Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Medication use during lactation occurs in almost 50% of breastfeeding women. The most common medications reported include oral contraceptives, systemic antibiotics, “cold preparations,” analgesics/antipyretics, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents.
The benefits of continued breastfeeding with maternal medication use almost always outweigh the potential risk to the infant. Every clinical situation is different, based on the specifics for the mother–infant dyad. A careful, informed risk–benefit assessment should be calculated and discussed with the mother to facilitate her informed decision-making. Maintenance of the milk supply should be optimized until a final decision is made.
Important variables to be considered about a specific medication’s use during breastfeeding include route of administration, absorption via that route and orally via the infant’s gastrointestinal tract, half-life, volume of distribution, size of molecule (molecular weight), solubility (in water vs. lipids), dissociation constant (p K a ), and protein binding. Additionally, it is important to know about the specific medication, including its milk-to-plasma ratio, usual maternal plasma levels of the drug, the relative infant dose, and available evidence on the medication’s use in lactation and its effects on the breastfeeding infant.
Given continually changing evidence on medication use and lactation, it is essential that the health care professional review the most recent information on one of the frequently updated online resources before making decisions or recommendations (e.g., LactMed, Infantrisk.com).
As more women breastfeed and breastfeed longer, in keeping with the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendations, questions about the safety of medications during lactation increase, along with estimated use of medications during lactation by 50% of women. 1 , 2 , 3 There are a couple of continually updated information resources on drugs during lactation. One has been developed with advice from an expert panel for the National Library of Medicine called LactMed. It is a peer-reviewed and fully referenced database of possible drugs used during lactation. The data include maternal and infant levels of drugs, possible effects on nurslings and on lactation itself, and a list of alternative drugs. The address is https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547441/ . 4 Another resource is privately managed by Dr. Thomas Hale, PhD, and is available as a book ( Medications and Mothers’ Milk ) and as an online resource at http://www.halesmeds.com as well as a website ( www.infantrisk.com ) and call-line (806-352-2519). Given these resources and the constantly changing available information on medications and lactation, this chapter reports information only on selected medications, herbs and products in breast milk, and how a clinician can utilize the available information on medications and lactation to optimize the health of the mother–infant dyad and facilitate ongoing exclusive breastfeeding. For the most up-to-date information, the previously mentioned resources should be consulted.
With the plethora of resources about drugs and chemicals, many of which are available to the layperson and mother herself, there is the risk for an untrained person misinterpreting the data. 5 , 6 Having said that, there is evidence in the literature that women do engage in a “reiterative, information seeking and analysis process” when faced with a decision about utilizing a complementary medicine product during lactation. 7 , 8 Even a medical professional untrained in lactation physiology who offers medical advice based on information gleaned from various resources can interfere with safe and appropriate use of a medication for the mother and ongoing breastfeeding. The Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rules from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), updated in 2014, are intended to provide information (in package labeling) in a narrative summary style, including a “risk summary” (presence of the drug in human milk, effects of the drug on milk production and the breastfed child, a statement on the risk–benefit ratio of use), a section on “clinical considerations” (information on minimizing exposure and monitoring for adverse reactions), and a section on “data” (the published information utilized to formulate the clinical and risk sections). 9 A professional needs to understand not just the plasma and milk levels but also the pharmacology of the drug and physiology of lactation to give helpful instructions that will mitigate the effect of the drug on an infant and avoid discontinuing breastfeeding unnecessarily. LactMed and Hale’s online resources give basic instructions on how to use the information contained in their databases.
Despite the overwhelming advantages of human milk and the advantages of being breastfed, at times, the risk of a maternal medication adversely affecting a nursing infant must be considered. Even when data about the medication, such as the milk-to-plasma ratio, are available, a physician has to consider several factors related to each infant and each situation before deciding if breastfeeding can be initiated or continued. 10 The more complicated a mother’s medical problems, the greater the possibility that the infant also has complications of prematurity or illness that will alter its ability to excrete the medication. This situation requires scientific information and experienced clinical judgment to appraise the problems and determine the therapeutic regimen. The clinician must determine the risk–benefit ratio of continued breastfeeding. The data are meager and sometimes conflicting for some drugs, yet maternal medication is the single most common medical problem in managing breastfeeding patients reported to the Breastfeeding and Lactation Center in Rochester, New York.
The AAP Committee on Drugs published a list of drugs and other chemicals that transfer into human breast milk. The list, which was last updated in 2013, is divided into those that are contraindicated, those that require temporary interruption of breastfeeding, and those that are compatible with breastfeeding. 10 Concern about the issue of drugs in breast milk has spread. That classification is different from the previously used FDA Pregnancy Categories of Risk, which separates medications based on the amount and quality of available studies in pregnant women and animals (A, B, C, D, X) and not on either incidence of reactions or the potential severity of risk. 11 The FDA has new labeling rules for medications, the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule of 2014. 9 The database and book authored by Dr. Thomas Hale and his team use a lactation risk classification (LRC) based on their assessment of the risk data (L1=compatible with breastfeeding, L2=probably compatible, L3=probably compatible [individualized assessment of the benefits versus risk needed], L4=possibly hazardous, L5=hazardous). 12 All of these risk categorization strategies are oversimplifications. The decision about the use of a medication, herb, or product by a lactating woman necessitates an individualized risk–benefit assessment for the mother and the infant based on the available information, with the mother/parents included in that information review and the decision-making.
A study of more than 14,000 pregnant women in 148 hospitals in 22 countries revealed that 79% of women received an average of 3.3 drugs. 10 The drugs most often given were analgesics and anesthetics. Of the 91% of women who initiated breastfeeding, 36% received methylergonovine, and 5% received antibiotics. Another study of 885 women 3 to 5 months postpartum in Oslo showed that breastfeeding women took fewer medications (daily dose/1000 women/day) than nonbreastfeeding women. 13 The most common medication in the latter group was oral contraceptives. Colds, dyspepsia, hemorrhoids, and breast infections were the disorders identified in this study that precipitated the use of albuterol (salbutamol), clemastine fumarate (Tavist), dexchlorpheniramine maleate (cold preparations), phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride (Comtrex, Dimetane), cromolyn sodium, and methotrimeprazine hydrochloride (levomepromazine).
A more recent systematic review of breastfeeding practices and postpartum women’s use of medicines included 20 studies (cohort and cross-sectional) from nine countries. 3 The proportion of women using ≥1 medicine during lactation ranged from 34% to 100%. The three largest reviews included studies from Sweden ( n =102,995), Norway ( n =106,329), and Denmark ( n =15,756) in which the percentages of medication use were 51%, 57% and 34%, respectively. In the four registered databases, from Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, and Denmark, the most commonly documented medications were oral contraceptives and systemic antibiotics, whereas in the other studies, analgesics/antipyretics, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and antibiotics were the most common (without including iron, vitamins, and minerals). Long-term use of medications for chronic illnesses in Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands in the first 3 months postpartum included cardiovascular medications, thyroid therapy, antiasthma, antidepressants/antipsychotics, medications for diabetes, and antileptics. In five smaller studies from Brazil and Canada, breastfeeding appeared to be affected by postpartum medication use by the mothers, including noninitiation of breastfeeding or stopping breastfeeding earlier than intended. 3
No substitute exists for specific knowledge about the individual medications and their use in lactation. It is equally inappropriate to discontinue breastfeeding when it is not medically necessary as it is to continue breastfeeding while taking contraindicated drugs.
Consideration of the pharmacokinetics contributes to the understanding of the potential problems involved. Given the limited data available in humans, some reported data have been extrapolated from experiments performed on cows, goats, and rodents. Bovine experiments have been conducted using continuous infusions, which provide data on the passage of a drug into milk under certain pH and plasma levels. Animal studies are not particularly useful because there is so much variability in the protein and fat composition of different species’ milk and the existence of active transport systems in different species. Human pharmacokinetic studies are necessary to quantify the amount of drug that passes to human milk. 14 Medical professionals should not try to “oversimplify” the data but can consult with local pharmacologists knowledgeable in medications and lactation or available hotlines and support groups for assistance. (See Chapter 25, Appendix G for some of these resources.)
Factors that influence the passage of a drug into the milk in humans include the size of the molecule, its solubility in lipids and water, whether it binds to protein, the drug’s pH, and diffusion rates. Passive diffusion is the principal factor in the passage of a drug from plasma into milk. The drug may appear in an active form or as an inactive metabolite.
The following outline summarizes these factors:
Drugs
Route of administration
Oral
Intravenous (IV)
Intramuscular (IM)
Transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS)
Absorption rate
Half-life or peak serum time
Dissociation constant
Volume of distribution
Size of molecule
Degree of ionization
pH of substrate
Plasma: 7.4
Milk: 6.8
Solubility
In water
In lipids
Protein binding more to plasma than to milk protein
A most important factor that has received relatively little attention is the infant and how the infant absorbs the medication and is affected by it. Will the infant absorb the chemical from the intestinal tract? If the infant absorbs the chemical, can the infant detoxify and excrete it, or will minimal amounts in the milk accumulate in the infant’s system? Is the infant premature, small for gestational age, or high risk because of complications of the pregnancy or delivery? How will these factors affect metabolism or reaction to a medication? Is the drug a material that could be safely given to an infant directly, and at what risk? What dosages and blood levels are safe? Actual data answering these latter two questions are more critical than pharmacokinetic theory. The ultimate question faced by the physician is, “Can this infant be safely exposed to this chemical/medication as it appears in breast milk without a risk that exceeds the benefits of being breastfed?” Almost any drug present in a mother’s blood will appear to some degree in her milk.
Drugs entering the circulation become protein bound or remain free in the circulation. The protein-bound component of the drug serves as an inactive reservoir for the drug that is in equilibrium with the free drug. Most drugs enter the mammary alveolar cells in the unbound form ( Fig. 11.1 ).
At term, plasma proteins may be reduced and the fatty acid and hypoprotein fraction slightly increased in the mother, which results in the displacement of some drugs from plasma proteins. During the early postpartum period, for 5 to 7 weeks, the free fraction of some drugs increases and therefore more readily crosses into milk (e.g., salicylate, phenytoin, diazepam).
For most drugs, a higher concentration will be found in the plasma than in the milk. Only the small free fraction of a drug can cross the biologic membrane. The total concentration in milk is only minimally influenced by the binding of drugs to milk proteins (milk protein concentration is 0.9% in mature milk). Only those drug molecules that are free in solution can pass through the endothelial pores, either by diffusion or by reverse pinocytosis. Pinocytosis is the process whereby drug molecules dissolved in the interstitial fluid attach to receptors located at the surface of the cell membrane. The cell membrane invaginates at the site of the drug attachment, bringing the drug into the cell. The membrane is pinched off, and the drug, surrounded by membrane, remains in the cell. Then the membrane is dissolved, leaving the drug molecule free in the cell.
Reverse pinocytosis is the process by which the apical membrane evaginates after fusion of the intracellular membrane-bound secretion granules with the plasma membrane. The granules include lipids, proteins, lactose, drug molecules, and other cellular constituents. The evagination of the plasma membrane is pinched off and released into the alveolar lumen. Within the extravascular space, the drug may be bound to proteins in the interstitial fluid. Some agents in free solution can pass into the alveolar milk directly by way of the spaces between the mammary alveolar cells. These paracellular areas account for a major portion of the fluid changes across the epithelium. These spaces between adjacent alveolar cells serve to carry water-soluble drugs from the tissue into the milk.
The intercellular junctions are “open” at delivery as lactation is being established and gradually “tighten” over the next few days. The amount of drug passed into milk on day 1 is greater than on day 3 or later. The composition of the milk changes from colostrum to mature milk, altering the amount of protein and fat, which can also influence drug levels in the milk. It is always important to know when plasma and milk samples were measured in relationship to the onset of lactation. Furthermore, some studies have been done on nonlactating women by pumping enough milk to measure the drug. These “weaning samples” do not reflect the normal physiology of lactation and therefore provide only misinformation.
Drugs that are nonionized are excreted in the milk in greater amounts than are ionized compounds. Depending on the pH of the solvent and the drug dissociation constant (p K a ), many weak electrolytes are more or less ionized in solution. Blood plasma and interstitial fluid are slightly alkaline (pH 7.4). Drugs that are weak acids are ionized to a greater extent in alkaline solution and are more extensively bound to protein. The amount of drug excreted from plasma (pH 7.4) to milk (pH 6.8 to 7.3, average 7.0) depends on the pH of the compound. Thus a weakly acidic compound has a higher concentration in plasma than in milk. Conversely, weakly alkaline compounds are in equal or higher levels in the milk than in the plasma.
The degree of drug ionization changes with the pH of the plasma and milk. Weak bases become more ionized with decreasing pH; thus the ionized component will increase in milk. Depending on the pH of the solvent and the drug dissociation constant (p K a ), many weak electrolytes are more or less ionized in solution. Blood plasma and interstitial fluid are slightly alkaline (pH 7.4) compared with milk (pH 6.8 to 7.3, average 7.0) The concentration in plasma and milk for the nonionized fraction will be the same, but the total amount of drug in the milk will be greater than in plasma. Drugs that are weak acids are ionized to a greater extent in alkaline solution and are more extensively bound to protein. The amount of drug excreted from plasma to milk depends on the pH of the compound. The amount of drug ionization changes with the pH of the plasma and milk.
The sulfonamides demonstrate the effect of the p K a on the concentration of drug that reaches the milk. Sulfacetamide, with a low p K a (5.4), has a low milk-to-plasma (M/P) ratio (0.08), whereas sulfanilamide has a p K a of 10.4 and an M/P ratio of 1.00 ( Table 11.1 ).
Sulfonamide | M/P Ratio | p K a |
---|---|---|
Sulfacetamide | 0.08 | 5.4 |
Sulfadiazine | 0.21 | 6.5 |
Sulfathiazole | 0.43 | 7.1 |
Sulfamethazine | 0.51 | 7.4 |
Sulfapyridine | 0.85 | 8.4 |
Sulfanilamide | 1.00 | 10.4 |
The passage of molecules into the milk also depends on the size of the molecule, or the molecular weight (mol wt, in daltons). Water-filled membranous pores permit the movement of molecules of less than 100 mol wt. Because of action similar to the limitation of transport of certain large-molecular-weight chemicals across the placenta, insulin and heparin are not found in human milk either, presumably because of the molecules’ large size.
The alveolar epithelium of the breast is a lipid barrier that is most permeable in the first few days of lactation when colostrum is being produced. The solubility of a compound in water and in lipid is a determining factor in its transfer. Nonionized drugs, which are lipid soluble, usually dissolve in the lipid phase of the membrane. The solubility is closely linked to the manner in which the drug crosses the membranes ( Table 11.2 ). The membrane of the alveolar epithelial cells is composed of lipoprotein, glycolipid, phospholipid, and free lipids, as described in Chapter 3 . The transfer of water-soluble drugs and ions is inhibited by this hydrophobic barrier. Water-soluble materials pass through pores in the basement membrane and paracellular spaces. Low lipid solubility of a nonionized compound will diminish its excretion into milk.
General Drug Type | Milk/Plasma (M/P) Ratio |
---|---|
Highly lipid-soluble drugs | ~1 |
Highly protein-bound drugs in maternal serum | <1 |
Small (molecular weight <200) water-soluble drugs | ~1 |
Weak acids | ≤1 |
Weak bases | ≥1 |
Actively transported drugs | >1 |
Lipid solubility affects the profile of the drug in the milk and plasma. A drug with high lipid solubility will have parallel elimination curves in the plasma and the milk. A drug with low lipid solubility will clear the plasma at a constant rate, but the clearance curve for the milk will peak lower and later, and the drug will linger in the milk. A prolonged terminal elimination phase may exist when the time between feedings is long.
If the agent is fat soluble, the fat content of the milk may be a significant variable. The fat content at any feeding increases over time; thus the so-called foremilk is low in fat, and the hindmilk is four to five times richer in fat toward the end of a feeding. Even though the total amount of fat will be about the same in each 24-hour period, the total amount of fat in a given feeding is less in the morning, peaks at midday, and drops off in the evening. The coefficient of lipid solubility for a nonionized drug determines both its penetration of the biologic membrane to gain entrance to milk and its concentration in milk fat. Sulfonamides with low fat solubility are in the aqueous and protein fraction of milk, whereas many barbiturates are in the lipid fraction. An inverse relationship exists between a drug’s lipid solubility and the amount that appears in the skim fraction. The concentrations in fat differ for each member of the barbital family. Pentobarbital and secobarbital are found in the lipid phase, whereas phenobarbital is found in the aqueous phase.
The half-life (T 1/2 ) of a medication is the amount of time it takes for half of the drug to be removed from the body by the various metabolic processes and is most often measured as the time it takes for the plasma level to drop by one-half at steady state (plasma half-life). A shorter drug half-life is preferred because there would likely be less exposure of the infant to the drug, and it might be possible to dose the medication to limit the infant’s drug exposure in the milk.
Drugs pass into milk by simple diffusion, carrier-mediated diffusion, or active transport, as follows:
Simple diffusion: Concentration gradient decreases
Carrier-mediated diffusion: Concentration gradient decreases
Active transport: Concentration gradient increases
Pinocytosis: Active membrane transport into the cell via receptors
Reverse pinocytosis: Active membrane transport out of the cell
Nonelectrolytes such as ethanol, urea, and antipyrine enter the milk by diffusion through the lipid membrane barrier and may reach the same concentrations in the milk as in the plasma, regardless of the pH. The main entrance site of molecules is at the basement luminal membrane, where water-soluble materials pass through the alveolar pores. Nonionized drugs cross the membrane more easily than ionized ones because of the structure of the membrane. The nonionized drugs pass through the membrane by diffusion. When simple diffusion takes place, the M/P ratio is 1.0. Passive diffusion provides the same ratio regardless of the plasma concentrations of the drug or the volume of milk secreted. Different M/P ratios depend on the binding to protein and are a measure of the protein-free fraction. The dissimilar ratios for the sulfa drugs (see Table 11.1 ) partly result from the difference in protein binding and partly from ionization.
Large molecules depend on their lipid solubility and ionization to cross the membrane because they pass in a lipid-soluble, nonionized form. The M/P ratio is determined when equilibrium exists in the amount of nonionized drug in the aqueous phase on both sides of the membrane. When drugs are only partially ionized, the nonionized fraction determines the concentration that crosses the membrane. The drugs for which the nonionized fraction is not very lipid soluble will pass only in a limited degree into breast milk.
Passive drug transport may occur in the form of facilitated diffusion . The active compound is transported across the cell membrane by a carrier enzyme or protein. The gradient is toward a lesser or equal concentration in both simple diffusion and facilitated diffusion and is controlled by chemical activity gradients. Facilitated diffusion usually involves water-soluble substance too large to pass through the membrane pores.
Active transport mechanisms provide a process whereby the gradient is “uphill,” or higher, in the milk. The process is similar to facilitated diffusion except that metabolic energy is required to overcome the gradient. Examples of substances actively transported include glucose, amino acids, calcium, magnesium, and sodium. Pinocytosis and reverse pinocytosis, as described previously, are involved in the transport of very large molecules and proteins. Chloride ions are secreted into milk via an active apical membrane pump, whereas sodium and potassium diffuse by electrical gradient. Because the level of sodium is kept low, an active return of sodium may occur into the plasma, referred to as a reverse pump . Retrograde diffusion, the passage of a drug back into the maternal bloodstream from the milk, is another mechanism influencing the level of drug in the milk. The same variable affecting the drug’s diffusion into the milk will affect its passage back into the plasma. Drugs with a shorter half-life will demonstrate greater variations in drug level within the milk as a result of retrograde diffusion. 14
Pharmacokinetic principles relate to the specific variation with time of the drug concentration in the blood or plasma as a result of its absorption, distribution, and elimination. Ultimately, by extrapolation of these factors, one determines the bioavailability of the drug. The most elementary kinetic model is based on the body as a single compartment. Distribution of the drug in the compartment is assumed to be uniform and rapidly equilibrated. In the single-compartment model, the volume of distribution of a drug is considered to be the same as that of the plasma, assuming a rapid uniform distribution. 15
The volume of distribution ( V d ) is calculated as follows:
The absorption and elimination are considered to be exponential or first-order kinetics. A two-compartment model of drug kinetics considers the phase of decreasing drug concentration as the drug distributes into the tissues. Initially, concentrations fall rapidly as the drug distributes, then first-order elimination follows. When considering the pharmacokinetics of drugs in breast milk, one must also consider that elimination in the breast is by two potential routes: excreted with the milk to the infant and back-diffusion into the plasma to reequilibrate with the falling level in the plasma.
With access to the volume of distribution of the drug in question, the amount of the dose, and the weight of the mother, the concentration of drug in breast milk may be theoretically calculated as follows:
By definition, the M/P ratio is the concentration of a drug in the mother’s milk divided by its concentration in the mother’s plasma at the same time. A higher M/P ratio indicates that a higher amount of drug will reach the milk for a given concentration. The overall amount of drug reaching the milk is primarily determined by the concentration of the drug in the plasma. If choosing between two drugs with different M/P ratios, then the drug with the lower M/P ratio is less likely to reach the milk than the one with the higher M/P ratio given the same plasma concentrations of the drugs.
The concentration of the drug in the circulation of the mother depends on the mode of administration: oral, IV, IM, or TDDS. Absorption through the skin, the lungs (inhalants), or vaginally may also need to be considered.
The levels in the blood depend on the route of administration. The curves produced by bolus IV medication peak high and early and taper sharply, thus making avoiding peak plasma levels more feasible. Absorption from IM dosing is less rapid but follows a similar but less sharp curve. Oral dosing depends on other factors, such as whether the medication is taken between or during meals. Depending on the curve of uptake and removal of drug from the plasma, the area under the curve varies. Single doses are simple area-under-the-curve calculations, but calculations for multiple doses or chronic use vary with the steady state of the drug in the body. The mode of administration is important in determining the overall bioavailability of a drug. TDDS patches are constructed to deliver the medication at a constant rate continuously over a period of time.
The TDDS depends on absorption of the drug through the skin at a steady rate; it has become a significant route of administration for certain medications. The delivery rate is determined by diffusion of the drug from the reservoir matrix through the epidermis. This method offers some advantages, including convenience of dosing, reduced dosing frequency, ease of reaching a steady state, increased patient compliance, avoidance of first-pass hepatic biotransformation, avoidance of peaks and valleys in blood levels, and reduction of side effects through heightened selectivity of drug action. 16 The level in the plasma remains constant during the drug’s anticipated life span while the patch is in place. The technology is limited to drugs with low molecular weight that are hydrophilic and can diffuse through the stratum corneum. The top molecular weight is 500 daltons. For patient compliance and economics, the patch size is limited to 50 cm in diameter. Occasional patients experience skin irritation. Currently, patches are limited to drugs that are potent in small amounts and highly diffusible through the skin. To maintain a constant rate, a surplus of the drug must be present, often 20 to 30 times the amount that will be absorbed during the time of application. The potential for toxicity is great. If a patch is utilized while lactating, it should be applied and covered so that a nursing infant cannot accidentally get to it. TDDS patches are available for scopolamine, nicotine, clonidine, fentanyl, and other drugs ( Table 11.3 ).
Generic Drug | Brand Name | Strengths/Release Rate | Application Frequency | Total Drug Content per Patch |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clonidine | Catapres-TTS | 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 mg/24 h | 7 days | 2.5, 5, 7.5 mg |
Estradiol | Alora | 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1 mg/24 h | 7 days | 0.77, 1.5, 2.3, 3.1 mg |
Climara | 0.025, 0.0375, 0.05, 0.06, 0.75, 0.1 mg/24 h | 7 days | 2, 2.85, 3.8, 4.55, 5.7, 7.6 mg | |
Estraderm | 0.05, 0.1 mg/24 h | 3-4 days | 4 mg, 8 mg | |
Vivelle-Dot | 0.025, 0.0375, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1 mg/24 h | 3-4 days | 0.62/2.7 mg, 0.51/4.8 mg | |
Estradiol/Norelgestromin | Ortho Evra | 20 mcg/150 mcg/24 h | 7 days | 0.75 mg/6 mg |
Fentanyl | Duragesic | 12.5, 25, 50, 100 mcg/h | 72 hours | 1.25, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 mg |
Lidocaine | Lidoderm | 35 mg/12 h | 12 h/day | 700 mg |
Methylphenidate | Daytrana | 10, 15, 20, 30 mg/9 h | 9 h/day | 27.5, 41, 3, 55, 82.5 mg |
Nicotine | Habitrol | 7, 14, 21 mg/24 h | 16–24 h/day | 17.5, 35, 52.5 mg |
NicoDerm CQ | 7, 14, 21 mg/24 h | 16–24 h/day | 36, 78, 114 mg | |
Nitroglycerin | Nitro-Dur | 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 mg/h | 12–14 h/day | 20, 40, 60, 80, 120, 160 mg |
Minitran | 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 mg/h | 12–14 h/day | Approximately 8.6, 17, 34, 51.4 mg | |
Oxybutynin | Oxytrol | 3.9 mg/24 h | 24 h | 36 mg |
Rotigotine | Neupro | 2, 4, 6 mg/24 h | 24 h | 4.5, 9, 13.5 mg |
Scopolamine | Transderm-Scop | 1.0 mg/72 h | 3 days | 1.5 mg |
Selegiline | Emsam | 6, 9, 12 mg/24 h | 24 h | 20, 30, 40 mg |
Testosterone | Androderm | 2.5, 5 mg/24 h | 24 h | 12.2, 24, 3 mg |
A summary of the steps in the passage of drugs into breast milk follows:
Mammary alveolar epithelium represents a lipid barrier with water-filled pores and is most permeable for drugs during the colostral phase of milk secretion (first week postpartum).
Drug excretion into milk depends on the drug’s degree of ionization, molecular weight, solubility in fat and water, and the relation of the pH of plasma (7.4) to the pH of milk (7.0).
Drugs preferably enter mammary cells basally in the nonionized, nonprotein-bound form by diffusion or active transport.
Water-soluble drugs of less than 200 mol wt pass through water-filled membranous pores.
Drugs leave mammary alveolar cells apically by diffusion or active transport.
Drugs may enter milk via spaces between mammary alveolar cells.
Most ingested drugs appear in milk; drug amounts in milk usually do not exceed 1% of ingested dosage, and levels in the milk are independent of milk volume.
Drugs are bound much less to milk proteins than to plasma proteins.
The drug-metabolizing capacity of mammary epithelium is not understood.
Although concern surrounds the amount of a given agent in the breast milk, of greater importance is the amount absorbed into an infant’s bloodstream. No accurate way exists to predict this because numerous factors affect absorption from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and the metabolic and elimination processes acting on the drug in an infant’s bloodstream. The tolerance of the chemical to the pH of the stomach and the enzymatic activity of the intestinal tract are additional significant factors. The volume of milk consumed is a factor as well. Some drugs are not well absorbed with food (see later discussion of food–drug interactions). The oral bioavailability of a compound is a major factor relative to the exposure of an infant to a drug.
Any drug given to an infant by any route has to be evaluated according to the infant’s ability to detoxify or conjugate the chemical in the liver and excrete it in the urine or eliminate it in stool. Some compounds that appear in milk at very low levels are not well excreted by infants and therefore can accumulate in infants’ systems to the point of toxicity.
Drugs that depend on the liver for conjugation, such as acetaminophen, are theoretic risks because of the limited reserve of the neonatal hepatic detoxification system. When actual measurements were made of neonates given acetaminophen, they were noted to handle it well because they conjugate it in the sulfhydryl system as an alternative pathway, which is used only to a small extent in adult metabolism of acetaminophen. When a single dose of a drug is given to a mother and the level is measured in her milk and in her infant, it does not give a clear picture of the potential for accumulation in the infant’s system. The competition for binding a drug to protein is also important. Some drugs, such as sulfadiazine, compete for binding sites that might normally bind bilirubin in the first week or so of life. This puts an infant in jeopardy of kernicterus at a given bilirubin level because of an increase in the fraction of bilirubin left unbound for lack of binding sites.
The maturity of an infant at birth is an extremely important factor during the first few months of life; thus the gestational age at birth should be established. Clearly, the less mature the infant, the less well tolerated drugs are, not only because of the immaturity of the organ systems but also because of differences in body composition ( Fig. 11.2 ). The less mature an infant, the greater the water content of the body and the proportion of extracellular water. Although the percentage of body weight that is protein is similar for all newborns (i.e., 12%), the absolute amount of protein for binding is less the smaller an infant is. The amount of body fat is also low, by percentage of body weight and in absolute values. The distribution of highly lipid-soluble drugs therefore will be more apt to deposit in the brain of a 1000-g infant with 3% body fat by weight than in a 3500-g full-term infant with 12% body fat. This may explain the more sedating effect of a drug on the central nervous system (CNS) of a smaller, younger, and less mature infant. The relative lack of plasma protein-binding sites in a small, premature infant compared with a more mature, older infant results in more free (unbound) active drug in circulation. Complications of premature birth, such as acidosis and hypoxia, also contribute to the unavailability of albumin-binding sites and thus result in more unbound drug.
The inability of the liver to metabolize drugs effectively results in the accumulation of some compounds that might be readily cleared by an older infant. At about 42 weeks’ conceptual age, an infant’s liver is able to metabolize most drugs competently. Renal clearance similarly is less effective with decreasing maturity, which increases the risk for drug accumulation. The need to dose a premature infant less frequently is common to many drugs, such as antibiotics, caffeine, and theophylline, and confirms that a small, premature infant does not clear drugs well.
Special problems in neonates, in addition to the presence of jaundice or low serum albumin, may require special consideration. Low Apgar scores at birth, signifying some degree of stress, hypoxia, or acidosis, may alter binding-site availability but may also alter the metabolism and excretion of a drug. Continuing respiratory distress requiring ventilatory support, sepsis, and renal failure demand special consideration when determining if a sick neonate can receive the mother’s milk when she is being treated with certain medications. Prescribing for such a mother should be done in consultation with the neonatologist if the woman is providing milk for her infant.
The age of an infant makes a difference in the total volume of milk consumed; in an older child (already taking complementary foods), the child’s diet includes other food items so that milk does not compose the total intake. Age can influence the pH of the stomach, the amount of catabolic enzymes in intestinal secretions, and the integrity of the mucosal barrier, thus affecting drug ionization, metabolism, and absorption. Age influences the infant’s ability to metabolize drugs more effectively; for example, sulfa drugs can be given to infants after the first month of life, whereas they may cause toxicity in the first month of life. The age of the child also must be taken into consideration with regard to the volume of breast milk ingested per feeding and per day, with a greater volume of milk leading to greater exposure. The usual estimate of intake for an exclusively breastfed infant is 150 mL/kg per day. The agent may appear in low levels in a mother’s serum, but mammary blood flow during lactation is 500 mL/min, and a mother produces between 60 and 300 mL of milk per hour. Even an agent that appears in minimal concentrations in the milk may present a significant problem when one considers that 1000 mL of milk may be consumed in a day by an older infant. Even though the volume is low during the colostral phase of lactation, the breast itself is more permeable to drugs; therefore a higher concentration of drug may enter the colostrum. The immaturity of the infant’s developing organs may predispose those organs to greater sensitivity/toxicity to certain medications.
The M/P ratio for drugs has been measured and reported for many medications. By definition, the M/P ratio is the concentration of the drug in the milk versus the concentration in maternal plasma (serum) at the same time. It presumes that the relationship between the two concentrations remains constant, which, in most cases, it does not. If it were a constant, it would allow the estimation of the amount of drug in the milk from any given plasma level in a mother.
An inaccurate ratio, or one determined under variable circumstances, produces erroneous estimates of the amount of drug in the milk, A pharmacokinetic model is a requisite foundation for studies of drugs in breast milk. A single-point-in-time M/P ratio, or an average ratio calculated with single-dose, area-under-the-curve data, does not work for all drugs. Neither ratio accounts for the importance of time-dependent variations of drug concentration in milk.
The M/P ratio is most valuable if obtained when an infant would be nursed. If the ratio is 1:0, it means only that the levels are equal. If the level is minimal in a mother’s plasma because of the large volume of distribution, and if the milk level is also low, the M/P ratio is 1:0. If levels are drawn at the peak plasma level and are equal, the M/P is still 1:0, but the infant receives a large dose. Thus the M/P ratio is valuable only when the time of the measurement is known in relationship to the dosing of the mother. Dose strength, duration of dosing, maternal variation in drug disposition, maternal disease, drug interactions and competition of additional drugs for metabolism or binding sites, and racial variations in drug metabolism all influence the M/P interpretation. The M/P ratio may be greater than 1, which sounds alarming; however, a drug with a large volume of distribution will have low levels in the plasma, leading to a relatively lower amount reaching the milk. The M/P ratio only confirms that the drug gets in the milk; the plasma level of the drug in the mother has to be known at steady state and/or the highest values after intermittent dosing to estimate the likely dose the infant is exposed to.
The paucity of carefully controlled studies on large enough samples to validate the results when such a large number of variables are active has been lamented by many authors. Some data collected are not pharmacokinetically sound. A clinician needs to understand these variables, as well as pharmacokinetic principles, to make a reasonable judgment about a given case.
Interethnic and racial differences in drug responsiveness are well recognized. The increased heterogeneity of national populations has brought increased awareness of genetic diversity. Plasma binding, especially with drugs dependent on glycoproteins for binding, often varies greatly between Caucasian and Chinese subjects, for example. Such factors contribute to the differences in drug disposition and pharmacologic response.
It should be theoretically possible to determine how much of a specific drug reaches an infant in the mother’s milk by knowing all the properties of the drug, including its volume of distribution, ionization, p K a , lipid solubility, protein-binding activity, and rate of detoxification in the maternal system. There is enough variation in the levels that reach an infant and in how the infant deals with the agent, however, that makes it necessary to have specific data about a specific drug. Thus specific information about the mother, the infant, the drug, and the clinical scenario should facilitate the identification of relative risks or benefits, leading to an informed decision-making process.
The first question to ask about infant safety is, “Is this a drug that can be given to the infant directly if necessary?” Antibiotics (e.g., penicillin) that one could give an infant are in this category, whereas an antibiotic such as chloramphenicol, which one would not give an infant under ordinary circumstances, should be avoided in a nursing mother. The toxicity of chloramphenicol in an infant is dose related and associated with an unpredictable accumulation of the drug. Also, an idiosyncratic reaction occurs with chloramphenicol, which is unrelated to dose but causes pancytopenia.
If the drug in question can be given to an infant, does the amount in the milk create any risk to the infant? Phenobarbital can be given to infants for various reasons; thus the question is whether enough phenobarbital in the breast milk will reach the infant to cause difficulty. The infant should be watched for symptoms of lethargy or sleepiness, such as a change in feeding or sleeping pattern. If the infant is sleeping long periods and feeding less than usual (specifically, fewer than five or six times per day), the medication may be at fault. Phenobarbital is a significant drug for a mother with seizures; therefore a careful review of the risk–benefit ratio to both mother and infant should be undertaken. Barbiturates vary in their effect in young infants. A newborn does not handle the short-acting barbiturates well because they are dependent on detoxification in the liver, whereas phenobarbital depends more on the kidney for excretion.
If the drug was taken during pregnancy, as for epilepsy, an infant will already have the drug in his or her system via the placenta at a steady state and will have to begin to excrete it on his or her own after delivery. 17 Enzyme induction may have taken place in the neonate, however, because of exposure to the drug in utero; phenobarbital hastens maturation of the fetal liver. 18 Enzyme induction of the hepatic oxygenase system by phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, and carbamazepine is well established. Valproate, however, does not induce enzyme activity.
If one can safely give a drug to an infant, administration becomes a question of watching for any symptoms of excessive accumulation. The age of the infant affects the ability to clear the drug.
When the drug in question is one not normally given to an infant at that particular age, weight, or degree of maturity, decision-making is more difficult. Specific information about the amount of the drug that appears in the milk is essential in decision-making. Often, conflicting information is available. Many lists of drug-milk levels have perpetuated the same errors in calculation; thus having more than one reference report the same information may not provide confirmation of its accuracy.
If a medication will have to be taken for weeks or months, as with cardiovascular drugs, the drug has a greater potential impact than when taken only for a few days. If the drug exposure has already occurred for 9 months in utero, some think it is less of an issue during lactation; however, the presence of the drug in the milk may compound the problem.
To determine the dose delivered to an infant, the following formula is used:
The average daily dose the infant receives can also be calculated, as follows:
There is variability in the daily milk intake for an exclusively breastfed infant because of the age of the child, the child’s nutritional needs, and the growth and age of the child. 19 The routinely accepted value for daily milk intake of an exclusively breastfed infant is 150 mL/kg per day, which can be used for estimates.
It has been recommended by Ito and by Hale that the calculation be the relative infant dose (RID), which is the weight-adjusted percentage of the maternal dosage. 12 , 20 It is commonly calculated as follows:
The WHO Working Group on Drugs and Human Lactation and others recommend that the RID be less than 10% of the lower dose of the weight-adjusted maternal or infant dosage. They also state that an RID of greater than 25% is enough to proscribe the use of the medication in a lactating mother. There are no published data to justify these specific cutoff values. There are a number of variables that compound the use of the RID in predicting drug safety in lactating women—for example, a mother’s daily dose can vary significantly, the infant’s postnatal age will influence the infant’s milk intake and the enterohepatic circulation of the drug, the drug’s bioavailability in the infant compared with an adult, the existence of active metabolites of a drug, and the fact that the RID may also be reported as a range of percentages. Although there are limitations to the use of RID to predict the safety of medication use during breastfeeding, an appropriately calculated and reported RID can be useful when it is low and is thoughtfully combined with other important drug information for lactating women and infants.
Is sensitization a risk, even in the small dosages of a drug that might pass into the milk? This question arises most frequently with the use of antibiotics, and the use of penicillin is most frequently questioned. Certainly, if a family has a strong history of drug sensitization, it should be considered. In that case, however, it should be questioned for a mother as well. Whether infants are put at risk for developing resistant strains of bacteria in their systems by small amounts of antibiotics in their feedings is a serious question. It is not a question that has been adequately addressed in the literature. It is as pertinent for the dairy and meat industries as for the humans who consume the food products that have a small amount of antibiotics because of administration to livestock.
Very rarely is valid information on the appearance of a drug in breast milk available on the package insert because pharmaceutical companies usually merely indicate that it should not be taken during pregnancy and lactation. To provide more information, they would have to study it, which they typically choose not to do. Agents that may be safe during pregnancy may not be safe during lactation. During pregnancy, the maternal liver and kidney are serving as detoxification and excretion resources for the fetus via the placenta, whereas during lactation, an infant has to handle the drug totally on his or her own after it has reached his or her circulation. An infant in utero receives a drug in greater quantity via the circulation, whereas a nursing infant receives only what reaches the milk. One should be cautious about translating data pertaining to these two periods back and forth. Drugs that are contraindicated in pregnancy may be acceptable during lactation.
The dose of a drug delivered via milk to an infant is significantly affected by oral bioavailability, which is the percentage of the drug absorbed into the infant’s system via the gut.
Oral bioavailability is the rate and extent to which an active drug is absorbed and enters the general circulation. Absolute oral bioavailability compares the oral route with the IV route. To reach the general circulation, an oral dose must pass through the wall of the gut, liver, or mucosa of the upper respiratory tract. 21 First-pass metabolism or elimination in the tissues of these three organs may reduce a drug’s bioavailability. It is possible for a drug to be 100% absorbed and be destroyed or eliminated and have 0% bioavailability because it is so rapidly metabolized.
If a compound is poorly absorbed, it is of less concern than one with 100% bioavailability. Most drugs administered by injection (e.g., insulin, heparin, gentamicin) only are not orally bioavailable.
When drugs are taken with meals, numerous opportunities exist for food–drug interactions to occur. 22 Because a breastfed infant receives all maternal medications excreted in the milk “with food,” this is an important consideration in the discussion of drugs in milk. The effects of food may reduce GI absorption or irritation. Mechanisms of food–drug interactions can be summarized as follows. 22
Physiologic
Changes in gastric emptying
Increased intestinal motility
Increased splanchnic blood flow
Increased bile, acid, and enzyme secretion
Induction and inhibition of drug metabolism
Competition in active transport
Physiochemical
Food as a mechanical barrier to absorption
Altered dissolution of drugs
Chelation and adsorption
Pharmacodynamic
Altered enzyme activity
Changes in homeostasis
There are a number of factors favoring the maternal use of a medication, drug, or product during lactation once it is clear that that the mother has an appropriate diagnosis and indication for the use of the medication.
Pediatric approved use of the medication—The medication is safely used in infants and children with a known dose range.
Favorable safety profile—There is a documented side-effect profile from appropriate studies of medication use in children and/or published information regarding the medication’s safe use during lactation. Or the agent is listed in the generally recognized as safe (GRAS) listing maintained by the FDA.
There is evidence that the medication has little or no effect on the mother’s milk supply or breastfeeding.
The medication has low or no oral bioavailability
Low or very low RID: <10%, <5%, or <1%.
The medication has specific characteristics that are likely to lead to a lower amount of the drug in breast milk, such as shorter half-life, high protein binding, and high molecular weight. There are no or limited active metabolites that could add to the amount of active drug in the milk or affect the mother or infant.
There is adequate information about the potentially exposed infant, including age, size/weight, and amount of milk ingested daily, and no significant conditions affecting excretion, metabolism, or probable sensitivity to the medication
Additional precautions for the use of herbal product include the following: (1) know the chemical substances contained in the herb and their reported effects; (2) consider products from known, reliable sources; (3) use a “pure” form of the herb, not a mixture of herbs; (4) use the lowest dose necessary; and (5) consult a herbalist, lactation consultant, or physician knowledgeable about the herb’s use during lactation before use.
If a mother truly needs a specific medication and the hazards to the infant are minimal, the following important adjustments can be made to minimize the effects:
Do not use the long-acting form of the drug because the infant may have more difficulty renally excreting such an agent or detoxifying it in the liver. Accumulation of the drug or an active metabolite in the infant is then a genuine concern.
Schedule doses so that the smallest possible amount gets into the milk. Check the usual absorption rates and peak blood levels of the drug. Having a mother take the medication immediately after breastfeeding is usually the safest time for the infant with most, but not all, drugs.
Watch the infant for any unusual signs or symptoms, such as a change in feeding pattern or sleeping habits, fussiness, or a rash, whenever the mother takes medication.
When possible, choose the drug that produces the least amount in the milk (e.g., sulfonamides; see Tables 11.1 and 11.2 ).
The transfer of drugs and other chemicals into human milk also has been detailed in statements by the AAP Committee on Drugs from 1983, with updates through 2013. 10 , 23
The list includes only those drugs about which published information is available, and it does not provide the pharmacologic properties of the compounds. The updated 2001 list was divided into the same seven categories as the earlier lists, grouping drugs by their risk factors in relation to breastfeeding. The categories are the following:
Cytotoxic drugs that may interfere with cellular metabolism of a nursing infant
Drugs of abuse
Radioactive compounds that require temporary cessation of breastfeeding
Drugs for which the effect on nursing infants is unknown but may be of concern
Drugs that have been associated with significant effects on some nursing infants and should be given to nursing mothers with caution
Maternal medications usually compatible with breastfeeding
Food and environmental agents: effect on breastfeeding
The list of more than 300 items included in the AAP review is not comprehensive or all-inclusive. Further, the committee encourages physicians to report adverse effects in infants consuming the milk of mothers taking specific drugs to the committee at the AAP. 23 The previous category listing from the FDA included succinct categories: Fetal Risk Factors/Pregnancy Categories (A, B, C, D, X). 24 A new rating system was proposed by the FDA in its Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule in 2013, which is more narrative and less “telegraphic.” 9 In his book Medications and Mothers’ Milk and the associated database, Dr. Thomas Hale and his team utilize another LRC based on their assessment of the risk data (L1=compatible with breastfeeding, L2=probably compatible, L3=probably compatible [individualized assessment of the benefits versus risk is appropriate], L4=possibly hazardous, L5=hazardous). 12
Briggs et al., in their classic text Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation , use the AAP classification. 5
The Breastfeeding and Human Lactation Study Center at the University of Rochester continually updates its database on drugs, medications, and contaminants in human milk. (See Chapter 25 .) More than 4000 references pertain to drugs in the database. In addition, other drugs typically used by women in their childbearing years for which there are no specific milk levels are listed with their oral bioavailability for infants, peak serum time in the mothers, volume of distribution for the drugs, and other pharmacologic information (pH, solubility, protein binding, metabolism) obtained from a host of resources. With this information, a physician should be able to determine relative risk and thus select the best compound and adjust the dose and the time of, and association to, the breastfeeding.
The Breastfeeding and Human Lactation Center is available during limited hours (8 am to 4 pm EST, Monday to Friday) to address more complex questions (585-275-0088).
LactMed is an extensive database (Drugs and Lactation Database) maintained and updated frequently by the National Library of Medicine and the professional contributors. It can be accessed at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30000282 . 4
E-Lactancia is a database resource maintained by the Association for Promotion and Cultural and Scientific Research of Breastfeeding in Spain ( http://www.e-lactancia.org ). 25
The Infant Risk Center is a website and call center resource at the University of Texas Tech University Health Science Center connected with Dr. Thomas Hale and his team (available at www.infantrisk.com and 806-352-2519). 26
Mother to Baby is the database and call center established in 2013 by the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists (OTIS) as the public face for the organization’s research and information service to mothers, families, and professionals concerning questions about pregnancy and lactation. OTIS was established in 1987 to connect world-renowned experts in the field of birth defects research to the general public. The Mother to Baby Organization answers questions and concerns related to pregnancy and lactation about the risks of medications, chemicals, herbal products, illicit drugs, diseases, and more via e-mail, telephone, and open chat ( https://mothertobaby.org , 866-626-6847).
This section will include only selected topics that are of current interest and not specifically addressed by an Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine clinical protocol: 9, Galactogogues; 13, Contraceptives; 15, Analgesia/Anesthesia; 18, Antidepressants in Nursing Mothers; 28, Peripartum Analgesia and Anesthesia; 29, Iron, Zinc, and Vitamin D Supplementation During Breastfeeding; and 31, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Studies in Lactating Women. Contraceptives are also addressed in Chapter 21 , Reproductive Function During Lactation. Many treatment topics (e.g., treatment of migraines, rheumatologic disorders, human immunodeficiency infection) are beyond the scope of this text, and a complete discussion and recommendations will not be addressed. With the available published resources, databases on medications and lactation, websites, and call-lines, it is easier for a practitioner to locate appropriate information about a specific medication and lactation in these other resources. This chapter includes some new tables with specific therapeutic groups of medications, primarily for comparison of the different medications and consideration of medication alternatives.
Analgesia is an essential consideration for the mother in the peripartum and postpartum period through the duration of lactation. Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic pain relief during labor and the postpartum period can improve overall maternal and infant outcomes by relieving suffering but may have consequences for breastfeeding. The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine (ABM) has published an evidence-based clinical protocol on peripartum analgesia and anesthesia for the breastfeeding mother. 27 There is a second clinical protocol from the ABM addressing analgesia and anesthesia for the breastfeeding mother outside the immediate postpartum period. 28 Benoit et al. have summarized the evidence for breastfeeding as analgesia for infants. 29 Physicians can familiarize themselves with the guidelines published by the ABM and then refer to the databases, Infantrisk.com and LactMed, to review up-to-date information on specific agents being considered for use in a lactating mother. Refer to Chapter 15 , Medical Complications of Mothers, for specific medical conditions.
The ABM’s clinical protocols on anesthesia in the peripartum period and beyond provide appropriate evidence-based guidance on the use of anesthesia for breastfeeding mothers. 27 , 28 There is a review of obstetrical anesthesia from the anesthesiologist’s perspective written by Lim et al. for additional reference. 30
Antibiotics are one of the most frequently utilized medications during lactation, along with analgesics and vitamins. The majority of antibiotics have recommended uses in infants and children for their own diagnosed infections and can be safely given to breastfeeding mothers. 31 , 32 Exposure of infants to antibiotics in any form raises concerns for sensitization, changes in intestinal flora (diarrhea or altered intestinal microbiome), and the development of drug-resistant microorganisms. Data are conflicting concerning early life antibiotic exposure and downstream effects of alteration of the infant’s intestinal microbiome (obesity, adiposity, inflammatory bowel disease, autism, or other nervous system effects). Van Wattum et al., in their systematic review, reported on a comparison of the absolute infant dose as a percentage of the therapeutic infant dose for 20 different antibiotics. The absolute infant dose for metronidazole was just over 10% of the therapeutic infant dose, vancomycin and azithromycin were approximately 6%, and the other 17 antibiotics were less than 4%. 32 The low levels of absolute infant dose from breastfeeding are highly unlikely to cause a problem for breastfeeding infants, whether they also are receiving the same antibiotic or not. Specifically, lactating mothers can use the penicillins, cephalosporins, vancomycin, and aminoglycosides without concerns relative to their infants. The notable exceptions to the apparent safety of antibiotics and breastfeeding include sulfonamide exposure in an infant less than 4 weeks of age because of concern for interference with bilirubin binding to albumen, tetracycline-related medications because of teeth staining and abnormal bone growth with prolonged exposure, chloramphenicol in infants related to “gray baby” syndrome or idiosyncratic bone marrow suppression, and erythromycin or azithromycin because of its association with pyloric stenosis when administered to infants in the first 4 to 6 weeks of life. For these antibiotics, a specific risk–benefit assessment should be reviewed with the mother. Chloroquine, gentamicin, streptomycin, and rifampin are reported by the AAP to be safe because they are not excreted in milk. 10
Fluoroquinolones had been restricted in pediatric use because of early reports of arthropathy in immature animals and a single report of pseudomembranous colitis in a breastfeeding infant whose mother had self-medicated with ciprofloxacin. 33 More recently, ciprofloxacin has been used in pediatric patients because it is valuable in gram-negative infections and also anthrax. The AAP Committee on Drugs has designated ciprofloxacin to be safe for breastfeeding women, although there are concerns for quinolones’ effect on the infant’s gut microbiome and development of drug-resistant organisms, as well as diarrhea or candidiasis. Otic or ophthalmic use by the mother is not a concern. Hale has listed ciprofloxacin as L3 (limited data—probably compatible, RID: 2.1% to 6.34%) and recommended avoiding breastfeeding for 3 to 4 hours after a dose to decrease the amount in breast milk. For the other quinolones, Hale has reported gatifloxacin as L3 (no data—probably compatible, RID: unknown), gemifloxacin as L3 (no data—probably compatible, RID: no data), levofloxacin as L2 (limited data—probably compatible, RID: 10.5% to 17.2%), moxifloxacin as L3 (no data—probably compatible, RID: unknown), norfloxacin as L3 (limited data—probably compatible, RID: unknown; little or no drug detected in milk; possibly the best alternative of the quinolones), ofloxacin as L2 (limited data—probably compatible, RID: 3.1%), and trovafloxacin as L4 (limited data—probably hazardous, RID: 4.2%; withdrawn from the US market because of concerns of acute liver failure). 12
Metronidazole (Flagyl) does appear in milk at levels approximately equal to those in serum: M/P ratio=1.15 and RID 12.6% to 13.5%. Metronidazole is directly used in infants and children (dose 15-50 mg PO per kg per day or 22.5-40 mg IV per kg per day). Most researchers consider the risk to an infant insufficient to suggest alternative therapy for the mother. Symptoms in the mother include decreased appetite and vomiting and, occasionally, blood dyscrasia.
One treatment regimen for maternal Trichomonas vaginalis is 2 g metronidazole in a single dose. When milk concentrations are measured after a 2-g dose, the highest concentrations are found at 2 and 4 hours postingestion and decline over the next 12 hours to 19.1 mg/mL and to 12.6 mg/mL at 24 hours. The dose to the infant is calculated to be 21.8 mg during the first 24 hours and only 3.5 mg in the second 24 hours. 34 It has been recommended that a single-dose regimen be used in nursing mothers, as well as delaying breastfeeding (3 to 4 hours) after the peak level at 2 hours to decrease the exposure. In another study with mothers receiving 600 mg or 1200 mg orally daily, the average milk metronidazole concentration was 5.7 and 14.4 mg/L, respectively. 35 The authors estimated that the amount metronidazole ingested by an infant would be 3 mg/kg in 500 mL of milk compared with the usual infant dose (15-50 mg PO per kg per day or 22.5-40 mg IV per kg per day). Metronidazole in gel or cream form contains only 0.75% of the medication and is poorly absorbed because the purpose is to work on tissues locally. As a result, maternal plasma levels are 1/50 of levels from comparable oral dosing. Use of the drug in this form would probably result in undetectable amounts in the milk. Metronidazole is often the only drug that works in a serious trichomoniasis, giardiasis, or amebiasis infection when all other treatments have failed. 33 Infant monitoring with maternal use of metronidazole should include observing for vomiting, diarrhea, dry mouth, and a change in the intestinal microbiome.
It is noteworthy that maternal noncompliance with antibiotics was measured by Ito in 203 breastfeeding women who consulted the Motherisk Program for information about antibiotics. 20 Despite reassuring advice, 1 in 5 women either did not initiate therapy or did not continue breastfeeding. This has implications for recurrent infections, drug sensitivity in the infant, and the development of drug resistance based on limited exposure or less-than-appropriate dosing of the antibiotic.
Anticholinergic drugs include atropine, scopolamine (hyoscine), and synthetic quaternary ammonium derivatives, some of which are available in over-the-counter medications. Some atropine does enter the milk. There are very limited data on their use during lactation. Infants are particularly sensitive to these drugs; therefore infant monitoring should include drowsiness, insomnia, dry and hot skin, dry mouth, increased heart rate, and constipation or urinary retention. The quaternary anticholinergics, however, should not appear in milk to any degree because, as anions, they do not pass into the relatively acidic milk. Mepenzolate methylbromide (Cantil) does not appear in milk.
Scopolamine is available by dermal patch for motion sickness and causes maternal mucous membrane dryness, which could affect milk production because it restricts the secretions of other secretory glands. Only a small amount appears in milk. The AAP rates it and atropine as category 6, drugs usually compatible with breastfeeding, and Hale ranks atropine as L3 (no data—probably compatible). For the scopolamine patch, which provides a constant level of drug, there are no data on its transfer into breast milk, but it is poorly orally bioavailable. Pressure-point wristbands are reported to be effective for motion sickness in pregnancy and lactation and contain no medication.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here