Anesthesia for upper extremity surgery


Synopsis

  • Optimal perioperative anesthetic outcomes are achieved by a thorough understanding of anatomy, pharmacology, techniques, and potential complications.

  • Local anesthetics (LA) make regional anesthesia possible by preventing the propagation of nerve conduction and by inhibiting or relieving pain.

  • Ultrasound guidance in the use of regional anesthesia has decreased the need for high volumes of anesthetic.

  • Use of wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) techniques can help fast track upper extremity procedures in the operating room and clinic settings.

Access video content for this chapter online at Elsevier eBooks+

Introduction

The goal of anesthesia for hand and upper extremity procedures is to provide a comfortable and safe experience for the patient during surgery. Many options are available for anesthesia, with respective benefits and risks. The decision regarding which anesthetic technique is chosen depends on various factors, including the extent, site, and expected duration of surgery; need for sedation; general medical health of the patient, and personal preference.

General anesthesia techniques can be applied for hand and upper extremity procedures the same as for procedures elsewhere. In addition, regional anesthesia techniques can be applied for procedures involving the upper extremity when used in the proper setting and patient population. Adjunctive measures are used to augment local anesthetics to provide longer duration of action, lower risk of adverse systemic effects, and less bleeding at the surgical site.

Optimal perioperative anesthetic outcomes are achieved by a thorough understanding of anatomy, pharmacology, techniques, potential complications, and general pain management.

Anatomy

The brachial plexus arises from the ventral rami of nerves C5–8 and T1, with variable contributions from C4 and T2 ( Fig. 4.1 ). These rami unite and diverge forming the roots, trunks, divisions, cords, and terminal nerves of the brachial plexus. C5 and C6 roots form the superior trunk, C7 becomes the middle trunk, and C8 and T1 form the inferior trunk between the anterior and middle scalene muscles. The three trunks then divide into anterior and posterior divisions, coursing over the first rib and lateral to the subclavian artery. The divisions then reunite to form cords. The anterior divisions of the superior and middle trunk form the lateral cord, while the anterior division of the inferior trunk forms the medial cord. The posterior divisions of all three trunks form the posterior cord. The cords are named according to their anatomic relationship with the axillary artery. The cords then divide once again to become the terminal branches of the brachial plexus. The lateral cord gives rise to the musculocutaneous nerve and contributes to the median nerve. The medial cord also contributes to the median nerve and gives rise to the ulnar nerve and the medial brachial and antebrachial cutaneous nerves. The posterior cord becomes the axillary and radial nerves.

Figure 4.1, Brachial plexus anatomy.

Additional nerves outside the brachial plexus can be important for complete anesthesia of the upper extremity. The supraclavicular nerve (C3–4) provides sensory innervation to the “cape” of the shoulder, and the intercostobrachial nerve (T2) innervates the skin of the medial upper arm and axilla.

Knowledge of brachial plexus anatomy and the dermatomes supplied ( Figs. 4.2 & 4.3 ) enables selective regional anesthesia.

Figure 4.2, Upper extremity nerve innervation (arm pronated).

Figure 4.3, Upper extremity nerve innervation (arm supinated).

Perineurial environment

The axillary sheath is the connective tissue surrounding the neurovascular structures of the brachial plexus. It originates as a continuation of the prevertebral fascia and joins the fascia of the biceps and brachialis muscles distally. This connective tissue extends inward, forming septa between components of the plexus and creating fascial compartments for each nerve. Controversy exists regarding the ability of the septa to limit the spread of local anesthetics within the sheath. Some investigators report that these fascial compartments limit the circumferential spread of local anesthetics and that injected solutions spread longitudinally up and down the nerve and remain compartmentalized. This concept provides a rational explanation for the occurrence of a rapid and profound block of one nerve, yet partial or absent block in other nerves during brachial plexus blockade. Other investigators propose that these septa are incomplete and form small bubble-like pockets when solution is injected. They found that single injections of dye solutions into the axillary sheath resulted in immediate staining of median, radial, and ulnar nerves, despite the presence of septa. These data demonstrate that there are connections between compartments within the sheath, and may explain why single injection techniques have success rates comparable with multiple injection techniques during blockade of the brachial plexus.

Microneuroanatomy

Peripheral nerves are composed of fascicles of individual nerve fibers surrounded by endoneurium. Groups of fascicles are contained within the epineurium. As the nerve travels away from the spinal cord, fascicle numbers increase, while fascicle size decreases. The nerve roots contain large fascicles, demonstrating a monofascicular or oligofascicular pattern, while a multifascicular pattern is found more distally. While the amount of neural tissue remains constant, the amount of non-neural connective tissue increases from proximal to distal. The ratio of neural to non-neural tissue changes from 1 : 1 in the proximal plexus to 1 : 2 in the more distal plexus. The presence of non-neural tissue may explain why injections within the epineurium rarely result in neural injury.

Sonoanatomy

The shape and echogenicity of a nerve determine its ultrasound appearance. Structures that strongly reflect ultrasound waves generate large signal intensities and appear white or hyperechoic. In contrast, hypoechoic structures weakly reflect ultrasound waves and appear darker. Peripheral nerves show a mixture of hypoechoic and hyperechoic structures constituting a typical “honeycomb” structure. Hypoechoic structures seen with ultrasound correspond to neural tissue, while hyperechoic areas correlate with connective tissue. Ultrasound imaging of the proximal brachial plexus usually shows hypoechoic structures reflecting an oligofascicular pattern. Distal brachial plexus structures display a more hyperechoic, honeycomb appearance, reflecting a multifascicular pattern.

Pharmacology of local anesthetics

Local anesthetics (LA) make regional anesthesia possible by preventing the propagation of nerve conduction and inhibiting or relieving pain. LA are primarily weak bases that attach to sites of the sodium channel in nerves and prevent the movement of the sodium ion through the nerve pores, which temporarily halts nerve conduction.

Local anesthetics are classified as amides or esters, based on the chemical structure. Most local anesthetics used in regional anesthesia are amides (e.g., “-caines”). The structure of a typical local anesthetic consists of a lipophilic head, a hydrophilic tail, and a chain linking the head and tail which is either an amide or ester and determines the classification of the type of LA. Alteration of the structure of the LA affects the various actions of the LA itself and is important when making the choice of which LA to use. For example, increasing the alkyl substitution on the aromatic ring increases its lipid solubility, thereby increasing its potency. Allergic reactions to local anesthetics are more common with esters and rare with amides.

Pharmacokinetics

Local anesthetics differ from other drugs because they are directly delivered at their site of action. Efficacy depends on the amount of LA that reaches the nerve and proximity to the nerve. Diffusion of local anesthetic is dependent on the amount of connective tissue and adipose tissue that is present in the area of the block.

Toxicity

Local anesthetic toxicity has been a concern since its first use in nerve blockade. Regardless of which local anesthetic is injected, traditional methods have required large volumes for successful regional anesthesia such as with brachial plexus blockade or Bier blocks. Frequent aspiration and incremental dosing are imperative, as is communication with the patient to detect early signs of potential intravenous injection before progression to signs and symptoms of toxicity. Factors such as drug dose, rate of absorption, biotransformation, and elimination of the drug from the circulation are determinants of the plasma concentration of local anesthetics. Fortunately, one of the benefits of ultrasound guidance in the use of regional anesthesia has been the decreased need for large volumes.

High plasma levels may be a consequence of direct intravascular injection, plasma absorption, and/­or certain underlying medical conditions of the patient (i.e., hypoproteinemia in renal or hepatic disease). Elevated intravascular levels of LA may result in minor CNS symptoms such as dizziness, ringing in the ears, and may proceed to more intense symptoms of loss of consciousness, and seizures. At even higher levels, cardiac arrhythmias ensue, including complete cardiovascular collapse. Use of LA in regional anesthesia demands an appreciation of these toxicities. Understanding agent-specific toxic levels is vital – as much as the preparation for these unintended events.

Adjuncts such as epinephrine affect absorption and elimination. The use of epinephrine as a marker of intravascular injection is warranted in almost all situations. Exceptions include those cases where the vasoconstriction resulting from epinephrine may in fact compromise the blood flow to the area.

Physicians must be prepared with monitors, emergency drugs, and airway supplies to facilitate treatment of LA-related toxicity. Toxicity related to LA can include but is not limited to oxygen desaturation, hypotension, bradycardia, and seizures. The extent of toxicity is determined by the specific drug's intrinsic properties as well as the plasma level of the LA. The safety of LA is an essential aspect of regional anesthesia and is dependent on the skill of the physician, placement of the needle, the drug utilized, and patient health. All of these factors must be considered when determining the appropriate procedure and LA dose.

Bupivacaine has been in use for many years and has the highest cardiotoxicity potential due to its intrinsic properties. Although the cardiac system is generally resistant to the effects of LA, bupivacaine is the notable exception. An overdose is more likely to result in cardiovascular collapse compared with other LA. This cardiac collapse is difficult to treat traditionally with ACLS/­CPR alone. Recent case studies have demonstrated that intravenous (IV) infusion of Intralipid, an emulsified fat, may be successful in ameliorating cardiotoxicity associated with local anesthetics by acting as a “sink”.

Vasoconstrictors

With the addition of vasoconstrictors such as epinephrine or phenylephrine to the LA anesthetic solution, the systemic absorption rate of an LA can be decreased. The dose of bupivacaine increases from 3.5 to 4.0 mg/­kg. This action of epinephrine is more significant with lidocaine as the upper limit increases from 3.0 to 7.0 mg/­kg. Vasoconstrictors allow the physician to identify an intravascular injection sooner rather than later, due to the development of tachycardia with an intravascular injection. The block can be halted immediately, possibly preventing a more serious intravascular complication. Vasoconstrictors result in decreased plasma uptake and increased duration of local anesthetic effect.

LA selection

The choice of a LA depends on toxicity (as discussed previously), duration of effect, and time to onset ( Table 4.1 ).

Table 4.1
Commonly used agents in upper extremity regional anesthesia
Lidocaine Most widely used local anesthetic
Prototype amide
Can be used in almost any peripheral block
1.5% or 2% with or without epinephrine is most commonly used for surgical anesthesia
Mepivacaine Intermediate duration
Similar to lidocaine
Less vasodilatation
Ineffective as topical agent
1.5% mepivacaine is the most commonly used agent in regional anesthesia
Bupivacaine One of the most commonly used local anesthetics in regional and infiltration anesthesia
Long-acting
High quality sensory anesthesia relative to motor blockade
Most commonly used for epidural and spinal
Refractory cardiac arrest with 0.75% concentration. Interaction with cardiac Na + channels “fast in, slow out”
Disruption of atrioventricular nodal conduction
Depression of myocardial contractility
Indirect effects mediated by CNS
Limitations on total dose of bupivacaine given
Ropivacaine Developed due to cardiotoxicity related to bupivacaine
Long-acting
Slightly less potent than bupivacaine
Higher concentrations fastens its onset and density of block
Reduced CNS/­CV toxicity compared to bupivacaine

Duration is important when considering surgical times when the block is the primary anesthetic. In such instances, the longer-acting agents such as ropivacaine or bupivacaine have the distinct advantage as they often can outlast the surgery and offer the greater benefits of postoperative pain management.

Time to onset is also an important factor. Most of the time, regional anesthesia is done prior to the surgery and a fast time to onset is highly desirable. Each LA has its own time to onset or latency. Various factors can shorten this latency, including the addition of bicarbonate, higher dose, and needle location. The recent use of ultrasound allows for a more precise needle placement, which in turn allows for quicker onset.

The choice of local anesthetic affects the quality of the block, time to onset, and duration of action ( Table 4.2 ). Quicker onset generally leads to quicker clearance. Lidocaine and mepivacaine, agents with intermediate duration, have a short latency period which is further shortened by the addition of bicarbonate as mentioned above. In comparison, bupivacaine and ropivacaine, two long-acting agents used commonly in regional anesthesia, have a longer latency period, and are not able to mix with bicarbonate due to precipitation concerns. Some may consider mixing two agents together to achieve the quicker onset effect and the longer duration of anesthesia/­analgesia. These mixtures can be about 50 : 50; however, it can vary depending on the experience and training of the anesthesiologist. The toxicity of mixtures is additive and the mixture does not lower the overall toxicity.

Table 4.2
Comparative pharmacology and current use of local anesthetics
Classification and compounds pKa Non-ionized (%) at pH 7.4 Potency a Max. dose (mg) for infiltration b Duration after infiltration (min) Topical Infiltration Intravenous regional Peripheral block Epidural Spinal c
Esters
Procaine 8.9 3 1 500 45–60 No Yes No Yes No Yes
Chloroprocaine 8.7 5 2 600 30–60 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes (?)
Tetracaine 8.5 7 8 Yes No No No No Yes
Amides
Lidocaine 7.9 24 2 300 60–120 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes (?)
Mepivacaine 7.6 39 2 300 90–180 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes (?)
Prilocaine 7.9 24 2 400 60–120 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes (?)
Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine 8.1 17 8 150 240–480 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Ropivacaine 8.1 17 6 200 240–480 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes

a Relative potencies vary based on experimental model or route of administration.

b Dosage should take into account the site of injection, use of a vasoconstrictor, and patient-related factors.

c Use of lidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, and chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia is controversial and evolving (see text).

Another consideration is the differential blockade, as nerves are blocked unequally and at different rates. Nerve blockade proceeds in the following order: sympathetic nerves, pin-prick sensation, touch, temperature, and finally, motor. This is an important attribute of bupivacaine, as one can provide improved analgesia without much motor blockade in the postoperative period if an infusion is run at analgesic doses. Optimally, an LA with sensory selectivity is desired.

Regional anesthesia techniques

Regional anesthesia has been shown to be an excellent anesthetic modality for upper extremity surgery. This relates to long-lasting pain relief, reduced opioid-related side effects during the first 24 hours after surgery, and expedited hospital discharge. Despite this, many patients still receive other types of anesthesia for a variety of reasons. Alternatives to regional anesthesia include general anesthesia, monitored anesthetic care (MAC), or simple local anesthetic infiltration without blockade of the brachial plexus or selected nerves. The factors involved in determining suitability of an anesthetic include patient preference, surgeon preference, relative and absolute contraindications to regional anesthesia, as well as type of surgery. General anesthesia has been utilized for many years with a safety record that has improved significantly over the past decades. Due to respiratory depression, general anesthesia requires airway management not routine in regional anesthesia, local anesthesia or in monitored anesthetic care. Additionally, patients who undergo general anesthesia may experience hemodynamic variations that may be significant in those with cardiac disease. All patients who will undergo any type of anesthesia need to have standard ASA monitors, which include pulse oximetry, blood pressure monitoring, and electrocardiogram monitoring as well as intravascular access established in the non-operative limb.

The use of ultrasound-guided blocks has gained significant momentum in the last decade. The benefits of ultrasound include shortened time to onset, enhanced visualization of the nerve target and surrounding structures such as arteries, veins, muscle, and other soft tissues, needle visualization, visualization of the local anesthetic and its spread, and anomalies of anatomy. Combining the traditional technique of peripheral nerve stimulation with ultrasound has not demonstrated notable benefits, although that has been a common practice, particularly for difficult cases. Surprisingly, there have been no studies that demonstrate improved safety with ultrasound over the technique of peripheral nerve stimulation.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here