FLAP CLASSIFICATION AND DESIGN

INTRODUCTION

The author defines a local cutaneous flap as an area of skin and subcutaneous tissue with a direct vascular supply that is transferred from its in situ position to a site located immediately adjacent to or near the flap. This is in contrast to a graft, which is tissue that is moved from one site to another without a direct vascular supply immediately re-established. Optimal wound repair requires an understanding of the physiology and biomechanics of cutaneous flaps. These topics are discussed in detail in other chapters of this book, but key concepts will be reviewed here. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce the terminology used in this textbook and to provide a classification of local cutaneous flaps. A discussion of flap design and the author’s preferred flap for a given location is also included.

TERMINOLOGY

The primary defect is the wound to be closed by a local cutaneous flap. In this book, the majority of wounds shown have resulted from employing the micrographic (Mohs) surgical techniques to remove skin cancer. A secondary defect is the wound created when a skin flap is transferred to repair the primary defect ( Fig. 6.1 ). The transfer of every cutaneous flap from its in situ position results in a secondary defect. The challenge of reconstructive surgery is to design a flap that places the secondary defect in the most advantageous location. This usually translates into harvesting the flap from areas of the face and neck that have greater skin laxity.

When a skin flap is transferred to a defect, the motion of the flap is considered the primary tissue movement of the repair. This usually occurs by sliding or pivoting of tissue. Secondary tissue movement is the displacement of skin surrounding the defect toward the center of the primary defect. The vector of movement is typically in the opposite direction of the vector of movement of the flap. By necessity, there is also skin movement toward the donor site of the flap to close the secondary defect. Therefore a combination of primary and secondary tissue movement occurs when repairing a wound with a skin flap ( Fig. 6.2 ). In a region where a primary defect is adjacent to a mobile facial structure, secondary tissue movement may result in distortion of these structures. Facial structures that have visible margins such as the eyelids, lips, and nostrils are particularly susceptible to distortion by secondary tissue movement. The stronger the attachments of facial structures to the underlying bone, the less propensity for distortion. For example, the earlobe is more likely to be deformed by secondary tissue movement than the tragus.

Wound closure tension is the amount of stress (per unit area) along the suture line of a repaired wound. This tension is dependent on the vector forces of the tissue involved with primary and secondary movement. The greater the wound closure tension, the more likely it is that there will be distortion of facial features resulting from secondary tissue movement. It is therefore important to understand primary and secondary tissue movement when designing cutaneous flaps.

In part, the degree of wound closure tension is related to skin extensibility. Skin extensibility is the lengthening of skin under tension because of the stretching of elastic fibers. There are directional variations in skin extensibility. That is, skin is more extensible when the vector of strain is in a certain direction. For this reason, it is advantageous to recruit skin for repair of a wound in areas of maximum skin extensibility. These areas are identified by the lines of maximum extensibility (LME).

Relaxed skin tension lines (RSTLs) are intrinsic to facial skin. RSTLs result from orientation of collagen fibers of the skin and are manifested in the aging face as skin creases and wrinkles ( Fig. 6.3 ). RSTLs are perpendicular to LME. The orientation of skin excisions and repair of wounds are usually made parallel to RSTLs when possible ( Fig. 6.4 ). Orienting them this way places the maximum wound closure tension parallel to LME and perpendicular to RSTLs. This orientation results in wound repair, which is performed with the least amount of wound closure tension. Minimal wound closure tension is extremely beneficial in minimizing the appearance of facial scars. A converse of this is that incisions made at right angles to RSTLs usually heal with wider and more visible scars.

Skin extensibility is sometimes referred to as mechanical creep . Mechanical tissue creep results in reduction of wound closure tension over time because tension is reduced when skin is held under a constant strain. Mechanical creep is different than the ability of skin to expand, which is known as biological creep . Skin expansion is a secondary phenomenon in which there is augmentation of skin surface area as a result of applying constant tension to the skin over a prolonged period of time. Biological creep occurs in the abdomen skin during pregnancy and over tissue expanders placed beneath the skin.

An important factor that may limit skin expansion is the attachments of the skin to underlying structures such as fascial or aponeurotic connections to the skin. Skin expansion is resisted by structures that anchor the skin by aponeurotic or tendon insertions in bone. Examples of these include medial and lateral canthi, bony orbital rim, zygomatic arch, and the malar eminence. Undermining the skin reduces wound closure tension and more widely distributes skin deformation. Undermining releases the attachments of the skin to the underlying fascia allowing the skin to become more expansible. Moderate skin undermining is beneficial in reducing wound closure tension; however, extensive skin undermining is not usually helpful in further reducing the wound tension although it may assist with tissue draping and reduction in secondary tissue movement.

The pedicle of a flap is that portion, together with adjacent tissue, responsible for providing vascularity to the flap. The pedicle may consist of skin and subcutaneous fat, muscle, or a combination of all three. A pedicle may also consist only of subcutaneous tissue or, on occasion, an individual artery and vein unencumbered by surrounding tissue. When a local flap has no cutaneous connections with surrounding skin and is supplied by only subcutaneous tissue or an individual artery and vein, the flap is referred to as an island flap . Nearly all island local flaps in the face are based on a subcutaneous tissue pedicle. Local skin flaps should be designed with a pedicle that will provide ample vascularity.

Flap delay is a means of increasing the blood flow to a flap. Delay is accomplished by incising all or a portion of the flap and elevating all or a portion before returning the flap to its in situ position. The incisions are sutured and the flap is left in place usually for 10 to 14 days before transferring the flap to a recipient site. Delay results in an enhanced circulation to the flap, probably by the closing of arteriovenous shunts and the realignment of the vasculature in the subdermal plexus. Delay is rarely used with local flaps of the face because of the overall rich blood supply to facial skin. Delay is reserved for particularly large flaps used to repair major facial defects in situations where skin vascularity has been compromised by irradiation, previous surgery, or, on occasion, in patients using tobacco.

The face can be divided into specific areas or aesthetic regions, which are covered by skin that has common characteristics. These skin characteristics include thickness, quantity of subcutaneous fat, degree of adherence to underlying fascia, color, and texture and hair growth. Coincidentally, these facial areas are separated from each other by ridges or valleys in the skin created by the facial skeleton or musculature. These ridges and valleys are known as aesthetic borders and are identified by facial landmarks including eyebrows, melolabial creases, mental crease, philtrum crests, vermilion borders, and anterior hairline. Aesthetic regions and their accompanying borders provide form, character, and individual uniqueness to the face. The principle aesthetic regions of the face are the forehead, eyelids, cheeks, nose, lips, mentum, and auricles ( Fig. 6.5 ). Some aesthetic regions may be divided into a number of components known as aesthetic units, which are separated by borders somewhat less discreet than those that delineate aesthetic regions. The forehead may be divided into central and temporal units. The cheek is divided into infraorbital, zygomatic, buccal, and parotid masseteric units. The upper lip is divided into philtrum and paired lateral units. The lower third of the face is divided into labial and mental units. The nose is particularly suited for division into aesthetic units because of its complex topography. It may be divided into nine aesthetic units, which include dorsum, paired sidewalls, tip lobule, paired nasal facets, paired alae, and columella. These units are highlighted when incident light is cast on the nasal surface, creating shadows along the borders of each unit and topographic landmarks. As with facial aesthetic units, the framework of the nose supporting the overlying skin is primarily responsible for variations in light reflections and gives rise to the aesthetic border between the nasal units.

The concept of facial aesthetic regions, and the borders that separate them, is important when designing local flaps for facial reconstruction. The preferred flap for reconstruction is frequently one that can be designed within the same aesthetic region as that containing the primary defect. Scars are best camouflaged by placing incisions along borders that separate aesthetic regions. When a defect involves two or more aesthetic regions, it is usually best to compartmentalize the repair. Individual skin flaps are designed to construct the separate components of the defect that are located within separate aesthetic regions. This may ensure likeness of skin quality, but, more importantly, places scars in the aesthetic borders. It is often a benefit to enlarge the primary defect by extending the defect to an aesthetic border or to even enlarge the defect to occupy an entire aesthetic unit. Repair of the defect with a local flap will then position a border of the flap in an aesthetic border for improved scar camouflage.

LOCAL FLAP CLASSIFICATION

Cutaneous flaps may be classified by the nature of their blood supply (random vs. arterial), by configuration (rhomboid, bilobe, etc.), by location (forehead, cheek, lip), or by the method of transferring the flap. Flaps classified by location are identified by the region of the body they are harvested from. This location may be near or considerably removed from the primary defect. When removed from the defect, such flaps are transferred either by microvascular surgery or by staged movement of the flap toward the recipient site. Based on location, flaps are classified as local, regional, or distant. A local flap is one where tissue immediately adjacent to or near the primary defect is used to cover the defect. The vast majority of skin flaps discussed in this textbook are considered local flaps. In regards to facial reconstruction, a regional flap is one where tissue is harvested from a site not located on the face, scalp, or neck, but the pedicle is sufficiently long to enable the flap to reach the primary defect. An example of a regional flap for facial repair is a deltopectoral flap transferred from the anterior chest wall to repair a defect of the lip or cheek. A distant flap is one that is harvested from sites so removed from the face that the pedicle is not sufficiently long to enable the flap to reach the face. Distant flaps are usually transferred to the face as free flaps , which are sometime referred to as microsurgical flaps . The blood vessels of their pedicle are connected to vessels in the head or neck using microvascular surgical techniques. Another way of transferring distant flaps to the face is by staging tubed flaps in which the pedicle is “walked” toward the recipient site. This method has been abandoned since the development of microsurgical techniques.

The most common way to classify flaps based on blood supply is to categorize them as random or axial pattern flaps. This is discussed in detail in Chapter 2 . Random pattern flaps are based on the rich perforating vascular plexus of the skin ( Fig. 6.6 ). They do not have a named blood vessel providing vascularity to the flap. In contrast, axial pattern flaps are dependent on a named artery for the majority of their blood supply ( Fig. 6.7 ). The course of these vessels run parallel to the linear axis of the flap and are usually located in the subcutaneous fat directly beneath the skin of the flap. Most axial pattern flaps have a degree of random pattern vascularity to their distal portion. The majority of cutaneous flaps of the face are random pattern. The most common axial pattern flap harvested from the face is the paramedian forehead flap based on the supratrochlear artery and vein.

Classifying flaps by method of transfer, which is to say method of tissue movement, is usually the most convenient way of discussing flaps relative to their use in repairing facial cutaneous defects ( Table 6.1 ). This classification divides local flaps into pivotal, advancement, and hinge . Advancement flaps, in the majority of situations, depend on stretching the flap skin in the direction of flap movement. Such flaps are subjected to an increase in wound closure tension. In contrast, pivotal flaps rotate about a point at their base and in their purest form are not stretched. Thus they are not subjected to wound closure tension greater than the natural tension of the remaining facial skin, although the repair of the donor site of the flap is subjected to increased skin tension. In the vast majority of circumstances when using pivotal flaps, however, tissue movement is achieved through a combination of pivoting and advancement. That is, the movement of most pivotal flaps is aided by the stretching (advancement) of the flap skin. Surgeons often speak of combined mechanisms of tissue movement such as “advancement rotation flaps.” For clarity, the major mechanism of tissue movement should dictate the term given to describe a particular flap, unless both mechanisms are of approximately equal importance.

PIVOTAL FLAPS

There are four types of pivotal flaps: rotation, transposition, interpolated, and island . All pivotal flaps are moved toward the defect by pivoting the flap around a fixed point at the base of the pedicle. Except for island flaps skeletonized to the level of their nutrient vessels, the greater the pivot, the shorter the effective length of the flap ( Fig. 6.8 ). Pivoting a flap with a cutaneous pedicle 45° from its in situ position reduces the effective length by 5%. A 90° or 180° pivot reduces the effective length by 15% and 40%, respectively. The reduction in effective length must be accounted for when designing pivotal flaps so that greater pivoting requires a longer design of the flap. As the flap turns in an arc around its relatively fixed pivotal point, redundant tissue, known as a standing cutaneous deformity (dog ear), develops at the base. Similar to effective length, there is a positive correlation between the degree of pivoting and the size of the standing cutaneous deformity. The greater the pivot, the larger the deformity that occurs. Thus increasing the flap’s pivot will change the flap’s shape, shorten the effective length, and deform the flap’s base by development of a standing cutaneous deformity. To limit these restricting factors, a flap’s arc of pivot should not exceed 90º whenever possible.

ROTATION FLAPS

Rotation flaps are pivotal flaps with a curvilinear configuration. They are designed immediately adjacent to the defect and are best used to close triangular defects. In such instances, the triangular-shaped defect is covered by a portion of the standing cutaneous deformity, thus facilitating the pivotal movement of the flap and reducing the amount of standing cutaneous deformity excision required ( Fig. 6.9 ). This flap usually makes use of some advancement, and when it does, the vector of greatest wound closure tension is along a line from the base of the flap to a distal point of the curvilinear border. When no advancement is used to move the flap, animal studies have shown the greatest wound closure tension is found at the secondary wound closure site perpendicular to the periphery of the flap, not across the leading border of the flap. These studies have also demonstrated minimal mechanical benefit at the defect site of extending the arc of flap rotation beyond 90º from the axis of the primary defect ( Fig. 6.10 ). There may be benefit, however, in extending the incision to accommodate the redraping of the skin. A back cut at the base of the flap shifts the position of the pivotal point and thus changes the wound closure tension vector as well as the location of the standing cutaneous deformity.

Inherent with rotation flaps is the unequal lengths of the flap’s border compared with the length of the primary and secondary defect. To equalize this discrepancy, it may be necessary to excise an equalizing Burow’s triangle at some point along the periphery of the curvilinear incision. Ideally, the triangle should have the same width as the width of the primary defect. Excision of a Burow’s triangle has the effect of equalizing the lengths of the two sides of the incision. Another solution, which may avoid the need for an equalizing triangle, is to change the movement of the flap from one that is purely pivotal to one that is both pivotal and advancement. Stretching the flap in essence lengthens the peripheral border of the flap so that it approaches the sum length of the primary and secondary defect. As a general rule, when designing rotation flaps on the face, the length of the incision should be four times the width of the defect. With this 4:1 ratio, excision of a Burow’s triangle is usually not necessary. To avoid a standing cutaneous deformity at the base of the flap, the defect’s shape ideally should have a triangular configuration with a height-to-width ratio of 2:1. In addition, if the arc of the flap’s incision is to be a completely symmetric curve, the height of the triangular defect should be 0.5 to 1 times the radius of the curve of the flap.

There are several advantages of the rotation flap. The flap has only two borders; thus it lends itself to placing one side in a border between aesthetic regions of the face. The flap is broad based, and therefore its vascularity tends to be reliable. There is great flexibility in the design and positioning of the flap. When possible, the flap should be designed so that it is inferiorly based, which promotes lymphatic drainage and minimizes flap edema.

Disadvantages of rotation flaps are relatively few. The defect itself must be somewhat triangular or must be modified by removing normal tissue to create a triangular defect. The configuration of the flap includes a right angle at the distal tip and the surgeon must take care in positioning the tip so that it is not subjected to excessive wound closure tension and vascular compromise. The curvilinear incision necessary to create the flap does not easily lie in RSTLs (see Fig. 6.3 ). As with all pivotal flaps, rotation flaps develop standing cutaneous deformities at their base that may risk compromising flap vascularity if removed. A second stage revision in which the standing cutaneous deformity is removed may be necessary.

TRANSPOSITION FLAPS

In contrast to rotation flaps, which have a curvilinear configuration, transposition flaps have a linear configuration. Both are pivotal flaps moving about a pivotal point. Both flaps develop standing cutaneous deformities at their bases and as a consequence, their effective length decreases as they pivot. This reduction in effective length must be considered when designing such flaps. Rotation flaps must be designed in such a way that one border of the flap is also a border of the defect that it is intended to repair. Like rotation flaps, transposition flaps may be designed so that one border of the flap is also a border of the defect (see Fig. 6.1 ); however, it may also be designed with borders that are removed from the defect ( Fig. 6.11 ). In this case, only the base of the flap is contiguous with the defect. The area of greatest wound closure tension is at the closure site of the secondary defect adjacent to the base of the flap. Depending on whether the flap is stretched and the degree of stretching, the greatest wound closure tension may be along a vector from the pivotal point to the most peripheral border of the flap. The ability to construct a flap some distance from the defect with its axis independent from the linear axis of the defect is one of the greatest advantages of transposition flaps. This fact enables the surgeon to recruit skin at variable distances from the defect, selecting donor sites with the greatest skin elasticity or redundancy. In addition, the ability to select a variable site for harvesting a flap may allow the selection of a donor site that will provide the best possible scar camouflage or even the ability to hide the scar in aesthetic boundaries.

Transposition is the most common method of transferring local flaps to skin defects of the head and neck. A transposition flap is a reconstructive option for small-to-medium sized defects of almost any conceivable configuration or location, thus making it the most useful of local flaps in facial reconstruction ( Fig. 6.12 ).

Two types of transposition flaps frequently used are rhombic and bilobe flaps. Rhombic flaps depend on advancement for part of their tissue movement, but the majority of movement is pivotal. A rhombus is an equilateral parallelogram. A rhombus defect may be thought of as two equilateral triangles placed base to base to form a rhombus with adjacent angles of 60º and 120º. All sides and the short diagonal of the defect must be equal in a 60º to 120º rhombus defect and flap ( Fig. 6.13 ). Once the 60º to 120º rhombus defect has been created with all sides equal, the flap is designed by directly extending the short diagonal a distance equal to all other sides. This creates the first border of the flap. The second border of the flap, again equal to all other sides, is drawn parallel to one of the adjacent borders of the defect.

The greatest wound closure tension when using a rhombus flap is at the donor site and has been calculated to be 20º from the short diagonal line across the base of the flap. Wide undermining of the surrounding tissue has minimal effect on the wound closure tension. Thus, when designing the flap, skin mobility and extensibility are important factors when selecting the site for the flap. Understanding the vector of the resultant wound closure tension is critical to avoid distortion of surrounding structures. For every rhombus defect, four potential flaps may be designed (see Fig. 6.13 ). The surgeon can quickly visualize the resulting scar configuration and approximate the vector of maximum wound closure tension by drawing the flap and then covering the two parallel sides of the flap with his or her fingers.

The design of the rhombus flap is more complex than most other facial skin flaps because of the geometry and option of placing the flap in four separate locations about a rhombus defect. The author does not use the rhombus flap or its variations frequently, primarily because approximately half of the entire length of the scar that results from use of the flap is not parallel or does not lie within RSTLs. This disadvantage is most important in the area of the forehead where skin creases are more prominent. RSTLs are less important in the cheek, where creases are not as prominent, the skin is thinner, and the resulting scar from the use of a rhombus flap tends to blend better with the adjacent skin.

The bilobe flap is a double transposition flap that shares a single base. Each lobe of the flap has a separate pivotal point, and thus each has a standing cutaneous deformity. It was originally designed for repair of nasal defects but has frequently been used to reconstruct cheek defects as well. In the classic design of the bilobe flap, the axis of the first and second lobes, as well as the defect, were all separated by an angle of 90º (180º total; Fig. 6.14 ). This design transferred the tension of the wound closure through a 90º arc, which is more than the usual 45º to 60º arc of a single transposition flap. This greater movement about a pivotal point, together with the use of two tissue flaps, assists to minimize wound closure tension of the primary and secondary defects.

The major disadvantage of the bilobe flap is that the majority of the incision necessary to create the two lobes of the flap produces scars that do not parallel RSTLs. The configuration of the lobes, however, may often be designed to have an angular shape, which may conform to RSTLs better than curvilinear designs. The resulting scar from bilobe flaps is also lengthy because of the requirement of elevating two lobes.

INTERPOLATED FLAP

The interpolated flap, like the transposition flap, is transferred by pivotal movement and has a linear configuration but differs from transposition flaps in that its base is not contiguous with the defect. Thus the pedicle must cross over or under intervening tissue ( Fig. 6.15 ). If the pedicle passes over intervening tissue, the pedicle must subsequently be divided in a second surgical procedure. This is referred to as “in setting the flap.” Thus two surgical stages are required; this is the greatest disadvantage of such flaps. On occasion, the pedicle can be de-epithelialized or reduced to subcutaneous tissue only (island flap) and brought under the intervening skin to allow for a single-stage reconstruction. Passing flaps through a subcutaneous tunnel may compromise the vascularity of the pedicle or create a contour deformity along its path.

The paramedian forehead flap used to repair large defects of the nose is the arch type of interpolated flap ( Fig. 6.16 ). This flap is exceedingly reliable because of its axial blood supply based on the supratrochlear artery and vein. The flap is designed so that the vessels that are located in the subcutaneous tissue plane extend along the axis of the flap providing an ample blood supply to the skin. Because of this, the portion of the flap cephalic to the level of the eyebrow and extending up to the level of the anterior hairline can be trimmed of its frontalis muscle and most of the subcutaneous fat without harming the blood supply to the skin of the flap.

Similar to the interpolated paramedian forehead flap used for nasal reconstruction, the melolabial interpolated flap transferred from the cheek to the nose is a reliable flap for reconstructing alar defects. The flap may be based on a cutaneous pedicle ( Fig. 6.17 ) or subcutaneous tissue pedicle ( Fig. 6.18 ). Regardless of the nature of the pedicle, it is divided and the flap is inset at the nose 3 weeks after transferring the flap to its recipient site. Unlike the forehead flap, the cheek flap has a random blood supply and cannot safely be thinned of as much of its subcutaneous fat as the forehead flap. Interpolated flaps have the advantage of crossing over rather than through the intervening tissue between flap donor site and the defect, so they do not distort boundaries between aesthetic regions of the face. This ensures a completely natural appearing border between the cheek or forehead and the nose. Another advantage of an interpolated flap is that it can be harvested in regions of redundant tissue, which may be at sites removed from the immediate area of the defect. That is, the base of the flap is not immediately juxtaposed to the defect as required by the use of transposition and rotation flaps.