Heavy Ion Radiation for Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas


© 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Please note that the copyright for the original figures submitted by the contributors is owned by Contributors.

Introduction

Radiotherapy seeks application of a curative dose to tumor with maximum sparing of healthy normal tissue. Newer photon techniques achieve highly conformal treatment at the cost of increased integral dose to normal tissue with higher risk of secondary malignancy. Particle therapy offers improved conformity of dose distribution with the possibility of further dose escalation and thus higher tumor control probability (TCP). Particle therapy is also able to reduce the integral dose and the dose to specific normal tissues. Consequently, the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) remains nearly constant, whereas the TCP increases. So far, the risk of secondary malignancy seems to be lower. Protons have almost the same biological effectiveness, whereas carbon ions provide a higher biological effectiveness. New accelerator, treatment planning, and beam delivery technology has been widely disseminated and introduced in clinical practice. As of October 2015, 50 centers worldwide treat patients with cancer with protons and eight centers use carbon ions. Thirty-two additional facilities for protons and four facilities for carbon ions are under construction, and 15 proton facilities are planned. Thus far, over 120,000 patients worldwide have been treated with particle therapy. Despite its relatively high costs compared with that of photon therapy, more and more health insurance policies cover particle therapy for selected tumors, such as chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base and spine, with need for doses and proximity to sensitive structures. The biological and physical advantages of carbon ions promise further improvement in tumor control compared with photons and protons. In this chapter, the physical and biological characteristics of carbon ions will be compared with those of protons and photons and the indications, technique, and results of carbon ion treatment in patients with chordomas and chondrosarcomas will be discussed.

Radiobiological and Physical Principles

Proton and carbon ion beams provide dose distributions superior to those of photon beams because of their finite range in tissue. The initial energy and the tissue characteristics determine the depths of penetration of the particle beam. In contrast to photons, whose energy deposition reaches a maximum after a few centimeters of tissue penetration and declines thereafter, the energy deposition of particles slowly increases with the penetration depth. At the end of the particle’s range, this increase is extremely steep, resulting in a very narrow and high peak, the so-called Bragg peak ( Fig. 35.1 ). A steep decline in the energy deposited at the field’s borders reduces the integral dose to normal tissue and accounts for the safety advantages of particle therapy. Carbon ions are fragmented in nuclear interactions with atoms of the irradiated tissue. Some of the low-energy carbon ions deposit their energy beyond the range of C12 particles in the so-called fragmentation tail. This tail has to be included into the planning software calculations to prevent dose hotspots in organs at risk. Carbon ions produce a smaller dose penumbra, defined as dose band lateral to the field edge in which the dose decreases from 80% to 20% of that of maximum, than do protons. This smaller penumbra underlies the higher conformity of carbon ion radiotherapy ( Fig. 35.2 ).

Figure 35.1, Depth–dose curve of photon and carbon ion: the photon curve (red) reaches the dose maximum after a few centimeters of tissue penetration, followed by a decrease in energy deposition. The carbon ion curve (blue) shows a slow increase in energy deposition with penetration depth. At the end of the range the dose increase is extremely steep and results in a very narrow and high peak, the Bragg peak. The spread out Bragg peak curve (green) represents the carbon ions of different energies with Bragg peaks at different depths.

Figure 35.2, Plan comparison for a brain tumor. The plan with carbon ions shows a smaller dose penumbra (above) compared with the plan with protons (below).

Biological Characteristics

Since the rate of energy loss to tissue of charged particles is proportionate to the particle mass, the linear energy transfer (LET) is higher for carbon ions than for protons. The low LET of proton beams, as used clinically, results in a relative biological effectiveness (RBE) similar to that of photons. The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) recommends an RBE of 1.10 for protons in clinical use. Thus the advantage of RBE of protons compared with that of photons is only 10%. In contrast, carbon ions offer an RBE of between 3 and 5, depending on multiple factors. The RBE of carbon ions is low in the entrance channel and reaches its highest value within the Bragg peak at the end of its range. The RBE in high-LET radiation decreases as the dose per fraction increases in both tumor and normal tissue, but rate of decrease in tumor is slightly less than that in healthy tissue. This effect is based on the greater ability of normal cells to repair sublethal radiation-induced damage. Thus hypofractionation permits both increase of dose to the tumor and improved sparing of organs at risk. In conclusion, carbon ions have both physical and biological advantages.

Indications

In the past, chordomas and chondrosarcomas were considered radioresistant. This is only partially true, because a dose–response correlation exists. The rate of 5-year local tumor control in chordoma increases from 25% after a dose less than 60 Gy, to 50% after a dose of 60–70 Gy, and up to 80% after a dose over 70 Gy. A similar dose–response relationship can be found in the treatment of chondrosarcoma, although the required dose seems to be slightly lower. Thus the value of a radiation technique that permits dose escalation without increased toxicity. Carbon ions meet this requirement; with their physical and biological properties, they offer higher TCP without increasing tumor and normal tissue NTCP.

Skull Base Chordoma

Chordomas arise from notochordal remnants and are mostly located alongside the neuraxis. Although relatively rare, metastasis in lung, bone, and liver can occur in very late diagnosed or dedifferentiated chordomas. Metastases are present in 5% of patients at initial diagnosis and in 65% patients with advanced-stage tumors. Nevertheless, because of their locally aggressive growth and high recurrence rates, local control is still the most important prognostic factor for survival. En bloc resection or gross total resection is often difficult to achieve because of local invasive growth that involves adjacent critical neurovascular structures of the skull base ( Fig. 35.3 ). Complete resection results in the best long-term survival, but even after complete resection, there is a high rate of recurrence. R2 resection and high-dose proton/photon therapy result in rates of 5- and 10-year local tumor control of 73% and 54%, respectively, compared with 47% and 42%, respectively, after resection only. Thus a nerve-sparing partial resection or biopsy followed by hig-dose radiation (of at least 70 Gy) with particles result in better local tumor control rates than radical resection alone. Highly conformal techniques such as particle therapy should be used to optimize the ratio of TCP to NTCP.

Figure 35.3, Magnetic resonance imaging (wT2 stir) in axial (left) and sagittal (right) view of a clivus chordoma.

Skull Base Chondrosarcoma

Chondrosarcomas arise from the cartilage; approximately 5%–12% arise at the skull base ( Fig. 35.4 ). Metastatic disease in chondrosarcomas is very rare in grade I/II chondrosarcoma of the skull base, and local tumor control is the most important determinant of outcome. As with clivus chordomas, complete resection of a skull base chondrosarcoma is nearly impossible and risk of recurrence is high. Bloch et al., reviewing 560 patients, found a 5-year recurrence rate of 44% after surgery alone, 19% after radiation alone, and 9% after surgery and radiation. Furthermore, surgery of skull base chondrosarcomas has a high risk of neurological complication rates (33.3%) and of cerebrospinal fluid leakage (10.3%). Thus conservative tumor surgery with minimal morbidity followed by radiotherapy with hadrons is recommended. For local tumor control, high-dose radiation treatment is necessary because of the relatively high radioresistance to irradiation with conventional techniques. Application of total doses up to 80 GyE is possible when using particles.

Figure 35.4, Magnetic resonance imaging (wT1 contrast enhanced) in axial view of a chondrosarcoma of the left skull base ( green arrow ).

Sacrum and Mobile Spine Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas

Since the 1970s, en bloc resection of spine tumors with tumor-free margins and without violation of the tumor capsule has been the treatment of choice. An adequate surgical margin is the most important factor for local tumor control and patient survival but can be achieved for only 50% of sacrococcygeal chordomas. After R1/R2 resection, the local recurrence rate approaches 100% without any additional therapy. Sacrectomy above S2 causes significant morbidity, including urinary and bowel incontinence. In contrast, long-term follow-up in 50 patients with spinal or sacral chordomas and sarcomas found no significant difference in the rates of local control and survival between R0 and R1/R2 resection and postoperative radiotherapy. An issue is whether radical resection with high morbidity is actually necessary or whether biopsy followed by high-dose radiotherapy alone can produce similar tumor control with less morbidity. The Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) in Boston and the National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) in Chiba reported 5-year rates of local progression-free survival of 79.8% and of local control of 88% following high-dose irradiation alone. Long-term tumor control of chordomas and chondrosarcomas at the mobile spine by surgery is even more challenging than for sacral tumors and should also be improved by high-dose radiation treatment.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here