Principles and Techniques of Operative Surgery Including Neurosurgery


Introduction

This chapter describes the operating environment and outlines the principles of operative surgery including those used in ‘minor’ surgical techniques. All of these should be understood by all doctors, not just surgeons, to help them appreciate the scope of surgery, to enable them to give meaningful explanations to patients before and after surgery and to help them assist intelligently at the operating table. Furthermore, most doctors are required to perform minor operations, emergency department procedures or invasive investigations at one time or another and these require knowledge of techniques.

Various suffixes derived from Greek and Latin are used in describing particular surgical techniques; these are summarised in Box 10.1 .

BOX 10.1
Surgical Terminology

  • oscopy =examination of a hollow viscus, body cavity or deep structure using an instrument specifically designed for the purpose, for example, gastroscopy, colonoscopy, laparoscopy, arthroscopy, bronchoscopy. The general term is endoscopy

  • ectomy =removal of an organ, for example, gastrectomy, orchidectomy (i.e., removal of testis), colectomy

  • orrhaphy =repair of tissues, for example, herniorrhaphy

  • ostomy =fashioning an artificial communication between a hollow viscus and the skin, for example, tracheostomy, colostomy, ileostomy. The term may also apply to artificial openings between different viscera intraabdominally, for example, gastrojejunostomy, choledochoduodenostomy (i.e., anastomosis of duodenum to common bile duct)

  • otomy =cutting open, for example, laparotomy, arteriotomy, fasciotomy, thoracotomy

  • plasty =reconstruction, for example, pyloroplasty, mammoplasty, arthroplasty

  • pexy =relocation and securing in position, for example, orchidopexy (for undescended testis), rectopexy (for rectal prolapse)

Principles of Asepsis

Introduction

The main bacteria and viruses involved in surgical infections have been described in Chapter 3 . The chief sources of infection are the patients themselves (particularly bowel flora), less commonly the hospital environment, food or cross-infection from other patients, and occasionally bacteria and viruses carried by ward staff or theatre personnel. Rare sources of infection are contaminated surgical instruments or equipment, dressings or parenteral drugs and fluids. The viruses causing hepatitis B and C and particularly human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pose sinister risks of transmitting infection from patient to operating staff and vice versa. These risks make it mandatory to observe universal blood and body fluid precautions described in Chapter 3 .

Postoperative Infection

The risk of postoperative bacterial infection depends on the extent of contamination of the wound or body cavity at operation or, in the case of intestinal perforation, before operation. Bacteria enter a surgical site by five possible routes:

  • Direct inoculation from instruments and operating personnel

  • Airborne bacteria-laden particles

  • From the patient’s skin

  • From the flora of the patient’s internal viscera, especially large bowel

  • Via the bloodstream

Modern operating theatre design and correctly observed aseptic procedures minimise wound contamination but when infections occur, results can be devastating, especially in relation to artificial prostheses, skin grafts, bone and the eye. Furthermore, some patients are particularly vulnerable to infection, notably neonates, the immunosuppressed, the debilitated and the malnourished. Note that treatment of established infection is no substitute for prevention.

The use of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics began in the 1970s and has revolutionised the outcome of certain types of operative surgery in a manner comparable to the changes heralded by Lister’s introduction of antisepsis in the late 19th century.

It is also important to consider Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD) , a rare disorder caused by accumulation of an abnormal prion protein in the brain and lymphoreticular tissues resulting in fatal neurodegeneration. The variant form (vCJD) is potentially transmissible through certain (usually neurosurgical) procedures. It is common practice to assess a patient’s risk of CJD before surgery as prions are resistant to standard chemical and physical decontamination regimens. Surgical instruments that come into contact with tissues at particularly high risk of infection (i.e., brain, spinal cord, eyes) need stringent chemical and autoclave sterilisation. Instruments used on ‘high-risk’ tissues in patients with confirmed or suspected CJD require quarantining or destruction if single-use disposable instruments cannot be used.

The Operating Environment

Modern operating theatre design plays a key role in control of airborne wound contamination. This is important mainly for staphylococci carried on airborne skin scales.

The main factors influencing airborne operating theatre infection rates are:

  • the concentration of organisms in the air;

  • the size of bacteria-laden particles;

  • the duration of exposure of the open wound.

The first two are influenced mainly by theatre design and air supply, and the last can be minimised by avoiding unnecessarily long procedures. Operating theatre complexes are laid out so as to minimise introduction of infection from outside via air, personnel or patients. Air is drawn from the relatively clean external environment, filtered and then supplied to the theatres at a slightly higher pressure than outside to ensure a constant outward flow. Air turnover is the most important factor; the aim is to ensure 3 to 15 air changes per hour which ‘scrubs out’ the theatre air by dilution. Standard air delivery systems aim to achieve a constant flow of clean air towards the operating table, which is then exhausted from the theatre. Despite this, convection currents allow some recirculation of air, which may be contaminated, into the operation site.

The crucial importance of preventing infection in joint replacement surgery led to the development of sophisticated ultra-clean air delivery systems . These reduce postoperative infection two- to fourfold in joint replacement surgery, but the cost is very high. Enclosure of the patient in a sterile tent in which the surgeons wear space-type suits can reduce infection rates by a further 5% to 7.5%. However, correct use of prophylactic antibiotics gives better reduction in infection rates than any clean air system.

Minimising Infection From Operating Theatre Personnel

Only a modest proportion of wound infections derive from theatre personnel. Bacteria reach the wound via the air or by direct inoculation, often from viscera within the wound. About 30% of healthy people carry Staphylococcus aureus in the nose but pathogenic organisms may also be present in axillae and the perineal area, the last probably being the most important source of wound infections from theatre personnel. In addition, skin abrasions are usually infected, as are skin pustules and boils; thus personnel with these lesions must ensure that they are effectively covered with occlusive dressings or else should not enter the operating area.

Airborne, personnel-derived infection is reduced by changing from potentially contaminated day clothes to clean theatre clothes and shoes which should not be worn outside the theatre complex. Trouser cuffs should be elasticated or tucked into boots. Face masks are worn to deflect bacteria-containing droplets in expired air, but most types become ineffective after a very short period, especially when wet. With the exception of nasal Staph. aureus (particularly important in prostheses infection), bacteria derived from the head do not generally cause wound infection. The effectiveness of wearing masks and hair coverings to reduce infection is unknown.

Sterile gloves and gowns are worn by surgeons and staff directly involved in the operation to prevent inoculation of bacteria. Gloves are impermeable to bacteria but hands and forearms need washing before gloving and gowning with antiseptics that persist on the skin. This minimises bacterial contamination if a glove is punctured (as often happens) or the sleeve of the gown becomes wet. The traditional ritual of scrubbing with a brush for 3 minutes is actually less effective than washing the hands thoroughly because scrubbing causes microtrauma and brings bacteria to the surface.

Despite the protection given by wearing gloves and gown, the less a wound is handled, the better. This principle applies particularly when aseptic conditions are less than ideal. On the ward, lesser procedures, such as bladder catheterisation or chest drain insertion should be performed using sterile precautions and a no-touch technique .

Minimising Infection From the Patient’s Skin

The patient’s skin, especially the perineal area, is the source of up to half of all wound infections.

These may be minimised by the following measures:

  • Removing body hair —body hair was thought to be a source of wound contamination but this is no longer believed. Hair is removed only to allow the incision site to be seen and the wound to be closed without including hair. Shaving produces abrasions which rapidly become colonised with skin commensals. Most surgeons now restrict hair removal to clipping away just enough to provide skin access, which should be performed just before making the incision.

  • Cleaning the skin with antiseptic solutions —chlorhexidine in alcoholic solution (or aqueous solution for mucous membranes) has been shown superior to povidone-iodine when applied to a wide area around the proposed operation site (‘skin prep’). This should be allowed to dry before the incision to be effective. Alcohol-containing antiseptic solutions should be used with caution, especially if diathermy is used, owing to the risk of fire. In abdominal surgery, these solutions can pool, particularly in the umbilicus and around the flanks.

  • Draping the patient —the operating area is isolated by placing sterile, (ideally self-adhesive) drapes made of impermeable paper or coated waterproof material over all but the immediate field of operation.

Reducing Infection From Internal Viscera

The large bowel teems with potentially pathogenic bacteria and the peritoneal cavity inevitably becomes contaminated in any operation where large bowel is opened. Pathogenic bacteria are also found in obstructed small bowel. The same applies to the stomach and small bowel of patients on proton-pump inhibitors where the normal bactericidal effect of gastric acid is lost. Great care should be taken at operation to minimise this contamination. Mechanical bowel preparation of the colon along with selective antibiotic decontamination before operation have been shown to help this process. Patients having bowel operations should be given prophylactic antibiotics before operation according to local microbiology guidelines.

TABLE 10.1
Time and Temperature Requirements for Sterilisation by Different Methods
Method Equipment to Be Sterilised Temperature Time
Steam autoclave Unwrapped instruments and bowls
Instrument sets, dressings and rubber
123°C 10 min
126°C 3 min
Ethylene oxide gas Selected heat-sensitive materials; plastics, electrical equipment 55°C 2–24 h
Manual cleaning then endoscope washer disinfector (EWD) Flexible endoscopes Low temperature (guided by type of disinfectant and detergent used for decontamination) Guided by EWD manufacturer (around 30 min)

Sterilisation of Instruments and Other Supplies ( Table 10.1 )

In modern surgical practice, infection from instruments, swabs, equipment and intravenous (IV) fluids has been virtually eliminated if sterile packs are available from a central sterile supply department (CSSD). Reusable instruments and drapes are sterilised by high-pressure steam autoclaving according to strict protocols. Most disposable items are purchased in presterilised, sealed packs. Sterilisation in small autoclaves near the operating theatre should only be performed if instruments in short supply are required for successive operations and is not recommended. Sterilisation by any method is ineffective unless all organic material is first removed by thorough cleaning. It is also important to transport soiled instruments promptly to CSSD as proteinaceous material becomes fixed to metal and resistant to removal. This is especially true for small and microsurgical instruments (e.g., in ophthalmology), where channels easily become blocked by organic matter and prevent effective sterilisation.

Instruments which would be damaged by heat, including plastics and electrical equipment, can be sterilised using a range of chemical methods. Ethylene oxide gas is selectively used for items that are moisture and heat sensitive and cannot withstand high temperature or steam sterilisation, however its toxicity and potential hazard to staff (and patients) limits its use.

In processing flexible endoscopes, there should be a one-way flow of used instruments from the procedure room to the clean dispatch area to prevent cross-contamination. Instruments are manually cleaned with detergent, with brushing and flushing before automated endoscope disinfection in an endoscope washer disinfector. Aldehyde- and alcohol-based disinfectants are no longer recommended.

Worldwide, many surgical instruments are prepared by boiling water ‘sterilisers’. Boiling water is markedly inferior to other methods but is included here as it may be the only practical method in developing countries because of cost and technical difficulties. Boiling water kills most vegetative organisms within 15 minutes but spores are not killed. All organic debris should, as always, be scrupulously removed first, then the instruments immersed in visibly boiling water, returned to the boil and boiled continuously for at least 30 minutes to ensure hepatitis and HIV are destroyed.

Most bacteria infecting wounds during an operation do so by landing on the laid-out instruments in theatre rather than directly inoculating the wound itself.

Preoperative Preparation

For many elective operations, preoperative screening for methicillin-resistant Staph. aureus (MRSA) is commonly used. This involves taking bacterial swabs from the nose, groin and other places. If positive, local antibacterial cream and other measures reduce the risk of MRSA infection for the patient and the risk of cross-infection of other patients.

Surgical Technique

Surgical technique plays an important part in minimising the risk of operative infection. Non-vital tissue and collections of fluid and blood are vulnerable to colonisation by infecting organisms, which may then enter via the bloodstream even if direct contamination has been avoided by aseptic technique. Tissue damage should be kept to a minimum by careful handling and retraction and by avoiding unnecessary diathermy coagulation. Haematoma formation is minimised by careful haemostasis and placing drains into potential sites of fluid collection; closed-drainage or suction-drainage systems reduce the risk of organisms tracking back into the wound from the ward environment.

During extensive resections of bowel, early ligation of its blood supply allows bacteria to permeate the wall ( translocation ) and this may contaminate the peritoneal cavity. Prolonged operations are a recognised risk factor for postoperative surgical infections.

Faecal contamination is associated with a high risk of infection and great care needs to be taken in operations where the bowel is opened. In emergency operations for large bowel perforation, free faecal matter is meticulously removed. A planned ‘second-look’ laparotomy after 48 hours can be considered to deal with remaining contamination and new abscesses even if the patient appears well.

Prevention of Cross-Infection (Nosocomial Infection)

Cross-infection is the transfer of harmful bacteria from one person (or object) to another, or from one part of the body to another part. Strict policies on hand-washing, staff dress code being ‘bare below the elbow’, and universal access to alcoholic hand gel and education of staff and patients has reduced infection rates in hospitals. Cross-infection can still occur and is spread via staff, medical equipment, ward furnishings or rarely food. Doctors and nurses are still offenders as regards to transfer of infection—by removing dressings to inspect wounds in the open ward, by failing to wash hands between patients and by careless aseptic technique when performing ward procedures, such as bladder catheterisation or inserting IV catheters. Minimising patient movements between wards and hospital units also decreases cross-infection rates.

A patient with an infection that is potentially dangerous to other patients, such as MRSA, Clostridium difficile or extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) bacterial infections, should be isolated and barrier-nursed in a single room.

Prophylactic Antibiotics

Despite using the best aseptic techniques, some operations carry a high risk of wound infection as well as other infective complications; these can be reduced by using appropriate prophylactic antibiotics for selected procedures. The chosen antibiotics should be matched to the organisms likely to occur in the area of the operation and should be bactericidal rather than bacteriostatic ( Table 10.2 ). The relative risk of postoperative infection in different types of operation is summarised in Box 10.2 .

TABLE 10.2
Examples of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Clinical Conditions and Surgical Procedures a
Likely Organisms Antibiotic
Abdominal Surgery
Severe acute pancreatitis Enterobacteriaceae
Anaerobes
Co-amoxiclav OR
Ciprofloxacin 400 mg IV + metronidazole 500 mg IV
Colonic and other bowel surgery Enterobacteriaceae
Anaerobes
Staphylococcus aureus
Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A Strep. )
Co-amoxiclav 1.2 g IV
Appendicectomy Anaerobes Metronidazole OR co-amoxiclav
Endoscopic gastrostomy
Gastroduodenal surgery
Oesophageal surgery
Anaerobes
Staph. aureus
Strep. pyogenes (Group A Strep. )
Enterobacteriaceae
Candida spp.
Co-amoxiclav 1.2 g IV + fluconazole 400 mg IV
Inguinal or other hernia repair with mesh Staph. aureus
Staphylococcus epidermidis (coagulase-negative)
Strep. pyogenes (Group A Strep. )
Enterobacteriaceae
Co-amoxiclav 1.2 g IV
Hernia repair without mesh Not recommended
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Co-amoxiclav (but little clinical evidence of efficacy)
Orthopaedic Surgery
Total hip replacement or prosthetic knee joint Staph. aureus
Staph. epidermidis (coagulase-negative)
Strep. pyogenes (Group A Strep. )
Enterobacteriaceae
Flucloxacillin three doses plus gentamicin
If MRSA risk factors or known MRSA: vancomycin or teicoplanin for two doses
Trauma with contaminated wounds Staph. aureus
Strep. pyogenes (Group A Strep. )
Co-amoxiclav
If heavily contaminated or dead tissue, co-amoxiclav 1.2 g IV for 7 days
Elective orthopaedic surgery without prosthetic device Not recommended
Vascular Surgery
Lower limb amputation or vascular surgery, abdominal and lower limb Staph. aureus
Staph. epidermidis (coagulase-negative)
Strep. pyogenes (Group A Strep. )
Enterobacteriaceae
Co-amoxiclav 1.2 g IV
If MRSA, add vancomycin 1 g or teicoplanin IV
ENT Surgery
Head and neck surgery Staph. aureus
Strep. pyogenes (Group A Strep. )
Enterobacteriaceae
Anaerobes
Co-amoxiclav 1.2 g IV
If MRSA, add vancomycin 1 g IV
Ear, nose, sinus
Tonsillectomy
Not recommended
Urology
Transrectal prostate biopsy
Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) or laser enucleation
Enterobacteriaceae
Enterococcus
Ciprofloxacin 500 mg
Co-amoxiclav 1.2 g IV + gentamicin 120 mg IV
ENT, Ear, nose and throat; IV, intravenous; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus .

a Please also refer to local microbiology and national guidelines. Note that the antibiotic doses provided are a guide and refer to a normal weight adult with normal renal function. The European Medicines Agency advices restricting use of ciprofloxacin (and other quinolone antibiotics) due to tendon and joint risks.

BOX 10.2
Relative Risk of Infection in Surgical Wounds

Risk 2%–5%

Clean operations with no preoperative infection and no opening of gastrointestinal, respiratory or urinary tracts (e.g., inguinal herniorrhaphy, breast lump excision, ligation of varicose veins).

Risk Less Than 10%

Clean operations with gastrointestinal, respiratory or urinary tracts opened but with minimal contamination (e.g., elective cholecystectomy, transurethral prostatectomy excision of un-inflamed appendix).

Risk About 20%

Operations where tissues inevitably become contaminated but without preexisting infection (e.g., elective large bowel operations, appendicectomy where the appendix is perforated or gangrenous, fresh traumatic skin wounds [except on the face]).

Risk Greater Than 30%

Operations in the presence of infection (e.g., abscesses within body cavities, small bowel perforation, delayed operations on traumatic wounds).

Risk Greater Than 50%

Emergency colonic surgery (bowel unprepared) for perforation or obstruction.

As a general principle, pre- or perioperative prophylactic antibiotics are indicated if the anticipated risk of infection exceeds 10%, for example, all emergency abdominal surgery and all elective colonic operations. Prophylactic antibiotics are also used by many surgeons for operations in the 5% to 10% risk category, for example, cholecystectomy. Prophylactic antibiotics are also indicated for inherently low-risk cases where the consequences of infection would be catastrophic, for example, operations using prosthetic implants. Prophylactic antibiotics can reduce postoperative infection rates in high-risk cases by 75%, and may almost entirely eliminate infection where the risk is lower.

In most wound-related infections, the organisms are introduced during the operation and become established during the next 24 hours. Thus for prophylactic antibiotics to be effective, high blood levels must be achieved during the operation when contamination occurs. To achieve this, the first dose should be given within the hour before operation (for IV antibiotics) or within 2 hours for most oral options; prophylactic antibiotics should not be given earlier as this can encourage resistant organisms to proliferate ( Box 10.3 ). A single preoperative dose of antibiotic is generally sufficient, if it is rapidly bactericidal and the inoculum of bacteria is small; long operations with heavy blood loss, for example, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, merit a second perioperative dose of antibiotics later in the operation. Longer courses of prophylactic antibiotics are of no advantage.

BOX 10.3
Principles of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

  • A single dose of antibiotic is adequate for most purposes

  • Never continue prophylaxis for more than 48 hours; that becomes treatment

  • Dose should be administered immediately before the procedure

  • If the patient is already suspected of having an infection, go straight to treatment

In general, IV antibiotics give the most predictable blood levels and peak tissue levels are achieved within 1 hour of injection. However, for prophylaxis against anaerobes, metronidazole administered rectally gives blood and tissue levels equivalent to IV administration but later, 2 to 4 hours after administration.

Operations Involving Bowel and Biliary System

Patients having these operations are at risk mainly from a mixture of gram-negative bacilli (Enterobacteriaceae family), anaerobes ( Bacteroides fragilis ) and Staph. aureus . Less commonly, enterococci cause surgical infection, notably Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium.

The most commonly used prophylactic antibiotic regimens are shown below. A more comprehensive list is given in Table 10.2 :

  • For biliary surgery—co-amoxiclav.

  • For colonic and other bowel surgery—either co-amoxiclav or a combination of gentamicin, benzylpenicillin and metronidazole.

  • For appendicectomy—rectal metronidazole alone can be given 2 hours before operation; this has proved as effective as any other regimen.

The choice of antibiotics for prophylaxis must be kept under review because organisms change their sensitivities. Aminoglycosides such as gentamicin have the important advantage that they do not alter the bowel flora because their concentration in the lumen is low; this is in contrast to the cephalosporins and amoxicillin, which have caused a rising tide of beta-lactam–resistant bowel organisms insensitive to cephalosporins and ampicillin but susceptible to aminoglycosides. If MRSA is a problem, vancomycin or teicoplanin may become necessary for prophylaxis.

Operations Involving Implantation of Prostheses

Vascular grafts and joint replacements are at particular risk from Staph. aureus infection. Coagulase-negative slime-forming staphylococci (e.g., Staphylococcus epidermidis ) are a common source of chronic infection. Enterobacteriaceae are a very rare cause. Flucloxacillin is the agent of first choice for prophylaxis but gentamicin is usually added for extra protection. MRSA is becoming a common cause of prosthetic infection. In areas where the risk is substantial, prophylaxis with a glycopeptide (e.g., vancomycin or teicoplanin) is appropriate. Some implants such as Dacron grafts are impregnated with anti-bacterial agents.

Operations Where Ischaemic or Necrotic Muscle May Remain

Lower limb amputations for arterial insufficiency and major traumatic injuries involving muscle are susceptible to gas gangrene and tetanus. Clostridia are highly susceptible to benzylpenicillin and metronidazole, one of which should be given in high dose as early as possible after major trauma, and before major amputations for ischaemia. Co-amoxiclav is an alternative.

Basic Surgical Techniques

Anaesthesia

General Principles

Some form of anaesthesia is needed for almost every surgical procedure, with the aim of preventing pain in all cases, minimising stress for the patient in most, and providing special conditions for some operations, for example, muscular relaxation in abdominal surgery. The choice of anaesthetic techniques includes topical (surface) anaesthesia, local anaesthetic infiltration or peripheral nerve block, spinal or epidural anaesthesia and general anaesthesia . Methods other than general anaesthesia may be supplemented with IV sedation if the patient is anxious or agitated (e.g., with benzodiazepines). IV sedation with these drugs produces relaxation, anxiolysis and amnesia, whilst retaining protective reflexes. However, these drugs can also cause unconsciousness and they must be carefully titrated to produce just the desired effects. IV sedation of this type does not provide pain relief; if needed, this is achieved with local anaesthesia or IV analgesics.

Choice of Anaesthetic Technique

Combining local or regional anaesthesia (for pain relief) with general anaesthesia can minimise postoperative respiratory and cardiovascular depression compared with general anaesthesia alone, reducing morbidity. An example is the use of caudal anaesthesia in perineal operations. Local or regional anaesthesia with bupivacaine or levobupivacaine can also be administered during an operation to provide postoperative pain relief; for example, intercostal nerve blocks during an abdominal operation allow more comfortable breathing and coughing, reducing respiratory complications. Another common example is wound infiltration with the same long-acting local anaesthetics. The main factors influencing choice of anaesthesia are summarised in Box 10.4 .

BOX 10.4
Choice of Anaesthetic Technique

Local Anaesthesia

In general, this safest form of anaesthesia is used for calm and rational patients when no autonomic discomfort is anticipated:

  • Minor operations, for example, excision of small skin lesions or dental operations.

  • Minor but painful procedures, for example, insertion of chest drain, siting of peripheral venous cannulae.

  • Unavailability of general anaesthetic expertise, for example, in developing countries.

  • Patients unfit for general anaesthesia, for example, cardiac and respiratory cripples.

  • Ambulatory (‘day case’) surgery especially if comorbidity.

  • Patients unwilling to undergo general anaesthesia.

  • Use of combined local anaesthetic and vasoconstrictor to provide a relatively bloodless operative field. (Note: this must never be used in the extreme peripheries, i.e., digits, penis, nose.)

Regional Nerve Block

  • Minor surgery requiring wide field of anaesthesia, for example, femoral nerve block for varicose vein surgery, pudendal block for forceps delivery.

  • When it is undesirable to inject local anaesthetic into the operation site, for example, drainage of an abscess (local anaesthesia works less well in inflamed tissue).

  • To avoid tissue distortion from local infiltration in delicate surgery.

  • Short-lived, wide-field ambulatory anaesthesia for reduction of forearm fractures or hand surgery (Bier intravenous regional anaesthesia).

Epidural and Spinal Anaesthesia

  • Lower limb surgery, for example, amputations.

  • Lower abdominal, groin, pelvic and perineal surgery, for example, Caesarean sections, inguinal hernia repair, transurethral prostatectomy, bladder and urethral surgery.

Intravenous sedation or intravenous analgesia alone

  • Short-lived uncomfortable procedures where local anaesthesia is impractical, for example, gastrointestinal endoscopy, musculoskeletal manipulation.

Intravenous Sedation Combined With Local Anaesthesia

  • Potentially unpleasant procedures despite adequate local anaesthesia, for example, wisdom tooth extraction, toenail operations, siting of central venous lines.

Regional Analgesia With Light General Anaesthesia

  • Caudal epidural plus general anaesthesia for operations in the perineal area, for example, transurethral prostatectomy or resection of bladder tumours, haemorrhoidectomy, circumcision. This provides perioperative and postoperative analgesia.

General Anaesthesia

  • Where all aforementioned are unsuitable or difficult to achieve.

  • Severe patient apprehension or patient preference for general anaesthesia.

  • Major or prolonged operations.

  • Abdominal or thoracic operations requiring muscle relaxation.

  • Where it is necessary to secure the airway by intubation.

  • Special indications, for example, neurosurgery.

Incision Technique

Choice of Incision

The purpose of most skin incisions is to gain access to underlying tissues or body cavities. When planning an incision, the first concern is to achieve good access and to allow it to be extended if necessary. It must also be sited in such a way that it can be effectively closed to give the best chance of primary healing and the lowest chance of an incisional hernia later. Despite patients’ impressions, the length of an incision (and the number of sutures) has little bearing on the rate of healing, and the success of an operation should not be put at risk by inadequate access.

Secondary considerations in the choice of incision are as follows:

  • Orientation of skin tension lines (based on Langer lines) and skin creases —where possible, incisions should be made parallel to the lines of skin tension determined by the orientation of dermal collagen (e.g., a ‘collar’ incision for thyroid operations) as the wound is less likely to break down, there is minimal distortion, and healing occurs with little scar tissue to give the best cosmetic result

  • Strength and healing potential of the tissues —the nature and distribution of muscle and fascia influences the strength of the repair, particularly in different parts of the abdominal wall. For example, a vertical lower midline incision along the linea alba, a strong layer of fascia, is less prone to incisional herniation than a paramedian incision, lateral to the midline

  • The anatomy of underlying structures, particularly nerves —the incision line should run parallel to, but some distance away from the expected course of underlying structures, reducing the risk of damage. For example, to gain access to the submandibular gland, the incision is made 2 cm below the lower border of the mandible, to avoid the mandibular branch of the facial nerve

  • Cosmetic considerations —wherever possible, incisions should be placed in the least conspicuous position, such as in a skin crease or a site that will later be concealed by clothing or hair, for example, a transverse suprapubic ( Pfannenstiel or bucket-handle) incision below the ‘bikini’ line for operations on the bladder, uterus or ovary, or a periareolar incision for breast biopsy

Dissection and Handling of Deeper Tissues

The skin consists of thin epidermis and dense, somewhat thicker dermis , as well as the underlying fatty hypodermis, which may be 10 or more cm thick in an obese individual.

Once the skin incision has been made, the scalpel is reserved mainly for incising fascia and other fibrous structures, such as breast tissue, and for very fine dissection. Anatomic detail is exposed and displayed by a combination of blunt and sharp dissection. Blunt dissection involves teasing or stripping tissues apart using fingers, swabs or blunt instruments, following natural tissue planes. Sharp dissection with scissors and forceps or scalpel is used where tissues have to be cut and also to display small structures. Some surgeons prefer sharp to blunt dissection in general, believing it causes less tissue trauma. Most dissection, however, involves a combination of both.

Principles of Haemostasis

Bleeding is an unavoidable part of surgery. Blood loss should be minimised because bleeding obscures the operative field and hampers operative technique (the finer the surgery, the more bleeding affects visibility and quality of outcome), and because the loss has to be made up later. Excessive bleeding can be averted by judicious dissection with control of bleeding as the operation proceeds, and by minimising the area of raw tissue exposed at the operation site by accurately siting the incision and by avoiding opening unnecessary tissue planes.

Clipping, Ligation and Underrunning

Ligation or specialised bipolar diathermy is obligatory when large vessels are divided and is desirable for vessels larger than about 1 mm calibre ( Fig. 10.1 ). If the end of a bleeding vessel cannot be grasped by haemostat forceps, a suture can be used to encircle the vessel and its surrounding tissues, a technique often described as underrunning . It is particularly useful for a bleeding artery in the fibrous base of a peptic ulcer.

Fig. 10.1, Techniques of Haemostasis.

Diathermy

Diathermy achieves haemostasis by local intravascular coagulation and contraction of the vessel wall caused by heating ( -thermy ), generated by particular electrical waveforms. However, enough heat is also produced to burn the tissues and these may be needlessly damaged by careless use, particularly near the skin, nerves or bowel. Ordinary diathermy is ineffective for large vessels, which should be ligated. There are three main variants of diathermy, illustrated in Fig. 10.2 , and all three modes are available on modern diathermy machines.

Fig. 10.2, Three Modes of Diathermy.

Monopolar diathermy is the most widely used for operative haemostasis but there is wide dispersion of coagulating and heating effects, making it unsuitable for use near nerves and other delicate structures. Since the current passes through the patient’s body, there is a risk of coagulating vessels en passant (e.g., monopolar diathermy used in circumcision may cause penile thrombosis and therefore it is essential that only bipolar diathermy is used on the penis), as well as provoking arrhythmias in patients with cardiac pacemakers. Monopolar diathermy may also result in skin burns at the indifferent electrode plate if skin contact is poor or if the plate becomes wet during operation. To improve contact, hair should be shaved from the skin where the plate is placed.

Bipolar diathermy is used mainly for finer surgery, digits and the penis. The current passes only between the blades of the forceps and it requires fairly accurate grasping of the bleeding vessel. It uses low levels of electrical power, there is almost no electrical dispersion from the tip of the forceps and much less heat is generated. The main advantages are minimal tissue damage around the point of coagulation and safety in relation to nearby nerves, blood vessels and cardiac pacemakers. Specialised computer-controlled bipolar diathermy is often used for larger vessels during laparoscopic surgery.

Cutting diathermy is mainly used for dividing large masses of muscle (e.g., during thoracotomy or access to the hip joint) and cutting vascular tissues (e.g., breast). The intention is a form of sharp dissection, at the same time coagulating the numerous small blood vessels as the tissue is cut; unfortunately, this is not always wholly effective. A blend of cutting and coagulation is sometimes used.

Tourniquet and Exsanguination

This technique is used in surgery of the limbs and hands where a bloodless field is desirable. For the whole limb, a pneumatic tourniquet is placed proximally. The limb is exsanguinated by elevation and spiral application of a rubber bandage (Esmark) or a ring exsanguinator from the periphery; the tourniquet is then inflated. Upper limb tourniquets must not be left inflated for more than 30 minutes and lower limb tourniquets for more than about 1 hour to avoid the risk of necrosis.

Pressure

Pressure is a useful means of controlling bleeding until platelet aggregation, reactive vasoconstriction and blood coagulation take over. It can be used for emergency temporary control of severe arterial or venous bleeding, but is equally useful for controlling diffuse small-vessel bleeding from a raw area, for example, liver bed after cholecystectomy. Pressure is usually applied with gauze swabs which must be kept in position for at least 10 minutes by the clock. Even if bleeding is not arrested completely, this process usually allows a clearer view and facilitates haemostasis by standard means.

For intractable bleeding which is not amenable to ligature, diathermy or suture, various resorbable packing materials, for example, oxidised cellulose, can be left in position until haemostasis occurs, allowing the wound to be closed. If bleeding simply cannot be controlled—for example, after liver injury—the bleeding cavity can be packed with gauze swabs which are left in situ and removed 48 to 72 hours later at a further operation. Bleeding, once controlled by this method, rarely recurs.

When a raw cavity has been created beneath the skin, external pressure dressings are sometimes a useful method of controlling potential superficial postoperative oozing and minimising haematoma formation.

Suturing and Surgical Repair

Types of Suture Material and Needles

Numerous types of suture are available ( Box 10.5 ), with the most important distinction being between absorbable and non absorbable materials. The groups can be subdivided into natural and synthetic materials (although natural materials are being phased out) and further subdivided into monofilament and polyfilament (braided) materials. The choice of suture material depends upon the task at hand, the handling qualities and personal preference.

BOX 10.5
Suture Materials and Their Characteristics

Typical brand names are given in parentheses

Absorbable

  • Plain catgut—natural monofilament (no longer used)

  • Chromic catgut—natural monofilament (no longer used)

  • Polyglycolic acid-synthetic braided (Dexon)

  • Polyglactin—synthetic braided (Vicryl)

  • Polydioxanone—synthetic monofilament (PDS, Maxon)

Nonabsorbable

  • Silk—natural braided

  • Linen—natural braided (no longer used)

  • Stainless steel wire—monofilament or braided

  • Nylon—synthetic, usually monofilament (Ethilon)

  • Polyester—synthetic braided (Ti-cron, and others)

  • Polypropylene—synthetic monofilament (Prolene)

  • Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)—synthetic ‘expanded’ monofilament (Goretex)

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here