Preeclampsia and Hypertensive Disorders


Key Abbreviations

Acute fatty liver of pregnancy AFLP
Acute respiratory distress syndrome ARDS
Alanine transaminase ALT
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG
Angiotensin-converting enzyme ACE
Aspartate transaminase AST
Biophysical profile BPP
Blood pressure BP
Body mass index BMI
Central venous pressure CVP
Computed tomography CT
Confidence interval CI
Disseminated intravascular coagulation DIC
Electrocardiogram ECG
Electroencephalography EEG
False-positive rate FPR
Fetal growth restriction FGR
Gestational hypertension GH
Glomerular filtration rate GFR
Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets syndrome HELLP
Hemolytic uremic syndrome HUS
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy HDPs
Immune thrombocytopenic purpura ITP
Intrauterine growth restriction IUGR
Lactate dehydrogenase LDH
Low-dose aspirin LDA
Magnetic resonance imaging MRI
Mean arterial pressure MAP
Nonstress test NST
Placental-like growth factor PLGF
Positive predictive value PPV
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome PRES
Preeclampsia PE
Protein/creatinine ratio P/C ratio
Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure PCWP
Relative risk RR
Respiratory distress syndrome RDS
Small for gestational age SGA
Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 sFlt-1
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura TTP
Thromboxane A 2 TXA 2
US Preventive Services Task Force USPSTF
Vascular endothelial growth factor VEGF

Hypertensive disorders are among the most common medical complications of pregnancy; the reported incidence is between 5% and 10%, although incidence varies among different hospitals, regions, and countries. These disorders are a major cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity worldwide. The term hypertension in pregnancy is commonly used to describe a wide spectrum of patients who may have only mild elevations in blood pressure (BP) or severe hypertension with dysfunction of various organ systems. The clinical manifestations in these patients may be similar (e.g., hypertension, proteinuria); however, they may result from different underlying causes such as chronic hypertension, renal disease, or pure preeclampsia (PE). The three most common forms of hypertension that complicate pregnancy are (1) gestational hypertension (GH), (2) PE, and (3) chronic essential hypertension.

Definitions

Hypertension may be present before pregnancy, or it may be diagnosed for the first time during pregnancy. In addition, in some women, hypertension may become evident only during labor or during the postpartum period. For clinical purposes, women with hypertension may be classified into one of the three categories listed previously; these are described further in Table 38.1 . Recently, the diagnosis of PE and its subtypes have been expanded and revised by the members of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy :

TABLE 38.1
Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
Clinical Findings Chronic Hypertension Gestational Hypertension a Preeclampsia
Time of onset of hypertension <20 weeks >20 weeks Usually in third trimester
Degree of hypertension Mild or severe Mild Mild or severe
Proteinuria a Absent Absent Usually present
Cerebral symptoms May be present Absent Present in 30%
Hemoconcentration Absent Absent Severe disease
Thrombocytopenia Absent Absent Severe disease
Hepatic dysfunction Absent Absent Severe disease

a Defined as 1+ or more (or protein/creatinine ratio >0.30) by dipstick testing on two occasions or 300 mg or more in a 24-h urine collection or protein.

Gestational Hypertension

  • Systolic BP ≥140 mm Hg but less than 160 mm Hg or

  • Diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg but less than 110 mm Hg and

  • These pressures must be observed on at least two occasions 4 hours apart but no more than 7 days apart.

Severe Hypertension

Severe hypertension refers to sustained elevations in systolic BP to at least 160 mm Hg and/or in diastolic BP to at least 110 mm Hg for at least 4 hours or once if the patient received intravenous (IV) antihypertensive medications prior to the 4-hour period. In the most recent ACOG practice Bulletin, women who have severe GH are considered to have PE with severe features.

Proteinuria

Proteinuria may also be present before pregnancy, or it may be newly diagnosed during pregnancy. The definition of proteinuria is the same no matter when it occurs:

  • Greater than 0.3 g in a 24-hour urine collection or protein/creatinine (P/C) ratio greater than 0.3. If it is not possible to measure 24-hour protein or P/C ratio, proteinuria can be defined as a dipstick measurement of at least 1+ on two occasions.

  • Protein excretion in the urine increases in normal pregnancy from approximately 5 mg/dL in the first and second trimesters to 15 mg/dL in the third trimester. These low levels are not detected by dipstick. The concentration of urinary protein is influenced by contamination with vaginal secretions, blood, bacteria, or amniotic fluid. It also varies with urine specific gravity and pH, exercise, and posture. In addition, it is influenced by accuracy of the collection method, and total volume of urine collected.

  • Proteinuria usually appears after hypertension in the course of the disease process, but in some women, it may appear before hypertension.

Edema

Edema is defined as excessive weight gain (>4 lb [1.8 kg] in 1 week) in the second or third trimester, and it may be the first sign of the potential development of PE. However, 39% of patients with eclampsia do not have edema.

Preeclampsia and Eclampsia

PE is GH plus proteinuria or presence of symptoms consistent with PE. Box 38.1 lists criteria for diagnosis of GH and PE. The ACOG Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Group classifies PE based on whether it is has severe features. The term mild PE has been removed from the ACOG classification system and should not be used in clinical practice.

Box 38.1
Criteria for Mild Gestational Hypertension in Healthy Pregnant Women

  • Systolic blood pressure >140 mm Hg but <160 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure >90 mm Hg but <110 mm Hg

  • Proteinuria of <300 mg per 24-h collection

  • Platelet count of >100,000/mm 3

  • Normal liver enzymes

  • Absent maternal symptoms

  • Absent intrauterine growth restriction and oligohydramnios by ultrasound

It is recognized that some women with GH may have undiagnosed chronic hypertension, whereas others will subsequently progress to develop the clinical syndrome of PE. In general, the likelihood of progression to PE depends on gestational age at time of diagnosis, with higher rates if the onset of hypertension is before 35 weeks’ gestation ( Fig. 38.1 ).

Fig. 38.1, Rate of Progression From Gestational Hypertension to Preeclampsia by Gestational Age at Diagnosis.

Criteria for Preeclampsia or Gestational Hypertension With Severe Features

PE, or GH with severe features, is defined when either disorder is present in association with any of the following abnormalities:

  • Systolic BP greater than 160 mm Hg or diastolic BP greater than 110 mm Hg on two occasions at least 4 hours apart while the patient is on bedrest or once if the patient has received prior IV antihypertensive therapy. Prompt treatment is recommended for severe BP values that are sustained for longer than 30 minutes.

  • New-onset persistent cerebral symptoms (headaches) not responding to analgesia or visual disturbances

  • Impaired liver function as indicated by abnormally elevated liver enzymes (at least twice the upper limit of normal) for the local laboratory values

  • Severe, persistent right upper quadrant or epigastric pain that is unresponsive to medications and not accounted for by an alternative diagnosis, or both

  • Pulmonary edema

  • Thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100,000/µL)

  • Progressive renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >1.1 mg/dL) in absence of preexisting renal disease

It is important to note that the amount of proteinuria, presence of oliguria, and presence of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) or fetal growth restriction (FGR) by ultrasound have been removed as criteria for the diagnosis of severe disease.

Eclampsia is defined as the occurrence of seizures after the second half of pregnancy not attributable to other causes .

Chronic Hypertension

Chronic hypertension is defined as hypertension present prior to pregnancy or that is diagnosed before 20 weeks of gestation. Hypertension that persists for more than 3 months postpartum is also classified as chronic hypertension.

Chronic Hypertension With Superimposed Preeclampsia

Women with chronic hypertension may develop superimposed PE, which increases morbidity for both the mother and fetus. The diagnosis of superimposed PE is based on one or both of the following findings: development of new-onset proteinuria, defined as the urinary excretion of 0.3 g or more of protein in a 24-hour specimen or a P/C ratio greater than 0.3 in women with hypertension and no proteinuria before 20 weeks’ gestation; or, in women with hypertension and proteinuria before 20 weeks, severe exacerbation in hypertension plus development of new onset of symptoms or thrombocytopenia or abnormal liver enzymes ( Table 38.2 ).

TABLE 38.2
Recommended Criteria to Diagnose Preeclampsia in Women With Preexisting Medical Conditions
Condition Criteria Needed
Hypertension only Proteinuria of ≥300 mg per 24 h or thrombocytopenia
Hypertension plus proteinuria (renal disease or class F diabetes) Worsening severe hypertension plus proteinuria and either new onset of symptoms, thrombocytopenia, or elevated liver enzymes

The ACOG Task Force report on hypertension in pregnancy and the most recent ACOG Practice Bulletin on chronic hypertension recommended that superimposed PE be stratified into two groups to guide management: (1) superimposed PE, defined as a sudden increase in BP that was previously well controlled or escalation of antihypertensive medications to control BP, or (2) new-onset proteinuria (>300 mg/24-hour collection or a P/C ratio >0.3), or a sudden and sustained increase in proteinuria in a woman with known proteinuria before conception or early in pregnancy. It is important to emphasize that the criteria listed for change in BP or proteinuria are vague and subjective. Therefore clinical judgment is important when using these criteria to diagnose superimposed PE.

A diagnosis of superimposed PE with severe features is made in the presence of any of the following: (1) severe-range BP 160 mm Hg systolic or ≥110 mm Hg diastolic) despite escalation of antihypertensive therapy; (2) persistent cerebral symptoms such as headaches or visual disturbances; (3) significant increase in liver enzymes (at least two times the upper limit of normal concentration for a particular laboratory); (4) thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100,000/µL); or (5) new-onset and/or worsening renal insufficiency.

Gestational Hypertension

GH is the most frequent cause of hypertension during pregnancy. The incidence ranges between 6% and 29% in nulliparous women and between 2% and 4% in multiparous women. The incidence is markedly increased in patients with multiple gestations. In general, most cases of GH develop at or beyond 37 weeks’ gestation, and thus the overall pregnancy outcome is usually similar to that seen in women with normotensive pregnancies ( Table 38.3 ). However, women with mild GH have higher rates of induction of labor and progression to PE.

TABLE 38.3
Pregnancy Outcome in Women With Mild Gestational Hypertension
Modified from Sibai BM. Diagnosis and management of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:181–192.
Knuist et al.
( n = 396)
Hauth et al.
( n = 715)
Barton et al.
( n = 405)
Sibai
( n = 186)
Gestation at delivery (week) a NR 39.7 37.4 b 39.1
Before 37 weeks (%) 5.3 7.0 17.3 5.9
Before 34 weeks (%) 1.3 1.0 4.9 1.6
Birthweight (g) a NR 3303 3038 3217
SGA (%) 1.5 c 6.9 13.8 7.0
<2500 g (%) 7.1 7.7 23.5 NR
Abruptio placentae (%) 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.5
Perinatal deaths (%) 0.8 0.5 0 0
NR, Not reported; SGA, small for gestational age.

a Mean values.

b Women who developed hypertension at 24–35 weeks.

c Less than the third percentile.

Severe Gestational Hypertension

It is important to note that the new Task Force Report did not include severe GH as one of the classifications. Severe GH is defined as systolic BP of at least 160 or diastolic BP of at least 110 mm Hg on at least two occasions at least 4 hours apart or only once if acute antihypertensive medications are given prior to 4 hours. In addition, there should be absent proteinuria, absent maternal symptoms, and normal platelet count, serum creatinine, and liver enzymes. Maternal and perinatal morbidities are substantially increased in women with severe GH. Indeed, these women have increased risk for morbidity compared with women with mild PE. The rates of abruptio placentae, preterm delivery (at <37 and <35 weeks), and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants in these women can be similar to those seen in women with PE and severe features. It remains unclear whether this increase in preterm delivery is secondary to scheduled early delivery according to physician preference or whether it occurs because of a disease process.

I suggest that all women with severe GH should be hospitalized and initially treated as having PE with severe features. These women should be given IV antihypertensive therapy and monitored for presence of symptoms or abnormal laboratory findings. Subsequent management will depend on initial response to therapy, BP values after treatment, gestational age, and laboratory findings. Some of these women who have only mild hypertension or remain normotensive after the initial therapy can be managed as PE without severe features with delivery at or before 37 weeks.

Preeclampsia

PE is a form of hypertension that is unique to human pregnancy. The clinical findings of PE can manifest as either a maternal syndrome ( Fig. 38.2 ) or a fetal syndrome ( Fig. 38.3 ). In practice, the maternal syndrome of PE represents a clinical spectrum with major differences between near-term PE without demonstrable fetal effects and PE that is associated with low birthweight and preterm delivery. PE is clearly a heterogeneous condition for which the pathogenesis may be different in women with various risk factors. The pathogenesis of PE in nulliparous women may be different than that in women with preexisting vascular disease, multifetal gestations, diabetes mellitus, or previous PE. In addition, the pathophysiologic abnormalities in the placenta of early-onset PE may be different than that of PE that develops at term, during labor, or in the postpartum period.

Fig. 38.2, Maternal Manifestations in Preeclampsia.

Fig. 38.3, Fetal Manifestations of Preeclampsia.

The incidence of PE ranges between 2% and 7% in healthy nulliparous women. In these women, PE is generally nonsevere, with the onset near term or during labor (75% of cases), and the condition conveys only a minimally increased risk for adverse fetal outcome. However, these pregnancies can be associated with serious maternal complications such as eclampsia or pulmonary edema. In contrast, the incidence and severity of PE are substantially higher in women with multifetal gestation, chronic hypertension, previous PE, pregestational diabetes mellitus, or preexisting thrombophilias.

Atypical Preeclampsia

The criteria for atypical PE include gestational proteinuria or FGR plus one or more of the following symptoms of PE: hemolysis, thrombocytopenia, elevated liver enzymes, early signs and symptoms of PE-eclampsia earlier than 20 weeks, and late postpartum PE-eclampsia (>48 hours postpartum).

Capillary Leak Syndrome: Facial Edema, Ascites and Pulmonary Edema, and Gestational Proteinuria

Hypertension is considered to be the hallmark for the diagnosis of PE. However, in some patients with PE, the disease may manifest as either a capillary leak (proteinuria, facial and vulvar edema, ascites, pulmonary edema); excessive weight gain, particularly during the second and early third trimester; or a spectrum of abnormal hemostasis with multiple-organ dysfunction. These women usually present with clinical manifestations of atypical PE, such as proteinuria with or without facial edema, vulvar edema ( Fig. 38.4 ), excessive weight gain (>4 lb/wk), ascites, or pulmonary edema in association with abnormalities in laboratory values or presence of symptoms but without hypertension. Therefore we recommend that women with capillary leak syndrome with or without hypertension be evaluated for platelet, liver enzyme, and renal abnormalities. Those with symptoms such as new onset of unrelenting severe headache, severe visual disturbances, or abnormal blood tests should be considered to have possible PE.

Fig. 38.4, Vulvar Edema in Severe Preeclampsia.

Gestational Proteinuria

It is generally agreed that urine dipstick protein measurements should be performed at each prenatal visit after 20 weeks’ gestation. Gestational proteinuria is defined as urinary protein excretion of at least 300 mg per 24-hour timed collection, P/C ratio greater than 0.3, or persistent proteinuria (≥1+ on dipstick on at least two occasions at least 4 hours apart). In addition, new-onset proteinuria greater than 2+ on one occasion is strongly associated with proteinuria of greater than 300 mg in 24 hours. The exact incidence of gestational proteinuria progressing to PE is unknown; however, isolated gestational proteinuria was identified in 4% of women enrolled in two multicenter trials. In addition, these studies reported that 4.3% to 7% of patients had combined GH and gestational proteinuria. Thus it appears that at least one-third of women with gestational proteinuria may progress to PE. Indeed, some authors have suggested that gestational proteinuria alone may herald the early manifestations of impending PE. In the absence of other pathology, the patient should be treated as having possible PE and requires evaluation for the presence of symptoms; evaluation may include blood tests and frequent monitoring of BP (at least twice per week or, alternatively, ambulatory home BP measurements), and the patient should be educated about the signs and symptoms of PE. In addition, women in whom convulsions develop in association with hypertension and proteinuria during the first half of pregnancy should be considered to have eclampsia until proven otherwise. These women should undergo ultrasound examination of the uterus to rule out molar pregnancy or hydropic/cystic degeneration of the placenta.

Risk Factors for Preeclampsia

Several factors have been identified with increased risk for PE ( Box 38.2 ). In general, PE is considered a disease of primigravid women. The risk increases in those who have limited sperm exposure with the same partner before conception. The protective effects of long-term sperm exposure with the same partner might provide an explanation for the high risk for PE in women younger than 20 years old. A previous abortion (spontaneous or induced) or a previous normal pregnancy with the same partner is associated with a lower risk for PE. However, this protective effect is lost with a change of partner or with prolonged interval between pregnancies. In addition, both Scandinavian and US studies have confirmed the importance of paternal factors as a contributor to PE as well as an interpregnancy interval greater than 7 years.

Box 38.2
Risk Factors for Preeclampsia

  • Nulliparity

  • Age >40 years

  • Pregnancy with assisted reproduction

  • Interpregnancy interval >7 years

  • Family history of preeclampsia

  • Woman born small for gestational age

  • Obesity/gestational diabetes mellitus

  • Multifetal gestation

  • Preeclampsia in previous pregnancy

  • Poor outcome in previous pregnancy

  • Fetal growth restriction, placental abruption, fetal death

  • Preexisting medical-genetic conditions

  • Chronic hypertension

  • Renal disease

  • Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus

  • Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome

  • Factor V Leiden mutation

Pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology have been associated with an increased risk for PE. Among the factors cited are a greater proportion of women older than 40 years, infertile women during their first gestation, multifetal gestation, obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome, and women who become pregnant with donated gametes or embryos. The use of donated gametes can influence the maternal-fetal immune interaction. In addition, infertile women with recurrent miscarriage are also reported to be at increased risk for PE.

Obesity reflected as increased body mass index (BMI) heightens the risk for PE. The worldwide increase in obesity is thus likely to lead to a rise in the frequency of PE. Obesity has a strong link to insulin resistance, which is also a risk factor for PE. The exact mechanism by which obesity or insulin resistance is associated with PE is not well understood.

Earlier studies found an overall higher rate of thrombophilia in women with PE compared with controls. Recently, a number of reports have failed to reproduce these findings. The disparity in results may reflect the heterogeneity of the women being studied. In the largest series of preeclamptic women with thrombophilia, women had increasing risk for very early onset, severe disease (delivery before 28 weeks) compared with those who did not have thrombophilia.

Pathophysiology

The etiology of PE remains unknown. Many theories have been suggested, but most of them have not withstood the test of time. Some of the theories still under consideration are listed in Box 38.3 .

Box 38.3
Theories Associated With the Etiology of Preeclampsia

  • Abnormal trophoblast invasion or poor implantation

  • Imbalance in angiogenesis

  • Coagulation abnormalities

  • Vascular endothelial damage

  • Cardiovascular maladaptation

  • Immunologic maladaptation

  • Genetic predisposition

  • Exaggerated inflammatory response

  • Increased oxidative stress

During normal pregnancy, impressive physiologic changes occur in the uteroplacental vasculature and in the cardiovascular system. These changes are most likely induced by the interaction of the fetal (parental) allograft with maternal tissue. The development of mutual immunologic tolerance in the first trimester is thought to lead to important morphologic and biochemical changes in the systemic and uteroplacental maternal circulation.

Uterine Vascular Changes

The human placenta receives its blood supply from numerous uteroplacental arteries that are developed by the action of migratory interstitial and endovascular trophoblasts into the walls of the spiral arterioles . This transforms the uteroplacental arterial bed into a low-resistance, low-pressure, high-flow system. The conversion of the spiral arterioles of the nonpregnant uterus into the uteroplacental arteries has been termed physiologic changes . In a normal pregnancy, these trophoblast-induced vascular changes extend all the way from the intervillous space to the origin of the spiral arterioles that represent the radial arteries in the inner one third of the myometrium. It is suggested that these vascular changes are effected in two stages, “the conversion of the decidual segments of the spiral arterioles by a wave of endovascular trophoblast migration in the first trimester and the myometrial segments by a subsequent wave in the second trimester.” This process is reportedly associated with extensive fibrinoid formation and degeneration of the muscular layer in the arterial wall. These vascular changes result in the conversion of about 100 to 150 spiral arterioles into distended, tortuous, and funnel-shaped vessels that communicate through multiple openings into the intervillous space.

In contrast, pregnancies complicated by PE or by FGR demonstrate inadequate maternal vascular response to placentation. In these pregnancies, the previously mentioned vascular changes are usually found only in the decidual segments of the uteroplacental arteries. Hence the myometrial segments of the spiral arterioles continue to exhibit their characteristic musculoelastic architecture, thereby leaving them responsive to hormonal influences. In additionally, the number of well-developed arterioles is smaller than that found in normotensive pregnancies.

It has been postulated that this defective vascular response to placentation is due to inhibition of the second wave of endovascular trophoblast migration that normally occurs from approximately 18 weeks’ gestation onward. These pathologic changes may have the effect of curtailing the increased blood supply required by the fetoplacental unit in the later stages of pregnancy and may correlate with the decreased uteroplacental blood flow seen in most cases of PE . Frusca and associates studied placental bed biopsy specimens obtained during cesarean delivery from normal pregnancies ( n = 14), preeclamptic pregnancies ( n = 24), and chronic hypertensive pregnancies only ( n = 5). Biopsy specimens from the preeclamptic group demonstrated abnormal vascular changes in every case, and 18 had acute atherosclerotic changes. In contrast, 13 of the 14 specimens from normotensive pregnancies had normal vascular physiologic changes. In addition, they found that the mean birthweight was significantly lower in the group with atherosclerosis than it was in the other group without such findings. It is important to note that these vascular changes may also be demonstrated in a significant proportion of normotensive pregnancies complicated by FGR. Meekins and associates demonstrated that endovascular trophoblast invasion is not an all-or-none phenomenon in normal and preeclamptic pregnancies. These authors observed that morphologic features found in one spiral artery may not be representative of all vessels in a placental bed.

Vascular Endothelial Activation and Inflammation

The mechanism by which placental ischemia leads to the clinical syndrome of PE is thought to be related to the production of placental factors that enter the maternal circulation and result in endothelial cell dysfunction. Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) is a protein produced by the placenta. It acts by binding to the receptor-binding domains of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and it also binds to placental-like growth factor (PLGF). Increased levels of this protein in the maternal circulation result in reduced levels of free VEGF and free PLGF, with resultant endothelial cell dysfunction.

Maternal serum and placental levels of sFlt-1 are increased in pregnancies complicated by PE values above seen during normal pregnancies. Maynard and coworkers demonstrated that soluble placenta-derived VEGF receptor (sFlt-1)—an antagonist of VEGF and PLGF—is unregulated in PE, which leads to increased systemic levels of sFlt-1 that fall after delivery. Increased circulating sFlt-1 in PE is associated with decreased circulating levels of free VEGF and PLGF and results in endothelial dysfunction. The magnitude of increase in sFlt levels correlates with disease severity, which lends further support to VEGF–soluble Flt balance and represents one of the final common pathophysiologic pathways.

First trimester PLGF levels are decreased in future preeclamptic pregnancies and in pregnancies complicated by FGR, whereas sFlt levels do not differ from controls. Again, these data are compatible with decidual angiogenic growth factors, in particular PLGF, as being essential for early placental development (PLGF is low in both FGR and PE), with a later involvement of sFlt as a fetal rescue signal steering the maternal response (i.e., the degree of maternal systemic hypertension). This hypothesis is supported by Levine and colleagues, who demonstrated that during the last 2 months of pregnancy in normotensive controls, the level of sFlt-1 increased and the level of PLGF decreased.

Levine and associates investigated urinary PLGF levels in pregnant women with and without PE and found that among normotensive pregnant women, urinary PLGF increased during the first two trimesters, peaked at 29 to 32 weeks, and decreased thereafter. Among women who ultimately developed PE, the pattern of urinary PLGF was similar, but levels were significantly reduced beginning at 25 to 28 weeks. Particularly large differences were seen among those who subsequently developed early-onset PE and in those who delivered SGA infants. A similar study suggested that urinary angiogenic factors can identify women with severe PE.

During the past decade, our understanding of the molecular basis for the pathophysiologic abnormalities in PE has reached an unprece­dented level. Clear appreciation currently exists for the role of cell adhesion molecules and angiogenic proteins and for activation of the inflammatory system in the pathogenesis of microvascular dysfunction in women with PE. Evidence also suggests an exaggerated inflammatory response (abnormal cytokine production and neutrophil activation) in women with the clinical findings of PE. However, this enhanced inflammatory response is absent before the development of PE.

Recent studies have confirmed increased levels of angiotensin II autoantibodies, increased exosomes production, and activation of the complement system in women with PE, suggesting an important role in the pathophysiology of this disorder. Endothelial dysfunction and inappropriate endothelial cell activation associated with alterations in nitric oxide levels in PE explains most typical clinical manifestations, including the increased endothelial cell permeability and increased platelet aggregation.

Genetics and Genetic Imprinting

According to the genetic conflict theory, fetal genes are selected to increase the transfer of nutrients to the fetus, whereas maternal genes are selected to limit transfer in excess of some optimal level. The phenomenon of genomic imprinting means that a similar conflict exists within fetal cells between genes that are maternally derived and those that are paternally derived. The conflict hypothesis suggests that placental factors (fetal genes) act to increase maternal BP, whereas maternal factors act to reduce BP. Endothelial cell dysfunction may have evolved as a fetal rescue strategy to increase nonplacental resistance when the uteroplacental blood supply is inadequate.

Nilsson and associates published a model that suggests a heritability estimate of 31% for PE and 20% for GH. It is unlikely that one major PE gene will be found because such a gene would be selected against through evolution, unless it also carried a major reproductive advantage. It is more likely that a rapidly growing number of susceptibility genes will be uncovered and that many of these will be found to interact with the maternal cardiovascular-hemostatic system or in the regulation of maternal inflammatory responses. These loci segregate with different populations, and it should be noted that these loci only explain a relatively small percentage of the overall cases of PE. In addition, although these linkage studies indicate maternal susceptibility, they do not exclude the additional involvement of fetal genes. Another important consideration regarding the genetics of PE is the confounding effect of the so-called fetal origins of adult disease hypothesis, which suggests that a hostile intrauterine environment for a female fetus would form the basis for the insulin resistance syndrome with its associated endothelial dysfunction and, as such, that it would lead to an increased risk for PE.

Epigenetic features and imprinting are also involved in the pathogenesis of PE. Further evidence of the role of imprinting was recently suggested by Oudejans and van Dijk and Nafee and associates.

Changes in Prostanoids

Several investigators have described levels of the various prostaglandins and their metabolites throughout pregnancy. They have measured the concentrations of these substances in plasma, serum, amniotic fluid, placental tissues, urine, and cord blood. The data have been inconsistent, which reflects differences in methodology. During pregnancy, prostanoid production increases in both maternal and fetoplacental tissues. Prostacyclin is produced by the vascular endothelium and in the renal cortex. It is a potent vasodilator and inhibitor of platelet aggregation. Thromboxane A 2 (TXA 2 ) is produced by the platelets and trophoblasts; it is a potent vasoconstrictor and platelet aggregator. Hence, these eicosanoids have opposite effects and play a major role in regulating vascular tone and vascular blood flow. An imbalance in prostanoid production or catabolism has been suggested as being responsible for the pathophysiologic changes in PE. However, the precise role by which prostaglandins are involved in the etiology of PE remains unclear.

Lipid Peroxide, Free Radicals, and Antioxidants

Evidence is accumulating that lipid peroxides and free radicals may be important in the pathogenesis of PE. Superoxide ions may be cytotoxic to the cell by changing the characteristics of the cellular membrane and producing membrane lipid peroxidation. Elevated plasma concentrations of free radical oxidation products precede the development of PE. In addition, some studies reported lower serum antioxidant activity in patients with PE than in those with normotensive pregnancies.

Much of the controversy about oxidative stress is related to the nonspecificity of the markers. A recent study by Moretti and associates measured oxidative stress “online” in exhaled breath (not subjective to in vitro artifacts) and confirmed greater oxidative stress in women with PE compared with nonpregnant controls and those who had uncomplicated pregnancies.

Diagnosis of Preeclampsia

PE is a clinical syndrome that embraces a wide spectrum of signs and symptoms that have been clinically observed to develop alone or in combination. Elevated BP is the traditional hallmark for diagnosis of the disease. The diagnosis of PE and the severity of the disease process are generally based on maternal BP. Many factors may influence the measurement of BP, including the accuracy of the equipment used, the size of the sphygmomanometer cuff, duration of the rest period before recording, posture of the patient, and the Korotkoff phase used (phase IV or phase V for diastolic BP measurement). It is recommended that all BP values be recorded with the woman in a sitting position for ambulatory patients or in a semireclining position for hospitalized patients. The right arm should be used consistently, and the arm should be in an approximately horizontal position at heart level. For diastolic BP measurements, both phases—muffling sound and disappearance sound—should be recorded. This is very important because the level measured at phase IV is approximately 5 to 10 mm Hg higher than that measured at phase V. A rise in BP has been used by several authors as a criterion for the diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy. This definition is usually unreliable because a gradual increase in BP from the second to third trimester is seen in most normotensive pregnancies. Villar and Sibai prospectively studied BP changes during the course of pregnancy in 700 young primigravidas and found that 137 patients (19.6%) had PE. The sensitivity and positive predictive values (PPVs) for PE of a threshold increase in diastolic BP of at least 15 mm Hg on two occasions were 39% and 32%, respectively. The respective values for a threshold increase in systolic pressures of at least 30 mm Hg were 22% and 33%.

Three recent studies from New Zealand, the United States, and Turkey investigated pregnancy outcomes in women with a rise in diastolic BP of more than 15 mm Hg but an absolute diastolic level less than 90 mm Hg compared with gravidas who remained normotensive. The New Zealand report and a Turkish study included women with elevated BPs without proteinuria, whereas the American investigation included women with an increased diastolic pressure by 15 mm Hg or more plus proteinuria (≥300 mg/24 h). Overall, pregnancy outcomes were similar among women who remained normotensive and those who demonstrated a rise in diastolic pressure of 15 mm Hg or higher but did not reach 90 mm Hg. The use of a specific rise in BP over baseline as a diagnostic criterion is principally influenced by two factors: gestational age at time of first observation and frequency of BP measurements. Thus a 15 mm Hg rise in diastolic BP or a 30 mm Hg rise in systolic pressure are unreliable to diagnose PE.

Prediction of Preeclampsia

A review of the world literature reveals that more than 100 clinical, biophysical, and biochemical tests have been recommended to predict or identify the patient at risk for future development of PE. The results of the pooled data for the various tests and the lack of agreement among serial tests suggest that none of these clinical tests is sufficiently reliable for use as a screening test in clinical practice.

Numerous biochemical markers have been proposed to predict which women are destined to develop PE. These biochemical markers were generally chosen on the basis of specific pathophysiologic abnormalities that have been reported in association with PE. Thus these markers have included markers of placental dysfunction, endothelial and coagulation activation, angiogenesis, and markers of systemic inflammation. However, the results of various studies to evaluate the reliability of these markers in predicting PE have been inconsistent, and many of these markers suffer from poor specificity and predictive values that are too low for routine use in clinical practice.

During the past decade, several prospective and nested case-control studies have found that certain maternal risk factors, biophysical clinical factors, and serum biomarkers obtained in the first trimester are associated with subsequent development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs), GH, or PE. These studies evaluated the use of these factors or markers alone or in combination, and they provided detection rates for various subtypes of hypertension and PE with a false-positive rate (FPR) of either 5% or 10%. Overall, neither the maternal factors nor the serum biomarkers, either alone or combined, had an adequate detection rate for either all HDPs or GH or PE developing at 37 weeks of gestation or later. In the same studies, using maternal factors and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in the first trimester, the detection rate for PE before 34 weeks was 73%, and for PE before 37 weeks, it was 60% with an FPR of 10%. Using data from the Fetal Medicine Foundation, the use of combined maternal factors and biophysical and biochemical markers increased the detection rate to 95% for PE that required delivery before 34 weeks of gestation and 77% for PE that required delivery at before 37 weeks of gestation with an FPR of 10%. However, the PPV for such a screen remained less than 10%. In addition, these studies were conducted in a heterogeneous group of women at various risks for HDPs and PE. It has been suggested that the performance of the FMF algorithm for predicting PE is superior to the risk factors proposed by ACOG. In contrast, a recent study by Giguère and colleagues evaluated combined maternal factors and serum markers measured in the first trimester in 7929 women who were at very low risk for GH (2.7%) and PE (1.8%). In those with PE, the incidence was 0.2% at less than 34 weeks and 1.2% at less than 37 weeks of gestation. They found that a clinical model that included maternal risk factors, BMI, and MAP had a detection rate of 54% and a PPV of 3% with an FPR of 10% for PE at less than 37 weeks of gestation, whereas a full model that also included serum biomarkers had a detection rate of 39% and a PPV of 2% for PE at less than 37 weeks of gestation. Similar studies revealed that the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm has lower sensitivity and PPV for PE when tested in US populations.

Based on the results of this study and other reports in recent years, it is clear that evaluation of maternal clinical factors and other biophysical and biomarkers measured in the first trimester is useful only for the prediction of those who will ultimately progress to PE that will require delivery prior to 34 weeks of gestation. However, given the poor PPV for PE before 34 weeks and the poor detection rates for all cases of GH and PE, the clinical indications for a PE screening test in the first trimester remain unclear. A major concern of screening for PE without evidence of benefit is the unintended consequences of those identified as at risk, particularly for a test with a very high FPR of cases with a very low PPV. Some authors and commercial entities have recommended that those who screen positive should have more frequent visits, more maternal and fetal testing, bedrest, and other interventions that could be potentially harmful to both mother and infant, especially when incorrectly labeled at risk by a test with a high FPR. In addition, even the most reliable predictive test will not have clinical utility unless effective preventative approaches and therapeutic interventions are available.

Currently, no prospective studies or randomized trials have evaluated the benefits and risks of first trimester screening for prediction of PE. Until then, the use of such tests for screening should remain investigational.

Doppler ultrasound is a useful method to assess uterine artery blood flow velocity in the second trimester. An abnormal uterine artery velocity waveform is characterized by a high resistance index or by the presence of an early diastolic notch (unilateral or bilateral). Pregnancies complicated by abnormal uterine artery Doppler findings in the second trimester are associated with more than a sixfold increase in the rate of PE . However, the sensitivity of an abnormal uterine artery Doppler for predicting PE ranges from 20% to 60% with a PPV of 6% to 40%. Current data do not support Doppler studies for routine screening of pregnant women for PE. The ACOG Task Force report on Hypertension in Pregnancy and the ACOG Practice Bulletin recommend only using risk factors for identifying women considered at increased risk for PE.

Prevention of Preeclampsia

Numerous clinical trials describe the use of various methods to prevent or reduce the incidence of PE. , Because the etiology of the disease is unknown, these interventions have been used in an attempt to correct theoretic abnormalities in PE. A detailed review of these trials is beyond the scope of this chapter; however, the results of these studies have been the subject of several recent systemic reviews. In short, randomized trials have evaluated protein or salt restriction; zinc, magnesium, fish oil, or vitamin C or E supplementation; the use of diuretics and other antihypertensive agents; and the use of heparin to prevent PE in women with various risk factors. These trials have had limited sample sizes, and results have revealed minimal to no benefit. Some of the methods studied are summarized in Box 38.4 .

Box 38.4
Interventions Used to Prevent Preeclampsia

  • High-protein and low-salt diet

  • Nutritional supplementation (protein)

  • Calcium

  • Magnesium

  • Zinc

  • Fish oil and evening primrose oil

  • Antihypertensive drugs, including diuretics

  • Antithrombotic agents

  • Low-dose aspirin

  • Dipyridamole

  • Heparin

  • Vitamins E and C

  • Sildenafil

Calcium Supplementation

The relationship between dietary calcium intake and hypertension has been the subject of several experimental and observational studies. Epidemiologic studies have documented an inverse association between calcium intake and maternal BP and the incidences of PE and eclampsia. The BP-lowering effect of calcium is thought to be mediated by alterations in plasma renin activity and parathyroid hormone.

Thirteen clinical studies (15,730 women) have compared the use of calcium with no treatment or with a placebo in pregnancy. These trials differ in the populations studied (low risk or high risk for HDPs), study design (randomization, double-blind, or use of a placebo), gestational age at enrollment (20 to 32 weeks’ gestation), sample size in each group (range, 22 to 588), dose of elemental calcium used (156 to 2000 mg/d), and the definition of HDPs used.

In the Cochrane review, calcium supplementation was associated with reduced hypertension (relative risk [RR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.81) and reduced PE (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.65), particularly for those at high risk and with low baseline dietary calcium intake; for those with adequate calcium intake, the difference was not statistically significant. No side effects of calcium supplementation have been recorded in the trials reviewed. In contrast, a recent evidence-based review by the US Food and Drug Administration concluded that “the relationship between calcium and risk of hypertension in pregnancy is inconsistent and inconclusive, and the relationship between calcium and the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and PE is highly unlikely.” At present, the benefit of calcium supplementation for PE prevention in women with low dietary calcium intake remains unclear . In addition, a recent multinational double-blind randomized trial revealed that prepregnancy and early pregnancy calcium supplementation among women at high risk for PE revealed no reduction in the rate of recurrent PE . Based on available data, the author does not recommend using calcium supplementation for the prevention of PE.

Antiplatelet Agents Including Low-Dose Aspirin

PE is associated with vasospasm and activation of the coagulation-hemostasis systems. Enhanced platelet activation plays a central role in the previously mentioned process and reflects abnormalities in the thromboxane-prostacyclin balance. Hence several authors have used pharmacologic manipulation to alter the previously mentioned ratio in an attempt to prevent or ameliorate the course of PE.

Aspirin inhibits the synthesis of prostaglandins by irreversibly acetylating and inactivating cyclooxygenase (COX). In vitro, platelet COX is more sensitive to inhibition by low doses of aspirin (<80 mg) than vascular endothelial COX. This biochemical selectivity of low-dose aspirin (LDA) appears to be related to its unusual kinetics, which result in presystemic acetylation of platelets exposed to higher concentrations of aspirin in the portal circulation.

Most randomized trials for the prevention of PE have used LDA (50 to 100 mg/dL). The rationale for recommending LDA prophylaxis is the theory that the vasospasm and coagulation abnormalities in PE are caused partly by an imbalance in the TXA 2 /prostacyclin ratio.

During the past three decades, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews evaluated the benefits and risks of using LDA in pregnancy for the prevention of PE and its complications in women with one or more of the risk factors listed previously. The results of the RCTs were conflicting, and the systematic reviews were inconclusive. This is not surprising given that the published trials and those included in various reviews differed in regard to the enrolled study populations (minimal risk to extremely high risk for PE, preterm birth, FGR, and perinatal death), gestational age at enrollment (12 to 32 weeks), dose of aspirin used (50 to 150 mg/d), number of study subjects and number of centers in each trial, definition of PE and adverse perinatal outcomes, and whether the systemic review included unplanned subgroup analysis.

The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recently published a report on LDA for the prevention of morbidity and mortality from PE. The report contained an exhaustive review of published trials regarding the efficacy and safety of LDA in pregnancy for the prevention of PE and other adverse perinatal outcomes in women considered at high risk for PE. The review considered 15 randomized trials (8 quality) in women at increased risk for PE to evaluate maternal and perinatal benefits and 13 randomized trials (8 quality) to evaluate the incidence of PE. PE incidence in women considered at increased risk ranged from 8% to 30%. In addition, two large observational studies were included to evaluate the safety of LDA use in pregnancy.

In women considered at increased risk for PE, the USPSTF members found that LDA administered after 12 weeks’ gestation reduced the risk of PE by an average of 24% (pooled relative risk [PRR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.95), reduced the average risk of preterm birth by 14% (PRR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.98), and reduced the risk of FGR by 20% (PRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.99). In addition, they found that the magnitude of risk reduction with LDA for the aforementioned complications was dependent on baseline risk for PE in the study population. Contrary to the results of other systematic reviews, they found that the beneficial effects of LDA were not dependent on the dose of LDA, and they were evident when LDA was used between 12 and 28 weeks’ gestation. Moreover, they found that LDA did not increase the risk of bleeding complications (abruptio placentae, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal intracerebral hemorrhage) or perinatal death. Based on results of this review, the Task Force members recommended that women considered at increased risk for PE—that is, those with a history of PE, preexisting chronic hypertension or renal disease, pregestational diabetes, autoimmune disease, multifetal gestation, or those with more than 1 moderate risk factors such as nulliparity, obesity—should receive LDA (81 mg/d) starting at 12 to 28 weeks until delivery to reduce the likelihood of developing subsequent PE, preterm birth, or FGR. This recommendation has also been adopted by

Recently, the Perinatal Antiplatelet Review of International Studies collaborative group performed an individual patient data meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of antiplatelet agents, predominantly aspirin, for the prevention of PE . Thirty-one trials that involved 32,217 women are included in this review, and a 10% reduction was seen in the risk for PE associated with the use of antiplatelet agents (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.96). For women with a previous history of hypertension or PE ( n = 6107) who were assigned to antiplatelet agents, the RR for developing PE was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97). No significant differences were found between treatment and control groups in any other measures of outcome. The reviewers concluded that antiplatelet agents, largely LDA, have small to moderate benefits when used for prevention of PE. In an updated individual patient data meta-analysis, they found no difference in benefit between an aspirin dose of less than 75 mg or greater than 75 mg/d and no difference whether LDA was started at less than 16 weeks or at 16 weeks’ gestation or later. In contrast, a recent multicenter, international (ASPRE) trial used a clinical plus a biomarker screening test to identify those considered at risk for PE at less than 37 weeks. Women were screened in the first trimester and subsequently randomized to either aspirin 150 mg/d ( n = 798) or a placebo ( n = 822). The authors reported a significant reduction in rate of PE leading to delivery at less than 37 weeks (1.6 % in LDA vs. 4.3% placebo, OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.74); however, the overall rate of total PE (8.3% vs. 11.4%) and HDPs (18.35 vs. 19.8%) were similar between groups. Based on these findings, the authors recommended that a screening test recommended by the Fetal Medicine Foundation be used in all pregnant women in first trimester and those who screen positive be prescribed 150 mg of aspirin daily until 34 weeks of gestation. However, it is my opinion that such approach is not clinically useful because it requires screening a large number of women to prevent one case of PE at less than 37 weeks, and it will miss most pregnant women who will ultimately develop PE or other hypertensive disorders. Such approach will create anxiety to many women because of the high false-positive test results, and it might give a false sense of security to providers leading to missed or delayed diagnosis of gestational hypertension or PE that may lead to serious maternal and perinatal morbidities.

LDA was found to be safe in most studies and reviews. However, despite more than 40 years of research on the subject, more than 64 randomized trials, and more than 30 systemic reviews and meta-analyses, there is still uncertainty regarding who is a candidate for LDA, dose to be used, when to start, and when to stop during gestation.

Heparin or Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin

Several observational studies and randomized trials have evaluated the prophylactic use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for the prevention of PE and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. The results of these studies were the subject of several recent reviews. Two recent large randomized trials conducted in Italy and in Canada revealed that prophylactic LMWH does not reduce the rate of PE in women at high risk for this complication. In addition, a meta-analysis of published trials demonstrated no benefit from LMWH. Therefore it is the authors’ opinion that LMWH should not be used for PE prevention.

Vitamins C and E

Reduced antioxidant capacity, increased oxidative stress, or both in the maternal circulation and in the placenta have been proposed to play a major role in the pathogenesis of PE. Consequently, several trials were designed using vitamins C and E for the prevention of PE. The first trial suggested a beneficial effect from pharmacologic doses of vitamins E and C in women identified as being at risk for PE by means of abnormal uterine Doppler flow velocimetry. However, the study had limited sample size and must be confirmed in other populations. In contrast, several randomized trials with large sample sizes in women at low risk and very high risk for PE found no reduction in the rate of PE with vitamin C and E supplementation ( Table 38.4 ).

TABLE 38.4
Multicenter Trials of Vitamins C and E for the Prevention of Preeclampsia
Study Group Women Enrollment Gestational Age (Weeks) PREECLAMPSIA
Vitamins C and E (%) Placebo (%)
ACTS Nulliparas 14–22 56/935 (6) 47/942 (5)
VIP High risk 14–22 181/1196 (15) 187/1199 (16)
Global Network High risk 12–20 49/355 (14) 55/352 (16)
WHO High risk 14–22 164/681 (24) 157/674 (23)
NICHD Nulliparas 9–16 358/4993 (7.2) 332/4976 (6.7)
INTAPP High risk 12–18 69/1167 (6) 68/1196 (5.7)
DAPIT Pregestational diabetes 8–22 57/375 (15) 70/3784 (19)
DAPIT, Diabetes and Preeclampsia Intervention Trial; INTAPP, International Trial of Antioxidants in the Prevention of Preeclampsia; NICHD, National Institute of Child Health and Development; VIP, Vitamins in Pregnancy; WHO, World Health Organization.

Metformin and Pravastatin

Because obesity and insulin resistance are known to be risk factors for GH and PE, some randomized trials evaluated oral metformin versus placebo for prevention of PE. Results of these studies are described in Table 38.5 . In addition, a large multicenter randomized trial is in process to start evaluating the use of metformin 2000 mg/d versus placebo for the prevention of PE. Some investigators found that pravastatin prevents PE manifestations in an animal model for PE, and a small randomized trial found that pravastatin 20 mg/ prevents recurrent PE. As a result, a multicenter randomized trial is underway to determine whether pravastatin dose of 20 mg/d started prior to 14 weeks reduces rate of recurrent PE.

TABLE 38.5
Low-Dose Aspirin in High-Risk Women: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Trial
Data from Caritis SN, Sibai BM, Hauth J, et al. Low-dose aspirin therapy to prevent preeclampsia in women at high risk. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(11):701–705.
PREECLAMPSIA (%)
Entry Criteria N Aspirin a Placebo a
Normotensive and no proteinuria 1613 14.5 17.7
Proteinuria and hypertension 119 31.7 22.0
Proteinuria only 48 25.0 33.3
Hypertension only 723 24.8 25.0
Insulin-dependent diabetes 462 18.3 21.6
Chronic hypertension 763 26.0 24.6
Multifetal gestation 678 11.5 15.9
Previous preeclampsia 600 16.7 19.0

a No difference was reported for any of the groups regarding the rate of preeclampsia.

Folic Acid Supplementation

Wen and associates conducted an international multicenter randomized trial comparing the use of 4 mg folic versus a placebo daily in 2464 pregnant women with either chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, prior PE, twins, or BMI greater than 35. Eligible women were randomized from 8 weeks of gestation to the end of week 16 of gestation until delivery. The primary outcome was PE. PE occurred in 169/1144 (14.8%) women in the folic acid group and 156/1157 (13.5%) in the placebo group (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.34; P = .37). There was no evidence of differences between the groups for any other adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes.

Laboratory Abnormalities in Preeclampsia

Women with PE may exhibit a symptom complex that ranges from minimal BP elevation to derangements of multiple organ systems. The renal, hematologic, and hepatic systems are most likely to be involved.

Renal Function

Renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) increase during normal pregnancy. These changes are responsible for a fall in serum creatinine, urea, and uric acid concentrations. In PE, vasospasm and glomerular capillary endothelial swelling (glomerular endotheliosis) lead to an average reduction in GFR of 25% less than the rate for normal pregnancy. Serum creatinine is rarely elevated in PE, but uric acid can be increased. In a study of 95 women with severe PE, Sibai and associates reported a mean serum creatinine of 0.91 mg/dL, a mean uric acid of 6.6 mg/dL, and a mean creatinine clearance of 100 mL/min.

The clinical significance of elevated uric acid levels in PE-eclampsia has been confusing. Hyperuricemia is associated with renal dysfunction, especially decreased renal tubular secretion, and has been consistently associated with glomerular endotheliosis. In addition, it has been linked with increased oxidative stress in PE. Despite the fact that uric acid levels are elevated in women with PE, this test is not sensitive or specific for the diagnosis of PE or for predicting adverse perinatal outcome.

Hepatic Function

The liver is not primarily involved in PE, and hepatic involvement is observed in only 10% of women with severe PE. Fibrin deposition has been found along the walls of hepatic sinusoids in preeclamptic patients with no laboratory or histologic evidence of liver involvement. When liver dysfunction does occur in PE, mild elevation of serum transaminases is most common. Bilirubin is rarely increased in PE, but when elevated, the indirect fraction predominates. Elevated liver enzymes are a feature of the hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome, a variant of severe PE.

Hematologic Changes

Many studies have evaluated the hematologic abnormalities in women with PE. Plasma fibrinopeptide A, D-dimer levels, and circulating thrombin-antithrombin complexes are higher in women with PE than in normotensive gravidas. In contrast, plasma antithrombin III activity is decreased. These findings indicate enhanced thrombin generation.

Plasma fibrinogen rises progressively during normal pregnancy. In general, plasma fibrinogen levels are rarely reduced in women with PE in the absence of placental abruption. However, they can be reduced in patient with PE, elevated serum creatinine, and abnormal liver function. They will also be reduced in cases of acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP) mimicking severe PE.

Thrombocytopenia is the most common hematologic abnormality in women with severe PE. It is correlated with the severity of the disease process and the presence or absence of placental abruption. In a study of 1414 women with hypertension during pregnancy, Burrows and Kelton found a platelet count of less than 150,000/mm 3 in 15% of cases.

Leduc and associates studied the coagulation profile—the platelet count, fibrinogen, prothrombin time (PT), and partial thromboplastin time (PTT)—in 100 consecutive women with severe PE. A platelet count lower than 150,000/mm 3 was found in 50% of the women, and a count lower than 100,000/mm 3 was found in 36%. Thirteen women had a fibrinogen level of less than 300 mg/dL, and two had prolonged PT and PTT as well as thrombocytopenia on admission. These researchers found the admission platelet count to be an excellent predictor of subsequent thrombocytopenia and concluded that fibrinogen levels, PT, and PTT should be obtained only in women with a platelet count of less than 100,000/mm 3 . A recent study by Barron confirmed these observations in more than 800 women with hypertension in pregnancy.

Hemolysis, Elevated Liver Enzymes, and Low Platelets Syndrome

Considerable debate surrounds the definition, diagnosis, incidence, etiology, and management of HELLP syndrome. Patients with such findings were previously described by many investigators. Weinstein considered it a unique variant of PE and coined the term HELLP syndrome for this entity. Barton and associates performed liver biopsies in patients with PE and HELLP syndrome, and periportal necrosis and hemorrhage were the most common histopathologic findings. In addition, they found that the extent of the laboratory abnormalities in HELLP syndrome, including the platelet count and liver enzymes, did not correlate with hepatic histopathologic findings.

Laboratory Criteria for Diagnosis

Various diagnostic criteria have been used for HELLP. Hemolysis, defined as the presence of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, is the hallmark of the triad of HELLP syndrome. The classic findings of microangiopathic hemolysis include an abnormal peripheral smear (schistocytes, burr cells, echinocytes), elevated serum bilirubin (indirect form), low serum haptoglobin levels, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and a significant drop in hemoglobin levels. A significant percentage of published reports included patients who had no evidence of hemolysis; hence these patients will not fit the criteria for HELLP syndrome. In some studies in which hemolysis is described, the diagnosis is suspect because it has been based on the presence of an abnormal peripheral smear (no description of type or degree of abnormalities) or elevated LDH levels (threshold of 180 to 600 U/L).

No consensus exists in the literature regarding the liver function test to be used or the degree of elevation in these tests to diagnose elevated liver enzymes. In his original report, Weinstein mentioned abnormal serum levels of aspartate transaminase (AST), abnormal alanine transaminase (ALT), and abnormal bilirubin values; however, specific levels were not suggested. In subsequent studies in which elevated liver enzymes were described, either AST or ALT, the values considered to be abnormal ranged from 17 to 72 U/L. In clinical practice, many of these values are considered normal or slightly elevated.

Low platelet count is the third abnormality required to establish the diagnosis of HELLP syndrome; no consensus has been reached among various published reports regarding the diagnosis of thrombocytopenia. The reported cutoff values have ranged from 75,000/mm 3 to 279,000/mm 3 , and a level of less than 100,000/mm 3 is most often cited.

Many authors have used elevated total LDH (usually >600 U/L) as diagnostic criteria for hemolysis. Of the five isoforms of LDH, only two of them—LDH 1 and LDH 2 —are released from ruptured red blood cells. In most women with severe PE-eclampsia, the elevation in total LDH is probably caused mostly by liver ischemia. Therefore many authors advocate that elevated bilirubin values (indirect form), abnormal peripheral smear, or a low serum haptoglobin level should be part of the diagnostic criteria for hemolysis.

Based on a retrospective review of 302 cases of HELLP syndrome, Martin and colleagues devised the following classification based on the nadir of the platelet count. Class 1 HELLP syndrome was defined as a platelet nadir less than 50,000/mm 3 , class 2 as a platelet nadir between 50,000 and 100,000/mm 3 , and class 3 as a platelet nadir between 100,000 and 150,000/mm 3 . These classes have been used to predict the rapidity of recovery postpartum, maternal-perinatal outcome, and the need for plasmapheresis.

Hemolysis, defined as the presence of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, is the hallmark of HELLP syndrome. The role of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in PE is controversial. Most authors do not regard HELLP syndrome to be a variant of DIC because coagulation parameters such as PT, PTT, and serum fibrinogen are normal. However, the diagnosis of DIC can be difficult to establish in clinical practice. When sensitive determinants of this condition are used—such as antithrombin III, fibrinopeptide A, fibrin monomer, D dimer, α 2 -antiplasmin, plasminogen, prekallikrein, and fibronectin—many patients have laboratory values consistent with DIC. Unfortunately, these tests are time consuming and are not suitable for routine monitoring. Consequently, less sensitive parameters are often used. Sibai and associates defined DIC as the presence of thrombocytopenia, low fibrinogen levels (plasma fibrinogen <300 mg/dL), and fibrin split products greater than 40 mg/mL. These authors noted the presence of coagulopathy in 21% of 442 patients with HELLP syndrome. They also found that most cases occurred in women who had antecedent placental abruption or peripartum hemorrhage, and it occurred in all four women in their study who had subcapsular liver hematomas. In the absence of these complications, the frequency of DIC was only 5%.

In view of the previously mentioned diagnostic problems, we recommended that uniform and standardized laboratory values be used to diagnose HELLP syndrome. Plasma haptoglobin and bilirubin values should be included in the diagnosis of hemolysis. In addition, the degree of abnormality of liver enzymes should be defined as a certain number of standard deviations from the normal value for each hospital population. Our laboratory criteria to establish the diagnosis are presented in Box 38.5 .

Box 38.5
Criteria to Establish the Diagnosis of HELLP Syndrome

  • Hemolysis (at least two of these):

    • Peripheral smear (schistocytes, burr cells)

    • Serum bilirubin (≥1.2 mg/dL)

    • Low serum haptoglobin

  • Severe anemia unrelated to blood loss

  • Elevated liver enzymes

    • Aspartate transaminase or alanine transaminase at least twice the ULN

    • Lactate dehydrogenase twice or more of the ULN

  • Low platelets (<100,000/mm 3 )

HELLP, Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets; ULN, upper limit of normal.

Clinical Findings

The reported incidence of HELLP syndrome in PE has been variable, which reflects the differences in diagnostic criteria. The syndrome appears to be more common in white women and is also more common in preeclamptic women who have been managed conservatively.

Early detection of HELLP syndrome can be a challenge in that many women present with nonspecific symptoms or subtle signs of PE. The various signs and symptoms reported are not diagnostic of PE and may also be found in women with severe PE-eclampsia without HELLP syndrome. Right upper quadrant or epigastric pain and nausea or vomiting have been reported with a frequency ranging from 30% to 90% ( Table 38.6 ). Most women gave a history of malaise typical of a nonspecific viral-like syndrome for several days before presentation, which led one investigator to suggest performing laboratory investigations (complete blood count [CBC] and liver enzymes) in all pregnant women with suspected PE who have these symptoms during the third trimester. Headaches are reported by 33% to 61% of the patients, whereas visual changes are reported in approximately 17%. A small subset of patients with HELLP syndrome may present with symptoms related to thrombocytopenia, such as bleeding from mucosal surfaces, hematuria, petechial hemorrhages, or ecchymosis.

TABLE 38.6
Signs and Symptoms in Women With HELLP Syndrome
Modified from Sibai BM. Diagnosis, controversies, and management of HELLP syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(5):981–991.
Weinstein
( n = 57) (%)
Sibai et al.
( n = 509) (%)
Martin et al.
( n = 501) (%)
Rath et al.
( n = 50) (%)
Right upper quadrant epigastric pain 86 63 40 90
Nausea, vomiting 84 36 29 52
Headache NR 33 61 NR
Hypertension NR 85 82 88
Proteinuria 96 87 86 100
HELLP, Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets; NR, not reported.

Although most patients have hypertension (82% to 88%; see Table 38.6 ), it may be only mild in 15% to 50% of the cases and absent in 12% to 18%. Most of the patients (86% to 100%) have proteinuria by dipstick examination, although it has been reported to be absent in 13% of cases.

Differential Diagnosis

The presenting symptoms, clinical findings, and many of the laboratory findings in women with HELLP syndrome overlap with a number of medical syndromes, surgical conditions, and obstetric complications; therefore the differential diagnosis of HELLP syndrome should include any of the conditions listed in Box 38.6 . Because some women with HELLP syndrome may present with gastrointestinal, respiratory, or hematologic symptoms in association with elevated liver enzymes or low platelets in the absence of hypertension or proteinuria, many initially are misdiagnosed as having other conditions such as upper respiratory infection, hepatitis, cholecystitis, pancreatitis, AFLP, or immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Conversely, some women with other conditions, such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), systemic lupus erythematosus, sepsis, or catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, may be erroneously diagnosed as having HELLP syndrome. In addition, PE may occasionally be superimposed on one of these disorders, which further contributes to the diagnostic difficulty. Because of the remarkably similar clinical and laboratory findings of these disease processes, even the most experienced clinician can face a difficult diagnostic challenge. Therefore efforts should be made to attempt to identify an accurate diagnosis, given that management strategies may be different among these conditions. It is important to emphasize that affected women may have a variety of unusual signs and symptoms, none of which are diagnostic of severe PE. Pregnant women with probable PE who present with atypical symptoms should have a CBC, a platelet count, and liver enzyme determinations irrespective of maternal BP findings.

Box 38.6
Medical and Surgical Disorders Often Confused With HELLP Syndrome

  • Acute fatty liver of pregnancy

  • Appendicitis

  • Gallbladder disease

  • Glomerulonephritis

  • Hemolytic uremic syndrome

  • Hepatic encephalopathy

  • Hyperemesis gravidarum

  • Idiopathic thrombocytopenia

  • Pyelonephritis

  • Systemic lupus erythematosus

  • Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome

  • Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

  • Viral hepatitis

HELLP, Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets.

Occasionally, the presence of this syndrome is associated with hypoglycemia that leads to coma, severe hyponatremia, and cortical blindness. A rare but interesting complication of HELLP syndrome is transient nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Unlike central diabetes insipidus, which results from the diminished or absent secretion of arginine vasopressin by the hypothalamus, transient nephrogenic diabetes insipidus is characterized by a resistance to arginine vasopressin mediated by excessive vasopressinase. It is postulated that elevated circulating vasopressinase may result from impaired hepatic metabolism of the enzyme.

Management of HELLP Syndrome

Management of preeclamptic women who present with HELLP syndrome is highly controversial. Consequently, several therapeutic modalities have been described in the literature to treat or reverse HELLP syndrome. Most of these modalities are similar to those used in the management of severe PE remote from term ( Box 38.7 ).

Box 38.7
Modified from Sibai BM. The HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets): much ado about nothing? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162(2):311–316.
Therapeutic Modalities Used to Treat or Reverse HELLP Syndrome

  • Plasma volume expansion

    • Bedrest

    • Crystalloids

    • Albumin 5%–25%

  • Antithrombotic agents

    • Low-dose aspirin

    • Dipyridamole

    • Heparin

    • Antithrombin III

  • Immunosuppressive agents

    • Steroids

  • Miscellaneous

    • Fresh-frozen plasma infusions

    • Exchange plasmapheresis

    • Dialysis

HELLP, Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets.

The clinical course of women with true HELLP syndrome is usually characterized by progressive and sometimes sudden deterioration in the maternal condition. Because the presence of this syndrome has been associated with increased rates of maternal morbidity and mortality, many authors consider its presence to be an indication for immediate delivery. There is also a consensus of opinion that prompt delivery is indicated if the syndrome develops beyond 34 weeks’ gestation or earlier if obvious multiorgan dysfunction, DIC, liver infarction or hemorrhage, renal failure, suspected abruption, or nonreassuring fetal status are apparent. Delivery is also indicated if the syndrome develops before 23 weeks’ gestation.

On the other hand, considerable disagreement exists about the management of women with HELLP syndrome at or before 34 weeks of gestation when the maternal condition is stable, except for mild to moderate abnormalities in blood tests, and fetal condition is reassuring. In such patients, some authors recommend the administration of corticosteroids to accelerate fetal lung maturity followed by delivery after 24 hours, whereas others recommend prolonging pregnancy until the development of maternal or fetal indications for delivery or until achievement of fetal lung maturity. Some of the measures used in these latter cases have included one or more of the following: bedrest, antihypertensive agents, antithrombotic agents (LDA, dipy­ridamole), plasma volume expanders (crystalloids, albumin, fresh frozen plasma), and corticosteroids (prednisone, prednisolone, dexamethasone, or betamethasone).

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here