What Are Special Considerations for Dosing Medications in Pediatric Populations?


Introduction and Scope of the Problem

Dosing palliative care medications for pediatric populations is an evolving methodology that continues to change and adapt with improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic knowledge. It is well understood that children and adolescents should not be treated as “little adults” and informed adjustments are needed for medications. While evidence remains insufficient for complete medication management in pediatric populations, improved dosing recommendations have arisen and continue to evolve. Dosing for supportive care medications, including pain and symptom-targeting medications, often varies significantly among the stages of development to reduce risks of toxicities or suboptimal efficacy. The most profound developmental changes are seen within the first two years of life, when many pharmacokinetic evolutions occur.

Relevant Pathophysiology

Pharmacokinetics in Pediatrics

Pharmacokinetics involves the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of medications. These parameters are affected by aging and in turn impact medication efficacy and toxicity. Absorption is not thought to contribute heavily to altered pharmacokinetics among older pediatric patients, but the changes should be considered, especially in dosing under the age of two years. Oral formulations are the most commonly utilized medications in infants and neonates, rendering immature absorption an important consideration for dosing. Neonates are born with an elevated gastric pH that slowly decreases over time but does not reach the adult-equivalent pH until age two years, especially impacting the absorption of weak acid drugs such as phenytoin. Also contributing to reduced absorption in neonates, gastric motility and emptying is believed to be slowed and intragastric metabolic activity and biliary function are both reduced. These pharmacokinetic changes demonstrate the need to adjust oral dosing appropriately in neonates, but over the age of two years, absorption generally becomes equivalent to that of adults. Similarly, the volume of distribution of drugs changes over time in pediatrics, reflective of physiological changes in body composition (decreases in total body water composition and extracellular spaces over time) and changes in plasma protein binding patterns with age.

An appreciation of pharmacokinetics is particularly relevant for pediatric palliative care as the decreased fluid intake, inflammation, and catabolic state which may occur as children approach the end of life can impact medication clearance and volume of distribution. Changes in the pharmacokinetics of medications used commonly in pediatric symptom management (opioids, anxiolytics, antiemetics, etc.) can cause increased or decreased serum concentrations, which can translate into increased risk of adverse drug reactions or altered efficacy.

Metabolizing Enzymes and Childhood

Metabolizing enzymes can be separated into three classes that are differentially affected in pediatric development. Class 1 enzymes, such as cytochrome P3A7 (CYP3A7), have their highest expression in the first trimester but have negligible levels by two years of age. Class 2 enzymes, such as CYP2C19, possess a relatively constant expression throughout development. Lastly, class 3 metabolizing enzymes, such as CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, and many UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes have minimal expression at birth, but they begin to increase in activity over the weeks following birth and reach sustained pediatric levels by two years of age. These changes in metabolizing enzyme expression impact drugs that undergo extensive hepatic metabolism, such as with sildenafil, whose clearance increases threefold over an infant’s first ten days of life due to increasing CYP3A4 metabolism.

This changing and developing drug metabolism in children translates into a safety issue for pain management selection. The FDA has placed black box warnings against the use of codeine and tramadol for pediatric patients due to reports of fatal overdoses from variable metabolizing enzyme activity in children. Specifically for these two medications, further variation is introduced, as pharmacogenomic aberrations in the CYP2D6 alleles also alter their metabolism, impacting the analgesic and toxic effects of what would have historically been considered normal doses for age/size.

Severe proinflammatory states or cachectic malnutrition can further impact metabolic capacity for pediatric palliative care patients. As the liver is a child’s main conversion center for processing medications into metabolites, attentiveness to hepatic clearance is an important consideration in the care of children receiving palliative care. The bioavailability of certain medications may be altered due to changes in liver blood flow (shunting congenital cardiac conditions, heart failure) or hepatic function (metabolic disorders resulting in cirrhosis). Transdermal or subcutaneous infusion may be considered for children with adequate subcutaneous tissue as this route may bypass the portal vein and therefore avoid reliance on first-pass metabolism.

Renal Considerations in Pediatric Dosing

Elimination is stunted in early development and does not reach adult levels of renal function until around one year of age. This can result in decreased renal clearance in neonates and infants, but upon kidney function development, increased relative kidney mass results in increased clearance in children as compared to adults. Thus dosing of medications, especially those which are primarily renally excreted, should take this into consideration. These clearance differences are vital to understand for accurate dosing, and thus pediatric populations utilize a specialized formula, the Schwartz equation, for estimating pediatric glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

Terminally ill children often have reduced elimination of drugs and metabolites due to diminished fluid intake (resulting in prerenal failure), which may be masked in serum creatinine lab values due to diminished muscle mass in deconditioned pediatric patients at the end of life. Rather than chase lab values, in some cases it may be more practical and more consistent with goals of care (avoiding needlesticks) for pediatric palliative clinicians to be aware of the risk of accumulation of certain drugs and metabolites (such as morphine-6-glucuronide as a major metabolite of morphine) and attentive to the possible clinical signs of such. For example, in monitoring general fluid intake as compared to urinary output and monitoring for adverse effects in children with diminished renal function (confusion, nausea, and myoclonic movements), palliative care providers may then consider clinical adjustments (e.g., rotation to a synthetic opioid such as fentanyl).

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here