Enhancing Positive Outcomes for Children of Substance-Abusing Parents


Introduction

Adolescent behavioral health problems are on the rise worldwide, particularly for impulse control disorders (ICDs) including substance abuse, delinquency, obesity, and HIV/sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) for genetic and environmental reasons. Contributing to these developmental issues are children growing up in families of substance abusing, depressed, highly stressed, and dysfunctional parents. Even simple things such as the diminishing number of family meals eaten together has been found to have a negative impact on adolescent’s risk for substance use and negative youth development.fn1

Substance abuse has been a concern for many years, but recently there have been alarming rates of increasing adolescent tobacco, alcohol, and drug use worldwide, particularly in girls and women. In many developed countries, adolescent legal and illegal substance use has been rising for the past 5 years. along with concerns about youth risky consumption patterns in Europe and the United States. In the United States, 2014 resulted in nonsignificant decreases in adolescent substance use mostly because of a decrease in marijuana use. The biggest recent increase in substance use in adolescents has been in the use of party drugs—prescription drugs, binging on alcohol, and prescription drug misuse and e-cigarettes. The use of e-cigarettes is now higher than use of regular cigarettes, the use of which has decreased since 1992. Of course, teen alcohol misuse and accidents is the major cause of teen mortality. Traditional gender differences have narrowed in the United States and most countries. Girls have higher rates of tobacco and alcohol use in the 8th grade; however, by 10th grade, boys generally catch up.

The misuse of alcohol and other drugs has a significant impact on the global health and economy as well as the well-being of children and families. It is estimated that around 48% of adults worldwide use alcohol and 4.5% use illicit drugs, although only about 15% misuse alcohol and drugs. The greater the consumption of alcohol, the greater the harm done. It is of interest that Europeans have the highest amount of yearly alcohol consumption in the world: 2.5 times that of the world average. Despite lower overall consumption levels in Northern European countries compared with Southern European countries, where drinking small amounts of wine with meals is common, when Northern Europeans in Nordic counties drink they display more detrimental patterns of excessive use. Alcohol and other drug misuse has a wide impact on all strata of society, not just in terms of illness and disease, but also related to violence and crime rates, workplace injuries and performance, and family stability and relationship breakdown. The cost of addictions in the United States is very high and is estimated at about $2000 per person in economic costs related to lost revenue, taxes, treatment costs, criminal justice costs, fires, accidents, and other related costs.

Prevalence of Children of Substance Abusers

Substance misuse by adults does great harm to both themselves and society in general. Their children are impacted as well, often negatively, because many adult substance abusers are also parents. Substance abuse is a family disease because the addict affects those who live around him or her. Parental substance abuse is a public health concern due to its high prevalence and relationship to many negative child developmental and health outcomes. Although about 10.5% of US children currently live with a parent who had a diagnosed alcohol use disorder, about 25% of US children (19 million) have been exposed to parental alcoholism at some point while growing up and about 12.7%, or 9.2 million, have been exposed to parental drug abuse. These children might have been damaged by alcohol or drug exposure in utero or impacted by a chaotic and nonsupportive family environment.

Children’s Feelings and Beliefs About Parents’ Substance Misuse

Recent studies have reported on the child’s perspective toward their alcohol or drug-using parents. These studies demonstrate three common themes: family role reversal with the child taking on some parental duties, keeping the family secret with a strong “Do Not Tell” message from parents, and various coping and resilience strategies such as finding supportive people outside the family, use of humor, and having goals in life. These themes demonstrate the need for new approaches and interventions to support the development of children living in families where drug use is a problem. Children can feel confused and insecure when they do not understand their parents’ erratic behavior and mood, which can be significantly impacted by the effect of alcohol or other drugs. Parents are often like Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde—two different personalities. They tend to be more loving and humorous when using moderately, but can be anxious, paranoid, and use excessive punishment when in withdrawal from their drugs. Of course, the impact on the personality of the parent depends on the drug of choice and other mental health problems. Excessive use of stimulants can make parents more agitated and dangerous to children, whereas heroin or depressant users tend to just get sleepy and groggy. Many children take on the parents’ role for their younger siblings due to the incapacitating effects of some drugs.

Differences Between Children of Alcoholics and Children of Other Drug Abusers

There are many different combinations of substances that can be abused and patterns of parental chemical dependence that influence the lives of the children growing up in alcoholic or chemically addicted families. First, the behavior surrounding the drug of choice differs. Unlike alcohol, the possession of heroin or cocaine is illegal, as is marijuana in most states. Children exposed to parents who abuse illegal drugs are also exposed to an aspect of life that children of alcoholics are not; using illegal drugs means that it is a criminal offense. The children who know about their parents’ drug use must be involved in a shroud of secrecy, giving rise to a home environment that is veiled in fear, lest the authorities find out about what their parents do. Unlike alcohol, which can be consumed openly and without fear of legal reprisal (barring certain restrictions), illicit drug use/abuse requires great secrecy. For this reason, the child of an addicted parent must contend with the secretive illegal drug activity of their parent both at home and in the community. Second, unlike children of alcoholics, the AIDS epidemic directly confronts the children of addicted parents, especially if the parents are intravenous drug users. Loss of significant others due to AIDS-related illness may become more pronounced in the lives of these children. Addicted parents may have AIDS (or be HIV positive); friends of their parents may have AIDS, or babies in the community may be HIV positive. Third, the type of chemical dependence influences the type of childhood home environment, especially if the addicted parent abuses heroin or is involved with an insidious addiction to crack. Parents involved with deviant activities may invite adult friends into the home who are also involved with similar activities. The presence of adult antisocial role models is a strong possibility for children living with addicted parents. Home environment is a critically important variable in shaping cognitive skills, academic achievement, and psychosocial adjustment. Deviant home environments are the source of many childhood behavioral problems. Finally, the effect of the drug on the parents’ behavior is profound. Methamphetamine addicts act one way, and heroin addicts another. This affects the parental role and parental behavior profoundly.

Higher Risk for Addictions

Research suggests that children of addicted parents are at 2–9 times greater risk of becoming substance abusers as adolescents or adults depending on genetic risk, despite the positive and adaptive behavioral outcomes of many of these children. Among adolescents, children of substance abusers misuse substances more than children whose parents are not substance abusers and escalate their use more steeply. As young adults they are more likely to be diagnosed with alcohol and drug abuse/dependence. The risk for later substance misuse depends on their degree of risk factors compared with protective factors including risk factors associated with the extent of their family history of alcoholism, which includes whether one or both parents are abusers and the addiction severity, the type of alcoholism that runs in the family, and the extent of their parents’ antisocial behavior, health, and mental health problems. Gender differences also exist; for example, girls have increased vulnerability to the negative impact on later drug use from family environmental risks, which are high in families with substance-abusing parents.

Living with a parent who abuses alcohol or other drugs can have severe effects on every aspect of a child’s life, including social acceptance, mental and physical health, and school performance. Most studies find that children of substance abusers have elevated rates of psychological symptoms. Beyond risk for addictive behaviors, children of substance abusers are also at higher risk for developing emotional, behavioral, academic, criminal, and other social problems, particularly if both parents are substance abusers, have type II alcoholism, or genetic risks such as short alleles of the serotonin transporter (5- HTTLPR ) gene, and there is high stress and conflict in the family. They tend to be lower on protective factors and higher on risk factors, thereby increasing their risk for depression, anxiety, suicide, eating disorders, chemical dependency, teen pregnancy, and HIV.

They tend to have heightened levels of conduct problems in preschool and elementary school and delinquency in adolescence, particularly if their parents also show antisocial behaviour. Children of substance abusers also demonstrate elevations in impulsivity and activity level as well as behavioral disinhibition, leading some researchers to view them as behaviorally undercontrolled. Children of alcoholics have been found in a longitudinal study to age 23 years to employ more of a cognitive coping style and less of a decision-making coping style than children of nonalcoholic parents. Similarly, children of two parents with substance use disorders tend to use aggression as a major coping style, compared with children of only one or no parents with substance abuse disorders, who use a more problem-solving, decision-making style of coping. Earlier studies described children of substance abusers as higher in “difficult temperament,” meaning a relatively stable trait, likely genetically linked, that led to increased emotional and behavioral liability and difficulty with behavioral control. Parental alcoholism has also been linked to anxiety and depression in children, and West and Prinz have noted that children of alcoholics had higher levels of anxiety and depression than did controls in 10 of 11 published studies. Longitudinal studies up to three decades, found that children of alcoholics consistently reported greater risk for stressors in the family domain of 11 life areas. In addition, they report repeated and more severe stressors into adulthood in their family.

In addition, children of substance abusers show lower academic achievement than do children whose parents are not substance abusers, even in comparison with depressed children or children of divorce, and they have poorer cognitive functioning in the preschool years than do children whose parents are not substance abusers. Casas-Gil and Navarro-Guzman have identified five variables in which school performance by children of alcoholics was poorer: intelligence, repeating a grade, low academic performance, skipping school days, and dropping out of school. Sons of male alcoholics who have many alcoholic relatives across generations have been reported to show deficits in verbal and abstract reasoning and verbal learning. For this subgroup, Pihl and associates suggested that cognitive deficits may be caused by heritable dysfunctions of the prefrontal cortex and limbic systems. However, cognitive impairments may also stem from fetal alcohol exposure, high stress levels in pregnant mothers or a lack of environmental stimulation or conversely a chaotic home environment. Studies find that in the absence of family stress and conflict, the academic performance of boys who are children of alcoholics is similar to that of boys who are not until high school. As more thoroughly explained below, high family stress and elevated cortisol levels has been found to be related to triggering the phenotypic expression of genetic risks according to Brody and associates. Hence, for both environmental and genetic reasons, children of alcoholics living with high family conflict would likely have more trouble with their academic performance.

Genetic Risks

Family, adoption, and twin studies support the heritability of addictions, which is estimated to contribute to about 40%–60% of the overall risk. This heritable influence appears not to be substance specific. For instance, children of alcoholics today are also becoming abusers of illegal and prescription drugs. Children in families with many early onset alcoholics (beginning use before 15 years of age) are at highest risk for later substance abuse or addiction because this is an indicator of type II alcoholism. Type II alcoholism is the highly heritable type of alcoholism that appears to have a heavy genetic loading as compared with type I alcoholism, which is more environmentally caused. Research suggests that about 60% of the variance in risk for an alcohol use disorder is related to genetic factors and the remaining 40% is due to environmental factors in this type of alcoholism in males. However, twin and adoption studies suggest that girls are not at such a high risk. In females, only about 40% of the variance in risk for an alcohol use disorder is related to genetic factors and the remaining 60% is due to environmental factors. However, this risk increases if both biological parents are alcoholics from type II alcoholism families. Luthar and associates found that similar adverse circumstances are present for children whose parents abuse illegal drugs. They concluded, however, that maternal drug abuse per se is not as damaging to children’s resilience as maternal stress, depression, and anxiety disorders.

Which Genes Are Involved?

Since the completion of the human genome project, there has been considerable interest in the identification of genes involved in this complex disease. Research has identified many genes that contain allelic variants associated with heritable phenotypes or characteristics that enhance vulnerability to addiction. More than 1500 genes have been implicated in research to increase vulnerability to addiction. However, a meta-analysis of these studies by a Chinese research team found that only five gene pathways were involved in the four major types of drug dependency from a total of 18 statistically significant molecular pathways for single types of addiction. These five pathways may underlie shared rewarding and addictive processes—that is, neuroactive ligand-signaling interaction, long-term potentiation, and the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway linked to memory and learning, and two new ones: (1) the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone signaling pathway involved in gonadotrophin secretion, and (2) stress-induced drug seeking and gap junction. They connected the five pathways into one common hypothetical molecular network for addictions. Although there are many genes involved in substance use disorder, researchers have found that the most genetically at-risk adolescents are those with one or two short alleles of the 5- HTTLPR serotonin transporter gene. They are more likely to become substance abusers, depressed, or delinquent, with lower behavioral and emotional control. This genetic risk is not rare and is found in 40% of whites and 60% of Asians and Native Americans, making them at higher risk for substance use disorders, depression, anxiety, and behaviors disorders. The 7-repeat dopamine gene has also been linked to increase substance abuse.

Epigenetic studies of the interaction of genes and environment have found that reducing stress in genetically at-risk individuals through positive parenting can dramatically reduce the phenotypic expression of genetic vulnerability in mice and children by 50%. According to Uhl and associates, “The overlapping genetic vulnerability for developing dependence on a variety of addictive substances suggests large roles for ‘higher order’ pharmacogenomics in addiction molecular genetics.” Discovering the pharmacogenomics of addiction is likely to have broad implications for neurotherapeutics.

Genetic factors have been shown to influence deviant peer selection. However, there is also support for interactions between genetic risk and peer influences. For example, Harden et al. found that adolescents who were genetically at risk for alcohol and tobacco use were also the most vulnerable to influences from their closest friends. Park et al. found that carriers of the dopamine receptor D4 long allele were more prone to alcohol dependency related to the influence of their heavy drinking sorority and fraternity friends.

Characteristics or Phenotypes of Children of Alcoholics That Increase Their Risk

Because the specific genes for addiction are only now beginning to be discovered, research has focused on identification of the phenotypes or disorders these children could inherit that increase their rates of substance abuse. Actually, genotypes do not always translate directly into phenotypes; hence, predicting later substance abuse is enhanced by monitoring the behaviors of high-risk children with many relatives who began alcohol or drug use before the age of 15 years of age.

These phenotypes or characteristics of children of substance abusers with type II alcoholism with genetic risks include higher rates of neuropsychological and limbic system deficits that include either: (1) behavioral and emotional self-regulation problems or (2) reduced executive functioning. Research suggests that these two cognitive deficits are primary factors leading to reduced resilience and increase risk for addiction.

Children of substance abusers have been reported to be genetically vulnerable to two major syndromes: (1) the overstressed youth syndrome (e.g., poor emotional regulation, difficult temperament, autonomic hyperreactivity, and rapid brain waves) and (2) prefrontal cognitive deficits in verbal and abstract reasoning and verbal learning. These cognitive deficits reduce their ability to understand that their parents’ erratic behaviors are caused by drugs and not by the child’s own behaviors. Schuckit found that alcohol smooths out the overactive autonomic nervous system stress response in children of alcoholics so that they report feeling normal for the first time in their lives. Alcohol and drugs also increase essential neurotransmitters such as dopamine, serotonin, and noradrenalin, which reduce their depression and anxiety. Hence, children of alcoholics are likely self-medicating their overreaction to stressors and depression/anxiety with alcohol and drugs. Unfortunately, the consequences of substance abuse frequently leads to increased negative consequences and more stress.

Fetal Alcohol and Drug Exposure

Of interest is that exposure to toxins like alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs in utero, appears to lead to similar neurodevelopmental deficits (e.g., prefrontal cognitive deficits and poor emotional regulation) as the genetic risks listed above. Unfortunately substance abuse by girls has been increasing dramatically since 1992; hence, young women are attracting attention as more enter drug treatment and are mothers. They become addicted more quickly and for different reasons. They appear to be influenced more by pressures to use or by observing the use of substances by friends, peers, and family members.

The economic cost of fetal alcohol syndrome and fetal alcohol effect (FAS and FAE) is very high. Popova et al. estimated that the lifetime economic costs of just one baby born with FAS in 2002 was estimated at $2 million. Chasnoff’s research suggests that the damage to the brain is mostly in the last 3 months when the brain is developing rapidly. Hence, if a pregnant woman stops substance use in the last trimester, much of the brain damage can be prevented. If not, children with FAS generally have significantly reduced general intelligence, executive functioning, language-based memory, and functional communication skills, which can result in more aggression and behavioral disorders. Unfortunately, more than 80% are not diagnosed appropriately when adopted or put into foster care, so they are not getting the services they need.

Adolescent Drinking and Brain Development

The adolescent brain is still maturing until about 25 years. Hence high levels of drinking or drug use in adolescence can lead to brain neurotoxicity and affect cognitive development, particularly in the higher cognitive executive functioning in the prefrontal cortex. The prefrontal cortex is involved in working memory, voluntary motor behavior, impulse control, rule learning, spatial learning, planning, and decision-making (Spear and White and Swartzwelder ). The new brain science suggests that youth who drink regularly may be delayed in brain development and not be connecting the dots about consequences that would possibly reduce their drinking in risky situations such as drinking and driving.

Two important neurotransmitter systems that undergo substantial changes during adolescence and are affected by alcohol consumption are dopamine and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). This damage to neurotransmitters and brain development can also affect increased depression and anxiety, and social and educational achievement. The ability to form new memories under the influence of alcohol is reduced, particularly in younger adolescents. A study of college students found that students with a history of binge drinking performed worse on memory tasks after consuming alcohol than did students without such a history. Adolescents were more disrupted by ethanol in trace conditioning than adults, and adults were more disrupted by ethanol in context fear conditioning than adolescents. Adolescent rats with prenatal exposure to alcohol are more impacted in fear conditioning studies than those without prenatal exposure, because of damage to hippocampal anatomy.

Adolescents seem less sensitive than adults to other effects of drinking, such as impairment of motor coordination, sedation, and susceptibility to seizures during withdrawal. A study by Slawecki et al. found that during adolescence an acute alcohol dose significantly altered several electroencephalography (EEG) variables in the hippocampus and other brain regions of the control animals, but not in animals that had been exposed to alcohol during adolescence. Hence, it appears they can develop a tolerance to some alcohol effects. Some positron emission tomography (PET) studies suggest that the brain’s recovery from dopamine depletion from substance use disorders (particularly cocaine and methamphetamine) can take up to 2 years, but luckily it can recover.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here