Pathophysiology of the Peripheral Immune Response in Acute Ischemic Stroke


Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant NS081179.

Ischemic stroke triggers an inflammatory response in the affected area, which progresses for days to weeks after the onset of symptoms. The inflammatory reaction involves both tissue resident and peripheral immune cells. Thus the local inflammatory response within the ischemic territory leads to the generation of molecular cues, including cytokines, chemokines and danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMP) setting the stage for the recruitment of peripheral immune cells by weakening the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and by generating chemotactic gradients and activating signals for blood leukocytes. There is evidence that selected aspects of such inflammatory processes contribute to the progression of ischemic brain injury, worsen tissue damage, and exacerbate neurologic deficits. However, research points at a more multifaceted role of immune cells in brain ischemia, where immune cells participate in repair processes during the subacute and chronic stages of brain ischemia. In addition, the interaction of the ischemic brain and the immune system is bidirectional, and although the peripheral immune system is supplying immune cells that participate in the local inflammatory response, neural and humoral signals generated by the ischemic brain modulate the activity of the peripheral immune system leading to immunosuppression and increased risk for nosocomial infections. Understanding these processes and the nature of immune cells involved during deleterious and reparatory phases of postischemic inflammation will be necessary to devise effective therapeutic strategies for human stroke . This chapter will briefly discuss the role of peripheral immune cells participating in the inflammatory response to cerebral ischemia, deliberate potential entry points used by these cells to gain access to the ischemic tissue, and outline the role of the ischemic brain in shaping the peripheral immune response.

Cerebral Ischemia and Inflammation

Infiltration of hematogenous cells into the ischemic territory that persists for days and even weeks after the initial insult is the hallmark of the inflammatory reaction, which parallels activation of brain microglia, astrocytes, and endothelial cells. Cytokines and chemokines are important molecular cues in the inflammatory response to cerebral ischemia. The inflammatory reaction is believed to start at the time of intravascular occlusion due to altered rheology resulting in activation of the endothelium by shear stress and by activation of the coagulation cascade, which leads to the surface expression of adhesion molecules on endothelial cells, the generation of the proinflammatory proteases of the coagulation cascade (thrombin, tissue factor), and release of cytokines and lipid mediators from activated platelets [interleukin (IL)-1 and eicosanoids]. At the same time, cell injury in the ischemic territory generates DAMP including purinergic molecules and high mobility group box 1 protein that signal locally to activate brain resident immune cells but, helped by a deteriorating BBB, might also be released into the blood stream where they are sensed by circulating immune cells or can reach distant lymphoid organs such as spleen and lymph nodes, where they activate local immune cells ( Fig. 28.1 ).

Figure 28.1, Temporal profile of the immune response after focal cerebral ischemia in mice.

Immune Cells Participating in Ischemic Injury and Tissue Repair

Postischemic inflammation is characterized by activation of brain resident leukocytes, microglia, astroglia, and vascular cells, and the orchestrated recruitment of various blood-borne immune cells which will be discussed in the following text.

Neutrophils

Although intravascular adhesion of neutrophils is a relatively early postischemic event, parenchymal accumulation is generally observed later. Nevertheless, neutrophils are among the first hematogenous immune cells found in the brain after experimental stroke. Although it is not clear whether they enter the brain parenchyma under all circumstances, there is evidence that neutrophils contribute to postischemic inflammation by limiting tissue perfusion due to intravascular clogging, destabilizing the BBB by releasing matrix-metalloproteinases, and by generating reactive oxygen (ROS) and nitrogen (RNS) species. However, a cause-and-effect relationship between the extent of neutrophil trafficking and the severity of ischemic damage has not been firmly established. Attesting to the complex role of neutrophils in cerebral ischemia, “protective” neutrophils, which have undergone functional polarization and express protein markers commonly found on alternatively activated (M2) macrophages, can also be found in the ischemic territory .

Microglia, Monocytes/Macrophages, and Dendritic Cells

Historically it has been difficult to separate the relative contribution of resident (microglia) and blood (monocyte)-derived macrophages to ischemic brain injury. Because these cells are not readily distinguishable by morphology or marker gene expression, most results derived from in vivo studies could either implicate microglia or macrophages or both. Advances in multilabel flow cytometry and the availability of bone marrow chimeric animals that express discernable markers (fluorescent proteins or CD45 alloantigen) have allowed to discern microglia and blood-derived myeloid cells. Microglia are activated early after ischemia before extensive neuronal cell death occurs. This early response, characterized by increased exploratory behavior, gives way to macrophage-like transformation within the first 24 h after stroke. Although proinflammatory and cytotoxic activities of microglia have been demonstrated in vitro, eliminating proliferating microglia/macrophages in vivo increased ischemic brain injury and reduced expression of the neurotrophic cytokine insulin-like growth factor 1. In line with their multifaceted role in inflammation, microglia can undergo functional polarization according to the M1/M2 paradigm to acquire a proinflammatory or antiinflammatory/reparatory phenotype, respectively . Similar to microglia, monocyte-derived macrophages can exhibit various phenotypes. Blood monocytes exist as two functionally distinct subpopulations (inflammatory and patrolling) in mice and humans and the relative abundance of these subsets in the blood has been linked to clinical stroke outcome. Initially, infiltrating monocytes are of the “inflammatory” subtype, whereas “patrolling” monocytes are prevalent at later time points. Similar to microglia, monocyte-derived macrophages can undergo functional polarization into M2 macrophages potentially contributing to the resolution of inflammation and tissue repair . However, the precise role and dynamics of monocyte-derived macrophages in postischemic inflammation remains to be defined.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here