Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
It is not clear that there is a specific definition for a massive rotator cuff tear, but it can be loosely defined as one that involves two complete tendon tears or one that is as greater than 5 cm in length from anterior to posterior. It is difficult for surgeons to determine whether a massive, retracted rotator cuff tear is reparable. This is true for both arthroscopic and conventional open techniques. If the tendon is mobile and can be advanced to its anatomic location or medialized within 10 mm of its anatomic location without shoulder abduction, the tear is reparable. If, on initial inspection, the tendon does not meet these criteria, it is not necessarily irreparable. Subacromial, subdeltoid, and intra-articular adhesions may limit cuff excursion. With an arthroscopic technique, the surgeon can release these adhesions and determine definitively whether the tear is reparable. Sometimes, large tears are only partially reparable, but that may yield a better outcome than no repair at all.
In order to repair massive tears, débridement and soft tissue releases must be done to determine reparability. The arthroscope may need to be moved to different cannulas to get a perspective of the tear geometry. Large or massive retracted rotator cuff tears differ from smaller tears in six aspects:
Quantity of sutures and anchors
Tear geometry
Variability of repair sequence
Suture management
Tendon-to-tendon repair
Muscle quality
The most straightforward aspect is quantity of sutures and anchors. Larger tears require more anchors, more sutures, and more time to complete.
Tear geometry is difficult to identify. Larger tears often assume distorted shapes because the tendons have detached, rotated, and come to rest far from their insertion sites. The tendon has deformed plastically. It is often difficult to understand how points on the retracted tendon attach to corresponding points on the humeral head. Identifying this relationship requires an understanding of the geometry of the tear and thus the geometry of the repair ( Fig. 13.1 ). This is difficult enough when then tendon is mobile, but it becomes increasingly complex when the tear is retracted and fixed. Only with thorough soft tissue releases can the surgeon maneuver the tendon and determine the precise repair site.
The surgeon must often alter the normal repair technique of placing anchors from anterior to posterior and tying knots from posterior to anterior. The repair may require knot tying from anterior to posterior, or the surgeon may have to repair the most anterior and posterior margins first and repair the central portion last.
In addition, suture management is complex. As the number of anchors and sutures increases, the technical difficulty seems to increase geometrically. Strict adherence to two principles is vital: keep the working cannula free of sutures, and transfer suture strands so they do not cross the area of tendon repair.
It is often necessary to combine a longitudinal tendon-to-tendon repair with a transverse tendon-to-bone repair. This may require the use of different suturing techniques, sutures, instruments, viewing portals, and knot-tying methods ( Fig. 13.2 ).
Finally, massive rotator cuff tears are diseases of tendon and muscle. These large tendon tears are usually chronic and are accompanied by significant muscle atrophy. The surgeon must be aware that heroic efforts to repair tendons will not produce a successful result if the corresponding muscles are not functional.
Cordasco and Bigliani reported on the open repair of massive rotator cuff tears. In their series, 85% of patients (52 of 61) had satisfactory results, and 92% (56 of 61) had satisfactory pain relief; they experienced mean gains of 76 degrees in forward elevation and 30 degrees in external rotation. Burkhart reported similar results with the arthroscopic treatment of massive tears. Burkhart has also contributed greatly to our understanding of the biomechanics of massive rotator cuff tears and their repair. The concept of margin convergence is particularly useful. The first principle of margin convergence is that partial repair of a massive tear can reduce the patient's pain and improve function. Complete anatomic repair, though desirable, may not be possible in patients with massive rotator cuff tears; however, a good outcome can be achieved with a partial repair. The second principle is that if the surgeon can establish anterior and posterior force couple of the shoulder, good function is possible even if the supraspinatus is not reparable. The anterior force couple component may be established with subscapularis repair, and the posterior force couple component may be established with infraspinatus repair.
The healing rate of large and massive tears has been reported by a number of authors, with healing rates ranging from 0% to 80%. There appears to be a higher healing rate with modern double-row fixation techniques. Warner (see Costouros et al.) discussed the possibility that abnormalities of the suprascapular nerve may be partially responsible for pain in patients with retracted tears. It is not unreasonable to assume that tendon retraction and the resulting distortion of the suprascapular nerve could be a source of pain.
Visualization of a massive rotator cuff tear can often be easier than for a smaller tear since a large volume of tissue, the rotator cuff, is displaced medially. However, some acute massive tears can be difficult to visualize if the torn margins of the rotator cuff are thickened or shredded. The camera is initially placed in the posterior portal, as usual, in the glenohumeral joint. The size of the tear may or may not be appreciated from this view. The arthroscope is then removed and the trocar is inserted in the arthroscopic cannula to allow placement into the subacromial space. This is done as described in Chapter 12 where the cannula is placed to the level of the anterior acromial corner and then swept medially and laterally. This is done to ensure that any torn rotator cuff tissue that is adherent to the acromial undersurface is stripped and placed below the camera. A lateral portal is established and used to remove any obstructive bursa and to allow the camera to be transferred to the lateral portal ( Figs. 13.3–13.10 ).
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here