Myocardial Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Advanced Techniques


The physiologic basis for and the general principles of myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) are covered in detail in other chapters. The key challenge of first-pass dynamic contrast-enhanced acquisition is to capture data with high temporal and spatial resolution during the myocardial contrast passage. The recommended minimal requirements for standard perfusion CMR are to acquire data in three short-axis sections of the heart according to criteria defined by the American Heart Association (AHA) at every R-R interval and with an in-plane spatial resolution of at least 3 × 3 mm. These requirements are most commonly met with saturation recovery fast gradient echo pulse sequences combined with spatial undersampling methods or echo planar imaging to accelerate data acquisition by 2- to 3-fold. The standardized CMR protocols 2013 update by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) recommends a basic technique for perfusion CMR ( Table 5.1 ).

TABLE 5.1
Basic Perfusion CMR Technique
Pulse sequence Saturation recovery imaging with readout:

  • Spoiled GRE

  • GRE-echo planar hybrid

  • Steady-state free precession

Acceleration method Parallel imaging, if available
Temporal resolution Every heartbeat (for ischemia detection)
Readout temporal resolution (= acquisition shot duration) ~100–125 ms or shorter as available
No. of dynamics Image for 40–50 heartbeats, by which time contrast has passed through the LV myocardium
No. of slices At least 3 short-axis slices
In-plane spatial resolution <3 mm
Slice thickness 8 mm
Contrast agent dose and administration regime 0.05–0.1 mmol/kg (3–7 mL/s) followed by at least 30 mL saline flush (3–7 mL/s)
Breath-holding Breath-hold starts during early phases of contrast infusion before contrast reaches the LV cavity
CMR, Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; GRE, gradient echo; LV, left ventricular.

Advanced Techniques

The need for higher spatial and temporal resolution in dynamic CMR has prompted the development of several dedicated imaging speed-up techniques. Effects on signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and increasing artifacts limit the practically achievable acceleration to approximately 2- to 3-fold using standard acceleration techniques such as echo planar imaging or parallel imaging. However, data acquisition can be further accelerated with methods that exploit both temporal and spatial correlations capitalizing on significant spatiotemporal redundancy within imaging data, which is particularly relevant to first-pass perfusion imaging. Several of these approaches have been used to improve in-plane spatial resolution of myocardial perfusion CMR with reductions in dark rim artifact, better detection of subendocardial ischemia, and possible improvement in diagnostic accuracy versus standard resolution acquisition ( Figs. 5.1 and 5.2 ). Others have used the speed-up to increase spatial coverage through acquisition of more than 3 slices or even whole-heart three-dimensional (3D) acquisition, which allows more reliable calculation of the total myocardial ischemic burden (MIB), akin to nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) ( Fig. 5.3 ). An additional benefit of 3D perfusion CMR is that it allows the acquisition of all slices at the same time point in the cardiac cycle—for example, in mid-diastole or end-systole—so that motion artifacts can be reduced and registration between slices improved.

FIG. 5.1, High-resolution perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Standard (A–C) and high-resolution (D–F) stress perfusion CMR in a patient with three-vessel coronary artery disease. Standard resolution shows perfusion defects (arrows) in the basal-inferior (A), mid-inferior, mid-inferoseptal (B), apical-anterior and apical-inferior segments (C). High resolution shows a similar distribution of perfusion defects but demonstrates additional ischemia in the basal-lateral (D), mid-anterior and mid-anterolateral segments (E) with a circumferential defect in the apical slice (F). Perfusion defects are also better delineated at high resolution and the transmural extent of ischemia more clearly seen.

FIG. 5.2, Dark rim artifact. (A) Dark rim artifact (DRA) (arrows) is a frequent finding in standard-resolution perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and relates to several factors, including cardiac motion, Gibb's ringing, susceptibility and partial volume cancellation between the myocardium and blood pool. Although DRAs may mimic perfusion defects, they can be distinguished by characteristic features: they occur at the arrival of contrast in the left ventricular cavity and before its arrival in the myocardium (Frame 1); they tend to disappear within 8 to 10 frames (Frame 7); their location is usually typical for a particular pulse sequence; and their width roughly equates to the in-plane spatial resolution, which was 2.5 mm in this example (Frame 3). (B) A 60-year-old man with suspected angina underwent stress perfusion CMR at 1.5 T with both standard-resolution (2.5 mm in-plane) and high-resolution (1.5 mm in-plane) acquisition (8 × k-t BLAST). There was no perfusion defect seen with either acquisition but there was significant DRA on the standard-resolution images (arrows) . X-ray angiography confirmed normal coronary arteries.

FIG. 5.3, Three-dimensional (3D) perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). (A) Consecutive slices of a 3D perfusion CMR scan facilitated by k-t principal component analysis during adenosine stress in a patient with significant stenoses in the proximal right coronary artery and distal left anterior descending coronary artery. (B) Identical images illustrating volumetry of myocardial hypoenhancement using a signal intensity threshold of 2 standard deviations below remote myocardium (red areas) . The volume of myocardial hypoenhancement was 30.4% of total myocardium.

However, although both high-resolution and 3D whole-heart perfusion CMR methods have been shown to be feasible and to have high diagnostic accuracy, most clinical studies to date have had small sample sizes and were conducted in single centers. Furthermore, direct comparison between standard and advanced methods are largely lacking, so that it remains unclear whether their theoretical benefits translate into altered patient management. The more advanced acceleration methods that are needed for high-resolution and 3D perfusion CMR also have specific limitations and are not necessarily available outside of research institutions. This chapter gives a brief overview of the principles of advanced acceleration in perfusion CMR, and summarizes the current evidence for high spatial resolution and 3D whole-heart acquisitions.

Acceleration Methods

Most of the studies reporting high-resolution or 3D perfusion CMR have used techniques based on “prior-knowledge” to derive the required acceleration factors for data acquisition. Prior-knowledge methods are based on the observation that image datasets exhibit considerable correlation in space and time. Perfusion CMR datasets contain a high degree of temporal redundancy, because data are acquired at a single time point in the cardiac cycle using electrocardiogram (ECG)-gating and during breath-holding—this means that most of the image is static and the predominant change between neighboring time frames is related to the passage of contrast. This image redundancy can be taken advantage of by undersampling data in the time (t) domain as well as the more conventional undersampling in the spatial ( k -space) domain. With some of the acceleration schemes discussed later, data acquisition can be accelerated up to a factor of 10 times. This level of acceleration has been used to improve spatial resolution (high-resolution perfusion CMR), increase spatial coverage within a single acquisition shot (3D whole-heart perfusion CMR) or to achieve a mixture of both.

k-t Undersampling Techniques

The k-t broad linear acquisition speed-up technique ( k-t BLAST) is a prior-knowledge spatiotemporal (k-t) undersampling technique that has gained common use. In k-t BLAST, undersampling is applied along k -space and time, while a low spatial resolution image (“training data”) is obtained in an interleaved fashion during the acquisition. A non­aliased, full image series is then reconstructed using prior knowledge derived from the training data ( Fig. 5.4 ). The signal aliasing is resolved by an adaptive filtering process in which the aliased signal is distributed according to a low-resolution estimate of the signal covariance, as derived from the training images. A particular advantage of this approach is that it allows some overlapping of the aliased object, thereby permitting higher acceleration factors. However, the inherent temporal filtering reduces temporal fidelity, which can lead to reconstruction errors or limit the reduction in data acquisition actually achieved.

FIG. 5.4, k-t undersampling acceleration techniques. (A) In k-t broad linear speed-up technique (BLAST) and k-t sensitivity encoding (SENSE), data acquisition is accelerated by undersampling along the spatial encoding (k) and time (t) axes, which leads to an aliased image. (B) Low-resolution “training data” is also obtained to determine data correlations: that is, “prior-knowledge.” (C) Finally, a nonaliased full image series is reconstructed using a statistical model derived from the training data.

A further limitation of k-t BLAST is that the reconstruction problem is intrinsically underdetermined (i.e., there are fewer equations than unknowns), which is a reflection of its dependence on the estimated signal covariance from training data. One method of improving this is to incorporate sensitivity encoding information into the reconstruction—this is the k-t SENSE method. A further solution, which allows the use of higher acceleration factors, is to constrain the reconstruction using a standard data compression technique, called principal component analysis (PCA)—this is a commonly used mathematical algorithm that reduces highly dimensional datasets to lower dimensionality by extracting and exploiting relevant correlations within the data. The extension of k-t BLAST or k-t SENSE methods using PCA in the reconstruction is referred to as k-t PCA.

In the k-t PCA method, the adaptive filter used to remove aliasing is improved by applying PCA to the training data from which the filter is derived. Effectively, PCA is used to transform the images into a new mathematical domain of temporal “basis function” more suitable for reconstruction. The advantage of this new mathematical domain is that it is sparser, even in cases of nonperiodic motion such as respiration or misgating, and therefore the core perfusion data is contained within a few principal components and the rest can be discarded. This mathematical transformation process facilitates the easier separation of overlapping signals before they are converted back into images and accounts for the greater temporal fidelity and relative robustness of k-t PCA to motion.

Non-Cartesian Techniques

Alternative approaches to acceleration involve data acquisition along non-Cartesian patterns such as radial trajectories through the center of k -space ( Fig. 5.5 ). Spatial and temporal redundancy are exploited serially and the altered geometry of k -space coverage facilitates greater efficiency compared with conventional Cartesian techniques by collecting more data with each RF excitation. Non-Cartesian techniques can also be combined with parallel imaging techniques and hold potential for large gains in spatial–temporal resolution.

FIG. 5.5, Non-Cartesian trajectories. Examples of three potential alternate trajectories discussed in the text: (A) echo planar imaging demonstrated with an echo train length of 4; (B) a spiral trajectory with 4 interleaves; and (C) a radial projection design. Partition encoding direction in (B) and (C) is the same as for (A).

In the highly constrained back-projection reconstruction (HYPR) method and other radial acquisition variants, k -space data is acquired with undersampled radial projections and overall rotation of the undersampling pattern at different time points. In image reconstruction, a fully sampled composite image is formed by populating missing data from neighboring time frames. This very low temporal resolution composite is then used to constrain back projection of the undersampled data acquired for each individual time frame.

To date, perhaps because other approaches are already well established, radial imaging has not been widely applied to two-dimensional (2D) perfusion CMR, other than for specific research purposes such as multiple samples through the center of k -space to calculate the arterial input function (AIF) or to capitalize on its inherent motion robustness for developing free-breathing techniques. Radial sampling does, however, lend itself to combination with compressed sensing methods (see later) and may therefore see greater future application in 3D perfusion CMR techniques requiring particularly high acceleration factors.

Spiral imaging is another non-Cartesian technique in which data is acquired spiraling outward from the central raw data through k -space. Spiral pulse sequences have some inherent efficiency and SNR advantages over the radial technique, but are also more sensitive to off-resonance effects. However, careful selection of readout duration, flip angle strategy, and other sequence characteristics have been shown to compensate for spiral-related artifacts to produce high-quality high-resolution perfusion images. Most commonly, for 3D data acquisition, a stack of spiral planes with Fourier encoding in the third direction is used to achieve whole-heart coverage in a cylindrical distribution ( Fig. 5.6 ).

FIG. 5.6, (A) Stack-of-spirals three-dimensional perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Illustrative images acquired through stack of spirals during right ventricle blood pool (top), LV blood pool (middle), and LV myocardial (bottom) enhancement. Dotted lines indicate the middle slice, which was used for comparison with the corresponding single-slice two-dimensional (2D) Cartesian acquisition (not shown). (B–C) The corresponding myocardial signal–time curves for this and its corresponding 2D slice are shown, demonstrating good agreement, except for k-t parallel imaging artifacts in the early and late frames.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here