Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The perivisceral aorta can be involved in a variety of pathologic conditions. These diverse conditions include atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the aorta and its visceral branches, aneurysmal degeneration, trauma (both penetrating and blunt), and congenital problems (e.g., midabdominal coarctation). The exposure of the paravisceral aorta is also relevant for reoperative aortic surgery such as open conversion after failed endovascular aneurysm repair or failed aortobifemoral bypass.
Adequate exposure of the paravisceral aorta is tantamount to the successful conduct of the operation, regardless of the indication for the procedure. The exposure of the paravisceral aorta can be technically challenging, particularly in the reoperative setting and for obese patients, although the various approaches are within the skill set of experienced modern vascular surgeons. Indeed, the majority of the open aortic procedures currently performed at our tertiary care medical centers involve the paravisceral aorta, and it is our expectation that this trend will continue given the advances in the endovascular approach for most aortic pathologies.
There is no one universal approach to the paravisceral aorta that is adequate for all indications. The specific choice or approach should be dictated by the underlying condition, the treatment goals for reconstruction, the presence of arterial or venous anatomic variants, the presence of associated injuries in the case of trauma, and any prior incisions. The various approaches include the transperitoneal approach to the celiac artery and supraceliac aorta, the transperitoneal approach to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and pararenal aorta (including the right medial visceral rotation), the retroperitoneal approach to the complete abdominal aorta, and the transperitoneal approach to the complete abdominal aorta using left medial visceral rotation. Given the current quality of computed tomography (CT) imaging, a safe preoperative plan can usually be developed that is rarely altered by the intraoperative findings.
The exposure of the supraceliac aorta and the celiac artery is required for antegrade bypass to the visceral vessels (both SMA and celiac artery) in the setting of mesenteric ischemia and for the more common scenario when proximal control of the abdominal aorta is required as in the case of a ruptured infrarenal or juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. The origin of the celiac artery and a 5- to 8-cm segment of the aorta caudal to its origin may be exposed using this approach, although a more limited approach and dissection is usually sufficient if the objective is only to apply a proximal aortic clamp. The supraceliac aorta is usually relatively free of atherosclerotic occlusive disease and therefore is a good inflow source for antegrade visceral bypass. The exposure of the segment of aorta caudal to the celiac artery is somewhat limited through this approach given the overlying anatomic structures and should be exposed through an alternative approach.
The procedure can be performed using either a midline or bilateral subcostal incision; the choice is contingent upon the surgeon’s preference and the patient’s body habitus. The midline incision is slightly easier to close, although a bilateral subcostal incision with a midline extension to the xiphoid provides optimal exposure of the upper abdomen. A lumbar bump can augment the aortic exposure for all of the transperitoneal approaches.
After a general exploration of the abdomen, the left triangular ligament of the liver is incised and the left lateral segment of the liver is reflected to the patient’s right side using a self-retaining retractor such as a Bookwalter. Care should be exercised during incision of the triangular ligament to avoid injuring the hepatic veins. The gastrohepatic ligament is then incised, although caution should be exercised during this maneuver because a replaced left hepatic artery, a common anatomic variant, passes through the ligament. The esophagus and stomach are then retracted to the patient’s left, and identification of the esophagus is facilitated by palpation of the nasogastric tube or transesophageal echocardiography probe. The exposure can be facilitated at this point by placing the patient in a significant amount of reverse Trendelenburg, allowing the abdominal structures to retract caudally by gravity.
The median arcuate ligament and the crus of the diaphragm are incised to expose the underlying aorta; this can be facilitated by incising the muscle fibers between the jaws of a large right-angle clamp using electrocautery ( Figure 1 ). The dissection of the aorta cephalad to the celiac artery can be exposed relatively quickly, although care should be exercised in the segment adjacent to the celiac artery to avoid inadvertent injury to the vessel. Additionally, a dense neural plexus, further complicating the dissection, encases the origin of the celiac artery.
The extent of the aortic dissection required is dictated by the clinical situation. It is not usually necessary to dissect the aorta circumferentially, but it can be helpful to place an umbilical tape around the aorta to serve as a handle should difficulties arise. Importantly, the intercostal vessels come off the posterior aspect of the aorta at this location and can be easily injured. Occasionally the pleura of the lung is entered during the dissection. This is usually obvious and of little consequence, although a chest radiograph should be obtained in the immediate postoperative period to confirm that the lungs are fully expanded. Vascular control of the supraceliac aorta can be obtained very expeditiously if necessary (e.g., unstable patient with ruptured aneurysm) by bluntly dissecting the crus of the diaphragm with the index and long fingers and using them as a guide to position an aortic clamp.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here