Brachial plexus injuries: adult and pediatric


Synopsis

  • Brachial plexus injuries (BPI) are characterized by many complex problems and remain a dilemma to many reconstructive microsurgeons. These complexities include: (1) diverse injury patterns; (2) disrupted anatomy; (3) unpredictable nerve degeneration and regeneration; (4) difficult physical examination and diagnosis; (5) challenging nerve surgery; (6) long rehabilitation; (7) different palliative surgeries for sequelae deformity; (8) no consensus of outcome evaluation; and (9) difficult pain management.

  • Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) is very different from adult BPI, including mechanism of injury, classification of injury, clinical evaluation, intraoperative findings, reconstructive strategy, postoperative rehabilitation and follow-up, result assessments, and pain character. It therefore presents as a separate entity for description ( Table 23.1 ).

    Table 23.1
    Differences between adult and pediatric brachial plexus injury
    Adult brachial plexus injury Obstetric brachial plexus palsy
    Popular terminology BPI
    • Two types:

    • Infantile OBPP (or NBPP, neonatal brachial plexus palsy), and

    • Child OBPP with deformity

    Etiology (mechanism)
    • Trauma, more closed injuries than open;

    • Majority caused by traction injury, mostly by motorcycle accident

    All are closed and traction injuries following delivery
    Demography All ages All are infants and children
    Incidence Increasing Reducing (improvement in obstetric care)
    Physical examination Complex Simple
    Horner’s syndrome Reliable and persistent Not reliable, not persistent
    Spontaneous recovery Less Many
    Classification of injury
    • Four levels of injury:

    • Level 1: inside the bone

    • Level II: inside the muscle

    • Level III: pre- and retroclavicular

    • Level IV: infraclavicular

    • All are level I–III injury, very rare in level IV

    • Five types of injury:

    • Type 1: upper plexus palsy (Erb’s palsy)

    • Type 2: extended Erb’s palsy

    • Type 3: entire plexus without Horner’s syndrome

    • Type 4: entire plexus with Horner’s syndrome

    • Type 5: lower plexus palsy, Klumpke palsy

    Intraoperative findings
    Patterns More in root injury (level 1)
    • Upper plexus tends to be rupture injury; lower plexus tends to be avulsion injury

    • In operated cases, type 3 or 4 more common; in nonoperated cases, type I or 2 more common

    Dissection 3 months after injury Difficult, more hazardous to dissect and expose the lower plexus Highly possible to expose the whole spinal nerves
    Vessel injury Segmental occlusion of the subclavian artery in level I, and axillary artery in level IV are common Rarely associated with vascular damage
    Degree of nerve injury In rupture injury, the gap is always more than 5 cm The gap is short (2–4 cm); high incidence of aberrant reinnervation with co-contraction following nerve repair or spontaneous regeneration
    Platysma muscle Varies in thickness Very thin or scarce
    Surgical techniques
    Priority Elbow flexion, shoulder abduction and rotation, hand sensation and finger flexion, then elbow and finger extension Hand, shoulder function, elbow flexion
    Nerve reconstruction Nerve transfers more than nerve grafts Nerve grafts more than nerve transfers
    Phrenic nerve transfer A strong neurotizer, often utilized Rarely applied, risk for severe respiratory distress
    Distal nerve transfers Often Less required
    Contralateral C7 transfer Often applied in total root avulsion Rare
    Intraoperative findings
    Postoperative immobilization 3 weeks 4 weeks
    Rehabilitation Good and cooperative Poor cooperation
    Prognosis
    Recovery after repair More expected, e.g., nerve grafts in level II rupture injury, time to achieve elbow flexion >M3, usually takes 1 year Slow and unpredictable, e.g., nerve grafts in rupture injury, time to achieve elbow flexion, usually takes 2 years
    Intercostal nerve transfer Fair result Better result
    C8 and T1 root injury Recovery, all or none Usually incomplete (some T1 function is spared)
    Intrinsic recovery following repair Never May happen
    Backup (2nd) procedure to improve results Less (less than 10%) More often ( >50%)
    Pain management Big issue Little problem

  • OBPP has two distinct phases: (1) Infant OBPP (I-OBPP); and (2) ­squelae OBPP (S-OBPP). Both have significant differences in management and prognosis, and should be discussed separately.

  • I-OBPP includes risk factors, clinical presentation, preoperative evaluation, timing of nerve surgery, surgical exploration of the brachial plexus, reconstructive strategies for nerve surgery, postoperative management, and result assessment

  • S-OBPP includes aberrant reinnervation, shoulder reconstruction, elbow reconstruction, and forearm and hand reconstruction.

Access video content for this chapter online at Elsevier eBooks+

Introduction

Clinical tips

There are significant differences between adult and pediatric BPI. Therefore, there are two different entities presented in the literature: adult brachial plexus injury and obstetric brachial plexus palsy (or neonatal brachial plexus palsy). Both should be considered separately.

Brachial plexus injury (BPI) can occur in adults and children. Although the anatomy is the same, there are many differences, including mechanism of injury, type and degree of injury, preoperative evaluation and diagnosis, surgical options, postoperative management and rehabilitation, palliative surgery for sequelae deformities, outcomes evaluation and pain management ( Table 23.1 ). Therefore, these two different entities should be discussed separately.

Over 2500 adult and 500 pediatric brachial plexus palsy patients have been treated by the authors since 1985. The following will review the author’s experience regarding both adult and pediatric BPI.

History of brachial plexus reconstruction

The evolution of brachial plexus reconstruction has undergone dramatic changes in attitude and approach throughout the past century, from recognizing the significance of root injuries on the classic presentations of upper limb paralysis, to increasing optimism in the prognosis of recovery after microsurgical reconstruction.

In the early twentieth century unpredictable results and the lack of proper documentation brought forth pessimism among surgeons who attempted surgical exploration. In Sever’s series of 1100 obstetric patients, he saw no benefits in attempted surgery as compared to conservative management. Most surgeons opted for observation in closed BPI, while exploration was only indicated in open, penetrating injuries such as those referred from casualties during the First and Second World War. It is quite astonishing that what we now consider as the “window” for nerve reconstruction in acute injuries was, in contrast, the period of waiting back then, where surgeons would delay this golden opportunity to treat patients due to the lack of published data and general misconception. Even in 1966, at the Paris meeting of the International Society for Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, they concluded that surgical repair of brachial plexus lesions could not guarantee effective and predictable results.

The advances of microsurgical repair brought forth the concept of nerve grafting to bridge two ruptured stumps of a completely disrupted nerve with minimal tension. The traditional perspective was attempting primary repair of nerve gaps through mobilization of the nerve ends and keeping joints flexed, sometimes even beyond the “critical resection length”, to avoid rupturing. Such tension would risk rupturing at the nerve coaptation site. It was then that autologous nerve grafting between two nerve stumps was introduced, and Hanno Millesi would improve the functional outcomes by applying microsurgical techniques. His contributions included (1) differentiating normal and pathological tissue under microscope, (2) minimizing inadvertent manipulation to healthy fascicles; and (3) using multiple cable grafting instead of one large diameter nerve graft to improve perfusion. This contribution would greatly influence the principles of peripheral nerve reconstruction and serve as the principle for connecting ruptured roots to target nerves.

Applications of nerve grafting in brachial plexus become limited when the proximal root is avulsed, and therefore nerve transfer using healthy, expendable donors became the next popular trend. Nerve transfer is defined as division of a healthy donor nerve and transfer to a denervated recipient nerve. In 1903, Harris and Low was the first to propose suturing the distal stump of the damaged spinal nerve to healthy contiguous nerve. In 1913, Tuttle used the anterior terminal branch of the 4th cervical nerve to repair half of the distal stump of the upper trunk in a patient with avulsed 5th and 6th cervical nerves. In 1948, Lurje suggested phrenic nerve, long thoracic nerve, medial pectoral nerve, lateral pectoral nerve, anterior rami of radial nerve, and subscapularis nerve as donor nerves for transfer to the upper trunk in an effort to restore shoulder and elbow function. Narakas termed nerve transfer as a type of neuroneural neurotization and recognized that distal nerve transfer would only benefit if the site of reconstruction was closer to the target muscle. By the 1990s, the Oberlin transfer of 10% of the ulnar nerve to the motor nerve of the biceps marked a new era for nerve transfer. Leechavengvongs found that >95% of patients achieved elbow flexion of M3 or more, with no subjective deficit in grip strength. Mackinnon modified the technique to include flexor carpi radialis, flexor digitorum superificialis, palmaris longus of the median nerve for transfer to the brachialis branch of the musculocutanaeous nerve (MCN), while specifically delineated the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) branch of the ulnar nerve to transfer to the biceps branch. Transfer of the branch to the long head of the triceps, or the medial head of the triceps to the target axillary nerve for deltoid reinnervation or transfer of the terminal anterior interosseous nerve to the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve for reinnervating hand intrinsics would become common reconstructive methods that grew popular due to operating outside of the zone of injury.

In total root avulsion (TRA) where the paucity of donor nerves on the injured side limits the options for nerve transfer, surgeons have turned to expandable nerves from the healthy side via nerve grafts to the injured side or employing functioning free muscle transplantation (FFMT) as a two-stage procedure to restore elbow and finger flexion. Gu used the contralateral C7 root to innervate the nerves of the injured side via a pedicled vascularized ulnar graft application to innervate the median or musculocutaneous nerve. Chuang used a one-stage free vascularized ulnar nerve graft to bridge the gap between the contralateral C7 and the median nerve of the affected side as a one-stage procedure, or followed with free functioning gracilis muscle transplantation as a two-stage procedure to augment finger flexion. Wang modified the CC7 transfer technique by passing the donor through the neck via the prespinal route and then directly coapting the C7 root to the lower trunk to increase chance of finger flexion, but with occasional need of humeral shortening osteotomy. Other donor nerves include the use of the contralateral medial pectoral nerve as a donor nerve to innervate the injured MCN with sural nerve graft as the bridge. Meanwhile, with the advances in microsurgical techniques, application of FFMT in brachial plexus reconstruction became popular. Gracilis myocutaneous flap is the most frequently used donor muscle, in which the overlying skin flap is used for monitoring. Donor nerves include the spinal accessory nerve, intercostal nerves, phrenic nerve, and anterior interosseous nerve neurotized by the vascularized ulnar nerve graft. Doi described a two-stage method where upon the first gracilis flap is used to restore elbow flexion and wrist extension, and the second gracilis flap is used to restore finger flexion. Such methods have gained popularity, giving the brachial plexus surgeon more options to reconstruct patients.

Adult brachial plexus injury

General principles in BPI management

Adult brachial plexus injury (BPI) is characterized by many complex problems, including (1) anatomy; (2) level of BPI; (3) diverse injury patterns; (4) unpredictable nerve degeneration and regeneration; (5) difficult physical examination and diagnosis; (6) challenging nerve surgery; (7) long rehabilitation and follow-up; (8) different palliative surgeries for sequelae deformity; (9) no consensus of outcome evaluation; and (10) difficult pain management. Many reconstructive microsurgeons show great interest, but are greatly frustrated by this field.

Clinical tips

  • The evolution of brachial plexus reconstruction has undergone dramatic changes in attitude and approach throughout the past several decades.

  • BPI has many complex issues such as anatomy, pathophysiology (level of injury, timing of operation), and surgical options.

  • Categorizing the level of BPI by "number", level I–IV is critical.

  • Timing of nerve exploration is dependent upon the degree of nerve injury. Debate between early (within one month) and delayed early (within 3–5 months after injury) nerve exploration exists. The latter is becoming more popular.

  • Clinical evaluation is the most essential step for preoperative and postoperative decision-making.

  • Imaging studies can help the diagnosis, especially for level I (root) injury.

  • Correct prediction of the level of injury can help avoid unnecessarily long incision and dissection.

Anatomy

Gross anatomy

The brachial plexus is a large plexus which has the most complex structures in the peripheral nerve system. It locates superficially between two highly mobile structures, neck and arm, causing its susceptibility to injury, especially traction injury.

The brachial plexus is formed by the anterior primary rami of the lower cervical (C5–8) and the first thoracic (T1) spinal nerves, which give motor innervation to muscles of the shoulder, including all anterior and posterior chest muscles related to glenohumeral joint movement, muscles of the entire upper limb, and sensory innervation of the entire upper limb except the skin on some parts of the medial aspect of the upper arm (T2 zone). Not infrequently, the C4 and T2 spinal nerves also contribute nerve fibers to it. Whenever the C4 contribution is large and the T1 contribution is small, the brachial plexus is called a “prefixed brachial plexus”. When the C5 contribution is small and T2 contribution is large, it is termed a “postfixed brachial plexus”. Clinically, the prefixed type is more common than the postfixed. But postfixed plexus in adult BPI has been rarely seen, probably because the injuries are either so extensive that further dissection of C8–T1 is hazardous and unnecessary, or the injuries are diagnosed not to involve C8–T1 so that further identification is also unnecessary. Each spinal nerve is formed by the joining of the ventral root (motor fibers) and the dorsal root (sensory fibers). Each root is formed by a number of rootlets which exit from each spinal cord. These separate rootlets can be defined on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with three or four bands in the upper cervical roots (C5–7) and two bands of rootlets in the lower roots (C8–T1). The dorsal roots carry sensory information to the central nervous system (retrograde afferent), while the ventral roots convey motor fibers to the muscles (antegrade efferent). The cell bodies (neurons) of the motor fibers are located in the anterior horn of the spinal cord, while the cell bodies of the sensory fibers reside in the dorsal root ganglion located within the intervertebral foramen, immediately outside the dura mater of the spinal cord. The ventral and dorsal roots carry with them an extension of the arachnoid and dura which forms the root sleeve, where the root sleeve attaches to the ventral root and ganglion to form the sheath of the spinal nerve so that the cerebrospinal fluid space does not extend beyond the intervertebral foramen. The anatomy detailed here describes the location of level I ( Fig. 23.1 ).

Figure 23.1, Anatomy and numbered level of brachial plexus injury (see the text).

The dorsal and ventral roots unite a few millimeters distal from the ganglion to form a spinal nerve, a mixed nerve, which goes through the interscalene space between the scalene anterior and middle muscles. Nerves arising from the anterior primary ramus include branch to scalene muscles (C5–8), branch to longus colli muscle (C5–8), the long thoracic nerve (C5–7), a portion of phrenic nerve (C5), and a portion of the dorsal scapular nerve (C5). The anatomy detailed here describes the location of level II (see Fig. 23.1 ).

Just out of the scalene muscles the five postganglionic spinal nerves make a first union to form the three trunks: upper (formed by C5 and C6), middle (C7 itself), and lower trunk (formed by C8 and T1 spinal nerves). Two branches are given off from the upper trunk: the nerve to the subclavius muscle and the suprascapular nerve. Each trunk divides into anterior and posterior divisions just proximal to or directly under the clavicle, retroclavicular. Lateral pectoral nerve is formed from anterior divisions of the upper and middle trunk to innervate the clavicular part of pectoralis major muscle; medial pectoral nerve is formed from the anterior division of the lower trunk to innervate the sternal part of the pectoralis major muscle. The anatomy detailed here describes the location of level III (see Fig. 23.1 ).

Infraclavicularly the nerves exchange fibers and form the second union, just distal to the clavicle, and are termed “cords”. The lateral cord is formed by the fusion of the two anterior divisions of the upper and middle trunks, containing fibers derived from C5 through C7. The posterior cord joining all three posterior divisions, containing fibers derived from C5 through C8. The medial cord is simply continuation of the anterior division of the lower trunk, containing fibers from C8 and T1. The subclavian artery becomes the axillary artery at the lateral border of the first rib. Names for the cord relationship are based on the axillary artery. Lateral and medial cords pass anterior, and the posterior cord passes posterior to the axillary artery. The cords run anterior to the subscapularis muscle, just distally behind the pectoralis minor muscle. Each cord has two or more terminal branches to the periphery. The medial and lateral cords, giving one or two terminal branches, join in a Y-shape to form the median nerve. Other main terminal branches of the cords contain the musculocutaneous nerve from the lateral cord, the ulnar nerve from the medial cord, the axillary and radial nerve from the posterior cord. The anatomy detailed here describes the location of level IV (see Fig. 23.1 ).

Numerous anatomical variations of the brachial plexus do exist and should be always kept in mind. For example, the musculocutaneous nerve may sometimes arise from the median nerve and not from the lateral cord. In some rare cases of C5–6 root avulsion, the musculocutaneous nerve is still found to be functional because part of the musculocutaneous nerve derives from the median with its origins from C7.

Microanatomy

The microanatomy or internal topography of the brachial plexus has been extensively studied and described. The monofascicular pattern is usually found in regions of: (1) the spinal nerves; (2) anterior and posterior divisions of the upper trunk; and (3) the origin of the suprascapular and musculocutaneous nerve. Marked changes in fascicular topography occur every 10 mm. It is especially true at the level of the upper trunk where interfascicular crossovers are so extensive that direct repair or repair with short nerve grafts will frequently lead to co-contractions due to aberrant regeneration of a group of muscles. This aberrant regeneration is mainly found in obstetrical brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) patients due to incomplete rupture or complete rupture but with small gaps. It is rarely seen in adult BPI, where the ruptures have longer gaps. In addition, plexus connective tissue is more abundant than neural tissue. All these factors are reasons why the results of brachial plexus nerve surgery are so unpredictable. Knowledge of the internal topography of the plexus can be helpful in connecting corresponding nerve fibers with bridging nerve grafts. However, localization within the spinal nerve to define specific axonal groups to supply specific muscles or specific branches is difficult and not practical.

Level of brachial plexus injury

Various classifications of the level of BPI have been proposed ( Table 23.2 ), for example: two levels as supraclavicular and infraclavicular ; three levels as supra-, retro-, and infraclavicular ; four levels as preganglionic root, postganglionic root, trunk and division, cord and terminal branches, etc. These numerous classifications have made the understanding of the anatomy of the brachial plexus complex and confusing. The most confusing aspect is the so-called postganglionic root ( Fig. 23.2 ). In fact, after the dorsal root ganglion, both ventral and dorsal roots continue for only a few millimeters (<5 mm) in distance and unite to become a mixed nerve where it is no longer a root. Sunderland has stated that “the term nerve root should be reserved for the paired anterior and posterior nerve roots in the spinal canal”, and that “the part of the plexus extending from the union of nerve roots to the formation of the trunks of the plexus should be referred to as a spinal nerve”. The author accepts this statement. Therefore, the components of the brachial plexus are roots, spinal nerves, trunks, divisions, cords, and terminal branches.

Table 23.2
Classifications for level of brachial plexus injury
Authors Levels Area of injury
Leffert 2 levels Supraclavicular injury (supraganglionic, infraganglionic, and sub- or retroclavicular) and infraclavicular injury
Krakauer and Wood 2 levels Supraclavicular (roots, trunks and divisions), infraclavicular (cords and branches)
Terzis 3 levels Root, supraclavicular postganglionic, infraclavicular
Ferrante 3 levels Supra-, retro- and infraclavicular
Millesi 4 levels Supraganglionic root, infraganglionic root, trunk, and cord
Alnot 4 levels Preganglionic root, postganglionic root, supra- and retroclavicular, and infraclavicular
Chuang 4 levels Inside the vertebral bone, inside the scalene muscle, pre- and retroclavicular, and infraclavicular
Narakas 5 levels Supraganglionic root, infraganglionic spinal nerve, infraganglionic trunk, retroclavicular and terminal branches
Mackinnon and Dellon 6 levels Root avulsion (preganglionic and postganglionic), trunk injury, lateral cord, posterior cord, medial cord, terminal cord branches injury
Boome 8 levels C5–6, C5–6–7, C5–6–7 posterior division, C8–T1, C5, C6, lateral and medial cord, posterior cord

Figure 23.2, (A) The drawing shows that the postganglionic root is part “a”; the postganglionic spinal nerve is part “b” from the anatomy point of view; (B) an avulsion C7 (distal stump) during dissection.

To avoid anatomical confusion, we have described brachial plexus lesions with "number", Level I–IV, instead of word descriptions (see Fig. 23.1 ). A total of 819 cases of adult BPI were included (1986–2003) in this new classification and the incidence at different levels was determined:

  • Level I injury: inside the (vertebral) bone; it is preganglionic root injury including spinal cord, rootlet, and root injury; 70% of BPI patients are unfortunately injured in this level.

  • Level II injury: inside the (scalene) muscle; it is postganglionic spinal nerve injury, located at the interscalene space proximal to the suprascapular nerve; pure level II injury is around 8%.

  • Level III injury: pre- and retroclavicular; it includes trunks and divisions; pure level III injury is about 5%.

  • Level IV injury: infraclavicular; including cords and terminal branches injury proximal to the axillary fossa; the second most commonly encountered injury, about 17%.

There are some relationships among the levels of injury:

  • 1.

    An extended-level injury on the same nerve is frequently observed: for instance, C7 injury from the root level down to the interscalene space (level I and II injury).

  • 2.

    A combined-level injury on different nerves is common: for instance, C5 and C6 spinal nerve rupture injury (level II) accompanied with C7–T1 root avulsion (level I).

  • 3.

    A skip-level injury is rare: for instance, a longitudinal skip-level injury in which C5 and C7 are injured (avulsion or rupture) but C6 is intact; a horizontal skip-level injury in which level I and level III are injured, but level II is grossly intact.

  • 4.

    Level IV injuries are usually isolated, and rarely show upward extension.

The term “supraclavicular BPI” will cover a large zone of injury, including level I, II, or III lesions.

Preoperative differentiation of supra- (level I–III) vs. infraclavicular (level IV) injury is important to avoid long incisions, unnecessary dissection and tissue damage, prolonged operative time, increased postoperative morbidity, and large scars ( Table 23.3 ). With the help of imaging studies and preoperative clinical evaluation, it is not difficult to diagnosis a level I lesion. However, when the injuries are incomplete, differential diagnosis becomes difficult.

Table 23.3
Differentiatial diagnosis (DD) between supra- and infraclavicular BPI with incomplete paralysis of shoulder and elbow
Condition Supraclavicular BPI Infraclavicular BPI DD
Isolated axillary nerve injury Impossible Yes No need to DD
Isolated musculocutaneous nerve injury Impossible Yes No need to DD
Shoulder dislocation Yes No need to DD
InfraclavicularTinel’s sign (+) + (due to nerve regeneration) + Need to DD
Muscle strength examination
(A) When supraspinatus (M0), serratus anterior (M0) Yes Impossible No need to DD
(B) When supraspinatus (M>3), serratus anterior (M>3) Impossible Yes No need to DD
(C) When supraspinatus (M<2), serratus anterior (M<2) ? ? Need to DD
(C-1) when C-PM (M>3), teres major (M>3), LD (M>3) Yes No need to DD
(C-2) when C-PM (M<2), teres major (M>3), LD (M>3) High possible level III
(C-3) when C-PM (M<2), TM (M<2), LD (M<2) High possible level II–III
Condition
Scapular fracture Potential lesion
Imaging studies Important for level I Not important
EMG, NCV important important
C-PM, Clavicular part of pectoralis major muscle; EMG, electromyography; LD, latissimus dorsi; NCV, nerve conduction velocity.

Patterns of brachial plexus injury

There are two types of characteristic lesions seen in BPI: avulsion and rupture. Both are traction injuries but with different characteristics. Avulsion refers to the nerve being torn from its attachment (proximal avulsion occurs at the spinal cord, distal avulsion at the muscle or bone edge). Rupture is a nerve injury involving a traction force on an incompletely divided nerve, causing a complete division with irregular proximal and distal ends. In avulsion injury, only one disrupted end with a coiled spring-like appearance can be seen in the operative field in the acute stage ( Figs. 23.3A & 23.4A ), or a fusiform pattern (glioma) in the chronic stage ( Figs. 23.3B & 23.4B ). If a surgeon attempts to locate the other disrupted end, a second operative wound is usually required. However, in rupture injury the two nerve ends can be visualized in the same operative wound in the acute stage ( Fig. 23.3C ), or within a big neuroma noted in the chronic stage.

Figure 23.3, The drawing shows the mechanism of avulsion (A,B) vs. rupture (C) injury.

Figure 23.4, (A) Coiled spring-like structure with irregularity of stumps of C5 and C6 avulsion (acute stage); (B) fusiform pattern neuroma (or glioma) of the distal C7 stump (chronic stage) during dissection.

Root avulsion is very common in BPI due to its weak supporting structures consisting of dura and dentate ligaments. A novel approach of performing spinal cord implantation with or without nerve graft showed unsatisfactory clinical results. This implies that in avulsion injury only one end (distal end) is available, while the other (proximal) end is absent or unsuitable for repair. “Root injury” is an obscure term which may mean avulsion from the cord (true avulsion), or rupture or stretch at rootlets or roots. Root avulsion in BPI is usually accompanied by dura tearing and a cerebrospinal fluid leak with cyst formation, called pseudomeningocele. However, in some cases the root can be avulsed at its origin with an intact dura cone (called “avulsion in situ ”). The nerve root may remain inside the spinal canal or at the dural orifice, giving a grossly normal appearance or loosening with curvature of the spinal nerve at the time of surgical intervention despite established paralysis. Most often, however, the entire avulsed root, including ventral, dorsal roots, and ganglia, retracts and migrates downward to the interscalene or pre­clavicular region ( Fig. 23.2B ).

Pathophysiology and degree of nerve injury

Timing of nerve exploration is dependent upon the degree of nerve injury. The degree of peripheral nerve injury can be classified into neuropraxia, axonotmesis, and neurotmesis (Seddon classification ) or grade 1–5 injury (Sunderland classification ). Seddon’s axonotmesis or Sunderland’s second-degree injury starts to have wallerian degeneration at proximal and distal stumps. Seddon’s neurotmesis or Sunderland’s third- to fifth-degree injury has the potential for aberrant reinnervation after nerve regeneration. In Sunderland’s fourth- or fifth-degree injuries, only nerve repair can succeed in restoring continuity, but in first-, second- or third-degree injuries, spontaneous recovery, complete and incomplete, may occur.

Timing of brachial plexus exploration

There are five possible time points for brachial plexus exploration and repair:

  • 1.

    Immediate repair or repair within days or weeks

  • 2.

    Early repair within a month

  • 3.

    Delayed early repair within 3–5 months

  • 4.

    Late repair more than 6 months

  • 5.

    Chronic repair more than one year

There is rarely an argument for immediate exploration after penetrating injury by sharp objects for direct nerve repair. Some surgeons also advocate exploration of the BPI as early as possible for adult closed BPI for its advantages, including easy diagnosis of root avulsion and avoidance of difficult dissection through scarring. However, such early exploration is not recommended by most brachial plexus surgeons. In cases of closed BPI, the degree and extent of injury are difficult to judge soon after injury and are often underestimated. The benefits of waiting usually outweigh the advantages of early surgery.

Clinical evaluation

Etiology of adult brachial plexus injury

BPI may be caused by trauma (open or closed type), compression, tumor, infection, inflammation, toxins, and other etiologies.

Patient history

Patient history should include mechanism of injury, conscious level at the time of trauma, associated injury (such as head injury, fracture, open wound, chest injury, vascular injury), kinds of previous surgical intervention (such as chest intubation, cervical spine surgery), and characteristics of pain. This information helps to determine the degree and extent of injury and the need for surgical intervention. Mechanism of injury (e.g., upward or downward traction and with or without rotation) is not easily detected due to the patient’s loss of consciousness or amnesia for the accident. A history of shoulder dislocation or glenoid fracture may have a high incidence of level IV injury, whereas a history of cervical spine injury or fracture may cause a level I root injury. Artery rupture and repair imply the site of nerve injury. For instance, arm traction by rolling machine or conveyor belt often causes an open wound in the axilla, extensive ecchymosis around the shoulder and chest (due to rupture of axillary vessels), and level IV BPI. Segmental thrombosis of the subclavian artery is usually associated with C8–T1 root injury. History of rib fracture and chest intubation may preclude intercostal nerve transfer because of a higher failure rate. Extreme causalgia with or without a phantom limb is often seen in cases of root avulsion in lower-root (C8–T1) avulsion as they contain the richest sympathetic fibers. The pain character, like an electric shooting, continues for short duration for seconds, followed by spontaneous relief and recurrence. Extreme causalgia is also a major factor for poor outcome due to poor rehabilitation. Sometimes a partial Brown–Sequard syndrome (hemitransection of the spinal cord with ipsilateral upper motor neuron lesion below the level of lesion, and contralateral abnormal sensation to pain and temperature which may not be at the same level) is also noted in the level I injury.

Preoperative evaluation and diagnosis

Most adult BPIs are closed injuries. Accurate assessment of the extent and severity of the injury in closed BPI is difficult. Clinical evaluation is still essential and is the most important step in establishing the diagnosis of site and degree of injury, and determining the treatment and prognosis. A brachial plexus chart (left and right formats, Fig. 23.5 ) outlining the possible injury should be completed before definite brachial plexus surgery. This chart is filled at the initial examination, usually performed at 2 months after injury. The chart is also useful for follow-up evaluations allowing comparison of clinical pictures.

Figure 23.5, Special charts for evaluation of the brachial plexus injured patient, (A) for the right and (B) for the left upper limb.

Motor examination

Muscle-by-muscle examination should be completed in a distal-to-proximal fashion and recorded, using the British Medical Research Council (MRC) scale (M0–5). We have modified the motor evaluation system, adding more detailed differentiation: M5, strength against four fingers (examiner) resistance; M4, against one finger, resistance for longer than 30 seconds; and M3, against gravity ( Table 23.4 ). M4 is recognized as useful muscle strength. The action of each muscle should be examined separately in relation to the movement of a single joint. Although there is no single muscle innervated by a single spinal nerve, some muscle palsy can give specific information related to the level of the injury. For instance:

  • 1.

    Diaphragm palsy implies C4 and very proximal C5 (level I) injury.

  • 2.

    The levator scapulae muscle lies anterior to the trapezius muscle in the neck, and can be more easily detected than the rhomboid muscles, which are covered by the trapezius muscle. Both levator scapulae and rhomboid muscles are innervated by the same nerve (dorsal scapular nerve, or C4 and C5). Preservation of its function in upper plexus or total plexus injury may imply C5 is a rupture injury (level II) with an available proximal stump.

  • 3.

    Serratus anterior muscle: The long thoracic nerve has two portions: the upper portion originating from C5 and C6, and the lower portion from C7. The upper portion is responsible for scapular protraction, and the lower portion is important for scapular stabilization. Positive anterior traction of the scapula (shoulder protraction test) shows that at least C5 is ruptured after branching to the long thoracic nerve, so the proximal C5 is available for transfer. Scapular winging is observed only when the lower portion is denervated, but isolated C7 root avulsion is rarely seen in adult BPI. In pure C5–6 level I injury, the lower part of the muscle is still functional. The result of spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve is much superior in the reconstruction of total root avulsion.

  • 4.

    Clavicular and sternal portions of the pectoralis major muscle: The major pectoral muscle can be separated into two parts: clavicular and sternal parts. The clavicular part is innervated by upper and middle trunks or its divisions (lateral pectoral nerve), while the sternal part is innervated by the lower trunk (medial pectoral nerve). An incomplete or complete paralysis of the clavicular part of the pectoralis major muscle may imply at least level III or more proximal lesion.

Table 23.4
British Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and Chuang modification
British MRC scale
Motor scale Sensory scale
  • M0 No contraction

  • M1 Flicker (trace of contraction)

  • M2 Active movement with gravity eliminated

  • M3 Active movement against gravity

  • M4 Active movement against gravity and resistance

  • M5 Normal (full) power

  • S0 No sensation

  • S1 Pain sensation

  • S2 Pain and some touch sensation

  • S3 Pain and touch with no overreaction

  • S3+ Some two-point discrimination

  • S4 Normal sensation

Chuang modification
Motor scale Sensory scale
M4 Active movement against examiner’s one-finger resistance ≥30 seconds S2+ Pain and touch with overreaction
M5 Active movement against examiner's four-finger resistance

Sensory examination

Sensory evaluation should include sensory tests and elicitation of a Tinel’s sign. Sensibility tests include pain and temperature appreciation, static and moving two-point discrimination, constant touch, and vibration. However, performing complete sensory tests in BPI is both unnecessary and illogical because we are examining the dermatomal distribution from spinal nerves, not the cutaneous distribution. Pinprick test from areas of normal to abnormal sensation to map out the area of sensory disturbance is sufficient for most brachial plexus-injured patients. Sensory grading is based on the British MRC scale (S0–4), modified by adding a grade for sensory overreaction (S2+) (see Table 23.4 ). Such sensory evaluations can give some clues about the level and degree of BPI.

The Hoffman–Tinel’s sign is an important clinical sign to determine the location of a neuroma or to track the regeneration of the injured nerves. Palpation or percussion at the neck, at the supraclavicular Erb’s point (clavicular insertion of the sternocleidomastoid muscle), at the infraclavicular coracoid process of the scapula, or at the route of different nerves along their course may induce an electric current sensation (like pins and needles) running down to the shoulder or the hand (positive Tinel’s sign). If the Tinel’s sign remains at a fixed point, which means retardation of its progression, surgical exploration is warranted. If the Tinel’s sign advances from supraclavicular to infraclavicular and distally to the arm or forearm at successive examinations, observation is recommended, as this may indicate a Sunderland third-degree lesion. A weak or absent Tinel’s sign in the neck region usually indicates total root avulsion.

Horner’s syndrome (miosis, ptosis, enophthalmos, and anhidrosis) is a sign of sympathetic nervous system disturbance. It indirectly implies avulsion of the T1 and C8 roots because the sympathetic fibers from the T1–2 sympathetic ganglia are quite close to the preganglionic fibers of T1 and C8. This syndrome may regress with time. It is a more reliable sign in adult BPI, but less accurate in obstetric traction injury.

Plain X-ray and imaging studies

Clinical tips

  • Direct multiplanar imaging capabilities and superior soft tissue contrast have turned MRI into the primary imaging tool for BPI evaluation.

  • The MRI protocol for brachial plexus includes MRI myelogram(2D), FIESTA (3D), Cor (coronal) T1, Cor STIR, Sag (sagittal) T1, Sag STIR, Ax (Axial) T1, and Ax STIR and DWI (diffusion-weighted imaging) techniques to delineate the level of BPI injury.

Plain X-rays of the chest and cervical spine are required. The chest X-ray should include inspiration and expiration views to exclude diaphragmatic palsy. Cervical spine X-rays are evaluated for any fracture of the transverse process, spinous process, or vertebrae body.

Cervical myelography and computed tomography (CT) myelography can provide valuable information related to the level I injury of the brachial plexus. However, in recent years these studies have been gradually replaced by noninvasive MRI. The most useful MRI technique for the evaluation of a possible level I lesion is the three-dimensional (3D) fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA). These 3D source data are reconstructed along the planes of ventral and dorsal rootlets using a curve planar reformat technique to demonstrate the respective rootlets in a better perspective. Other MR techniques help in the imaging of the whole brachial plexus, notably of level II ( Fig. 23.6 ). Abnormal posterior paraspinal muscles on contrast-enhanced MRI is also one of indirect signs of root avulsion.

Figure 23.6, (A) Right C5-T1 avulsion cysts on the coronary view using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) three-dimensional (3D) fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA) technique, (B) on the sagittal view, using MRI 3D FIESTA and curve planar reformat techniques; and (C) MRI cervical spine myelogram on the same patient. (D) MRI 3D, coronal view, avulsion cyst of the left C7, and (E) axial view for comparison. (F) MRI 3D diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) techniques to see the level II spinal nerves.

Electrodiagnostic studies

Clinical tips

  • Electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) include three components: sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV), and needle electromyography (EMG).

  • EDX are useful for differential diagnosis between demyelinating conduction block (Sunderland first-degree injury) and axon loss lesions (Sunderland second- to fifth-degree injuries)

  • Before Wallerian degeneration, the distal stump remains capable of conducting action potentials (within 2 weeks); the EDX during this period is useless.

  • Most adult BPI have axonal loss without accompanying focal demyelination; however, less frequently concomitant demyelination is present (especially in shoulder dislocation which is reduced within 2 hours).

  • Amplitude of CMAP (in MNCV study) is the most useful component for quantifying the amount of axon loss: amplitude in SNCV and fibrillation in EMG tend to overestimate; amplitude of MNCV (CMAP) tends to underestimate the severity of axon loss.

Electrodiagnostic studies, mainly consisting of nerve conduction studies (NCS) and needle electromyography (EMG), are used to localize the lesion and to assess its severity. For the NCS, only amplitudes of the sensory nerve action potentials (SNAP) and compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) are of value. Both SNAP and CMAP amplitudes provide a good indication of the degree of axon loss, or in contrast, the number of survival axons capable of conducting impulses. Sensory NCSs assess the function of the postganglionic portion of the sensory pathway. Therefore, abnormally low SNAP amplitudes indicate a ganglionic or postganglionic lesion. Conversely, SNAP amplitude that remains normal in a complete paralysis of limb implies pure level I lesion (root avulsion). A combination of un-elicitable CMAPs with abnormal low or absent SNAP amplitudes suggests a combined preganglionic and postganglionic lesion. To assess the major elements of the brachial plexus, NCSs of multiple nerves are usually required. These include sensory NCS of the median, ulnar, radial, musculocutaneous, and axillary nerves, as well as motor NCS of the median, ulnar, radial, musculocutaneous, and axillary nerves. The presence of fibrillation potentials on needle EMG may suggest that the lesion is at least axonotmesis. The reduction of amplitude of compound muscle action potentials during motor NCS is more reliable than the presence of fibrillation potentials to indicate axonal loss rather than a neurapraxia lesion.

Needle EMG can detect a minimal amount of motor axon loss. For a comprehensive evaluation of the brachial plexus, adequate EMG sampling of muscles is critical. In addition to muscles innervated by major terminal nerves, examination of those supplied from or proximal to the brachial plexus can help to localize the lesion. These include the rhomboid major, serratus anterior, pectoralis major (both the clavicular and sternocostal parts), latissimus dorsi, teres major, and cervical paraspinal muscles. Needle EMG can also reveal evidence of early reinnervation and chronicity of the lesion. Presence of denervation potentials (i.e., fibrillation potentials and positive sharp waves) is the most sensitive indicator of motor axon loss. However, they require about 3 weeks to develop after axon injury.

Percutaneous somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) provide far less information than comprehensive NCSs and needle EMG studies in most patients with BPI. Thus SEPs are not routinely performed. Intraoperative SEPs may be useful to determine the continuity of individual segments of the brachial plexus and roots.

Vascular injury

Absence or weakness of pulsation of the radial artery at the wrist indicates a possible vascular injury of the axillary or subclavian artery. It may further indicate the extent and severity of the trauma. Subclavian artery occlusion may indicate a level I injury, while axillary artery occlusion may be associated with a level IV lesion. Vascular injury should be taken into account when considering the use of a vascularized ulnar nerve graft for reconstruction because the ulnar artery is transferred with the ulnar nerve.

Surgical treatment and techniques

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here