Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Advances in radiation have led to a significant increase in its use for diagnostic, interventional, and therapeutic purposes. With the ever-increasing utilization of endovascular techniques, concern has grown regarding the potential harmful effects of radiation delivered to both the patient and the operator. Although radiation exposure from diagnostic procedures is generally low and comparable to natural background doses, therapeutic use of radiation during endovascular procedures involves a higher level of exposure, which can be harmful if not controlled. Surgeon education on appropriate use of fluoroscopic equipment, shielding, and protection has been shown to be beneficial in decreasing radiation exposure.
Radiation poses risk to workers and patients alike. Many medical specialists operate medical X-ray equipment frequently. Operating room assistants are often not properly educated regarding the potential damaging effects of radiation and may receive little training on how to minimize exposure to themselves or to the patient. Patients may undergo procedures without being properly informed of the risks. These deficiencies can result in unnecessary exposure for both patients and staff.
The concern about radiation exposure is particularly pressing in the field of vascular surgery, where endovascular procedures are mainstays of clinical practice. Percutaneous angioplasty and stenting of peripheral and carotid arteries, as well as endovascular stent-grafts for treating abdominal and thoracic aortic diseases are now first-line treatment options. Advanced techniques such as fenestrated and branched endografts for complex thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair may carry significant radiation exposure to surgeons and their patients due to the steep gantry angles, long procedural time and use of magnification. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) as a primary modality of investigation and follow-up has become widely accepted in the management of atherosclerotic vascular disease as has coronary CT for the purposes of coronary artery calcium scoring. Given the incidence of coronary disease in the vascular surgery patient population, the potential exists for significant radiation exposure over the patient’s lifetime.
The principles of radiation safety have been well addressed by a number of national bodies – the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). These organizations provide valuable resources and publications that disseminate information and recommendations about radiation exposure and protection. Additionally, each state has its own regulations regarding radiation safety and annual certification that the endovascular specialist should be aware of. This chapter serves to familiarize vascular surgeons with radiation terminology, dosing metrics, radiation-induced injury, and techniques to lower radiation dose to both the patient and the healthcare team.
Radiation is a form of energy emitted as electromagnetic waves or particles. It can be classified as nonionizing (ultrasound, magnetic resonance, laser, microwaves) or ionizing (X-rays, gamma rays). Nonionizing radiation does not possess the energy to ionize atoms of the absorbing matter. Ionizing radiation consists of alpha and beta particles, neutrons, and energetic photons (ultraviolet and above), which contain sufficiently high energy to interact with atoms and produce biologic injury. The most common forms of ionizing radiation used in medicine are X-rays, gamma rays, beta rays, and electrons.
The amount of ionization that radiation produces in air, measured in roentgens (R), does not accurately reflect its potential to cause biologic injury. Importantly, the actual damage or biologic effect of radiation depends upon the total energy of radiation absorbed per unit mass, the sensitivity of the organ, and the strength of the radiation. To quantify radiation for the purposes of risk assessment and setting standards and limits, the terms absorbed dose , equivalent dose , and effective dose are commonly used ( Table 26.1 ).
Measurement | Unit | Measures | |
---|---|---|---|
Radioactivity | Curie | Number of particles/s from 1 g of radium | |
Ionizing radiation | Roentgen (R) | Charge/unit mass | 1 R = 2.58 × 10 −4 C/kg |
Absorbed dose | Rad | 1 rad = 0.01 J/kg | 1 rad = 0.01 Gy |
Gray (Gy) | 1 Gy = 1 J/kg | 1 Gy = 100 rad | |
Equivalent dose/effective dose | Rem | Rem = rad × W | 1 rem = 0.01 Sv |
Sievert (Sv) | Sv = Gy × W | 1 Sv = 100 rem |
The absorbed dose is a measure of the amount of energy deposited in a medium by ionizing radiation per unit mass of matter and is equal to the amount of heat generated by the radiation per tissue weight in a specified material. The International System of Units (SI) measure for absorbed dose is the gray (Gy), named after Louis Harold Gray, a British physicist. One gray equals 1 joule (J) of energy absorbed per kilogram (J/kg). Historically, the unit most commonly used was the radiation absorbed dose (rad); 1 Gy = 100 rad. The absorbed dose is not an accurate indicator of biologic effect given that different types of ionizing radiation produce different degrees of tissue damage.
The equivalent dose, a measure of the radiation dose to tissue, takes into account the different degrees of damage by different types of radiation by introducing a radiation weighting factor (W R ). The SI unit of equivalent dose is the sievert (Sv), named after Rolf Sievert, a Swedish physicist. Thus, equivalent dose = absorbed dose × W R . Another unit, the roentgen equivalent man, or rem, is still sometimes used; 1 Sv = 100 rem.
W R is calculated based on the type of radiation, using 1 for X-rays and gamma rays and 3–10 for protons and neutrons. The sievert better describes the biologic effect of radiation and is commonly used when risk from ionizing radiation is assessed. It also allows quantification of risk and comparison to other commonly encountered modes of exposure. For fluoroscopic interventions in vascular surgery, the sievert and gray are roughly equal; absorbed dose = equivalent dose.
Different tissues and organs have different sensitivity to radiation, therefore the concept of effective dose is introduced to take into account the part of the body irradiated and the volume and time over which the radiation dose is applied. The effective dose, measured in sieverts, is calculated by weighting the equivalent dose by a tissue weighting factor (W T ). This calculation takes into consideration the distribution of radiation as well as the radiosensitivity of various organs or tissues. To avoid confusion, W R and W T are sometimes grouped together into one single weighting factor (W).
Effective dose may be evaluated prospectively for planning and optimization of radiation protection, as well as retrospectively for assessment of the radiation-associated risk incurred. It is mainly used as a protective and regulatory quantity and not for epidemiologic study of populations. It does not provide a precise indicator of an individual patient’s risk, as there is no consideration of patient age, gender, or other confounding factors.
Because grays and sieverts quantify relatively large amounts of radiation, in medical use, radiation is typically described using milligrays (mGy) or millisieverts (mSv).
Ionizing radiation damages living cells, which can then repair themselves, die, or undergo mutation. The effects of radiation on biologic tissue are generally classified as two types: deterministic effects and stochastic effects.
Deterministic effects of radiation are dose-dependent and result in cell death, impacting hair follicles, skin, subcutaneous tissues, and the lens of the eye. These acute events occur when a threshold level of radiation has been exceeded, and the higher the dose, the greater the injury ( Fig. 26.1 ). The threshold is not absolute and can vary among individuals. Table 26.2 shows some threshold levels of human organs with corresponding deterministic effects. Doses required to produce deterministic effects are often large and exceed 1 to 2 Sv. Symptoms arise when a significant proportion of cells are killed by radiation, and subsequent inflammation or fibrosis may produce additional damage to the organ. Examples of deterministic effects include radiation-induced dermatitis, cataracts, infertility, and organ atrophy or fibrosis ( Figs. 26.2 and 26.3 ). Given increasing concerns about the late manifestation of cataracts from low doses of ionizing radiation, the recommended threshold of the lens is 0.5 Sv.
Organ | Effects | THRESHOLD EFFECTIVE DOSE (Sv) | |
---|---|---|---|
Single Dose | Multiple Yearly Doses | ||
Gonads | Temporary sterility | 0.1 | 0.4 |
Permanent sterility | 3–6 | 2 | |
Eye | Cataracts | 0.5 | 0.2 |
Bone marrow | Marrow depression | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Skin | Transient erythema | 2 | — |
Desquamation | 2–10 | — | |
Temporary hair loss | 4 | — | |
Dermal necrosis | 25 | — | |
Skin atrophy | 10 | 1 | |
Whole body | Acute radiation sickness | 1 | — |
Whole-body exposure to 10- to 20-Gy of high-energy radiation, delivered at one time, can be fatal to humans. For acute whole-body equivalent doses, 0.5 to 1Sv may produce light radiation sickness; 1 Sv causes slight blood changes; and 2 to 3 Sv causes nausea, hair loss, and hemorrhage. An acute dose of 3 Sv causes death in 50% of individuals within 30 days, and with doses higher than 6 Sv, survival is unlikely.
Stochastic, or probabilistic, effects of radiation cause DNA damage to single cells, which results in mutation. This is an all-or-none phenomenon, with the probability of occurrence increasing as the cumulative radiation exposure increases without an established threshold level ( Fig. 26.4 ). The severity of the effect of mutation is unrelated to the dose. Mutations may lead to cancer and heritable genetic defects. Theoretically, stochastic effects can occur even at low doses, but it is assumed that with radiation doses of less than 100mSv/year, the probability of stochastic effects is very low. At such low doses, it is assumed that the probability of incurring cancer or heritable effects will be directly proportional to the equivalent dose. This is known as the linear-nonthreshold model of incremental risk.
Leukemia and other cancers have been shown to be associated with radiation exposure. It is estimated that the probability of fatal cancer developing as a result of radiation exposure is 4% per 1Sv of lifetime dose equivalent (or 0.004% per mSv). For reference, the background risk of spontaneous fatal cancer is approximately 20%. The nominal nonfatal cancer risk has been estimated at 0.8% per sievert. Radiation-induced cancer risks from relatively low-dose exposure are difficult to estimate. A statistically significant increase in cancer risk has not been demonstrated in populations exposed to doses of less than 100 mSv. Studies of atomic bomb survivors showed an increased incidence of leukemia and other tumors of the lung, thyroid, breast, skin, and gastrointestinal tract. There is usually a latent period of 2 to 5 years for the leukemia, 5 years for thyroid cancer, and 10 or more years for other cancers to manifest. The risk of radiation-induced malignancy with prenatal exposure or for children and adolescents is slightly higher than that seen in adults by a factor of 2 to 3. Fetal effects are discussed in the “Radiation and Pregnancy” section, later in this chapter.
Hereditary effects from radiation exposure have not been observed in humans in studies of the offspring of atomic bomb survivors. Based on extrapolation from animal studies, the ICRP proposed a nominal risk of heritable effects of 0.1% per sievert.
We are constantly exposed to radiation through naturally occurring radioactive materials, as well as by cosmic radiation and human activities. The average annual natural background radiation, which varies depending on the geographic location, is around 3mSv/year in the continental United States. Living at higher altitude is associated with a higher dose. The greatest source of domestic radiation is radon gas (about 2mSv/year). Radon arises from the decay of radium; it seeps out of the soil and may concentrate in poorly ventilated concrete homes because of its high density. Radon is the second most frequent cause of lung cancer after cigarette smoking. Other manmade radiation sources include building materials, fuel, televisions, smoke detectors, and various fluorescent devices.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here