What Is the Approach to the Patient Seeking a Hastened Death?


Introduction and Scope of the Problem

The very nature of the terms “physician-assisted suicide,” “physician aid in dying,” and “medical aid in dying” may evoke strong feelings from opponents as well as advocates who would wish to focus this evidence review on questions of morality or steps to promote its use. This review will not address the legal and ethical issues involved in responding to a request for hastening death, but rather will focus on the evidence of how to address the request itself. Regardless of personal beliefs, clinicians caring for patients with serious illness may at some point in their career receive some form of a request to hasten death, and how one responds to such a request can have a significant impact on alleviating a patient’s suffering.

Terminology

Hastened death occurs when people wish to act on their desire to control the circumstances of their death with or without assistance from another individual. Thus hastened death can refer to multiple scenarios.

Physician aid in dying refers to a physician providing at the patient’s request a lethal prescription which the patient self-administers to end their life. The term medical aid in dying is preferred by many as it is inclusive of the nonphysician clinicians who prescribe the lethal medicines. The practice is perhaps better known by the public as physician-assisted suicide . Some advocates prefer not to use the term “suicide” as they contend that aid in dying is a medical practice and is distinct from the act of suicide by a depressed patient, while others argue that suicide is the more descriptive term. Further complicating matters, the term “medical assistance in dying,” under Canada’s 2016 law (formerly Bill C-14), is used to refer to the act of both aid in dying and voluntary euthanasia. The term “aid in dying” has been criticized by some as it may be misconstrued to include hospice or palliative care, which provide interventions to ease the dying process without hastening death.

Euthanasia refers to the administration of a lethal agent by another person (usually a physician) to a patient for the purpose of causing death and is illegal in the United States.

Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment refers to halting active interventions that may prolong a patient’s life. The American Medical Association’s (AMA) position is that the principle of patient autonomy requires that physicians must respect the decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment of a patient who possesses decision-making capacity and that the decision to withdraw treatment is ethically the same as the decision to withhold treatment. The AMA defines “life-sustaining treatment” as any medical treatment that serves to prolong life without reversing the underlying medical condition, such as mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, chemotherapy, antibiotics, and artificial nutrition and hydration.

Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking is the deliberate choice of an individual with advanced illness to stop ingesting food and water with the intent of hastening death.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here