How Does One Approach the Patient With an Opioid Use Disorder?


Introduction and Scope of the Problem

Distinguishing between patients with the disease of addiction and patients with pain is an increasing dilemma among clinicians caring for patients taking opioids. However this distinction in patients receiving prescribed opioids may be challenging given shared pathophysiology and may not actually impact approaches to management. The two conditions often intersect, with each increasing vulnerability to and complicating treatment of the other, and thus opioid use disorders (OUDs) are now recognized to exist along a continuum from occasional misuse to severe addiction. With the high morbidity and mortality of the overdose epidemic, the prevalence of addiction in U.S. communities, and ongoing gaps in OUD treatment availability, safely navigating the management of pain has become even more complex. This is especially true in the era of early palliative care and concurrent advancements in cancer treatment, which have resulted in palliative care teams being asked to care for more people with chronic pain predating serious illness, chronic cancer-related pain in survivorship, pain related to nonmalignant serious illnesses, and increased risks of long-term opioid use including OUD. A knowledgeable approach to the patient with OUD has become an essential skill in modern palliative care practice. This chapter provides a brief overview of OUD and established treatments, discusses approaches to patients with OUD and palliative care needs, and describes how to develop a pain treatment plan by assessing and balancing pain, prognosis, and properties of the patient’s OUD.

Opioid Use Disorder

Addiction is a chronic, primary disease of the brain, influenced by genetics and environment, with cycles of relapse and remission, and manifests as a compulsive drive to use a substance despite harmful consequences. About 2 million Americans have an OUD, including 1.7 million persons with prescription pain reliever use disorder, contributing to 72,000 deaths from accidental overdose and becoming the leading cause of death for Americans under the age of 50 before the COVID-19 pandemic. Advances in neurobiology, genetics, and brain imaging have deepened our understanding of how normal brain functions in processing reward, emotional memories, motivation, and decision making become maladapted in addiction. Drugs of addiction elicit and enhance the rewarding, pleasurable response of dopamine manifold over natural rewards (e.g., eating a donut or having sex), and increasing amounts of the drug are required over time just to feel “normal” as the brain adapts to these disruptions. Addiction is a highly treatable, though incurable, chronic disease (like diabetes), with recovery in brain function and behavior after prolonged abstinence.

A diagnosis of mild, moderate, or severe OUD is made using the DSM-5 when at least two criteria are met over 12 months ( Table 12.1 ). Notably, the DSM-5 recognizes tolerance and dependence as natural physiological adaptations for any person with consistent opioid exposure. Therefore tolerance and dependence alone in a patient on long-term opioids taking their medication as directed do not satisfy criteria for OUD. The 4 Cs of addiction (Craving, lack of Control, Consequences, Compulsive use) is a mnemonic to simplify DSM-5 criteria.

Table 12.1
DSM-5 Criteria for Diagnosing Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
4 Cs DSM-5 Criteria Example Thoughts or Observed Behaviors
Craving Strong desire or urge to use an opioid “I couldn’t think of anything else besides using;” reluctance to meaningfully discuss treatments other than opioids; little interest in other modalities
Control (lack of) Use of an opioid in increased amounts or longer than intended “I didn’t mean to start using so much;” repeated requests for early refills; inability to ration medication supply, emergency room visits for running out early
Persistent wish or unsuccessful effort to cut down or control opioid use “I’ve tried to stop a few times before, but I start using again every time;” unable to taper opioids despite safety or family concern
Excessive time spent to obtain, use, or recover from opioid use “Everything I do revolves around using this drug;” spending time going to different clinics or pharmacies to obtain opioids
Consequences Interference of opioid use with important obligations or roles “I keep having trouble at work/have lost the trust of friends and family because of using this drug;” poor job/school performance; decline in home/social function
Continued opioid use despite problems socially, interpersonally (e.g., interference with work), or both “I can’t stop using, even though it’s causing problems with my friends/family/boss/landlord/the law;” family reports of patient falling asleep at the dinner table or losing thread of conversation
Elimination or reduction of important activities because of opioid use “I’ve stopped seeing my friends and family and have given up my favorite hobby because of drugs;” no longer active in sports/leisure activities
Compulsive use Use of an opioid in physically hazardous situations “I keep doing things that I know are risky and dangerous to buy or use this drug;” repeatedly driving under the influence
Continued opioid use despite resultant physical problems, psychological problems, or both “I know that using this drug causes me to feel bad/think differently, but I still use it anyway;” insistence to continue opioids despite significant sedation
Tolerance a Need for increased opioid doses for effect, reduced effect per dose, or both “I have to take more and more of the drug to feel the same”
Dependence a Withdrawal symptoms when dose of an opioid is decreased, using drug to relieve withdrawal, or both “When I stop using the drug, I get worse sleep, mood, pain, diarrhea”
Table outlines DSM-5 criteria for diagnosing an opioid use disorder (OUD). If ≥ 2 criteria/12 months, patient is diagnosed with an OUD with severity as follows: Mild 2–3, Moderate 4–5, Severe 6+.

a If an opioid is taken only as prescribed in treatment, this item does not count toward a diagnosis of an OUD.

Opioid/Medication Misuse

Some patients in palliative care may have higher risk behavior while taking opioids, or “misuse” behaviors, that do not clearly satisfy DSM-5 criteria for an OUD. The CDC refers to medication misuse as “the use of drugs or medications in a manner other than as directed by a doctor, such as use in greater amounts, more often, or longer than told to take a drug, or using someone else’s prescription.” In the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 9.9 million people reported past-year misuse of prescription opioids, with 63.6% reporting physical pain as the driver for misuse.

Summary of Evidence Regarding Treatment Recommendations

A systematic approach to concerning opioid use can inform both the differential for observed behaviors as well as management options. One expert consensus approach to conceptualizing opioid misuse starts with having additional patient-centered conversations to determine if patterns of behavior are present, reviewing the opioid treatment agreement and risks and benefits of opioids, and establishing the presence of a substance use disorder (SUD). While a firm OUD diagnosis may be difficult to establish initially for some patients on chronic opioids, primary addiction medicine skills in palliative care include applying the DSM-5 criteria to misuse behaviors before making decisions to taper or stop opioid therapy or refer patients to addiction specialists.

When meeting a patient with OUD, one must first be aware that addiction has been highly stigmatized, both by health care providers and by patients themselves. Stigma correlates with worse mental and physical health for people who use drugs and further erodes patient confidence that OUD is a treatable condition. Approaching patients with a willingness to openly discuss drug use and treat it as a medical issue normalizes it and allows people to speak more freely. A trauma-informed approach respects the common experience of trauma among people with OUD, and starts by asking permission to address the topic. Table 12.2 lists people-first, medically accurate, and stereotype-reducing language that helps dispel stigma—for example, describing a “person with a substance use disorder” rather than a “substance abuser” or “addict.”

Table 12.2
Language Matters: The “Addictionary”
Preferred Language Stigmatizing Language
Substance use disorder (SUD), opioid use disorder (OUD), addiction, risky use, misuse Substance abuse, drug problem, drug abuse, chemical coping
Addiction is a chronic disease of the brain that causes compulsive substance use despite harmful consequences Addiction is a choice, moral failing, lack of control, or personal failure
Person with a substance use disorder, person with an addiction, person who uses intravenous drugs Addict, former addict, drug/substance abuser, person with a drug habit, alcoholic, IVDU (intravenous drug user), drug seeker
Not actively using, person in recovery, abstinent Clean, “sober” may be used by patients but generally not used by clinicians
Substance present/not present in urine Dirty/clean/positive or negative urine
Medication for addiction treatment (MAT), opioid agonist therapy (OAT), medications for OUD (MOUD) Medication “assisted” treatment (MAT), opioid replacement therapy, opioid substitution
Table outlines both preferred language and stigmatizing language to avoid in conversations with patients and colleagues about opioid use or substance use disorders. Data from: Schuckit MA. Treatment of opioid-use disorders; N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):357–68; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Medications for opioid use disorder. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 63. Publication No. PEP20-02-01-006. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2020; Crotty K, Freedman KI, Kampman KM. Executive summary of the focused update of the ASAM national practice guideline for the treatment of opioid use disorder. J Addict Med. 2020 Apr;14(2):99–112; Chou R, Cruciani RA, Fiellin DA, et al. Methadone safety: a clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society and College on Problems of Drug Dependence, in collaboration with the Heart Rhythm Society. J Pain. 2014 Apr 1;15(4):321–37. Adapted from: Kelly JF, Dow SJ, Westerhoff C. Does our choice of substance-related terms influence perceptions of treatment need? An empirical investigation with two commonly used terms. J Drug Issues. 2010;40(4):805–18; Botticelli MP, Koh HK. Changing the language of addiction. JAMA. 2016 Oct 4;316(13):1361–2.

Other less-favorable terms include referring to concerning use of opioids related to undertreated pain as “pseudoaddiction” or to emotional distress as “chemical coping.” Such terms are highly subject to bias and lack clear definitions but allude to clinical diagnoses like OUD which have evidence-based treatment. While some may see these terms along the spectrum of OUD, it is more clinically useful to deliberately diagnose an OUD, or to name the undertreated pain and underlying total pain, to guide patients to appropriate treatments for each.

Treatment of OUD

Medications for OUD (MOUD), including the opioids methadone and buprenorphine (referred to as opioid agonist treatment [OAT]), undeniably save lives, reduce drug use, and diminish human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus transmission. OAT does not include the MOUD naltrexone, an opioid antagonist. OAT suppresses cravings for opioids and reduces the reinforcing cycle of euphoria–withdrawal that drives ongoing drug use, which allows the faulty reward pathways of addiction to reestablish homeostasis, restore emotional and decision-making capacity, and improve health and situational stability. Detoxification alone is not OUD treatment, as it is associated with both greater mortality and lower treatment retention compared to MOUD.

MOUD in the United States includes methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone. Despite the widely documented effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT), it remains a Schedule II drug with federal regulations limiting its use as MOUD to approved outpatient treatment programs (OTPs), which exacerbates a treatment gap of nearly 1 million people with OUD without treatment. The FDA approved buprenorphine as a Schedule III drug in 2002 and federal policies allowing certified (the “X-waiver”) physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants the ability to prescribe buprenorphine brought treatment of OUD into office-based settings. However, as of 2023 the X-waiver is no longer required for buprenorphine prescribing, such that all practitioners with a DEA registration that includes schedule III authority can prescribe buprenorphine for OUD. The educational training is still required to prescribe for more than 30 patients at once. Naltrexone blocks the euphoric and analgesic effect of opioids, but is not widely used as MOUD given less efficacy and adherence, and will have rare use in palliative care as it precludes use of agonist opioids.

Given the context of practicing amid an overdose epidemic, and the fact that myriad referrals to specialty palliative care for complex pain management involve opioids, palliative care providers will benefit from (1) knowledge of MOUD ( Table 12.3 ) and (2) the ability to offer buprenorphine to select patients with pain, OUD/misuse, and life-limiting serious illness.

Table 12.3
Comparison of Opioid Agonist Therapies: Buprenorphine and Methadone
Buprenorphine Methadone
Patient goals Opioid agonist/maintenance treatment Opioid agonist/maintenance treatment
Opioid effect Partial agonist Full agonist
Available formulations approved for treatment of OUD a
  • Sublingual bupe/nal tablet (generic, Zubsolv)

  • Sublingual bupe/nal film (generic, Suboxone)

  • Buccal bupe/nal film (Bunavail)

  • Subdermal bupe implant (Probuphine) b

  • SQ ER bupe injection c (Sublocade)

Oral liquid most common
Precautions Severe liver impairment–CYP450 metabolism; risk of precipitated withdrawal during initiation; concurrent use of other CNS depressants (alcohol, benzodiazepines) can increase risk for respiratory depression d ; hypersensitivity, QTc prolongation has been observed in the setting of other risk factors Multiple drug–drug interactions with metabolism by CYP450; complex pharmacokinetics require careful monitoring; concurrent use of other CNS depressants (alcohol, benzodiazepines) can increase risk for respiratory depression d ; life-threatening QTc prolongation in the setting of other risk factors or medications
Contraindications Hypersensitivity ECG QTc >500 ms; hypercapnia; respiratory depression (e.g., severe COPD, severe OSA, etc.); hypersensitivity
Initiation and stabilization
  • 1.

    Traditional : stop opioid use for 5–7 d (short acting) or up to 10–14 d (long acting or fentanyl) before initiation, confirm ≥3 withdrawal symptoms and urine tox

  • 2.

    Microdosing : continue full agonist during bupe cross-titration; recommended approach in palliative care

  • Requires daily visits to methadone treatment program

  • Typical effective dose 60–100 mg/day; some treatment programs reward consistent behavior with take-home doses, though policies and amounts vary by state

Regulations and availability Schedule III; requires waiver to prescribe in office-based settings; used in OTP, inpatient settings Schedule II; can only be used in OTP or acute hospital setting, not in office-based practice; not visible on PMP
BUPE , Buprenorphine; CNS , central nervous system; COPD , chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CYP450 , cytochrome P450; ECG , electrocardiograph; ER , extended release; MOUD , medications for OUD; NAL , naltrexone; OSA , obstructive sleep apnea; OTP , outpatient treatment programs; OUD , opioid use disorder; PMP , prescription monitoring program; SQ , subcutaneous.

a Belbuca, buprenex, butrans, and buprenorphine are approved for chronic pain, not MOUD; no additional licensure required.

b Six-month implant requires certification and training in the Probuphine Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Program.

c SQ injections: require setting certification by the Sublocade REMS program; medication dispensed directly for administration.

d The 2017 Food and Drug Administration Drug Safety Communication does not recommend holding OAT to patients solely on the basis of their taking benzodiazepines, because untreated OUD can pose a greater risk of morbidity and mortality.

Buprenorphine

Sublingual (SL) buprenorphine is a tightly binding, mu-opioid receptor partial agonist with a long half-life that, when used as MOUD, reduces opioid cravings, opioid withdrawal, and the euphoric effects of nonmedical opioid use. Formulations that include buprenorphine and naloxone are preferred over buprenorphine alone in MOUD, as naloxone is intended to deter intravenous misuse and is otherwise inactive if taken sublingually as prescribed ( Table 12.4 ). SL buprenorphine has been used off-label to treat chronic pain in patients with higher analgesic dosing needs or higher risk for opioid misuse. Though buprenorphine no longer requires additional education, it is recommended that prescribers review training materials to expand their knowledge of OUD and use of buprenorphine in situations where suspicion for opioid misuse is high.

Table 12.4
Clinical Considerations to Treat Patients With OUD/Misuse in Palliative Care
I. Pain – acute, cancer-related, chronic, periprocedural, end-of-life pain, etc.
  • -

    Acute: goals are to offer pain relief, prevent opioid withdrawal, prevent relapse, and engage patient in care and opioid agonist therapy/treatment (reduce incidence of patients leaving before treatment completion or “Against Medical Advice”)

  • -

    Chronic: less clear benefit of opioids than in treatment of cancer-related and periprocedural pain; goal is to maximize function (5 As, PEG score); approach opioids through harms vs. benefits framework. Maximize nonopioid adjuvants and multimodal therapies.

  • -

    Periprocedural: overwhelming evidence supports continuation of methadone maintenance treatment and buprenorphine maintenance treatment.

II. Prognosis
  • -

    Shorter: short-acting opioids are more likely useful to relieve pain; more likely to prescribe opioids for chronic pain at end of life.

  • -

    Longer: increased consideration of adverse effects of long-term high-dose opioids. Maximize use of MOUD as long-acting analgesia options. Consider use of buprenorphine for ease of transition to primary care if serious illness is stable.

  • -

    Functional status: patients with impaired mobility/bedbound may be unable to participate in OTP.

III. Properties of Oud
  • Severity:

  • -

    Concerning opioid use that does not fully meet OUD criteria: consider trial of buprenorphine as analgesia and increase visit frequency/support to see if higher risk behaviors change.

  • -

    Mild: consider prescribing buprenorphine for analgesia.

  • -

    Moderate or Severe: refer/collaborate with addiction specialist for evaluation and treatment. Opioids are not absolutely contraindicated by history of OUD. Consider buprenorphine.

  • Current OUD status:

  • Active: refer/collaborate with addiction specialists, connect with MOUD. If the patient is unwilling to see other providers initially or is at risk for loss to follow-up, a harm reduction approach may consider prescribing buprenorphine or methadone for pain to reduce risk of using nonprescribed opioids for pain relief. Plan to collaborate with addiction care/mental health to connect this patient. Prescribe naloxone. Goals are to engage the patient in care, minimize harm, and connect to addiction care or mental health.

  • Early remission (3–12 mo): loss of supports in OTP may be destabilizing; assess patient’s worries about potential use of opioids for pain, reassure ongoing care and treatment of pain. Verify recovery systems, elicit motivation for ongoing recovery, and identify past and potential future triggers for returning to use. Offer MOUD first or maximize effect if opioid analgesia is indicated. Ask patient about self-identified red flags of potential OUD relapse.

  • Stable remission (≥12 mo): same as above.

5 As: a scale to determine pain interference with function that measures activity, analgesia, adverse effects, aberrant behaviors, and affect changes.
PEG score: a scale to measure pain interference with function, which includes assessing pain intensity, interference with enjoyment of life, and general function.
MOUD , Medications for OUD; OUD , opioid use disorder; OTP , opioid treatment program.Data from References: 1,24,96,115,135,162,163.

Buprenorphine has two unique properties: it acts as a partial agonist at the mu-opioid receptor and has a high affinity for the receptor with a long half-life of 24 to 60 hours, facilitating its use as MOUD. The partial agonism means that in contrast to full agonists, increasing beyond moderate doses of buprenorphine typically does not result in greater opioid effects on respiratory depression and sedation. Buprenorphine also outcompetes other opioids with lower affinity (e.g., heroin, oxycodone) from binding, thereby blunting the effects of other opioids on euphoria and offering partial protection from accidental overdose. Despite this high affinity, treating pain is possible and will be discussed later in this chapter. Buprenorphine has an analgesic half-life of 6 to 8 hours, has wide individual variation in pharmacokinetics, is excreted in the urine, is extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP450) in the liver, and generally has fewer drug–drug interactions than methadone.

Precipitated Withdrawal and Initiation

Rotation to buprenorphine for a patient on full agonist requires forethought to account for either a washout period from the prior full agonist, or a planned timeline for administration of microdoses (explained shortly). If buprenorphine is introduced when opioid receptors are occupied by full agonists, buprenorphine will outcompete the full agonist to exert a partial opioid effect, with the resultant shift from full opioid effect to partial opioid effect manifesting as opioid withdrawal. This precipitated withdrawal can be treated by reducing the relative opioid deficit (i.e., adding more buprenorphine), or by pausing initiation and using non-opioid “comfort medications” to alleviate withdrawal symptoms. These include acetaminophen and NSAIDS, antidiarrheal agents, antiemetics, and clonidine or quetiapine for anxiety and agitation.

Buprenorphine is increasingly initiated at home (rather than in-office or inpatient) by (1) a traditional regimen that instructs patients to stop full agonist opioids and enter opioid withdrawal prior to initiation, or (2) a microdosing regimen with gradual cross-taper of full agonist and buprenorphine. Microdosing introduces buprenorphine at very small doses with monitored frequency to minimize shifts in opioid effect until a steady concentration is established. Multiple microdosing regimens have been described, and it is our recommended approach for most patients in palliative care where withdrawal from full agonist would likely cause great distress.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here