Interventional management of the patent ductus arteriosus


Key points

  • Percutaneous (or transcatheter) PDA closure is an emerging technique that has gained popularity in the most recent years and is being performed in progressively smaller and younger patients. Advancements in the technique, the launch of devices that are more appropriate for the preterm ductal morphology, and increased experience have expanded the use of percutaneous closure with high rates of technical success and few major adverse events.

  • Post-closure cardiorespiratory instability is characterized by oxygenation and/or ventilation failure and systolic hypotension with or without the need for inotropes. The onset of symptoms is typically 6–12 hours post-closure, is common in preterm infants, and is likely related to increased left ventricular afterload.

  • Early targeted administration of intravenous milrinone to preterm infants with low cardiac output in the immediate post-closure period may ameliorate symptoms of post-closure cardiorespiratory instability.

  • Respiratory instability is likely secondary to increased LV filling pressures and pulmonary venous hypertension, which may be secondary to ventricular stiffening and myocardium properties related to diastolic function.

Introduction

The decision for definitive closure of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) remains one of the biggest controversies in neonatology. Importantly, there is marked center-to-center variation in the incidence of ligation among extremely-low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants, and overall rates of surgical ligation reported by international neonatal networks are decreasing. , The reasons behind this secular trend are likely multifactorial, but in many centers surgical ligation is being substituted, and even superseded, by the practice of percutaneous closure. Percutaneous (or transcatheter) PDA closure is an emerging technique that has gained popularity in the most recent years and is being performed in progressively smaller and younger patients. Advancements in the technique with decreased fluoroscopy time, venous retrograde approach, the launch of devices that are more appropriate for the preterm ductal morphology, and increased experience have expanded the use of percutaneous closure, with high rates of technical success and few major adverse events.

Observational studies have associated PDA surgery with adverse neonatal outcomes and neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) in early childhood, although bias due to residual confounding threatens the validity of these studies. Infants treated with surgical ligation undergo major rapid changes in systemic hemodynamics, which commonly lead to postoperative cardiorespiratory instability. In addition, given that dependence on mechanical ventilation is the sine qua non of referring an infant for definitive PDA closure, the increasing availability and use of advanced noninvasive methods of ventilation may permit earlier endotracheal extubation of extremely preterm infants. Consequently, clinician perceptions of the merits of a definitive intervention may differ, prompting them to avoid interventional PDA closure, with the hope of spontaneous ductal closure.

It’s important to note though that, specifically in ELBW, the rate of spontaneous closure is poor; more than 50% of infants born <750 g still have a PDA around day 50. Additionally, the impact of chronic pulmonary overcirculation on the pulmonary parenchyma and on pulmonary vasculature remodeling must be appreciated. Despite several controversies in the literature regarding the impact of PDA closure on different neonatal outcomes, there is increasing evidence of a correlation between prolonged shunt exposure and the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Although the TIPP trial showed no decrease in the incidence of BPD with the use of prophylactic indomethacin, one recent study reported that a change toward a strict nonintervention approach to PDA resulted in an absolute increase of 31% in BPD in infants born less than 26 weeks. Prolonged exposure to shunts also has a detrimental impact on pulmonary vascular development, and the presence of an untreated large PDA in the first 2 years of life may result in pulmonary vascular disease in as many as 50% of patients. , Philip et al. demonstrated that exposure to a PDA beyond 8 weeks of life is associated with an elevation in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) index, greater respiratory severity score, and prolonged use of mechanical ventilation. In preterm infants, who have a smaller cross-sectional area of pulmonary vessels and several other inflammatory risk factors, the elevation in PVR occurs more frequently and at an earlier age, , , while prolonged PDA exposure is also a potential contributor in the development of pulmonary vein stenosis. Figure 18.1 summarizes the multiple contributors to the pathophysiology of PDA shunt-related pulmonary hypertension.

Fig. 18.1, Different contributors of pulmonary hypertension in the setting of patent ductus arteriosus shunt.

Although the risks of prolonged shunts are relatively well established, the timing and indication for definitive closure have not been rigorously evaluated. Simultaneously, although the percutaneous approach is deemed to be less invasive and with less adverse events, the evidence regarding appropriate timing and indication for referral remain unknown. As a result, contemporary practice is dominated by considerable uncertainty regarding the role of definitive closure. In this chapter we review the evidence regarding the benefits and risks of PDA interventional closure in very preterm neonates and provide a pathophysiology-based management paradigm to guide peri-closure care in these high-risk infants.

Definitive PDA closure: Timing, patient selection, and staging

In contemporary practice the “definitive PDA closure decision” remains an enduring controversy for clinicians. There is currently a paucity of knowledge regarding the clinical and echocardiography characteristics of infants with persistent PDA who may benefit from definitive closure. The relative risks and benefits of interventional closure compared with conservative management are unknown. Although dependence on mechanical ventilation remains the primary criterion for definitive closure referral, the relative independent contribution of the PDA to ongoing respiratory insufficiency is, at present, difficult to quantify. Infants with similar echocardiography indices of PDA hemodynamic significance may have varying degrees of respiratory failure (none to severe) owing to differences in nascent lung disease of prematurity, pulmonary arterial pressure, and tolerance of the increased pulmonary blood flow from the ductal shunt.

Limited evidence from clinical trials and careful reflection on contemporary treatment practices provides some boundaries for surgical treatment, mostly by limiting the use of ligation in the first postnatal week. Although the trial by Cassady et al. reported reduced necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) rates with prophylactic surgical ligation on the first postnatal day in ELBW infants, several factors render this practice now untenable. First , prophylactic indomethacin has both relatively high efficacy for early closure and reduces all grades of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), providing a therapeutic alternative with additional benefit. Second , early PDA ligation may result in increased right ventricular (RV) afterload, so early ligation may be harmful in preterm infants with increased pulmonary artery pressure, a common finding in severe respiratory distress syndrome. Finally , the natural history of ductal closure has been described, with many infants experiencing early spontaneous closure. Exposing all infants to the risks of interventional closure is therefore inappropriate.

Persistent ductal shunt may be considered a chronic, consistent contributor to impaired pulmonary compliance. Infants with a persistent PDA may be considered for interventional closure when the clinical and echocardiography evaluations identify a shunt of sufficient volume that may be actively contributing to respiratory insufficiency. Echocardiography markers of ductal significance may include measurements of left heart volume loading (i.e., pulmonary vein D wave velocity, mitral E wave velocity, left atrium to aorta ratio and isovolumic relaxation time), estimates of Qp:Qs (left-to-right ventricular output ratio) and of systemic hypoperfusion (diastolic flow reversal in the descending aorta and/or systemic vessels such as celiac and middle cerebral artery). , Persistent dependence on invasive or noninvasive ventilation in combination with moderate-severe echocardiography indicators of hemodynamic significance suggests an impaired ability to compensate for the ductal shunt. It is, however, important to consider preterm infants who have clinical features of chronic end-organ hypoperfusion (systemic hypotension, renal failure, feeding intolerance) in the absence of an acute etiology (e.g., sepsis, NEC) accompanied by echocardiographic indices of a large ductal shunt. In these infants echocardiography indices are often in the “severe” range across all parameters, although there are little data regarding the direct clinical relevance of these deviations from normal. Early interventional closure after failure of medical therapy may be indicated for this subgroup of infants as well as a strategy to prevent BPD and pulmonary vascular remodeling in the most immature high-risk patients.

Impact of definitive PDA closure

Surgical PDA ligation and outcomes

The clinical decision to treat a preterm neonate with surgical PDA ligation is controversial, owing to uncertainty regarding the impact of PDA surgery on neonatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes. A limited number of randomized clinical trials, all conducted more than 3 decades ago, have evaluated the impact of surgical ligation in preterm infants on neonatal outcomes. A common salient feature of these studies is a lack of external validity to permit their interpretation within modern neonatal intensive care; these trials were either performed prior to the availability of pharmacological PDA treatment, identified “hemodynamically significant” PDA based on clinical exam rather than echocardiography, and/or enrolled relatively mature preterm neonates, and thus bear minimal resemblance to care provided to the micropremature neonates being considered for PDA surgery in contemporary practice.

In lieu, observational studies have contributed most prominently to the evidence of the potential effect of PDA ligation on clinical outcomes. Large retrospective cohort studies have associated PDA ligation with increased neonatal morbidity and NDI in early childhood. A meta-analysis of randomized trials and adjusted observational studies demonstrated that, compared with medically treated infants, ligated infants were more likely to develop moderate-severe BPD, severe retinopathy of prematurity, and moderate-severe NDI, although with improved survival. In light of concerns regarding NDI and neonatal morbidities, the safety of PDA ligation has been questioned. These concerns have been associated with a secular trend toward a reduction in infants being treated with surgical ligation in North American centers. ,

However, residual confounding bias threatens the validity of observational studies that have associated PDA ligation with increased neonatal morbidity and NDI compared with medical management alone. Most studies only adjusted for antenatal and perinatal confounders (e.g., gestational age). Because ligation typically occurs several weeks after birth, such studies likely inadequately addressed confounding by indication – those infants referred for ligation may have been more “ill” and/or have larger ductal shunts at the time of the decision to treat with surgery, compared with infants who are treated with medical management alone. Illness severity, characterized by postnatal pre-ligation morbidities such as intraventricular hemorrhage and sepsis, and intensive care parameters such as dependence on mechanical ventilation, are important confounders as they are associated with both the decision to treat with PDA ligation and also with neonatal morbidity and NDI. The potential effect of residual confounding bias in past studies was highlighted in a recent large multicenter cohort study of extremely preterm neonates with PDA, where after adjustment for postnatal pre-ligation confounders, ligation was no longer associated with adverse outcomes. These findings have direct clinical relevance; specifically, neonatologists and pediatric cardiac surgeons may now consider to no longer prioritize the risk of adverse neonatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes as a reason to avoid surgical PDA ligation.

Percutaneous PDA closure and outcomes

Improving risk/benefit profiles

Traditionally, technical success in percutaneous PDA closure is defined as placement of the device in the catheterization laboratory. Alternatively, technical failure is defined as the inability to place a device (or device placement, but subsequent need for removal due to malposition). In a meta-analysis that synthesized studies (1994–2016), 635 infants <6 kg undergoing percutaneous PDA closure were identified. Among that cohort, the authors observed a technical success rate of 92% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.8–95.0]; rates of any complications and clinically significant complications were 23.3% (95% CI 6.5–30.8) and 10.1% (95% CI 7.8–12.5), respectively. Using similar definitions, a more contemporary meta-analysis (2021) from Bischoff et al. investigated the technical success and safety profile of percutaneous closure among 373 infants <1.5 kg. Interestingly, the authors observed procedural success rates of 96% (95% CI 93–98%), while rates of any complications and clinically significant complications were 27% (95% CI 17–38%) and 8% (95% CI 5–10%), respectively. To further increase rates of technical success and minimize adverse events, a leadership panel of pediatric interventional cardiologists recently published consensus-based guidelines that address pre-, intra-, and post-procedural considerations of percutaneous PDA closure in lower-weight infants. Thus risk-benefit profiles for the procedure are expected to continue to improve over the next decade. However, in the absence of direct comparison of percutaneous closure versus alternative treatments, available risk/benefit profiles for the procedure lack the requisite context to guide evidence-based clinical practice.

Novel percutaneous PDA closure devices

Despite high rates of technical success with “off-label” use of various devices, , , the need for percutaneous PDA closure devices that address the unique ductal morphology and profile of preterm infants was clear. , Accordingly, over the past decade, in the spirit of collaboration and innovation, the pediatric cardiology community and private industry have partnered to design PDA closure devices specifically tailored for the preterm infant. , For example, the Amplatzer Piccolo Occluder was modified (short-length, low-profile delivery system) to make it suitable for use in preterm infants. In fact, following successful execution of a multicenter, non-randomized clinical trial, the Amplatzer Piccolo Occluder (or Amplatzer Duct Occluder II Additional Sizes, ADO-II AS; Abbott, Chicago, Illinois) was approved (2019) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for percutaneous PDA closure in preterm infants >3 postnatal days and weighing >700 g. , Of note, the Amplatzer Piccolo Occluder is FDA approved for PDAs ≤4 mm in diameter; thus off-label use of alternative devices remains common. For example, leading investigators recently reported that the Microvascular Plug 7Q is safe and feasible among premature infants with PDAs >4 mm in diameter. Although the ductus in preterm infants is typically long and tubular, marked variability in ductal length demands that a variety of device modalities be available. , In the absence of comparative studies the optimal device to close the PDA remains at the discretion of the interventional cardiologist and various institution and individual providers.

Treatments for definitive ductal closure

Surgical PDA ligation via thoracotomy was the traditional method of procedural PDA closure. However, over the last 2 decades, associations between surgical ligation and adverse outcomes, including neurodevelopmental delays, have emerged. , These observations have led to growing interest among the pediatric health care community in percutaneous PDA closure as a treatment to achieve definitive ductal closure. A recent study using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database compared short-term outcomes among infants undergoing definitive ductal closure, including percutaneous ( n = 175) or surgical PDA closure. Although infants undergoing percutaneous ductal closure were older (0.53 vs. 0.1 years, P < 0.001) and less premature (20% vs. 60%; P <0.001), the authors observed that those undergoing percutaneous closure had lower mortality (0% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.02) and reduced hospital length of stay (difference in 3 days; 95% CI 1.1–4.9 days; P = 0.002) than those undergoing surgical ligation. Other investigators have observed similar rates of safety and feasibility between percutaneous PDA closure versus surgical ligation. In the absence of contemporary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing percutaneous closure versus surgical ligation, fundamental questions on the best approach to achieve definitive ductal closure will remain unanswered.

Fundamental need for contemporary randomized controlled trial

In view of the lack of comparative data, a multidisciplinary leadership panel convened and developed research priorities for the use of percutaneous PDA closure. , The need for a multicenter RCT of percutaneous PDA closure, with well-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria, rigorously applied treatment protocols, consideration of potentially harmful exposures (e.g., cardiac anesthesia), and longer-term neurodevelopmental assessments, was emphasized. Consistent with US trends in surgical PDA ligation rates, the panel did not have interest or equipoise for a comparison of percutaneous closure versus surgical ligation. In fact, in view of widespread acceptance in the health care community, conservative management (“watchful waiting,” diuretics, fluid restriction) was determined to be the best comparative treatment modality. Following iterative discussions, an National Institute of Health (NIH)–funded study comparing percutaneous PDA closure versus conservative treatment (“PIVOTAL: Percutaneous Intervention Versus Observational Trial of Arterial Ductus in Lower Gestational Age Infants”) is planned to begin recruitment in 2023 (NCT #03982342).

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here