Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) and biliary obstruction (BO) occur commonly in patients with primary or metastatic periampullary malignancies. In pancreatic cancer, for example, GOO occurs in up to 10% to 25% of patients, whereas 70% of the patients present with BO. Clinically, BO and GOO are accompanied by debilitating symptoms, and GOO is also generally associated with poor prognosis. As such, one of the main goals in therapy is to reinstitute patency of both the biliary and gastrointestinal lumens. Traditionally this is achieved with surgical bypasses through two anastomosis: a gastrojejunostomy and a hepaticojejunostomy. This approach, however, is invasive and can be associated with significant surgical morbidity. The advent of endoscopically placed enteral stents (ES) has led to their widespread application for nonsurgical management of GOO, but endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains the current standard approach for BO. Both ES and ERCP, however, have important limitations, such as risk for stent obstruction from tumor overgrowth or ingrowth. In addition, ERCP may be difficult or impossible in the setting of GOO and can be very difficult in the setting of an in situ ES placed across the papilla.
Endoscopic ultrasonography–assisted gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) and biliary drainage (EUS-BD) are two of the most important techniques that have emerged from the evolving field of interventional EUS. Endoscopic bypass is a novel concept that can potentially provide sustained luminal patency of a surgical bypass through a minimally invasive endoscopic approach. EUS-GE was first described in 1991 in an animal model. However, it became a reality in humans only after the advent of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), which allowed for a safer and more secure bypass. A recent multicenter prospective study demonstrated excellent technical and clinical success rates with endoscopic GE of 92% and 85%, respectively, in 26 patients through either the EUS-GE or natural orifice transluminal endosurgery (NOTES) technique. EUS-BD, on the other hand, was first suggested as an option when Wiersema described EUS-guided cholangiography in 1996 and has evolved to become an accepted and effective alternative to ERCP and percutaneous BD. Recently, Khashab et al. demonstrated the feasibility of performing both EUS-GE and EUS-BD in a single session in patients presenting with concomitant GOO and BO.
The aim of this chapter is to describe the endoscopic approaches to combined biliary and duodenal obstruction with the use of ES and ERCP, as well as EUS-GE and EUS-BD, in malignant GOO and BO. This will include a detailed description of the different techniques involved, indications and contraindications, current literature on the clinical outcome, and potential procedure-related adverse events and their management.
Anatomic and clinical scenarios determine the endoscopic approach to the palliative management of patients with both biliary and duodenal obstruction when approached using traditional luminal stents and ERCP.
The location of the duodenal obstruction in relation to the major papilla is the major determinant for successful endoscopic simultaneous palliation of biliary and duodenal obstruction using ERCP techniques, because duodenal obstruction can limit access to the bile duct. Mutignani et al. proposed a classification system for the three anatomic scenarios of duodenal obstruction in relation to the major papilla that determine the endoscopic approach to and technical success of combined palliation of biliary and duodenal obstruction. The classification system is as follows ( Fig. 42.1 ):
Type I stenosis occurs at the level of the duodenal bulb or upper duodenal genu but without involvement of the papilla.
Type II stenosis affects the second part of the duodenum with involvement of the major papilla.
Type III stenosis involves the third part of the duodenum distal to and without involvement of the major papilla.
Of the three types of biliary-duodenal stenoses, technical difficulty in achieving successful combined biliary and duodenal palliation is least in patients with type III duodenal stenosis, whereas type I is intermediate and type II is the most technically difficult.
The approach to type I cases is to pass the duodenoscope through the duodenal stricture to the major papilla, if possible. This may require balloon dilation of the stricture to a diameter of 15 to 18 mm ( Fig. 42.2, A ) and/or passing the balloon to the third duodenum to be used as an anchor to pull the endoscope across the stricture. Once the major papilla is reached, the biliary tree is cannulated and an expandable metal biliary stent is placed ( Fig. 42.2, B ). A guidewire is then advanced through the channel of the endoscope and passed into the fourth portion of the duodenum; the duodenoscope is withdrawn into the stomach and a duodenal stent that passes through the working channel of the endoscope is deployed across the duodenal stricture as previously described ( Fig. 42.2, C ). It is usually necessary to place the proximal end of the stent into the stomach to allow enough stent coverage of the duodenal stricture because type I strictures tend to be in the proximal duodenal bulb. If the duodenoscope cannot be advanced through the stricture despite balloon dilation, a duodenal stent can be placed across the stricture. Because the luminal diameter of commercially available duodenal stents is 20 to 22 mm and duodenoscopes are approximately 11 mm, the endoscope can usually be passed through the stent during the same procedure to allow the biliary system to be accessed with placement of biliary self-expandable metal stents (SEMS). However, this may require balloon dilation of the duodenal stent. It is important that the duodenal stent be placed with the distal end positioned proximal to the level of the major papilla to allow the bile duct to be accessed ( Fig. 42.3, A and B ). The location of the major papilla can be estimated fluoroscopically in the presence of a prior biliary stent or by passing a smaller-caliber forward-viewing endoscope to the papilla and obtaining a radiographic image with the endoscope positioned at the level of the papilla for later reference. If the duodenoscope cannot be passed through the duodenal stent lumen because of inadequate stent expansion despite balloon dilation, there are three options: Option 1 is to repeat the ERCP after waiting at least 48 to 72 hours, at which time the duodenal stent is almost always fully expanded and allows passage of the duodenoscope to the second duodenum. Option 2 is percutaneous access to the biliary tree, and option 3 is EUS-guided entry into the biliary tree to palliate BO as described in the following paragraphs.
The approach to type II cases is most difficult. The second duodenum is strictured and involves the major papilla. Unless the patient has had a prior transpapillary biliary stent placed, bile duct cannulation is often not successful because the major papilla is not endoscopically identifiable due to extensive tumor infiltration. In addition, the lumen is narrowed and there is little working room between the tip of the endoscope and the major papilla. Nonetheless, one should first attempt placement of an expandable metal biliary stent. If successful, the duodenal stent is then placed across the stricture and overlies the biliary stent. If identification and/or cannulation of the major papilla cannot be achieved, then a duodenal stent is placed across the stricture. Unfortunately, the stent will invariably further impair endoscopic visualization of the major papilla. In some cases, however, the major papilla can be identified through the interstices of the duodenal stent and the bile duct accessed with placement of a biliary SEMS. If the bile duct cannot be accessed through a transpapillary approach after duodenal stent placement, then biliary access can be achieved using a percutaneous or EUS approach. Typically, in either of the two approaches the bile duct is accessed through the liver (when EUS is used, a transgastric approach is most often used). In addition, with either approach there are two options: a rendezvous (RV) approach or completion alone using a percutaneous or EUS approach. When the RV approach is used, a guidewire is passed into the biliary tree across the stricture and through the interstices of the stent into the stent lumen ( Fig. 42.4, A and B ); if the EUS approach is used, the echoendoscope is removed. A duodenoscope is advanced into the lumen of the duodenal stent and the guidewire is grasped with a snare and withdrawn into the channel of the endoscope. A biliary stent is advanced through the endoscope channel over the guidewire into the biliary tree and deployed. The distal end of the biliary stent resides within the lumen of the duodenal stent ( Fig. 42.4, C ).When the biliary stent is placed entirely using the percutaneous approach, the stent is passed antegrade and the distal end is positioned into the duodenal lumen as described earlier ( Fig. 42.5, A–C ). When the EUS approach is undertaken, the distal end of the biliary stent can reside within the biliary tree proximal to the biliary stricture and with the proximal end deployed into the gastric lumen to create a hepaticogastric anastomosis as described later. The latter EUS-guided approach is similar to the percutaneous approach in which the guidewire is passed antegrade into the duodenum across the duodenal stricture. The stent is then passed through the echoendoscope and deployed across the stricture with the distal end into the duodenum. Finally, in a recent case report, an EUS-guided approach was performed where the echoendoscope was passed into the lumen of a previously placed duodenal stent in a type II stenosis in which the papilla could not otherwise be endoscopically visualized. The bile duct opening was identified and a transpapillary biliary SEMS placed.
Type III cases are the least common and often result from pancreatic cancer that arises from the uncinate process. The tumor encases the bile duct, causing BO, and extends inferiorly, causing duodenal obstruction below the level of the major papilla. These cases are the least technically difficult because the duodenoscope can be passed to the major papilla and to the level of the stricture. In addition, it is not necessary to pass the endoscope beyond the duodenal stricture and thus balloon dilation of the stricture is not necessary. The sequence of SEMS placement (biliary stent first and then duodenal stent, or vice versa) is usually not critical when the major papilla and the proximal portion of the biliary stricture are not in close proximity ( Fig. 42.6, A–C ). However, if the proximal level of the duodenal obstruction is very close to the major papilla, it is best to place the biliary stent first because the proximal end of the duodenal stent may need to be placed across the level of the major papilla to allow adequate coverage of the duodenal stricture. Whatever sequence of stent placement is chosen, it is best to avoid placing the duodenal stent across the biliary opening so that biliary access is preserved both at the time of the initial procedure and in the future should biliary stent occlusion occur.
In addition to the relationship of the duodenal obstruction to the major papilla, other factors influence the endoscopic approach. These include prior surgical palliation (gastrojejunal bypass) and clinical scenarios. The most common clinical scenario is the initial development of BO followed by later onset of duodenal obstruction. Many patients with duodenal obstruction have already undergone a palliative intervention for relief of BO—endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical. If a transpapillary stent was previously placed, then the type of stent and timing of stent placement need to be determined. For example, if a plastic biliary stent was previously placed, it is likely occluded or will become occluded and needs to be replaced. In such patients it is recommended that a metal biliary stent be placed at the time of duodenal stent placement, especially in type II patients (see Fig. 42.2 ) because the duodenal stent must cross the level of the major papilla, making subsequent biliary stent placement difficult, if not impossible, since it may not be accessible through the interstices of the duodenal stent.
Another scenario is simultaneous presentation of gastric and duodenal obstruction without prior intervention. In this scenario it is recommended that placement of a biliary SEMS be performed during the same procedure as placement of the duodenal SEMS, if possible.
An additional clinical scenario is duodenal obstruction followed by later BO. This is uncommon and could be difficult to treat endoscopically because the papilla is usually inaccessible if the duodenal stent was placed across the papilla. If the stent does not cross the papilla, the endoscope can be passed through the metal stent and ERCP performed as usual. If the stent has crossed the papilla in a type I duodenal stenosis, it may be possible to identify a normal papilla through the interstices of the stent, followed by successful cannulation of the bile duct ( Fig. 42.7 ), or to create a window within the stent at the level of the papilla using rat-tooth forceps or argon plasma coagulation. If these maneuvers fail, then either a percutaneous or EUS-guided approach to placement of a metal biliary stent is usually required, as described earlier.
Finally, when considering endoscopic management of duodenal obstruction in the patient without clinically overt BO, prophylactic placement of a biliary SEMS should be considered, especially if there is any evidence of biliary ductal dilation by noninvasive imaging or in the presence of abnormal liver function tests that cannot be explained by other processes such as medications or presence of liver metastases.
There are several series describing successful combined biliary and endoscopic drainage. In an early study 18 patients underwent simultaneous biliary and duodenal self-expandable metal stent placement. Ten patients had prior plastic biliary stents in place. Combined metal stenting was technically successful in 17 patients. All the patients had relief of BO and 16 had a relief of gastric outlet obstructive symptoms. No immediate stent-related adverse events occurred. Median survival time was 78 days. The authors who devised the duodenal stenosis classification (see Fig. 42.1 ) achieved technically successful combined biliary and duodenal stent placement in the vast majority of patients with all three types of duodenal stenosis, though the majority of patients (46/64) had biliary stents placed at a mean interval of 107 days before duodenal stent placement; prior biliary stent placement greatly facilitates successful combined stenting in type II duodenal stenoses. However, some of these patients required RV procedures. Early adverse events occurred in 6% of patients and late complications occurred in 16%. The median survival after combined stenting was 81 days. In another series of 23 patients who had both biliary and duodenal stenoses, successful combined stenting was achieved in 91% of cases. More recently, the use of a dedicated duodenal stent with a central portion designed to facilitate passage of a biliary stent through the interstices was reported in a small number of patients. Endoscopic placement of duodenal SEMS was achieved in all, and placement of a self-expandable metal biliary stent through the mesh of the duodenal stent was technically successful in 7 (87.5%) of 8 patients. However, two of three patients with type II duodenal strictures failed bile duct cannulation and required an RV procedure. Early adverse events occurred in one patient. Median survival after combined stenting was 91 days (range 36 to 314 days).
In summary, the results of these series suggest that in experienced centers, combined biliary and duodenal stent placement for palliation can be achieved in the majority of patients, though an RV approach is required more often in type II patients. Overall survival from the time of combined biliary and duodenal stent placement is relatively short.
Since the first description of EUS-guided GE by Fritscher-Ravens et al. and the advent of the lumen-apposing stent, three EUS approaches have been developed for stent insertion: (1) direct EUS-GE, (2) balloon-assisted EUS-GE, and (3) EUS-guided double-balloon-occluded gastrojejunostomy bypass (EPASS) ( Table 42.1 ). In patients with concomitant GOO and BO, we suggest performing both EUS-GE and EUS-BD in a single session.
Direct EUS-GE | Balloon-Assisted EUS-GE | EPASS | |
---|---|---|---|
Endoscope |
|
|
|
Use of electrocautery tip–assisted LAMS (Axios or Spaxus) |
|
|
|
Use of non–electrocautery-tip-assisted LAMS |
|
|
|
The direct approach entails direct puncture of a small-bowel loop adjacent to the gastric wall using a therapeutic echoendoscope. Locating the appropriate small-bowel loop can be difficult, especially if the lumen is collapsed. Infusion of water into the small bowel may be helpful for better sonographic visualization while facilitating needle puncture. Water infusion can be performed by first passing a guidewire across the obstruction, followed by a standard ERCP catheter, which can then be used to infuse water, saline, contrast, and/or methylene blue. Care must be taken to avoid infusion of more than 500 mL of water, which can lead to the development of hyponatremia. As such, normal saline may be the preferred solution. The infusion of contrast agent has the added benefit of facilitating fluoroscopic visualization of the small bowel, and the addition of methylene blue can help with proper puncture site confirmation when blue-tinged fluid is aspirated from the fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needle. For the puncture, a 19-gauge needle should be used to allow passage of a 0.025-inch-caliber or 0.035-inch-caliber guidewire. Large-caliber guidewires are essential to provide adequate traction for GE tract dilation and subsequent stent insertion. After confirmation of puncture position via enterogram, the GE tract is dilated to facilitate stent insertion. Dilation can be performed with a variety of instruments, including bougie, balloon, needle knife, and/or cystotome. When choosing the dilation size, it is important to remember that most LAMS insertion catheters measure 10.8 Fr in diameter and over-dilation must be avoided to minimize gastroenteric leakage. Once dilation is complete, a lumen-apposing stent is inserted over the wire and deployed with sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here