Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis


Key Concepts

  • Hallmarks of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) include unilateral limb pain and swelling, though these findings can be subtle and nonspecific.

  • Patients with low pretest probability (PTP) can have DVT ruled out in the ED with a negative D-dimer or venous ultrasound (US), patients with high PTP can have DVT ruled out in the ED with a negative D-dimer and venous US.

  • Three-point US evaluates the leg veins proximal to the knee and has a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 95% for proximal DVT when performed by a certified sonographer. A negative three-point ultrasound in a patient with a moderate or high PTP for DVT should have a D-dimer test or repeat venous ultrasound within 7 days. A single, whole-leg ultrasound excludes DVT in all pretest probabilities.

  • Anticoagulation for DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE) can be achieved with a direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), unfractionated heparin or, in rare cases, an alternative anticoagulant. For DVT and most PE, DOACs are as effective as and safer than the combination of heparin and warfarin.

  • The treatment of isolated calf vein DVT is controversial, and it is reasonable to withhold anticoagulation in favor of a repeat venous ultrasound within 7 days and close follow-up.

  • Distal superficial vein thrombophlebitis can adequately be treated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and warm compresses, but proximal superficial vein thrombophlebitis should be treated with anticoagulation.

  • Most patients with DVT distal to the iliofemoral region can be safely treated as outpatients as long as close follow-up and access to anticoagulant medications is assured.

  • PE can present asymptomatically, with dramatic clinical symptoms, or with sudden cardiac death. Even the most common symptom, dyspnea, is absent in a quarter of patients.

  • The first step in the evaluation of possible PE is determining whether testing for PE is indicated.

  • The patient’s pretest probability for PE, as determined by clinical gestalt or a validated score (e.g., the Wells Score) dictates the approach to objective testing for PE.

  • Patients with low gestalt pretest probability and a negative PERC rule may incur more harm than benefit if testing for PE (including D-dimer) is performed.

  • Patients with non-high pretest probability (e.g., Wells Score ≤ 6) can have PE ruled out with a negative D-dimer.

  • The D-dimer threshold can be adjusted according to the patient’s age or the pretest probability of PE. The formula for age adjustment is Age × 10 ng/mL. Using an adjusted D-dimer threshold reduces the need for imaging by about 10% to 15%.

  • Patients with high pretest probability or a positive D-dimer require imaging. For most patients, including pregnant women, computer tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the imaging test of choice.

  • For pregnant women, the decision to undergo any testing for PE should be shared with the patient. To minimize fetal radiation exposure, diagnostic testing for PE should start with a combination of D-dimer and bilateral lower extremity venous ultrasound.

  • For patients diagnosed with PE, typical resuscitative measures can be harmful. Endotracheal intubation and positive-pressure ventilation can decrease preload and precipitate cardiac arrest. Excessive intravenous fluid administration can lead to worsening right ventricular distention and left ventricular compression.

  • Patients with PE should be risk stratified using a combination of vital signs, CTPA, echocardiography, and troponin. High-risk PE is defined by hemodynamic instability, intermediate-risk by right ventricular dysfunction, and low-risk by the absence of either.

  • Patients with high-risk PE should be treated with thrombolysis or thromboembolectomy unless contraindicated.

  • Patients with intermediate-risk PE are usually not candidates for thrombolysis but may be candidates for catheter-directed or low-dose systemic thrombolysis.

  • About 25% of patients with low-risk PE can be treated as outpatients.

Foundations

Background and Importance

Each year more than 500,000 people are diagnosed with venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). PE is the third most common cause of cardiovascular death in the United States. PE and DVT occur equally in women and men, and while PE and DVT can occur in any age group, older patients have a much higher incidence, at 1/10,000 in people 20 to 30 years old and 1/100 in people greater than 80 years old. However, even this high incidence grossly understates the importance of PE and DVT to the practice of emergency medicine. Because the clinical presentations of PE and DVT are highly variable, with symptoms and signs that overlap with many common ED diagnoses, PE and DVT are frequently on the differential diagnosis for patients who present with chest pain, dyspnea, syncope, tachycardia, hypoxemia, leg pain, edema, and other nonspecific complaints. The wide demographic range and nonspecific clinical presentation of PE and DVT is why as many as 1 in 10 emergency department (ED) patients are evaluated for possible DVT or PE. Emergency clinicians must, therefore, be knowledgeable and judicious in their approach to PE and DVT.

As illustrated in Figure 74.1 , venous thrombosis occurs when the propensity of blood to coagulate overwhelms endogenous anticoagulant and fibrinolytic systems. Numerous factors associated with the classic triad of venous injury, venous stasis, and hypercoagulability have been associated with an increased risk of VTE in epidemiologic studies ( Table 74.1 ). Emergency clinicians should be aware of factors that might increase a patient’s propensity to clot and should consider these factors when determining whether a patient’s clinical presentation warrants an evaluation for VTE. Important factors include older age, prior history of VTE, active cancer, recent surgery or trauma, recent hospitalization longer than three days, limb immobility, and estrogen use (especially if initiated in the past three months). Thus, the age and comorbid illness of the population served by an ED determine the frequency of VTE diagnoses.

Fig. 74.1, Diagram of clotting in a lower extremity vein. Note how the clot forms in and around the cusps of the valve.

TABLE 74.1
Epidemiologic Risk Factors and Physiologic Findings for Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department Setting
Risk Factor from Epidemiologic Study Mechanism Strength of Association With PE or DVT in ED Patients
Surgery
(within past 4 weeks, requiring general anesthesia)
Inflammation
Venous Injury Stasis
++++
Trauma within past 4 weeks requiring hospitalization Inflammation
Venous Injury Stasis
+++
Older age Hypercoagulability
Stasis
Association with other diseases of aging (e.g., cancer, surgery)
+++
Prior PE or DVT Hypercoagulability
Stasis (due to valvular damage)
++
Active cancer Hypercoagulability ++
Inherited or acquired thrombophilia Hypercoagulability ++
Limb or generalized immobility Stasis ++
Estrogen Hypercoagulability ++
Pregnancy or postpartum Hypercoagulability +
Recent travel Stasis Minimal
Connective tissue disease Inflammation Unknown
Inactive cancer (considered in remission) Hypercoagulability Not significant
Smoking Inflammation and hypofibrinolysis Not significant
Family history of VTE Hypercoagulability (inherited predisposition) Not significant
Symptoms Mechanism Strength of association with PE or DVT in ED Patients
Hemoptysis Infarction +++
Pleuritic chest pain Lung infarction +
Dyspnea V/Q mismatch +
Syncope Obstruction of pulmonary outflow tract +
Sudden onset of symptoms Vascular obstruction Not significant
Substernal chest pain Presumed cardiac ischemia Not significant
Signs
Unilateral leg or arm swelling Venous obstruction ++++
Unexplained hypoxemia (Sa o 2 < 95% [sea level])
V . / Q .
mismatch
+++
Pulse rate > 100 beats/min Cardiac stress, baroreceptors ++
Note: Differences between epidemiologic risk factors and risk factors for a diagnosis of PE or DVT in the ED reflect the ability of these factors to differentiate patients who present with symptoms consistent with PE or DVT who are ultimately diagnosed with PE or DVT from those who have PE or DVT excluded after their ED workup.
PE , Pulmonary embolism; DVT , deep vein thrombosis; ED , emergency department;
V . / Q .
, ventilation/perfusion ratio; Sa o 2 , saturation of oxygen measured on pulse oximetry.

However, not all epidemiologic risk factors are associated with an increased likelihood of an ED diagnosis of VTE ( Table 74.1 ). For example, pregnant women are five times as likely to develop VTE as nonpregnant women of the same age, but only 4% of pregnant women tested for VTE in the ED have the diagnosis, compared to 12% of nonpregnant patients. This is because emergency clinicians have a low threshold to test pregnant patients for VTE. Similarly, travel is associated with a small increase in the absolute risk of VTE, but a history of travel often leads emergency clinicians to test for VTE, so travel does not seem to be associated with VTE in patients tested in the ED. The decision to initiate an evaluation or treatment for VTE should be based on an analysis of the risk PE poses to the patient weighed against the risk imparted by testing and treatment.

As many as 50% of patients diagnosed with PE have no apparent clinical risk factors for PE or DVT at the time of diagnosis. However, the lack of a risk factor known at the time of the ED diagnosis does not mean that an occult risk factor does not exist. Between 4% and 11% of patients with PE or DVT will receive a new cancer diagnosis within 1 year of VTE diagnosis, depending on whether the VTE event is provoked or idiopathic. Genetic or acquired hypercoagulable states are often unknown until a patient has their first thrombotic event. Patients who develop PE or DVT after exposure to heparin may have heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, a hypercoagulable state leading to VTE. While the presence of an occult risk factor may only become known after a patient leaves the ED, a thorough history may suggest occult cancer (e.g., unintentional weight loss) or recent exposure to heparin that would enable the emergency clinician to adjust their assessment of a patient’s risk of PE or DVT.

Anatomy, Pathology, and Pathophysiology of VTE

The venous anatomy of the lower extremity is divided into the deep and superficial systems ( Fig. 74.2 ). The superficial venous system consists primarily of the greater and short saphenous veins and perforating veins. Distal greater saphenous vein thrombi are often referred to as superficial thrombosis, but greater saphenous clots near the connection with the femoral vein should be referred to as DVT. The deep venous system includes the anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and peroneal veins, collectively called the calf veins. Venous thrombi isolated to the calf veins are referred to as distal DVT. The calf veins join together at the knee to form the popliteal vein, which extends proximally and becomes the femoral vein at the adductor canal. Venous thrombi in the popliteal or more proximal veins are referred to as proximal DVT. The femoral vein (previously known as the superficial femoral vein), is joined by the deep femoral vein and then the greater saphenous vein to form the common femoral vein, which subsequently becomes the external iliac vein at the inguinal ligament. Venous thrombi in the proximal femoral and iliac veins are known as iliofemoral DVT.

Fig. 74.2, Diagram of the leg vein anatomy relevant to the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. A three-point ultrasound includes the common femoral, femoral and popliteal veins. A whole-leg ultrasound adds the greater saphenous, posterior tibial, peroneal veins and the gastrocnemius vein.

Knowledge of the venous anatomy is also important for the performance and interpretation of ultrasound of the leg veins. Compression ultrasound, including point-of-care ultrasound, is typically limited to the common femoral, femoral, and sometimes popliteal veins. Duplex ultrasound includes compression ultrasound of the proximal veins as well as Doppler ultrasound of the calf veins. The anatomic location of a DVT also influences prognosis because proximal DVT are less likely to lyse spontaneously, more likely to embolize, and are associated with a greater risk of long-term complications such as post-thrombotic syndrome.

Although 90% of DVT form in leg veins, clots can also form in the arm, around venous catheters, pacemaker wires, or other foreign bodies such as inferior vena cava filters. Other sites of venous thrombosis rarely encountered in the ED include the jugular, ovarian, mesenteric, renal, portal, hepatic, cerebral, and retinal veins.

DVT formation typically begins when monocytes expose blood to tissue factor on their surfaces. This process overwhelms natural anticoagulant and fibrinolytic mechanisms and leads to the aggregation of red blood cells, platelets, and fibrin in the venous sinuses or cusps of the lower extremity deep veins. The formation of a DVT causes vascular congestion which, in turn, causes veins to dilate and valves to become incompetent. The lack of forward venous blood flow leads to venous stasis and further thrombus propagation.

When a DVT embolizes, it flows proximally through the venous system toward the vena cava and the heart. In 3% of cases, a portion of the clot will remain in the right atrium or ventricle, a condition known as clot-in-transit. Clots that pass through the heart and enter the pulmonary arterial circulation are called PE. A PE can be described as saddle if the clot is visualized across the bifurcation of the main right and left pulmonary arteries ( Fig. 74.3A ). More distal PE are typically described according to their anatomic location. Clots may lodge in a main pulmonary artery ( Fig. 74.3B ), or in a lobar ( Fig. 74.3C ), segmental ( Fig. 74.3D ) or subsegmental pulmonary artery branch. PE may extend from a proximal artery into distal branches, and PE frequently fragment, lodging in multiple arterial branches simultaneously.

Fig. 74.3, Diagnostic computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) scans showing: (A) saddle PE, (B) right main pulmonary artery PE, (C) right lobar PE, (D) right segmental PE. The pulmonary arteries are enhanced by contrast, but PE appear as filling defects, as indicated by the yellow arrows.

The physiologic effect of an obstruction in the pulmonary vasculature is variable. Small, subsegmental PE often lyse spontaneously and may be clinically inconsequential. Subsegmental thrombi that do not spontaneously lyse but obstruct blood flow to the lung’s periphery can cause pulmonary infarction, necrosis, pleural inflammation, and severe pleuritic pain. The right ventricle normally pumps through a pulmonary vascular tree with a low resistance to flow, and young individuals without cardiopulmonary disease can tolerate at least 30% obstruction from a clot with minimal symptoms or signs. Larger PE can cause an acute increase in pulmonary artery pressure due to a combination of mechanical obstruction and chemically mediated vasoconstriction of unobstructed pulmonary arteries. Increased right ventricular (RV) afterload (i.e., when the pulmonary artery systolic pressure exceeds 40 mm Hg) can lead the thin-walled right ventricle to dilate and become hypokinetic. As illustrated in Figure 74.4 , with normal PA pressures, the systolic RV is crescentic in cross-section and the left ventricle (LV) is circular. However, with increased PA pressures, the systolic RV dilates asymmetrically towards the intraventricular septum, compressing the LV into a “D” shape on cross-section. This can lead to underfilling of the left ventricle, decreased cardiac output, decreased coronary artery perfusion, myocardial ischemia, circulatory collapse, and death.

Fig. 74.4, Diagram showing the relationship of the right ventricle (RV) and left ventricle (LV) under conditions of normal pulmonary artery (PA) pressure and elevated PA pressure (i.e. in the setting of an acute PE). Note how, in the bottom right illustration, when PA pressure is elevated the RV dilates asymmetrically compressing the left ventricular septum. This can lead to decreased filling, decreased cardiac output, myocardial ischemia, hypotension and death.

Deep Vein Thrombosis

Clinical Features

Hallmarks of DVT include unilateral limb pain and swelling, though these findings can be subtle and nonspecific. Patients may report only mild cramping or a sense of fullness in the calf. The clinical signs of DVT may include edema, erythema, and warmth of the affected extremity, tenderness to palpation along the distribution of the deep venous system, dilation of superficial collateral veins, and rarely a palpable venous cord. Figure 74.5A shows a patient with a left leg DVT. To illustrate the difficulty of differentiating DVT from alternative diagnoses based on clinical examination, Figure 74.5B shows a patient with a ruptured Baker cyst in the left leg. Fever suggests an alternative diagnosis, such as cellulitis. Because the left iliac vein is vulnerable to compression by the left iliac artery (May-Thurner syndrome), leg DVT occurs with a slightly higher frequency on the left. Bilateral leg DVT is found in fewer than 10% of ED patients diagnosed with DVT.

Fig. 74.5, Clinical photograph showing patients with (A) deep vein thrombosis of the left leg and (B) ruptured Baker cyst of the left leg. Note the similar clinical appearance with both patients presenting with leg pain and swelling.

More than 90% of upper extremity DVT occur in the presence of an indwelling catheter or similar device. Therefore, arm pain or swelling in the same arm as a catheter, infusion device, or pacemaker wire should raise suspicion for DVT. In the absence of a device, upper extremity DVT tends to occur in the dominant arm of young athletes, a condition known as Paget-Schroetter syndrome. Paget-Schroetter syndrome is an effort-induced form of thoracic outlet syndrome. Repetitive motion of the arm in the setting of hypertrophied scalene muscles or congenital cervical ribs causes compression of the subclavian vein and DVT.

Differential Diagnosis

Box 74.1 lists differential diagnoses for DVT. Venous insufficiency that causes congestion and inflammation is a common alternative diagnosis for DVT, especially since venous insufficiency increases the risk of DVT. Cellulitis is another common consideration. However, in a patient with clinical evidence of cellulitis, the frequency of concurrent DVT is only about 3%. Injuries to the gastrocnemius muscle or Achilles tendon can mimic the pain and swelling of DVT but are usually distinguished by history. Enlargement of the synovial membrane (Baker cyst) can cause popliteal pain and rupture of the cyst into the calf muscles causes inflammation that appears clinically similar to DVT. Spontaneous calf muscle hematomas can also cause pain and inflammatory changes. Many patients with systemic edema (e.g., from heart failure) will have asymmetrical swelling that raises concern for DVT.

BOX 74.1
Differential Diagnosis for DVT

  • Venous insufficiency causing congestion and inflammation

  • Cellulitis

  • Muscle or tendon injury

  • Baker cyst (including ruptured synovial membrane)

  • Hematoma

  • Arterial insufficiency and claudication

  • Asymmetrical edema (e.g., due to congestive heart failure or liver disease)

Diagnostic Testing

Pretest Probability Estimation

Diagnosis of DVT (and PE) starts with an estimation of the pretest probability (PTP). PTP estimation helps guide the choice of diagnostic tests, the interpretation of results, and the need for follow-up testing. However, in the eyes of many clinicians the noninvasive, nonionizing nature of testing for DVT makes PTP estimation for DVT less critical than it is for PE. PTP estimation may be accomplished by the clinical gestalt of an experienced clinician or in conjunction with a clinical decision tool.

The most commonly used and well-validated clinical decision tool for DVT is the Wells DVT score ( Table 74.2 ). Because the components of the Wells DVT score have been incorporated into clinical gestalt over the years since the score was developed, Wells DVT score and clinician gestalt have approximately equal diagnostic accuracy, and either method is acceptable. Although the Wells DVT score can categorize patients as low, intermediate or high PTP, the decision to test with a highly sensitive D-dimer or venous US is dichotomous. Therefore, it is easiest and appropriate to combine low and intermediate probability groups and consider the PTP of DVT to be low (−2 to 2 points) or high (≥3 points).

TABLE 74.2
Wells Score for Deep Vein Thrombosis
Adapted from: Wells PS, Anderson D, Bormanis J, et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet . 1994;350:1795-1798.
Clinical Feature Score
Active cancer (treated within the previous 6 months or currently receiving palliative treatment) 1
Paralysis, paresis, or recent plaster immobilization of the lower extremities 1
Recently bedridden (for ≥3 days or major surgery within 12 weeks requiring general or regional anesthesia) 1
Localized tenderness along the distribution of the deep venous system 1
Entire leg swollen 1
Calf swelling at least 3 cm larger than on the asymptomatic side (measured 10 cm below the tibial tuberosity) 1
Pitting edema confined to the symptomatic leg 1
Collateral superficial veins (nonvaricose) 1
Previously documented deep vein thrombosis 1
Alternative diagnosis at least as likely as deep vein thrombosis −2
A score < 2 indicates that the probability of deep vein thrombosis is low.

The Wells DVT score has not been validated in pregnant women, but the LEFt score has been validated in a study of 157 pregnant women. It consists of 1 point in case of left ( L ) leg suspicion, 1 point for edema ( E ), and 1 point if the suspicion occurred during the first trimester ( Ft ) of pregnancy. A LEFt score of 0 or 1 indicates low PTP. Although not validated, an approach that substitutes the LEFt score for the Wells score in pregnant women is reasonable.

Laboratory Evaluation

The D-dimer test measures the enzymatic breakdown of cross-linked fibrin from any intravascular thrombus. A normal quantitative D-dimer concentration in a patient with a low PTP (e.g., Wells score −2 to 0) excludes proximal DVT with a sensitivity of approximately 92% and a specificity of 45%. This sensitivity is slightly lower than the sensitivity for PE, possibly because DVT tend to be subacute, and therefore less prone to release D-dimer, when diagnosed. Box 74.2 lists conditions other than PE and DVT that elevate the D-dimer. The specificity, and therefore the clinical usefulness, of the D-dimer may be low in patients with these conditions.

BOX 74.2
Factors Other Than VTE Associated With Positive D-Dimer Results
Note: Warfarin use is associated with false-negative D-dimer results

  • Female sex

  • Advanced age

  • Black or African American race

  • Cocaine use

  • Immobility (general, limb, or neurologic)

  • Hemoptysis

  • Hemodialysis

  • Malignancy (active)

  • Rheumatologic disease (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus)

  • Sickle cell disease

  • Pregnancy and postpartum state

  • Recent surgery (within 1 month)

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared numerous D-dimer assays to aid in the diagnosis and exclusion of VTE, mostly using a cutoff of greater than 500 ng/mL to define abnormal. However, some D-dimer assays have cutoffs other than 500 ng/mL, so it is important for emergency clinicians to know the threshold considered positive in their practice setting.

Studies find that the need for venous US can be decreased by 5% by using a threshold for a positive D-dimer that is adjusted according to the patient’s age using the following formula:


Age × 10 ng / mL

Thus, an 80-year-old patient with a PE unlikely or non-high PTP can have DVT (or PE) excluded with a D-dimer concentration less than 800 ng/mL. This strategy maintains a diagnostic sensitivity near 95% but increases the percentage of patients who can have DVT excluded without venous ultrasonography. The safety of this strategy has not been tested with D-dimer assays with abnormal thresholds different than 500 ng/mL.

An alternative to age adjustment is to apply a Bayesian approach, by which the threshold for a positive D-dimer is increased based on PTP. Using this strategy, patients with low PTP can have DVT ruled out using a threshold of 1000 ng/mL (for a test that normally uses 500 ng/mL). This approach has been shown to safely increase the proportion of patients with a negative D-dimer results from 50.9% to 56.1%.

Radiographic Evaluation

An expertly performed and interpreted positive venous ultrasound is sufficient to confirm the diagnosis of DVT. Several approaches to performing venous US are commonly used, and the emergency clinician should be aware of the US protocols used in their practice setting. Whole-leg US is the criterion standard and combines compression US of the proximal veins with ultrasound of the calf and saphenous veins. Whole-leg US is associated with a venous thromboembolism event rate at 3 months of 0.5%. A single normal whole-leg ultrasound excludes DVT regardless of PTP.

Three-point US, also called compression US, images the common femoral, femoral, and popliteal veins. Three-point US, when performed by a certified sonographer and interpreted by a board-certified radiologist, has a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 95% for DVT. A negative three-point venous duplex ultrasound excludes the diagnosis of DVT in patients with low PTP. However, for patients at high risk, a negative three-point ultrasound is inadequate to exclude DVT as a single test. Patients with high PTP can have DVT ruled out in the ED with a combination of a negative three-point ultrasound and a negative D-dimer. A patient with high PTP, an elevated (or not performed) D-dimer, and a negative three-point ultrasound should be referred for a repeat venous US in 5 to 7 days to ensure their symptoms are not due to a distal (calf vein) DVT that later propagates proximally.

Bedside point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by a trained emergency clinician is 90% to 95% accurate compared to radiology-performed US. Test characteristics are highest for femoral veins and lowest for saphenous and popliteal veins. POCUS of the upper extremity is not well studied and should be performed by radiology when necessary.

Ultrasound cannot be used to rule out iliac or pelvic vein thrombosis. For this, venography (typically CT) is needed. When duplex ultrasound is not available, the decision to empirically anticoagulate while awaiting the availability of ultrasound imaging should be based on the PTP of DVT, and the risk anticoagulation poses to the patient. Generally, patients with low PTP do not need empirical anticoagulation while they wait for diagnostic imaging.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can evaluate the pelvic vasculature and inferior vena cava (IVC), which is not possible with ultrasound. Although CT venography can also visualize the pelvic veins and IVC, the accuracy varies across studies, and CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation. MRI does not produce ionizing radiation. Thus, MRI is a reasonable option to evaluate the pelvic veins of patients at high risk for pelvic vein thrombosis (e.g., a patient with gynecologic malignancy and bilateral leg swelling). Its use is limited by cost, availability, and patient tolerance. In only about 20% of patients with pelvic DVT is the clot isolated to the pelvic veins. Therefore, even when pelvic vein DVT is suspected, venous US is still the recommended first test.

Figure 74.6 provides a diagnostic flowchart for DVT that incorporates PTP. Patients with low PTP can have DVT ruled out in the ED with a negative D-dimer or venous US. Patients with high PTP can have DVT ruled out in the ED with a negative D-dimer and venous US. Patients with high PTP, a positive D-dimer, and a negative venous US of the proximal veins should have a follow-up ultrasound one week after ED discharge to look for the propagation of a distal DVT that might not have been detected during the initial ED visit.

Fig. 74.6, Flowchart algorithm showing the diagnostic approach to a patient with possible acute deep vein thrombosis. DVT , Deep vein thrombosis; −, test negative; + , test positive; US , ultrasound.

Management

Patients with a positive ultrasound and patients with high PTP for whom imaging will be delayed (e.g., until the next day) should have anticoagulation initiated in the ED at the time of diagnosis, unless contraindicated.

Therapeutic anticoagulation for PE and DVT is the same. Options for initial anticoagulation are listed in Table 74.3 . Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are as effective as warfarin at preventing recurrent VTE and are associated with fewer bleeding events, and in particular, intracranial bleeding events. They are well tolerated by patients and do not require injections or monitoring. The DOACs rivaroxaban and apixaban do not require bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and are the first-choice anticoagulants for most patients with DVT.

TABLE 74.3
Anticoagulant Options for the Initial Treatment of DVT or PE
Anticoagulant Initial Dose Restriction Time to Peak
Unfractionated heparin 70–80 U/kg, then 17–18 U/kg/h, IV Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia 1 hour
Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg q12h or 1.5 mg/kg q24h subcutaneously Creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min 3 hours
Dalteparin 200 unit/kg daily or 100 unit/kg q12h subcutaneously Creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min 4 hours
Fondaparinux 5–10 mg subcutaneously Creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min 3 hours
Rivaroxaban 15 mg by mouth q12h for 21 days with food Creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min 2–4 hours
Apixaban 10 mg by mouth q12h × 7 days followed by 5 mg by mouth q12h with or without food Creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min 3–4 hours
DVT , Deep vein thrombosis; PE , pulmonary embolism.

A prior version of this text listed the incorrect dosage for Rivaroxaban in Table 74.3 . This electronic version has since been corrected. Please contact Elsevier Customer Support to request a sticker to correct your printed version.

For patients with active cancer, LMWH is associated with a lower risk of VTE recurrence than warfarin, but emerging evidence suggests that DOACs are also safe and effective in this population. , Concern about the ability to reverse anticoagulation should not dissuade an emergency clinician from starting DOAC therapy. Reversal agents are available for all DOACs ( Box 74.3 ), and bleeding that does occur on DOAC therapy tends to be less severe than bleeding on warfarin. , However, DOACs are either contraindicated or not studied for the treatment of DVT associated with pregnancy, severe renal failure, liver failure, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, and high-risk PE.

BOX 74.3
Reversal Agents for Anticoagulants

Anticoagulant Reversal Agent
Heparin Protamine sulfate
Warfarin Fresh frozen plasma
4-Factor prothrombin complex concentrate
Vitamin K
Dabigatran Idarucizumab
Rivaroxaban, Apixaban Andexanet alfa

Thrombolysis, whether systemic or catheter-directed, for DVT not associated with limb ischemia has not been shown to improve mortality or post-thrombotic syndrome (pain, paresthesia, induration, swelling, discoloration, and ulceration of the leg after DVT) but does increase the risk of bleeding. ,

Compression stockings can no longer be advocated routinely for DVT, as the data do not support a reduction in post-thrombotic syndrome. However, the reduction in post-thrombotic syndrome may depend on how soon after DVT diagnosis the patient starts wearing the stockings, and some studies do show an improvement in quality of life, so some patients may find them beneficial. , Patients should be encouraged to ambulate after anticoagulation for DVT to reduce the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome.

Assessing Bleeding Risk

Prior to initiation of anticoagulation for VTE, emergency clinicians should assess the patient’s risk of bleeding. This is particularly important for patients with calf vein DVT without PE or isolated subsegmental PE without DVT, for whom withholding anticoagulation may be reasonable. Absolute and relative contraindications to anticoagulation are listed in Box 74.4 . Bleeding risk can also be assessed using the validated VTE-BLEED score ( Box 74.5 ). Patients with less than 2 points have a 0.5% risk of major bleeding, compared to 2.0% in patients with scores of 2 or more points.

BOX 74.4
Contraindications to Anticoagulation

Absolute contraindications to anticoagulation include:

    • Active bleeding into a critical organ or uncontrolled site

    • Severe bleeding diathesis

    • Recent, planned, or emergency high-bleeding-risk surgery or procedure

    • Recent major trauma

    • Recent intracranial, spinal or ocular hemorrhage

Relative contraindications to anticoagulation include:

    • History of gastrointestinal major bleeding

    • Intracranial or spinal tumors

    • Previous bleeding into a tumor

    • Large abdominal aortic aneurysm with concurrent severe hypertension

    • Stable aortic dissection

    • Recent, planned, or emergent low-bleeding-risk surgery/procedure

BOX 74.5
The VTE-BLEED Score

  • Active cancer, 2 points

  • Male patient with uncontrolled hypertension, 1 point

  • Anemia, 1.5 points

  • History of bleeding, 1.5 points

  • Renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance 30–60 mL/min), 1.5 points

  • Age ≥60 years, 1.5 points

Superficial Vein Thrombophlebitis

Distal superficial vein thrombophlebitis can adequately be treated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and warm compresses. The rate of DVT or PE within three months of superficial thrombophlebitis is about 3%, so patients with superficial vein thrombosis should be scheduled for a repeat ultrasound in 7 days to rule out progression. Based on the results of a large randomized controlled trial, patients with superficial thrombophlebitis involving the greater saphenous vein that extends above the knee are at risk for progression to DVT via the saphenous-femoral vein junction. In these patients, an abbreviated 45-day course of prophylactic-dose anticoagulation reduced clot extension, PE, and DVT, though the absolute rates of PE were less than 1% regardless of treatment allocation. If a greater saphenous vein clot is proximal (within 3 cm of the connection with the femoral vein; see Fig. 74.2 ), the risk of extension to the deep venous system is about 25% so therapeutic (full dose) anticoagulation is warranted for at least 30 days.

Isolated Calf Vein Thrombosis

The optimal management strategy for thromboses isolated to the calf veins remains controversial. About 15% of untreated isolated calf-vein DVT will extend into the popliteal vein or more proximally. Anticoagulation lowers the rate of proximal propagation and embolization. However, it is not known whether the benefit of anticoagulation outweighs the risk, nor is it known whether anticoagulation is superior to a strategy of serial venous ultrasound with anticoagulation reserved for DVT that propagate proximally. Several factors should lead the emergency clinician to favor anticoagulation, including: ongoing thrombotic risk (e.g., active cancer, immobility), severe symptoms, DVT longer than 5 cm, DVT close to proximal veins, or a history of prior VTE. High bleeding risk favors surveillance without anticoagulation. When treatment with anticoagulation is used for isolated calf vein thrombosis, the dosing regimen is the same as for proximal DVT (see Table 74.3 ).

Phlegmasia Cerulean and Alba Dolens

Massive iliofemoral vein occlusion results in swelling of the entire leg, with extensive vascular congestion and associated venous ischemia, producing a painful cyanotic extremity. There may be associated arterial spasm resulting in phlegmasia alba dolens (painful pale leg), which may mimic an acute arterial occlusion. Elevated compartment pressures can also lead to limb ischemia. Phlegmasia is a limb-threatening emergency. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment with catheter-directed thrombolysis, percutaneous thrombectomy, or open surgical thrombectomy may be limb-salvaging. These procedures all require interventional-suite or operating-room capabilities. Therefore, emergency clinicians caring for patients with evidence of phlegmasia in hospitals without these resources immediately available should transfer to a capable center as soon as possible.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here