Liver transplantation: Perioperative anesthetic considerations


Introduction

The Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation estimates that more than 35,000 liver transplantations are performed annually worldwide, but the number of patients on the waiting list continues to exceed donor organ availability. Because of the continuous donor shortage, dramatic changes in recipient and donor selection have emerged in the past decade, leading to an amplification of clinical challenges for perioperative liver transplant physicians. United Network for Organ Sharing data from the 2018 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients ( https://www.srtr.org/reports-tools/srtroptn-annual-data-report/ ) show that patients older than 65 and those with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score equal to or higher than 30 are more frequently transplanted and that prevalence of obesity and diabetes among transplant recipients has increased markedly over the past 10 years. In addition, combined kidney and liver transplants are also performed more often than in previous years, and extended-criteria donors are increasingly used, including donation after cardiac death (see Chapters 105 and 109 ).

Despite the increasing medical complexity, overall graft and patient outcomes have continued to improve. According to the US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)/Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) 2018 Annual Data Report Health and Human Services (HHS)/Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), graft survival rates of patients transplanted with a cadaveric graft are about 92% at 1 year for transplants performed in 2017, 84% at 3 years for transplants performed in 2015, and 76% at 5 years for transplants performed in 2013.

These encouraging figures, achieved by experienced transplant teams, have resulted from the progressive advancement and standardization of surgical and anesthetic techniques and the adoption of a systematic approach to quality improvement (QI) and patient safety in this demanding multidisciplinary area of healthcare. With current trends of transplanting older and sicker recipients and the expanded use of marginal donor organs, patient outcomes critically depend on accurate and timely perioperative assessment and medical management by an anesthesiology consultant, among others.

COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic, named for the illness caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has been spreading across the world since the end of 2019 and has challenged the (liver) transplantation system worldwide, resulting in a temporary decrease of transplant activities.

This epidemic presents multiple issues for liver transplant centers: (1) the straining of resources (limited intensive care unit [ICU] bed and equipment availability); (2) the concerns for the risk of nosocomial COVID-19 infection in recipients, and the possibility of transmitting the disease to healthcare workers; and (3) the recognition that COVID-19 may manifest with hepatic signs and symptoms common to other forms of acute hepatitis, mandating that patients presenting with newly elevated serum liver enzymes undergo a comprehensive differential diagnostic process. The orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) community has responded to these challenges by creating “COVID-19 protocols,” which often include screening for both donors and recipients before liver transplant ; the use of “good-quality graft,” which will likely result in expeditious recipient recovery and discharge from hospitals ; and the use of telemedicine to minimize the need for bringing in OLT candidates for transplant evaluation and recipients for routine follow-up visits.

It is too soon to draw any conclusions on the effectiveness of these measures to support clinical activities and protect patients and healthcare team members. Liver transplant centers should therefore continue to use caution and closely monitor their performance and clinical outcomes.

Preoperative anesthetic assessment

Liver transplantation is the definitive treatment for acute and chronic irreversible liver failure; for syndromes not manifesting with end-stage liver disease (ESLD), including polycystic liver disease and metabolic diseases; for some malignancies confined to the liver; and for cholestatic liver diseases. Of accepted contraindications to OLT, those of particular interest to anesthesiologists include severe cardiopulmonary conditions, such as symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD), severe systolic dysfunction, advanced cardiomyopathy, severe valvular heart disease, severe pulmonary hypertension, sustained intracranial pressure greater than 50 mm Hg, and uncontrolled sepsis. More recently, the impact of frailty on liver transplant outcomes has been recognized and the use of standardized tools to assess frailty in the evaluation of liver transplant candidates has been recommended. As part of a multidisciplinary transplant team, anesthesiologists should participate in the evaluation of candidate recipients. A 2012 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) bylaw mandates that transplant centers appoint a Director of Liver Transplant Anesthesia and establish the directorship criteria, based largely on recommendations by the American Society of Anesthesiologists. This decision by UNOS was motivated by the evidence that standardized care by a dedicated and experienced liver transplant anesthesia team may influence key quality and safety outcomes and resource utilization, including blood transfusion, length of mechanical ventilation, and duration of ICU and hospital stay. An anesthetic evaluation is part of a multidisciplinary team approach to assess suitability for transplant, optimize medical management, and design an individualized perioperative treatment plan. Efforts based on a machine-learning approach are ongoing to develop predictive models for perioperative mortality of cadaveric liver transplant recipients at the time of their initial evaluation. For patients, whose comorbidities present a prohibitive operative risk, alternative treatments should be considered , (see Chapter 105 ).

Central nervous system

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a progressive but potentially reversible syndrome of the central nervous system (CNS) associated with variable degrees of brain edema. Presentation ranges from subclinical to coma. HE is an overt or covert manifestation of cirrhosis in up to 80% of cirrhotic patients, and it is a defining sign and main cause of death in acute liver failure (ALF) , (see Chapters 77 , 78 , and 105 ). Based on the etiology, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recognizes that type A is associated with ALF, type B with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), and type C with cirrhosis. Based on the severity of neurologic impairment, HE ranges from unimpaired to minimal (grade 0) to coma and brain death (grade 4). Because presence and severity of HE is of prognostic significance, including impaired brain recovery post-transplant, experts have called for its inclusion into the MELD score (see Chapter 4 ).

The pathophysiology of HE is complex and incompletely understood. Evidence supports the central role of ammonia, which bypasses first-pass liver clearance via portosystemic shunting. Ammonia crosses the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and promotes astrocyte and neuronal swelling by increasing intracellular glutamine content and creating osmotic imbalance. Transported to the mitochondria, glutamine contributes to production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and activation of mitochondrial transition permeability pore and various kinases, resulting in cytotoxic swelling. Increased ammonia levels have been shown to alter cerebral blood flow and brain glucose utilization. , High arterial and brain levels of ammonia in ALF correlate well with cerebral edema and increased intracranial pressure (ICP), with consequent high risk of mortality from brain herniation and hypoxia.

Multiple other endogenous mediators have been implicated, including benzodiazepine- or γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)–like agonists and neurosteroids acting on GABA A receptors, ROS, inflammatory cytokines, hyponatremia, and manganese. Other evidence implicates neuroinflammation, including activation of microglia and proinflammatory cytokines and as a cause of altered permeability of the BBB leading to vasogenic edema and accumulation of ammonia in the brain. , , Low-grade brain edema, evident on advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, is associated with increased interstitial water caused by BBB breakdown and seems to be more common in chronic liver disease (CLD) than initially appreciated. ICP remains mostly normal in part because of the neuronal loss.

In cirrhosis, HE has a slow onset, a progressive course, and only partial responsiveness to therapy. Significant cerebral edema typically does not develop, and a precipitating event (e.g., infection, excessive dietary protein, dehydration, gastrointestinal [GI] bleeding) can be often identified. TIPS, a known risk factor, is associated with 30% of new or worsening encephalopathy. In addition to correction of any precipitating factors, treatment includes nonabsorbable disaccharides, which reduce the intestinal production and absorption of ammonia; antibiotics that target urease-producing bacteria; ornithine and acarbose; benzodiazepine receptor antagonists; and probiotics. Minocycline, an agent with potent central anti-inflammatory properties, reduces neuroinflammation, brain edema, and encephalopathy in liver failure, as does the anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent etanercept. The molecular absorbent recirculating system (MARS) and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) improve hemodynamics and grade of HE in ALF and acute-on-chronic liver failure, with TPE also improving survival in ALF, but more studies need to be done.

The hallmarks of HE in ALF are cerebral edema and increased ICP. Both are life-threatening complications of grade 3 and 4 encephalopathy. Treatment includes several general and specific interventions aimed at promoting cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) above 60 mm Hg ( Table 106.1 ); this is achieved by maintaining the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and reducing ICP to below 20 mm Hg by reducing brain edema. Grade 3 or 4 HE requires endotracheal intubation for airway protection. Mild hyperventilation temporarily relieves brain hyperemia, but prolonged hyperventilation is not beneficial and may cause CNS ischemia. Mannitol is effective in reducing ICP in the short term, but prophylactic use is not recommended. N-acetylcysteine treatment may also prolong transplant-free survival in ALF unrelated to paracetamol/acetaminophen toxicity. ,

TABLE 106.1
Management of Encephalopathy and Elevated Intracranial Pressure in Acute Liver Failure
GENERAL MEASURES SPECIFIC INTERVENTIONS
Head elevation to 30 degrees Endotracheal intubation for grades 3 and 4 hepatic encephalopathy
Judicious (restrictive) fluid management Hyperventilation: limited, temporary benefit
Judicious if any sedation N -acetylcysteine, if ALF is due to acetaminophen
Cerebral perfusion pressure > 60 mm Hg Renal replacement therapy: CVVHD
Osmotic diuresis, hypertonic saline ICP monitoring (>10% bleed); transcranial Doppler
Empiric: antibiotics, antivirals, disaccharides Hypothermia: mild, bridge to transplantation
ALF , Acute liver failure; CVVHD, Continuous venovenous hemodialysis; ICP, intracranial pressure.

The role of ICP monitoring is controversial because it is associated with a high risk of bleeding in this patient population and little data exist to support its role in improving patient outcomes. ICP monitoring has been recommended in ALF and comatose patients with computed tomography (CT) evidence of brain edema. A noninvasive alternative to ICP monitors is transcranial Doppler (TCD) sonography. By measuring blood flow velocities in middle and anterior cerebral arteries and calculating resistance and pulsatility indexes, TCD allows serial estimates of cerebral blood flow in the setting of impaired autoregulation and developing brain edema. In a small series of ALF patients, the feasibility of intraoperative TCD to assess main cerebrovascular hemodynamic parameters was recently demonstrated, but more studies are needed to ascertain the value of intraoperative TCD in OLT.

Mild to moderate hypothermia (32°C–35°C) reduces brain ammonia and cytokine levels and in part restores cerebrovascular autoregulation and brain glucose metabolism. Although experimental evidence provides a strong rationale, only limited clinical data on efficacy and safety of hypothermia in humans with ALF are available, and future studies are warranted. , ,

Cardiovascular system

Cardiovascular complications are responsible for the majority of nongraft morbidity and mortality in the early post-OLT period (see Chapter 111 ). Common clinical problems that impact postoperative outcomes include hyperdynamic circulation, CAD, and nonischemic cirrhotic cardiomyopathy.

Hyperdynamic circulation

Patients with ESLD develop high cardiac output state and systemic hypotension secondary to reduced systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and abnormal distribution of central, splanchnic, and peripheral circulation (i.e., the splanchnic steal). The compensatory mechanisms include activation of the sympathetic system and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis that may result in organ hypoperfusion such as kidney hypoperfusion. Importantly, the low SVR may mask compromised cardiac function because of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy that is common in ESLD and may progress to heart failure under the demands of liver transplant surgery. Understanding the pathophysiology of hyperdynamic circulation is critical to successful intraoperative management of OLT candidates (see Chapters 77 , 78 , and 105 ).

Coronary artery disease

Incidence of CAD in OLT candidates is reported in up to 37% of decompensated liver disease patients, with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) as a leading etiology. , Although historically, significant mortality and morbidity were reported in patients with CAD, revascularization and newer management strategies seem to allow for better outcomes. , Safadi and colleagues (2009) reported that history of stroke, CAD, postoperative sepsis, and increased interventricular septal thickness were markers of adverse perioperative cardiac outcomes, whereas use of perioperative β-blockers was significantly protective. Pretransplant troponin T, a sensitive troponin assay, has proved to be a strong predictor of post-transplant cardiovascular events.

National guidelines exist for cardiac evaluation of OLT candidates. Symptoms and functional capacity are not the key indicators for testing because exertional intolerance is a common feature of ESLD that may conceal cardiac pathology. Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is recommended as an initial screening test recognizing that it has low sensitivity and negative predictive value in ESLD patients. Cardiac catheterization is indicated if CAD cannot be confidently excluded. Left-sided heart catheterization is associated with higher risk of minor complications but can be performed safely in candidates for OLT.

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing with measurement of maximum aerobic capacity and ventilatory or aerobic threshold (e.g., the 6-minute walk test) can predict post-OLT outcomes. Although an attractive concept, this methodology is not widely adopted because it requires specialized equipment, staff training, and time. ,

Computed tomography (CT) detection of coronary calcification is a sign of possible ischemic heart disease in asymptomatic patients. Severe coronary calcification, indicated by a coronary calcium score greater than 400, predicted cardiovascular complications occurring within 1 month after OLT in a study by Kong et al. Stress cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) is suitable in OLT candidates because of its higher sensitivity and specificity for CAD then DSE, and inclusion of functional cardiac assessment and noncardiac imaging (liver MRI) in the same session.

Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy

Nonischemic cirrhotic cardiomyopathy is characterized by blunted systolic function and diastolic dysfunction, chronotropic incompetence, and electrophysiologic alterations, often manifesting as prolonged QTc interval. Diastolic dysfunction is associated with severity of the postreperfusion syndrome and development of post-transplant heart failure. Structural myocardial abnormalities, left atrial enlargement, and hypodynamic state ensue with progression of cirrhosis, independent of etiology.

Diagnosis is based primarily on advanced echocardiographic and radiologic imaging (e.g., myocardial performance index, MPI/Tei index; speckled echocardiography assessing global longitudinal strain; cardiac MRI), and elevated levels of brain natriuretic peptide.

Pathophysiologic hallmarks of nonischemic cardiomyopathy are down-regulation and desensitization of β-adrenergic receptors, myocardial fibrosis, myocyte hypertrophy, and ion-channel defects. Medical treatment is based on sodium restriction and administration of β-blockers and aldosterone antagonists; liver transplantation can reverse this condition. ,

Nonischemic cardiomyopathy can also manifest as a complication of the primary disease such as ethanol abuse, amyloidosis, hemochromatosis, and Wilson disease. When present, dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy rarely reverts to normal after OLT (see Chapters 77 , 78 , and 105 ).

Pulmonary system

As many as 70% of patients with CLD have respiratory problems, which manifest as impaired respiratory mechanics and gas exchange. Most pulmonary comorbidities are independent from liver disease, but for a few exceptions such as α 1 -antitrypsin deficiency and cystic fibrosis. Pulmonary evaluation includes history and physical examination, radiologic studies, arterial blood gases (ABGs), and pulmonary function tests. Right-sided heart catheterization is indicated when clinical or echocardiographic evidence suggests significant pulmonary hypertension.

Portopulmonary hypertension

Portopulmonary hypertension (PPH) is a specific type of pulmonary artery hypertension. It involves increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and portal hypertension with or without advanced liver disease. From 2% to 10% of patients with cirrhosis are affected by PPH. The physiologic mechanism is multifactorial and incompletely understood, but hyperdynamic circulation, imbalance between pulmonary vasodilators (nitric oxide and prostacyclin) and vasoconstrictors (endothelin-1 and thromboxane), and proliferative pulmonary arteriopathy all play a role in the genesis of this syndrome.

Diagnosis requires the presence of portal hypertension, mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) greater than 25 mm Hg, PVR greater than 240 dynes/sec/cm 5, and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure less than 15 mm Hg. Other causes of pulmonary hypertension (e.g., high flow state, volume overload, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) should be ruled out. Right-sided heart catheterization is indicated if right ventricular (RV) systolic pressure is higher than 50 mm Hg on echocardiography ; the severity of PPH is then classified as mild (mPAP 24–34 mm Hg), moderate (mPAP 35–44 mm Hg), or severe (mPAP ≥ 45 mm Hg) (see Chapters 77 , 78 , 79 , and 105 ).

Medical optimization is indicated before transplantation, and treatment is based on vasodilators that frequently have side effects that limit their applicability. Prostaglandins (intravenous [IV] epoprostenol or inhaled iloprost), phosphodiesterase inhibitors (sildenafil), and endothelin-1 antagonists (bosentan, macitentan) are often used in combination therapy. Most liver transplant centers do not transplant patients with an mPAP greater than 50 mm Hg or PVR greater than 240 dynes/sec/cm −5 . Current recommendations suggest offering OLT to recipients who respond to medical therapy and with mPAP of 35 mm Hg or less. , Post-OLT outcomes such as hospital length of stay (LOS) and 1-year survival were comparable in liver transplant (LT) recipients with normal mPAP and those with mPAP ranging between 35 to 50 mmHg after treatment.

Hepatopulmonary syndrome

Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) is a vascular disorder characterized by hypoxemia secondary to pulmonary capillary vasodilation (up to 100 μm) in patients with liver disease. The estimated incidence in patients with cirrhosis is between 5% and 30%. The natural course of HPS is characterized by poor survival, especially in patients with arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO 2 ) less than 50 mm Hg: median survival without LT is approximately 24 months. The pathologic feature of HPS is gross dilation and an increase in the number of the pulmonary precapillary and capillary vessels , leading to a ventilation-perfusion mismatch. The symptoms are platypnea and dyspnea, with or without orthodeoxia. Pulse oximetry (O 2 saturation less than 96%) is a useful screening test. The diagnosis is confirmed with ABGs (resting PaO 2 < 80 mm Hg or PA-aO 2 gradient >15 mm Hg, or 20 mm Hg in patients older than 65), contrast-enhanced echocardiography, or macroaggregated albumin lung perfusion scan. The echocardiographic signature is a positive bubble test with a delay of four to six beats indicating transpulmonary shunt. No effective medical therapy exists for HPS, and LT is the only treatment. Severe HPS (PaO 2 < 50 mm Hg on room air) is associated with increased perioperative mortality, complexity of peri-transplant management, but overall favorable long-term outcomes in survivors. , The 2016 International Liver Transplant Society Practice Guidelines recommend the following postoperative interventions: early extubation to minimize the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia; 100% oxygen administration to maintain O 2 saturation greater than 85%; avoidance of fluid overload; and inhaled nitric oxide to improve oxygenation (see Chapter 77, Chapter 78, Chapter 79 and 105 ).

Hepatic hydrothorax

Hepatic hydrothorax is defined as a pleural effusion greater than 500 mL not caused by cardiac or pulmonary diseases in a patient with cirrhosis. A diaphragmatic defect allowing passage of ascites from the peritoneal to the pleural cavity is considered the main mechanism leading to this complication. Pleural effusions are symptomatic in 5% to 10% of patients with ESLD, and the main respiratory impairment is hypoxemia secondary to atelectasis and shunting; chest radiograph confirms the diagnosis. Treatment is based on medical management of ascites with sodium restriction and diuretics, paracentesis, and possible placement of a TIPS. In cases of refractory hydrothorax, pleurodesis and diaphragmatic repair can be considered; thoracentesis is generally performed only in emergency situations because avoidance of tube thoracostomy is preferred. Chest tube placement should be avoided but use of a pleural catheter with intermittent decompression may stave off the need for hospitalization (see Chapter 77, Chapter 78, Chapter 79 and 105 ).

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and smoking

COPD is common and often undiagnosed in candidates for LT, except for patients with known α 1 -antitrypsin deficiency. In a prospective study involving several US academic centers, 18% of OLT candidates had COPD, and 80% of those patients had not been previously diagnosed. Older age and smoking were significant risk factors. The impact of moderate COPD on perioperative outcome in liver transplantation is not well defined. Severe COPD was found associated with a complicated postoperative course and worse long-term survival. A recent national observational study from Spain including 14,970 OLT recipients showed that COPD patients had significantly lower rates of infection and other complications, and lower in-hospital mortality than those without COPD (4.07% vs. 8.91%).

Hemostasis in end-stage liver disease

The traditional view that ESLD is a hypocoagulable state has been revised (see Chapters 77 and 78 ). The current concept emphasizes complex disturbances of procoagulant, anticoagulant, and fibrinolytic pathways and platelet function, that result in rebalancing of the hemostatic system. , The resulting fragile, rebalanced state can be easily tipped towards hypocoagulability and bleeding or towards hypercoagulability and thromboembolism. Importantly, the latter is still an often-underestimated risk in ESLD.

Understanding the hemostatic system in ESLD is essential to perioperative coagulation management and optimization of blood-product transfusion practices, which are related to morbidity and mortality in LT. , Deficiency in primary hemostasis is caused by quantitative and qualitative platelet changes. Mild to moderate thrombocytopenia is common. Causes are splenomegalic platelet sequestration in portal hypertension, impaired megakaryocytopoiesis from reduced production of thrombopoietin by the cirrhotic liver, folic acid deficiency in alcoholic cirrhosis or acute hepatitis C infection, and reduced platelet half-life related to autoantibodies. Evidence for impaired platelet aggregation and adhesion in cirrhosis is controversial. The proposed mechanisms are complex and multifactorial, including the role of two potent endothelium-derived platelet inhibitors, nitric oxide, and prostacyclin. More recent work suggests that the functional capacity of platelets in cirrhosis may be preserved, suggesting that the main defect in primary hemostasis is thrombocytopenia. A compensatory mechanism for the deficient platelet function in cirrhosis is an increase in endothelium-synthesized von Willebrand factor (vWF), because of deficiency in ADAMTS-13, a vWF cleaving protease that is reduced in cirrhosis. The upregulated vWF promotes adhesion of platelets to injured endothelium and may explain the poor correlation between platelet number and bleeding time. Thrombocytopenia, as low as 60 × 10 9 per liter, is sufficient to preserve thrombin generation at a level equivalent to the lower limit of normal.

The liver synthesizes all procoagulant factors except for vWF, which is synthesized by the endothelium. Factor VIII is synthesized by hepatocytes but also by nonhepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells. Reduced levels of coagulation factors are observed in acute and chronic liver disease. Several factors—II, VII, IX, and X—are vitamin K-dependent and exist in plasma as inactive precursors when vitamin K is deficient in decreased absorption (cholestasis) or antagonism (warfarin). In ALF, plasma concentrations of coagulation factors with the shortest half-life (factor VII, 4–6 hours; factor V, 12 hours) decrease first, followed by those with a longer half-life. Exceptions are factors VIII and vWF, which may be elevated in chronic and acute liver disease because of inflammatory cytokine-mediated upregulated extrahepatic production. Fibrinogen is usually well preserved: its decrease is a mark of advanced cirrhosis or ALF. Even when levels are normal, fibrinogen is often functionally aberrant because of impaired fibrin polymerization. The result is an abnormal thrombin time (TT), despite normal international normalized ratio (INR) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT).

The deficiency in procoagulant factors is, at least in part, offset by decreased production of anticoagulants, including proteins C and S, antithrombin, and heparin cofactor II. Proteins C and S are vitamin K dependent and may be deficient in cholestatic disease, and although genetic deficiency of these two proteins is rare, such deficiency is found in both Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein (PV) thrombosis. Antithrombin is synthesized by hepatocytes and endothelium, deficiencies are usually mild, and thromboembolic complications are rare.

All proteins involved in fibrinolysis are synthesized by the liver except tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1). Consequently, reduced levels of liver-synthesized factors—plasminogen, plasmin inhibitor, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI), and factor XIII—are found in both ALF and chronic liver failure. Cirrhosis is classically associated with hyperfibrinolysis, whereas patients in ALF may have hypofibrinolysis because of increased production of PAI-1. The expert viewpoint emphasizes that balance of profibrinolytic and antifibrinolytic factors in liver disease is often restored, and the role of hyperfibrinolysis in bleeding is limited. Increased levels of fibrinogen degradation indicators—d-dimers, plasmin-antiplasmin and thrombin-antithrombin complexes, thrombin fragment F1+2—could be explained by delayed clearance by the diseased liver. Coagulation tests, such as prothrombin time (PT) and activated PTT (aPTT) are used to assess the severity of synthetic dysfunction, and PT-INR is a part of the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) and MELD prognostic indexes. As tests of in vivo coagulation function, PT-INR and PTT are conceptually deficient because they measure only the procoagulant pathway and ignore the anticoagulant function. The seminal observation that thrombin generation in cirrhotic patients is close to normal may, in part, explain why PT-INR and PTT are poor predictors of bleeding in cirrhosis and liver transplantation. , Viscoelastic tests, thromboelastography (TEG, Haemonetics Corporation, Braintree, MA) and rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM; Pentapharm, Munich, Germany) have the advantage of assaying whole-blood clot formation and lysis, including the platelet contribution, but do not incorporate the endothelial component (see Intraoperative Monitoring, later). Importantly, these assays allow for easy recognition of hypercoagulable states ( Fig. 106.1 ).

FIGURE 106.1, Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in a patient with hepatopulmonary syndrome and intrapulmonary shunting demonstrates a positive bubble study.

Renal system

Renal failure confers increased risk of death to cirrhotic patients, both while on the waiting list and after LT. Even mild renal disease increases the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Implementation of the MELD score in 2002 has prioritized patients with renal failure waiting for a liver transplant, resulting in reduced overall mortality on the transplant list. Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a specific type of functional renal failure in patients with decompensated cirrhosis (see Chapters 77 and 78 ). It is marked by renal vasoconstriction and a severe reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR < 30 mL/min) but only minimal histologic abnormalities. , The primary pathophysiologic process is a circulatory disturbance: portal hypertension facilitates translocation of bacteria from the intestinal lumen into the mesenteric lymph nodes and induces production of inflammatory cytokines and local vasodilators, such as nitric oxide, carbon monoxide, and endogenous cannabinoids. Resulting splanchnic vasodilation decreases the overall SVR and activates several compensatory mechanisms. The initial response is hyperdynamic and includes tachycardia, increased cardiac output, low SVR, and hypotension. With progression of cirrhosis, sympathetic and renin-angiotensin vasoconstrictor systems are activated and temporarily maintain arterial blood pressure (BP), but they also cause renal vasoconstriction and hypoperfusion. Activation of nonosmotic hypersecretion of arginine vasopressin, aimed at preserving circulatory volume, results in retention of solute-free water with attendant hyponatremia, edema, and ascites. HRS is almost invariably associated with ascites and rarely develops in its absence. Onset of HRS is often triggered by a discrete event, such as spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or hypovolemia because of diuretic use, GI bleeding, or fluid losses. Recently, inflammation has emerged as an important determinant in the development of HRS. Until recently, serum creatinine (SCr) values above 1.5 mg/dL (133 μmol/L) were used to define renal insufficiency in cirrhosis. , In 2012 the definition of acute renal failure (ARF) was updated and replaced by acute kidney injury (AKI). AKI is a syndrome with multiple possible etiologies. In 2015 a revised definition of AKI in cirrhosis was proposed, with a new “dynamic” scoring system called International Club of Ascites (ICA)-AKI ; AKI is diagnosed by an increase in absolute SCr of more than 0.3 mg/dL or by a 1.5- to 2-fold increase from baseline. Three categories of increasing severity are defined by levels of SCr or initiation of renal replacement. In the presence of AKI, it is important to differentiate acute tubular necrosis (ATN) from the “classical” hepatorenal syndrome because the therapeutic approach is different, even if the two entities are currently considered a continuum. Vasoconstrictors (such as terlipressin) are not indicated for the treatment of ATN.

Measurement of SCr remains the primary test of renal function despite its well-known limitations. GFR and creatinine clearance are more accurate but less practical tests when repeated assessments are needed. Other tests measure serum and urinary electrolytes, fractional sodium excretion (FeNa), albumin, osmolarity, sediment, and biologic markers. No specific diagnostic test exists for HRS. Rather, diagnosis is based on the presence of liver disease, a precipitating factor, and FeNa less than 1%, signifying preserved tubular reabsorption; however, the latter test is invalidated in the presence of diuretics. Still, recent investigations have suggested that several urine biomarkers may have a diagnostic and prognostic value in cirrhotic patients with AKI. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), interleukin (IL)-18, and albumin appear particularly promising in cirrhotic patients. NGAL and IL-18 are associated with tubular renal injury, whereas albumin is associated with glomerular injury. More specifically, NGAL and IL-18 levels are much higher in patients with ATN than in those with HRS-AKI of prerenal, hypovolemia-induced AKI.

General treatment measures are aimed at preventing infection, in particular subacute bacterial peritonitis; maintaining adequate intravascular volume; and avoiding nephrotoxic agents. Circulatory volume losses, often the result of large-volume paracentesis or a GI bleed, are best treated with albumin or, if indicated, by blood products and not with crystalloids, to avoid retention of solute-free water. The main pharmacologic approach uses vasoconstrictors, including a selective vasopressin V1 receptor agonist (e.g., terlipressin) or α-adrenergic agonists (e.g., norepinephrine, midodrine). Vasoconstrictors in conjunction with albumin are only modestly beneficial but are the best medical therapy currently available. Placement of a TIPS improves renal function and GFR and reduces sympathetic and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis activation in about 60% of patients. No advantage in survival has been demonstrated in patients with refractory ascites treated by TIPS compared with repeated paracentesis and intravascular volume replacement with albumin. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) offers a bridge to transplant, but the optimal RRT method in HRS and the benefit to patient outcomes are not known. , Continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) seems to be hemodynamically the most favorable form of RRT. , CVVHD can be used to effectively control intravascular volume, pH levels, and solutes (Na, K, SCr, urea, ammonia). In addition, it corrects sodium in a time-controlled fashion, which is particularly relevant to minimize the risk of CNS demyelination in patients with hyponatremia. LT is the treatment of choice for patients with cirrhosis and HRS. About 90% of patients with HRS recover kidney function after successful LT. The remaining 10% do not recover their kidney function and require prolonged RRT and eventual kidney transplantation. Listing criteria for simultaneous liver and kidney transplant, based on OPTN guidelines, include factors such as duration of AKI and RRT and evidence of CKD.

Enhanced recovery protocols

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), first published in colorectal surgery, pertains to a highly coordinated, multidisciplinary surgical patient care continuum, driven by evidence-based protocols and best practices (see Chapter 27 ). The continuum spans from preoperative medical and nutritional optimization, prehabilitation to offset frailty, and standardization of intraoperative surgical and anesthetic care to postoperative care, including analgesia, early removal of drains and tubes, early mobilization, and rehabilitation. Benefits of ERAS pathways are well documented in several surgical specialties and include improved outcomes and patient satisfaction and reduced LOS and cost. Most transplant centers have well-developed protocols that incorporate individual ERAS elements (e.g., the use of regional techniques for analgesia), but published evidence of a comprehensive ERAS program in LT is limited. , A small single-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated decreased blood loss and transfusion requirements and another small pilot study demonstrated a decrease in ICU and hospital stay with no other outcome differences. It is increasingly recognized that the concept of ERAS has been applied safely and effectively across surgical subspecialties and that it should be adopted in OLT through center-specific standardization of care.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here