Pain Amplification Syndromes


Pediatric rheumatologists encounter children with a wide variety of musculoskeletal pains, including those with acute and chronic pain that appears disproportional or amplified, with a degree of pain subsequently suffered. In some cases, there is no clear trigger. Chronic musculoskeletal pain, regardless of its trigger, can bring persistent and recurrent distress, disability, and widespread family disruption. Early recognition, limiting investigations, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation optimizes both child and family outcome, as well as reduces the societal health care burden. In this chapter, the approach and evaluation of pain in children will be addressed first, followed by a review of the presentation and treatment of children with amplified musculoskeletal pain syndromes.

Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Pain

Pain is the subjective expression of an unpleasant sensation or emotional experience associated with actual or perceived tissue damage. It is difficult, if not impossible, for an observer to know with any certainty to what extent another person is in pain. Even experienced observers may differ in their assessments of the degree of pain a child is experiencing. Although parents and children tend to make a similar assessment of the degree of pain, parents may over- or underestimate their child’s pain in relation to the child’s own self-report. An important premise in the evaluation and management of a child in pain is that the child’s report of pain and its severity must be accepted at face value. According to Meinhart and McCaffery, “Pain is what the patient says it is, and exists when he says it does.” Prolonged malingering in childhood is exceedingly rare and, if present, is best addressed through psychotherapy. For pain management to be effective, the child must know that he or she is believed.

Many interacting issues determine whether a child’s pain disturbs the child’s and the family’s functioning, and when, if ever, medical help should be sought ( Fig. 53.1 ).

Fig. 53.1, Factors influencing pain expression and health care seeking.

History and Physical Examination

It is imperative that a complete history of pain-related symptoms ( Box 53.1 ) be obtained, as well as a complete past history and review of systems to ascertain the child’s overall health status. In addition to physical clues, it is helpful to understand any existing behavioral and/or sensory challenges, as this will direct rehabilitation. This may be time-consuming, but it is especially important in children with amplified pain. It is the initial step in establishing a trusting relationship with the child and family, who often feel that their concerns have not been considered seriously and that no one is considering the child as a whole. A few key observations to be made during the physical examination are listed in Box 53.2 .

Box 53.1
History of Musculoskeletal Pain

What is the Character of the Pain?

  • Which body parts are painful?

  • How long has it been present?

  • Is the pain getting better, getting worse, or staying the same?

  • What makes the pain better?

  • What makes the pain worse?

  • Is there diurnal variation in the severity of the pain?

  • Is the pain present at night, and if so, does it waken him or her?

  • Does the pain interfere with function, and if so, what specifically?

  • What descriptive terms are used to describe the pain?

  • Does the pain radiate, migrate, or spread?

  • Is the painful area tender to touch or tender when touching clothing?

  • Is the painful area either cool or warm to the touch?

  • Does the painful part look abnormal or swollen?

  • What is the child’s or parent’s assessment of the pain severity?

Are There Other Symptoms?

  • Fever?

  • Rash?

  • Change in gastrointestinal function?

  • Weight loss?

  • Upper or lower respiratory tract symptoms?

  • Muscle weakness?

  • Sleep disturbance?

  • Depression?

  • Anxiety?

Family and Social History

  • Ankylosing spondylitis, reactive arthritis, or inflammatory bowel disease?

  • Back pain, heel pain, or acute iritis?

  • Psoriasis?

  • Fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome, or other chronic pain condition?

  • Is there an identifiable stressor in the family, school, or peer group?

  • Are there significant or recent life changes?

  • Where is the child sleeping?

  • What activities does the child participate in and how busy are they during the week?

  • How does the child perform in school?

  • How do the parents or caregivers describe the child’s personality?

  • If there was inciting injury, is there a lawsuit in place or contemplated?

box 53.2
The Clinical Examination: Several Key Observations

  • Does the child look well or ill?

  • Is the child’s affect commensurate with the level of reported pain?

  • Does the child have an air of la belle indifference about him or her?

  • Is there any joint swelling?

  • Is there any muscle weakness or atrophy?

  • Is there any tenderness to palpation and if so, is it over joints, entheses, or muscles?

  • Is there any area of allodynia, and if so, is the area constant or does it vary over time?

  • Is there any color, temperature, or perspiration change?

  • Does function vary when observed or when an activity is being focused on and when the child does do not realize he or she is being observed or is distracted?

  • Are there any inconsistencies on repeat examination?

  • If asked to perform an activity that has been reported as being unable to do, can the child do it?

  • Is there any neurological dysfunction?

  • Does the pain occur in an area defined by a dermatome or peripheral nerve distribution?

  • Are there abnormal child-parent interactions such as enmeshment, hostility, or berating?

  • Is there evidence of concurrent conversion (or functional) symptoms?

  • In children with back pain, are signs of nonorganic back pain present?

Laboratory Examination

It is important to have a clear rationale for undertaking any investigation because these children are at risk for overmedicalization. In many situations, no testing is required. A large number of investigations increase the likelihood of false-positive results that may obfuscate the physician and family, cause unnecessary angst, lead to further testing, and delay appropriate treatment. Usually it is appropriate to evaluate indices of inflammation (i.e., complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein). It is unwise to make a diagnosis of a noninflammatory condition in a child with an abnormal blood count, or increased acute phase reactants, unless the abnormalities can be clearly ascribed to an intercurrent illness. In the absence of clinical evidence of inflammatory disease, the benefit of obtaining tests for antinuclear antibodies and rheumatoid factor is outweighed by the risk of obtaining false positive results. Imaging studies should be directed to rule in or out a specific diagnosis (e.g., plain radiographs or bone scintigraphy to exclude trauma or tumor and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] to exclude spinal cord lesions). Bone scintigraphy in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) had a sensitivity of only 0.80 and specificity of 0.73. Bone edema is frequently seen on MRI but cannot be differentiated from trauma. There are no data on children and adolescents.

Amplified Musculoskeletal Pain

Many children with severe musculoskeletal pain do not have an identified inflammatory disease or mechanical derangement to cause the degree of pain and associated debility. These children have usually been seen by multiple health care providers, have undergone multiple investigations, and failed multiple therapeutic trials before the correct diagnosis is made. Unfortunately, attempts to identify an increasingly rare and unlikely cause for the pain or escalating empiric treatment aimed at organic pain can result in perpetuating the amplified pain. Kaufman et al. have documented the increasing overmedicalization of children with amplified pain. A physician who recognizes the condition promptly can provide a great service to the child and family by halting further medical investigations and initiating appropriate therapy.

Historical Review

Chronic musculoskeletal pain in children received scant attention until the latter half of the 20th century. In 1951 Naish and Apley published their landmark study on pediatric limb pains resulting from nonarthritic causes. They attributed roles for emotional factors in many of these children. Since then it has been increasingly recognized that a significant number of children suffer from both chronic and amplified musculoskeletal pain. , Reflex sympathetic dystrophy (Chronic regional Pain syndrome, CRPS) was first described in a child in 1971. The first description of childhood fibromyalgia was published in 1985. CRPS and fibromyalgia are the subjects of most studies, whereas other, less clearly classified amplified musculoskeletal pain conditions, are less frequently reported.

Definition and Classification

Current terms used to describe these conditions have, until recently, been inadequate and confusing because many children have features that are shared among different subsets. , Authors have categorized these children depending on physical features (i.e., the presence of overt autonomic signs or number of painful points with a variety of systemic symptoms) location (localized in one or two body regions), or diffuse (in three or more body regions). , , , The new ICD 11 classification defines chronic pain as persistent or recurrent pain for at least 3 months. This minimum duration is arbitrary, but consistent with previous definitions. The main categories are chronic primary pain and chronic secondary pain. Chronic primary pain is a concept originating from the idea that conditions associated with chronic pain should be acknowledged in their own right, even if a clear understanding of the underlying etiology or pathophysiology is missing. From a pediatric musculoskeletal pain perspective, the relevant sections within Chronic Primary Pain are chronic primary musculoskeletal pain and complex regional pain syndrome. Persistent pain in conjunction with a rheumatologic disease (e.g. juvenile idiopathic arthritis) would fall into the Chronic Secondary Pain category, according to this proposal. 18a The terminology used is, in one sense, moot because evaluation and treatment are similar between subsets. , ,

In this chapter, the term amplified musculoskeletal pain is used because it is descriptive, does not presume an etiology, and differentiates these children from adults with chronic pain. The word amplified refers to the idea that the body amplifies the pain in much the same way as feedback: a vicious cycle between a microphone and a speaker. It is not meant to imply that the child is willfully hyperbolizing. When evaluating any particular study, it is important to know which criteria were used to classify children with various forms of amplified musculoskeletal pain ( Table 53.1 ). Discrete subsets exist in each of the groups. Specifically, children who fulfill criteria for fibromyalgia and chronic widespread pain are included with those with diffuse idiopathic musculoskeletal pain, and those with CRPS are included with those with localized idiopathic musculoskeletal pain. There is a subset of children with intermittent amplified musculoskeletal pain in whom the criterion for duration is not satisfied; they are, nevertheless, included in some reports because of the severity of their pain and marked dysfunction that may recur over years. Because CRPS and fibromyalgia are relatively distinctive and have their own literature, we use these terms when discussing these specific subsets. There are two kinds of CRPS: type I and type II. Type II is similar to the older term causalgia and implies nerve damage. It is exceedingly rare in children, so further all mention of CRPS refers to type I. Many children present with more than one form of amplified pain, such as CRPS of a limb and localized pain to the back or abdomen or even total body pain. Some children meet the definition for both fibromyalgia and CRPS, but actually there is only one underlying condition: amplified pain. Both fibromyalgia and CRPS have overlapping clinical characteristics, demographics, and response to therapy. , ,

TABLE 53.1
Criteria for Different Subsets of Amplified Musculoskeletal Pain
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Type I
Criteria two to four must be satisfied:
  • 1.

    The presence of an initiating noxious event or a cause of immobilization

  • 2.

    Continuing pain, allodynia, or hyperalgesia with which the pain is disproportionate to any inciting event

  • 3.

    Evidence, at some time, of edema, changes in skin blood flow, or abnormal sudomotor activity in the region of the pain

  • 4.

    This diagnosis is excluded by the existence of conditions that would otherwise account for the degree of pain and dysfunction.

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Type II
All three criteria must be satisfied:
  • 1.

    The presence of continuing pain, allodynia, or hyperalgesia after a nerve injury, not necessarily limited to the distribution of the injured nerve

  • 2.

    Evidence at some time of edema, changes in skin blood flow, or abnormal sudomotor activity in the region of the pain

  • 3.

    This diagnosis is excluded by the existence of conditions that would otherwise account for the degree of pain and dysfunction.

  • Budapest Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Complex Regional Pain

All of the following four statements must be met:
  • 1.

    The patient has continuing pain that is disproportionate to any inciting event.

  • 2.

    The patient has at least one sign in two or more of the following categories:

    • a.

      Sensory: hyperalgesia or allodynia

    • b.

      Vasomotor: asymmetrical temperature or skin color

    • c.

      Sudomotor/edema: edema or asymmetrical sweating

    • d.

      Motor/trophic: decreased range of motion, motor dysfunction, or trophic changes (hair, skin, nail)

  • 3.

    The patient reports at least one symptom in three or more of the following categories:

    • a.

      Sensory: reports hyperesthesia or allodynia

    • b.

      Vasomotor: reports asymmetrical temperature or skin color

    • c.

      Motor/trophic: reports decreased range of motion, motor dysfunction, or trophic changes

  • 4.

    No other diagnosis can better explain the signs and symptoms.

1990 American College of Rheumatology Criteria for Fibromyalgia
Both criteria must be satisfied:
  • 1.

    Widespread pain (bilateral, and above and below the waist and axial pain) present for at least 3 months

  • 2.

    Pain (not tenderness) upon digital palpation with 4 kg of pressure on 11 of the following 18 sites:

    • a.

      Occiput: at insertion of suboccipital muscle

    • b.

      Low cervical: at anterior aspect of the intertransverse spaces of C5–C7

    • c.

      Trapezius: at the midpoint of the upper border

    • d.

      Second rib: just lateral to the second costochondral junction at the upper rib border

    • e.

      Scapula: the medial border just above the spine of the scapula

    • f.

      Lateral epicondyle: 2 cm distal to the epicondyle

    • g.

      Gluteal: in the upper outer quadrant of the buttocks

    • h.

      Greater trochanter: 1 cm posterior to the trochanteric prominence

    • i.

      Knees: at the medial fat pad 1 cm proximal to the joint mortise

2010 American College of Rheumatology Criteria for Fibromyalgia
All three conditions must be satisfied:
  • 1.

    Absence of a disorder to explain the pain

  • 2.

    Symptoms present for 3 months

  • 3.

    One of the following (See below):

    • a.

      Widespread pain index ≥7 and symptom severity score ≥5

    • b.

      Widespread pain index 3 to 6 and symptom severity score ≥9

Yunus & Masi Criteria for Childhood Fibromyalgia
All four major and three minor OR the first three major, four painful sites, and five minor need to be satisfied.
Major:
  • 1.

    Generalized musculoskeletal aching at three or more sites for 3 or more months

  • 2.

    Absence of underlying condition or cause

  • 3.

    Normal laboratory tests

  • 4.

    Five or more typical tender points (see sites under 1990 ACR criteria above)

Minor:
  • 1.

    Chronic anxiety or tension

  • 2.

    Fatigue

  • 3.

    Poor sleep

  • 4.

    Chronic headaches

  • 5.

    Irritable bowel syndrome

  • 6.

    Subjective soft tissue swelling

  • 7.

    Numbness

  • 8.

    Pain modulation by physical activities

  • 9.

    Pain modulation by weather factors

  • 10.

    Pain modulation by anxiety or stress

Diffuse Idiopathic Pain
Both criteria must be satisfied:
  • 1.

    Generalized musculoskeletal aching at three or more sites for 3 or more months

  • 2.

    Exclusion of disease that could reasonably explain the symptoms

Localized Idiopathic Pain
All three criteria must be satisfied:
  • 1.

    Pain localized to one limb persisting

    • a.

      1 week with medically directed treatment OR

    • b.

      1 month without medically directed treatment

  • 2.

    Absence of prior trauma that could reasonably explain the symptoms

  • 3.

    Exclusion of diseases that could reasonably explain the symptoms

Widespread pain index is the number of areas of pain in the last week (0–19)
Areas include shoulder girdle, upper arm, lower arm, buttocks/trochanter, upper leg, lower leg, jaw, upper back, lower back (2 points if bilateral), and 1 point each for chest, abdomen, neck.
Symptom severity score (0–12).
Fatigue, waking unrefreshed, cognitive symptoms scored 0 to 3 each
(0= no problem, 1 = mild or intermittent, 2 = moderate or considerable, 3 = severe, continuous).
Plus considering a host of somatic symptoms rated as 0 = no symptoms, 1 = few symptoms, 2 = moderate number of symptoms, 3 = great deal of symptoms (somatic symptoms include muscle pain, irritable bowel syndrome, tiredness, thinking problems, muscle weakness, headache, abdominal pain, numbness and tingling, dizziness, insomnia, depression, constipation, upper abdominal pain, nausea, nervousness, chest pain, blurred vision, fever, diarrhea, dry mouth, itching, wheezing, Raynaud phenomenon, hives, tenderness, vomiting, heartburn, oral ulcers, dysgeusia, seizures, xerophthalmia, shortness of breath, loss of appetite, rash, sensitivity, hearing difficulties, easy bruising, hair loss, urinary frequency, dysuria, bladder spasms).

Epidemiology

There are limited data on the prevalence and incidence of musculoskeletal pain in youth and on the prevalence of pain-associated suffering or disability. However, pain is a common experience during childhood. One study showed that 83% of school-aged children had experienced an episode of pain during the preceding 3 months. Pain is a normal sensation but becomes disabling when it persists and is associated with suffering. In this same study, 31% of the children and adolescents stated that pain had been present for over 6 months. Musculoskeletal pain accounted for 64% of all the pains that were reported. Other studies support this finding and that childhood pain persists into adulthood. ,

The epidemiology of chronic widespread pain (diffuse amplified pain or juvenile fibromyalgia) is difficult to accurately assess. There are no universally agreed diagnostic criteria, although some authors have suggested using the term juvenile fibromyalgia and proposed diagnostic criteria akin to the adult fibromyalgia criteria. The HUNT study showed that 8.5% of a population of 7373 adolescents in Norway fulfilled their criteria for chronic widespread pain; whereas a UK study showed the prevalence of chronic widespread pain in 17-year-olds to be 4.5%. , Other authors have reported fibromyalgia and widespread pain to have a frequency in children and adolescents of 2% to 6%.

Hypermobility, as currently defined, is present in 20% of the normal UK adolescent population. There is a relationship between localized pain and significant hypermobility (Beighton score ≥6).

Low back pain is commonly reported. A UK observational cohort study reported the prevalence of low back pain as 16% in 17-year-olds.

The incidence of CRPS in adults is estimated to be 5 to 26 per 100,000. , In children, the epidemiology of amplified pain has not been robustly evaluated, but studies have demonstrated that approximately 80% of the cases reported are girls ranging from 8 to 16 years. There tends to be a delay in recognizing the diagnosis. A complicating factor is the lack of clear diagnostic criteria for children.

There are no specific data regarding the other amplified musculoskeletal pain syndromes, but 5% to 8% of new patients presenting to North American pediatric rheumatology centers most likely have a form of amplified musculoskeletal pain. , Many pediatric rheumatologists believe they are seeing increasing numbers of children with amplified musculoskeletal pain.

In juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), it is clear that persistent pain is a significant problem for many children after inflammation is in remission. A significant minority progress to develop localized or diffuse musculoskeletal pain that is not directly related to the control of their inflammatory condition.

Age at Onset

Amplified musculoskeletal pain has been described in patients as young as 2 years of age, but the majority of reports involve children in late childhood and adolescence. , , , , , The incidence of chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain peaks in older adolescence.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here