Radiological Evaluation of the Craniofacial Skeleton


Background

It was the discovery of X-rays by Wilhelm Roentgen in 1895 that allowed visualization of the internal structures of the body for the first time in history. In 1972, an electrical engineer, Godfrey Hounsfield, advanced the use of X-rays with the invention of computed tomography, allowing the complete visualization of the internal solid organs, soft tissues, and bones of the body using image reconstruction mathematics. A new imaging modality, magnetic resonance imaging, shortly followed in 1973. This modality using a magnetic field and mathematical analysis of the signals for image reconstruction, allowed unprecedented evaluation of the internal architecture of the soft tissues, such as the globe of the eye and individual muscle groups. Now all of these modalities are used in the emergent, surgical, and clinical setting to evaluate both the osseous and soft tissue components of the craniofacial region in its entirety.

Surgical Anatomy

The surgical anatomy is shown in Figs. 1.2.1–1.2.10 :

Radiological Evaluation

Radiography

Radiographs of the skull at various angles allow visualization of the major osseous structures of the face and mandible. Plain radiographs are named based on the projection of the X-ray beam. The most common radiographs of the face in the trauma setting include: standard occipitomental (30 degrees OM or Waters view), posteroanterior (PA skull or Towne view), reverse Towne's and the true lateral skull ( Fig. 1.2.1 ). The submentovertex view, which requires hyperextension of the neck, is not obtained given the risk of a concomitant cervical spine injury seen in 2.2% of patients with maxillofacial fractures. Each projection of the face best demonstrates certain osseous features of the craniofacial skeleton ( Table 1.2.1 ). However, overlapping osseous structures limit evaluation of the entire craniofacial skeleton, especially the midface, sinuses, and skull base. Moreover, the patient must be able to cooperate with positioning to obtain the various projections. This is impossible with patients suffering from traumatic brain injuries associated with craniofacial fractures.

Fig. 1.2.1, Plain radiographs of the face: (A) PA view, (B) true lateral view, (C) occipitomental view, and (D) reverse Towne's view.

TABLE 1.2.1
Craniofacial Radiographs
Waters (30 degrees OM) Towne's (AP Skull) Reverse Towne's True Lateral Skull
Cranium
Midface fractures
Le Fort I
Le Fort II
Le Fort III
Paranasal sinuses
Frontal sinus
Sphenoid sinus
Maxillary sinus
Mandible
Mandibular condyle
Coronoid process

Panoramic Radiography

The panoramic radiograph (orthopantomogram or panorex) displays the entire maxillomandibular region on a single image ( Fig. 1.2.2A ). The term panoramic radiography is derived from panorama, “an unobstructed view of a region in every direction.” There are two different ways of obtaining panoramic views, which are defined by the location of the radiation source: intraoral or extraoral.

Fig. 1.2.2, (A) Normal panoramic radiograph of the mandible. (B) Panoramic radiograph of the mandible demonstrates bilateral mandible fractures. There is a nondisplaced fracture through the anterior body of the right mandible ( black arrowhead ) and a displaced, comminuted fracture through the angle of the left mandible ( white arrowhead ) extending to the root of a partially erupted molar tooth.

The intraoral technique requires a small X-ray tube be placed in the patient's mouth where radiation is directed through the jaws to expose a film placed just outside of the targeted facial anatomy. The first patient undergoing this procedure was reported by a German inventor, Horst Berger. The extraoral technique, which is the most popular method in use today, employs an extraoral source of radiation that rotates around the patient. To create a panoramic view, objects in front or behind the focal trough are blurred, leaving a sharp image of the entire mandible in one 2-dimensional plane facilitating the diagnosis of mandible fractures and dentoalveolar trauma ( Fig. 1.2.2B ).

Panoramic radiographs are fast and convenient with minimal training needed for the operating technician. Moreover, panoramic radiography provides the lowest radiation dose with broad coverage of maxillomandibular bones and teeth. This imaging modality is most advantageous for stable patients who cannot tolerate intraoral procedures or examination. The limitations of the radiographs include unequal magnification across the image, making linear measurements unreliable, as well as difficulty imaging both sides of the mandible when the patient has severe maxillomandibular discrepancies causing malocclusion. The tomographic technique of the exam also creates artifacts, including double images of the hyoid bone, cervical spine, and epiglottis. Ghost artifacts, which are higher than the true anatomic location on the opposite side of the image, are created by the upward inclination of the X-ray beam. These artifacts, in addition to the superimposition of overlying structures, limit the complete evaluation of the maxillomandibular structures, especially the mandibular condyle and coronoid process which overlap the mastoid prominence and midface, respectively.

Computed Tomography (CT)

In computed tomography, an X-ray tube rotates around the patient emitting a fan-shaped beam of X-rays that are detected by a row of detectors on the opposite side. Initially, the X-ray tube and detector rotated synchronously around the patient for one cycle then the table would move a small increment (i.e., 5 mm) for the next scan or slice image. This was known as the “step and shoot” method or so-called incremental scanners. In 1989, CT scanners acquired image data in a helical fashion where the X-ray tube and detectors continuously revolve around the patient while the table advances the patient through the gantry. This overlapping image data results in higher spatial resolution, improved multiplanar reconstructions, faster scanning and reduction in radiation dose. Multidetector CT scanners were introduced in 1998 beginning with a 4-detector row CT scanner and progressing to the current state-of-the art CT scanners with up to 320-detector rows allowing for multiple slices to be captured quickly and simultaneously, reducing exposure time and motion artifact. This also results in improved resolution and quality of the axial, reformatted, and 3-dimensional images of the face. Current technology allows data obtained via CT to be transmitted to the operating room for computer-assisted surgery, including presurgical planning and intraoperative navigation during the repair of craniomaxillofacial injuries.

In comparison to plain radiographs of the face, CT eliminates the superimposition of structures and provides high-resolution contrast of the osseous structures and soft tissues that can be viewed simultaneously in three orthogonal planes as well as 3D ( Figs. 1.2.3–1.2.7 ). This allows for complete evaluation of the face, skull base, cranium, and brain. In a large study, it was reported that the most common fractures were to the midface (71.5%) with supraorbital and frontobasal skull fractures present in 4.2% of the cases. CT is superior to plain radiographs when assessing the mandible, especially nondisplaced symphyseal fractures, given the overlapping spine on the AP Towne's view. CT has a higher accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity (90%, 90%, 87%, respectively) for condylar fractures when compared to panoramic radiographs (73%, 70%, 77%, respectively). CT has also been shown to detect additional fractures not seen on plain or panoramic radiographs, often leading to a change in operative management. In the setting of penetrating trauma, multidetector CT is the best imaging modality to assess the trajectory of the missile and injury to the adjacent soft tissues and vascular structures ( Fig. 1.2.8 ).

Fig. 1.2.3, Anatomy of the craniofacial skeleton in the axial plane through the: (A) mandible, (B) pterygoid plates, (C) skull base, and (D) orbits.

Fig. 1.2.4, Anatomy of the craniofacial skeleton in the coronal plane through the: (A) anterior, (B) middle, and (C) posterior nasal cavity.

Fig. 1.2.5, In contrast to the 2-dimensional axial CT images, 3-dimensional volume-rendered CT images demonstrate the entire craniofacial skeleton in one image. (A) Frontal view of the face. (B) Lateral view of the face.

Fig. 1.2.6, Volume-rendered CT images of the face demonstrating the main skeletal bones creating the face and orbits. (A) Frontal view of the face. (B) Oblique view of the face.

Fig. 1.2.7, Volume-rendered CT images of the mandible illustrating normal anatomy. (A) Frontal view of the mandible. (B) Oblique view of the mandible.

Fig. 1.2.8, CT images of a 25-year-old male after a suicide attempt. (A) Volume-rendered CT image of the craniofacial skeleton demonstrates a circular defect in the frontal bone superior to the left orbit ( white arrow ). (B) Shaded volume-rendered CT image of the craniofacial skeleton reveals the tip of a crossbow arrow extending through the midface ( white arrowheads ) in addition to the circular skull fracture created by another arrow ( white arrow ). (C) Coronal CT image of the midface shows the obliquely oriented crossbow arrow extending through the right maxillary sinus, inferior nasal cavity, and hard palate with tip in the left masticator space.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here