Computer-Assisted Spine Surgery—A New Era of Innovation


The idea of surgical intelligence is finally coming to fruition. The use of both computer and robotic assistance, and increasing use of the two together, has already demonstrated the promise of surgical intelligence to transform spine surgery. Offering potential improvements in surgical accuracy, reductions in postoperative complications, and decreased revision surgeries, computer assistance provides the novel ability to base decision-making support on hundreds of thousands of prior cases. Poor measures of predictive power have been found for the surgeon’s ability to predict risk and benefit of surgery. The use of patient demographic and operative characteristics when creating complex analytical models allowed for the development of frailty scores that can better predict risks and benefits for a patient. Coupling such decision-making support for surgical uses, such as rod bending angles, with the precise ability of robotics to carry out the task, continues to improve patient outcomes. To date, the use of robotics in surgery has resulted in improved screw placements and improved navigation and reduced radiation dose, length of stay, and need for revision surgeries. However, as with many novel applications of technology, an array of challenges exists. These include reliance on single-centered retrospective data and limited data sharing, limited data for rare diseases and uncommon procedures, straight line trajectories of robotic movements, high costs of computer and robotic assistance (infeasible for small centers), high learning curves, a limited set of procedures for the use of such technologies (currently mainly used for screw placements), and legal issues regarding who is at fault in case of adverse events.

Recently, robotic uses for spine surgery are expanding from screw placements to include tissue-focused uses such as tumor resections, spurred by developments in haptic feedback systems, 3D printing, and mechanical advances. Further expansion of procedure types arose for microscopic-based surgeries with augmented reality support, visualizing tool orientation with respect to the anatomy of interest with no disruptions to the surgical view. Similar technological improvements, catalyzed by 5 G, gave rise to huge advances in telesurgical robotics, with the successful demonstration of the first 12 cases in 2020. With these advances, four dominant uses for computers and robotics in spine surgery have become apparent: telesurgical robotic surgery, shared-control robots with computer navigation, augmented reality systems, and machine learning decision-making support.

Telesurgical Robotic Surgery

While previously limited by bandwidth and speed of networks, the implementation of 5 G eliminates such concerns with its high speed, high bandwidth, and low latency. Demonstrations of telesurgical spine procedures, using a one-to-many workflow, open the door for the possibility of state-of-the-art surgeons being able to reach populations otherwise unable to present to the hospital. The workflow for the first 12 cases of successful spinal robotic telesurgery is presented below.

The telesurgery (demonstrated for pedicle screw implantation on patients with fracture, spondylolisthesis, or stenosis) involved a local operative team responsible for the peripheral tasks. First, the patients were anesthetized and the robotic system registered and positioned. A motorized C-arm took 3D images that were then transmitted to a control room (in a different city) over a 5 G system. The surgeon using the robotic software chose the entry point, screw orientation, and surgical path under navigational guidance. However, the K-wire and screw placement was done by surgeons on the patient side along with all image acquisitions, positioning of tools, equipment and patient preparation, and patient tracker installation. Furthermore, any bone resection and nerve decompressions would be done on the patient side. In this way, for full telesurgical uses, further innovations to technology, including advanced robotic movement capabilities, are necessary.

Necessary future innovations to telesurgery for spine surgeries include better control, increased dependence on the master surgeon, and expansion of procedure types. Haptic feedback presents the potential for improvements to master surgeon control of the robot by mimicking hand movements. Soft tissue surgery appears to be accomplishable by the current telesurgical systems, although data does not conclusively support this; soft tissue procedural safety, however, is supported by case reports using the da Vinci Surgical System.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here