Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Evidence Levels: A Double-blind study B Clinical trial ≥ 20 subjects C Clinical trial < 20 subjects D Series ≥ 5 subjects E Anecdotal case reports
Wells syndrome (eosinophilic cellulitis) is a rare inflammatory disorder resembling a bacterial cellulitis. Patients are often treated with antibiotics and fail to respond before the diagnosis of Wells syndrome is considered and then confirmed on skin biopsy. The pathogenesis remains obscure, but it is postulated that Wells syndrome represents a hypersensitivity reaction to a variety of stimuli, both endogenous and exogenous. Excessive production of interleukin-5 resulting in eosinophil accumulation and a local Th2 immune response have been documented. There are several recognized disease associations, including drug-induced disease. The condition can be recurrent, and although thought to be sporadic, familial patterns have been reported. The most common clinical manifestations are erythematous patches and plaques, but papulonodular and bullous types of Wells syndrome have been described. Characteristic histologic features include dermal edema with a marked eosinophilic infiltrate and flame figures (representing deposition of eosinophilic proteins and degradation products onto collagen fibers), although this is not specific to the condition. The usual course is of a pruritic sensation, followed rapidly by indurated, erythematous plaques of edema with violaceous edges that can form blisters. The lesions progress over a few days, resolving without scarring within 8 weeks. There is no anatomic predilection for plaques, and they may be solitary or multiple.
Although there is no known cause, several precipitating factors have been suggested ( Table 255.1 ). Some of the associations are well reported, others anecdotal. Injection site skin lesions have been associated with the tumor necrosis factor antagonists etanercept and adalimumab, the anti-IL-12/23 monoclonal antibody ustekinumab, with interferon-β. Interestingly, adalimumab has also been successfully used to treat refractory Wells syndrome in two cases. Minocycline can also induce a Wells syndrome–like disorder.
Allergic asthma exacerbation Allergic contact dermatitis (paraphenylenediamine [PPD] and black rubber in temporary henna tattoo) Angioimmunoblastic lymphadenopathy Chronic spontaneous urticaria Churg–Strauss syndrome Coeliac disease Drugs (including vaccines, both those containing thimerosal and aluminum salts) Hypereosinophilic syndrome IgG4-related disease Infections: bacterial, viral (HIV, herpes simplex, parvovirus, varicella, molluscum contagiosum, coxsackie), parasitic ( Ascaris, toxocariasis, giardiasis), fungal ( Trichophyton ) Insect bite reactions Leukemia Lymphoma Metallic alloy implants Radiotherapy Solid cancers (lung, colon, gastric, renal) Systemic lupus erythematosus Ulcerative colitis |
Suspect culprit drugs should be withdrawn. If an underlying systemic disease is identified, this will require treatment. Many cases of Wells syndrome associated with internal malignancy resolved with treatment of the initial tumor.
All treatment recommendations are limited to case reports and small case series. The most frequently reported therapy is with systemic (oral) corticosteroids, used at moderate doses to gain control of symptoms, followed by tapering. Cases may resolve spontaneously. Localized disease may respond to superpotent topical steroids. Topical tacrolimus has been used successfully. The H 1 antihistamine cetirizine , with antieosinophil action, has been effective; levocetirizine and hydroxyzine in combination have also proven successful. Minocycline , dapsone , antimalarials , griseofulvin , adalimumab , and ciclosporin are anecdotally beneficial. Omalizumab has proven effective in treatment resistant disease, and mepolizumab treatment in an asthmatic patient cleared concomitant Wells syndrome.
Moossavi M, Mehregan DR. Int J Dermatol 2003; 42: 62–7.
Winfield H, Lain E, Horn T, et al. Arch Dermatol 2006; 142: 218–20.
Boura P, Sarantopoulos A, Lefaki I, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 839–40.
Yin G, Xie Q. Rheumatol Int 2012; 32: 1087–9.
Fujimoto N, Wakabayashi M, Kato T, et al. Clin Exp Dermatol 2011; 36: 46–8.
Nakazato S, Fujita Y, Hamade Y, et al. Acta Derm Venereol 2013; 93: 375–6.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here