Key Concepts

  • Obesity has reached epidemic proportions in the United States (US), as well as much of the world, with nearly 40% of American adults classified as obese.

  • Obesity results in several physiologic changes including aberrations to lung physiology and predisposes patients to obstructive sleep apnea and obesity hypoventilation syndrome.

  • Drug dosages can be challenging in obese patients because some medications are lipophilic and will need to be dosed based on total body weight while hydrophilic medications are dosed closer to ideal body weight. Many medications require specific scalers for appropriate dosing.

  • Many drugs lack large-scale trials in the obese population to guide appropriate dosing.

  • Obese trauma patients suffer greater rates of chest and abdominal injuries from blunt trauma than healthy-weight patients.

  • Bariatric surgery is the only weight loss strategy that consistently results in long-term significant weight loss.

  • Laparoscopic gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are the most common weight loss surgeries in the United States, and each presents its own short-term and long-term complications.

  • Procedures common in the emergency department (ED), such as lumbar puncture, venous access, CPR, and intubation, may be more difficult in the obese patient.

  • The increased body mass of the obese patient presents several challenges to obtaining interpretable radiographic images.

Foundations

The last several decades have seen a dramatic increase in rates of obesity in children and adults in the United States and around the world. , In 2015 to 2016, it was estimated that 39.8% of adults and 18.5% of children in the United States were obese, with as many as 7.6% of Americans classified as severely obese. , Obesity is often defined as a body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) greater than 30 (see Table 184.1 ). A range from 25 to 29 is considered overweight, and obesity can be further subdivided into grade I (BMI 30.1–34), grade II (BMI 35–39), and grade III or severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40). The obese patient presents a host of management challenges including difficulties related to size and weight but also changes in physiology, procedural challenges, and drug pharmacokinetics.

TABLE 184.1
Body Mass Index Classifications
Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. JAMA . 2014;311(8):806-814; Anast N, Olejniczak M, Ingrande J, Brock-Utne J. The impact of blood pressure cuff location on the accuracy of noninvasive blood pressure measurements in obese patients: an observational study. Can J Anaesth . 2016;63(3):298-306.
BMI WHO Classification
<18.4 Underweight
18.5–24.9 Normal Weight
25–29.9 Overweight
30–34.9 Grade I Obesity
35–39.9 Grade II Obesity
>40 Grade III Obesity a
BMI , Body mass index; WHO, World Health Organization.

a Alternative terms include Morbid Obesity and Extreme Obesity. ,

Pathophysiology

Changes to Respiratory Mechanics

Increased chest wall mass in conjunction with substantial abdominal fat mass leads to reduced lung compliance and collapse of small airways resulting in increased airway resistance ( Table 184.2 ). These changes in turn result in a decrease in functional residual capacity (FRC) leading to increased atelectasis. Obese patients also preferentially aerate the upper portion of the lung and perfuse the more dependent portions leading to ventilation perfusion (V/Q) mismatch. Each of these changes is exacerbated when the patient is supine and ameliorated when sitting upright. , ,

TABLE 184.2
Changes to Pulmonary Physiology Observed in the Obese Patient
Parameter Obesity-Related Change
Chest Wall/Abdominal Mass Increased
Lung Compliance Reduced
Airway Resistance Increased
Functional Residual Capacity Decreased
Atelectasis Increased
V/Q Mismatch Increased
Work of Breathing Increased
Oxygen Consumption Increased
CO 2 Production Increased
Respiratory Rate Increased
Safe Apnea Time Decreased

These physiologic perturbations lead to increases in work of breathing and oxygen consumption; obese patients consume 50% more oxygen than healthy-weight individuals. , Additionally, obese patients produce significantly more carbon dioxide than non-obese individuals, leading to an increased respiratory rate with a resting rate of 15 to 21 breaths per minute compared to 10 to 12 for those of a healthy weight. ,

Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an obesity-related disorder characterized by upper airway collapse during sleep. Increases in adiposity of upper airway structures leads to reduced airway caliber and reduced pharyngeal muscle tone. , Symptoms include snoring and apneic episodes during sleep, daytime sleepiness, and morning headaches. Diagnosis is usually confirmed with polysomnography. Treatment consists of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) at night and weight loss. ,

Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), or Pickwickian syndrome, occurs when the physiologic changes described in the preceding paragraph lead to increased daytime hypercarbia. The Academy of Sleep Medicine defines OHS as daytime alveolar hypoventilation (Pa co 2 > 45 when awake and at sea level) in individuals with a BMI greater than 30 when other etiologies of hypercarbia are excluded, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, mechanical respiratory dysfunction such as severe kyphoscoliosis, and neuromuscular disease. , , It is also prudent to screen for pharmaceutical and recreational substances that affect respiratory drive such as opioids, sedative-hypnotics, and alcohol. While not all, or even most, patients with OSA will have OHS, 90% of those suffering from OHS also suffer from OSA with as many as 70% with severe OHS (characterized by more than 30 apnea-hypoxia events per hour during sleep). Patients with OHS have increased rates of pulmonary hypertension, congestive heart failure (CHF), acute or chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, and mortality compared to those with only OSA. One recent study identified 600 patients in a 5-year period with OHS and noted 15% died on the index visit with another 16% dying in the approximately 3-year follow-up period.

The American Thoracic Society recently issued a clinical practice guideline regarding evaluation and treatment of OHS. They suggest that patients with sleep disordered breathing but a low/moderate (<20%) pretest probability of OHS should undergo screening with serum bicarbonate levels. Patients with bicarbonate levels over 27 mmol/L or those with a high pretest probability of OHS should undergo confirmatory testing of arterial carbon dioxide levels. They also recommend immediate treatment with noninvasive ventilation and suggest evaluation for bariatric surgery.

Changes in Pharmacokinetics

The clinician faces several challenges regarding proper medication dosing in the obese patient. The volume of distribution (V d ) of a drug is the principal factor involved in the loading dose while subsequent maintenance dosing will primarily be governed by total body clearance (Cl). The V d is affected by many factors including drug lipophilicity, plasma binding, regional blood flow, body composition, molecular size, and degree of ionization. , Hydrophilic drugs will tend to not enter adipose tissue to a great extent resulting in lower V d and will therefore tend to be dosed based upon ideal body weight (IBW). Lipophilic drugs will dissipate into fat tissue to a significant extent, leading to increases in the V d and a situation where total body weight (TBW) may be appropriately used for dose calculations. Other drug loading doses will use an adjusted body weight (ABW) where a fraction of the adipose tissue, often 30% or 40%, is utilized in dose calculations (see Table 184.3 for scalers often used in medication dosage calculations). ,

TABLE 184.3
Scalers for Various Body Weight Descriptors
Meng L, Mui E, Holubar MK, Deresinski SC. Comprehensive guidance for antibiotic dosing in obese adults. Pharmacotherapy . 2017;37(11):1415-1431.
Body Weight Descriptor Formula Example
IBW Ideal Body Weight Male: 50.0 + 2.3 (inches over 5 feet in height) 64 kg
Female: 45.5 + 2.3 (inches over 5 feet in height) 59 kg
LBW Lean Body Weight Male: (9270 × TBW) / (6680 + 216 × BMI) 79 kg
Female: (9270 × TBW) / (8780 + 244 × BMI) 65 kg
ABW Adjusted Body Weight IBW + C a × (TBW−IBW) Male, C=0.3, 92 kg
Male, C=0.4, 103 kg
Female, C=0.3, 89 kg
Female, C=0.4, 99 kg
TBW Total Body Weight Patients Actual Weight 159 kg
BMI Body Mass Index Weight × Height 56 kg/m 2

a C is correction factor, usually either 0.3 or 0.4. The example is for a 5 foot, 6 inch person (66 inches; 168 centimeters) weighing 350 pounds (159 kilograms).

Drug maintenance doses are primarily determined by Cl, the sum of contributions from each organ involved in drug metabolism or excretion. As obese patients often have increased liver and kidney mass, as well as increased renal blood flow, obesity will often affect Cl. Additionally, critically ill patients will have changes in vascular permeability, cardiac output, and hepatic and renal function that will impact both V d and Cl. Care in the emergency department (ED) will primarily involve the loading dose of a medication, but maintenance dosing may be required in departments faced with prolonged inpatient boarding where consultation with a pharmacist may be helpful.

Antibiotics

There is limited data on beta-lactam and cephalosporin use in obesity, but several trials have illustrated lower than normal drug concentrations and cure rates in obese patients when standard dosing is utilized. Until more data are available, we recommend initial dosing at the upper limit of the recommended dose and suggest extended infusion times ( Table 184.4 ).

TABLE 184.4
Dosing Recommendations for Selected Antibiotic Classes
Drug Class Dosing Recommendation
Beta-lactams/Cephalosporins Limited data, upper limit of regular dose suggested
Fluoroquinolones Limited data, upper limit of regular dose suggested
Vancomycin Load with 20–25 mg/kg TBW; subsequent dose based on peak/trough levels
Linezolid Limited data
Aminoglycosides ABW 0.4

Fluoroquinolones also have very limited pharmacokinetic data in the setting of obesity. There are insufficient data to provide clear recommendations for ciprofloxacin. Levofloxacin 750 mg/day has been shown to be effective against gram-negative infections in small studies of obese patients with preserved renal function, but further data is required before firm recommendations can be made for fluoroquinolones. Therefore, we recommend usual dosing.

Vancomycin has both increased V d and Cl in obese patients and obese patients have been found to have lower vancomycin troughs. The large V d necessitates a loading dose recommended at 20 to 25 mg/kg TBW; doses >4 g/day are associated with vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity. Variable Cl in conjunction with the large V d makes maintenance dosing difficult and it is prudent to individualize subsequent doses to peak and trough levels so as to achieve therapeutic levels but avoid nephrotoxicity. ,

Linezolid is noted to have subtherapeutic levels in obese patients, but data have not illustrated worse clinical outcomes. Expert recommendations are mixed at this time and there are insufficient data to give clear guidelines regarding linezolid dosing in obese patients; therefore, we recommend usual dosing. ,

Aminoglycosides are hydrophilic but do have an increased V d in obese patients, suggesting that the drug does distribute into fat tissue but not to nearly the same concentrations as other tissues. Limited evidence suggests dosing by ABW with a correction factor of 0.4 for the loading dose with maintenance dosing individualized for the patient. ,

Sedatives and Induction Agents

Recent studies have demonstrated that both obese and non-obese children and adults often receive incorrect anesthetic and paralytic medications, with one investigation reporting only 75% of obese patients receiving an appropriate dose of etomidate and 60% being administered the correct dose of succinylcholine. , Propofol is highly lipophilic; in fact, one of the great advantages of this drug, its short duration of action, is not due to metabolism but rather to rapid redistribution into muscle and fat. Historically there has been controversy regarding the appropriate scaler for propofol, but recent research has suggested that using ABW with a correction factor of 0.4 results in successful sedation ( Table 184.5 ). , , Although etomidate is ubiquitous in the ED, little research has been performed regarding optimal dosing in obese patients with some experts recommending TBW and others reduced doses. , One recent study did demonstrate IBW resulted in successful sedation, but currently there is insufficient evidence to give a strong recommendation regarding which scaler should be used. At this time we suggest using TBW to dose etomidate. Similarly, there is a paucity of data for ketamine in the obese patient; however, given its large V d , most experts suggest reducing from TBW with some suggesting IBW and others LBW. We suggest utilizing LBW. ,

TABLE 184.5
Dosing Recommendations for Sedatives, Neuromuscular Blocking Agents, and Neuromuscular Blocking Reversal Agents
Drug Dosing Recommendation
Propofol Limited data, avoid TBW
Etomidate Limited data, suggest TBW
Ketamine Limited data, avoid TBW, suggest LBW
Succinylcholine TBW
Rocuronium TBW
Vecuronium TBW
Sugammadex TBW

Neuromuscular Blocking Agents

Succinylcholine, a depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent, is cleared via breakdown by plasma cholinesterase (PCE). Obese patients have increased levels of PCE proportional to total body weight and therefore succinylcholine (1.5 mg/kg IV) should be dosed by TBW. , The non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents most commonly used in the ED, vecuronium and rocuronium, have both been shown to have prolonged duration of action when administered by total body weight. , One recent trial illustrated that using 0.6 mg/kg IBW of rocuronium did not result in slower time of onset than when using higher doses in obese patients. However, given that the only complication of higher doses of non-depolarizing agents is prolonged duration of action and underdosing risks suboptimal intubating conditions, we recommend using TBW for these medications. Sugammadex rapidly reverses paralysis due to the non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (rocuronium and vecuronium). Recent research suggests the possibility of using IBW; however, as most trials investigating sugammadex are conducted in the operating room at the end of surgical cases as opposed to situations where it would likely be utilized in the ED, the end points of these trials allow for a time to onset that would be inappropriate in the emergency department. , ,

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here