Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
A doctrine introduced in 1945 by Jehovah’s Witnesses teaches that the Bible prohibits the consumption, storage, and transfusion of human blood (Genesis 9:3, 4 and Acts 15:19, 20). The Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania have issued many doctrines since that time, citing that “blood is sacred to God,” and “even in the case of an emergency, it is not permissible to sustain life with transfused blood.” These beliefs stem from the interpretation of Biblical scriptures. Many Jehovah’s Witnesses carry medical directive “No Blood” cards, stating that blood transfusions are unacceptable. The use of blood derivatives, however, is not specifically prohibited, and the Watch Tower encourages members to personally decide whether accepting these component fractions violates the doctrine(s). Examples of potentially accepted blood product derivatives include cryoprecipitate, albumin, immunoglobulin therapy, human- derived clotting factor concentrates, and interleukins. Recombinant proteins (e.g., recombinant factor VIIa) are generally accepted by Jehovah’s Witnesses, as are blood substitutes (hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers) ( Fig. 56.1 ).
While standard transfusions are unacceptable, there are some related procedures that are not specifically prohibited. These include plasma exchange, dialysis, intraoperative blood salvage, hemodilution, blood donation strictly for the purpose of further fractionation of components, and transfusion of autologous blood as long as a continuous circuit with the patient remains. Transfusion of preoperatively donated autologous blood is, however, typically prohibited, due to the belief that blood should not be taken out of the body and stored ( Table 56.1 ).
Acceptable Treatment |
---|
|
Personal Decision (Acceptable to Some, Declined by Others) |
|
Unacceptable Treatment |
|
a Patients might request that continuity is maintained with their vascular system.
b Circuits not primed with allogeneic blood.
c Cryoprecipitate suspended in 0.9% sodium chloride injection (USP) diluent.
The right of a competent adult to refuse consent for medical treatment is accepted, and documentation of refusal for transfusion should be placed in the medical record. Electronic medical record and laboratory information systems may be useful in preventing blood from being inadvertently ordered or transfused to a non-consenting patient. Worst-case scenario discussions should be held with patients who refuse blood products, and documentation to this effect should be included in the medical record; some clinicians opt to have patients sign the notes stating that these discussions were held. Forcing a non-consenting patient to receive a transfusion unwillingly can be viewed as battery, and a Jehovah’s Witness who accepts a transfusion can be spiritually cut off from a community of family and friends.
Situations of trauma are difficult, in that medical directive cards may not be immediately available. If there is any doubt in a clinician’s mind as to the wishes of the patient or as to what is legally appropriate, it is recommended that the clinician treat per the accepted standards of care until legal documentation is available.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here