Endovascular Angioplasty and Stenting for Proximal Subclavian Artery Stenosis


The prevalence of atherosclerotic stenotic disease involving the proximal brachiocephalic arteries is significantly less than that in the extracranial carotid arteries. Additionally, only 10% of patients with hemodynamically significant proximal subclavian artery stenoses develop symptoms. This probably reflects the robust collateral network distal to ostial subclavian artery stenosis, including the vertebral and internal mammary arteries. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of data on the natural history of untreated proximal subclavian artery stenosis.

The incidence of subclavian steal syndrome was evaluated in more than 7881 patients undergoing carotid artery duplex scanning. A pressure difference of more than 20 mm Hg, indicating subclavian artery stenosis, was found in 514 (6.5%); however, symptoms were only present in 38 patients, with the majority being related to the posterior circulation. Patients with a difference of greater than 40 mm Hg in the extremities were more likely to have associated symptoms. In patients undergoing evaluation for coronary artery disease, 2.5% were found to have significant proximal left subclavian artery stenosis. The MESA study (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) evaluated 6743 patients and reported that 4.6% of patients had subclavian stenosis, as defined by a systolic blood pressure difference of 15 mm Hg. There was also a higher prevalence in women (5.1%) compared with African Americans and men (3.9%).

Clinical Evaluation and Diagnosis

Most patients with subclavian stenosis are asymptomatic. Patients are often referred for evaluation by primary care physicians after they find asymmetry in the upper extremity blood pressures. A brachial blood pressure difference exceeding 15 to 20 mm Hg is considered a significant finding.

Symptoms of subclavian artery stenosis can occur either in the form of exertional ischemia of the extremity (limb fatigue or pain) or, rarely, digital embolization, which can manifest as ulcerations or nonhealing wounds. Vertebrobasilar symptoms can occur in patients with reversal of flow in the vertebral artery, and this is referred to as subclavian steal syndrome. Angina or acute myocardial infarction can occur in patients with a previously placed internal mammary bypass and hemodynamically significant proximal subclavian stenosis.

Rarely, patients present with pseudohypotension and are found to have severe bilateral subclavian artery stenoses. Physical examination should include an inspection of the hand and digits for evidence of embolic phenomena; palpation of the brachial, radial, and ulnar arteries; auscultation of the supraclavicular fossa for bruits; and a recording of bilateral brachial artery pressures.

Duplex examination should be the first imaging modality to assess patients with suspected symptomatic disease. Standard imaging of the extracranial carotid arteries should be performed to assess for concomitant disease affecting these vessels, as well as an indirect assessment of the proximal carotid arteries by waveform and velocity analysis. A duplex examination of the subclavian and axillary arteries can suggest significant proximal subclavian artery disease in the presence of elevated peak systolic velocities or monophasic waveforms. However, no recognized duplex criteria have been widely accepted in assessing these arteries. A duplex examination of the vertebral artery should include direction of blood flow: antegrade, bidirectional, or reversed. Bidirectional or reversed flow suggests high-grade subclavian stenosis or occlusion or disease of the innominate artery.

Conventional subtraction angiography is the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis of a subclavian arterial stenosis and has the added benefit of an optional therapeutic intervention during the diagnostic procedure. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance arteriography have limited utility for evaluating subclavian artery stenosis before conventional angiography.

Indications for Treatment

We consider asymptomatic, good-risk patients with severe bilateral subclavian artery disease for treatment in order to facilitate accurate ambulatory blood pressure measurements. Additionally, asymptomatic patients with severe proximal left subclavian artery stenosis should be considered for intervention before coronary artery bypass grafting if the left internal mammary artery is to be used as a conduit. Symptomatic patients with exertional arm ischemia, vertebrobasilar symptoms such as subclavian steal, or angina related to a previous left internal mammary artery bypass are also offered treatment. Patients with vertebrobasilar symptoms or symptoms of subclavian steal with concomitant significant carotid artery stenosis should undergo carotid reconstruction prior to subclavian reconstruction, which may relieve their symptoms.

Endovascular treatment of subclavian artery stenosis can be performed with local sedation and minimal morbidity, but the threshold for intervention should not be lower than that of open surgical therapy. Additionally, although endovascular techniques have continued to improve since the turn of the century with lower-profile delivery systems, better stent design, and other advances, we do not agree that endovascular intervention is the first line of treatment in all patients or lesions. Nevertheless, most centers pursue angioplasty and stent placement, particularly in the management of subclavian and proximal carotid artery pathology.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here