Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Flat back syndrome is described as loss of lumbar lordosis, which alters the center of gravity, thereby shifting the head anterior to the sacrum causing sagittal imbalance. This is typically seen following multiple lumbar fusions with distraction of the lumbar spine that ultimately lead to loss of lumbar lordosis. It was first described in patients undergoing scoliosis repair with placement of Harrington distraction by Doherty. This resulted in forward inclination of the trunk and inability for upright posture. Patients were unable to stand erect without knee flexion and required cervical extension to maintain horizontal gaze. This ultimately leads to increased energy expenditure when standing upright, leading to back pain. In addition to back pain, patients may also report anterior thigh pain from constant flexion at the hips. While loss of lumbar lordosis can occur from degenerative changes leading to pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis mismatch, another common cause is iatrogenic during fusion operations. Positioning such as kneeling or knee-chest position causes flexion of the hips and leads to loss of lumbar lordosis, while positioning that fully extends the hips accentuates lumbar lordosis. Other causes of loss of lumbar lordosis include posterior interbody fusion and segmental distraction, which can result in focal kyphosis. Return of normal posture requires the return of normal lumbar lordosis to restore the normal sagittal balance.
Chief complaint: back pain
History of present illness: A 65-year-old male with a history of multiple lumbar fusions in the past as well as cervical fusion beginning over 20 years ago, with his last surgery being approximately 10 years ago. He has had both decompressive and fusion surgery. He has not been able to lay down flat on his bed for many years. He has severe back and radicular pain and requires high doses of pain medication. He is unable to stand straight and complains of his back fatiguing. He denies weakness. He underwent imaging and was concerning for flat back syndrome ( Figs. 38.1–38.3 ).
Medications: AndroGel, armodafinil, omeprazole, valsartan, ranitidine
Allergies: nickel
Past medical and surgical history: hypertension, back pain, laminectomy, L1-S1 posterior spinal fusion, spinal cord stimulator placement and removal, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
Family history: noncontributory
Social history: disabled, nonsmoker
Physical examination: awake, alert, and oriented to person, place, and time; cranial nerves II–XII intact; bilateral deltoids/triceps/biceps 5/5; interossei 5/5; iliopsoas/knee flexion/knee extension/dorsi, and plantar flexion 5/5
Reflexes: 2+ in bilateral biceps/triceps/brachioradialis with negative Hoffman; 2+ in bilateral patella/ankle; no clonus or Babinski; sensation intact to light touch
|
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Preoperative | ||||
Additional tests requested | Conservative measures |
|
|
|
Surgical approach selected | L4-5 modified pedicle subtraction osteotomy and T10-ileum posterior fusion | T10-S2 posterior fusion with L4 pedicle subtraction osteotomy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goal of surgery | Restore sagittal balance and LL | Restore sagittal balance and LL, spinal cord decompression at L5-S1 | Decompress stenosis at L5-S1 and L1-2, repair L5-S1 nonunion, correct sagittal balance (40–45 degrees of correction) | Increase LL in order to decrease PI-LL mismatch, improve overall sagittal balance |
Perioperative | ||||
Positioning | Prone, no pins | Prone on Jackson table, no pins |
|
|
Surgical equipment |
|
|
|
|
Medications | None | None | None | Tranexamic acid |
Anatomical considerations | Dura, nerve root | Aorta, iliac arteries, dura sac, nerve roots | Dura, nerve root, PLL | Dura, spinal cord, iliac vessels, ureter |
Complications feared with approach chosen | Dural tear, CSF leak | Excessive blood loss, nerve root injury, pedicle fracture, CSF leak | Dural tear, CSF leak, nerve root injury, cage displacement | Vascular injury, CSF leak |
Intraoperative | ||||
Anesthesia | General | General | General | General |
Exposure | T10-sacrum | T10-sacrum |
|
L1-pelvis |
Levels decompressed | L4-5 | L5-S1 |
|
|
Levels fused | T10-sacrum | T10-sacrum |
|
L1-pelvis |
Surgical narrative | Position prone, midline incision, subperiosteal dissection, expose from T10 to sacrum, extend previous fusion to T10 with pedicle screws and down to ilium with iliac screws, modified pedicle subtraction osteotomy at L4-5 level with posterior wedge closing osteotomy, rod insertion and compression to restore lumbar lordosis, wound closure in layers with drain | Position prone with transverse rolls to increase LL, midline incision from T10-S2, subperiosteal dissection exposing posterior elements including facet joints and transverse processes, remove previous lumbar instrumentation, implant pedicle screws from T10 to S1 and S2 alar iliac screws, pedicle subtraction osteotomy at L4, closure of osteotomy with extension of hip joints and elevation of trunk, gentle compression between the pedicle screw head, position rod with lordotic contouring avoiding excessive stress on pedicle screws, careful attention to SSEP and MEP at this time, L5-S1 laminectomy with bilateral foraminotomy, apply autograft with bony substitutes along bony surfaces, layered closure with subfascial drain |
|
|
Complication avoidance | Good debridement of disc space, gentle compression over pedicles to compress screws, attempt to achieve 360-degree fusion | Position with transverse roll to increase LL, pedicle subtraction osteotomy to increase LL, careful attention to MEP and SSEP during closure of the osteotomy and compression on pedicle screw | Multistage approach, remove scar at nonunion so that area can be properly decorticated, generous facetectomies posteriorly to avoid iatrogenic nerve root injury during anterior correction, imaging between stages, bolster for stage 2 to provide extension, leave posterior annulus at L5-S1 intact, anterior column release if more correction needed, confirm nerve roots decompress before compressing across osteotomies | Three-stage approach, pelvic screws with anatomical landmarks, stimulate screws to confirm location, posterior column osteotomy to increase LL, femoral strut graft, pedicle subtraction osteotomy if needed to increase LL |
Postoperative | ||||
Admission | ICU | ICU | ICU | ICU |
Postoperative complications feared | CSF leak, wound infection, instrument failure | Neurological deficit, hematoma | Epidural hematoma, wound infection, nerve root injury, medical complications, nonunion, loss of fixation | CSF leak, vascular injury, new neurological deficit, hardware failure/spinal instability, nonunion |
Anticipated length of stay | 5–7 days | 3 days | 8–10 days | 4–7 days |
Follow-up testing | T-L spine x-rays 2 weeks, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year after surgery | CT T-L spine within 48 hours of surgery |
|
CT T-L spine within 24 hours of surgery |
Bracing | None | None | TLSO when out of bed for 12 weeks | None |
Follow-up visits | 2 weeks, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year after surgery | 1 week after surgery | 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after surgery | 3 weeks after surgery |
Flat back syndrome
Back pain
Scoliosis
Adjacent segment disease
Proximal junctional kyphosis
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here