Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Mechanical ventilation has been used to treat neonatal respiratory failure for more than a half century. The earliest applications began as modifications of adult ventilators, treating babies of modest size and prematurity by today's standards. Most devices were time-cycled, pressure-limited ventilators. Landmark advances in respiratory care occurred in the 1970s. Antenatal corticosteroids were shown to enhance fetal lung maturity, and transcutaneous oxygen monitoring taught us much about the vulnerability of the preterm infant. The 1980s brought pulse oximetry and high-frequency ventilation, which greatly expanded the therapeutic armamentarium. The surfactant replacement era began in the 1990s and was accompanied contemporaneously by patient-triggered ventilation, real-time pulmonary graphics, and a host of pharmacologic agents. Finally, in the new millennium, the microprocessor was incorporated into neonatal ventilators to greatly expand capabilities, monitoring, safety, and efficacy. This technological revolution has extended survival to infants born extremely prematurely as well as those with severe pulmonary disease that was heretofore lethal.
Mechanical ventilation can now be provided in many permutations. Clinicians can alter target variables, waveforms, cycling mechanisms, and modes simply by adjusting a dial. This has led to the development of disease-specific strategies to deal with the wide spectrum of neonatal respiratory failure. Similar to the rapidity of change in the computer industry, advances have been rapid and are often introduced into clinical practice without much of an evidence base, causing further confusion and consternation. This chapter reviews the classification and principles of both noninvasive ventilation and mechanical ventilation, with an emphasis on nomenclature and terminology.
Although mechanical ventilation had been the primary treatment for respiratory failure in most preterm babies, there continues to be a concern that it is a major contributor to lung injury. This has led to a growing interest in noninvasive forms of respiratory support in the belief that this will reduce the need for mechanical ventilation and its associated complications. The noninvasive neonatal respiratory support modalities fall into two broad groups: single-level pressure support, such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) support, or bilevel positive airway pressure in the form of nasal small pressure difference (bilevel CPAP [BiPAP] or synchronized bilevel CPAP [SiPAP]) and in the form of nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV). NIPPV uses a high pressure difference and can be either synchronized or nonsynchronized.
When used to treat respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), CPAP prevents collapse of the alveoli at end-expiration, maintaining some degree of alveolar inflation. It thus decreases the work of breathing in accordance with LaPlace's law, in which the pressure required to overcome the collapsing forces generated by surface tension is reduced, because the radius of curvature is greater when the alveolus is partially inflated. In this way, CPAP helps to maintain functional residual capacity and to facilitate gas exchange. In addition, CPAP helps to maintain upper airway stability by stenting the airway and decreasing obstruction. It may also augment stretch receptors and decrease diaphragmatic fatigue and thus be useful in treating apnea of prematurity.
Continuous positive airway pressure is a form of continuous distending pressure (CDP), which is defined as the maintenance of increased transpulmonary pressure during the expiratory phase of respiration. When positive pressure is applied to the airways of spontaneously breathing infants, it is called continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), whereas distending pressure applied to a mechanically ventilated infant is called positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP). Thus, both CPAP and PEEP are types of CDP (although not technically a form of ventilation) that provide low-pressure distension of the lungs and prevent the collapse of alveoli at the end of expiration. Continuous distending pressure helps to maintain functional residual capacity (FRC) and thus facilitates gas exchange throughout the respiratory cycle. In addition, CPAP supports the breathing of premature infants in a number of other ways, including abolition of upper airway occlusion and decreasing upper airway resistance, enhancement of diaphragmatic tone and activity, improvement in lung compliance and decrease in lower airway resistance, increase in tidal volume delivery by improving pulmonary compliance, conservation of surfactant at the alveolar surface, and reduction in alveolar edema.
CPAP may be administered invasively through an indwelling endotracheal tube, or it may be provided noninvasively using a variety of different nasal interfaces. This is referred to as nasal CPAP (NCPAP). Single nasal prongs are usually cut from endotracheal tubes and passed 1-2 cm into one nostril with about 3 cm residing externally. Resistance along the length of the cannula adds to the loss of pressure from the other nostril. Nasal masks are now used in the belief that they reduce trauma to the nostrils. However, it is often difficult to produce a good seal without undue pressure, which may still cause injury in the region between the nasal septum and the philtrum. Short binasal prongs are available in several designs; all have two short tubes that provide the least resistance of any other nasal interface. They may be more effective at maintaining extubation and preventing reintubation than single nasal prongs as shown in a recent meta-analysis of controlled studies.
The clinical use of NCPAP in the neonate falls into one of several groups: (1) early use in resuscitation, (2) management of RDS, (3) postextubation care, (4) treatment of apnea, and (5) management of mild upper airway obstruction ( Box 65.1 ).
Delivery room resuscitation
Management of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS)
Postextubation support
Apnea
Mild upper airway obstruction
The gas mixture delivered by CPAP is derived from either continuous or variable flow ( Box 65.2 ). Continuous-flow CPAP consists of gas flow generated at a source and directed against the resistance of the expiratory limb of the circuit. Ventilator-derived CPAP and bubble or underwater CPAP are examples of continuous-flow devices, whereas infant flow drivers (flow-driven CPAP) and Benveniste valve CPAP are examples of variable-flow devices.
Ventilator-derived CPAP
Flow-driven CPAP
Bubble (underwater) CPAP
High-flow nasal cannula CPAP
Flow-driven CPAP is a prototype of variable-flow CPAP. It uses a dedicated flow driver and gas generator with a fluidic-flip mechanism to deliver variable-flow CPAP. The principle is the Bernoulli effect, which directs gas flow toward each nostril, and the Coanda effect, which causes the inspiratory flow to flip and leave the generator chamber via the expiratory limb during exhalation. This assists spontaneous breathing and reduces the work of breathing by lowering expiratory resistance and maintaining stable airway pressure. Flow-driven CPAP can be delivered using binasal prongs or a nasal mask.
Underwater bubble continuous positive airway pressure (BCPAP) is a continuous-flow system used since the early 1970s. In this method, the blended gas is heated and humidified and then delivered to the infant through a secured low-resistance nasal prong cannula. The distal end of the expiratory tubing is immersed in water, and the CPAP pressure generated is equal to the depth of immersion of the CPAP probe. It has also been proposed that chest vibrations produced by the bubbling may contribute to gas exchange. BCPAP is an effective and inexpensive option to provide respiratory support to premature babies.
Ventilator-derived CPAP is another conventional way to administer continuous-flow CPAP. The CPAP is increased or decreased by varying the ventilator's expiratory orifice diameter. The exhalation valve works in conjunction with other controls, such as flow control and pressure transducers, to maintain the CPAP at the desired level.
Sustained inflation (SI) uses pressures of 20-30 cm H 2 O for 5-15 seconds during resuscitation to recruit lung airspaces immediately after delivery and to establish functional residual capacity. Thus far, studies have failed to demonstrate a benefit of presumed lung recruitment (and a decrease in the rates of death or BPD). More randomized controlled studies are underway to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SI.
In a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing CPAP started in the immediate postnatal period in very low birth infants at risk for RDS, to support with mechanical ventilation (including 3123 babies), Subramaniam et al. found CPAP to decrease the need for mechanical ventilation and surfactant treatment and to reduce the incidence of BPD at 36 weeks and the incidence of death or BPD.
Flow of gas in excess of 1 L/min, and up to 8 L/min, through a small nasal cannula might provide some degree of CPAP. The physiologic benefits of HFNC are attributed to washout of the nasopharyngeal dead space, possible reduction of the inspiratory resistance, and provision of a degree of CPAP. However, a major problem is that the CPAP level is usually not measurable in clinical practice and has been shown to be highly variable depending on the leak at the nose and/or mouth. The cannula tips should not be more than 50% of the internal diameter of the nares to allow optimal washout of the dead space. This leak around the nasal cannula affects the measured CPAP in an in vitro study. In another study of preterm infants, a flow of 2 liters/minute generated 9.8 cm H 2 O pressure (measured by an esophageal balloon) when a nasal cannula of certain diameter was used (0.3-cm outer diameter), emphasizing the potential risk of inappropriate size selection of the nasal cannula. Utilization of this technique has increased in many units as a result of the simpler patient interface compared to CPAP, and because the use of HFNC appears to be associated with less nasal trauma. HFNC in preterm infants has been used as a primary mode of support shortly after birth, postextubation, and for apnea. In general, HFNC was no worse than CPAP in a meta-analysis of controlled trials. However, there is a paucity of evidence in the extremely preterm infant. In a large randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial, published subsequently, early (after birth) use of HFNC for primary support for RDS in infants older than 27 weeks was associated with more frequent treatment failures compared to CPAP. Additional studies are needed to demonstrate safety and efficacy for HFNC under various clinical conditions.
Methods of noninvasive ventilation include nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV), synchronized nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (SNIPPV), and synchronized bilevel CPAP (SiPAP). In all of these modalities, ventilator inflations augment NCPAP while PEEP, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), respiratory rate, and inspiratory time can all be manipulated. Terminology used to describe NIPPV is not standardized and may be confusing. SiPAP, a form of NIPPV, is also termed biphasic or bilevel nasal CPAP.
The mechanism of action of NIPPV remains unclear. It is not known whether mechanical inflations during NIPPV are transmitted to the lungs; clinical studies show contradictory results. Other trials also found no differences in tidal volume or minute volume when comparing NCPAP with SNIPPV. Similarly, there are conflicting reports on work of breathing, pulmonary mechanics, and thoracoabdominal synchrony during comparisons of NCPAP with SNIPPV.
Several studies have compared nonsynchronized NIPPV with NCPAP for treatment of apnea in premature infants and showed no advantage of NIPPV. Trials have also compared SNIPPV with NCPAP following extubation and found a significant reduction in extubation failure using SNIPPV. Studies have also assessed NIPPV as a primary strategy to treat RDS to avoid intubation. Investigators reported improved carbon dioxide removal, reduced apnea, and shorter duration of ventilation in the NIPPV group. Nonetheless, these are small studies and used sufficiently different protocols that prevent generalizable conclusions. A large randomized controlled trial consisting of more than 1000 babies of less than 30 weeks’ gestation and birth weight less than 1000 g did not show any advantage of NIPPV over CPAP either as a means of early respiratory support to treat RDS or to facilitate extubation. This is now further supported by another large multicenter study. Lemyre et al. reported a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing NIPPV to CPAP. NIPPV was associated with a reduction in the need for re-intubation, and that benefit was persistent in all the trials that synchronized NIPPV (although they used different methods of synchronization). The authors cautioned that their data were not sufficiently robust to support the added benefits of synchronization.
Other forms of NIPPV have been introduced to overcome the limited pneumatic synchrony (flow or pressure) from air leaks at the patient interface. The noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NIV-NAVA) uses a trigger that incorporates electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) by placing a probe at the gastroesophageal junction to trigger and proportionally pressure-assist each breath depending on the level of the measured diaphragmatic activity. In preclinical studies of NIV-NAVA, mechanical breaths are synchronized to the initiation, size, and termination of each patient breath. Data from clinical studies using NIV-NAVA are limited and report mainly about infant-ventilator synchrony.
The use of high-frequency ventilators with a nasal interface (high-frequency nasal ventilation, HFNV) theoretically eliminates the need for synchrony by delivering high-frequency, small tidal volume ventilation. Clinical reports of HFNV in human neonates are emerging, but no recommendations can be made yet.
Intubation with surfactant administration, followed by extubation (INSURE), is a way for surfactant administration to premature infants supported with CPAP. Dani et al. described variation in the threshold for surfactant treatment in multiple studies using this technique of surfactant administration, with the lower threshold seemingly better. Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) describes administering surfactant to spontaneously breathing premature infants without traditional endotracheal intubation. LISA is used with the hope of decreasing exposure to mechanical ventilation and subsequently to decrease the risk for lung injury. A meta-analysis of six randomized studies, enrolling 895 infants, demonstrated that LISA was associated with a lower need for mechanical ventilation and a reduction in the composite outcome of death or BPD.
Despite its widespread use, a number of problems still persist. Nasal prongs rarely fit tightly into the nares, thus resulting in gas leak and inability to maintain a baseline pressure. The set CPAP level is rarely maintained in the pharynx. The best way to reduce nasal leak is to ensure that the prongs are of sufficient size to snugly fit the nostrils without making them blanch. A chin strap can be used to reduce leaks around the mouth, but it is not simple to use in practice.
Nasal trauma is a common problem with NCPAP especially in very premature infants. Proposed interventions include alternating binasal prongs with a nasal mask and using a nasal barrier dressing. Excessive CPAP may contribute to lung overinflation and increase the risk for air leaks. CPAP can increase intrathoracic pressure and decrease venous return and cardiac output. If set too high, CPAP may result in carbon dioxide retention and impaired gas exchange. Gastric distension is a commonly encountered problem and can be at least partially alleviated by placement of an orogastric tube.
Ferguson et al., in a meta-analysis of studies that evaluated rates of successful extubation, found that continuous positive pressure reduces extubation failure compared to head-box oxygen, NIPPV was superior to CPAP, and that HFNC had similar efficacy to CPAP. Lemyre's meta-analysis did not find enough evidence to demonstrate superiority of synchronized over nonsynchronized NIPPV after extubation, although a postextubation benefit was consistently observed in studies using synchronized NIPPV.
There are several methods of discontinuing NCPAP, including transition to HFNC. A gradual decrease in CPAP before discontinuing it was associated with success in the initial trial off NCPAP in two randomized controlled studies of very low birth weight infants.
The use of CPAP immediately after birth and selective surfactant treatment has generally replaced the practice of prophylactic or early surfactant replacement in preterm infants. This change in practice was influenced by the evidence from multiple randomized trials that used CPAP for initial stabilization and demonstrated a decreased risk of death or BPD compared to prophylactic surfactant therapy. That change in practice also included using the INSURE strategy in surfactant administration in an attempt to decrease exposure to mechanical ventilation. There has been an increase in the use of noninvasive forms of pulmonary support over time in an attempt to decrease exposure to mechanical ventilation and to decrease the risk for lung injury and potentially decrease the risk of death or BPD. The temporal increase in the use of noninvasive ventilation was demonstrated in longitudinal studies using single-center and regional datasets. Vliegenthart et al., in a single center in the Netherlands, reported a decrease in the rate of intubation and a decrease in the duration of mechanical ventilation over two epochs spanning 2004-2011, but there was no significant decrease in BPD. However, the investigators reported a significant decrease in the rate of death or neurodevelopmental impairment at 24 months.
A regional Australian evaluation that compared pulmonary support and outcomes in three periods, 1991-1992, 1997, and 2005, demonstrated a longitudinal increase in duration of noninvasive pulmonary support without a significant change in duration of endotracheal mechanical ventilation and no significant decrease in duration of oxygen therapy or in the rate of oxygen dependence at 36 weeks. In addition, survivors of that population born in the most recent time period had lower expiratory volumes, suggesting more airflow obstruction at their 8-year evaluation. Although these longitudinal evaluations have many limitations, they are not showing the hoped-for pulmonary benefits of the increased use of noninvasive pulmonary support. It seems that more work needs to be done to identify better noninvasive pulmonary support practices and the ideal patient population.
Mechanical ventilation is intended to take over or assist the work of breathing in babies who are unable to support effective pulmonary gas exchange on their own. The causes for respiratory insufficiency may be pulmonary, such as respiratory distress syndrome or meconium aspiration syndrome; extrapulmonary, such as airway obstruction or compression; or neurologic, such as central apnea or neuromuscular disease. Respiratory failure may also accompany other systemic derangements, including sepsis or shock.
Indications for assisted ventilation may be thought of as absolute and relative ( Box 65.3 ). Absolute indications include entities encountered in the delivery room, such as the failure to establish spontaneous breathing despite bag and mask ventilation, persistent bradycardia despite positive-pressure ventilation by mask, or the presence of major anomalies such as diaphragmatic hernia or severe hydrops fetalis, where there is a high likelihood of immediate respiratory failure. In the neonatal intensive care unit, sudden respiratory or cardiac collapse with apnea and bradycardia unresponsive to mask ventilation and massive pulmonary hemorrhage are two examples of absolute indications.
Failure to initiate or sustain spontaneous breathing
Persistent bradycardia despite bag/mask ventilation
Presence of major airway or pulmonary malformations
Sudden respiratory or cardiac collapse with apnea/bradycardia
High likelihood of subsequent respiratory failure
Surfactant administration
Impaired pulmonary gas exchange
Worsening apnea unresponsive to other measures
Need to maintain airway patency
Need to control carbon dioxide elimination
Medication-induced respiratory depression
Relative indications may be based on clinical judgment, such as intubating very preterm babies for prophylactic or early surfactant administration, or they may be based on an objective assessment of impaired gas exchange as evidenced by abnormal blood gases. Various recommendations exist to define respiratory failure severe enough to warrant assisted ventilation. In general, the easiest of these is the so-called “50-50 rule,” whereby hypoxemia is defined as a failure to maintain an arterial oxygen tension of 50 mm Hg with a fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.5 or greater, and hypercapnia is defined as an arterial carbon dioxide tension greater than 50 mm Hg. Some have suggested that the arterial carbon dioxide tension criterion should be coupled with a pH value, such as less than 7.25. Additional relative indications for assisted ventilation include the stabilization of infants who are at risk for sudden deterioration, such as preterm infants with apnea unresponsive to CPAP or methylxanthines; severe systemic illness such as sepsis; the need to maintain airway patency, such as meconium aspiration syndrome or tracheobronchomalacia; the need to maintain control of carbon dioxide elimination, such as persistent pulmonary hypertension; following severe hypoxic-ischemic brain injury; or for the management of drug-induced respiratory depression, such as maternal magnesium sulfate therapy, general anesthetics, or analgesics.
The two major factors that are responsible for oxygenating the blood are the fraction of inspired oxygen and the pressure to which the lung is exposed ( Box 65.4 ). The role of inspired oxygen can be understood from the alveolar gas equation (see Chapter 63 ). Oxygenation is also proportional to mean airway pressure (mean Paw), which is the average pressure applied to the lungs during the respiratory cycle and is represented by the area under the curve for the pressure versus time waveform. Inflation of the lung recruits more airspaces and exposes more of the pulmonary surface area to alveolar gas. Thus, those factors that increase mean airway pressure will, up to a certain point, improve oxygenation ( Fig. 65.1 ).
Fraction of inspired oxygen
Mean airway pressure
Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP)
Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP)
Inspiratory time
Frequency
Gas flow rate
The most direct impact comes from positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), because it is applied throughout the respiratory cycle. PEEP is the baseline pressure, the lowest level to which airway pressure falls. It is used to take advantage of LaPlace's law by maintaining some degree of alveolar inflation during expiration, thus reducing the pressure necessary to further inflate the alveolus during inspiration. There is a 1 : 1 relationship between PEEP and mean Paw; for every 1-cm H 2 O increase in PEEP, there is a 1-cm H 2 O increase in mean Paw. Excessive PEEP is potentially harmful. It may overdistend the alveoli, increasing the risk of air leaks; it may impede venous return and cardiac output; and it may decrease the amplitude, leading to carbon dioxide retention (see Complications of CPAP ).
Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) will also increase the mean Paw, but this will be proportional to the inspiratory time (T I ) or duration of positive pressure. PIP is the driving pressure and also establishes the upper limit of the amplitude. Excessive PIP poses many of the same risks as excessive PEEP, including hyperinflation (overdistension) of the lung, leading to excessive stretch of the alveolar units (baro- or volutrauma); high intrathoracic pressure with decreased venous return and cardiac output; and air leaks. Additionally, if PIP and/or PEEP is/are inadequate, there may be alveolar atelectasis and resultant damage to the lung from cyclic opening and closing of lung units, a process referred to as atelectrauma.
Mean Paw is also affected by T I and the duration of positive pressure. As T I increases, the mean Paw will also increase if all other parameters are held constant. Similarly, on machines wherein the inspiratory:expiratory (I:E) ratio is adjusted, mean Paw will increase as the inspiratory phase is lengthened or the expiratory phase is shortened. If the T I is too long, however, there is an increased risk of gas trapping, inadvertent PEEP, and air leak. If it is too short, there may be inadequate lung expansion, air hunger, and patient-ventilator asynchrony, leading to inefficient gas exchange.
Changes in the ventilator rate will have a slight effect on mean Paw. At faster rates, the mean Paw will rise, because there are more breaths delivered per minute and the cumulative area under the curve per unit of time increases. Rapid rates may result in incomplete emptying of the lung, with gas trapping, inadvertent PEEP, and lung hyperinflation.
Finally, circuit gas flow will also impact mean Paw. If the T I is held constant, more volume (and hence higher pressure) will be delivered as flow is increased. If the flow is set too high, turbulence, incomplete emptying of the lung, inadvertent PEEP, and hyperinflation may occur. If the flow is set too low, air hunger and asynchrony will result. The injurious effects of improper airway flow have been referred to as rheotrauma .
Ventilation refers to carbon dioxide removal. Its two primary determinants are tidal volume and frequency ( Box 65.5 ). Tidal volume is determined by the amplitude of the mechanical breath, or the difference between the peak (PIP) and baseline (PEEP) pressures. During conventional ventilation, carbon dioxide removal is the product of tidal volume and frequency. Clinically, this is usually expressed as the minute volume, or mL/kg/min, of exhaled gas. It is also important to consider the contribution of spontaneous breathing to minute ventilation (which is not always measured) and that pulmonary blood flow is also a key element in carbon dioxide removal, as well as oxygenation. During high-frequency ventilation, carbon dioxide removal is the product of frequency and the square of the tidal volume. Thus, small changes in amplitude may have a profound effect on arterial carbon dioxide tension (see later).
Control of ventilation during patient-triggered ventilation requires an understanding of the physiology of gas exchange. Most newborns will have intact chemoreceptors and will seek to maintain normocapnia. This is accomplished by adjustments in minute ventilation. Thus, if the amplitude is set too low, the baby will compensate by increasing the spontaneous (and hence, triggered) breathing rate. Conversely, if the amplitude is set too high, the infant's hypercapnic drive will be abolished, and the baby will “ride” the ventilator rate.
Carbon dioxide tension is affected by minute ventilation, which in turn is the product of tidal volume and frequency during conventional mechanical (tidal) ventilation (CMV). Of these two parameters, adjustment in tidal volume (by adjusting the amplitude) has a more predictable effect on minute ventilation.
Use of mechanical ventilators requires an understanding of the respiratory time constant. The respiratory time constant refers to the time required to allow pressure and volume equilibration of the lung. Mathematically, the time constant is the product of compliance and resistance. When the lung is stiff (low compliance) and has limited expansibility, such as occurs during RDS, it takes less time to fill and empty than it does at higher compliance. This pattern is clinically illustrated by observing the spontaneous breathing pattern of an infant with RDS not requiring assisted ventilation. Early on, when compliance is poor, the baby will breathe rapidly and take shallow breaths. As the disease process remits, compliance improves, and the baby breathes more slowly and takes deeper breaths.
If expiratory time is set at one time constant, approximately 63% of the change in pressure or volume will occur; if it is lengthened to three time constants, changeover will increase to 95%; and at a five time constant-length, it will approach 99%. Thus, setting the expiratory time at less than 3-5 times the length of the time constant will increase the risk of gas trapping and potentially inadvertent PEEP and alveolar rupture.
Over the past decade, newer mechanical ventilation devices have been introduced into neonatal practice and devices that are based on sound physiologic principles. The proliferation of devices and techniques has caused confusion about nomenclature and classification, which are frequently device specific. In a general sense, mechanical ventilators can be divided into two groups: those that deliver physiologic tidal volumes, often referred to as conventional mechanical ventilators, and those that deliver tidal volumes that are less than physiologic dead space, referred to as high-frequency devices, which will be discussed later.
Among conventional mechanical ventilators, it is advisable to use a simple hierarchical classification to describe devices according to the variables they utilize ( Fig. 65.2 ). These variables fall into two categories: those that control the type of ventilation (called ventilatory modalities ) and those that determine the breath type (called ventilatory modes ). Recently, Chatburn, El-Khatib, and Mireles-Cabodevila proposed a taxonomy for mechanical ventilation. This system utilizes the defining of the control variable, breath sequence, targeting scheme, and mode classification to describe what is happening. This scheme, if adopted, could eliminate the widespread inconsistencies in nomenclature and terminology that presently exist among different devices and manufacturers.
At any one time, the ventilator can control only a single variable—time, pressure, or volume. However, the same ventilatory device can operate using different control variables at different times. Ventilatory modalities can target either pressure or volume as the primary variable. Because volume is the integral of flow, volume- and flow-controlled ventilation are actually the same. When pressure is controlled, volume will fluctuate according to the compliance of the lungs, and conversely, when volume is controlled, pressure will fluctuate as a function of compliance.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here