Toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens–Johnson syndrome


Evidence Levels: A Double-blind study B Clinical trial ≥ 20 subjects C Clinical trial < 20 subjects D Series ≥ 5 subjects E Anecdotal case reports

Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) belong to the same spectrum (‘epidermal necrolysis’) of rare, potentially life-threatening conditions caused by drugs in 85% of cases (other causes may be due to autoimmunity or infections such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae ). SJS and TEN manifest with widespread erythematous or purpuric macules, or atypical target lesions, evolving to vesicle and blisters, associated with severe erosions of mucous membranes. Confluence of cutaneous lesions leads to epidermal loss, which by definition involves less than 10% of total body surface area in SJS, 10%–29% in overlap cases, and 30% or more in TEN. Main complications are infections and respiratory failure (resulting mainly from specific bronchial involvement). Overall mortality rate is around 15% (but up to 40% in the most severe cases) and may be predicted by the SCORTEN (SCORe of Toxic Epidermal Necrosis) scale, based on seven clinical and biological parameters at admission. Whatever is the cause of SJS/TEN, standard of care delivered by centers of reference is key for decreasing mortality and risk of chronic sequelae. This chapter only deals with management at the acute phase .

The epithelial changes are caused by extensive apoptosis, a process initiated by drug-induced cytotoxic T lymphocytes (in most cases). A number of proapoptotic molecules, including cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and apoptotic mediators such as granzyme B, perforin, and granulysin, link immune responses to keratinocyte damage.

Management Strategy

The causative drug should be quickly identified and discontinued. In general, drugs introduced 4–28 days before the onset of symptoms must be considered as suspects. The most common drugs causing SJS/TEN are antibacterial sulfonamides (including cotrimoxazole, sulfasalazine, and dapsone), allopurinol, antiepileptics of the aromatic amines family (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, and phenytoin), lamotrigine, non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) of the oxicam family, and nevirapine.

Extensive epidermal loss in SJS/TEN is accompanied by numerous systemic involvements, many of which may be life-threatening such as respiratory failure. Therefore, the patient should be managed in a center of reference, i.e., a specialist dermatology department, intensive care or burn unit, for critical care management and specialist nursing delivery. Supportive therapy is critical, including fluid replacement, maintaining a warm environment, nutritional support, analgesia, organ support (when necessary), surveillance for infection, and appropriate dressings. Fluid replacement requirements depend on the extent of involvement of the skin and may be 5–7 L in the first 24 hours. The ambient temperature should be raised to 28–32°C. Nutritional support may require nasogastric tube feeding (except in case of severe esophageal involvement) until the oral mucosa has healed. Analgesia with opiates is often necessary. Infection surveillance includes taking skin swabs or skin cultures from lesional skin throughout the acute phase and sending these for bacteriology. Administration of prophylactic antibiotics is not recommended, as it may favor skin colonization (particularly with Candida albicans ) and promote resistance. All lines should be checked daily for signs of infection and changed at least every 3 days, and the tips of all discarded lines and catheters sent for culture. If signs of sepsis develop, including rising or falling temperature, rigors, hypotension, fall in urine output, or deterioration of respiratory status, diabetic control, or level of consciousness, initial antibiotic therapy can be guided by the results of skin samples, then adapted to results of blood and/or urine cultures. Blisters should be decompressed by piercing and expression of tissue fluid. Blister roofs and detached epidermis must be left in situ to act as a biologic dressing.

Ophthalmologic review should be obtained as soon as possible from admission to minimize the risk of long-term severe ocular sequelae resulting from conjunctival scarring and corneal ulcerations. Regular instillation of an ocular lubricant without preservatives, and/or topical vitamin A, is recommended. The efficacy of topical steroids is controversial. Topical antibiotics are not recommended. Separation of conjunctival adhesions must be carried out daily by an ophthalmologist or ophthalmically trained nurse.

Oral and nasal debris should be removed regularly. Analgesic and antiseptic mouthwashes must be used frequently.

Tracheal and bronchial involvement is a marker of disease severity and thus must be closely investigated. Respiratory failure can occur, requiring mechanical ventilation.

The cornerstone of the management of SJS/TEN is supportive care in the center used to treat the disease. Macrolides are indicated in cases triggered by Mycoplasma pneumoniae . To date, the efficacy of immunomodulatory agents at the acute phase of the disease remains debatable. Systemic steroids and ciclosporin are the most controversial.

Systemic corticosteroids : several reports suggest that they may increase morbidity and mortality, usually by increasing the risk of sepsis. Conversely, a number of case reports and case studies advocate the use of high-dose corticosteroids at the early stage. Recently, a large epidemiological Japanese study did not show any benefit of systemic steroids on the in-hospital mortality (see below). However, in cases of lupus or dermatomyositis-related TEN, corticosteroids may be used as part of the auto-immune trigger/component accordingly.

Ciclosporin: a French prospective trial and several retrospective case series showed benefits in terms of mortality at the acute phase. However, these results were not confirmed in a large monocenter French study using propensity scores (see later).

Several other potential disease-modifying treatments, especially intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and anti-TNF agents ( especially etanercept ), have been reported in small numbers of patients, but there is currently no strong evidence base for recommending any specific intervention other than supportive care.

Survivors of SJS/TEN should lifelong avoid exposure to the culprit drug and related compounds.

Specific Investigations

  • Histology and direct immunofluorescence of a skin biopsy

  • Hematologic, biochemical, and infectious monitoring

  • Chest X-ray

  • Autoimmunity and infectious (especially Mycoplasma pneumoniae ) investigations if no trigger drug

Established SJS/TEN can usually be diagnosed clinically. Biopsy for histology and direct immunofluorescence of an affected area of skin can exclude conditions such as staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome, linear immunoglobulin A (IgA) bullous dermatosis, and paraneoplastic pemphigus.

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions to drugs

Duong TA, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Wolkenstein P, Chosidow O. Lancet 2017; 390: 1996–2011.

This seminar is a complete overview of epidemiology, pathophysiology, triggers, clinical features, and management of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), including SJS/TEN.

Epidermal necrolysis and autoimmune diseases: two more observations supporting the concept that ‘toxic’ epidermal necrolysis can be ‘non-toxic’

Dumas M, Hua C, Hotz C, et al. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2018; 32: e360–1.

The authors report two cases, one patient with TEN-like subacute lupus, and one with anti-MDA5 TEN-like dermatomyositis, supporting the fact that TEN may be ‘non-toxic’ (not drug-induced). As other diseases such as graft versus host disease, SJS/TEN belong to the spectrum of ASAP (acute syndrome of pan-epidermolysis).

Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: assessment of medication risks with emphasis on recently marketed drugs. The EuroSCAR study

Mockenhaupt M, Viboud C, Dunant A, et al. J Invest Dermatol 2008; 128: 35–44.

The results of a multinational case-control study of risk for developing SJS and TEN from various drugs, showing a strong association for nevirapine and lamotrigine; a weaker association for sertraline, pantoprazole, and tramadol; and confirming a strong association for previously recognized culprit drugs: sulfonamide antibiotics, allopurinol, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and oxicam NSAIDs.

SCORTEN: a severity-of-illness score for toxic epidermal necrolysis

Bastuji-Garin S, Fouchard N, Bertocchi M, et al. J Invest Dermatol 2000; 115: 149 53.

Assessment of seven clinical parameters within the first 24 hours of admission (age over 40 years; history of malignancy; tachycardia >120 beats/min; skin loss >10%; urea >10 mmol/L; glucose >14 mmol/L; bicarbonate <20 mmol/L) can be used to predict risk of mortality at the acute phase (score 0 or 1: 3% risk of death; 2: 12%; 3: 35%; 4: 58%; 5+: 90%).

Comprehensive survival analysis of a cohort of patients with Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Sekula P, Dunant A, Mockenhaupt M, et al. for the RegiSCAR Study Group. J Invest Dermatol 2013; 133: 1197 204.

All-cause mortality rates at 6 weeks in this cohort of 460 patients (recruited between 2003 and 2007) were 12%, 29%, and 46% for SJS, SJS/TEN overlap, and TEN, respectively.

Incidence, causative factors and mortality rates of Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) in northern Italy: data from the REACT registry

Diphoorn J, Cazzaniga S, Gamba C, et al. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2016; 25: 196–203.

This epidemiological study was conducted in Lombardy (Italy) from 2009 to 2014. Seventeen cases of TEN and 59 cases of SJS were collected, meaning an incidence of 1.40 cases (95% CI, 1.12–1.76)/10 6 /year. The mortality rate ranged from 16.9% for SJS to 29.4% for TEN. Five patients (6.6%) had no causative drug. Allopurinol, cotrimoxazole, and lamotrigine were the most frequent trigger drugs, as expected.

Incidence of and mortality from epidermal necrolysis (Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis) in France during 2003–16: a four-source capture-recapture estimate

Chaby G, Maldini C, Haddad C, et al. Br J Dermatol. 2020; 182: 618–24.

In this French epidemiological study (2003–2016) using a four-source capture–recapture method, the annual incidence was found higher than expected: 6.5 (95% CI 4.1–8.9). Incidence increased with age from 4.1 before 20 years old to 13.7 after 65 years old. Mortality from epidermal necrolysis was estimated to be 0.9 (0.1–1.8) cases/10 6 .

First-Line Therapies

  • Supportive measures

  • D

  • Withdrawal of culprit drug

  • D

  • Transfer to a specialist unit

  • D

UK guidelines for the management of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis in adults 2016

Creamer D, Walsh SA, Dziewulski P, et al. Br J Dermatol 2016; 174: 1194 227.

British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for the management of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis in children and young people 2018

McPherson T, Exton LS, Biswas S, et al. Br J Dermatol 2019; 181: 37–54.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here