Role of classical cannabinoid receptors in cancer-associated bone disease


Abbreviations

2-AG

2-Arachidonoylglycerol

ACEA

Arachidonyl-2-chloroethylamide

CB1

Cannabinoid receptor type 1

CB2

CB type 2

CB

Cannabinoid

CBD

Cannabidiol

Endocannabinoid

Endogenous cannabinoid

FAAH

Fatty acid amide hydrolase

GFP

Green fluorescent protein

IC50

Half-maximal inhibitory concentration

MAGL

Monoacylglycerol lipase

Micro-CT

Micro–computed tomography

MM

Multiple myeloma

THC

Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank laboratory technicians, students, researchers, and leaders who dedicated their time and resources for testing novel and standard cannabinoids in preclinical models of cancer, and the Arthritis Research UK, Bone Cancer Research Trust, and Breast Cancer Now for financial support of our research in this area.

Conflict of interest

A.I. Idris is an inventor on a patent and cofounder of start-up companies concerning the therapeutic use of NF-κB inhibitors for the treatment of inflammation and cancer.

Introduction

The endocannabinoid system has been implicated in the regulation of various aspects of cancer including primary tumor growth, early and late metastases, cachexia, and pain [ ]. Skeletal-related events and bone pain are major causes of cancer-related morbidity, reduced quality of life, and death in patients with advanced cancers of bone, breast, and prostate origins [ ]. Pharmacological and genetic manipulation of the classical cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) and type 2 (CB2), orphan receptor GPR55, and other related receptors such as vanilloid receptors affect bone remodeling in preclinical models of estrogen deficiency, arthritis, and age-related bone diseases [ , ]. In recent years, an increasing number of studies have implicated the endocannabinoid system and related systems in the initiation and progression of cancer-associated bone disease. Modulation of cannabinoid receptors and enzymes by pharmacological and molecular biology approaches have been found to affect all aspects of bone remodeling and pain in animal models of primary bone cancer and bone metastasis ( Fig. 23.1 ) [ , , , ]. The forthcoming sections review these studies, and argue the notion that administration of natural and/or synthetic cannabinoid ligands is of value in the management of skeletal and nonskeletal complications associated with metastatic cancer.

Figure 23.1, The effects of boosting the level of the endogenous cannabinoid 2-AG or exposure to cannabinoid receptor agonists on skeletal complications associated with primary bone and metastatic cancers. Refer to text for details and abbreviations.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here