Paraneoplastic Neurologic Disorders


Paraneoplastic neurologic disorders are seen when antitumor immunologic responses, primarily antibodies, directed against antigens expressed in the cancer, attack neural cells (neurons or glia) also expressing these antigens. Based on the neurologic presentation and the antibody profile, there are numerous well-defined paraneoplastic syndromes such as limbic encephalitis with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and seropositivity for ANNA-1 (anti–neuronal nuclear antibody type-1 [Hu]); stiff person syndrome with breast cancer and amphiphysin–immunoglobulin (Ig) G); Lambert-Eaton syndrome with SCLC and P/Q-type voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC) antibodies. Early recognition of these disorders is of paramount importance due to the need to begin appropriate treatment before there is irreversible neurologic injury.

Epidemiology

Overall, paraneoplastic neurologic disorders are rare; they are present in up to 0.01% of the cancer patients; exceptions exist, for example myasthenia gravis (MG) is seen in 30%–40% of patients with thymoma. The commonest cancers associated with paraneoplastic neurologic disorder include SCLC, adenocarcinoma of the breast and ovary, and thymoma.

Pathogenesis

Paraneoplastic autoimmunity is initiated by onconeural proteins expressed in the plasma membrane, cytoplasm, nucleus, or nucleolus of certain tumor cells; neural cell populations are coincidental targets. Depending on the location of antigen, cell surface versus intracellular, the consequent neural damage and response to immunotherapy may differ. It is thought that antibodies directed toward intracellular antigens are probably not causative of neural injury, because the antibodies do not come in direct contact with the intracellular epitopes. The immune response in these disorders with intracellular antigens involves cytotoxic T cell–mediated cytotoxicity. In contrast, antibodies against cell surface antigens have access to epitopes on cell surfaces resulting in immune-mediated attack on the function and structure of neurons; these disorders are usually more amenable to immunotherapy treatments ( Table 51.1 ).

TABLE 51.1
Comparison of Features of Neural Antibodies Directed Against Intracellular Proteins Versus Antibodies Against Cell Surface Epitopes
Antibodies Against Intracellular Protein Antibodies Against Cell Surface Epitopes
Examples of antibody targets Nuclear or intracytoplasmic enzymes, transcription factors, RNA binding proteins Neurotransmitter receptors, ion channels, water channels, channel-complex proteins
Pathogenicity Not pathogenic; serves as a biomarker Pathogenic effector
Type of injury Neural-peptide specific cytotoxic effector T cell–mediated injury Antibody-mediated injury
Response to treatment Poorly responsive to immunotherapy Highly responsive to immunotherapy
Tumor association Highly predictive of cancer Not necessarily associated with tumor
Examples ANNA-1 (Hu), ANNA-2 (Ri), GAD65 NMDAR, AMPAR, muscle AChR
AChR, Acetylcholine receptor; AMPAR, alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid receptor; ANNA, anti–neuronal nuclear antibody; GAD65, 65-kDa isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase; NMDAR, N -methyl- d -aspartate receptor.

Diagnostic Principles

  • Key indicators of paraneoplastic autoimmunity-related neurologic disorders include acute to subacute course of disease, multifocal and broad range of neurologic signs and symptoms, and positive family and/or personal history of autoimmunity.

  • Identification of specific antibodies in serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) targeting neural (neuronal and glial) cells may provide clues to the specific cancer type; however, one cannot extrapolate definitively from these data to the neurologic presentation, because one specific antibody may be associated with different phenotypes, and different antibodies may cause the same clinical syndrome.

  • It is not unusual to find more than one serum antibody on testing for paraneoplastic syndromes, because cancer cells often express multiple antigens with resulting activation of an immune response. These antibody clusters allow prediction of the associated cancer. For example, thymoma is present in 85% of patients, younger than 50 years, who have a combination of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody and striational antibody.

  • Antibody testing should be done both in CSF and serum, where indicated, because this will increase the diagnostic yield. CSF has higher sensitivity compared with serum in detection of N -methyl- d -aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antibodies; in contrast, serum is more sensitive for detection of aquaporin-4 (AQP4) IgG.

  • Low titers of paraneoplastic antibodies may be seen in patients with autoimmune disorders, and these may not be pathogenic. Patients prone to autoimmunity may show incidental seropositivity for voltage-gated potassium channel (VGKC) complex or ganglionic AChR without evidence of corresponding neurologic disorders. Therefore the clinical syndrome must match the disease profile of the detected antibody; if it does not, then alternative causes should be sought for the patient's symptoms.

  • Monitoring for relapses primarily consists of serial clinical assessment. Usually, antibody titers are not monitored. In some instances, significant elevation in antibody titers may portend return of the underlying cancer.

  • CSF analysis in paraneoplastic neurologic disorders may show additional abnormalities such as elevated protein, pleocytosis, oligoclonal bands, elevated IgG, IgG index, and/or kappa chains.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here