Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogeneous group of malignant tumors derived from primitive mesenchymal cells. These tumors arise from muscle, connective tissue, supportive tissue, and vascular tissue. As a group, they are locally highly invasive and have a high propensity for local recurrence. They usually metastasize via the bloodstream and, less commonly, via the lymphatics. The STS can be divided into two groups:
rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS)
non-RMS STS (NRSTS)
STS account for 7% of childhood malignancies. RMS accounts for 40% of STS and RMS is the most common pediatric STS, with an incidence of 4–5 per million in children less than 15 years old.
RMS is the third most common solid extracranial tumor, following neuroblastoma and Wilms’ tumor.
RMS accounts for 3% of all malignant neoplasms in children, with approximately 400 new cases diagnosed in the United States each year in children under 19 years of age.
Approximately one-third of cases of RMS are in children less than 5 years of age and 60% of cases are diagnosed in children less than 10 of age.
In RMS, there is a slight male predominance with a male:female ratio of 1.4:1; however, adolescent patients are disproportionately males.
RMS incidence in African-American females is half that of Caucasian females. The incidence is lower in Asian populations residing in Asia or the West.
NRSTS comprise a diverse group of malignancies. Although each type is rare, together they constitute about 60% of all pediatric STS with an incidence of six to eight cases per million in children less than 20 years of age. There are approximately 550–600 new NRSTS cases per year in the United States, which represents 4% of all pediatric malignancies. Among the NRSTS the most common subtypes include synovial sarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs), dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP), malignant fibrous histiocytoma, and fibrosarcoma. Tumors typically found in children under 5 years of age are infantile fibrosarcoma and infantile hemangioperiocytoma. Males are affected slightly more than females and African-Americans are affected slightly more often than Caucasians.
Most cases of STS occur sporadically but up to 30% of cases may have an underlying risk factor, which may include:
Germline mutations of the p53 suppressor gene, as in Li–Fraumeni familial cancer syndrome. There is an association between early-onset breast cancer, sarcomas, brain tumors, and adrenocortical tumors in family members.
Ionizing radiation.
Neurofibromatosis ( NF1 )—patients with NF1 have up to a 15% lifetime risk of developing an MPNST associated with chromosome 17 deletions.
Syndromes such as Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome and Costello syndrome (a genetic disorder characterized by delayed development and mental retardation, unusually flexible joints, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, short stature, and an increased risk of developing tumors, with the most frequent being RMS).
DICER1 mutations—familial pleuropulmonary blastoma predisposition syndrome increases the risk of developing tumors, including embryonal RMS (ERMS).
Maternal and paternal use of marijuana and cocaine and first-trimester prenatal X-ray exposure, possibly as an environmental interaction with a genetic trigger.
Immunohistochemistry, molecular diagnostics, including reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization may be necessary to differentiate RMS and NRSTS from the other small-round-blue-cell tumors of childhood (i.e., lymphoma, Ewing sarcoma, neuroblastoma). There are various chromosomal translocations that are characteristics of NRSTS, which have led to the refinement of the histopathological classification of pediatric STS. Table 25.1 summarizes the clinical and biological features of NRSTS. Table 25.2 lists the histologic subtypes of RMS with reference to their morphology, site of origin, and age distribution.
Tumor a | Cell origin/cytogenetics/product | Common sites | Common ages | Good prognostic factors b | Outcome | Therapy |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Synovial sarcoma | Mesenchymal cells/t(X;18)(p11q11)/ SSX1–SYT (seen in biphasic tumors) SSX2–SYT (seen in monophasic tumors)/translocation present in >90%, MYCN overexpression | Extremities (lower twice as common as upper extremity) | Adolescence/young adulthood, accounts for 30% of pediatric NRSTS | Age ≤14 years, size <5 cm, calcification, chemosensitive | Stages I and II, 70%; stages III and IV, poor | WLE with/without RT chemo: ifosfamide/doxorubicin |
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) | Dermis/t(17;22)(q21;q13) ring chromosome/ COL1A1–PDGFB | Trunk and proximal limbs, rare head, and neck | 20–50 years, rare in childhood | Complete excision, local recurrence 60% with incomplete resection | WLE (3 cm) margin pseudopod-like projections with Mohs micrographic surgery, RT has been used when WLE not possible, imatinib for unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease | |
MFH aka undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma | Unknown/19p+, complex abnormalities | Lower extremity, trunk, head and neck | In children, 10–20 years, 40–60 years common radiation-induced sarcoma | Extremity site | 5-year survival, 27–53% | WLE chemo: ifosfamide/doxorubicin |
Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma | Fibroblast/t(2;22)(q34;q12)t(12;16)(q13;p11) t(12;22)(q13;q12)/ EWSR1–CREB1 TLS–ATF1 EWSR1–ATF1 | Extremity, trunk and head and neck (subcutis may infiltrate dermis or muscle) | Young children and young adults | Much less aggressive than MFH | Excellent with surgery alone | WLE |
MPNST | Schwann cell or fibroblast/17q;22q loss or rearrangement, complex abnormalities in high-grade tumors | Extremity, retroperitoneum trunk | Younger patients with neurofibromatosis (NF1) develop in 10% patients with NF1 and 20–60% cases of MPNST occur in association with NF1 | Size <5 cm, no NF1 | 53% survival without NF, 16% with NF | WLE with/without RT chemo: neoadjuvant role, ifosfamide/doxorubicin |
Fibrosarcoma | Fibroblast/t(X;18), t(2;5), t(7;22) | Truncal/Proximal site | Adolescence | 5-year survival 34–60% | WLE with/without RT chemo: no established role | |
Infantile fibrosarcoma | Fibroblast/t(12;15)(p13;q25)/ ETV6–NTRK3 | Distal extremity | Most <2 years | <5 years | 5-year survival 84% | WLE, RT/chemo if WLE not possible historically, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (with VA±C). However, the use of molecular targeting with NTRK inhibitor for up to 26 cycles has had dramatic results and should be considered first-line therapy |
Leiomyosarcoma | Deletion 1p, other complex abnormalities, Smooth muscle-uterine t(12;14)(q15;q24); HMGA2 rearrangement | Retroperitoneum GI tract, any soft-tissue or vascular area | 40–70 years, when in children, any age, associated with human immunodeficiency virus related to EBV infection, reported in patients who received RT for retinoblastoma and Carney triad c | <5 cm | 33% disease-free survival at 1–5 years | WLE chemo: ifosfamide/doxorubicin or gemcitabine/docetaxel |
Alveolar soft part sarcoma | (?)Unknown/t(X;17)(p11;q25)/ ASPSCR1–TFE3 | Orbit, head and neck, lower extremity | 15–35 years | Young age, orbital site, <5 cm | 5-year survival 27–59% (indolent; death from disease after 10–20 years) 79% metastatic disease, including brain | WLE chemo or RT only after recurrence chemo: no clear role. Possible role of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors being explored |
Hemangiopericytoma infantile form (<1 year of age) | Pericytes/t(12;19)(q13;q13)/t(13;22)(q22;q11) | Extremity, retroperitoneum head and neck extremity, trunk | 20–70 years, when in children, 10–20 years rare, but typically, 1 year | Low stage, <5 cm, infantile form | Stages I and II, 30–70% 5-year survival with adjuvant therapy stages III and IV, poor infantile—excellent with surgery alone | WLE, with/without RT chemo: no established role but can be chemoresponsive, infantile form responds more favorably to chemotherapy |
Liposarcoma (myxoid) | Primitive mesenchyme/t(12;16)(q13p11)/ FUS–DDIT3 | Extremity, retroperitoneum | 0–2 years and second decade; sixth decade most common | Child, myxoid type | Very good with WLE, rarely metastasizes | WLE, with/without RT RT important in retroperitoneal lesions chemo: no established role |
Clear cell sarcoma | Mesoderm, melanin deposits t(12;22)(p13; q12)/ EWSR1–ATF1 | Tendons and aponeuroses of lower extremity | Young adults, females | <5 cm, no necrosis, nonmetastatic | Adverse prognosis; 5-year survival rates of 60–70%. However, only 30–40% are long-term survivors due to late recurrences | WLE with sentinel node biopsy no clear role for adjuvant chemotherapy. Potential role for immunotherapy (e.g., translocation-targeted vaccines, interferon, GM-CSF-secreting vaccine) |
Epithelioid sarcoma | Inactivation of INI1 (hSNF5/SMAR CB1) located on chromosome 22q11.2 | Distal extremities (especially hands) | Young adult | Younger age, distal tumor location, no necrosis or vascular invasion, negative nodal status, and microscopic complete resection | Tumor is highly aggressive and has a propensity for lymph node metastatses. Localized smaller tumors have better prognosis | WLE with sentinel lymph node biopsy±RT and/or chemo: ifosfamide/doxorubicin. Clinical trial for use of tazemetostat recently completed. Approval for patients with metastatic or locally advanced epithelioid sarcoma not eligible for complete resection |
a Listed in order of decreasing incidence.
b Low histologic grade and low stage are good prognostic factors.
c Carney triad: A condition consisting of gastric epithelioid leiomyosarcoma, pulmonary chondroma, functioning extraadrenal paraganglioma.
Pathologic subtype | Morphology | Usual site of origin | Usual age (years) distribution |
---|---|---|---|
Embryonal (ERMS) solid | Resembles skeletal muscle in 7- to 10-week fetus. Moderately cellular with loose myxoid stroma. Actin and desmin positive; myogenin scattered positivity <50% | Head and neck, orbit, genitourinary tract | 3–12 |
Botryoid variant | Only one microscopic field of cambium layer necessary to diagnose as botryoid. Grossly presents with grape-like configuration | Bladder, vagina, nasopharynx, bile duct | 0–8 |
Spindle cell/sclerosing variant a | Spindle-shaped cells with elongated nuclei and prominent nucleoli. Low cellularity. Collagen-rich and -poor variants. Sclerosing is a variant pattern of spindle cell RMS with pseudovascular and cord-like patterns in dense hyalinized stroma | Paratesticular, head and neck | 2–12 |
Alveolar (ARMS) | Resembles skeletal muscle in 10- to 21-week fetus. Basic cell is round with scanty eosinophilic cytoplasm; alveolar pattern may be lost if densely packed; cross striations more common than embryonal variety. Up to one-third of ARMS-negative tumors are actually dense pattern ERMS. Diffuse myogenin positivity. ARMS requires confirmation of PAX3/7-FKHR ( FOXO1 ) translocation | Extremities, trunk, perineum (adolescents) | 6–21 |
RMS, NOS | Heterogeneous, unable to subtype due to paucity of tissue | Extremities, trunk | 6–21 |
a Spindle cell RMS in adults is a distinct clinical entity with more aggressive behavior than in the pediatric population.
Alveolar RMS (ARMS) has a characteristic translocation of the FOXO1 gene (previously known as Forkhead, or FKHR ) at 13q14 with PAX3 at 2q35 or less commonly PAX7 at 1p36. The fusion protein functions as a transcription factor that activates transcription from PAX-binding sites that are 10–100 times more active than wild-type PAX7 and PAX3 . This alteration in growth, differentiation, and apoptosis results in tumorigenic behavior. Approximately 75% of ARMSs contain the FOXO1–PAX3 translocation; the remaining 25% contain the FOXO1–PAX7 translocation. Recently, PAX–FOXO1 fusion was identified to be a poor prognostic indicator with lower event-free survival for low- and intermediate-risk disease. Of the two translocations, PAX7–FOXO1 appears to have a more favorable outcome. This outcome analysis has led to the novel modification to classification and treatment protocols. In regards to metastatic disease, fusion status was not an independent predictor of outcome (clinical risk factor remains the major predictor).
ERMS has a loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the 11p15.5 locus. This LOH involves loss of the imprinted maternal genetic information and all that remains is expression of the paternal genetic material. This LOH includes loss of tumor suppressor genes that have been implicated in oncogenesis that results in the overproduction of insulin-related growth factor-II (IGF-II). IGF-II stimulates the growth of RMS and blockade of one of its receptors, insulin like growth factor-I receptor (IGF-IR), inhibits RMS growth both in vitro and in vivo.
“Translocation-negative” ARMSs (i.e., tumors that have an alveolar pattern on routine light microscopy but lack the defining FOXO1–PAX translocation) represent approximately 25% of cases of ARMS and have been demonstrated conclusively to cluster genomically and clinically with ERMS. The subset of cases with low-risk clinical features will be considered low-risk fusion-negative RMS in future Children’s Oncology Group (COG) clinical trials.
Spindle cell/sclerosing RMS constitutes a less common subtype of ERMS that may be seen in children and adults. They appear to have distinctive genetic features and clinical behavior in each group: in children cases occur in the paratesticular region and typically have a favorable prognosis. Recurrent NCOA2 translocations have also been described in cases of infantile/congenital spindle cell RMS with very good outcomes. Conversely, adults typically have more aggressively behaving disease. There is growing evidence that many of these tumors (especially with sclerosing histology) contain MYOD1 (L122R) mutation, which appears to be associated with relatively aggressive clinical course in both populations.
RMS may occur in any anatomic location of the body where there is skeletal muscle, as well as in sites where no skeletal muscle is found (e.g., urinary bladder, common bile duct). RMS in children under 10 years of age generally involves the head and neck or genitourinary areas. Adolescents more commonly develop extremity, truncal, or paratesticular lesions. Table 25.3 lists the relative frequency of the various primary sites and sites of regional spread and distant metastases.
Primary site | Relative frequency (%) | Regional spread and distant metastatic sites |
---|---|---|
Head and neck | 40 | |
Orbit | 8 | Nodes rarely involved; rare lung metastasis |
Parameningeal a | 25 | Regional spread to bone, meninges, brain; lung and bone metastases |
Other b | 7 | Nodes rarely involved; lung metastases |
Genitourinary tract | 29 | |
Bladder, prostate | 10 | Nodes rarely involved; metastases to lung, bone, and bone marrow (primarily prostate primaries) |
Vagina, uterus | 5 | Nodes rarely involved; metastases to retroperitoneal nodes (mainly from uterus) |
Paratesticular | 14 | Retroperitoneal nodes in up to 50% of boys 10 or older; metastases to lung and bone |
Extremities | 14 | Nodes involved in up to 50% of cases; metastases to lung, bone marrow, bone, central nervous system |
Trunk | 12 | Nodes rarely involved; metastases to lung and bone |
Other | 5 | Nodal involvement site-dependent (increased in perineal/perianal primaries); metastases to lung, bone, and liver |
a Parameningeal sites are adjacent to the meninges at the base of the skull; they consist of nasopharynx, middle ear, paranasal sinuses, and infratemporal and pterygopalatine fossae.
b Nonorbital, nonparameningeal sites consist of larynx, oropharynx, oral cavity, parotid, cheek, and scalp.
NRSTS can arise in any tissue but are extremely uncommon in bone. Approximately half of NRSTS arise in extremities. The remaining NRSTS are divided between trunk, head and neck, and visceral/retroperitoneal sites.
Most STS present as painless masses. Symptoms depend on the location and invasion of the adjacent normal structures.
Specific clinical manifestations vary with the site of origin of the primary lesion and are outlined in Table 25.4 . About 50% of RMSs of head and neck primary tumors (nasopharynx, sinuses, middle ear) have infiltration of tumor through the skull base with intracranial extension of disease that may manifest as cranial nerve palsies with or without headache and/or other signs of raised intracranial pressure.
Location | Signs and symptoms |
---|---|
Head and neck a | |
Neck | Soft-tissue mass |
Hoarseness | |
Dysphagia | |
Nasopharynx | Sinusitis |
Local pain and swelling | |
Epistaxis | |
Paranasal sinus | Sinus obstruction/sinusitis |
Unilateral nasal discharge | |
Local pain and swelling | |
Epistaxis | |
Middle ear/mastoid | Chronic otitis media—purulent blood-stained discharge |
Polypoid mass in external canal | |
Peripheral facial nerve palsy | |
Orbit | Proptosis |
Ocular palsies | |
Conjunctival mass | |
Genitourinary | |
Vagina and uterus | Vaginal bleeding |
Grapelike clustered mass protruding through vaginal or cervical opening (i.e., sarcoma botryoides) | |
Prostate | Hematuria |
Constipation | |
Urinary obstruction | |
Bladder | Urinary obstruction |
Hematuria | |
Tumor extrusion | |
Recurrent urinary tract infections | |
Paratesticular | Painless scrotal or inguinal mass |
Retroperitoneum | Abdominal pain |
Abdominal mass | |
Intestinal obstruction | |
Biliary tract | Obstructive jaundice |
Pelvic | Constipation |
Genitourinary obstruction | |
Extremity/trunk | Asymptomatic or painful mass |
a All can extend through multiple foramina and fissures into the epidural space and infiltrate the central nervous system with cranial nerve palsies, meningeal symptoms, and brain stem signs.
Rare primary sites for RMS include the gastrointestinal–hepatobiliary tract (3%), where it presents with obstructive jaundice and a large abdominal mass. These tumors arise in the common bile duct and may extend into both lobes of the liver. Other rare primary sites are the intrathoracic region (2%) and the perineal–perianal area (2%).
Approximately 20% of RMSs have metastatic disease at diagnosis and the most common sites are bone marrow and lung, followed by lymph nodes and bone.
NRSTS rarely presents with systemic symptoms. Up to 15% of patients present with metastatic disease, most commonly to the lung. Nodal spread is rarely seen except with epithelioid sarcoma and clear cell sarcoma. Rarely bone, liver, and subcutaneous and brain metastases are seen, and bone marrow involvement is exceedingly rare.
The diagnostic evaluation should delineate the extent of the primary tumor and the location and extent of metastatic disease and should consist of the following:
Complete history and physical examination , including measurements of the primary tumor and assessment of regional lymph nodes.
Laboratory tests :
Complete blood count.
Comprehensive metabolic panel.
LDH (tends to be elevated in cases of advanced disease, and its trend over time often correlates with response to treatment and/or progression of disease).
Urinalysis.
Coagulation profile (in cases of advanced-stage ARMS as these patients may present with tumor-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation.
Primary tumor imaging :
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess primary tumor.
Ultrasound for paratesticular, bladder/prostate, or biliary tree.
Metastatic workup:
Chest computed tomography (CT) to look for lung metastasis.
MRI/CT of draining lymph nodes. This is required in lower extremity and paratesticular primaries to optimally evaluate regional lymphadenopathy.
18 FDG-PET scan to assess primary and metastatic disease, as well as to monitor response to therapy. (Bone scan was traditionally performed to identify osseous metastases, but has been replaced by 18 FDG-PET scan, which has both greater sensitivity and specificity.)
Bilateral bone marrow aspiration and biopsy are not necessary in patients with noninvasive, node-negative tumors and in patients with node-negative invasive ERMS with negative CT chest and is not indicated for NRSTS.
Brain MRI is recommended in patients with widespread metastatic disease in NRSTS.
Additional diagnostic evaluation depending on primary site:
Dental evaluation with Panorex radiography for maxillary or mandibular disease.
Lumbar puncture for parameningeal head and neck disease.
Cystoscopy or vaginoscopy for bladder, prostate, or vaginal disease.
Surgical consultation for:
Percutaneous, incisional, or excisional biopsy. An adequate biopsy is critical for accurate diagnosis. Incisional biopsy is the gold standard; however, multiple core needle biopsies may be adequate. Core needle biopsies may not provide adequate tissue for molecular pathologic studies. Incisional and core biopsy tracks need to be resected at the time of definitive resection. Fine-needle aspiration is not acceptable.
Sampling of suspicious lymph nodes.
Sentinel lymph node evaluation is required for all RMS extremity primaries as well as in all epithelioid sarcoma and clear cell sarcomas regardless of findings on imaging.
Required ipsilateral retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for paratesticular RMS for boys 10 years and older.
Please note lymph nodes beyond regional basin area are considered metastatic disease ( Table 25.5 ).
Site | Regional nodal basin a |
---|---|
Extremity | |
Lower extremity b | Inguinal, femoral, popliteal nodes (rarely involved) |
Upper extremity b | Axillary, brachial, epitrochlear, infraclavicular nodes (infraclavicular) |
Genitourinary | |
Bladder/prostate | Pelvic, retroperitoneal nodes at renal artery level or below |
Cervix and uterus | Pelvic, retroperitoneal nodes at renal artery level or below |
Paratesticular b | Pelvic, retroperitoneal nodes at renal artery level or below |
Vagina | Retroperitoneal, pelvic nodes at or below common iliac inguinal nodes |
Vulva | Inguinal nodes |
Head and neck | |
Head/neck | Ipsilateral cervical, jugular, preauricular, occipital, supraclavicular nodes for laterally placed tumors (excluding scalp); may have bilateral lymphadenopathy with centrally placed tumors |
Orbit/eyelid | Ipsilateral jugular, preauricular, cervical nodes |
Intrathoracic | |
Intrathoracic | Internal mammary, mediastinal nodes |
Retroperitoneum/pelvis | |
Retroperitoneum/pelvis | Pelvic, retroperitoneal nodes |
Trunk | |
Abdominal wall | Inguinal, femoral nodes |
Chest wall | Axillary, internal mammary, infraclavicular nodes |
Other | |
Biliary | Liver hilar nodes |
Perianal/perineal | Inguinal, pelvic nodes; may be bilateral |
a Any tumor involved node for a specific site other than that those listed earlier is considered distant metastasis (Stage 4/Group IV).
b Any tumor involving the paratesticular region in boys > 10 years of age or involving the extremities, regardless of age, require lymph node dissection.
It is essential to fully stage RMS. The prognosis, selection of systemic therapy, and the design of optimal local therapy depend on the following:
primary site
histologic type
tumor size
degree of regional spread
nodal involvement
distant metastatic disease
extent of prechemotherapy tumor resection
The RMS staging systems consist of the following:
Pretreatment clinical stage : the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study incorporated the most significant prognostic variables (primary site, invasiveness, size, regional lymph node involvement) into a tumor–node–metastasis. The STS-COG staging system is provided in Table 25.6 .
Stage | Sites | T invasiveness | T size | N | M a |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | Favorable sites Orbit, head, and neck (excluding parameningeal), genitourinary (nonbladder/nonprostate) | T1 or T2 | a or b | N0 or N1 or NX | M0 |
II | Unfavorable sites Bladder/prostate, extremity cranial parameningeal other (includes trunk and retroperitoneum) | T1 or T2 | a | N0 or NX | M0 |
III | Unfavorable sites Bladder/prostate, extremity cranial parameningeal other (includes trunk and retroperitoneum) | T1 or T2 | a, b | N1 N0 or N1 or NX | M0 |
IV | Any sites | T1 or T2 | a or b | N0 or N1 | M1 |
a Distant metastatic disease consists of lung, liver, bones, bone marrow, brain, and distant muscle and nodes. The presence of positive cytology in CSF, pleural, or abdominal fluids, as well as implants on pleural or peritoneal surfaces, also constitutes stage IV disease.
Postoperative clinical group : this is based on the extent of the surgical resection and takes into account the lymph node evaluation ( Table 25.7 ). In some locations, when complete resection is possible with negative margins, overall survival is improved.
Group | Definition (incidence) |
---|---|
I. | No residual disease (16%) |
A. Localized, completely resected, confined to site of origin | |
B. Localized, completely resected, infiltrated beyond site of origin | |
II. | Microscopic residual disease (20%) |
A. Margins positive, lymph nodes negative | |
B. Margins negative, lymph nodes positive | |
C. Margins positive, lymph nodes positive | |
III. | Gross residual disease (48%) |
A. Biopsy only | |
B. Grossly visible disease after 50% resection of primary tumor | |
IV. | Distant metastasis present at diagnosis (16%) |
Risk group classification ( Table 25.8 ): the risk group classification and treatment has been based on the combination of pretreatment stage, postoperative clinical group, and histology. In the most recent COG trial (ARST-1431), fusion status was also included in the risk group classification.
Risk group | Fusion status | Pretreatment stage | Postoperative clinical group | EFS (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Low | (FN-RMS) | 1 (all favorable sites) | I or II | 85–95 |
(FN-RMS) | 1 (orbit only) | III | ||
(FN-RMS) | 2 (unfavorable sites ≤5 cm) | I or II | ||
Intermediate | (FN-RMS) | 1 (nonorbit only) | III | 70–85 |
2, 3 | III | 65–75 | ||
3 (unfavorable sites >5 cm, or unfavorable site, any size, with regional nodal involvement) | I or II | 70–85 | ||
4 (under 10 years of age) | IV | 50–60 | ||
(FP-RMS) | 1, 2, 3 | I, II, III | 50–60 | |
High | (FN-RMS) | 4 (over 10 years of age) | IV | 20–40 |
High | (FP-RMS) | 4 | IV | 5–20 |
The low-risk group includes all nonmetastatic favorable-site ERMS (stage 1, regardless of degree of initial surgical resection) and completely resected (groups I and II) nonmetastatic unfavorable-site ERMS.
The intermediate-risk group includes all nonmetastatic alveolar tumors and embryonal tumors in unfavorable primary sites (stage 2 or 3) that have been incompletely resected (group III). Girls with nonbladder genitourinary tract ERMS treated without local radiation therapy have inferior outcomes and are now considered to have intermediate-risk disease (they had been previously classified as low-risk subset 2) . Their prognosis improves when treated with either intensified systemic therapy (cyclophosphamide at a dose of 2.2 g/m 2 /cycle) or “standard-intensity” systemic therapy (cyclophosphamide at 1.2 g/m 2 /cycle) combined with appropriate local therapy consisting of some combination of conservative surgery with either vaginal brachytherapy or external beam radiation therapy. In the past, children under the age of 10 years with ERMS and isolated lung metastases were considered in the high-risk group, but due to a more favorable prognosis they can be categorized to have intermediate-risk disease .
The high-risk group includes all metastatic tumors (both alveolar and embryonal) except for children under the age of 10 years with ERMS and isolated lung metastases. Since prognosis is determined by the risk group, the risk group classification determines treatment.
Staging using the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system incorporates tumor size (T), depth, nodal (N), and metastatic (M) involvement, and histologic grade (G). Risk stratification is based on tumor size, tumor grade, margins, resectability, and metastatic disease. In pediatric NRSTS, risk stratification with an emphasis on tumor size and resectability predicts outcome.
The low-risk group (~50% of patients) includes those whose primary tumor has been grossly resected, have nonmetastatic disease and whose pathology shows:
Low-grade tumors regardless of margin status
High-grade tumors ≤5 cm in size
The intermediate-risk group (~35% of patients) includes those with nonmetastatic disease and:
High-grade tumors that are grossly resected and greater than 5 cm in size
High-grade tumors that are unresectable and where a delayed resection is planned
The high-risk group (~15% of patients) includes those who have metastatic disease, irrespective of the pathological grade of the tumor.
Overall, RMS is curable in the majority of children (70% survival 5 years after diagnosis). The type of treatment failure differs among different risk groups. The failures are typically:
Local treatment failure for patients with nonmetastatic ERMS.
Regional and distant treatment failure for patients with nonmetastatic ARMS.
Distant treatment failure for patients with metastatic RMS.
Extent of disease is the most important prognostic factor. Children with localized, completely resected disease do better than those with widespread or disseminated disease.
Patients with gross residual disease after surgery (group III) have a statistically significantly lower 3-year failure free survival (FFS) of 73% compared with 83% and 86% FFS for groups I and II, respectively.
Patients with smaller tumors (≤5 cm) have improved survival compared to children with tumors greater than 5 cm in size.
Those with metastatic disease at diagnosis have the worst prognosis. Among those with metastatic disease, two or less metastases are significantly better than three or more.
Among patients with intermediate-risk disease, patients with alveolar histology have a worse prognosis, and the group with regional nodal involvement has a prognosis that approaches that of patients with conventionally defined “distant metastases.” The alveolar subtype is frequently associated with an extremity site, which is a poor prognostic factor. Of note, fusion-negative alveolar subtype with low-risk clinical features can have a more favorable prognosis.
Nonparameningeal head and neck sites, nonbladder/nonprostate male and female genitourinary tract sites and biliary tract are “favorable sites”; all other sites are “unfavorable.”
Children between 1 and 9 years of age have a better prognosis than those older than 9 years of age (83% vs 68% 3-year FFS). This finding might be due to the higher incidence of advanced disease and alveolar type in older children.
The high-risk group of patients has metastatic disease and represents approximately 20% of patients with RMS. Within this group, there is significant diversity of outcome. Patients with ERMS aged 1–9 years of age and lung-only metastases have 50% event free survival (EFS) and those with bone and bone marrow involvement at diagnosis having an overall survival less than 10%. The dominant risk of treatment failure is from the inability to control systemic disease, although local treatment failure also appears to be higher in patients with metastases at diagnosis.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here