Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Solid tumors require a vascular system to grow beyond about 2 mm in diameter, a size at which diffusion of oxygen and nutrients is limiting. The establishment of a tumor vasculature through the process of angiogenesis overcomes these limitations, while also providing a conduit through which cancer cells can metastasize. The close association between tumor growth and increased vascularity was described in the 19th century by several researchers, including the pathologist Rudolf Virchow, who also first proposed a link between chronic inflammation and cancer. An important experimental advance in angiogenic research came in the 1920s, when transparent chambers were first used to observe the growth of vessels into tumors in animals in real time. In a seminal study published in 1950, Algire and colleagues used transparent chambers to follow vessel recruitment to a variety of normal and malignant tissues transplanted into mice. Their studies provided some of the first observations that transplanted tumor tissue, in contrast to normal tissue, induced the development of an extensive vascular bed; moreover, this angiogenic response preceded rapid tumor growth. The authors succinctly stated the now-axiomatic idea that “the rapid growth of tumor explants is dependent on the development of a rich vascular supply.” Judah Folkman’s proposal in 1971 that tumor growth might be inhibited, or even reversed, by blocking tumor angiogenesis sparked a remarkable flurry of activity in basic and clinical research. A milestone in angiogenic cancer therapy was passed in 2003, when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the anti-angiogenic monoclonal antibody Avastin (bevacizumab) as a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.
This chapter provides a general overview of tumor angiogenesis, highlighting specific molecular pathways that regulate this process, and discusses the ongoing development and clinical evaluation of anti-angiogenic therapies. It is organized into sections that describe (1) the development of vascular structures in normal and malignant tissues, (2) the signaling pathways that regulate their formation, and (3) the therapeutic strategies that underlie ongoing drug development, as well as the current results of clinical trials using anti-angiogenic therapies. Finally, we discuss some of the remaining questions and challenges that are likely to drive angiogenic research in the coming years.
Development of the vascular system is one of the first events in embryonic organogenesis. Mesoderm-derived vascular endothelial cells (ECs) generate lumen-containing tubular structures that form the basic functional unit of blood vessels. Initially, vascular networks form independently in the yolk sac and the embryo, and then connect to generate a closed circulatory system. In a process known as vasculogenesis , endothelial cell progenitors ( angioblasts ) and their derivative ECs aggregate de novo in the yolk sac to form a primitive vascular network or plexus of approximately uniform dimensions ( Figure 17-1 ). Subsequent angiogenesis occurs through vessel sprouting , in which ECs from existing vessels respond to angiogenic signals by degrading their basement membrane, loosening their association with support cells, altering their morphology, and proliferating. These ECs migrate in response to chemotactic signals and coalesce to form new vessels that connect to the existing vasculature. The coordinated recruitment of supporting mural cells, including pericytes and smooth muscle cells , results in vessel maturation. In a parallel mechanism termed intussusception , columns of endothelial cells create a barrier in the lumen of a preexisting vessel, thus partitioning it into multiple independent vessels ( Figure 17-2 ). This complex series of events produces a closed, highly arborized system of larger and smaller vessels including arteries, veins, and capillaries.
In contrast to the yolk sac, angioblasts in the embryo migrate along specific pathways and aggregate directly to form the dorsal aorta and posterior cardinal vein, without passing through an intermediate plexus phase. These vessels undergo subsequent remodeling and ultimately connect to the extra-embryonic yolk sac vessels to form a mature vascular system. Interestingly, vascular development is also intimately associated with the development of hematopoietic cell lineages, as hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) have been shown to arise from the hemogenic endothelium , which comprises Runx-1 expressing ECs restricted to the ventral portion of the developing dorsal aorta (see Figure 17-1 ).
The vessels of the parallel lymphatic system collect and return interstitial fluids, particulates, and extravasated cells to the venous circulation. Lymphatic vessels differ from blood vessels in that lymphatic capillaries have internal membranous valves that prevent fluid backflow, and they are generally not surrounded by support cells. Lymphatic ECs are derived from primitive veins and express and respond to a different spectrum of receptors and signaling molecules than ECs in blood vessels (Ref. , and see later discussion). The ability of cancer cells to invade lymphatics and collect in lymph nodes, complex organs involved in local immune surveillance, is an important indicator of tumor metastasis. It is likely that the lymphatic vessels at the periphery of a solid tumor are most directly involved in metastasis, as interstitial pressure within the tumor often leads to vessel collapse. Recent evidence supports the idea that lymphatic ECs may secrete chemokines that attract tumor cells and may therefore participate more actively in metastasis than was previously recognized.
In adult humans and mice, there is little regular angiogenic activity, with the notable exception of the female reproductive system. Localized angiogenesis is, however, an important aspect of normal wound healing, and inflammatory cells including macrophages, neutrophils, and mast cells, as well as activated resident fibroblasts, are an important source of angiogenic modulators during wound repair. Recently, it was shown that macrophages directly bind angiogenic ECs and promote the formation of anastomoses between them. On remodeling and fusion with the surrounding vasculature, these new vessels restore normal blood supply to the wounded area. These infiltrating stromal cells also represent an important component of many solid tumors, where they can produce angiogenic factors as part of what may be considered an aberrant wound healing response, leading to the idea that tumors represent “wounds that never heal.” Genetic experiments using multiple murine cancer models have established that tumor-associated macrophages play a critical role in driving tumor angiogenesis and metastasis.
Rapid growth of any tissue (embryos, neoplasias, adipose tissue, regenerating liver, etc.) invariably requires a supply of oxygen, nutrients, and hormones and is typically accompanied by active angiogenesis. Consequently, angiogenesis can be seen as a genetically programmed, dynamic process that can be activated locally in response to stimulatory signals. The fact that most blood vessels in the adult body are quiescent has been proposed as an advantage of anti-angiogenic strategies, which typically target actively dividing ECs, as these drugs may be less generally toxic to quiescent ECs lining established vessels.
The blood vessels found in solid tumors are notable for being highly disorganized compared to those of normal organs and are characterized by tortuous and misshapen vessels that sometimes terminate in open-ended blood lakes ( Figure 17-3 ). These aberrant vessels are thought to result from dysregulated angiogenic signaling in the tumor bed, as a result of oncogene activation and tumor suppressor loss. Microscopic analysis of tumor vessels reveals disrupted junctions between tumor ECs and reduced or inconsistent coverage by pericytes, which helps explain the increased permeability characteristic of tumor vessels. The origin of some tumor ECs is also controversial: In addition to ECs recruited through sprouting of preexisting vessels, growing evidence supports a role of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) that either differentiate into endothelial-like cells or promote expansion of bona fide ECs (see Figure 17-2 ). The precise cellular origins and complexity of these cells remain controversial, and the degree to which murine EPCs actually contribute directly to the lining of new tumor vessels varies considerably, depending on the model used, genetic background, and other factors. In addition, bone marrow–derived myeloid cells contribute to tumor angiogenesis; these cells have been reported to express a variety of cell surface markers, including those common to endothelial cells (Tie-2) and myeloid cells (CD11b, Gr-1), and may function by providing paracrine angiogenic signals. It is interesting to note that genetic ablation of bone marrow–derived Tie-2 expressing monocytes (TEMs), in particular, has profound effects on tumor angiogenesis in mice (see Refs. , and references therein).
Tumors often display sluggish, uneven, and highly variable patterns of blood flow, as well as direct arteriole-venule shunts. Tumor vessels also differ from normal vasculature in being exposed to an acidic microenvironment characterized by oxygen and nutrient deprivation. In rapidly growing tumors, aberrant angiogenic regulation and high interstitial pressure can produce regions of localized anoxia and/or ischemia. This typically results in pockets of necrosis surrounded by a penumbra of hypoxic but living cells. Severely hypoxic conditions are thought to protect tumor cells from radiation therapy, which depends on the generation of reactive oxygen intermediates to kill tumor cells. Moreover, hypoxic regions in tumors appear to select for highly malignant cancer cells. In particular, hypoxia directly promotes angiogenic signaling in tumors, as discussed in more detail later.
The degree to which tumors generate vascular beds is often expressed as microvessel, or mean vessel , density (MVD) , which can vary widely within a given tumor and between tumors of similar or different tissues. MVD is traditionally determined by staining tumor sections with antibodies raised against proteins expressed on ECs, including CD31 (PECAM), CD34, and von Willebrand factor. Clinical studies have demonstrated that MVD is a useful prognostic indicator for a wide array of cancers, including breast, prostate, non–small-cell lung, gastrointestinal, and even hematological tumors. It is important to note, however, that not all tumor vessels are functional and that MVD may greatly exceed the basic metabolic requirements of a growing tumor. The striking functional heterogeneity of vessels within a tumor, and the ability of many cancer cells to withstand severe hypoxia, glucose deprivation, and tissue acidity, makes it difficult to assess the effects of angiogenesis-based therapies based solely on MVD.
Over the past 15 years, work from many laboratories has demonstrated that vascular development in normal tissues is under elaborate genetic and molecular control. Many of the signaling molecules that regulate normal developmental angiogenesis have also been shown to drive angiogenesis in cancer and other pathophysiological conditions, although their expression and function in tumors are often highly uncoordinated. A growing list of molecules has been shown to regulate different aspects of developmental and pathological angiogenesis. Primary among these is the family of vascular endothelial growth factors ( VEGF s) that, along with their receptors, regulate endothelial cell proliferation, survival, and function. The vascular-specific angiopoietins and their receptor tyrosine kinases also play important roles in angiogenic remodeling. In addition, vascular development is regulated by signaling pathways familiar from other developmental processes, including fibroblast growth factors (in particular, basic or bFGF ), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) , Notch and its ligand Delta-like ligand 4 (Dll4) , and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) . In addition, a number of molecules originally implicated in controlling axon guidance, including the semaphorins , netrins , and Robo/slit , have been shown to contribute to vascular development. Finally, the Notch pathway, along with the EphB4/ephrinB2 signaling system, has been shown to control specification of arteries and veins (see Refs. , and references therein). Our understanding of the mechanisms by which these genes and pathways regulate angiogenesis is based largely on genetic “knockout” experiments in mice, often confirmed by in vitro cell-based assays or in experimental tumors. How this complex array of signaling pathways is coordinated to regulate angiogenic events in normal organogenesis and disease is a focus of intensive research. The discovery of endogenous angiogenic inhibitors, including thrombospondin-1 , endostatin , tumstatin, and others, provided strong support for the idea that angiogenesis regulated by the balance between pro- and anti-angiogenic factors. In this section, we discuss the molecular biology and function of a small subset of pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors that show particular promise as targets for cancer therapies.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here