Topical Analgesics


In contrast to the use of a systemic analgesic, the use of a topical analgesic may result in pain relief without the requirement for notable systemic absorption.

In certain situations, and with specific agents (i.e. nitroglycerine, fentanyl, clonidine), transdermal application results in systemic uptake. In these cases, absorption through the skin while achieving a certain therapeutic blood concentration is responsible for the effects of the drug.

In contrast, a topical analgesic requires neither systemic absorption nor a significant systemic concentration to be clinically effective. Its effect occurs when applied locally and directly to the painful areas, with the primary site of action being local to the application site.

Topical analgesics are used for acute pain, as well as for various types of chronic neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain. Different topical analgesics are associated with different mechanisms of action. Using functional neuroimaging, some changes related to topical analgesics can also be seen in the central nervous system (CNS), in addition to effects occurring locally, at the site of application and within the peripheral nervous system (PNS).

Background

A topical analgesic may interrupt specific mechanisms of pain transmission and, by doing so, lead to a reduction in central pain mechanisms and, consequently, perception of pain. As such, skin application of a topical analgesic may reduce activation of the PNS, thus minimizing pain signal transmission and central processing by the CNS. This chapter reviews the use of topical analgesics to treat various painful conditions and provides an update of previously published similar reviews.

As topical analgesics are locally applied, without significant systemic absorption, the risk for and severity of significant adverse effects and drug-drug interactions are often less than those for the same analgesic administered systemically. As such, using topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) versus oral formulations in knee osteoarthritis (OA) may prove effective in limiting the side effects. Rash and unpleasant skin sensations may occur with the use of a topical analgesic, but neither is typically experienced. Among the topical analgesics currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (see Table 57.1 ) is the 5% lidocaine patch (Lidoderm). Several studies have confirmed the safety and tolerability of topical lidocaine. When using 12 h/day, 5% lidocaine patches demonstrated no significant systemic side effects with plasma lidocaine levels significantly below those known to be associated with cardiac abnormalities. No significant dermal reaction was observed in patients treated long-term with 24 h lidocaine patches.

TABLE 57.1
Food and Drug Administration Approved Topical Medications
Drug Painful Condition
Lidocaine Postherpetic neuralgia, intercostal neuralgia, painful diabetic neuropathy
Lidocaine/prilocaine Postherpetic neuralgia
Diclofenac Soft tissue injuries, osteoarthritis, musculoskeletal pain
Doxepin Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy, atopic dermatitis, lichen simplex chronicus
Capsaicin Painful diabetic neuropathy, human immunodeficiency virus neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, postmastectomy pain

While dermal sensitivity is a potential side effect of all topical analgesics, specific topical analgesics such as capsaicin can be associated with other local adverse effects. After its application, topical capsaicin is commonly associated with severe localized burning. Skin application of capsaicin, at currently available low-dose formulations, does not result in significant systemic accumulation or any life-threatening outcomes; the incidence of burning may decrease with repeated use. However, the occurrence of this side effect may negatively affect treatment adherence and, consequently, the patient’s ability to benefit from its use. In contrast to the over-the-counter capsaicin formulations that need to be applied multiple times, the 8% capsaicin patch (Qutenza) can be applied once for 1 h for analgesic effects lasting up to 12 weeks. Qutenza was generally well tolerated in clinical trials even though burning occurred, and the FDA approved it for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) and painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in July 2020.

In patients suffering from chronic pain in addition to other afflictions and comorbid conditions, such as hyperlipidemia, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and diabetes, a trial of topical analgesics may be beneficial in limiting drug-drug interactions, especially if patients have been administered significant amounts of systemic medications for their underlying conditions. , Since the topical analgesics available typically do not involve dose titration and many systemic agents do, this may provide an additional potential benefit for a patient.

Commercially available FDA approved topical analgesics must have demonstrated to the FDA consistent manufacturing standards and quality control, in contrast to those manufactured and sold by a specialized compounding pharmacy. Topical analgesics made by a compounding pharmacy may consist of a combination of substances, such as a local anesthetic, NSAIDs, and anti-depressants combined in a chemical base that is not commercially available and FDA approved topical products. There is no current general requirement for compounding pharmacies to demonstrate manufacturing consistency. However, those compounds are commonly prescribed as almost 1/3 of pain physicians members of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine have reported that they prescribe topical analgesics. Topical preparations containing opioids, local anesthetics, anti-depressants, glutamate receptor antagonists, α-adrenergic receptor agonists, adenosine, cannabinoids, cholinergic receptor agonists, gabapentinoids, prostanoids, bradykinin, adenosine triphosphate, biogenic amines, and nerve growth factor are each at various stages of clinical development.

The mechanism of action of a specific topical analgesic depends on the chemical entity or entities in the specific agent. In the case of the topical agent capsaicin, the mechanism appears to be through agonist activity at the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) on Aδ and C-fibers. , Substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide are released as a result of this activity. Subsequent depletion of substance P in the C-fibers induces reduced peripheral and central excitability, resulting in less pain through reduced afferent input in response to capsaicin application. , , The results of both human nerve biopsy and animal studies demonstrate nerve fiber degeneration in the skin underneath the site of capsaicin application. Such nerve fiber degeneration associated with the application of capsaicin has been suggested to be one of the mechanisms through which its use results in pain relief.

The mechanism of action of a topical NSAID is probably associated with the inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis and the resulting anti-inflammatory effect. However, the extent of the anti-inflammatory effect is not consistently proportional to the pain relief experienced; therefore other mechanisms of action might be considered.

It may be worthwhile to consider the potential benefits of mixed agents with potentially more and synergistic mechanisms of action. For example, the antinociceptive effects of topical morphine may be enhanced by a topical cannabinoid, as demonstrated in studies in rats.

Local anesthetic agents are known to suppress the activity of peripheral sodium channels within sensory afferents and subsequent pain transmission. It has been noted that decreased expression of mRNA for specific sodium channel subtypes may occur following local anesthetic use. , Several local anesthetic topical analgesics are currently available commercially, including the 5% lidocaine patch, EMLA cream (eutectic mixture of local anesthetics, 2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine), and the Synera patch (lidocaine, 70 mg/tetracaine, 70 mg). Of these three agents, only the 5% lidocaine patch is associated with an analgesic effect without creating anesthetic skin, whereas the use of EMLA cream or the FDA approved Synera patch may create both analgesia and anesthesia. This difference among the preparations is useful for application in specific clinical settings, such as venipuncture, lumbar puncture, intramuscular injections, and circumcision, for which creating both anesthesia and analgesia would be helpful.

A novel area of topical analgesic development involves the use of tricyclic anti-depressants as topical analgesics. Certain tricyclic anti-depressants such as amitriptyline and doxepin have been demonstrated to block sodium channels, and the potential clinical benefit of this mechanism when such an agent is topically applied seems to be especially effective in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. , One commercially available topical anti-depressant, doxepin hydrochloride (Zonalon) cream, is currently approved by the FDA for the short-term treatment of adult patients with pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis or lichen simplex chronicus.

Use of Topical Analgesics for Specific Clinical Conditions (see

Box 57.1 )

• Box 57.1
Pain Conditions Treated With Topical Analgesics

  • Neuropathic pain (various syndromes)

  • Musculoskeletal pain (acute and chronic)

  • Soft tissue pain (acute and chronic)

  • Other pain (dressing changes, cancer treatment related)

Neuropathic Pain

The use of specific topical analgesics for the management of neuropathic pain has been established by several clinical trials that highlight their efficacy.

Local Anesthetics

The first medication to receive FDA approval for the treatment of PHN was a 5% lidocaine patch. Initial studies showed that, when compared with patients treated with placebo, patients treated with 5% lidocaine patches experienced statistically significantly more pain reduction in a safe and well tolerated manner. , Multiple studies have been conducted regarding the clinical efficacy of the 5% lidocaine patch. In an open-label study comparing 5% lidocaine patch with pregabalin (Lyrica) for PHN, the topical local anesthetic was as effective as pregabalin for pain relief in PHN patients. Additionally, the study showed that for patients who did not respond to either the 5% lidocaine patch or pregabalin alone, using these agents in combination resulted in greater benefit and was well tolerated by these patients.

A review that analyzed results from randomized, controlled, and open-labeled studies suggested that the use of 5% lidocaine medicated plaster is effective in the treatment of localized neuropathic pain (LNP), both as part of multimodal analgesic regimen and as a single agent. In a European randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, 5% lidocaine patch was reported to be effective in mononeuropathies such as intercostal and ilioinguinal neuralgias. The results of this study demonstrated that adding the 5% lidocaine patch to other pharmacotherapeutic regimens could reduce ongoing pain and allodynia within the first 8 h following application over seven days. Use of 5% lidocaine has been included in the international treatment guidelines for treating LNP either as monotherapy or in a multimodal analgesic regimen. Several noncontrolled studies using a 5% lidocaine patch for painful diabetic neuropathy showed pain reduction and good tolerability of this medication. Similarly, an open-label study using the 5% lidocaine patch in patients with painful idiopathic sensory polyneuropathy noted significant improvements in both pain and quality-of-life measures.

Topical patches with lidocaine 5% applied to the skin of 150 patients suffering from PHN (up to three patches, 12 h each day) showed reduced pain qualities as described by the neuropathic pain scale in a multicenter, randomized, vehicle-controlled study. Of interest was that certain types of neuropathic pain (deep, sharp, and burning) that were reduced had previously been assumed to not be related to PNS but to CNS mechanisms. In the discussion of their results, the authors proposed that given the localized primary PNS mechanism of action of the 5% lidocaine patch, peripheral mechanisms of neuropathic pain might also be important in the development of these neuropathic pain qualities. The results of a functional brain magnetic resonance imaging study of patients with PHN treated with the 5% lidocaine patch for various lengths of time demonstrated that the brain activity occurring with the spontaneous pain of PHN appeared to be modulated in a manner related to the length of application of this medication, thus suggesting again that a peripherally acting agent may have an impact on CNS pain mechanisms.

Another commercially available local anesthetic preparation is the EMLA cream. Its FDA approved indication is for use on normal intact skin for analgesia, but it is not FDA approved for any specific neuropathic pain disorder. Several studies of EMLA cream for the treatment of PHN have reported mixed results. While EMLA cream alone did not show a significant difference in treatment compared to placebo in PHN, it provides excellent analgesia as a pretreatment to 8% capsaicin patch (Qutenza). The results of two uncontrolled studies were more favorable and suggested that the use of EMLA cream could relieve the pain associated with PHN. ,

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here