Fall circumstances, consequences, assessments, and interventions to manage fall risk among individuals living with spinal cord injury


List of abbreviations

10-MWT

10-Meter walking test

6-MWT

6-Minute Walking Test

ADL

activities of daily living

BBS

Berg balance scale

CHIEF

Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors

FIST

function in sitting test

FOF

fear of falling

FES I

The Falls Efficacy Scale International

mFRT

modified functional reach test

PEI

photo-elicitation interviews

SCI

spinal cord injury

SCI-FCS

Spinal Cord Injury-Fall Concerns Scale

SCIM III

Spinal Cord Independence Measure III

TAI

transfer assessment instrument

TUG

timed up and go

WISCI II

Walking Index for SCI

WST

Wheelchair Skills Test

Introduction

Falls are a common scenario, among other impairments and conditions, experienced by individuals living with a spinal cord injury (SCI) (see Table 1 ). Between 31% and 82% of individuals living with SCI will experience at least one fall in a year ( ). This chapter examines the frequency of falls, circumstances associated with falls, consequences of falls, methods to evaluate fall risk, and intervention programs to manage fall risk.

Table 1
Common impairments, conditions, and scenarios associated with spinal cord injury.
Spinal shock
Paralytic ileus
Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus
Autonomic dysreflexia
Falls
Pressure ulcers
Spasticity
Postural hypotension
Bladder, bowel, and sexual function
Osteoporosis
A summary is provided of impairments, conditions, and scenarios commonly associated with spinal cord injury.

Fall frequency

Falls are common among people living with SCI who are nonambulatory (use a wheelchair or scooter full time) and those who ambulate. A fall is defined as an event in which an individual unexpectedly makes contact with the ground, floor, or some other lower level ( ). Due to differences in functional abilities, it is important to consider differences in fall frequency between those who ambulate and those who do not.

A systematic review and meta-analysis performed by found that 34% to 82% of individuals living with SCI who are able to ambulate fell at least once over a 6- to 12-month period, and 31% to 73% of individuals living with SCI who are nonambulatory fell at least once in the same time span ( ) (see Table 2 ).

Table 2
Frequency of falls among ambulatory and nonambulatory individuals living with spinal cord injury ( ).
(Data source: Khan, A., Pujol, C., Laylor, M., Unic, N., Pakosh, M., Dawe, J., et al. (2019). Falls after spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence proportion and contributing factors. Spinal Cord , 57 (7), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-019-0274-4 ).
Frequency % of Ambulatory individuals with SCI % of Nonambulatory individuals with SCI
At least 1 fall 34%–82% 31%–73%
Recurrent falls (more than 1 fall) 28%–68% 30%–41%
The frequency of falls among individuals living with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) who ambulate and nonambulatory individuals are presented along with data on the frequency of the population, both ambulatory and nonambulatory, that sustain recurrent falls.

Ambulatory individuals are more likely to fall compared to individuals who do not ambulate ( ). The odds of falling for individuals who ambulate are more than 29 times higher compared to individuals who do not ambulate. Jorgensen et al. proposed that falls are less frequent among nonambulatory individuals due to the larger base of support provided by the wheelchair.

Recurrent falls

Among nonambulatory individuals with SCI, Jorgensen et al. reported that men experienced recurrent falls (more than one fall) 3.1 times more often than women within a year. This finding could be explained by the difference in how men and women manage risk. As age increases, the odds of falling more than once among nonambulatory individuals with SCI decreased. The increased odds of falling among younger adults may be due to activity level and involvement in activities in the workplace that increase exposure to more potential fall situations than older adults ( ).

Between 30% and 41% of nonambulatory individuals had recurrent falls within a 6- to 12-month period ( ). Recurrent falls were also reported 14% more often among individuals with greater functional mobility independence, likely because more mobile individuals can engage in more intense physical activity and are therefore more likely to fall ( ).

Most ambulatory individuals with SCI report falling more than once ( ). Within a 6- to 12-month period, 28%–68% of ambulatory individuals with SCI experienced multiple falls ( ). Jorgensen et al. reported that individuals who could recover by themselves following a fall experienced 4.7 times more recurrent falls than those who could not get up by themselves. The increased frequency could be related to increased confidence in the ability to recover from a fall among those who are able to recover independently. Increased confidence may result in taking greater risks and exposure to more situations that lead to a fall ( ).

Fall circumstances

The circumstances in which individuals living with SCI are likely to encounter a fall vary widely. Compared with other populations, including older adults, much less is known about fall risk factors among individuals living with SCI ( ). Further research is needed to comprehensively understand risk factors associated with falls.

To systematically examine the known risk factors associated with falls, the Biological, Behavioral, Social & Economic, and Environmental (BBSE) Model is used to classify fall risk factors and highlight the multi-factorial nature of falls ( ). Fig. 1 displays a visual representation of the BBSE.

Fig. 1, Biological, Behavioral, Social and Economic, and Environmental Fall Model. The figure provides a visual representation of the biological, behavioral, social and economic, and environmental fall model. The model provides a framework for the classification of circumstances associated with falls. Please note how the various components intersect. This represents the multi-factorial nature of falls and the need to consider various factors when designing programs to manage fall risk.

Biological risk factors

Biological contributors of falls among both ambulatory and nonambulatory individuals living with SCI include many factors. The most common contributors include muscle weakness, loss of balance, spasticity, and muscle spasms ( ; ; ; ). Lower levels of functional mobility have also been linked to an increased risk of falling ( ). However, Nelson et al. found that persons with more function are also at greater risk because they have a greater exposure to situations where falls may occur, making them more likely to engage in risk-taking behaviors ( ). Other biological factors that may increase the risk of falls summarized by Khan et al. include: male sex (wheelchair users only), an increased number of comorbidities, trunk weakness, fatigue, walking asymmetry, shorter duration since sustaining SCI, narcolepsy, and reduced sensation ( ). Age can also be a risk factor. Among 94 participants, individuals who reported a high frequency of falls were significantly younger. This may be because these individuals are more active and have greater levels of enthusiasm and energy ( ). In addition, reports of pain in the 2 months prior to the fall can affect the performance of activities of daily living and increase fall risk ( ). Studies have also revealed that individuals living with incomplete spinal cord injury, injuries in which partial sensation and/or motor function persists below the level of injury, experience significantly more falls than individuals with complete injuries ( ).

Behavioral risk factors

In a systematic review and meta-analysis, Khan et al. found that the most commonly reported behavioral attributions associated with falls included inattention or distraction, ambulation, fear of falling, a history of previous falls, and not using the safety features of a wheelchair or walking aid ( ). Risk-taking behaviors are also associated with falls ( ), which is theorized to be the reason why men are three times more likely to fall than women ( ). Nelson et al. also found alcohol abuse increased the risk of falls as well as the use of a shorter wheelchair. A shorter wheelchair allows for greater maneuverability; however, the design makes the chair less stable overall ( ). Finally, individuals with a lower quality of life were found to fall more frequently ( ).

Environmental risk factors

Environmental contributors to falls exist both within and outside the home. Hazards such as railings, stairs, heavy doors, and slippery floors are identified as increasing the risk of falls ( ). Among nonambulatory individuals, Sung et al. reported that the bathroom was the most common location for falls to occur, and 43% of falls were associated with pushing or driving the wheelchair on rough surfaces ( ). Forslund et al. found that 65% of falls occurred indoors, and 47% of falls occurred between the hours of 9 AM and 6 PM ( ).

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here