrasound technique. In general, ultrasound probes come in various frequencies that provide a wide selection of resolutions and penetration. In general, ultrasound probes for regional anesthesia use a frequency between 3 and 15 MHz. A high-frequency probe, such as the 13 to 6 MHz, will provide excellent superficial resolution but will not penetrate very deeply. Conversely, a low-frequency probe, such as many of the curvilinear probes, will penetrate much farther at the expense of resolution. It is important to be familiar with the selection of probes available to increase the chances of a successful regional technique. For example, when imaging superficial structures like the interscalene or supraclavicular nerve, a probe with a frequency higher than 7 MHz is preferred. Probes with frequencies higher than 10 MHz will provide better resolution, but the tissue penetration may be limited to 2 to 3 centimeters. The sciatic nerve in the subgluteal region or popliteal fossa requires deeper tissue penetration, and frequencies lower than 7 MHz are required. The footprint, or length and width, of a probe varies, with the curvilinear probes generally having a larger surface area. A smaller footprint is necessary for smaller patients and areas such as the supraclavicular fossa.

Needles

There are multiple needles on the market available for regional anesthesia. Almost any needle can be used with ultrasound to place a block, though some are more echogenic than others. A common problem with needle visualization is when the needle is nearly parallel to the ultrasound beam; few reflections are sent back to the probe to produce an image. In an attempt to facilitate visualization during block placement, manufacturers have altered needles with microscopic glass beads, reflectors, and etching ( ). These alterations are meant to send more ultrasound reflections back to the probe, even at steep angles. Most needles that are marketed as hyperechoic can provide a more echogenic image ( ). Catheters and their placement are covered elsewhere in this chapter.

With an understanding of the principles of ultrasonography and their application, as well as appropriate equipment and technique, one can provide reliable and effective regional anesthesia. The clarity of the ultrasound image, needle visualization, and type of catheter affect the rate of success and associated side effects ( ; ).

Needle handling and tip localization

Two simple nomenclatures describe needle advancement in relation to the ultrasound transducer. Out-of-plane or cross-sectional technique positions the needle transverse to the observed image. Although this approach offers the shortest skin-to-nerve distance, with a potential benefit of decreased patient discomfort, the needle shaft and tip are not clearly visualized and are deduced by transducer tilting or alignment and by tissue movement. In-plane or in-line technique advocates longitudinal advancement of the needle. This allows complete shaft/tip imaging but requires training, may create reverberation artifact, and may be inappropriate for continuous catheter placement. Hydrolocation refers to injection of a small amount of liquid (0.5 mL) to find the needle tip on the ultrasound image. Needle visualization requires considerable training and is often a source of frustration for beginners. It is prudent to adjust the image by manipulating the transducer rather than by blindly advancing the needle. When describing the position of the ultrasound probe in relation to the body, there are three spatial planes to consider. These planes are described in Box 24.4 .

BOX 24.4
Spatial Planes of the Body

Coronal

  • Any plane that divides the body into ventral (front) and dorsal (back). Also known as the frontal plane.

Transverse

  • Any plane that divides the body into a superior (top) and an inferior (bottom).

Sagittal

  • Any plane that divides the body into a left and a right.

Neuraxial blocks

Neuraxial anesthetic techniques have been applied to pediatrics since the earliest days of anesthesiology. When August Bier pioneered spinal anesthesia in 1898 two of his first six patients were children. Spinal anesthesia became popular for infants in the early 1900s, and its popularity has fluctuated ever since then ( ). first reported the use of caudal anesthesia for cystoscopy in children. Though Campbell used the caudal block for surgical anesthesia, the caudal became and remains one of the most widely used regional analgesic techniques in pediatrics, usually done in combination with general anesthesia ( ; ). Concern for potential neurotoxicity of general anesthetic agents in the developing brain, and the opioid abuse epidemic in the United States, have led to a renewed interest in pediatric neuraxial techniques ( ). Though the link between early exposure to general anesthetics and the later development of learning disabilities remains inconclusive ( ; ), the use of regional blockade may decrease the possible neurotoxicity of general anesthetics in the developing brain and decrease opioid requirements in the perioperative period ( ).

Indications and benefits

In general, the caudal block provides excellent and reliable analgesia for surgical procedures below the level of the umbilicus. The duration of the block depends on the choice of local anesthetic, the dose, and what, if any, adjuncts are added ( ). The caudal block is relatively easy to perform; found that it takes 30 attempts, on average, to achieve an 80% success rate for people first performing the technique. The benefits of a caudal block include reduced anesthetic requirements intraoperatively and reduced perioperative opioid requirements. Caudal blocks are typically used in combination with general anesthesia, though reported its use as a primary surgical anesthetic.

The principal benefit of continuous epidural analgesia is reduced postoperative opioid requirements and reduced opioid side effects (nausea and vomiting, constipation, pruritus, sedation, and respiratory depression) ( ; ). Because pediatric epidural catheters are typically placed after the induction of general anesthesia and prior to the onset of the surgical procedure, they can potentially reduce the surgical stress response and the release of catecholamines. Epidural catheters can also decrease anesthetic requirements intraoperatively and improve ventilation postoperatively. Epidurals can reduce opioid requirements, facilitate the early return of bowel function ( ), and also reduce hospital and pediatric intensive care unit lengths of stay ( ).

Spinal anesthesia is less commonly used than general anesthesia in pediatrics but has regained interest (see Chapter 33 : Anesthesia for General Abdominal and Urologic Surgery). Spinal anesthesia provides a reliable, dense block for procedures below the umbilicus such as inguinal hernia repair or testicular torsion release. Infant spinals have a relatively short duration (60 to 75 minutes), requiring close coordination between surgical and anesthesia teams ( ). Spinals for ex-preterm infants were thought to avoid postoperative apnea observed after general anesthetics; however, in a randomized controlled trial of infants 60 weeks postconception age or younger, patients receiving spinal anesthesia had lower rates of early apnea (up to 30 minutes postop) but a similar rate of late apnea (30 minutes to 12 hours) as patients receiving a general anesthetic (2% in both groups) ( ). There remains a potential neurodevelopmental benefit of avoiding general anesthesia in infants with spinal anesthesia. However, the General Anaesthesia compared to Spinal anaesthesia (GAS) study comparing the neurocognitive development in patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery who were under 1 year of age at the time of surgery and who were randomized to either spinal or inhalational anesthesia found no difference in neurodevelopmental outcome when patients were tested at 2 and 5 years of age ( ; ).

Contraindications and risks

Contraindications to neuraxial anesthetic techniques in pediatrics include patient or guardian refusal, infection at the needle insertion site, spina bifida or tethered cord, and local anesthetic allergy. Additionally, increased intracranial pressure has long been considered a contraindication to neuraxial techniques ( ). High-volume epidural injections, and caudal blocks in particular, probably increase intracranial pressure above baseline and may reduce cerebral blood flow and oxygenation. This finding is probably not of concern for children without intracranial pathology, but for children at risk of increased intracranial pressure, even conventional caudal dosing (i.e., 1 mL/kg) does elevate ICP above baseline. Therapeutic anticoagulation is another clear contraindication for any neuraxial procedure, as is congenital bleeding diathesis. Routine screening with coagulation studies is not necessary in healthy children unless otherwise indicated by patient or family history.

In general, pediatric neuraxial procedures are safe and effective; the known complications are rare and tend to be minor. studied the complications of pediatric epidural anesthesia in a prospective study of pediatric epidurals performed in Great Britain and Ireland at 21 pediatric sites over a 5-year period (2001 to 2005). There were merely 96 complications reported in 10,633 epidurals performed. Five of these incidents were graded as serious (1:2000), and only 1 child had residual effects at 12 months (1:10,000). The overall incident rate was lower (0.37%) in hospitals where over 200 pediatric epidurals were performed each year, compared with hospitals that performed fewer than 100 per year (0.58%). Most of the difference in the low volume center’s complication rate related to drug errors and local anesthetic overdoses as opposed to technical errors. Llewellyn and Moriarty reported just 6 incidents of postdural puncture headache, all occurring in children older than 8 years of age. Only one of these six cases required an epidural blood patch. All six patients required two attempts at catheter placement, three for failure to locate the epidural space on the first attempt, and three for an accidental dural puncture on the first attempt. In the French-Language Society of Pediatric Anesthesiology study, surveyed 47 institutions, representing over 10,000 neuraxial blocks (8493 being caudal blocks), and found just 10 incidents of accidental dural puncture. Six of these occurred with caudal blocks in babies.

, using data from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN) database, noted no complications in over 6000 caudal blocks. Three of 2946 neuraxial catheters had paresthesia. Thirty-two (11%) patients had local inflammation or infection, and no patients were reported to have an epidural abscess, meningitis, or deep infection. Hypotension was rare and occurred in seven patients. Six of the seven patients were older children with thoracic epidurals. All of these patients were treated by decreasing the rates on the epidural infusions.

Serious complications in pediatric neuraxial anesthesia, such as nerve damage, paralysis, epidural hematoma, and abscess, are extremely rare. In a survey of 10 French and Belgian institutions ( ), there were 5 cases of catastrophic complications involving 24,005 neuraxial procedures. All five cases were infants less than 12 weeks old and all five suffered permanent paralysis. These complications were fatal in three cases, and of the two surviving infants one became paraplegic and the other quadriplegic. The exact mechanism of injury could not be identified in a retrospective review, but loss of resistance to air was common to all five cases. An air bubble in an epidural vein can cause local inflammation and thrombosis or be transmitted to the cerebral venous system. reported four cases of long-term neurologic injury associated with routine epidural catheter placement. Possible mechanisms of injury identified in these cases were the effect of hydrostatic pressure from injection into the epidural space leading to vascular compromise.

There is special concern for spinal cord ischemia when epinephrine is injected into the epidural space. Three of five of patients had epinephrine added to the local anesthetic used for a loading or bolus dose. Epinephrine should be avoided in continuous epidural infusions, and epinephrine test dose should be limited to 0.5 mcg/kg ( ).

A potential risk of neuraxial techniques that has so far not been reported in the pediatric anesthesia literature is epidermoid tumors. Spinal epidermoid cysts are benign cystic tumors lined by squamous epithelium within the spinal canal. Acquired epidermoid tumors, resulting from epidermal cells carried into the epidural space by a needle, are rare. To date there are no known epidermoid tumors resulting from neuraxial blocks in pediatrics. All known reported pediatric cases of acquired epidermoid tumors are from lumbar punctures, not caudal or spinal anesthetics ( ; ). Although the use of styletted needles should decrease the risk of tissue coring, epidermoid tumors have resulted when styletted needles have been used ( ).

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common problem after major pediatric surgery, but the relationship between neuraxial anesthesia and POUR is not well understood. In general, blocking lumbosacral dermatomes, and the use of neuraxial opioids, increases the risk of POUR, but POUR has multifactorial etiology, and neuraxial anesthesia is just one of many potential causes. Local anesthetics acting on lumbosacral fibers block both afferent and efferent innervation of the bladder. Urinary retention was not reported in a large review of caudal complications from the PRAN database ( ), because it is a technique that always covers lumbosacral dermatomes. Bladder catheterization is a common monitor in major surgery but also carries risks of increased nosocomial infection, and more selective use of bladder catheterization in the postoperative period has been encouraged ( ; ). Whether children with epidural catheters require bladder catheters because of urinary retention remains an open question. In a study of 120 adults with epidural catheters, the rate of POUR was 33%, and the level of epidural insertion (lumbar vs thoracic) and use of epidurally administered opioids made no difference in the occurrence of POUR ( ). In another study of 92 pediatric patients undergoing pelvic orthopedic surgery with lumbar epidurals, 25% had POUR, defined as the failure to void 12 hours after surgery ( ). Interestingly, toilet-trained children had increased incidence of POUR than non-toilet-trained children (18% vs 6.25%). In adolescents undergoing thoracoscopic Nuss procedures, urinary retention was greater in patients with thoracic epidurals (55%) than in patients who had patient controlled analgesia (PCA) (26%, P = 0.002). A potential confounding factor in this study was that patients who had an epidural were 2.2 times more likely to have an intraoperative Foley catheter placed than the PCA patients ( ). Epidural opioids have been strongly associated with POUR, with lumbar opioids being more likely to cause POUR than thoracic; an effect that has been reversed with naloxone ( ). At least in adults, discontinuing the urinary catheter before the epidural rarely results in POUR. In adult thoracic surgery patients, removal of Foley catheters early in the postoperative period and continuing the epidural analgesia resulted in urinary retention requiring reinsertion of the bladder catheter in merely 6.6% of patients ( ).

The most common complication of the infant spinal anesthetic is a failed block. One large study found a failure rate of 10% for spinal anesthetics requiring conversion to general anesthesia ( ). The only predictor of failed spinal in the analysis was a bloody tap on the first attempt. The odds ratio of this risk factor was 2.46.

Preganglionic sympathetic blockade causing cardiovascular collapse seen in adults with high spinals is rare in infants. Children under age 5 years have little hemodynamic changes after administration of neuraxial local anesthetic, including a high spinal ( ). The earliest sign of high spinal in the infant is apnea, and respiratory support is most often required ( ). This difference between adult and pediatric reactions to high spinal blockade has been attributed to the immaturity of the sympathetic nervous system and differences in CSF volume and spinal cord surface area. Young children have proportionately smaller lower extremity blood volume, so less venous pooling occurs and consequently less hemodynamic change.

The postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is relatively common after adult spinal anesthesia but is thought to be rare in infants and young children. This may be more a function of the inability to articulate the complaint in these age groups. In older children and adolescents, the incidence of PDPH approaches that seen in adults, and may require an epidural blood patch if conservative management fails ( ). The use of atraumatic, small-bore styletted spinal needles minimizes the risk of PDPH. Low back pain is a relatively common complaint after the resolution of spinal anesthesia in children, with an incidence of 5% to 10% ( ). Back ache can be either due to direct needle trauma to the muscles and ligaments of the back, or a sign of subclinical neurotoxicity from the local anesthetic.

Anatomic considerations and techniques

There are several important anatomic considerations when performing neuraxial anesthesia in children. Traditional teaching states that the spinal cord may end as low as L3 in infants rather than L1 in adults. Also, it is claimed that the dural sac may extend as low as S3–S4 in young infants, which requires thoughtful consideration during needle placement for caudal blocks. However, Shin demonstrated that the dural sac in children younger than 36 months of age may be higher than previously thought and may terminate at S2 ( ). Even in children up to approximately 6 years of age, the dural sac ascended only slightly on sonographic examination, to remain near the level of S1 or S2, the adult level ( ). Using ultrasound, observed that the median termination of the spinal cord corresponds to vertebral level L2 in neonates. Consequently, a conus medullaris (terminal end of the spinal cord) that extends below L3 should raise concern for a tethered spinal cord. From a practical perspective, Tuffier’s line (intercristal line, a transverse line that connects the superior iliac crests and on x-ray, generally corresponds to the L4–L5 interspace) provides a simple method of determining a level that is caudal to the termination of the spinal cord, at approximately the L4/L5 in a prone neonate and the upper margins of L5 when flexed ( ). However, it is important to note that palpation and imaging generally yield differences in the intercristal line, with palpation identifying a higher level (L3) than that identified by imaging (L4) ( ).

The curvature of the spine changes throughout development, with a cervical lordosis becoming more evident at around 6 months of age and the lumbar lordosis at around 9 months of age. The intercristal line of the neonate is at the level of L4–L5, whereas it is positioned at L3–L4 in adults. The axis of the coccyx changes as children grow, making caudal analgesia more difficult in children older than 7 to 8 years of age. As ossification continues during development, ultrasound visualization of the spine becomes more challenging. Visualization of the structures is more difficult in children 10 years of age or older ( ).

The spinous processes in young children are more parallel and horizontal, thus facilitating a midline approach to the epidural space. The largest intervertebral space is usually at the level of T12–L1. The CSF volume per weight (kg) in infants is higher compared with adults and older children, which may explain why infants require more local anesthetic for a spinal block. The nerves in neonates and young infants are thinner and not fully myelinated until the second year of life, which allows a lower concentration of local anesthetic to be effective.

Most neuraxial techniques in children are performed under general anesthesia. In adults, concern has been raised about the safety of performing regional procedures on unconscious patients incapable of reporting paresthesia ( ). In children, however, most agree that the risk associated with needle placement in uncooperative patients who, due to cognitive immaturity, are incapable of reporting paresthesia outweighs any purported benefits. Safety data from large multicenter studies support the practice of placing neuraxial blocks in anesthetized children ( ).

Caudal

Traditional landmark-based technique

After induction of general anesthesia, the patient is positioned in left or right lateral decubitus position with knees and hips flexed. When performing the block in awake neonates, prone positioning may be preferred. Sterile preparation of the skin with chlorhexidine is preferred, taking care to swab in a cranial to caudal direction. Sterile technique should be maintained throughout the procedure, as with any neuraxial technique.

The posterior superior iliac spines (PSIS) and sacral hiatus are palpated ( Fig. 24.6 ). An equilateral triangle with the line between the two PSIS as its base will have the sacral hiatus at its apex. The line between the PSIS is at S1–S2, the level of the termination of the dural sac, giving the proceduralist a general idea of the limit of needle insertion before dural puncture is likely.

Fig. 24.6, Dermatomal Distribution of Local Anesthetic for a Single-Shot Caudal Block.

The sacral hiatus is located just cephalad to the gluteal cleft and the coccyx. It is formed from the nonunion of the S5 vertebral arch. The bony protuberances of the sacral cornu can be palpated on either side of the sacral hiatus. With the nondominant gloved hand, the sacral hiatus is palpated, and with the dominant gloved hand, a needle is inserted in the midline between the sacral cornu, at a 45- to 60-degree angle with the skin. As the needle passes through the sacrococcygeal ligament, a characteristic “pop” or loss of resistance to needle insertion can be appreciated. After passing through the sacrococcygeal membrane, the needle angle is typically reduced to 30 degrees with the skin, and the needle is advanced no further than 5 mm to avoid puncturing the dural sac or a blood vessel ( Fig. 24.7 ).

Fig. 24.7, Caudal Landmarks (Equilateral Triangle Formed by Posterior Superior Iliac Spines and Sacral Hiatus).

Commonly employed needles are 22 G B-bevel caudal needle, 20 or 22 G intravenous (IV) catheters, and 23 G butterfly needles ( ). If an IV catheter is used, it can be threaded off the needle into the caudal epidural space.

For single-shot caudal blocks, dosing with 1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine will reliably result in a block to the level of the umbilicus. If just sacral dermatomes require coverage, then a reduced dose of 0.5 mL/kg will suffice ( Fig. 24.8 ). Ropivacaine 0.2% has largely supplanted bupivacaine 0.25% as the most widely used local anesthetic and provides reliable analgesia for 4 to 8 hours when used without adjuncts. The local anesthetic should be injected incrementally, interrupted with frequent aspiration, to assess for unintentional intravascular, intraosseous, or intrathecal injection. Palpation for induration just cephalad to the point of injection should be performed during and after injection to assess for unintentional subcutaneous or subdermal injection of local anesthetic. Continuous pulse oximetry and ECG, with frequent blood pressure checks, should be performed.

Fig. 24.8, Caudal Block Technique Using a 23 G Butterfly Needle.

Caudal block confirmatory testing

In 1992, Lewis and colleagues described a technique of injecting 2 mL of air into the caudal space of adults, resulting in a characteristic “whoosh” sound auscultated over the thoracolumbar spine using a stethoscope. They standardized the “whoosh test” against epidurogram and found no false positives. This confirmatory test for caudal injection was later applied to pediatrics. reported the case of a probable venous air embolism in a 26-month-old, 11-kg boy after “a small volume of air” was injected as part of confirmatory testing while performing a caudal block. The “swoosh test” then emerged as a modification of the original whoosh test, wherein the injection of air was avoided by performing auscultation over the lumbar spine during injection of local anesthetic into the caudal space. found the swoosh test to be as effective a clinical predictor as the whoosh test. The use of real-time ultrasound guidance for caudal block (see later) has also emerged as a confirmatory testing technique, as needle entry and local anesthetic spread within the caudal space can be visualized in real time.

Epinephrine test dose

The epinephrine test dose adds safety to the procedure in ruling out (or in) an intravascular injection. Because the majority of pediatric patients are under general anesthesia when the block is performed, detection of intrathecal injection with a test dose of lidocaine is less useful. Achieving the recommended test dose of 0.5 mcg/kg with standard epinephrine solutions available in most operating rooms can be difficult for the busy anesthesia provider and can risk drug errors and potentially be a source of contamination for sterile epidural solutions. It is preferable to use prepared epidural test dose solutions (i.e., 1.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine) for this purpose.

Ultrasound-guided technique

Ultrasound guidance has emerged as a technique to more accurately identify the sacral hiatus than the traditional landmark technique and can confirm local anesthetic injection into the caudal epidural space ( Fig. 24.9 A–D). One of the most common complications of the caudal block is block failure ( ), leading to inadequate analgesia. Ultrasound for the caudal block has the disadvantage of increased cost, both in terms of increased time to perform the procedure and in the cost of the ultrasound machine and sterile probe covers required. Ultrasound is most effective with children under 6 months to 1 year of age because of incomplete ossification of bony structures improving beam penetration. But the technique has also been used to increase success of caudal blocks in older children. demonstrated a 90% success rate in U.S.-guided caudal blocks in children and adolescents weighing 30 to 50 kg. The use of ultrasound guidance has increased the success rate of caudal blocks, even with experienced practitioners ( ; ).

Fig. 24.9, Ultrasound Images of Caudal Space.

In short axis, the sacral cornu are identified as two inverted U-shaped structures on either side of the sacral hiatus—the characteristic “frog eyes” sign (see Fig. 24.9 A). The sacrococcygeal ligament will appear between the cornu as a hyperechoic band, with a deeper hyperechoic band beneath it that has an associated bone shadow. The latter represents the dorsal surface of the sacral canal. A needle is advanced using out-of-plane technique between the sacral cornu and through the sacrococcygeal ligament. Once the needle passes through the sacrococcygeal ligament, the probe can be turned 90 degrees to visualize the needle in-plane as it is inserted into the sacral canal ( Fig. 24.10 ). As local anesthetic is injected, an expanding hypoechogenic mass will be seen within the sacral canal, with associated dural movement within the space. Visualization of the needle within the sacral canal or spread of local anesthetic within the canal confirms successful block placement.

Fig. 24.10, Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Block.

Thoracic and lumbar epidural

Appropriate placement of the epidural catheter in terms of dermatomal level is essential because of the relatively low volumes of local anesthetics used in neonates and infants. This requires communication with the surgeon to identify the precise location of surgical incisions. For example, in a 2 kg neonate with maximum hourly dose of 0.25 mg/kg for ropivacaine, the hourly ropivacaine dose would be just 0.5 mg/hr. Even when using ropivacaine 0.1% (1 mg/mL), this represents a volume of 0.5 mL delivered to the epidural space per hour. Without the ability of being able to “top up” an imprecisely placed epidural catheter to cover the surgical incision, care and planning are essential when placing these catheters in small pediatric patients.

Technique

Anesthetized children are placed in lateral position with hips and knees flexed, and the spine kyphotic ( Fig. 24.11 ). Older children and adolescents may have epidurals placed in sitting position while lightly sedated. The skin is sterilized with chlorhexidine and draped. Sterile technique must be maintained throughout the procedure. A midline approach is generally employed in prepubescent children.

Fig. 24.11, Epidural Placement in a Child.

A 5 cm 20 G Touhy needle with a 24 G epidural catheter is generally used for patients under 12 months of age. A 5 cm or 9 cm 18 G Touhy needle with a 20 G epidural catheter can generally be used for patients over 12 months of age. Loss of resistance (LOR) is the most commonly used technique for identifying the epidural space. Air or saline have been well described as LOR media, although saline is probably the preferred medium for most pediatric practitioners. Proponents of air argue that it is a more sensitive medium than saline, which can be beneficial in infants who have less fibrous ligamentum flava than older children and adults. If air is used, small volumes (<1 mL) are recommended to avoid air venous embolism, and the introduction of air bubbles into the epidural space. The use of air versus saline remains controversial.

In neonates and infants, intermittent advancement of the needle, alternating with syringe pressure, provides good needle control. Continuous needle advancement with steady syringe pressure has been safely employed with older children. The estimated depth formula proposed by of 1 mm/kg for thoracolumbar epidural space in children 6 months to 10 years of age remains a useful guide.

Once the epidural space is identified with LOR, it is further confirmed by ease of catheter placement into the epidural space. The catheter should thread into the space with little resistance. The epidural catheter should be advanced to a depth such that the tip is located in proximity to the spinal interspace corresponding to the dermatomal level of surgical incision, regardless of whether a single or multiorifice catheter is used.

Leakage of epidural infusate from the catheter insertion site is a common problem in small pediatric patients for a number of reasons. The skin-to-epidural space distance is relatively short, as children have less subcutaneous tissue than adults. The pediatric ligamentum flavum is a less resilient barrier than it is in adults. Finally, the catheter is always of a smaller gauge than the needle through which it was inserted, leaving space around the catheter for fluid to leak out. With leakage, less medication is delivered to the site. Leakage can also compromise dressing integrity and therefore catheter sterility in the postoperative period. This can necessitate the catheter being discontinued prematurely. Acryl skin adhesives (e.g., Dermabond, Ethicon, Inc., Sommerville, NJ) applied at the insertion site can reduce the risk of catheter leakage. Inserting the catheter at least two interspaces below the target dermatomal level and threading the catheter cephalad such that at least 3 to 4 cm of the catheter is inserted into the epidural space will further reduce the risk of leakage.

Point-of-care ultrasound can be used before the procedure to identify the patient’s midline, find the target interspace, and measure the depth from skin to epidural space. In small children ultrasound may be used to identify catheter tip position and confirm local anesthetic spread in the epidural space. Other methods, including radiographic ( ), nerve stimulation ( ), and ECG guidance ( ), have been described to confirm epidural catheter placement. These confirmatory techniques are becoming much less common with the advent of ultrasound.

Caudal catheters

In infants and neonates, a useful technique for placing lumbar and thoracic epidural catheters is via a caudal insertion site. The caudal approach was first developed by Bosenberg and colleagues in 1988 as an alternative to avoid the technical difficulty and potential for harm of direct thoracic or lumbar epidural catheter placement in neonates and infants. Caudal epidural catheters threaded to the lumbar or thoracic level are a well-established technique with low risk of dural puncture or spinal cord trauma.

The two major areas of concern with the caudal catheter technique are risk of contamination and verification of catheter placement. The proximity of the caudal insertion site to the patient’s anus presents a source of potential infection and thus may limit the catheter’s duration in the postoperative period as the patient’s bowel function returns. in the UK pediatric epidural audit found that caudally inserted epidural catheters were not associated with a higher rate of infection compared with those inserted at the lumbar or thoracic levels. prospectively compared the rates of catheter contamination between caudal and lumbar inserted catheters by aseptically removing and culturing catheter tips. There were no serious epidural catheter infections reported in either group. Gram-positive colonization was similar in the caudal (25%) and lumbar (23%) catheters, but gram-negative organisms colonized 16% of caudal catheters and just 3% of lumbar catheters. Tunneling the epidural catheter under the skin, away from the caudal insertion site, is an effective technique for reducing the risk of contamination. found that tunneled caudal catheters had a similar bacterial colonization rate (11%) to nontunneled lumbar catheters (9%), which was less than half the colonization rate of nontunneled caudal catheters (29%).

Technique

After induction of anesthesia and securing the airway, the patient is placed in the prone position, with the head turned to the side. As part of positioning, it is essential to ensure the infant’s back is straight as viewed from the long and short axis. Any curvature of the spine, especially lumbar lordosis, will interfere with catheter advancement. Bony landmarks, including the sacral hiatus and the interspace of the surgical dermatomal level, are identified and marked. The patient’s back and sacrum are prepared with chlorhexidine and sterilely draped. The distance from caudal space to the desired interspace should be measured, and the catheter advanced the corresponding distance. An 18 G Touhy needle (alternately an angiocatheter) is inserted into the caudal space, preferably under ultrasound guidance. After injection of a small volume of saline, 0.5 to 1 mL, the epidural catheter is threaded through the Touhy needle until the premeasured distance is reached. Resistance to catheter advancement should be low, as in other techniques for epidural catheter placement. Resistance to advancement may indicate coiling of the catheter or misdirection. Confirmation of the catheter tip at the desired interspace can be accomplished with ultrasound visualization of the catheter itself or spread of hypoechoic fluid (saline or test dose solution) in the epidural space and displacement of the thecal sac downward in the spinal canal. The use of a stimulating catheter inserted caudally and advanced while observing segmental muscle stimulation has also been described ( ). Radiographic ( ), and even ECG confirmation ( ), have also been used. found that 3% of caudally threaded epidural catheters from the PRAN database could not be placed.

Epidural catheter dosing

The initial loading dose of a pediatric epidural catheter should be weight based: 0.5 mL/kg for lumbar epidural, 0.3 mL/kg for thoracic epidural, and 0.25 mL/kg for subsequent “top-up” maintenance dosing in the absence of a continuous infusion ( ). Infusions are typically maintained with 0.2% ropivacaine rather than bupivacaine because of the former’s more favorable therapeutic index. For neonates, 0.1% ropivacaine can be used for a wider dermatomal spread. Postoperatively, epidural infusions can be safely continued for 48 to 72 hours without unbound ropivacaine concentrations reaching levels known to cause central nervous system toxicity in adults. Maximum infusion rates of ropivacaine vary by patient age:

  • <3 months 0.2 mg/kg/hr

  • 3 to 6 months 0.3 to 0.4 mg/kg/hr

  • >6 months 0.4 to 0.5 mg/kg/hr

Clonidine may be added (0.1 mcg/kg/hr) ( ) for children >10 kg body weight.

Spinal

Patients can be positioned lateral or sitting. The sitting position has the advantages of ease of finding midline, and the increased hydrostatic pressure providing more brisk cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) return from the spinal needle. Although the dura itself is insensate and dural puncture can be performed in awake children without excessive discomfort, it is generally recommended to topicalize the skin prior to needle insertion. An assistant should firmly grasp an awake infant and will need to support the neck and maintain the airway of a sitting neonate (see Fig. 24.12 ). Typically, 25 G to 27 G spinal needles are used for infants and neonates and are available in lengths as short as 1 inch; 22 G spinal needles can be used in older children. Tuffier’s line will correspond to the L4–L5 vertebral level in neonates and infants and below the conus medullaris in all age groups. Preprocedural ultrasound exam, when available, should be used to estimate the depth for dural puncture and reassure the provider that the intended lumbar interspace is below cord structures. Once the intended interspace is identified and skin sterilely prepped, the spinal needle should be inserted midline. In neonates the loss of resistance as the needle punctures the dura is particularly subtle. After return of CSF from the end of the spinal needle, the medication syringe is attached, and the dose of local anesthetic is injected. Attaching an electrocautery grounding pad to the infant’s back or sacrum, as is commonly practiced, should be done at this point. After injection the infant should be returned to supine position. Lifting of the infant’s legs or Trendelenburg positioning should be avoided at this point to prevent high spinal spread of local anesthetic.

Fig. 24.12, Awake Spinal in an Infant.

Dosing

Bupivacaine or ropivacaine (isobaric preparations, 0.5%) can be used at a dose of 0.5 to 1 mg/kg, with higher dosing in infants and neonates (see Box 24.5 ). This dose will provide 60 to 80 minutes of surgical anesthesia below the level of the umbilicus. A motor block in the lower extremities should be apparent within 5 to 10 minutes, as the baby should cease to move her legs spontaneously. A failed spinal will be apparent by continued vigorous bilateral leg movements, or withdrawal of the legs to pinching, after 10 minutes. Even with a successful block the infant may require oral soothing intraoperatively, with a pacifier dipped in an oral glucose solution.

BOX 24.5
Spinal Anesthetic Dosing

  • 0.5–1 mg/kg 0.5% bupivacaine (0.2 mL/kg, max volume 1 mL)

  • Additive (optional): Clonidine 1 mcg/kg

Complications

Complications during spinal anesthesia in children are uncommon. In the ADARPEF study, an intravascular injection during spinal anesthesia was the only reported complication in 506 cases ( ). Although considered to be a rare occurrence in children, the incidence of postdural puncture headache is actually between 10% and 50% in children 10 to 18 years of age ( ; ). Although the incidence of PDPH is less in children younger than 8 years old compared with adults, it appears to be more common in teenagers (12 to 18 years) than adults. In one observational study, the incidence was threefold higher in teenagers (4.9%) than adults (1.8%) ( ). The onset of symptoms from a postdural puncture headache typically occurs within 48 hours, with the hallmark symptom being a frontal or occipital headache that is postural. The cause of postdural puncture headache is most likely a persistent leakage of spinal fluid that causes a net decrease in CSF volume and intracranial pressure. The supine position helps to alleviate the symptoms by decreasing the effect of gravity on the CSF leak. The size of the dural perforation is the primary predictor of the development of postdural puncture headache. To reduce the risk for postdural puncture headache, smaller-gauge needles are used, and the needle is inserted with the bevel parallel to the dura’s longitudinal fibers ( ). Electron microscopy has revealed that the collagen fibers of the dura are arranged in several layers and that the thickness of the dura is more predictive of whether a leak will occur than the orientation of the needle’s bevel ( ). This explains the unpredictability of postdural puncture headache.

If a diagnosis of postdural puncture headache is made, simple measures such as bed rest and hydration can decrease the volume of CSF loss. In addition, analgesics to reduce the headache and intravenous caffeine may be administered. Caffeine is effective because of its ability to cause cerebrovascular vasoconstriction, resulting in decreased cerebral blood flow. In one study, when caffeine was used prophylactically in adults, visual analog pain scores and analgesic demand after postdural puncture headache were lower ( ). The oral dosage for adult patients is 300 to 500 mg once or twice a day ( ). Pediatric patients can be administered 10 mg/kg oral caffeine divided twice daily ( ). The intravenous formulation of caffeine is administered with sodium benzoate. The pediatric dose is 10 mg/kg, with a max dose equal to the adult intravenous dose of 500 mg. This may be repeated within 2 to 4 hours if the headache is unchanged after the first dose ( ).

If conservative measures to treat postdural puncture headache are ineffective after 24 to 48 hours, an epidural blood patch should be considered. This requires that blood be drawn sterilely from a peripheral vein. The blood is then injected into the epidural space under aseptic technique. An epidural blood patch is most effective 48 to 72 hours after the dural puncture, and it may be ineffective if performed immediately after dural tap because high leakage of CSF may interfere with blood clotting ( ). If a child is awake during the placement of an epidural blood patch, the clinician should stop the injection once the child feels either discomfort or pressure in the back. If a child is anesthetized during the performance of an epidural blood patch, no more than 0.3 mL/kg of blood should be injected into the epidural space ( ).

Total spinal block with respiratory arrest and bradycardia is another complication of spinal anesthesia ( ). The preganglionic sympathetic blockade that is commonly seen in adults secondary to a high spinal is not typically seen in children, particularly in infants ( ; ; ). Dohi and colleagues were the first to describe the lack of hemodynamic changes after spinal block–induced sympathetic blockade in children. They found that children younger than 5 years of age had little or no hemodynamic response to a T3-level tetracaine spinal anesthetic, whereas children older than 8 years of age had cardiovascular responses that were more similar to those of adults. The mechanism for this lack of hemodynamic sympathectomy was postulated to be the immaturity of the sympathetic nervous system and differences in CSF volume and spinal cord surface area. In addition, it is also possible that the smaller blood volume that is present in the lower extremities of a young child compared with that of an adolescent or adult may account for less venous pooling and therefore less hemodynamic change ( ; ). Despite the typical lack of cardiovascular compromise, neonates occasionally require ventilatory support or pharmacologic intervention because of a high spinal anesthesia with a resulting blockade of the cardiac accelerator fibers or a decrease in stimulation of the right atrial stretch receptors ( ). Investigation has shown that even former premature infants in the absence of fluid loading tolerate high spinal anesthesia with minimal autonomic changes ( ).

Head and neck blocks

Numerous surgical procedures in children involve the head and neck and lend themselves to the use of regional anesthesia. Generally, these blocks are simple to perform, require minimal equipment, and involve terminal sensory branches; consequently, motor block is often not a concern, and the risk for nerve injury is small ( ). Small volumes of local anesthetic and fine needles are used. Success and safety in regional anesthesia always depends on sound anatomic knowledge ( ). This is certainly true when performing head and neck blocks, as ultrasound guidance or nerve stimulation are often not helpful in identifying accurate needle placement. However, emerging technologies, such as high-frequency microultrasound, will influence and affect the way head and neck blocks are performed in the future ( ).

Supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve blocks

Surgical procedures for which these blocks may be performed include frontal craniotomy, ventriculoperitoneal shunt or Ommaya shunt placement, and dermoid cyst excision.

Anatomy

Innervating the scalp, forehead, and upper eyelid, these two nerves are terminal branches of the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve, which exits the cranium through the superior orbital fissure and then divides into three branches: lacrimal, frontal, and nasociliary. The frontal branch further divides to form the supraorbital and supratrochlear nerves, which emerge through their respective notches on the orbital roof.

Dermatome distribution

These nerves innervate the frontal scalp, forehead, median portion of the upper eyelid, and the bridge of the nose.

Affected muscle group

These are purely sensory nerves with no muscle innervation.

Landmark technique

The child lies supine with his or her head in a neutral position. The ipsilateral eye should be covered with an impermeable dressing to prevent chemical injury during skin preparation. In the midline, identify, by palpation, the supraorbital foramen in the roof of the orbital rim. After chlorhexidine preparation, advance a 27- to 30-gauge needle until bony contact is made, and then withdraw 1 mm. After negative aspiration, inject local anesthetic, then massage gently and apply firm pressure to prevent hematoma formation ( Fig. 24.13 ).

Fig. 24.13, Supraorbital and Supratrochlear Nerve Blocks.

Ultrasound technique

Ultrasound technique has not been described.

Dosing

Administer 1 to 2 mL 0.2% to 0.5% ropivacaine (per side).

Complications

Intravascular injection and hematoma formation are possible. Orbital injury would be a rare and entirely avoidable complication arising from lack of attention to careful technique.

Infraorbital nerve block

Surgical procedures for which these blocks may be performed include cleft lip surgery, endoscopic sinus surgery, and rhinoplasty. Bilateral infraorbital nerve blocks have demonstrated analgesic superiority and reduced time to wakening without negative consequence on time to feeding or volume of feeding compared with intravenous fentanyl ( ; ).

Anatomy

The maxillary branch of the trigeminal nerve becomes the infraorbital nerve once it exits the skull via the infraorbital fossa just inferior to the infraorbital rim and deep to the levator labii superioris. It then divides into terminal sensory branches.

Dermatome distribution

This nerve innervates the lower eyelid and upper lip, teeth and gums, nasal mucosa, and the palate and roof of the mouth.

Affected muscle group

This is a purely sensory nerve with no muscle innervation.

Landmark technique

There are two approaches described: an extraoral and an intraoral approach. For both techniques, the child lies supine with the head in a neutral position.

Extraoral approach.

In the midline (inferior to the pupil), identify, by palpation, the infraorbital foramen in the floor of the orbital rim. After chlorhexidine preparation, advance a 27- to 30-gauge needle until bony contact is made, and then withdraw 1 mm. After negative aspiration, inject local anesthetic, then massage gently and apply firm pressure to prevent hematoma formation.

Intraoral approach.

This is the preferred technique, as the risk for visible skin bruising is reduced. In the midline, palpate the infraorbital foramen in floor of orbital rim. Place a finger over the foramen to prevent needle injury to the orbit. Evert the upper lip, then insert a 27- to 30-gauge needle at the level of first premolar and advance toward the foramen. After negative aspiration, inject local anesthetic, then massage gently and apply firm pressure to prevent hematoma formation ( Fig. 24.14 ).

Fig. 24.14, Infraorbital Nerve Block.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here