Body contouring


Synopsis

  • The skin/fat envelope is tethered to the underlying musculoskeletal anatomy in zones of adherence. These include the spine, the sternum, the linea alba of the abdomen, the inguinal area, the suprapubic area, and the area between the hip and lateral thigh fat.

  • Massive weight loss (MWL) patients make up the majority of patients who undergo lower bodylift/belt lipectomy surgery. Second are females with a body mass index (BMI) in the range of 26–28. Third are normal-weight females who wish a more dramatic improvement than an abdominoplasty alone.

  • Three factors affect patient presentation: the BMI, the fat deposition pattern, and the quality of the skin/fat envelope.

  • Bodylift/belt lipectomy procedures can be thought of as a circumferential wedge excision of the lower trunk. One end of the spectrum of procedures is the lower bodylift type II (Lockwood technique), and the other end is the belt lipectomy/central bodylift (Aly and Cram technique).

  • Patients presenting for this surgery require a complete medical assessment and a thorough physical examination.

  • In planning a bodylift/belt lipectomy, scar position can be approximated by simulating the tissue dynamics at the time of closure. Anteriorly, the inferior marks control the scar position, and posteriorly, the superior marks control the scar position.

  • The operative sequence usually involves anterior surgery first, followed by posterior surgery and closure.

  • Postoperative care requires hospital-level nursing with attention to patient positioning, early ambulation, fluid infusion, and pain control.

  • While major complications are possible, the commonest problem is seroma.

Brief introduction

  • Circumferential approaches to body contouring are a cornerstone for reshaping of the trunk after pregnancy, weight loss, or aging.

  • Procedures for trunk contour reshaping differ in design and execution, and body contouring surgeons should understand the fundamental principles of each procedure and be able to apply these in an individualized approach to meet each patient's unique anatomical features and aesthetic goals.

    • In broad strokes, the belt lipectomy is a powerful tool for refining the waistline, while the lower bodylift generally has a more inferior zone of resection and effectively enhances lateral thigh and buttock shape.

  • Innovations in tissue repositioning during circumferential bodylifting have enabled significant advances in buttock shaping with local flaps.

  • Body contour deformities of the lower trunk can range from “anterior only” to “circumferential” deformities.

    • If problems are restricted to isolated moderate lipodystrophy deposits, then liposuction may be the only treatment modality needed.

    • Anteriorly, if skin laxity and/or abdominal wall weakness are encountered, then abdominoplasty techniques are needed to create the best contour.

    • If the deformities involve skin and subcutaneous laxity circumferentially, then bodylift/belt lipectomy procedures are usually required to adequately address the issues.

  • Although it is true that tension is bad for scarring and blood supply, tension is essential for improving body contour in excisional procedures.

    • In abdominoplasty, the elliptical excision creates the greatest amount of tension in the central zone of the abdomen. Thus, the areas above and below this region, superiorly the epigastric region and inferiorly the mons pubis, demonstrate the greatest amount of improvement.

    • As the elliptical excision is followed laterally, the amount of tension decreases, reaching zero at its lateral edges ( Fig. 7.1 ) . Thus, the improvements above and below the excision, the anterior thighs, and the lateral abdomen also decrease in magnitude as the elliptical excision is traversed from medial to lateral.

      Figure 7.1, The black arrows indicate the amount of tension that will be created at closure after the proposed resection of the abdominoplasty ellipse. The greatest amount of tension is central and trails off to zero at the lateral edge of the elliptical closure. The extent of body contour improvement above and below the resection is directly related to the amount of tension. Thus, the extent of improvement, light blue, above and below the final scar will also be greatest centrally and fizzle to zero, laterally. This patient does not need improvement laterally, above and below the proposed excision, thus is an ideal candidate for an abdominoplasty.

    • In an ordinary low BMI patient with “anterior only” deformities, there is little need for improvement above and below the excision, outside of the anterior abdomen.

    • However, in most massive-weight patients, many 20–30 pounds overweight patients, and some normal-weight patients, there is a need for significant improvements above and below the level of excision circumferentially around the entire lower trunk ( Fig. 7.2 ) . Thus, with the tension maintained circumferentially, the improvement is also maintained circumferentially above and below the excision.

      Figure 7.2, In a patient with circumferential deformities above and below the proposed area of excision, there is a need to maintain excisional tension circumferentially to attain the appropriate improvements in all the involved areas.

    • If the concept of maintaining tension around the trunk is ignored in patients who need improvements circumferentially, either by doing an abdominoplasty or a T-type (fleur-de-lis) resection, the results are less than ideal, with the lateral and posterior aspects of the lower trunk remaining unchanged after surgery ( Fig. 7.3 ) .

      Figure 7.3, Note in this massive weight loss patient, the improvements attained by a traditional abdominoplasty are limited to the central anterior abdomen, shown below. Because there is no tension created by the abdominoplasty laterally and posteriorly, shown by the loss of light blue color, above, there is no improvement in these areas.

Preoperative considerations

  • There are three groups that can potentially benefit from bodylift/belt lipectomy procedures: massive weight loss (MWL) patients, the 20–30 pounds overweight group, and the normal-weight patients group.

  • MWL patients:

    • Make up the majority of patients who undergo bodylift/belt lipectomy.

    • The lower trunk of MWL patients can be thought of as a balloon. As patients gain weight and then lose it, the balloon is initially stretched by the weight gain, then deflated as weight loss ensues. The intrinsic elasticity of the skin is often irreversibly altered, leading to redundant lax skin, which is almost always circumferential in nature. The usual pattern is of an inverted cone ( Fig. 7.4 ) .

      Figure 7.4, The figure demonstrates the typical shape of the lower trunk after massive weight loss; a three-dimensional “inverted cone”.

  • The 20–30 pound overweight group (BMI range of 26–28):

    • Women who have never lost any significant weight despite reasonable exercise and nutritional habits.

    • Often present with lipodystrophy of the lower trunk that is circumferential in nature, which leads to generalized lack of definition of the lower trunk ( Fig. 7.5 ) .

      Figure 7.5, This patient is typical of the “20–30 pound overweight” group. Note the generalized circumferential lipodystrophy of the lower trunk.

  • Normal-weight patients group:

    • Ordinarily would be considered candidates for an abdominoplasty but desire more dramatic improvements in lower truncal contour.

    • These patients often desire a remarkable improvement in their anterior thighs, lateral thighs, buttocks, and lower back.

    • In many similar patients, liposuction can improve all of these areas when combined with an abdominoplasty; however, if patients desire significant lifting and contour delineation, then a circumferential excisional procedure is required ( Fig. 7.6 ) .

      Figure 7.6, This patient presented in her mid-30s with a desire to improve her abdominal contour but also desired the best possible contour of her entire lower trunk, which included better waist definition, lifting of her anterior and lateral thighs, as well as a buttocks lift.

    • A subgroup of normal-weight patients who can benefit from a bodylift/belt lipectomy is the older patient whose skin will not contract with liposuction due to skin laxity and will require the pull created by the circumferential excision ( Fig. 7.7 ) .

      Figure 7.7, A patient in her 60s is shown before and after a belt lipectomy. Patients in this age group often do not attain enough skin retraction through liposuction and may require an excisional procedure to attain the best possible contour.

  • Three factors seem to affect the presentation of patients seeking truncal contouring procedures: the BMI at presentation, the fat deposition pattern, and the quality of the skin/fat envelope.

    • MWL patients will present to the plastic surgeons at different BMI levels ( Fig. 7.8 ) .

      Figure 7.8, Six massive weight loss patients are shown at presentation after weight stabilization. Note the significant amount of variability in BMI, fat deposition pattern, and quality of the skin/fat envelope.

    • The type of deformity that an MWL patient presents with also depends on their particular fat deposition pattern. Humans are born with a genetically controlled pattern of fat deposition, as well as a fat loss pattern. Females generally tend to store fat in the extraperitoneal space, the lower abdomen, hips, and thighs – a pattern often referred to as “pear shaped” ( Fig. 7.9 ) . Males tend to store fat more centrally in what is often referred to as an “apple-shaped” configuration, where fat is deposited intraperitoneally and in the flanks (or “love handles”), and less fat is deposited in the thighs (see Fig. 7.9 ).

      Figure 7.9, Two patients demonstrating the two most common fat deposition patterns. On the left, the “apple” shape is shown, most often encountered in males, although demonstrated in a female here. On the right, the typical “pear-shaped” female pattern of fat deposition is shown.

    • The skin/fat envelope is important in determining what must be done to meet patient goals. Some patients present with very pliable and thin skin/fat envelopes, while others will present with very thick, non-pliable tissues.

  • A concept that is helpful in examining these patients is the “translation of pull” ( Fig. 7.10 ) .

    • The lateral abdominal tissues are pinched, simulating the effects of the lateral abdominal resection of a bodylift/belt lipectomy on the distal thigh, which can be predictive of the final result with a certain degree of accuracy.

    • If the pinch demonstrates very little translation of pull to these areas, as in the case of patients who present with high BMIs and thick, non-pliable skin/fat envelopes, this can be used to predict the final result.

    • As a general rule, the greater the BMI drop, the more translation of pull will be present.

    Figure 7.10, The “translation of pull” is demonstrated in this figure. The patient in the middle picture is demonstrating the potential distant effects of the proposed resection, simulated by the pinching hands. Note the postoperative anterior thigh contour is fairly similar to the preoperative pinch.

Common presentation of the massive weight loss patient

  • Almost all present with a “hanging panniculus” ( Fig. 7.11 ) .

    Figure 7.11, Six massive weight loss patients demonstrating the variety in shape and size of their presenting panniculi.

  • Almost every patient will present with a “ptotic mons pubis”.

  • The waist, which is the narrowest aspect of the lower trunk between the ribs and the pelvic rim, can be blunted in many MWL patients by the hanging skin/soft tissue envelope, as it drapes from the ribs to below the pelvic rim.

  • The anterior and lateral thighs are usually ptotic.

  • The buttocks are usually ptotic due to the effects of the weight gain/loss process. This can present with a lack of demarcation between the lower back and buttocks ( Fig. 7.12 ) .

    Figure 7.12, The variety in shape and size of the buttocks is demonstrated in these six massive weight loss patients. The accompanying lipodystrophy of the hip region, as well as the descent of the buttocks, often contribute to a lack of buttocks definition and demarcation from the lower back.

  • Many patients present with back rolls. Some are located in the lower back and may be improved with bodylift/belt lipectomy. Some present superiorly, usually contiguous with breast rolls, and are not affected by bodylift/belt lipectomy and must be addressed through upper bodylift procedures ( Fig. 7.13 ) .

    Figure 7.13, Six different massive weight loss patients demonstrating the variety of back roll presentations. The mid- to lower back rolls are often reduced or eliminated after bodylift/belt lipectomy, but the upper back rolls are not.

Patient selection criteria

  • Significant cardiopulmonary disease is a contraindication for bodylift/belt lipectomy procedures.

  • Smoking is considered a contraindication by most surgeons.

  • Patients with collagen vascular disease should also be approached with extreme caution.

  • The BMI at presentation should be a very important factor in determining whether a plastic surgeon should operate.

    • Complications increase with increasing BMIs, and as a result, many plastic surgeons do not operate on patients who present with a BMI >32.

    • If choosing to operate on higher BMI patients, these patients must accept a much higher complication rate, especially if the BMI is > 35, where the complication rate is around 100%.

  • Ideally, it is best to delay body contouring procedures until patients have stabilized their weight loss for a minimum of 3 months.

    • For lap-band patients, the average time to weight stability is around 2 years.

    • For gastric bypass and gastric sleeve procedures, the average is around 18 months.

    • For duodenal switch procedures, the average is 12–14 months.

  • If a patient presents with too much intra-abdominal content to allow flattening of abdominal contour by muscle wall plication, then the result of a circumferential procedure is very similar to that attainable by panniculectomy, and thus, it would thus be prudent to avoid the increased risk of the circumferential excision and limit the procedure to a panniculectomy only.

  • The recovery period after a circumferential dermatolipectomy can be quite challenging, both physically and psychologically. Choosing a patient with unstable psychological problems to go through the prolonged and arduous recovery can result in disastrous consequences.

  • Criteria for patient selection are given in Box. 7.1 .

    Box 7.1
    Patient selection

    • Medical stability

    • Psychiatric stability

    • Non-smoker (most surgeons but not all)

    • Low intra-abdominal content

    • Weight stability

Preoperative evaluation

  • A detailed weight history is essential in patients who present for lower truncal contouring. It is important to ascertain the etiology of their lower trunk abnormalities, which include aging, child birth, skin laxity due to sun exposure, and MWL. If the main cause is weight loss, then the following questions should be answered:

    • What was their greatest weight?

    • How did they lose weight?

    • What was their lowest weight?

    • How long have they been at their present weight?

    • Do they think they are going to lose more weight?

    • Are they prone to “heroic methods” of weight loss?

  • A careful history of all significant medical problems, including nutritional habits, nutritional supplementation requirements, and nutritional deficits, should be obtained.

  • Some surgeons my require psychiatric clearance for each belt lipectomy/bodylift patient to emphasize the extensive nature of the surgery to the patient as well as alerting the mental healthcare provider that their services may be required in the postoperative period.

  • The following points should be carefully noted on physical examination:

    • The degree of skin laxity.

    • The amount of subcutaneous fat.

    • The translation of pull, as described above.

    • The presence of scars (e.g., subcostal cholecystectomy scars may jeopardize the flap vascularity, and vertical midline scars may limit abdominal flap inferior mobility).

    • Waist definition.

    • The presence of abdominal or back rolls.

    • The degree of rectus diastasis and/or the presence of hernias.

    • The amount of intra-abdominal content must be noted. This can be assessed with the patient lying supine and relaxed. If the abdominal contour is scaphoid and the abdominal wall falls below the rib cage, then it would be expected that rectus fascia plication will be effective in flattening the contour. If the abdominal tissues are above the level of the ribs, then it can be presumed that intra-abdominal contents are large enough to prevent effective plication (see Fig. 7.9 ).

    • The degree of buttocks projection and ptosis.

    • The degree of anterior and lateral thigh lipodystrophy and ptosis.

    • An extensive set of labs should be obtained as early as possible in the care of the patient because it may take some time to correct abnormalities. These labs should include a complete blood count, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, electrolytes, glucose, urinalysis, liver function tests, iron, calcium, albumin, pre-albumin, total protein, vitamin B, magnesium, and thiamine.

    • Chest X-ray and electrocardiogram are obtained if indicated.

Anatomical pearls

  • When contemplating circumferential dermatolipectomy of the lower trunk, a thorough understanding of abdominal wall blood supply is critical.

  • Subcutaneous abdominal fat is divided into superficial and deep layers by the superficial fascial system (Scarpa fascia).

    • In thin patients, the two layers are fairly close to each other in thickness. In patients who have a high BMI, the superficial layer is often much thicker than the deep layer.

  • Zones of adherence: areas within the trunk where the skin/fat envelope is tethered to the underlying musculoskeletal anatomy, restricting either descent or elevation, which can occur with aging, weight fluctuation, or surgical manipulation.

    • Act like “hooks” for the skin/fat envelope to hang on to as it falls down, especially after the skin has been stretched by excess weight and then deflated by weight loss ( Fig. 7.14 ) .

      Figure 7.14, The zones of adherence of the trunk. Note the inferomedial descent of tissues that occurs with aging and/or weight loss.

    • Strong zones of adherence include zones overlying the spine, sternum, and bilateral inguinal region.

    • Weak/variable zones of adherence include zones over the midline linea alba of the abdomen and in the horizontal suprapubic crease.

    • Other important zones of adherence: between the hip and lateral thigh.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here