Dementia: Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer Disease, Lewy Body Dementia, Frontotemporal Lobar Dementia, Vascular Dementia


The diagnosis and management of dementia in older adults presents major challenges to the clinician and to society at large. The age-related increase in prevalence of dementia combined with increasing life expectancy is expected to result in a worldwide epidemic within the next few decades. Many of the diseases underlying dementia are definitively diagnosed only at autopsy, including the most common cause of dementia, namely Alzheimer disease (AD). In addition, many neurodegenerative dementias develop without producing symptoms for many years, so-called preclinical disease. Consequently, many patients move through an early phase of illness that does not meet standard diagnostic criteria for dementia. This intermediate clinical phase is called mild cognitive impairment (MCI), reflecting the presence of significant cognitive decline minus the expected loss of function typical of dementia. As our clinical acumen improves and as public awareness of dementia increases, the number of MCI cases is also likely to increase. With this in mind, this chapter reviews the definition of dementia and MCI and discusses the commonest causes of dementia.

Standardized diagnostic criteria for dementia in epidemiologic studies reveal three groups of patients, namely, those who meet the diagnostic criteria of dementia, those who are normal, and those who cannot be classified as normal or demented. The third group of patients represents individuals with isolated cognitive deficits (usually memory) or individuals without disability related to their cognitive deficits. This group of patients includes individuals with MCI.

Mild Cognitive Impairment

Longitudinal follow-up of these patients reveals a substantially increased risk of cognitive decline and eventual “conversion” to dementia. This risk is estimated to be between 12% and 15% per year. The sensitivity and specificity of screening tools for dementia and MCI vary greatly. The more sensitive diagnostic instruments usually require more time to administer. Consequently, they are not helpful for routine screening. Current brief cognitive screening instruments, including the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) or the 7-Minute Screen, are more useful for detecting dementia than MCI when used in populations with elevated prevalence rates of dementia, particularly in the elderly. Other brief, more focused cognitive screening tools such as the Clock Drawing Test or the Time and Change Test may offer additional sensitivity in screening for dementia.

The utility of these tests in detecting MCI is less reliable. Indeed, most patients with MCI score within the normal range on the MMSE. Interview-based dementia assessments, such as the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR), provide a more sensitive means for reliable detection of MCI but may require considerably more time to administer. Another brief screening tool, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test ( www.mocatest.org ), may provide greater sensitivity in detecting MCI. The definitive diagnosis of MCI requires formal neuropsychological assessment. However, neuropsychological test batteries take several hours to administer and interpret. Therefore they are not practical as screening tools. In the hands of an experienced neuropsychologist, formal neuropsychological tests provide the most sensitive means of detecting cognitive impairment. They may also provide greater specificity in identifying the underlying cause, although there may be significant variability among neuropsychologists’ interpretations.

Neuropsychological batteries can differentiate MCI subtypes depending upon the predominant cognitive domain(s) involved. Amnestic MCI involves deficits in short-term memory localizable to mesial temporal structures. Neuropathologically, this subtype of MCI is most often associated with AD. Nonamnestic MCI includes patients with isolated nonmemory-related cognitive deficits, such as aphasia, apraxia, executive dysfunction, or agnosia. The neuropathology associated with nonamnestic MCI is more variable but also includes AD. Although detection of MCI is relatively easy, treatment of MCI remains controversial. In the largest randomized clinical trial to date, donepezil was shown to delay “conversion” of amnestic MCI to AD better than placebo or vitamin E over 18 months’ duration. Very disappointingly after 3 years of follow-up there was no difference in the rate of “conversion” nor in the severity of cognitive impairment.

Dementia

The most common feature of dementia is impairment in short- and long-term memory, with additional impairment in at least one of the following: abstract thinking, impaired judgment, other disturbances of higher cognitive function, or personality change. The disturbance causes disability in usual social, occupational, or personal function. Of course, any two cognitive domains may be involved, and memory loss is not essential for every type of dementia. The diagnosis of dementia is not made if these symptoms occur in delirium (DSM IIIR).

Although this standard definition is adequate for diagnosis of dementia, it is limited in scope. Defined in this way, the diagnosis of dementia requires disability secondary to cognitive losses. However, an 80-year-old retired businessman with progressive deficits in multiple cognitive domains, but functioning independently, may not be considered “disabled,” and therefore his condition does not technically meet the diagnostic criteria for dementia. Further refinements of diagnostic criteria, aimed at identifying the underlying neuropathologic disease process, require the presence of more specific cognitive deficits for diagnosis. For example, the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke–Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) Work Group criteria for a diagnosis of probable AD require deficits in short-term memory plus at least one additional cognitive domain. In this context, a 55-year-old businessman who can no longer work because of isolated short-term memory impairment also would not technically meet diagnostic criteria for dementia, despite having a disabling cognitive problem. Such cases should be monitored for future decline. Formal neuropsychological assessment must be considered in such cases to assess for more subtle deficits that standard bedside examination often misses. Additional diagnostic criteria may be applied to diagnose the underlying disease process once dementia is identified. In the future, there may be additional studies to improve the accuracy of diagnosis, such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein analysis for amyloid and tau proteins, and brain positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.

Various comorbidities should be assessed to address potentially treatable factors contributing to cognitive impairment. Depression is particularly important because it commonly coexists with dementia in the elderly. Often, depression may be a harbinger of impending dementia in many cases of late life onset of depression. Validated depression assessment instruments, such as Geriatric Depression Scale–Short Form or the Hamilton Depression Scale, may facilitate office screening for depression.

Certain nutritional, endocrinologic, or infectious processes must also be considered in the evaluation of the demented patient. Vitamin B 12 (cobalamin) deficiency is common in the elderly, although a specific causative relationship with dementia is not known. On rare occasions, vitamin B 12 deficiency is associated with cognitive impairment that may reverse with vitamin supplementation. Hypothyroidism is also common in the elderly, and it is associated with impaired performance on cognitive tests. Although there is no well-established association with dementia, coincident hypothyroidism may impact dementia severity. The incidence and prevalence of tertiary syphilis in the United States is now virtually zero. Therefore, routine screening for syphilis as a cause of dementia in the elderly is no longer recommended in most US population groups.

The increasing recognition of possible biomarkers for various dementing diseases may also improve diagnostic accuracy. These include various CSF protein assays, such as protein 14-3-3 in prion disease, and amyloid and tau proteins in AD. Imaging modalities such as fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET scans or ligand-based PET scans (detecting β-amyloid deposition in AD) may reveal the molecular changes in the brains of living dementia patients. However, the newer assays and brain imaging techniques still do not provide a definitive diagnosis of dementia and are not used routinely. The definitive diagnosis of most dementing illnesses requires pathologic confirmation. Therefore diagnosis of dementia currently remains largely clinical.

Dementia Management

The treatment of dementia requires pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches. We will review general treatment strategies here. The target of treatment typically falls into one or more of three interdependent factors, namely (1) cognition, (2) behavior, and (3) functional capacity. Treatment of one factor may negatively impact the other factors. The literature on dementia treatments is too expansive for full review here. More detailed discussion of specific dementia treatment strategies follows in subsequent sections.

It is imperative to recognize and treat dementia as early as possible, with a goal to maximize and preserve quality of life for both patient and caregiver. Treatment of cognitive impairment involves intervention either to reverse, slow, or delay progression of cognitive decline. For the most part, currently available pharmacologic agents prove valuable only in delaying decline, perhaps preventing more severe disability and behavior problems. Behavior problems range from disturbances of mood to psychotic symptoms, apathy to agitation, anxiety, and stereotypic, purposeless, rituals. Treatment of behavioral disturbance must address the behavior that proves disabling for the patient or the caregiver. In many cases, nonpharmacologic approaches may suffice. This may include diverting the patient's attention, changing the subject of conversation, comforting the patient affectionately, or occupying the patient with a task. Environmental manipulation, caregiver support, and day programs all provide structure and routine for the patient with behavior problems and for his or her caregiver. In cases where such interventions prove less effective for behavior management, or safety is compromised by aberrant behavior, pharmacologic treatments should be used. The chosen medication should address the primary aspect of behavior aberration, such as antidepressants for low mood and vegetative symptoms, mood stabilizers for emotional lability, or antipsychotics for psychotic symptoms and combativeness. Prevention of functional decline requires comprehensive management of both cognitive and behavioral disturbances, as well as provision of support and education to the caregiver. Routine follow-up of patients with their primary caregiver is essential to maximize quality of life for all involved.

Dementia and Driving

One of the most difficult aspects of counseling dementia patients and families relates to safety of operating a motor vehicle. Driving safety in AD is well studied, and there is clear evidence that relative risk of crashes for drivers with AD, from mild to severe stages of dementia, is greater than accepted societal standards. Drivers with MCI seem to have risk for crashes similar to teenage drivers. Several studies link driving risk with dementia severity using the CDR scale. The CDR is an informant-based scale that includes direct assessment of the patient and information given by a knowledgeable informant. The CDR scores increase from 0 (normal) to 0.5 (possible dementia) to 1.0–3.0 (mild, moderate, severe dementia). Most clinicians do not routinely use this scale in their everyday practice, and therefore translating the scale scores into everyday terms may be difficult. For practical purposes, the CDR score of 0.5 loosely translates into MCI, whereas a CDR score of 1.0 or greater translates to dementia. There may be exceptions to these findings, and further research is required to find more specific patterns of cognitive impairment that lead to driving risk. Risk of driving in non-Alzheimer dementia is relatively unstudied. However, it is safe to assume that driving risk is increased also in this population.

Alzheimer Disease

Clinical Vignette

A 75-year-old man became lost driving to his daughter's house; he was subsequently referred for cognitive evaluation. He is a retired accountant, college graduate, and competitive bridge player. The patient has no specific complaints, stating he came to the doctor's appointment because of family members’ concerns about increasing short-term memory loss. He expresses frustration with family members’ “overblown concerns,” but he acknowledges occasionally forgetting people's names and trouble finding words during conversation. He excuses his recent driving error, stating “it could happen to anyone.”

His wife paints a direful picture. She reports the patient's mentation is declining progressively. Two to three years earlier he began forgetting friends’ and neighbors’ names. Subsequently, he became increasingly repetitive and easily frustrated when she would try reminding him of recent conversation. Approximately 1 year earlier, he made mistakes with the bills and bounced several checks, prompting her to take over the checkbook. He gave up playing bridge and reading. He spends increasing amounts of time sitting in front of his computer but does not seem to be accomplishing anything. When she tries to get him to go out to visit friends or family, he refuses and, occasionally, becomes angry with her. The patient recalls becoming angry but cannot recall the details of the events. She is concerned he may be mismanaging his medications because of recent changes in blood sugar levels. When he misplaces things, such as his wallet, he accuses her of taking it. He is reluctant to let her supervise his medications. Within the past 6 months, while driving he has had trouble finding his way around town.

On examination, he appears well. His mood is good and his affect is appropriate. He is fully awake and alert. He scores 18/30 on the MMSE, losing points on orientation items, all three memory items, and on serial seven subtractions. In addition, he could not copy the intersecting pentagon figure. There was no evidence of apraxia or agnosia. His remaining neurologic examination was completely normal.

Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed mild, diffuse atrophy, bilateral periventricular/subcortical white matter “microvascular” changes, and two chronic lacunar strokes in the right striatum and cerebellar hemisphere. Thyroid, vitamin B 12 , folate, and rapid plasma reagin (RPR) studies were normal. Hemoglobin A1C was elevated.

Initially donepezil was prescribed and memantine added 6 months later. His MMSE scores remained relatively stable over the next 3 years. He never resumed bridge playing, but he is more engaged and outgoing during this time. His wife enrolls him in a day program 4 days per week. There is a gradual decline in daily activities and, 4 years later, his MMSE score is 12/30. He now requires assistance with personal hygiene and with dressing. He continues to decline slowly until entering a nursing home approximately 10 years after disease onset.

Epidemiology

AD is the most common cause of dementia in adults, accounting for approximately 5 million cases of dementia in the United States. Age-specific disease incidence increases exponentially with advancing age; the risk of development of AD doubles every 5 years, beginning at 65 years of age. AD affects approximately 50% of the population aged 85 years and older. Given the growing elderly population in developed countries, projections of future AD prevalence show a fourfold increase through 2050. Because dementia is a major factor in healthcare costs, morbidity, and mortality, the high prevalence of AD places enormous burdens on the healthcare system. In many cases, diagnosis is delayed until an advanced stage, at which point caregiver stress is already high and treatment options are limited. Of the 5 million prevalent cases, only 3 million are diagnosed and only one-third of diagnosed cases receive treatment. Of those who receive treatment, the percentage receiving adequate doses and follow-up is unknown. It is very important for clinicians to understand the natural history of AD, recognize early warning signs, implement appropriate screening and diagnostic tools, prescribe appropriate treatment, and follow patients regularly.

Pathogenesis

There is pronounced gross cerebral atrophy clearly evident on both imaging studies and postmortem. Typically, the dementia of AD preferentially affects the frontal, temporal, and parietal cortex. This is particularly evident in the temporoparietal and frontal association areas and the olfactory cortex. In contrast, other primary sensory cortical areas are unaffected. In addition, the limbic system, subcortical nuclei, and the nucleus basalis of Meynert are preferentially affected. Microscopically, there is clear loss of both neurons and neuropil. The classic findings include senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles ( Figs. 27.1 and 27.2 ). The white matter sometimes demonstrates a secondary demyelination.

Fig. 27.1, Alzheimer Disease: Pathology.

Fig. 27.2, Distribution of Pathology in Alzheimer Disease.

β-Amyloid

AD is a neurodegenerative disorder thought to result from deposition of the protein β-amyloid in the brain. β-Amyloid is formed by processing of the amyloid precursor protein (APP), a protein that may help to regulate synaptic integrity and function, possibly by regulating excitotoxic activity of glutamate. APP is encoded on chromosome 21. It is processed at the cell membrane by secretase enzymes, called α-, β-, and γ-secretases. Two known membrane-bound proteins, called presenilins, comprise the active domains of the membrane-bound γ-secretase protein: presenilin 1 and presenilin 2 are encoded on chromosomes 14 and 1, respectively. Numerous genetic mutations of the presenilin and APP genes are known to cause familial, early-onset cases of AD. The familial forms of AD account for fewer than 5% of all AD cases. The known mutations account for approximately 50% of familial AD. In all cases the genetic mutation leads to an overproduction of β-amyloid that may be the first step in the subsequent cascade of neurodegeneration.

β-Amyloid is a short fragment of the APP, typically 40–42 amino acids in length, which accumulates outside the cell during APP processing ( Figs. 27.3 and 27.4 ). The tertiary structure of the 42–amino acid fragment is a β-pleated sheet that renders it insoluble. Consequently, it accumulates slowly, over many years, in the extracellular space and within synapses. In vitro studies confirm that β-amyloid is toxic to surrounding synapses and neurons, causing synaptic membrane destruction and eventual cell death. Transgenic mouse models show a clear association between accumulation of β-amyloid fragments, formation of amyloid plaques, and development of cognitive impairment.

Fig. 27.3, Amyloidogenesis in Alzheimer Disease.

Fig. 27.4, Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis in Alzheimer Disease.

In vivo, β-amyloid fragments coalesce to form “diffuse” or immature plaques, best seen with silver-staining techniques. However, diffuse plaques are not sufficient to produce dementia; many nondemented elderly patients have substantial depositions of diffuse plaques throughout the cortex, a condition termed pathologic aging. It is when these plaques mature into “senile” or neuritic plaques that dementia becomes more likely ( Fig. 27.5, top ). Senile plaques consist of other substances in addition to β-amyloid, including synaptic proteins, inflammatory proteins, neuritic threads, activated glial cells, and other components. Unlike diffuse plaques, senile plaques are composed of a central core of β-amyloid surrounded by a myriad of proteins and cellular debris. Senile plaques are distributed diffusely in the cortex, typically starting in the hippocampus and the basal forebrain. Senile plaque formation correlates with increasing loss of synapses, which correlates with the earliest clinical sign, namely, short-term memory loss. The anatomic pattern of progression gradually spreads to neocortical and subcortical gray matter of the temporal, parietal, frontal, and, eventually, occipital cortex. Subcortical nuclei become involved relatively late in the process.

Fig. 27.5, Microscopic Pathology in Alzheimer Disease.

Neurofibrillary Tangles

The second pathologic hallmark of AD is the neurofibrillary tangle (see Fig. 27.5 , bottom). These lesions develop and conform to an anatomic pattern that correlates with the clinical syndrome; the number and distribution of tangles are directly related to the severity and clinical features of the dementia. Neurofibrillary tangles form intracellularly, consisting of a microtubule-associated protein, tau, which has a vital role in the maintenance of neuronal cytoskeleton structure and function. Tau is hyperphosphorylated in AD, causing it to dissociate from the cytoskeleton and accumulate, forming a paired helical filament protein structure. The cytoskeleton is compromised structurally and functionally, disrupting normal cell function. The most commonly used pathologic criteria for definitive AD diagnosis at autopsy require the presence of senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. Other lesions, such as Hirano bodies, are also seen in AD but have little diagnostic specificity.

Neurotransmitters

In addition to neuronal and synaptic loss, there is a gradual loss of various neurotransmitters. Acetylcholine synthesis is the earliest and most prominently affected. Most acetylcholinergic neurons arise within the nucleus basalis of Meynert in the basal forebrain (see Fig. 27.2 ). This nucleus is affected relatively early in the process; acetylcholine levels within the brain and spinal fluid of patients with AD quickly decline with disease progression. This observation supported the cholinergic hypothesis—that acetylcholine depletion results in the cognitive decline observed in patients with AD—eventually leading to the first symptomatic treatment of AD.

Risk Factors

Epidemiologic studies identify several potential risk factors for AD. The most consistent risk factors include advanced age, family history (especially in first-degree relatives), and apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotype. Other risk factors include hypertension, stroke, and fasting homocysteine levels ( Fig. 27.6 ). Because vascular risk factors are modifiable, they may affect risk reduction and treatment for patients with AD and those at risk for development of AD.

  • 1

    Advanced age is the single consistently identified risk factor for AD across numerous all-international studies. AD incidence and prevalence increase with advancing age, leading to the hypothesis that AD would develop in all individuals if they lived long enough. The true incidence in persons older than age 85 years is difficult to ascertain because of sharp decline in life expectancy. However, there are many instances of nondemented elders where no pathologic evidence of AD is found at autopsy, including in centenarians. Therefore dementia is not considered a “normal” part of aging.

  • 2

    Family history of dementia is another consistent risk factor in many studies; however, the most common form of AD occurs sporadically. Establishing accurate family history of dementia is difficult because many of these patients’ relatives may not have survived into older ages where dementia risk is greatest. Rare, early-onset, presenile (before age 65 years) forms of AD occur with an autosomal-dominant pattern of inheritance. The genetic basis for many hereditary AD forms is identified. Most mutations affect the genes that encode APP and the presenilins. Each mutation leads to increased deposition of amyloid in affected individuals, predisposing to earlier onset. Individuals with trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) also have a high deposition of β-amyloid. AD develops in all patients with Down syndrome by age 35 years.

  • 3

    ApoE genotype is another genetic risk factor ( Fig. 27.7 ). The three common allelic forms of this gene, epsilon 2 through 4, are encoded on chromosome 19. The presence of an e4 allele is associated with increased risk of AD and younger age at onset. This risk is greatly increased in e4 homozygotes. Conversely, the e2 allele appears to impart a protective, risk-lowering effect, as replicated in numerous international, population-based studies. The association between the ApoE e4 allele and AD seems to be disease specific. There is no clear association between e4 and other neurodegenerative or amyloid-based diseases.

    Fig. 27.7, Possible Factors in Development and Progression of Alzheimer Disease.

    The mechanism underlying this increased risk associated with the Apo e4 allele is not well understood but may relate to the role of ApoE in cell membrane repair. Phenotypically, the e4 cases have greater amyloid deposition than do the non-e4 cases. Although ApoE genotyping is available, it is not a diagnostic test for AD, nor is it recommended for routine testing. Most patients with AD are non-e4 carriers. ApoE genotyping is largely used in research, primarily as a biologic marker to differentiate cases. Some studies suggest differential response to medications in cases stratified by ApoE genotypes.

  • 4

    In recent years, cerebrovascular disease and vascular disease risk factors have emerged as significant risk factors for AD. The presence of stroke increases the likelihood of dementia in old age. Diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia consistently elevate relative risk of dementia across international epidemiologic surveys of AD and dementia. Moreover, multiple observational studies show reduced risk among individuals receiving treatment for these conditions. This connection between AD and cerebrovascular disease may provide an important focus for premorbid dementia prevention. It is unknown whether secondary stroke prevention reduces the likelihood of dementia or its rate of progression. Nevertheless, assessment of stroke risk factors may become increasingly important for the management of dementia patients.

Fig. 27.6, Risk Factors for Alzheimer Disease.

Clinical Presentation

The early signs of AD may be subtle ( Fig. 27.8 ). In the initial stages of AD, memory losses can be clinically distinguished from normal aging, although formal memory testing is often required to confirm suspicion of early dementia. The early signs of AD begin insidiously, progress slowly, and are often covered up by patients. Detection may be challenging even for close family members. The physician may observe changes in the patient's pattern of behavior, such as missing appointments or poor compliance with medications. It is important to discuss such issues openly with family members given the patient often cannot recall examples of memory problems. Indeed, it is common for patients to have limited insight into their deficit and for family members to initiate an evaluation for memory loss. In these early stages, patients maintain their social graces. It is not uncommon during mental status testing to discover the significant cognitive problems concealed by a patient's friendly and sociable affect. “Very pleasant” patients sometimes fool even seasoned geriatricians. The Alzheimer's Association lists 10 key warning signs of AD.

Fig. 27.8, Alzheimer Disease: Clinical Manifestations, Progressive Phases.

Commonly, AD begins with short-term memory loss, although atypical presentations sometimes develop. Often, patients have increasing forgetfulness of words and names, relying more on lists, calendars, and family members for reminders. Disorganization of appointments, bills, and medications becomes commonplace. Family members often notice increasing repetitiveness, patients asking the same question or repeating the same conversation minutes after it was completed. Patients may forget to convey telephone messages or turn off the stove, or lose track of where they place things. Moreover, their ability to recall these incidents is impaired. They “forget that they forget.” Affected individuals may become suspicious of others (e.g., thinking that misplaced items were stolen).

Language function gradually declines. Word-finding and name-finding difficulties are common even in very early stages. Naming impairment and gradual loss of comprehension, expression, or both are universal. The perception of the temporal sequence of events is affected and disorientation eventually becomes pervasive. Geographic orientation declines, first affecting patients’ ability to navigate in unfamiliar environments and later within their homes. Visuospatial skills decline and construction deficits may occur early.

Behavior and personality in patients with AD are often affected; combativeness, irritability, frustration, and anxiety become extremely common. Many patients seek medical attention only when family members are alarmed by behavioral changes, rather than because of their earlier progressive memory loss. Psychotic features may become prominent. Some patients also develop delusional thoughts and hallucinations, most commonly visual or auditory in nature. These may be benign, understated, hidden, or frightening and may lead to severe agitation. Family members may not speak freely in the patient's presence about these symptoms.

As cognitive and behavioral changes appear, the patients’ ability to maintain personal independence declines. Altered activities that may occur early include medication mismanagement, financial disorganization, burnt pots on the stove, and driving errors. Eventually patients require assistance with activities of daily living: personal hygiene/bathing, eating, dressing, and toileting. Often, by this stage, patients exhibit signs of parkinsonism characterized by midline rigidity, symmetric bradykinesia and hypokinesia, stooped posture, and shuffling stride. The risk of falling increases. Seizures occur in up to 20% of cases. Myoclonic jerks are increasingly noted in advanced stages.

Later stages of AD are characterized by loss of bladder and then bowel control, failure to recognize family members, and eventually severe akinesia, requiring total nursing care. The most common cause of death is aspiration pneumonia. On average, AD has a duration of approximately 8 years. However, this varies substantially. Some patients live 20 years or more. Nursing care marks an important endpoint for many patients and their caregivers. The most common causes for nursing home placement include behavioral problems, immobility, and incontinence.

The Alzheimer's Association provides a staging system to allow doctors and caregivers a frame of reference when discussing the patient's level of impairment and possible future progression. It is important to emphasize that not every patient will follow through these stages in the same way or at the same rate.

Differential Diagnosis

The absence of motor deficits early in AD differentiates it from most other dementias. Other dementias lacking motor signs include amnestic syndrome (Korsakoff encephalopathy), Pick disease, vascular dementia, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) dementia complex. Depression can also produce dementia-like symptoms without motor deficits. Poor concentration and short-term memory impairment result from lack of effort, disinterest, or distractibility. “Pseudodementia” due to depression is usually not progressive, and functional loss is often disproportionately severe relative to cognitive impairment ( Fig. 27.9 ).

Fig. 27.9, Treatable Dementias.

Reversible causes of dementia without motor signs include toxic and metabolic causes of chronic delirium. Chronic use of medication with anticholinergic side effects (e.g., antihistamines and tricyclic antidepressants) is a possible cause of chronic delirium that may mimic AD. β-Blockers, digoxin, H 2 blockers, and various antibiotics may also contribute to chronic delirium. Chronic mass effect, caused by a slow-growing tumor (see Fig. 27.9 ), may also produce reversible cognitive impairment.

Dementia with motor deficits includes a longer list of possibilities. Thyroid disease, vitamin B 12 deficiency, and tertiary neurosyphilis are often considered; however, these conditions rarely cause dementia and usually present with characteristic metabolic or sensorimotor symptoms.

Normal pressure hydrocephalus is a relatively uncommon condition that late in its course may be characterized by a significant dementia (see Fig. 32.2 ). Typically, these individuals present with a broad-based magnetic gait as if their feet were partially glued to the ground. Eventually these patients may become unwittingly incontinent, unaware of their loss of sphincter control as the dementing process evolves. Although these patients most often have no identifiable cause, on occasion, they have previously sustained a subarachnoid hemorrhage or meningitis leading to poor CSF reabsorption. This leads to the characteristic hydrocephalus without an associated loss of cortical mantel. A CSF shunt may lead to a remarkable improvement.

The presence of spastic hemiparesis or dysarthria raises suspicion of cerebrovascular disease. Parkinsonism is associated with Parkinson disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLBs). Progressive ataxia occurs with multisystem atrophy. Chorea characterizes Huntington disease. As AD progresses to late stages, parkinsonism often becomes evident, making clinical differentiation from other parkinsonian diseases more difficult. AD may also coexist with cerebrovascular or Lewy body (LB) pathology to produce dementia with motor signs.

Dementia may be further characterized by cortical and subcortical cognitive features, which also helps to differentiate between different dementing diseases. Subcortical features include slower mental processing, slow retrieval of information, and often significant extrapyramidal motor signs, including bradykinesia or adventitious movements.

Diagnosis

The subjective complaint of memory impairment is not useful for dementia screening because it is a common complaint in older adults. Prospective evaluation of individuals aged 65 years who have complaints of memory loss show that dementia develops in fewer than 9% within a 5-year follow-up. However, dementia develops during a 5-year prospective follow-up in 50% of patients aged 85 years who had no complaints of memory loss at baseline. Consequently, clinicians must be proactive, particularly with patients aged 85 years or older, and screen for cognitive impairment.

Proper clinical assessment requires a detailed history, preferably provided by a trustworthy, knowledgeable informant particularly a spouse or child. The history should describe the cognitive decline, in temporal sequence, from earliest suggestion of cognitive impairment to most recent events. Examination in early stages may reveal no neurologic deficits other than cognitive impairment. In later stages, or in patients with coexisting neuropathology, such as stroke, there may be motor deficits or other focal central nervous system (CNS) findings on physical examination.

Mental Status Exam

The mental status examination (see Chapter 2 ) should assess all major cognitive domains, including M emory, A ttention, L anguage, C onstruction, O rientation, P raxis, and E xecutive function (MALCOPE). Standardized global measures of cognitive function such as the MMSE are of limited diagnostic value. The widely used MMSE is relatively insensitive to the milder stages of AD. Other tests, such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test, include test items more suited to detecting earlier stages of cognitive impairment, allowing improved sensitivity for detecting MCI. Another measure, the Alzheimer Disease 8 (AD8) is an informant-based tool that may shorten screening considerably. It must be emphasized that such instruments are not diagnostic tests, and interpretation of results must take into consideration level of education, native language, and physical or sensory impairment that might affect performance.

Impaired recording of information characterizes the memory loss of early AD. The inability to record information occurs when patients cannot recall information even with practice and when given hints or cues. Additional early cognitive deficits in AD include dysnomia, reduced verbal fluency (especially in word categories), orientation to time, and construction impairment. Having the patient list as many category words as possible within 1 minute provides a test of verbal fluency. For example, patients try to list animals or words beginning with the letter s.

Clock drawing is useful when testing construction and executive function ( Fig. 27.10 ). Patients draw a clock, for example, indicating 1 : 45 on a blank sheet of paper. Their performance is observed from beginning to end, including the shape and size, number order and placement, hand size and placement, etc. The strategy (or lack thereof) used to draw the clock manifests itself readily, indicating impaired executive function in following a set of rules or organizing and executing a multistep task. When patients finish, they should try copying a clock that the examiner draws in front of them. The numbers 12, 6, 3, and 9 are placed first, and the hands drawn accurately. If construction problems exist, patients have difficulty with the copy task, as well as with the command task. If the copy is good, construction problems may not be a factor in cognitive impairment. There are many standardized, brief mental status tests like these available to clinicians. Routine use of such tests allows for longitudinal assessment and staging of dementia severity.

Fig. 27.10, Nondominant Hemisphere Cortical Dysfunction.

Additional Testing

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here