Mental Health and Behavioral Disorders in Pregnancy


Key Abbreviations

American Academy of Neurology AAN
American Academy of Pediatrics AAP
American Psychiatric Association APA
Antiepileptic drugs AED
Anorexia nervosa AN
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ADHD
Bipolar disorder BD
Binge eating disorder BED
Body mass index BMI
Bulimia nervosa BN
Cognitive behavioral therapy CBT
Carbamazepine CBZ
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC
Central nervous system CNS
Concentration to dose (ratio) C/D
Confidence interval CI
Electroconvulsive therapy ECT
Food and Drug Administration FDA
Hazard ratio HR
Intrauterine growth restriction IUGR
Low birthweight LBW
Lamotrigine LTG
Major depressive disorder MDD
Mood Disorders Questionnaire MDQ
Neonatal adaptation syndrome NAS
Neonatal intensive care unit NICU
Odds ratio OR
Patient Health Quality-9 item PHQ-9
Postpartum depression PPD
Preterm birth PTB
Posttraumatic stress disorder PTSD
Randomized controlled trial RCT
Relative risk RR
Small for gestational age SGA
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor SSRI
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and selective serotonin norepinephrine inhibitors inclusive SRI

Mental health is fundamental to overall health. This statement, made by former Surgeon General David Satcher, emphasized the view that emotional well-being is essential for good health. In medical practice, we compartmentalize symptoms and diseases into manageable units; however, the patient comes as an integrated whole. Pathology in any part of the body affects the entire patient. Psychiatric disorders are defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), a classification system that divides mental disorders into categories based on criteria sets with defining features. This chapter covers the major types of disorders that affect women of childbearing age. For the pregnant woman and her family, the capacity to function optimally, enjoy relationships, manage the pregnancy, and prepare for birth is critical.

Perinatal health can be conceptualized within a model that integrates the complex social, psychologic, behavioral, environmental, and biologic forces that shape pregnancy outcome. Misra et al. have presented a perinatal framework that integrates a lifespan approach with multiple determinants ( Fig. 59.1 ). The model contains four levels that provide a paradigm for the determinants of perinatal health outcomes. The first level in the model is Distal Determinants, which focuses on distal (in time) risk factors that place a woman at greater risk for proximal (current) risk factors. Distal determinants from biologic, physical, and social domains increase or decrease a woman's likelihood of developing health problems, engaging in high-risk behaviors, or being exposed to potential toxins. Some of the most powerful influences on health outcome are related to these historical women's health factors that occur long before pregnancy, such as maltreatment during childhood. At the next level, proximal determinants, risk factors that have a direct impact on a woman's health are represented by biomedical and behavioral responses, such as cigarette smoking. The interaction between distal and proximal risk factors determines an individual's current overall health status. The relationship between a woman's health status before conception and the demands of pregnancy shape perinatal outcomes. The third level, processes, underscores the dynamic interaction of pre-, inter-, and intraconceptional factors on reproductive health. The rapidly growing literature on the developmental origins of health and disease highlights the lifelong impact of the prenatal environment to program the physiologic evolution of the fetus and shape the individual's health into adulthood. At the fourth level, outcomes, the model includes disease, function, and well-being, providing a comprehensive view of health status.

Fig. 59.1
Integrated Perinatal Health Framework: a Multiple Determinants Model With a Lifespan Approach.

(Modified from Misra DP, Guyer B, Allston A. Integrated perinatal health framework. A multiple determinants model with a life-span approach. Am J Prev Med . 2003;25:65.)

Each patient comes to pregnancy with sets of malleable risks and assets. To the extent that biopsychosocial exposures with negative effects on pregnancy outcome can be diminished, eliminated, or replaced with positive factors, pregnancy outcome can be improved. For example, compromised fetal health results in a newborn “metaplastic” state that markedly increases the infant's sensitivity to the postpartum environment. The significance of maternal capacity to interact sensitively and support the attachment process is critical to the infant's optimal brain development.

The role of the physician is to influence the patient's exposures and behaviors to improve the probability of positive reproductive outcomes (see Fig. 59.1 ). Childbearing is an ideal time for health interventions because women have contact with professionals, increased access to healthcare coverage, and are motivated toward positive behaviors for the welfare of their offspring. The role of partners (fathers and coparents) has recently been identified as a research gap (and opportunity) in perinatal mental health. The partner can be engaged in interventions such as improving maternal mental health, encouraging obstetric care, and eliminating drug and alcohol use.

This discussion of psychiatric disorders includes four major diagnostic categories that mainly occur in women of childbearing age: mood, anxiety, eating, and schizophrenia. This chapter focuses on these disorders and their courses across pregnancy, postpartum, and lactation. Although substance-use disorders often occur with these illnesses, they are considered separately in Chapter 8 .

Mood Disorders

Major Depressive Episode

Diagnosis and Prevalence During Pregnancy and Postpartum

In the DSM-5, an episode of major depressive disorder (MDD) is defined as at least a 2-week period of either persistently depressed mood or loss of interest or pleasure in daily activities (required “gatekeeper” symptoms) plus four associated symptoms (or three if both gatekeeper symptoms are present) ( Box 59.1 ). Persistent means the symptom must be present for most of the day nearly every day. The patient must also have impairment of function in interpersonal relationships or work. It is possible to have a diagnosis of MDD without the symptom of depression. A woman could have persistent loss of interest or pleasure (but no sadness) and four of the other symptoms noted in Box 59.1 . Appetite, sleep, and motor activity can be either decreased or increased relative to the woman's norm. A fatigued woman who derives no pleasure from previously enjoyable activities, sleeps 15 hours a day, sits immobile for long periods, and gains weight has MDD. A guilt-ridden woman with sadness, 4 hours of sleep nightly, weight loss of 15 pounds, and pacing also has an MDD, which may be episodic or chronic.

Box 59.1
DSM-5 Criteria for Major Depressive Disorder

Over the last 2 weeks, most of the day nearly every day, five of the following (one symptom must involve mood or interest) must cause marked distress or impairment in important areas of functioning:

  • Depressed mood

  • Markedly diminished interest or pleasure

  • Significant weight loss or gain unrelated to dieting

  • Insomnia or hypersomnia

  • Psychomotor agitation/retardation

  • Fatigue or loss of energy

  • Feelings of worthlessness/guilt

  • Diminished ability to concentrate

  • Recurrent thoughts of death

Nearly twice as many women (12.0%) as men (6.6%) suffer from MDD each year. Women are at the greatest risk for MDD between 25 and 44 years of age, the primary age range for childbearing. The period prevalence of MDD is 12.7% during pregnancy (with 7.5% of women having a new episode), and 21.9% the year after parturition ; therefore MDD is among the most common complications of childbearing. Mothers at increased risk for depression are socioeconomically disadvantaged, have preterm infants, and are adolescents. Depression persists from months to years after childbirth, with lingering limitations in physical and psychologic functioning after recovery. Twenty-five to 50% of women with postpartum MDD have episodes lasting 7 months or more.

A woman's history of depression is the most important factor for assessing her risk for MDD during pregnancy. A previous episode lasting longer than 5 years nearly triples the risk for MDD in pregnancy (HR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5 to 4.7), whereas four or more episodes increase the risk by 3.6-fold (95% CI, 1.9 to 7.0). Stressful life events are predictors of a postpartum onset of MDD. Women with postpartum MDD have about a 25% to 33% risk for recurrence after a subsequent birth, and over 40% have MDD outside of pregnancy or the postpartum period. Depression is often a chronic, recurrent disorder.

The DSM-5 allows the designation with peripartum onset to specify episodes that begin during pregnancy or within the first 4 weeks postpartum. Epidemiologists have defined the duration of postpartum based on data about the break point between elevated risk for psychiatric illness after birth and the baseline risk for episodes in women of childbearing age. A significant peak in the rate of onset of mood disorders occurs in the 90-day period following childbirth. Although the definition of postpartum varies, the adverse effects of the disorder for the woman and her family are independent of time of onset.

The most commonly used measure to screen for MDD during childbearing is the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS, Fig. 59.2 ), which has been validated both during and after pregnancy. This self-report measure contains 10 items ranked from 0 to 3. It is scored by simple addition, and healthcare professionals can avail it for free. It is available in more than 23 languages. A cutoff score of greater than or equal to 13 (sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 78%; positive predictive value, 73%) for MDD has been recommended for screening in clinical settings. For pregnant women the recommended cutoff score is greater than or equal to 15. As with any screening tool, a positive test must be followed by diagnostic evaluation and treatment guidance. The differential diagnosis of MDD in the early postpartum period includes the “baby blues,” a transient syndrome occurring in up to 80% of mothers, which resolves within 2 weeks postpartum.

Fig. 59.2, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.

Natural History Across Childbearing

Periods of hormonal fluctuation (menstrual cycle, pregnancy, postpartum, and perimenopause) are associated with a higher risk for the emergence of MDD. The rapid change in gonadal steroid concentrations contributes to the etiology of postpartum onset MDD. The neurobiology of women who develop postpartum depression appears especially vulnerable to the mood-destabilizing effects of rapidly dropping concentrations of gonadal steroids.

Postpartum MDD does not differ from MDD at other periods during the childbearing years with respect to clinical presentation and duration of untreated episodes. However, aggressive obsessional thoughts occur more commonly in women who have postpartum-onset MDD compared with those suffering from depression outside the 1-year postpartum period. These more common obsessional thoughts that occur in the context of depression must be differentiated from delusions. Obsessions are recurrent, and persistent thoughts, impulses, or images are experienced as intrusive and inappropriate and cause marked anxiety or distress. For example, some mothers have obsessional thoughts about drowning their baby and refuse to bathe the child. Women often have frightening “what if” questions such as: “What if I put the baby in the microwave?” Obsessions differ from psychotic symptoms because patients recognize that the thoughts, impulses, or images are products of their own minds (not imposed by an external force, as in psychosis). Additionally, obsessional visual images may occur but are brief and perceived as being in the “mind's eye,” as opposed to an external hallucination. For example, a woman might have frightening images of her dead baby lying in a bathtub, but she would be aware that the image was not actually present in the real world. This distinction is important clinically because women with obsessional thoughts are vigilant about preventing any action related to the thought content. For example, if a mother has obsessional thoughts about stabbing her infant, she may insist that all knives be locked away. In contrast, women with psychosis may act on their thoughts. Although these symptom sets are not mutually exclusive, co-occurrence is very rare.

Perinatal depression affects reproductive outcomes. The physiologic dysregulations and psychosocial sequelae of MDD negatively affect pregnancy outcomes independent of antidepressant exposure. MDD is associated with poor prenatal care compliance, inadequate nutrition, obesity, smoking, alcohol and drug use, violence, poverty, and suicide. Perinatal mood disorders are associated with increased risks for maternal and infant mortality and morbidity. The Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care has published an evidence-based patient safety bundle that incorporates screening, intervention, referral, and follow-up into maternity care practice.

In a meta-analysis, Grote and colleagues reported that maternal MDD or depressive symptoms during pregnancy increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The associations between antenatal depression and adverse outcomes included preterm birth (PTB) (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.21) and low birthweight (LBW) (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.30). The magnitude of risk for PTB and LBW from MDD was comparable to the risk of smoking 10 or more cigarettes a day, but this is modest compared with the higher risks associated with black race and substance abuse. Depression and/or anxiety were associated with a threefold greater risk for preeclampsia, which may be related to the increased sympathetic activity characteristic of these psychiatric states. Children exposed to maternal MDD in utero have higher cortisol concentrations than infants of mothers who were not depressed, which constitutes a biochemical change that continues through adolescence and places the offspring at risk for developing mental illness. Children exposed to maternal MDD during fetal life are four times more likely than those not exposed to be depressed at age 16 years. Notably, maternal treatment of MDD during pregnancy normalizes infant cortisol concentrations.

Exposure to maternal depressive symptoms is associated with structural alterations in the fetal hippocampus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex. Infants born to mothers with antenatal depressive symptoms have greater functional connectivity of the amygdala with the temporal cortex and insula as well as the left and right anterior cingulate, medial orbitofrontal, and ventromedial prefrontal cortices even after adjustment for maternal postpartum depression. This connectivity pattern is similar to those observed in adults with MDD. Offspring of pregnant women with MDD are also at risk for insecure attachment and sleep and eating disorders. Other childhood sequelae of maternal mental illness are increased rates of accidental injury, child abuse, neglect, and infanticide. The relationship between maternal MDD and multiple childhood problems is a continuum that often begins during pregnancy.

Although MDD is a highly prevalent condition, only 1 in 5 Americans receive any guideline-concordant intervention, and the rate of intervention is lower in pregnant women than nonpregnant women . In nearly 6500 Medicaid recipients with established treatment for MDD, women who became pregnant had a significantly greater drop in both outpatient psychotherapy visits and antidepressant prescription claims than matched nonpregnant women, and care did not resume after birth.

The evidence-based treatments for MDD are psychotherapy and antidepressants. Studies of interpersonal psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy document both reduced depressive symptoms and improved maternal function following treatment during pregnancy. Psychotherapy is the preferred treatment for most women; however, it is not available in all practice settings, nor is it feasible for resource-challenged mothers. Barriers to clinic-based depression care include the physical demands of pregnancy, transportation, childcare, and cost. Adult outpatient settings do not typically offer flexible appointment schedules and many do not welcome children. If psychotherapy is not feasible or the woman prefers pharmacotherapy, decision making tends to focus on the potential adverse effects of medication rather than the adverse effects of MDD. The result is often a choice by the woman or her physician to avoid or stop drug treatment to obviate fetal exposure to pharmacotherapy without equal consideration of the risks of MDD to both the mother and fetus. For many pregnant women, the reality is that accessible and acceptable mental health treatment is very limited.

Low treatment rates are a public health concern given accumulating evidence that MDD during pregnancy increases risk to the pregnant woman and fetus and affects long-term health outcomes for both. Federally funded home visitation programs for disadvantaged women are potential partners for integrated care with obstetricians and mental health professionals to improve rates of depression treatment. Collaborative care has also been demonstrated to improve access to mental health treatment with improved depression and anxiety symptoms in the perinatal setting. Collaborative care is a type of integrated care that adheres to five core principles: patient-centered team care, population-based care, measurement-based treatment to target, evidence-based care, and accountable care. A care manager serves as the hub, tracking symptom monitoring for all patients enrolled and ensuring implementation of specialist-provided stepped-care recommendations. Although randomized trials have demonstrated the efficacy of perinatal collaborative care, implementation studies demonstrating effectiveness are needed.

Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder During Pregnancy

A risk-benefit decision-making model for the treatment of MDD during pregnancy has been published. Individually tailored interventions are considered for their capacity to maximize maternal wellness while also minimizing adverse effects for the maternal-fetal pair. The patient and physician both contribute expertise to the process because the patient's assignment of her own values dictates her choice. For example, some women will not consent to pharmacotherapy during pregnancy regardless of the impairment related to the MDD. Others choose pharmacotherapy because they are not confident that other treatments will be efficacious or because discontinuing medication has invariably been followed by recurrence. The verbal informed consent process promotes the treatment alliance, recognizes the patient's responsibility to make choices for herself and her fetus, and provides an opportunity for ongoing assessment of her competence to make decisions.

Using the word safe is problematic, as it implies no possibility of an adverse effect to many patients. Confirming any exposure as harmless presents the impossible task of proving no adverse effect on any reproductive or developmental outcomes throughout the exposed offspring's lifespan. What can be estimated from available studies is the magnitude of a subset of reproductive risks in drug-treated women. The risk for multiple domains of reproductive toxicity considered in this chapter is as follows: miscarriage and stillbirth, birth defects, PTB, neonatal effects, and neurobehavioral development. A major methodologic challenge is confounding by indication , the difficulty separating the reproductive effects of the drug exposure from the sequelae, both physiologic and psychosocial, of the underlying MDD. Progress has been made in disentangling the effects of drug from those of the disease through the analysis of large datasets and sophisticated statistical applications, as described later in this chapter.

Members of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the American Psychiatric Association (APA) developed a consensus document for antidepressant treatment during pregnancy. For mild cases of MDD in pregnant women, psychotherapy is the treatment of choice as the initial intervention. Several types of short-term (8 to 16 sessions) of manual-based psychotherapy are available, such as interpersonal psychotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). These treatments can be delivered by nonphysician professionals such as psychologists, psychiatric nurse clinicians, or licensed clinical social workers. The cost and accessibility of depression treatment also affects treatment selection.

For moderate to severe MDD with marked functional impairment, antidepressant pharmacotherapy or combination therapy (medication and psychotherapy) is appropriate. Established efficacy and tolerability of any antidepressant for the individual woman is a strong consideration in drug choice during the risk-benefit decision-making process. Women with chronic or highly recurrent MDD may be on maintenance antidepressant medication when pregnancy occurs. Such treatment is recommended after three or more episodes of MDD owing to the near-certain likelihood of recurrence. For pregnant women studied in an academic setting, the risk of relapse for those who discontinued antidepressant treatment proximate to conception was significantly greater than that among women who maintained treatment. Among 82 women who continued their medication, 21 (26%) relapsed, compared with 44 (68%) of 65 women who discontinued medication. In contrast, Yonkers et al. found that pregnant women who continued antidepressants experienced the same rate of MDD recurrence as those who stopped in a community sample of obstetric patients. However, the strongest predictor for recurrence in both studies was four or more episodes of MDD prior to pregnancy.

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Exposure and Reproductive Outcomes

MDD and its sequelae also affect the outcomes below and must be considered when the risks associated with exposure to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) are being assessed.

Miscarriage and Stillbirth

In a nationwide cohort study of pregnancies in Denmark from 1997 to 2010, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for miscarriage after exposure to an SSRI was 1.27 (95% CI, 1.22 to 1.33) compared with no exposure. However, women discontinuing SSRI treatment 3 to 12 months before pregnancy also had a similar HR for miscarriage compared with those who had not been exposed (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.30), which implies confounding by indication rather than a true drug risk. In a population-based Danish cohort study, stillbirth was not associated with first-trimester SSRI use.

Birth Defects

The findings from studies that evaluated the association between SSRI and birth defects have been variable; however, recent progress has been made with respect to addressing the problem of confounding by indication. Two large-scale case-control studies revealed no increased risk for overall rates of malformations, including cardiac anomalies, for SSRI (combined drugs) exposure. In an influential American population-based cohort study, Huybrechts et al. found no increase in the risk of cardiac malformations attributable to antidepressant use during the first trimester. A total of 64,389 women (6.8%) were exposed to antidepressants during the first trimester. Overall, 6403 infants who were not exposed to antidepressants were born with a cardiac defect (72.3 per 10,000 infants) compared with 580 infants with exposure (90.1 per 10,000 infants). Associations between antidepressant use and cardiac defects were attenuated with increasing levels of adjustment, which implies that confounding variables, rather than drug exposure, accounted for much of the impact on congenital malformations. The relative risks of any cardiac defect with the use of SSRIs were 1.25 (95% CI, 1.13 to 1.38) in the unadjusted analysis and markedly attenuated (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.26) in the analysis restricted to women who had a diagnosis of MDD. Stratification according to propensity scoring allowed comparisons to be made between population subgroups with nearly identical characteristics (sociodemographics, comorbid disease, drug use, and smoking) but who differed on drug exposure. This strategy also addresses the differences in women with psychiatric disorders who chose to continue medication compared to those who did not on a broad range of potential confounders. After propensity score stratification, the RR was nonsignificant (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.22). A similar pattern of increased risk for cardiac malformations in unadjusted analyses became insignificant after adjustment was noted for tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, bupropion, and other antidepressants. Studies of first-trimester SSRI exposure do not demonstrate consistent data to support an increased risk for structural malformations.

Preterm Birth

In a prospective study ( N = 238) of pregnant women with MDD, MDD with SSRI treatment, and controls with neither exposure, the offspring of women who were either continuously treated with an SSRI (23%) or continuously exposed to MDD (21%) experienced similar rates of PTB. Early and late PTB frequencies were similar, which suggests confounding by indication. A protective effect of SSRI treatment was suggested in a population-based prospective birth cohort study from Finland. Newborns of pregnant women who were prescribed SSRIs had a lower risk for late PTB (odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.96) and early PTB (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.74) compared with mothers with psychiatric disorders but who were not taking medications. The authors adjusted these analyses for clinically relevant covariates that were associated with exposure status. An intriguing hypothesis is that these women were treated to remission, which removed disease exposure; however, no depression symptom scores were included in the publication. Nevertheless, the SSRI-treated mothers had offspring with significantly more neonatal complications, including low Apgar score (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.34 to 2.12) and monitoring in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.35).

Neonatal Effects

Neonatal adaptation syndrome (NAS) occurs in 20% to 30% of infants born to mothers treated with SSRIs. A meta-analysis of 30 studies showed that antidepressant use in pregnancy was associated with NAS (OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 3.25 to 7.90), specifically respiratory distress (OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.81 to 2.66) and tremors (OR, 7.89; 95% CI, 3.33 to 18.73). The reasons that some exposed infants are affected are not understood. Supportive medical management is sufficient for most newborns; however, the rate of NICU admission for SSRI-exposed compared with unexposed newborns was 13.7% versus 8.2%, respectively (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 1.5). The number needed to harm was 29; that is, for every 29 newborns exposed to an SSRI during fetal life, one excess NICU admission occurred. Although neonatal signs are commonly considered as “withdrawal” phenomena, studies of serotonin metabolites in cord blood suggest that the etiology is CNS hyperstimulation. NAS was also believed to be transient; however, detailed studies of newborn behavior over the first 30 days after birth revealed that some signs continue throughout this time frame and increase in intensity. The knowledge gaps for NAS include a consensus definition, duration of signs, and maternal and fetal predictors.

Based on the premise that neonatal signs are due to direct pharmacologic effects, tapering and discontinuation of the antidepressant over 10 days to 2 weeks before the anticipated delivery date with reintroduction of drug immediately after birth have been suggested; however, data to demonstrate improved outcomes for mothers or newborns have not been published, and this strategy may carry more risk to the maternal-fetal pair than continued treatment.

Neurobehavioral Development

Few data about the postbirth development of individuals exposed to an SSRI in utero have been published; however, most converge on the finding that cognitive development is similar in exposed and nonexposed children . In a prospective longitudinal study, infants with prenatal SSRI ( n = 41) or MDD exposure ( n = 27) and 98 nonexposed controls were evaluated with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Neither prenatal exposure to an SSRI nor MDD significantly affected overall scores; however, SSRI exposure was associated with lower psychomotor development scores at 26 and 52 weeks compared with nonexposure. This difference was no longer significant at 78 weeks. Although lower psychomotor scores were observed in the first year, the scores remained within the normative range and were transient.

An examination of the association between SSRI exposure during pregnancy and offspring scholastic, speech/language, and motor disorders through early adolescence was conducted in a Finnish population-based registry. Three groups of offspring were compared: 15,596 SSRI-exposed women identified by the purchase of SSRIs during pregnancy; 9537 psychiatrically ill but unmedicated mothers; and 31,207 women without psychiatric illness or SSRI exposure. The cumulative hazard of speech/language disorders was 87 per 10,000 in the SSRI-exposed group versus 61 per 10,000 in the unmedicated but psychiatrically ill group (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.70; P = .004). For scholastic and motor disorders, no differences between groups were observed.

Studies of long-term outcomes attributed to in utero exposure are challenging because postbirth parental and psychosocial factors play a major role in shaping development. In a Norwegian Birth Registry study, children born to women who used SSRIs in early, mid or late pregnancy were compared with children unexposed to both depression and pharmacotherapy. Although prenatal SSRI exposure had no effect on the rates of externalizing, social, or emotional problems, children exposed to SSRIs during late pregnancy (>29 weeks) had an increased risk of anxious or depressed behavior at 5 years compared with unexposed children. The magnitude of the effect equated to 8 affected children for every 100 women treated with an SSRI in late gestation. As the authors commented, residual confounding by depression severity, genetic vulnerability to internalizing psychopathology, and unmeasured confounding by environmental factors are alternative explanations to SSRI exposure. Other authors hypothesized that prenatal SSRI exposure increases the risk for mood disorder in children after the pubertal transition. In a cohort study with national registry data in Finland, four groups of pregnant women and their offspring were studied: SSRI exposed; psychiatric disorder, no antidepressants; exposed to SSRIs before pregnancy; and no exposure to antidepressants and no psychiatric disorders. The cumulative incidence of depression among offspring exposed prenatally to SSRIs was 8.2% (CI, 3.1 to 13.3) by age 14.9 years compared with 1.9% (CI, 0.9 to 2.9) in the psychiatric disorder–no medication group and 2.8% (CI, 1.4to 4.3) in the SSRI-discontinued group. The authors concluded that prenatal SSRI exposure was associated with increased rates of MDD diagnoses in early adolescence; however, confounding due to factors associated with depression and SSRI treatment in pregnancy that differ from those of the women who do not take or discontinue medication is possible. The rates of anxiety, autism spectrum disorder, and attention-deficit hyperactivity/disorder (ADHD) diagnoses were comparable to those in offspring of psychiatrically ill mothers who did not take medication in pregnancy.

Dosage Requirements Across Pregnancy

All antidepressants are at least partially metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6, which increases in activity during pregnancy and results in declining plasma drug concentrations. The dose requirements and concentration-to-dose ratios of the SSRIs fluoxetine, citalopram, escitalopram, and sertraline change during pregnancy and postpartum. In the majority of women, the concentrations for the parent compound and metabolites decrease between 20 weeks’ gestation and delivery. Pharmacogenetic characterization is not currently a standard of care for antidepressant therapy; however, Ververs et al. showed that CYP 2D6 genotypes predicted plasma paroxetine concentrations during pregnancy. Women who were extensive metabolizers ( n = 43) and ultrarapid metabolizers ( n = 1) showed steadily decreasing plasma paroxetine concentrations across pregnancy with escalating depressive symptoms. In contrast, plasma paroxetine levels of intermediate metabolizers ( n = 25) and poor metabolizers ( n = 5) increased during pregnancy. Weight gain, maternal age, and smoking did not influence drug concentrations. Paroxetine is unique among the SSRIs in having 2D6 as the sole metabolic pathway. For most SSRIs, doses must be incrementally increased during the second half of pregnancy to offset greater drug metabolism. Serial administration of a quantitative depression measure (e.g., EPDS or Patient Health Quality-9 item [PHQ-9]) is recommended to identify early symptoms of relapse, which require an incremental increase in the dose of the drug (for example, 25 to 50 mg of sertraline). The goal is to provide optimal drug dosing across the changing milieu of pregnancy to maximally reduce disease burden.

Integrative Treatments

Recognized as a treatment for seasonal (winter) MDD, light therapy has also been shown to be efficacious for nonseasonal MDD. Light therapy is delivered as an early-morning bolus of 10,000 lux illuminance with commercially available boxes for 30 minutes ( Fig. 59.3 ). The light units conform to stringent standards, with illumination of a broad visual field, lighting from above to avoid glare, and maximal ultraviolet screening. Light therapy for pregnant women with MDD was explored in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with bright white (active) versus dim red (placebo) light delivered in the early morning for 1 hour across 5 weeks. The response rates were significantly greater for bright white than dim red light and comparable to data obtained from antidepressant drug treatment. MDD must be distinguished from depression in the context of bipolar disorder because morning light therapy may induce agitation or irritability indicative of hypomania or mixed mood states in women with bipolar disorder.

Fig. 59.3, Light Therapy Box.

Poor nutrition contributes to the pathogenesis of MDD. Folate and vitamin B12 are needed for single-carbon metabolism involved in the synthesis of serotonin and other monoamine neurotransmitters and catecholamines. Folate, B12, iron, zinc, and selenium deficiencies are more common among depressed than nondepressed individuals. The depletion of nutrient reserves throughout pregnancy and lactation may increase a woman's risk for MDD. Marginal or low folate status also increases the likelihood of nonresponse to antidepressant medication as well as the probability of relapse.

Omega-3 fatty acids are essential long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids found in nerve cell membranes. Eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids are derived primarily from fish. The American diet is relatively deficient in omega-3 compared with omega-6 fatty acids and other fats. Increased requirements during pregnancy raise the risk of deficiency and potentially of MDD. Omega-3 fatty acids have been used to treat perinatal MDD in small RCTs, but efficacy beyond placebo has not been convincingly demonstrated. However, docosahexaenoic acid supplementation may attenuate the effects of maternal stress during late pregnancy and reduce fetal exposure to glucocorticoids in women living in urban low-income environments. Women who received supplementation reported less stress and had lower levels of stress hormones in the third trimester than placebo-treated women.

Treatment of Postpartum Major Depressive Disorder

Antidepressants effective for MDD in women outside of childbearing are similarly effective during the perinatal period. In a randomized comparative efficacy trial with no placebo, the tricyclic nortriptyline ( n = 54) was compared with sertraline ( n = 55), and the response rates were equal. The dosing started with 25 mg sertraline (for 2 days, then to 50 mg/d) and was increased every 2 weeks to a maximum of 150 and 200 mg/d, respectively. A major finding was that the dose of sertraline required for remission in this 8-week double-blind protocol was 100 mg/d or more, with many women requiring 150 to 200 mg/d. Therefore the usual starting dose of 50 mg/d was not efficacious for the majority of women and dose adjustment should be anticipated approximately 2 weeks after treatment initiation. Another RCT of sertraline compared with placebo demonstrated efficacy for sertraline with a mean dose of 100 ± 54 mg/d. Remission (PHQ-9 or EPDS score of 4 or less) is the goal of treatment.

In a small novel study of the efficacy of estradiol treatment, Gregoire et al. randomized women with severe postpartum MDD to placebo or estradiol delivered by transdermal patch (200 µg/d) for 6 months. By 3 months, 80% of the estradiol-treated and 31% of the placebo-treated group responded. Endometrial changes were found in three participants at the study conclusion (6 months) despite coadministration of dydrogesterone (10 mg/d, 12 days per month in the final 3 months of the RCT); however, these changes resolved at follow-up. The inclusion of women who took concurrent antidepressant medications limits the ability to discern an estradiol-specific effect. No further RCTs have been published. With respect to breastfeeding, no estradiol was detected in the milk of 18 women treated with transdermal estradiol 50 to 100 µg/d for 12 weeks.

Prevention of Postpartum Major Depressive Disorder

To reduce the risk for postpartum MDD, an interpersonal therapy-based four-session group intervention was provided to pregnant women receiving public assistance. Within 3 months after delivery, 20% of the women in usual care developed postpartum MDD compared with 4% of those who received interpersonal psychotherapy.

One small RCT demonstrated the efficacy of immediate postpartum sertraline compared with placebo to prevent the emergence of MDD. Women with a history of at least one episode of MDD were randomized to sertraline or placebo immediately following birth. Of 14 subjects treated with sertraline, 1 (7%) suffered a recurrence, whereas 4 of 8 subjects (50%, P = .04) who were assigned to placebo suffered recurrences. The dosing protocol in milligrams per day was as follows: 25 mg for 4 days, then 50 mg through week 4, and 75 mg thereafter. The recommended duration of preventive treatment was a minimum of 6 months. The explanation for sertraline's efficacy is based on its serotonergic impact; therefore the use of another serotonergic drug, particularly one to which the woman has responded, is reasonable. Although open-label studies supported that progesterone prevented recurrence, a placebo-controlled RCT of a synthetic progesterone increased the risk for depressive symptoms at 6 weeks postpartum.

Treatment During Breastfeeding

Antidepressant exposure to the infant through breast milk is markedly lower than that to the fetus ( Table 59.1 ). The medication associated with remission and tolerability for the individual woman is the drug of choice. If she has had no prior treatment, the SSRI sertraline or paroxetine would be the agent of first choice. These drugs are characterized by nonquantifiable or very low plasma concentrations ingested by breastfed infants, in accordance with data from multiple laboratories, and there have been no reports of major adverse events. Other antidepressants (venlafaxine, duloxetine, and bupropion) are second-line choices for breastfeeding women unless their efficacy in prior episodes has been established or the woman has been treated with these medications in pregnancy. Changing drugs after birth risks relapse due to nonresponse in the vulnerable period.

TABLE 59.1
Selected Antidepressant Levels in Breast-fed Infants’ Sera
Drugs of First Choice for the Breastfeeding Woman Serum Level Range in Breastfed Infants Typical Maternal Dose Range, mg/d
Nortriptyline a Nortriptyline, below limit of quantifiability to 10 ng/mL 50–150; maternal therapeutic serum levels: 50–150 ng/mL
Nortriptyline metabolites E-10-OH- Nortriptyline ≤4–16 ng/mL
Z-10-OH- Nortriptyline ≤4–17 ng/mL
Sertraline Sertraline, below limit of quantifiability to 8 ng/mL 50–200
Sertraline metabolites Norsertraline = below limit of quantifiability to 26 ng/mL
Paroxetine
No active metabolites
Paroxetine, below limit of quantifiability 10–60
Other Antidepressants b
Fluoxetine Fluoxetine, below quantifiability to 340 ng/mL 20–60
Fluoxetine metabolite c Norfluoxetine, below quantifiability to 265 ng/mL
Citalopram Citalopram, below quantifiability to 12.7 ng/mL 20–40
Citalopram metabolite Desmethylcitalopram, below quantifiability to 3.1 ng/mL
Venlafaxine Venlafaxine, below quantifiability to 5 ng/mL 75–375
Venlafaxine metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine, below quantifiability to 38 ng/mL
Bupropion
Multiple metabolites
Average infant exposure
Expected to be 2% of the standard maternal dose on a molar basis; infant serum levels not measured in largest series of N = 10 d
300

a The most-studied tricyclic antidepressant during breastfeeding. This drug class is currently minimally used.

b Established efficacy of an antidepressant in a woman is a strong consideration in drug selection.

c As active as fluoxetine and has a longer half-life than the parent drug.

d Haas JS, Kaplan CP, Barenboim D, et al. Bupropion in breast milk: an exposure assessment for potential treatment to prevent postpartum tobacco use. Tob Control . 2004;13(1):52–56.

The published data are largely for full-term infants. Maternal and infant plasma concentration data for preterm, low-birthweight, or sick infants would be a useful contribution to the literature. Monitoring to detect adverse effects that may be associated with the maternal drug should include infant behavioral activation or sedation or new-onset feeding or sleeping problems. Laboratory measurement of plasma drug concentrations in healthy full-term, normally developing infants is not warranted.

Suicide Risk

According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the pregnancy-related death rate in the United States has steadily increased across the past three decades. Self-harm (unintentional overdose and suicide) is a common cause of pregnancy-associated fatalities, with most deaths occurring in the first year postpartum. In a large-scale study of 10,000 women screened with the EPDS, the proportions of response on item 10 (“The thought of harming myself has occurred to me”) were: 0 = never, n = 9681 (96.81%); 1 = hardly ever, n = 246 (2.46%); 2 = sometimes, n = 65 (0.65%); 3 = yes, quite often, n = 8 (.08%). In this group of 10,000 women screened by phone, 3.2% of women had suicidal ideation.

Suicide assessment requires direct questioning of the patient about her desire to live or die, specific thoughts about killing herself, plans for carrying out the act, and access to lethal means . The APA practice guidelines for the assessment of suicidal behaviors provide questions for clinicians to assess suicidal thoughts, plans, and behaviors. Initial questions address patients’ feelings about living (“Have you ever thought that life was not worth living?” “Did you ever wish you could go to sleep and just not wake up?”). These are followed by questions that address specific thoughts about death, self-harm, and suicide (“Have things ever reached the point that you’ve thought of harming yourself?”). If thoughts of self-harm are endorsed, evaluation of the intensity, frequency, timing, persistence, and specific plans to inflict harm must be undertaken. Such women should be asked about pills, household poisons, and firearms, and whether they have made preparations for the plan or for after their death (writing a will and arranging for childcare). If the safety of the patient is at risk, emergency psychiatric consultation or involuntary commitment is imperative.

Bipolar Disorder

Diagnosis and Prevalence

The diagnosis of MDD is limited to the lifetime experience of normal mood with episodes of depression; in contrast, bipolar disorder (BD) is characterized by normal, depressed, and euphoric or irritable mood states (mania or hypomania, its less intense form). Changes in energy and activity levels are prominent and parallel variations in mood. Mania is a persistent, abnormally euphoric, expansive or irritable mood state, with inflated self-esteem, agitation, heightened energy, racing thoughts, pressured speech, impulsive behaviors, distractibility, and poor judgment for a minimum of 1 week. Impairment in function must be present. Hypomania is defined by a minimum of 4 continuous days of persistently increased creativity, productivity, and sociability or increased irritability that family or coworkers notice. The woman's function may be enhanced by creativity and increased energy. Many artists, writers, and world leaders have this disorder. In women, irritability and depression rather than euphoria are the predominant mood states, and BD is frequently misdiagnosed as unipolar depression . Atypical symptoms of depression (increased appetite, weight gain, hypersomnia, low energy, and a sense of heaviness) typically appear in the fall or winter and resolve in spring. This subtype of depression is common in women with BD.

The lifetime prevalence of BD is 1% to 2%. BD type I, which affects women and men equally, is characterized by MDD and periods of mania or hypomania. The BD variants type II (MDD and hypomania only), mixed episodes (intermingled manic and depressive symptoms), and rapid cycling (four or more episodes of opposite polarity in 1 year) are more common in women than men. Women with BD often have comorbid anxiety disorders; alcohol or substance (especially marijuana) use disorders; bulimia nervosa; histories of childhood or adult physical and/or sexual abuse; and medical problems, including migraines, metabolic syndrome, pain disorders, and hypothyroidism.

The differentiation of MDD from BD is often challenging and delays of 7 to 11 years until the diagnosis are common. Prescribing an antidepressant without an antimanic drug for a woman with BD can precipitate agitation, irritability, mania, or mixed or rapid cycling episodes. In such cases the antidepressant must be discontinued. To screen patients for BD, the most commonly used measure is the Mood Disorders Questionnaire (MDQ) ( Fig. 59.4 ), which assesses lifetime history of mania with 13 yes/no symptoms and two additional questions: a yes/no query about whether symptoms occurred during the same time period and a designation of the degree to which the symptoms caused impairment in function. A positive screen requires seven or more symptoms during the same period that caused moderate or serious problems. The MDQ can be combined with the EPDS as a screening tool with modification of the original MDQ scoring for screening perinatal women. The traditional diagnostic interview established BD in 50% of women and in almost 70% when the MDQ was scored without the impairment criterion . The MDQ or a diagnostic assessment for BD should be given prior to prescribing antidepressants for a perinatal woman with symptoms of MDD.

Fig. 59.4, Mood Disorder Questionnaire.

Natural History Across Childbearing

The course of episodes is useful in evaluating the risk for recurrence of BD during pregnancy. Women with mood episodes occurring only after birth are not likely to relapse during pregnancy even without medication. However, women with a chronic course are likely to be symptomatic during pregnancy, and mood-stabilizing treatment is appropriate. For women with chronic BD, discontinuation of drug treatment proximal to conception incurred a high risk for recurrence (86%) compared with patients who continued treatment (37%). After birth, all women with BD are at high risk for recurrent mood episodes. Postpartum relapse rates of 66% (95% CI 57% to 75%) without medication treatment compared with 23% (95% CI, 14% to 37%) with prophylactic medication compel initiating treatment immediately postpartum to prevent relapse for women who have not been treated in pregnancy.

Postpartum psychosis is typically a manifestation of BD, such as depression, mixed state (both manic and depressive symptoms together), or mania with psychotic features. It occurs in 1 to 2 per 1000 births in the first month following delivery. Women are more vulnerable to psychosis in the postbirth period than at any other time during their lives. The massive reproductive hormone decline at delivery drives the risk for psychosis in vulnerable women. In the first 30 days after birth, a woman is 21.7 times more likely to develop psychosis than in the 2-year period prior to childbirth. After an index episode, 20% to 50% of women have only postpartum psychotic episodes without recurrence outside of childbearing. Sleep deprivation and circadian rhythm disturbance, autoimmune thyroiditis, and infections are treatable conditions that contribute to the risk for mood instability. Inborn errors of metabolism, particularly urea cycle disorders (characterized by high plasma ammonia concentrations) and autoimmune N-methyl-d-aspartate encephalitis are rare causes of psychosis after childbirth.

The clinical picture of postpartum psychosis is characterized by a rapid onset of severe mood fluctuations, marked cognitive impairment suggestive of delirium, bizarre behavior, insomnia, visual and auditory hallucinations, unusual hallucinations (tactile and olfactory), and impaired judgment and insight. Specific types of delusional thoughts are related to risk for infanticide. Delusional altruistic homicide (often associated with maternal suicide) to save both mother and baby “from a fate worse than death” was reported in a review of filicides. Sensitive direct questions about thoughts of harm to the infant are imperative in the examination. Nonjudgmental inquiry can be made as follows: “Some new mothers have thoughts such as wishing the baby were dead or about harming the baby; has this happened to you?”

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here